Is quadrant optimized for quad core tablets? I keep seeing quadrant scores that show phones such as the galaxy s2 and any snapdragon s4 phone. Is our processor just not as fast as the others? Or is tegra 3 not optimized? I know that tegra is great for gaming, but is it as fast as some of the other processors on the market? Thanks
ncvikingx97 said:
Is quadrant optimized for quad core tablets? I keep seeing quadrant scores that show phones such as the galaxy s2 and any snapdragon s4 phone. Is our processor just not as fast as the others? Or is tegra 3 not optimized? I know that tegra is great for gaming, but is it as fast as some of the other processors on the market? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the worst of the Tegra3's, still good VFM for 160-200
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Yeah. So would it be safe to overclock to the full 1.5 ghz? Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quadrant scores aren't really consistent as I've had one test give me 5200 and then a second run giving me 4400 without changing anything. Antutu seems to be more consistent with scores and since the benchmark runs longer, it gives a more accurate result.
Sent from my Nexus 7
Cool. Would an overclock improve performance that much?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah you should see improvement in applications with overclocks. Here is my highest in quadrant so far with _motley 1.0.11 @ 1.7ghz. The version is unstable as a lot of people have reported issues. However, 1.0.10 is pretty good. There are also other kernels in the dev section that are overclocked and should benefit you from the stock kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 7
1.6 GHz:
Cool. Is it safe to overclock to that high? I am thinking 1.4-1.5 ghz
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quadrant never has been to reliable. As I and a few of my buddies have learned, quadrant scores don't mean anything. I have found that cf-bench is quite significantly more accurate and reliable
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Thanks. Any overheating with overclock issues
Related
Hi guys,
Anyone care to share what sort of quadrant and linpack scores they are getting from their blade?
I'm running CM7.1.0 installed via the gen1 to gen2 tpt method.
My quadrant score is 960 and linpack (single thread) is around 9 mflops.
Pretty good score on quadrant for a budget device imo, probably because the graphics are quite good, linpack score exposes the slower cpu though.
Anyone beat those scores?
Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.
1445 points in quadrant standard... see attached screenie-
n3tk0 said:
Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you using?!I only get around 850 no OC in quadrant..
Quadrant Benchmark sucks, use ANTUTU, for a proper Benchmark score. And please mention what roms you are using and what frequency is your processor running at.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium
Even ANTUTU does not give accurate benchmark scores, no mobile benchmark really does. for example users have reported scoring around 200 points for 2D graphics on the galaxy nexus, whereas my ZTE blade scores about 300.
ANTUTU is still more accurate than quadrant.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium
1770 on AnTuTu with newest CM7 Burtslam´s build
Sej last build + wbaw last kernel
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
View attachment 922142
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Gokh said:
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. His build and kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
This is from today evening. Wbaw's KANG and Kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Gokh said:
It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
karthiknr said:
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.
wbaw said:
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. But still the scores seem to be pretty high. Maybe because of the overclock. And like you said there is lot of visual improvement in games which Antutu may not calculate accurately.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
spyro0610 said:
Hi Guys,
i try to run antutu on my S3 sadly i always got lowes score. and one thing i found out my S3 is only tri-core according to antutu software.
how should i check if this is true?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
LiquidNarwhal said:
holy hell what has happened here? I hope a dev hops over here quickly never seen such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you try to your S3?
can bring my device to customer service for them to check?
Mine says triple to !
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
currydude said:
Report this to the antutu developer. It's an report problem. By the why, but what kind of scores are you getting?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Why do people just want to number crunch benchmarks? They really mean nothing.... The best benchmark test is how it works in real life, is the OS smooth, do the apps work well on it, any lag at all... That is the best benchmark. Christ, my old HTC desire nearly had the same scores as the stock sensation according to BM scores, in real life however is was lagging like a pig stuck in mud. Lol
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
There is no need to check if its true because its not.
Its probably just detected that one of the cores was turned off at the time.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
spyro0610 said:
before i always got 8000 +
now i try again
Quadrant and antutu
find attach file. is this accetable?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is normal. Antutu definitely looks too low. Are you using anything like setcpu or any power saving apps?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Are you triple core guys using siyah kernel? I use System Panel to monitor my phone and it only shows three active cores. Till now I didn't put much into it though, thinking that it's just because there wasn't enough load to start the fourth core. But maybe there is an issue after all?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
re
hello
well i used to have very random scores varying from 5000 to 12000
yesterday i ran the test and got 12064 but when checking it says dual-core armv7 processor(vf9v3, neon)
also i have another question regarding the processor, shouldnt it be arm v9 ???
