Mobile Web benchmark - Atrix 4G General

The newest Qualcomm mobile web bench Vellamo, I'd say something new to try, I got 640 on 1.8.3 (froyo)
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

I got 945 on my Galaxy Tab 10.1

Got 722 in GB
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.

I got 610 on 1.8.3. Its shame that samsung's tab carries the same core and ram, and still navigates much, much better, even if you disconsider this benchmark.

KingKuba13 said:
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~

ofek said:
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever used an GS2 and an Atrix side by side? I love our phone man, but there's a reason why the GS2 is 20% more expensive on some countries than the Atrix with it's packed-to-full box and the lapdock together.

slimslim said:
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.

KingKuba13 said:
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

inoskedu8o8 said:
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.

Looks like LG 2x with custom roms is killing this benchmark. 2000 +

KingKuba13 said:
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's running stock. It does beat atrix with cf bench. Atrix beats it with quadrant though. Guys in the evo3d forum that are overclocked at 1.5 are smacking the sgs2 with cf bench. What does this mean in real world performance? Absolutely nothing. C'mon man I thought you knew.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Related

My vibrant took on a g2 in speed test and blew it away

Yesterday my wifes friend got a g2 .I took a look at it and was like this is cool , then I started using it. I didn't know that a g2 had almost as much, if not more lag than a stock vibrant .nerov3 put that g2 to shame. The owner of said g2 was like why is my phone so slow? I was like its a combo of it being slow, and mine being super fast she went to t mobile today and got a vibrant!!! stating the only thing she will miss is the flash camera. now ive got to mod her phone thank goodness for xda and tw !!
Nerov3 voodoo
willsnews said:
Yesterday my wifes friend got a g2 .I took a look at it and was like this is cool , then I started using it. I didn't know that a g2 had almost as much, if not more lag than a stock vibrant .nerov3 put that g2 to shame. The owner of said g2 was like why is my phone so slow? I was like its a combo of it being slow, and mine being super fast she went to t mobile today and got a vibrant!!! stating the only thing she will miss is the flash camera. now ive got to mod her phone thank goodness for xda and tw !!
Nerov3 voodoo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha cool story, now she can be.. PART OF THE GANG.
I did the. Same thing with the guys at work my vibrant running auxora 2. 2 we tried a LG optimis. A droid x and an evo. My vibrant won loaded and played YouTube videos faster opened random apps faster just fooling around but my vibrant was fastest
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
My friends Evo beat mine at playing youtube videos by a split milla-second.
Besides that vibrant tied up with a Droid X
She'll thank you even more when the hinge of the g2 becomes loose after a month
That's funny. I guess that's what happens when you head over to the vibrant forums...
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
I thought the G2 is better phone since the processor is better... I mean stock g2 is not better than Vibrant but once rooted g2 is better
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
dan12288 said:
I thought the G2 is better phone since the processor is better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better how?
dan12288 said:
I thought the G2 is better phone since the processor is better... I mean stock g2 is not better than Vibrant but once rooted g2 is better
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Incorrect.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I've held my sisters g2 and my cousins verizon droid 2 next to my rooted and lagfixed vibrant to compare speeds. My vibrant would load pages just as fast and most times faster than both. Then I compared the speeds of those other 2 phones to my wifes stock vibrant and got the same results. I would run the speed test app on the g2 and my vibrant at the same time and the g2 would score the higher number every time. You would think it being an hspa+ phone it would be quicker with the web browsing but it is just not the case. Those phones are nice phones as well and i wouldn't mind having them, but there is some misinformation going around the interwebs, especially when they start using tests like quadrant standard and the speed test app to measure performance. When it comes to real world use, the vibrant is just as good.
Ar318307 said:
Incorrect.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm acutally go to the G2 forums and they have stable 1.8GHz kernals for the phone
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
beren28 said:
Better how?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably because 2.2 is optimized for the Snapdragon, while we have the hummingbird. However, 2.3 fixes all that and hummingbird is superior to snapdragon in 2.3
shadrock said:
Ummm acutally go to the G2 forums and they have stable 1.8GHz kernals for the phone
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's that battery life over clocked at 1. 8? Did you compare that?
Vibrant Axura 2.2 Voodoo 5 JL5 via the XDA app
I'm just saying this is what happened
Nerov3 voodoo
12paq said:
How's that battery life over clocked at 1. 8? Did you compare that?
Vibrant Axura 2.2 Voodoo 5 JL5 via the XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well.. No i guess you got me there lol. I was just backing up the guy who said the G2 had a better processor
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
shadrock said:
Well.. No i guess you got me there lol. I was just backing up the guy who said the G2 had a better processor
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not better just more overclockable
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
And how about some graphics tests. As far as I know our gpu is the best there is as of now. And I too have ran my nero v3 against an evo. An epic and my wifes mt4g. The one that came close to my speed opening apps and pages was the mt4g cuz I loaded cm6 on it lol
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
robavila721 said:
And how about some graphics tests. As far as I know our gpu is the best there is as of now. And I too have ran my nero v3 against an evo. An epic and my wifes mt4g. The one that came close to my speed opening apps and pages was the mt4g cuz I loaded cm6 on it lol
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You did know that the epic has the same gpu as the vibrant right?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
anthonys2r said:
Probably because 2.2 is optimized for the Snapdragon, while we have the hummingbird. However, 2.3 fixes all that and hummingbird is superior to snapdragon in 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know man, Nexus One running GB is still pumping over 40 MFLOPS in Linpack vs what like 15 on Nexus S
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMY8iDucg6c
FF to 2:10
Alex530 said:
You did know that the epic has the same gpu as the vibrant right?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I do, but the guy had it stock, he was complaining that it would freeze a lot

