Database Users

Mobile Web benchmark

The newest Qualcomm mobile web bench Vellamo, I'd say something new to try, I got 640 on 1.8.3 (froyo)
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

I got 945 on my Galaxy Tab 10.1

Got 722 in GB
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.

I got 610 on 1.8.3. Its shame that samsung's tab carries the same core and ram, and still navigates much, much better, even if you disconsider this benchmark.

KingKuba13 said:
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~

ofek said:
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever used an GS2 and an Atrix side by side? I love our phone man, but there's a reason why the GS2 is 20% more expensive on some countries than the Atrix with it's packed-to-full box and the lapdock together.

slimslim said:
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.

KingKuba13 said:
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

inoskedu8o8 said:
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.

Looks like LG 2x with custom roms is killing this benchmark. 2000 +

KingKuba13 said:
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's running stock. It does beat atrix with cf bench. Atrix beats it with quadrant though. Guys in the evo3d forum that are overclocked at 1.5 are smacking the sgs2 with cf bench. What does this mean in real world performance? Absolutely nothing. C'mon man I thought you knew.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

[Q] Blade benchmark scores

Hi guys,
Anyone care to share what sort of quadrant and linpack scores they are getting from their blade?
I'm running CM7.1.0 installed via the gen1 to gen2 tpt method.
My quadrant score is 960 and linpack (single thread) is around 9 mflops.
Pretty good score on quadrant for a budget device imo, probably because the graphics are quite good, linpack score exposes the slower cpu though.
Anyone beat those scores?

Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.

1445 points in quadrant standard... see attached screenie-

n3tk0 said:
Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you using?!I only get around 850 no OC in quadrant..

Quadrant Benchmark sucks, use ANTUTU, for a proper Benchmark score. And please mention what roms you are using and what frequency is your processor running at.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium

Even ANTUTU does not give accurate benchmark scores, no mobile benchmark really does. for example users have reported scoring around 200 points for 2D graphics on the galaxy nexus, whereas my ZTE blade scores about 300.

ANTUTU is still more accurate than quadrant.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium

1770 on AnTuTu with newest CM7 Burtslam´s build

Sej last build + wbaw last kernel
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!

Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

karthiknr said:
Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
View attachment 922142
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!

Gokh said:
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. His build and kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

This is from today evening. Wbaw's KANG and Kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!

Gokh said:
It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

karthiknr said:
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.

wbaw said:
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. But still the scores seem to be pretty high. Maybe because of the overclock. And like you said there is lot of visual improvement in games which Antutu may not calculate accurately.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

Antutu Benchmark on S3

Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA

spyro0610 said:
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.

LiquidNarwhal said:
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you try to your S3?
can bring my device to customer service for them to check?

Mine says triple to !
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

currydude said:
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA

Why do people just want to number crunch benchmarks? They really mean nothing.... The best benchmark test is how it works in real life, is the OS smooth, do the apps work well on it, any lag at all... That is the best benchmark. Christ, my old HTC desire nearly had the same scores as the stock sensation according to BM scores, in real life however is was lagging like a pig stuck in mud. Lol
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

There is no need to check if its true because its not.
Its probably just detected that one of the cores was turned off at the time.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

spyro0610 said:
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is normal. Antutu definitely looks too low. Are you using anything like setcpu or any power saving apps?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Are you triple core guys using siyah kernel? I use System Panel to monitor my phone and it only shows three active cores. Till now I didn't put much into it though, thinking that it's just because there wasn't enough load to start the fourth core. But maybe there is an issue after all?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

re
hello
well i used to have very random scores varying from 5000 to 12000
yesterday i ran the test and got 12064 but when checking it says dual-core armv7 processor(vf9v3, neon)
also i have another question regarding the processor, shouldnt it be arm v9 ???

Quadrant optimization

Is quadrant optimized for quad core tablets? I keep seeing quadrant scores that show phones such as the galaxy s2 and any snapdragon s4 phone. Is our processor just not as fast as the others? Or is tegra 3 not optimized? I know that tegra is great for gaming, but is it as fast as some of the other processors on the market? Thanks

ncvikingx97 said:
Is quadrant optimized for quad core tablets? I keep seeing quadrant scores that show phones such as the galaxy s2 and any snapdragon s4 phone. Is our processor just not as fast as the others? Or is tegra 3 not optimized? I know that tegra is great for gaming, but is it as fast as some of the other processors on the market? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the worst of the Tegra3's, still good VFM for 160-200
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app

Yeah. So would it be safe to overclock to the full 1.5 ghz? Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quadrant scores aren't really consistent as I've had one test give me 5200 and then a second run giving me 4400 without changing anything. Antutu seems to be more consistent with scores and since the benchmark runs longer, it gives a more accurate result.
Sent from my Nexus 7

Cool. Would an overclock improve performance that much?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah you should see improvement in applications with overclocks. Here is my highest in quadrant so far with _motley 1.0.11 @ 1.7ghz. The version is unstable as a lot of people have reported issues. However, 1.0.10 is pretty good. There are also other kernels in the dev section that are overclocked and should benefit you from the stock kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 7

1.6 GHz:

Cool. Is it safe to overclock to that high? I am thinking 1.4-1.5 ghz
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quadrant never has been to reliable. As I and a few of my buddies have learned, quadrant scores don't mean anything. I have found that cf-bench is quite significantly more accurate and reliable
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app

Thanks. Any overheating with overclock issues

My Galaxy S3 Quadrant Score : 8727 Really!.

I have not seen the wrong friends .. I developed a new missile with rum was like the Galaxy s3. We have i3 CPU processor equivalent notebooks.
Country : Turkey - Manisa

Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.

Faked.
This thread ****ing sucks.

unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.

Showing off fake does not make you feel any better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

2 posts in 4 years @[email protected] Says a lot really LOL

Drakenfall said:
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paintball23456 said:
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.

Scores with quadrant are equal to none. Its unreliable and even if you get a high or low score it says nothing about your phone
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

nfsmw_gr said:
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel

Lol this is mine overclocked to 1.6 ghz..... 6264 quadrant...so his score is fake :beer:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

OZAN4545 said:
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

viking37 said:
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.

78cortina said:
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hum... Because kayakernel = Siyah kernel... ??? :what: weird
And thanks I know Siyah kernel...
After that if people can't write right a kernel name...
This CPU score of about 28 000 at 1.7 Ghz, even with Siyah kernel, how?, ROM, other tweaks, settings?
I realy don't know how it's possible... Something is strange.
I would like to see an Antutu score, Cf-Bench and Vellamo...
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app

Please share all relevant info please fill in the gaps
ROM:
KERNEL: SIYAH
CPU: 1.7
GPU steps:
Stweaks config:
Just so others can test this for themselves
im what Willis was talking about

.........7 inches
.......ooooooops, my apologies, I thought you said " compare d*ck size"

Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...

Bilux said:
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!

slaphead20 said:
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get similar videos all over the net though
《posted from samsung rom》

i think the score.makes sense. he is using the older version of.quadrant
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium

Tweaked system settings, no big deal good for running one program and nothing else. Like running something with a priority of realtime in Windows.
Pump the CPU to stay at 1.7, run Quadrant exit out go to console raise its nice priority etc, go back and bingo nice big scores!
What's the point of this post, to show all you can use System Tuner or scripts or the console?