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he meant inferior CPU and superior i/o.
HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you underclocked?
i got double your cpu score on 1.45ghz
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Managed to get 4.5k quadrant score at 1.45 on the older builds. 4K with 1.3ghz
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
I guess I wasn't clear enough lol
My phone was at stock 1ghz. This was to compare objectively to the bar below the "your device" bar, which was entitled "atrix 4g" which had, yes, superior cpu and inferior i/o scores.
Of course you will get better scores overclocked to 1.45 ghz. Try to understand what I'm asking about. I'll ask more clearly.
Why does a custom rom appear to get a worse cpu score than stock at same clock rate? Shouldn't it be equal or greater?
squee666 said:
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that true? System panel gives independent readouts of the load on each core and they seem to both be working. But if they don't both work in quadrant that would explain it all =) (except why quadrant lol)
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Score I got at 1.3ghz faux kernel on am older version of cm9. Yea quadrant reads that there are 2 cores. Just does not use them properly.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Thanks guys. That does seem to be the issue. Here is a score @ 1gHz with mokee os. Looks pretty obvious that both cores are working here:
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
squee666 said:
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at my blue (ie cpu) bar in this image compared to the image in my first post. I believe it is, in fact, quite obvious. Lol... At least that something is significantly improved cpu-wise...
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
I have not seen the wrong friends .. I developed a new missile with rum was like the Galaxy s3. We have i3 CPU processor equivalent notebooks.
Country : Turkey - Manisa
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Faked.
This thread ****ing sucks.
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Showing off fake does not make you feel any better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2 posts in 4 years @[email protected] Says a lot really LOL
Drakenfall said:
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paintball23456 said:
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Scores with quadrant are equal to none. Its unreliable and even if you get a high or low score it says nothing about your phone
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
nfsmw_gr said:
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Lol this is mine overclocked to 1.6 ghz..... 6264 quadrant...so his score is fake :beer:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
OZAN4545 said:
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
viking37 said:
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
78cortina said:
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hum... Because kayakernel = Siyah kernel... ??? :what: weird
And thanks I know Siyah kernel...
After that if people can't write right a kernel name...
This CPU score of about 28 000 at 1.7 Ghz, even with Siyah kernel, how?, ROM, other tweaks, settings?
I realy don't know how it's possible... Something is strange.
I would like to see an Antutu score, Cf-Bench and Vellamo...
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app
Please share all relevant info please fill in the gaps
ROM:
KERNEL: SIYAH
CPU: 1.7
GPU steps:
Stweaks config:
Just so others can test this for themselves
im what Willis was talking about
.........7 inches
.......ooooooops, my apologies, I thought you said " compare d*ck size"
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Bilux said:
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
slaphead20 said:
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get similar videos all over the net though
《posted from samsung rom》
i think the score.makes sense. he is using the older version of.quadrant
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Tweaked system settings, no big deal good for running one program and nothing else. Like running something with a priority of realtime in Windows.
Pump the CPU to stay at 1.7, run Quadrant exit out go to console raise its nice priority etc, go back and bingo nice big scores!
What's the point of this post, to show all you can use System Tuner or scripts or the console?
Improved 3D Benchmark on Samsung Galaxy Note 3, with Android 4.3 Jelly Bean.
Thanx to ANTUTU Benchamark
Can you also try out Nenamark2 and Epic Citadel and post the results? Maybe even 3dmark if you got the time
ecoEva was
Does Samsung fake score by over clocking?
vansulich said:
Does Samsung fake score by over clocking?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be, But these Results are on Normal Processor speed. No overclocking done. as u see only Graphics Score is improved only
darkchazz said:
Can you also try out Nenamark2 and Epic Citadel and post the results? Maybe even 3dmark if you got the time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great. It seems they're using the newest Mali GPU drivers in 4.3
4.1 gives only 46-48 avg fps in epic citadel.
darkchazz said:
Can you also try out Nenamark2 and Epic Citadel and post the results? Maybe even 3dmark if you got the time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check the Nena Park 2 Benchmark
darkchazz said:
That's great. It seems they're using the newest Mali GPU drivers in 4.3
4.1 gives only 46-48 avg fps in epic citadel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes Mali 400 Drivers Used. Its battery timing is also Improved, as I experienced.
Enviado desde mi ♥ note 2 ♥ www.gadgetsnews.es
great
With Tigra Rom.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
That is really great for user.