Hi, my N4 is getting poor benchmarks especially in Antutu....the weird thing is that i'm getting the poor resaults only
in CPU & RAM tests, while in GPU, I/O, SD test are good. in CPU i'm getting ~2000 insted of ~7000
and in RAM i'm getting ~1200 instead of ~2400.... what's wrong with my N4????
i'm on RootBox rom and Matr1x kernel.
see Attached File.
AW: N4 gets poor benchmarks!
Are you on a stock rom? If not, then it may be the kernels fault. I remember when a friend of mine flashed bricked kernel and got scores bader then my galaxy s he flashed back immediately, but while using it (he used it for about a day with a bad kernel) he did not noticed Any difference... When you are on stock, look for apps that run in background and use much CPU time or/and ram.
i think maybe my N4 is using 1 or 2 cores... but it's not explaining the RAM...
i'm on RootBox rom and Matr1x kernel....and i already tried Franco and Bricked and no difference .... so which kernel is the best???
Stock ROM I'm on, I get 17750 so just under the reported benchmark.
I think you've messed with something haven't ya
Benchmarks mean nothing.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
if you want a great antutu score, get steve PUB aokp rom, it gets 22000
Do not rely on benchmarks. They can be deceiving. If everything you're doing from heavy gaming to basic stuff and the phone is perfectly fine, then the benchmarks are bs.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
italia0101 said:
if you want a great antutu score, get steve PUB aokp rom, it gets 22000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not even close to the best ROM. I have gotten that with PA Android and der kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Eric-1987 said:
That's not even close to the best ROM. I have gotten that with PA Android and der kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its underclocked
i'v flashed stock CM kernel and got 17,600... good enough ...
Please can you explain to me why people are obsessed by numbers ?
Does your phone bug? Does it react in more than one second ? If you have the same phone as me, certainly not.
So why care about benchmarks ?
Sigh
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
italia0101 said:
its underclocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And? Clock speed doesn't mean everything.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 PM ----------
xdafann said:
Please can you explain to me why people are obsessed by numbers ?
Does your phone bug? Does it react in more than one second ? If you have the same phone as me, certainly not.
So why care about benchmarks ?
Sigh
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's more of a test to see what's wrong with the phone. If everyone got 20k and a random selection of people got half that you wouldn't be wondering what is wrong?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Related
Hi just got my nexus s and flashed miui. And so far I'm loving it. Can anyone recommend me good kernels?
Thanks
-----------------------------------------
Samsung highlight-iphone3gs-vibrant-g2-nexus one-mytouch 4g-back to vibrant-back to g2- back to mytouch 4g-iphone 4- htc sensation 4g- lg g2x - and finally nexus s
Yea I went through lots of phone and loving this nexus s.
I usually trade phone.
Sent from my Google Nexus S using Tapatalk
Strange, but this is exactly the same thing I did lol.
The moment I got home with my Nexus, I immediately flashed MIUI.
Currently I'm on stock 2.3.7 with Wallet. (I've been wowing everyone at McDonalds and Best Buy with that lol)
I came from the dev failure that was, the Epic 4G.
Matrix or netarchy. I personally use matrix it gives me awesome battery life. But they're different for everyone so you will just have to try them out and see which one works for you.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Trinity. for speed/performance or for battery life, and everything in between. theres a version for all
Apocalypse Talon. Snappy, great battery life. Using it with Cyanogen 7.1. Your mileage may vary.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Welcome to world of nexus s!
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
hugo87 said:
Matrix or netarchy. I personally use matrix it gives me awesome battery life. But they're different for everyone so you will just have to try them out and see which one works for you.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, recently got a NS too. What is your battery life and type of usage? What governor have you set?
simms22 said:
Trinity. for speed/performance or for battery life, and everything in between. theres a version for all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 certainly the best kernel for miui.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Congrats on your new nexus s. Great device.
As for kernels...well from my experience, i would say netarchy all the way for stability and performance combo. Never had any problems with his kernels. Its got all the usual features such as voltage control, voodoo controls etc. Very stable.
Trinity has been good for some but ive found it too unstable more often than not.
Havent really tried the matrix kernels so cant really say.
Have fun!
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Franco kernel is good for cm7 and matr1x kernel is good for almost any rom
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
I use CM7 Nightly Build#229 (Best build yet) with Matr1x Kernel. But i agree that Trinity is the best Kernel for MIUI.
I highly recommend franco's kernel with custom UV settings and the lazy governor. Netarchy has been on hold recently but looks like it might be back in business soon.
try NSCollab ROM + matr1x or franco's kernel
---------- Post added at 07:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:18 AM ----------
themacro said:
I highly recommend franco's kernel with custom UV settings and the lazy governor. Netarchy has been on hold recently but looks like it might be back in business soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you undervolt on franco's kernel? what undervolt settings do you use?
waterface said:
Hi, recently got a NS too. What is your battery life and type of usage? What governor have you set?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have 58% left after 1 day of normal usage with Matr1x kernel with ondemand enabled. I underclocked it to 800Mhz. That's enough to do my everyday stuff. When I game, I put it higher.