Post highest Quadrant Score!

Some other phones have this thread so I though i'd put one up for this phone. Post your highest score you received in quadrant! Please post a screenshot! I will start.
My score was 2950; achieved with GladiAtrix.
2950 stock
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Here is mine, 1.5.7 rooted with no other mods.
Nice guys I am really happy with the performance that the Atrix has.
The SGS2 gets 3053 but it has a lower resolution and is clocked 0.2 ghz higher.
I can't wait for overclock.
This was my highest (stock, before GingerBlur or GladiAtrix seemed worthwhile to me). Yeah, its 1 point away...
2958 on Gingerblur.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
2970 after a fresh stock reset
Just wait till GB is released....itll pass SGS2
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
3k on Gingerblur
Wow nice scores, what do you guys use for screenshots?
3351 running a fresh gingerblur install on 1.57.
-
jism31 said:
Wow nice scores, what do you guys use for screenshots?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use Screen Shot It, from the Market.
i used screenshot it as well, but other peoples quality comes out better.
On Antutu I also get about 3300.
That as high as it goes with all the speed booster.
i got 1200
I got 2487 stock using motoblur, any reason why mine is not at 2900 and above?
I got 3449 on AnTutu. Sorry I dont have a screen shot app and I refuse to pay $4 for Screen Shot It when I will basically never use it.
Try downloading speed booster lite and a free sd card speed booster.
DuffmasterFresh said:
I got 2487 stock using motoblur, any reason why mine is not at 2900 and above?
I got 3449 on AnTutu. Sorry I dont have a screen shot app and I refuse to pay $4 for Screen Shot It when I will basically never use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there's a screenshot app that someone from xda developed in the "themes and apps" section that works quite alright
edit: oh what the hell, i was bored, so here's a link to the thread
3471 on antutu
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App

