Hi guys,
Anyone care to share what sort of quadrant and linpack scores they are getting from their blade?
I'm running CM7.1.0 installed via the gen1 to gen2 tpt method.
My quadrant score is 960 and linpack (single thread) is around 9 mflops.
Pretty good score on quadrant for a budget device imo, probably because the graphics are quite good, linpack score exposes the slower cpu though.
Anyone beat those scores?
Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.
1445 points in quadrant standard... see attached screenie-
n3tk0 said:
Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you using?!I only get around 850 no OC in quadrant..
Quadrant Benchmark sucks, use ANTUTU, for a proper Benchmark score. And please mention what roms you are using and what frequency is your processor running at.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium
Even ANTUTU does not give accurate benchmark scores, no mobile benchmark really does. for example users have reported scoring around 200 points for 2D graphics on the galaxy nexus, whereas my ZTE blade scores about 300.
ANTUTU is still more accurate than quadrant.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium
1770 on AnTuTu with newest CM7 Burtslam´s build
Sej last build + wbaw last kernel
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
View attachment 922142
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Gokh said:
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. His build and kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
This is from today evening. Wbaw's KANG and Kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Gokh said:
It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.
wbaw said:
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. But still the scores seem to be pretty high. Maybe because of the overclock. And like you said there is lot of visual improvement in games which Antutu may not calculate accurately.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Related
What's the average score for a evo on cm7 .
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
parmend said:
What's the average score for a evo on cm7 .
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tested at 41.8
Yeah, I would say avg is anywhere from 35 to 42, depending on clock speed. What happens if you run it again right after a couple times?
One time I got and 8, and I was like, WTF? Ran it again and got a 38.
Thanks, I just ran it and it still 16-18. Does the kernal matter. I'm on timat 3.3.7
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
yeah on cm7 I got 40 give or take.
stock sense is like 32 for me and overclocked to 1.2ghz i get 38-39.
bfs kernels were hit or mis on my EVO. Kinda clunky on mine.
I'f you're getting low linpack scores try switching from smartass to conservative(just to score higher). Also I get an average of 41 with my phone clocked at 1190.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Specs in sig, I just got 43.261, average is 42-44.
How do you check?
Arnezie said:
How do you check?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download linpack from the market
mattykinsx said:
Download linpack from the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
32.059
Stock rooted rom
25.59 Destroyed v2 how do i improve that?
39.6
Mik 4.61
Netarchty-toastmod 4.3.1
Setcpu CPU 1190MHZ Very Stable
Quadrant vs linpack? Which one is more important?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
parmend said:
Quadrant vs linpack? Which one is more important?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say definitely linpack. Quadrant is not consistent.
you can get bad scores if you have to many services running. i get 33-35 stock non rooted hw 004. got up to 44+ on my old hw 002(got the restart when overheated problem) when 2.2 first came out, completely stock but since then they have added alot of services that slow it down
if the media scanner is running. i get about 22. so check that in the services if you are getting bad scores
Fricksta said:
25.59 Destroyed v2 how do i improve that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Need more details. What kernel, what CPU settings, etc. I was getting 38-40 on d2.
Just got 40.75 on cm7 with dark horse theme and sz 2.0.0 ondemand 1190
The Linpack app also does not pull enough from CPU to ramp the CPU to max. Set your minimum CPU to the same as your max, run linpack then lower your minimum CPU speed, Interactive is best governor to use for this
all these tests are for is braggin rights...these scores will not be like, oh check it out, my browser loads .3 seconds quicker bc i got 3 more mflops...get out of hee, find a rom you like, and use it, most of them are very good. There is not one rom on this site that blows away the competetion, they are all very very very similiar in speed, nuff said
Hi all, I decided to open up an AnTuTu thread, when my Atrix without cm7 beat a gsii, and a sensation. Then I put CM7 on my Atrix and blew them out of the water. Sheck it!
Yeah I use Antutu as my main benchmark app. My highest was like 5505. Can't wait for a higher OC then we will see higher scores. I've noticed it benches your sdcard so a faster SD card will make your score higher.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Alien4 and stock kernel, my score is 4813.
OMG lol on hd2 I got 800 on 2d grafics xD and 600 on 3d....
EclipseX said:
OMG lol on hd2 I got 800 on 2d grafics xD and 600 on 3d....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha good troll.
Sent from my CM7 Atrix+ 4G using the XDA Premium App
My score 5475 with default test(all)
Atrix INTL, CM7, Kernel faux123-v0.1.7
frag_effect said:
Yeah I use Antutu as my main benchmark app. My highest was like 5505. Can't wait for a higher OC then we will see higher scores. I've noticed it benches your sdcard so a faster SD card will make your score higher.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, and with our internal memory showing as SD card, we have awesome scores for that
Those are great scores! Surprisingly close to the SGSII (My best without OC was 6000 on MIUI with the SGSII.) I remember getting around 3300 points with the Atrix b4 I sold it (it was back in locked 2.2.2 times though...).
bee55 said:
Those are great scores! Surprisingly close to the SGSII (My best without OC was 6000 on MIUI with the SGSII.) I remember getting around 3300 points with the Atrix b4 I sold it (it was back in locked 2.2.2 times though...).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, and we have yet to get a good OC!