Hey EP, long time no see. I just traded my SGS4G for a NS so I guess I'll Be seeing you around. I went with cm.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
golmar88 said:
Hey EP, long time no see. I just traded my SGS4G for a NS so I guess I'll Be seeing you around. I went with cm.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Long time no see!
Sent from my Google Nexus S using Tapatalk
Got one yesterday and very good. Better than my old Epic.
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My t-prime got 4500
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Esteway.619 said:
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My result with CM9 v2.1, T132-ICS-CM9 Kernel and CPU set to 200-1000 MHz, ondemand: 2257.
Of course the NS can't mess with an GN, but i'm still impressed how much performance you can gain with custom-roms and -kernels.
I'm running gingerbread deck and the matrix kernel with an overclock to 1.2...(not live oc) and got a score of sound 2966. Hopefully the official 4G build gets ics performance up a little more. I find it hard to believe my device on GB out preforms a galaxy nexus by so much...
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
How are you guys viewing your results? Mine tells me that the next update will include the result browser due to different scores in this version?
you have to except the new shady test result message at the end of the test
im sorry, i really couldnt resist. the sight of this thread to me was like a cat sensing catnip
a cm9 kang with trinity t144, at 1.44ghz
Use to get 3000... sad times....
Nexus S (GSM i9020a)
CM9 Kang (Build 6 of 2.1)
Eugene's Kernel (Speedy-7)
OC 800/100 (conservative)
demo23019 said:
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
even gpu score is whacked considering GN has same sgx540 with a higher clock
yet the stock NS GPU scores higher
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true. More than 2.5 times the Res.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
The power vr540 is a beast.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Sgx540*
Sorry, I'm drunk.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you're right forgot about that
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
Trintity
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So did I, never could determine why...
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kooskoos1814 said:
So did I, never could determine why...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont let the 880mhz in trinity teuv fool you, its as fast as many 1.2ghz kernels.
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
spyro0610 said:
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
LiquidNarwhal said:
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you try to your S3?
can bring my device to customer service for them to check?
Mine says triple to !
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
currydude said:
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Why do people just want to number crunch benchmarks? They really mean nothing.... The best benchmark test is how it works in real life, is the OS smooth, do the apps work well on it, any lag at all... That is the best benchmark. Christ, my old HTC desire nearly had the same scores as the stock sensation according to BM scores, in real life however is was lagging like a pig stuck in mud. Lol
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
There is no need to check if its true because its not.
Its probably just detected that one of the cores was turned off at the time.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
spyro0610 said:
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is normal. Antutu definitely looks too low. Are you using anything like setcpu or any power saving apps?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Are you triple core guys using siyah kernel? I use System Panel to monitor my phone and it only shows three active cores. Till now I didn't put much into it though, thinking that it's just because there wasn't enough load to start the fourth core. But maybe there is an issue after all?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
re
hello
well i used to have very random scores varying from 5000 to 12000
yesterday i ran the test and got 12064 but when checking it says dual-core armv7 processor(vf9v3, neon)
also i have another question regarding the processor, shouldnt it be arm v9 ???
I don't know if something with the kerner so I tried to install a new kernel, I've been trying many kernels and still the problem... Someone can help me?
No one care about it?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Sr.Keony said:
No one care about it?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We really don't. Benchmarks mean nothing.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
U need to liquid cool the CPU to get higher scores
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
munchy_cool said:
U need to liquid cool the CPU to get higher scores
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol great also on franco I am only getting a max of 170 with linpak so your 150 is fine
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Sr.Keony said:
I don't know if something with the kerner so I tried to install a new kernel, I've been trying many kernels and still the problem... Someone can help me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suggest chainfire method. It's very effective in trouble shooting benchmark performance.
However, if you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 220+ on average stock.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
240 all day here
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
thread is about on how to improve his imaginary benchmark scores that mean nothing because its all about real time performance.
phone feels buttery without any lag? thats good enough for me, i dont need a benchmark to prove that my phone runs faster.
this thread isnt about bragging benchmark results that absolutely mean nothing.
Thanks all of you guys for the advices
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Never received a linpak score below 380 crew checking in
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
I get 967 MFLOPS in multicore Mode.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107558323179602517601/posts/GUsj9wBDwXZ
Hi all
I'm currently running Cyanogenmod with faux's kernel and getting pretty good results, just wondered what other people are using to get great battery life?
Thanks in advance
Sam
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
No such thing as a best kernel. Some phones like certain kernels more than others. Experiences vary.
