Some other phones have this thread so I though i'd put one up for this phone. Post your highest score you received in quadrant! Please post a screenshot! I will start.
My score was 2950; achieved with GladiAtrix.
2950 stock
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Here is mine, 1.5.7 rooted with no other mods.
Nice guys I am really happy with the performance that the Atrix has.
The SGS2 gets 3053 but it has a lower resolution and is clocked 0.2 ghz higher.
I can't wait for overclock.
This was my highest (stock, before GingerBlur or GladiAtrix seemed worthwhile to me). Yeah, its 1 point away...
2958 on Gingerblur.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
2970 after a fresh stock reset
Just wait till GB is released....itll pass SGS2
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
3k on Gingerblur
Wow nice scores, what do you guys use for screenshots?
3351 running a fresh gingerblur install on 1.57.
-
jism31 said:
Wow nice scores, what do you guys use for screenshots?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use Screen Shot It, from the Market.
i used screenshot it as well, but other peoples quality comes out better.
On Antutu I also get about 3300.
That as high as it goes with all the speed booster.
i got 1200
I got 2487 stock using motoblur, any reason why mine is not at 2900 and above?
I got 3449 on AnTutu. Sorry I dont have a screen shot app and I refuse to pay $4 for Screen Shot It when I will basically never use it.
Try downloading speed booster lite and a free sd card speed booster.
DuffmasterFresh said:
I got 2487 stock using motoblur, any reason why mine is not at 2900 and above?
I got 3449 on AnTutu. Sorry I dont have a screen shot app and I refuse to pay $4 for Screen Shot It when I will basically never use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there's a screenshot app that someone from xda developed in the "themes and apps" section that works quite alright
edit: oh what the hell, i was bored, so here's a link to the thread
3471 on antutu
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Related
I onlly get like 1100 with a fresh install. I never beat the nexus x
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Check out the benchmark topic in q&a forum, its recently added on the last page of this topic. Quite a story to type over, so check it out yourself.
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
allstate973rd said:
I onlly get like 1100 with a fresh install. I never beat the nexus x
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what rom are you using and what are your settings? overclocked? Sysctl?
SErooted said:
what rom are you using and what are your settings? overclocked? Sysctl?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 6.1.1 V3.2 + Z`s Data2SD
Quadrant 2428
Always nice to not reply on your own topic when people bother to reply... I always imagine how things go when people do that in real life. Entering a shop, asking a question, get a reply and than leaving without saying anything...
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
PollPixx said:
Always nice to not reply on your own topic when people bother to reply... I always imagine how things go when people do that in real life. Entering a shop, asking a question, get a reply and than leaving without saying anything...
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahahahahahaha
excelent
PollPixx said:
Always nice to not reply on your own topic when people bother to reply... I always imagine how things go when people do that in real life. Entering a shop, asking a question, get a reply and than leaving without saying anything...
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Quite Funny.. But if you do ever come back allstate, I think Data2SD will do the trick.
I also get very high with data2sd and wolfbreak's 1.6.3 v4.3 rom. I have got up to 2500, but I'm not sure if it actually makes a difference. I can't tell a real speed difference with or without data2sd other than the quadrant. Without it it is around 1400.
misterwaugh said:
I also get very high with data2sd and wolfbreak's 1.6.3 v4.3 rom. I have got up to 2500, but I'm not sure if it actually makes a difference. I can't tell a real speed difference with or without data2sd other than the quadrant. Without it it is around 1400.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats strange because I too have 6.1.3 v4.3 and without Data2SD I get no more than 1080. And I too dont really think Data2SD does anything with the speed or performance, well none I can notice anyway.
Coming out soon: Data2SD+++ (3800 plus and you can notice a major difference in your phones performance. Its faster than your mind can keep up...)
Get cm6 gingerbread made by jerpelea?I scored 1300 I had 200 free memory using task killer plus free memory recoverer and its battery life is not that bad I can go through a day
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
I get 775 with stock Eclair, Im cool with that. I don't undersand the obsession of getting a high score to beat another phones, if we already know X10 is good.
if you want to get that much quadrant you need to have data2sd install on you phone.Im currently using tripNmiui and i have 2750 quadrant.it fast tho. or you van use free x10 beta 3 & 4.beside you need to install freex10 data2sd too.
900 with stock rom,with link2sd and setr cpu in 998 mhz ondemand
Fake or not? Seems that the scores are highter than the Froyo stock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhdEeu3WUXA
I hope its real and I hope its from someone who will leak it.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
yungboss22 said:
Fake or not? Seems that the scores are highter than the Froyo stock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhdEeu3WUXA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you ask kennethpenn?? By the way the discussion is already going on over in dev section
Sent from my HTC Vision
Scores don't seem too different from froyo. There's a thread in the dev section with preview videos.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1104716
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
I did a CSI analysis on the video....i cannot confirm if it is authentic.
sifon187 said:
I did a CSI analysis on the video....i cannot confirm if it is authentic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm the video is real... Just not so. Certain about the gingerbread man.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Uuh... yea.... i can say i'm running Honeycomb if i want to. Hard to believe a video of something if the only thing remotely close to "proof" is the video title. No settings screen... no nothing.