Sent from my CM7 Atrix+ 4G using the XDA Premium App
My score 5643
with Atrix alien v4, Kernel-0.1.9
That was my best
l3_Jok3r said:
My score 5643
with Atrix alien v4, Kernel-0.1.9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same ROM/kernel @ 1.2Ghz w/ mild undervolt = 5090, probably held back by relatively slow SD card (7M write 12M reads). Good thing its 32gb...
alien build #4 with fauxs 0.1.9 kernel overclocked to 1.3 ghz and undervolted
i get 6007 with cm7 pre-beta 3 and 1.3 ghz oc
here r my scores. sgs2
Ahaha look at my Atrix score:
I'm on last CM7 Nightly with kernel at 1.6ghz
Is quadrant optimized for quad core tablets? I keep seeing quadrant scores that show phones such as the galaxy s2 and any snapdragon s4 phone. Is our processor just not as fast as the others? Or is tegra 3 not optimized? I know that tegra is great for gaming, but is it as fast as some of the other processors on the market? Thanks
ncvikingx97 said:
Is quadrant optimized for quad core tablets? I keep seeing quadrant scores that show phones such as the galaxy s2 and any snapdragon s4 phone. Is our processor just not as fast as the others? Or is tegra 3 not optimized? I know that tegra is great for gaming, but is it as fast as some of the other processors on the market? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the worst of the Tegra3's, still good VFM for 160-200
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Yeah. So would it be safe to overclock to the full 1.5 ghz? Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quadrant scores aren't really consistent as I've had one test give me 5200 and then a second run giving me 4400 without changing anything. Antutu seems to be more consistent with scores and since the benchmark runs longer, it gives a more accurate result.
Sent from my Nexus 7
Cool. Would an overclock improve performance that much?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah you should see improvement in applications with overclocks. Here is my highest in quadrant so far with _motley 1.0.11 @ 1.7ghz. The version is unstable as a lot of people have reported issues. However, 1.0.10 is pretty good. There are also other kernels in the dev section that are overclocked and should benefit you from the stock kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 7
1.6 GHz:
Cool. Is it safe to overclock to that high? I am thinking 1.4-1.5 ghz
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quadrant never has been to reliable. As I and a few of my buddies have learned, quadrant scores don't mean anything. I have found that cf-bench is quite significantly more accurate and reliable
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Thanks. Any overheating with overclock issues
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he meant inferior CPU and superior i/o.
HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you underclocked?
i got double your cpu score on 1.45ghz
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Managed to get 4.5k quadrant score at 1.45 on the older builds. 4K with 1.3ghz
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
I guess I wasn't clear enough lol
My phone was at stock 1ghz. This was to compare objectively to the bar below the "your device" bar, which was entitled "atrix 4g" which had, yes, superior cpu and inferior i/o scores.
Of course you will get better scores overclocked to 1.45 ghz. Try to understand what I'm asking about. I'll ask more clearly.
Why does a custom rom appear to get a worse cpu score than stock at same clock rate? Shouldn't it be equal or greater?
squee666 said:
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that true? System panel gives independent readouts of the load on each core and they seem to both be working. But if they don't both work in quadrant that would explain it all =) (except why quadrant lol)
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Score I got at 1.3ghz faux kernel on am older version of cm9. Yea quadrant reads that there are 2 cores. Just does not use them properly.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Thanks guys. That does seem to be the issue. Here is a score @ 1gHz with mokee os. Looks pretty obvious that both cores are working here:
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
squee666 said:
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at my blue (ie cpu) bar in this image compared to the image in my first post. I believe it is, in fact, quite obvious. Lol... At least that something is significantly improved cpu-wise...
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
I have not seen the wrong friends .. I developed a new missile with rum was like the Galaxy s3. We have i3 CPU processor equivalent notebooks.
Country : Turkey - Manisa
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Faked.
This thread ****ing sucks.
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Showing off fake does not make you feel any better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2 posts in 4 years @[email protected] Says a lot really LOL
Drakenfall said:
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paintball23456 said:
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Scores with quadrant are equal to none. Its unreliable and even if you get a high or low score it says nothing about your phone
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
nfsmw_gr said:
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Lol this is mine overclocked to 1.6 ghz..... 6264 quadrant...so his score is fake :beer:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
OZAN4545 said:
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
viking37 said:
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
78cortina said:
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hum... Because kayakernel = Siyah kernel... ??? :what: weird
And thanks I know Siyah kernel...
After that if people can't write right a kernel name...
This CPU score of about 28 000 at 1.7 Ghz, even with Siyah kernel, how?, ROM, other tweaks, settings?
I realy don't know how it's possible... Something is strange.
I would like to see an Antutu score, Cf-Bench and Vellamo...
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app
Please share all relevant info please fill in the gaps
ROM:
KERNEL: SIYAH
CPU: 1.7
GPU steps:
Stweaks config:
Just so others can test this for themselves
im what Willis was talking about
.........7 inches
.......ooooooops, my apologies, I thought you said " compare d*ck size"
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Bilux said:
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
slaphead20 said:
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get similar videos all over the net though
《posted from samsung rom》
i think the score.makes sense. he is using the older version of.quadrant
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Tweaked system settings, no big deal good for running one program and nothing else. Like running something with a priority of realtime in Windows.
Pump the CPU to stay at 1.7, run Quadrant exit out go to console raise its nice priority etc, go back and bingo nice big scores!
What's the point of this post, to show all you can use System Tuner or scripts or the console?