Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
spyro0610 said:
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
LiquidNarwhal said:
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you try to your S3?
can bring my device to customer service for them to check?
Mine says triple to !
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
currydude said:
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Why do people just want to number crunch benchmarks? They really mean nothing.... The best benchmark test is how it works in real life, is the OS smooth, do the apps work well on it, any lag at all... That is the best benchmark. Christ, my old HTC desire nearly had the same scores as the stock sensation according to BM scores, in real life however is was lagging like a pig stuck in mud. Lol
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
There is no need to check if its true because its not.
Its probably just detected that one of the cores was turned off at the time.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
spyro0610 said:
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is normal. Antutu definitely looks too low. Are you using anything like setcpu or any power saving apps?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Are you triple core guys using siyah kernel? I use System Panel to monitor my phone and it only shows three active cores. Till now I didn't put much into it though, thinking that it's just because there wasn't enough load to start the fourth core. But maybe there is an issue after all?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
re
hello
well i used to have very random scores varying from 5000 to 12000
yesterday i ran the test and got 12064 but when checking it says dual-core armv7 processor(vf9v3, neon)
also i have another question regarding the processor, shouldnt it be arm v9 ???
Related
The newest Qualcomm mobile web bench Vellamo, I'd say something new to try, I got 640 on 1.8.3 (froyo)
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I got 945 on my Galaxy Tab 10.1
Got 722 in GB
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
I got 610 on 1.8.3. Its shame that samsung's tab carries the same core and ram, and still navigates much, much better, even if you disconsider this benchmark.
KingKuba13 said:
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
ofek said:
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever used an GS2 and an Atrix side by side? I love our phone man, but there's a reason why the GS2 is 20% more expensive on some countries than the Atrix with it's packed-to-full box and the lapdock together.
slimslim said:
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
KingKuba13 said:
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
inoskedu8o8 said:
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Looks like LG 2x with custom roms is killing this benchmark. 2000 +
KingKuba13 said:
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's running stock. It does beat atrix with cf bench. Atrix beats it with quadrant though. Guys in the evo3d forum that are overclocked at 1.5 are smacking the sgs2 with cf bench. What does this mean in real world performance? Absolutely nothing. C'mon man I thought you knew.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
good idea, but without OS informations it is bit worthless. pls update. thx
KulDrive said:
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your post is already flawed since quadrant doesn't have good support for dual core... accuracy may be off. Try ChainFire.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=93702893
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
No quadrant doesn't use both cores use newer bench
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
KulDrive said:
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unless you re-wrote the APK to support both cores, then you're gonna be better off using either Antutu or CF Bench.
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
WiredPirate said:
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
testing antutu one moment please
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
i dont see how the new samsung is better though
it seems to hang when doing the sd read and write im prolly loseing a few points because of my generic sd card
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
oh here is a test with cf bench
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ltdanno360 said:
oh here is a test with cf bench View attachment 741213
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here's my CF Bench (taken on CM7 Pre-beta 2; haven't had a reason to do another one since then)
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
halfgingghost said:
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow scores like this that beet the sgs2
make me want to flash cm7 stat! only one thing keeps me from it ; my custom webtop; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
freshbakd said:
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1g ram free? How? I only have 893
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Man, just started a similar thread without knowing that this thread was created.
Kinda changed it though into a competition style; I think some people in here may want to post in my thread as well as some people are getting seriously high benchmarks!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1294749
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Phoneguy589 said:
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea hopfully we can get some kinda superkernal 2.5oc to blow sg2 out of the water but i think our phones might blowup first; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
He Guys,
The day has come, Android 4.0.3 aka Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) has come to our loved tablets! But is there really a big performance boost where everyone was talking about? Lets find out!
NOTE:
Just did a retest and I it scored 2426!
Tedr44 had made a nice POST with good battery info and GPS info! check it out.
ps. it's my first kinda "review" video so be gentle
Dunno whats up with your device but i got around 2500 on 2 successive tests.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Cool to see the benchmark improvement. Thanks for doing this. Hope to upgrade as soon as I go home.
