I have not seen the wrong friends .. I developed a new missile with rum was like the Galaxy s3. We have i3 CPU processor equivalent notebooks.
Country : Turkey - Manisa
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Faked.
This thread ****ing sucks.
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Showing off fake does not make you feel any better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2 posts in 4 years @[email protected] Says a lot really LOL
Drakenfall said:
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paintball23456 said:
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Scores with quadrant are equal to none. Its unreliable and even if you get a high or low score it says nothing about your phone
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
nfsmw_gr said:
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Lol this is mine overclocked to 1.6 ghz..... 6264 quadrant...so his score is fake :beer:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
OZAN4545 said:
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
viking37 said:
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
78cortina said:
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hum... Because kayakernel = Siyah kernel... ??? :what: weird
And thanks I know Siyah kernel...
After that if people can't write right a kernel name...
This CPU score of about 28 000 at 1.7 Ghz, even with Siyah kernel, how?, ROM, other tweaks, settings?
I realy don't know how it's possible... Something is strange.
I would like to see an Antutu score, Cf-Bench and Vellamo...
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app
Please share all relevant info please fill in the gaps
ROM:
KERNEL: SIYAH
CPU: 1.7
GPU steps:
Stweaks config:
Just so others can test this for themselves
im what Willis was talking about
.........7 inches
.......ooooooops, my apologies, I thought you said " compare d*ck size"
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Bilux said:
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
slaphead20 said:
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get similar videos all over the net though
《posted from samsung rom》
i think the score.makes sense. he is using the older version of.quadrant
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Tweaked system settings, no big deal good for running one program and nothing else. Like running something with a priority of realtime in Windows.
Pump the CPU to stay at 1.7, run Quadrant exit out go to console raise its nice priority etc, go back and bingo nice big scores!
What's the point of this post, to show all you can use System Tuner or scripts or the console?
Related
What's the average score for a evo on cm7 .
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
parmend said:
What's the average score for a evo on cm7 .
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tested at 41.8
Yeah, I would say avg is anywhere from 35 to 42, depending on clock speed. What happens if you run it again right after a couple times?
One time I got and 8, and I was like, WTF? Ran it again and got a 38.
Thanks, I just ran it and it still 16-18. Does the kernal matter. I'm on timat 3.3.7
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
yeah on cm7 I got 40 give or take.
stock sense is like 32 for me and overclocked to 1.2ghz i get 38-39.
bfs kernels were hit or mis on my EVO. Kinda clunky on mine.
I'f you're getting low linpack scores try switching from smartass to conservative(just to score higher). Also I get an average of 41 with my phone clocked at 1190.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Specs in sig, I just got 43.261, average is 42-44.
How do you check?
Arnezie said:
How do you check?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download linpack from the market
mattykinsx said:
Download linpack from the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
32.059
Stock rooted rom
25.59 Destroyed v2 how do i improve that?
39.6
Mik 4.61
Netarchty-toastmod 4.3.1
Setcpu CPU 1190MHZ Very Stable
Quadrant vs linpack? Which one is more important?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
parmend said:
Quadrant vs linpack? Which one is more important?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say definitely linpack. Quadrant is not consistent.
you can get bad scores if you have to many services running. i get 33-35 stock non rooted hw 004. got up to 44+ on my old hw 002(got the restart when overheated problem) when 2.2 first came out, completely stock but since then they have added alot of services that slow it down
if the media scanner is running. i get about 22. so check that in the services if you are getting bad scores
Fricksta said:
25.59 Destroyed v2 how do i improve that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Need more details. What kernel, what CPU settings, etc. I was getting 38-40 on d2.
Just got 40.75 on cm7 with dark horse theme and sz 2.0.0 ondemand 1190
The Linpack app also does not pull enough from CPU to ramp the CPU to max. Set your minimum CPU to the same as your max, run linpack then lower your minimum CPU speed, Interactive is best governor to use for this
all these tests are for is braggin rights...these scores will not be like, oh check it out, my browser loads .3 seconds quicker bc i got 3 more mflops...get out of hee, find a rom you like, and use it, most of them are very good. There is not one rom on this site that blows away the competetion, they are all very very very similiar in speed, nuff said
dsexton702 said:
These are some tweaks created by dsexton702 that offer you a generous performance boost in I/O and giving you the newest fugu mod 3.1. This is a fast growing tweak and needs to be shared with everyone who can benefit from it
download the U.S.A.Sv6
OP: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1236779
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does work on our phones as I'm using right know...just thought I pass on the good work of these devs...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
What is it like V6SuperCharger?
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
It speeds up and opyimuzes androids Input and output....its just version6 of the mod.....thy have a new version but I haven't tried yet..I've used this on my HTC hd2 and mytouch 4g and know my shift .....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Idk if I posted in right section if not can mod move this please to right one....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
VICODAN said:
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You see I did tweak my ##DATA# setting and use Scarykernel on the latest CM7 nightlies. There's a noticable improvement using V6Supercharger over without on my device.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score with Scary kernel on toasty at 1900mhz?