If you're looking for kernel suggestions I'd go with Franco or Trinity by morfic (Google to find his kernel as it isn't on xda).
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
This is really subjective and is something you would need to test out on your own to get any solid answers since there's so many factors that could affect the outcome.
Thank you but it was just to see what others recommend. I've heard good things about the matrix kernel
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Also when using those kernels download the app trickster mod it'll let you customize the kernel settings but don't touch anything you don't understand because you might mess something up. Franco and morfic have paid apps that customize their kernel but trickster is a free alternative until you commit to one kernel
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Franco or Matrix...But while using Franco Ive seen a big difference in battery and thats just my experience with it but like the others say just try em out and see wats best for you my friend..
alewis2k12 said:
Franco or Matrix...But while using Franco Ive seen a big difference in battery and thats just my experience with it but like the others say just try em out and see wats best for you my friend..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Franco really knows what he's doing, no offense to the other developers. Morfic is another good developer.
Wasn't a huge fan of matrix on the Nexus S. Just my personal opinion (don't attack me because I prefer one kernel over another!)
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
zephiK said:
Agreed. Franco really knows what he's doing, no offense to the other developers. Morfic is another good developer.
Wasn't a huge fan of matrix on the Nexus S. Just my personal opinion (don't attack me because I prefer one kernel over another!)
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to that...
alewis2k12 said:
+1 to that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing against math kid but (not saying he does this) but there are some shady developers or Rom cookers who say they added their secret special tweaks to boost speed or performance. I don't believe it because it's placebo. If there's no proof in the source then it doesn't exist.
Franco actually says what he did, and you can see it in the results. Plus he's very adamant about replying to feedback as long as it's not a silly question like "can I under volt using this kernel???" There's a reason why he has 20k thanks
But either way enough of my rant. Hope op finds a kernel he likes. I'd start using the most popular kernel out there and use it for a couple of days. If you aren't satisfied then try another. Satisfied but want to see if you can do better? Go ahead and try. They're all free anyways, the beauty of xda
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
samwebbo1990 said:
Thank you but it was just to see what others recommend. I've heard good things about the matrix kernel
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using the Matr1x 3.0 kernel I love it but my brother gets battery life on trinity. So like others said its phone specific.
Using Tapatalk 2
Thank you for all your replies, I might give Franco's kernel ago. I'll be surprised if I get better battery life than I currently do on faux's because Franco's doesn't support undervolting
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
alewis2k12 said:
Franco or Matrix...But while using Franco Ive seen a big difference in battery and thats just my experience with it but like the others say just try em out and see wats best for you my friend..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I've tried both, they're efficient but I prefer the franco kernel
samwebbo1990 said:
Thank you for all your replies, I might give Franco's kernel ago. I'll be surprised if I get better battery life than I currently do on faux's because Franco's doesn't support undervolting
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco doesn't support undervolting because,
I answered that the last page. UV comes when I think its a good time for it. I do my own thing, not follow what other people do on their kernels.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=35067141&highlight=undervolt#post35067141
I really don't care much about undervolting, I think in the end its more placebo than anything. Sure it might help a little bit, but not as much as users think it does. Aggressive cpu frequency management, core management, now thats where true savings come from in my opinion.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=35379848&highlight=undervolt#post35379848
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't really undervolt my phone and have pretty good battery life as it is. I didn't undervolt on my Galaxy Nexus either because it had something called Smart Reflex undervolted for you when necessary. more info @ http://www.ti.com/dsp/docs/dspcontent.tsp?contentId=52746#a18
---- Franco isn't saying that there won't be UV support but as of right now he's focused on other things and will add it when it becomes more stable. And I agree with him on the second part about there are other parts of the kernel that can be worked on to have better battery life rather than just having people UV as the solution (for now).
Edit: there's a reason why his thread on GN has Views: 4,859,042 http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p163/gbd270/views_zps2644eff7.jpg
Even there's no UV on his r14, this kernel is very stable and I've a (very) good battery life
I really appreciate all your responses, so what settings do you recommend for best battery life on Franco's kernel?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Out of the box settings work just fine.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
zephiK said:
Out of the box settings work just fine.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On your phone they do they sucked on mine. I went from 2 to 2 1/2 hours to 4 because of a kernel.
Using Tapatalk 2
If takes a couple of recharges for the kernel to come into effect. Have to give if a few days for your phone to get used to it.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
zephiK said:
If takes a couple of recharges for the kernel to come into effect. Have to give if a few days for your phone to get used to it.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u are talking to me Ive had my phone since Thanksgiving I gave it 3 weeks before I flashed a custom kernel. My stock kernel never got any better. U got a awesome stock phone I wish I had the same luck.
Using Tapatalk 2
A suggestion would be to add a poll and let people vote on the different kernels.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app