PS: enjoyed the softcore porn music in the video
gkillerx said:
He Guys,
The day has come, Android 4.0.3 aka Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) has come to our loved tablets! But is there really a big performance boost where everyone was talking about? Lets find out!
ps. it's my first kinda "review" video so be gentle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just have to LOL at the elevator music
MarkyG82 said:
Dunno whats up with your device but i got around 2500 on 2 successive tests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you are on stock ? No CMW or root what so ever?
I will do a retest 3 times to see if I get the same scores...
El Niche said:
Cool to see the benchmark improvement. Thanks for doing this. Hope to upgrade as soon as I go home.
PS: enjoyed the softcore porn music in the video
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man! haha I just wanted to add some cooldown/lounch music!
luna_c666 said:
I just have to LOL at the elevator music
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Elevator music? haha well glad you had a laugh at it ! Still hope it was usefull for you
Pulled 4948. Which is down from 7181 that I had when OC'd.
Edit: I'm using Antutu.
gkillerx said:
And you are on stock ? No CMW or root what so ever?
I will do a retest 3 times to see if I get the same scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes cwm, root, but no mods.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
5070 myself on antutu, forced gpu rendering, and 4 back process max. All other options stock
MarkyG82 said:
Yes cwm, root, but no mods.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is odd... only think I hadn't was root and cwm
kingofyo1 said:
5070 myself on antutu, forced gpu rendering, and 4 back process max. All other options stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did a test with forced gpu and it was a little better, not much. What do you mean with 4 back process max?
My Quadrant score from my rooted Transformer with bloat removed. So awesome!
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
luna_c666 said:
I just have to LOL at the elevator music
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol elevator music .... I was waiting for an old school porn scene to come on or something lol
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
My Antutu score, again on stock, rooted, and debloated.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
gkillerx said:
That is odd... only think I hadn't was root and cwm
Did a test with forced gpu and it was a little better, not much. What do you mean with 4 back process max?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in developer options, check out the background process limit. I set mine at 4 for that test. Basically it kills processes that are running in background once it reaches the user set limit
5440 1st test and 5512 2nd test with AnTuTu. Coming from Revolver with dalvik and cache wiped. Satisfied. ICS really runs great. Can't wait for custom roms.
ICS Kernel ?
Can anyone tell me what is the number of the new ics on their devices ? I have installed the ww version and it says
2.6.39.4-00002-g2977a0d
[email protected]#1
Can anyone confirm this please . Thanks .
hanybv said:
Can anyone tell me what is the number of the new ics on their devices ? I have installed the ww version and it says
2.6.39.4-00002-g2977a0d
[email protected]#1
Can anyone confirm this please . Thanks .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same number on my WW.
I installed daoist's WW ICS Rom
I didn't bother to test extensively, but I did wipe my tablet and do the SunSpider Javascript Benchmark before upgrading, then wiped a second time and did SunSpider again after upgrading.
The result? I got a slightly worse score for ICS, but only negligibly so (and it was within the margin of error for both the before and after tests, hence realistically there was absolutely no difference.)
But that's for one single metric: stock browser javascript speed.
comparing two ICS units im getting:
Quadrant
TF - 2420
Nexus - 3005 (but with custom ROM/Kernel - but no overclocking/undervolting)
Antutu
TF - 4992
Nexus - 6289
very different machines I know but the Nexus scores shown are way above 'stock' nexus so id expect to see some serious tweaking boost the TF nicely too
.... but to be fair we all know such stats are fairly meaningless ....
Completely stock ICS on my Transformer, and I was getting between 2400-2600 benchmarks in Quadrant.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Just did a retest and I got 2426! With all my programs installed etc. So i gues it was still setteling in at the time of recording
If you guys want more ICS video's just ask!
I have not seen the wrong friends .. I developed a new missile with rum was like the Galaxy s3. We have i3 CPU processor equivalent notebooks.
Country : Turkey - Manisa
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Faked.