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Proof that this **** is useless:
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty gov for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.
BTW:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1296614
---------- Post added at 01:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
notsointeresting said:
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
VICODAN said:
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Np.. just saying everytime I flash a nightly I have to do this.. it's annoying as hell where as I just flash ScaryStable once with each nightly flash and I'm good to go and I notice a HUGE difference in performance.
For what it's worth, the V6 Supercharger (currently running the update9 beta) provides an optimal RAM manager which eliminated my habit of installing AutoKiller w/ every ROM. Since running the Supercharger script, I've consistently ran w/ 175-180MB in free RAM w/ no app FC's. That alone is worth using this mod in my book.
Ty 4 trying.....tying to expand this to more people and let them know about it.I.think its worth all the hype and attention I can give it.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Hi guys,
Anyone care to share what sort of quadrant and linpack scores they are getting from their blade?
I'm running CM7.1.0 installed via the gen1 to gen2 tpt method.
My quadrant score is 960 and linpack (single thread) is around 9 mflops.
Pretty good score on quadrant for a budget device imo, probably because the graphics are quite good, linpack score exposes the slower cpu though.
Anyone beat those scores?
Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.
1445 points in quadrant standard... see attached screenie-
n3tk0 said:
Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you using?!I only get around 850 no OC in quadrant..
Quadrant Benchmark sucks, use ANTUTU, for a proper Benchmark score. And please mention what roms you are using and what frequency is your processor running at.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium
Even ANTUTU does not give accurate benchmark scores, no mobile benchmark really does. for example users have reported scoring around 200 points for 2D graphics on the galaxy nexus, whereas my ZTE blade scores about 300.
ANTUTU is still more accurate than quadrant.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium
1770 on AnTuTu with newest CM7 Burtslam´s build
Sej last build + wbaw last kernel
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
View attachment 922142
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Gokh said:
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. His build and kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
This is from today evening. Wbaw's KANG and Kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Gokh said:
It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.
wbaw said:
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. But still the scores seem to be pretty high. Maybe because of the overclock. And like you said there is lot of visual improvement in games which Antutu may not calculate accurately.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
spyro0610 said:
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
LiquidNarwhal said:
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you try to your S3?
can bring my device to customer service for them to check?
Mine says triple to !
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
currydude said:
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Why do people just want to number crunch benchmarks? They really mean nothing.... The best benchmark test is how it works in real life, is the OS smooth, do the apps work well on it, any lag at all... That is the best benchmark. Christ, my old HTC desire nearly had the same scores as the stock sensation according to BM scores, in real life however is was lagging like a pig stuck in mud. Lol
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
There is no need to check if its true because its not.
Its probably just detected that one of the cores was turned off at the time.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
spyro0610 said:
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is normal. Antutu definitely looks too low. Are you using anything like setcpu or any power saving apps?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Are you triple core guys using siyah kernel? I use System Panel to monitor my phone and it only shows three active cores. Till now I didn't put much into it though, thinking that it's just because there wasn't enough load to start the fourth core. But maybe there is an issue after all?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
re
hello
well i used to have very random scores varying from 5000 to 12000
yesterday i ran the test and got 12064 but when checking it says dual-core armv7 processor(vf9v3, neon)
also i have another question regarding the processor, shouldnt it be arm v9 ???
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he meant inferior CPU and superior i/o.
HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you underclocked?
i got double your cpu score on 1.45ghz
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Managed to get 4.5k quadrant score at 1.45 on the older builds. 4K with 1.3ghz
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
I guess I wasn't clear enough lol
My phone was at stock 1ghz. This was to compare objectively to the bar below the "your device" bar, which was entitled "atrix 4g" which had, yes, superior cpu and inferior i/o scores.
Of course you will get better scores overclocked to 1.45 ghz. Try to understand what I'm asking about. I'll ask more clearly.
Why does a custom rom appear to get a worse cpu score than stock at same clock rate? Shouldn't it be equal or greater?
squee666 said:
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that true? System panel gives independent readouts of the load on each core and they seem to both be working. But if they don't both work in quadrant that would explain it all =) (except why quadrant lol)
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Score I got at 1.3ghz faux kernel on am older version of cm9. Yea quadrant reads that there are 2 cores. Just does not use them properly.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Thanks guys. That does seem to be the issue. Here is a score @ 1gHz with mokee os. Looks pretty obvious that both cores are working here:
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
squee666 said:
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at my blue (ie cpu) bar in this image compared to the image in my first post. I believe it is, in fact, quite obvious. Lol... At least that something is significantly improved cpu-wise...
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app