[Benchmark] Post your benchmarks to see who can get the best out of their device

I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
good idea, but without OS informations it is bit worthless. pls update. thx
KulDrive said:
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your post is already flawed since quadrant doesn't have good support for dual core... accuracy may be off. Try ChainFire.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=93702893
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
No quadrant doesn't use both cores use newer bench
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
KulDrive said:
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unless you re-wrote the APK to support both cores, then you're gonna be better off using either Antutu or CF Bench.
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
WiredPirate said:
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
testing antutu one moment please
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
i dont see how the new samsung is better though
it seems to hang when doing the sd read and write im prolly loseing a few points because of my generic sd card
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
oh here is a test with cf bench
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ltdanno360 said:
oh here is a test with cf bench View attachment 741213
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here's my CF Bench (taken on CM7 Pre-beta 2; haven't had a reason to do another one since then)

			
				
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
halfgingghost said:
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow scores like this that beet the sgs2
make me want to flash cm7 stat! only one thing keeps me from it ; my custom webtop; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
freshbakd said:
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1g ram free? How? I only have 893
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Man, just started a similar thread without knowing that this thread was created.
Kinda changed it though into a competition style; I think some people in here may want to post in my thread as well as some people are getting seriously high benchmarks!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1294749
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Phoneguy589 said:
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea hopfully we can get some kinda superkernal 2.5oc to blow sg2 out of the water but i think our phones might blowup first; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

Quadrant finally updated.. post your scores

This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My t-prime got 4500
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Esteway.619 said:
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My result with CM9 v2.1, T132-ICS-CM9 Kernel and CPU set to 200-1000 MHz, ondemand: 2257.
Of course the NS can't mess with an GN, but i'm still impressed how much performance you can gain with custom-roms and -kernels.
I'm running gingerbread deck and the matrix kernel with an overclock to 1.2...(not live oc) and got a score of sound 2966. Hopefully the official 4G build gets ics performance up a little more. I find it hard to believe my device on GB out preforms a galaxy nexus by so much...
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
How are you guys viewing your results? Mine tells me that the next update will include the result browser due to different scores in this version?
you have to except the new shady test result message at the end of the test
im sorry, i really couldnt resist. the sight of this thread to me was like a cat sensing catnip
a cm9 kang with trinity t144, at 1.44ghz
Use to get 3000... sad times....
Nexus S (GSM i9020a)
CM9 Kang (Build 6 of 2.1)
Eugene's Kernel (Speedy-7)
OC 800/100 (conservative)
demo23019 said:
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
even gpu score is whacked considering GN has same sgx540 with a higher clock
yet the stock NS GPU scores higher
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true. More than 2.5 times the Res.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
The power vr540 is a beast.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Sgx540*
Sorry, I'm drunk.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you're right forgot about that
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
Trintity
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So did I, never could determine why...
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kooskoos1814 said:
So did I, never could determine why...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont let the 880mhz in trinity teuv fool you, its as fast as many 1.2ghz kernels.

Antutu Benchmark on S3

Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
spyro0610 said:
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
LiquidNarwhal said:
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you try to your S3?
can bring my device to customer service for them to check?
Mine says triple to !
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
currydude said:
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Why do people just want to number crunch benchmarks? They really mean nothing.... The best benchmark test is how it works in real life, is the OS smooth, do the apps work well on it, any lag at all... That is the best benchmark. Christ, my old HTC desire nearly had the same scores as the stock sensation according to BM scores, in real life however is was lagging like a pig stuck in mud. Lol
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
There is no need to check if its true because its not.
Its probably just detected that one of the cores was turned off at the time.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
spyro0610 said:
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is normal. Antutu definitely looks too low. Are you using anything like setcpu or any power saving apps?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Are you triple core guys using siyah kernel? I use System Panel to monitor my phone and it only shows three active cores. Till now I didn't put much into it though, thinking that it's just because there wasn't enough load to start the fourth core. But maybe there is an issue after all?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
re
hello
well i used to have very random scores varying from 5000 to 12000
yesterday i ran the test and got 12064 but when checking it says dual-core armv7 processor(vf9v3, neon)
also i have another question regarding the processor, shouldnt it be arm v9 ???

Categories

Resources