This thread ****ing sucks.
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Showing off fake does not make you feel any better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2 posts in 4 years @[email protected] Says a lot really LOL
Drakenfall said:
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paintball23456 said:
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Scores with quadrant are equal to none. Its unreliable and even if you get a high or low score it says nothing about your phone
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
nfsmw_gr said:
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Lol this is mine overclocked to 1.6 ghz..... 6264 quadrant...so his score is fake :beer:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
OZAN4545 said:
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
viking37 said:
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
78cortina said:
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hum... Because kayakernel = Siyah kernel... ??? :what: weird
And thanks I know Siyah kernel...
After that if people can't write right a kernel name...
This CPU score of about 28 000 at 1.7 Ghz, even with Siyah kernel, how?, ROM, other tweaks, settings?
I realy don't know how it's possible... Something is strange.
I would like to see an Antutu score, Cf-Bench and Vellamo...
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app
Please share all relevant info please fill in the gaps
ROM:
KERNEL: SIYAH
CPU: 1.7
GPU steps:
Stweaks config:
Just so others can test this for themselves
im what Willis was talking about
.........7 inches
.......ooooooops, my apologies, I thought you said " compare d*ck size"
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Bilux said:
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
slaphead20 said:
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get similar videos all over the net though
《posted from samsung rom》
i think the score.makes sense. he is using the older version of.quadrant
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Tweaked system settings, no big deal good for running one program and nothing else. Like running something with a priority of realtime in Windows.
Pump the CPU to stay at 1.7, run Quadrant exit out go to console raise its nice priority etc, go back and bingo nice big scores!
What's the point of this post, to show all you can use System Tuner or scripts or the console?
Hi, my N4 is getting poor benchmarks especially in Antutu....the weird thing is that i'm getting the poor resaults only
in CPU & RAM tests, while in GPU, I/O, SD test are good. in CPU i'm getting ~2000 insted of ~7000
and in RAM i'm getting ~1200 instead of ~2400.... what's wrong with my N4????
i'm on RootBox rom and Matr1x kernel.
see Attached File.
AW: N4 gets poor benchmarks!
Are you on a stock rom? If not, then it may be the kernels fault. I remember when a friend of mine flashed bricked kernel and got scores bader then my galaxy s he flashed back immediately, but while using it (he used it for about a day with a bad kernel) he did not noticed Any difference... When you are on stock, look for apps that run in background and use much CPU time or/and ram.
i think maybe my N4 is using 1 or 2 cores... but it's not explaining the RAM...
i'm on RootBox rom and Matr1x kernel....and i already tried Franco and Bricked and no difference .... so which kernel is the best???
Stock ROM I'm on, I get 17750 so just under the reported benchmark.
I think you've messed with something haven't ya
Benchmarks mean nothing.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
if you want a great antutu score, get steve PUB aokp rom, it gets 22000
Do not rely on benchmarks. They can be deceiving. If everything you're doing from heavy gaming to basic stuff and the phone is perfectly fine, then the benchmarks are bs.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
italia0101 said:
if you want a great antutu score, get steve PUB aokp rom, it gets 22000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not even close to the best ROM. I have gotten that with PA Android and der kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Eric-1987 said:
That's not even close to the best ROM. I have gotten that with PA Android and der kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its underclocked
i'v flashed stock CM kernel and got 17,600... good enough ...
Please can you explain to me why people are obsessed by numbers ?
Does your phone bug? Does it react in more than one second ? If you have the same phone as me, certainly not.
So why care about benchmarks ?
Sigh
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
italia0101 said:
its underclocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And? Clock speed doesn't mean everything.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 PM ----------
xdafann said:
Please can you explain to me why people are obsessed by numbers ?
Does your phone bug? Does it react in more than one second ? If you have the same phone as me, certainly not.
So why care about benchmarks ?
Sigh
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's more of a test to see what's wrong with the phone. If everyone got 20k and a random selection of people got half that you wouldn't be wondering what is wrong?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app