Recent apps didn't look like the gb blur recent apps on dx also oddly careful not to show any of the os. Pretty sure this is fake
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Zac95 said:
Recent apps didn't look like the gb blur recent apps on dx also oddly careful not to show any of the os. Pretty sure this is fake
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was about to point that out about the recent apps...plus I'm on froyo running ginger blur and have averaged about 58-60 fps on neocore. This is a bogus vid.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
This video is weird... i have 54 on neocore and 40 on nenamark ( 56.7 neocore and 51 nenamark on this video ) why the scores are highter?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
maybe because of some mod of him, got it didyungboss22 ?
like me, i already got over 3000 in quadrant, my higher screenshot is of 2975(qudrant scores btw 2700/2900), when i get 3000+ again, ill get one screenshot and post in here =)
sifon187 said:
I did a CSI analysis on the video....i cannot confirm if it is authentic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you enhance?
the video isn't fake, and the scores are accurate, but it doesn't mean that this particular person is running gingerbread on the atrix, especially since he never shows any part of the new motoblur os. the fact that gingerbread is coming out soon though and is already in testing on the atrix has been proven to us by Kennethpenn, who has real screenshots and video on both the briefmobile site and the thread in the dev section here. whats the point of wasting time argueing over whether a video like this is using the real gingerbread os when you can go get actual info, screenshots, and vids just 3 clicks away
56.7 fps on Neocore, 40.8 fps on Nenamark1, 22.8 fps on Nenamark2, 2539 on Quadrant. Temperature never went over 32 Centigrade/Celsius, back to back tests.
Should add 4.1.83, Gingerbreak, Gladenable, Tenfars CWM, GladiAtrix 3, Cool Blue themed.
The newest Qualcomm mobile web bench Vellamo, I'd say something new to try, I got 640 on 1.8.3 (froyo)
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I got 945 on my Galaxy Tab 10.1
Got 722 in GB
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
I got 610 on 1.8.3. Its shame that samsung's tab carries the same core and ram, and still navigates much, much better, even if you disconsider this benchmark.
KingKuba13 said:
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
ofek said:
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever used an GS2 and an Atrix side by side? I love our phone man, but there's a reason why the GS2 is 20% more expensive on some countries than the Atrix with it's packed-to-full box and the lapdock together.
slimslim said:
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
KingKuba13 said:
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
inoskedu8o8 said:
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Looks like LG 2x with custom roms is killing this benchmark. 2000 +
KingKuba13 said:
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's running stock. It does beat atrix with cf bench. Atrix beats it with quadrant though. Guys in the evo3d forum that are overclocked at 1.5 are smacking the sgs2 with cf bench. What does this mean in real world performance? Absolutely nothing. C'mon man I thought you knew.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
good idea, but without OS informations it is bit worthless. pls update. thx
KulDrive said:
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your post is already flawed since quadrant doesn't have good support for dual core... accuracy may be off. Try ChainFire.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=93702893
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
No quadrant doesn't use both cores use newer bench
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
KulDrive said:
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unless you re-wrote the APK to support both cores, then you're gonna be better off using either Antutu or CF Bench.
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
WiredPirate said:
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
testing antutu one moment please
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
i dont see how the new samsung is better though
it seems to hang when doing the sd read and write im prolly loseing a few points because of my generic sd card
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
oh here is a test with cf bench
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ltdanno360 said:
oh here is a test with cf bench View attachment 741213
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here's my CF Bench (taken on CM7 Pre-beta 2; haven't had a reason to do another one since then)
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
halfgingghost said:
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow scores like this that beet the sgs2
make me want to flash cm7 stat! only one thing keeps me from it ; my custom webtop; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
freshbakd said:
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1g ram free? How? I only have 893
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Man, just started a similar thread without knowing that this thread was created.
Kinda changed it though into a competition style; I think some people in here may want to post in my thread as well as some people are getting seriously high benchmarks!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1294749
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Phoneguy589 said:
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea hopfully we can get some kinda superkernal 2.5oc to blow sg2 out of the water but i think our phones might blowup first; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
dsexton702 said:
These are some tweaks created by dsexton702 that offer you a generous performance boost in I/O and giving you the newest fugu mod 3.1. This is a fast growing tweak and needs to be shared with everyone who can benefit from it
download the U.S.A.Sv6
OP: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1236779
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does work on our phones as I'm using right know...just thought I pass on the good work of these devs...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
What is it like V6SuperCharger?
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
It speeds up and opyimuzes androids Input and output....its just version6 of the mod.....thy have a new version but I haven't tried yet..I've used this on my HTC hd2 and mytouch 4g and know my shift .....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Idk if I posted in right section if not can mod move this please to right one....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
VICODAN said:
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You see I did tweak my ##DATA# setting and use Scarykernel on the latest CM7 nightlies. There's a noticable improvement using V6Supercharger over without on my device.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score with Scary kernel on toasty at 1900mhz?
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Proof that this **** is useless:
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty gov for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.
BTW:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1296614
---------- Post added at 01:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
notsointeresting said:
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
VICODAN said:
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
bigfdaddy said:
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Np.. just saying everytime I flash a nightly I have to do this.. it's annoying as hell where as I just flash ScaryStable once with each nightly flash and I'm good to go and I notice a HUGE difference in performance.
For what it's worth, the V6 Supercharger (currently running the update9 beta) provides an optimal RAM manager which eliminated my habit of installing AutoKiller w/ every ROM. Since running the Supercharger script, I've consistently ran w/ 175-180MB in free RAM w/ no app FC's. That alone is worth using this mod in my book.
Ty 4 trying.....tying to expand this to more people and let them know about it.I.think its worth all the hype and attention I can give it.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium