Database Users

Evo Quadrant Scores?

Hey guys, post your quadrant scores here please.
I have an Evo with hardware version 003 and my quadrant score is 1212 with the 3.70.651.1 update. (Android 2.2) I'm running stock btw.

Mine's about 1400 and I'm running CM6 with the built in kernel... But I was using Myn's and Fresh over the last week and I didn't get over 1100 with either one of them... But I really couldn't tell a difference in speed, just a different number
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

Just got 1502 using cm7 with savaged zen v005 cfs
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

http://twitpic.com/3v1yf3
not even using snap heh

stiffspliff said:
http://twitpic.com/3v1yf3
not even using snap heh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh miui, you slay me

I get about 1100-1200 depending if my clocks are stock or oced

Time for everyone to retake their tests. New quadrant = alot lower scores... :/
My old scores were:
miui: 1700
savage gb: 1500

i get max ~13xx by using ROm myn's warm twopointtwo RLS 5 and kernel netarchy 4.3.2

I get just over 1000. Check my sig for my rig!

stiffspliff said:
http://twitpic.com/3v1yf3
not even using snap heh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post a link to the ROM that you're using?

speedy0339 said:
Can you post a link to the ROM that you're using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would be happy to.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=915527
(he is one of the devs for miui)

Linpack score of 16mflops

What's the average score for a evo on cm7 .
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

parmend said:
What's the average score for a evo on cm7 .
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tested at 41.8

Yeah, I would say avg is anywhere from 35 to 42, depending on clock speed. What happens if you run it again right after a couple times?
One time I got and 8, and I was like, WTF? Ran it again and got a 38.

Thanks, I just ran it and it still 16-18. Does the kernal matter. I'm on timat 3.3.7
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

yeah on cm7 I got 40 give or take.
stock sense is like 32 for me and overclocked to 1.2ghz i get 38-39.
bfs kernels were hit or mis on my EVO. Kinda clunky on mine.

I'f you're getting low linpack scores try switching from smartass to conservative(just to score higher). Also I get an average of 41 with my phone clocked at 1190.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App

Specs in sig, I just got 43.261, average is 42-44.

How do you check?

Arnezie said:
How do you check?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download linpack from the market

mattykinsx said:
Download linpack from the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks

32.059
Stock rooted rom

25.59 Destroyed v2 how do i improve that?

39.6
Mik 4.61
Netarchty-toastmod 4.3.1
Setcpu CPU 1190MHZ Very Stable

Quadrant vs linpack? Which one is more important?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

parmend said:
Quadrant vs linpack? Which one is more important?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say definitely linpack. Quadrant is not consistent.

you can get bad scores if you have to many services running. i get 33-35 stock non rooted hw 004. got up to 44+ on my old hw 002(got the restart when overheated problem) when 2.2 first came out, completely stock but since then they have added alot of services that slow it down
if the media scanner is running. i get about 22. so check that in the services if you are getting bad scores

Fricksta said:
25.59 Destroyed v2 how do i improve that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Need more details. What kernel, what CPU settings, etc. I was getting 38-40 on d2.

Just got 40.75 on cm7 with dark horse theme and sz 2.0.0 ondemand 1190

The Linpack app also does not pull enough from CPU to ramp the CPU to max. Set your minimum CPU to the same as your max, run linpack then lower your minimum CPU speed, Interactive is best governor to use for this

all these tests are for is braggin rights...these scores will not be like, oh check it out, my browser loads .3 seconds quicker bc i got 3 more mflops...get out of hee, find a rom you like, and use it, most of them are very good. There is not one rom on this site that blows away the competetion, they are all very very very similiar in speed, nuff said

Antutu benchmark scoring

Just thought you guys should submit your scores, I find it hard to believe my atrix is the highest score. My score is 6165. Someone beat me!

Wow. Lame. Hope you feel better.
I voided my warranty and your mum.

Lol I just wanted to entice competition, see what scores people are getting. What to expect from different ROMs and clockspeeds.
I piss excellence

Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

ill play later lol!

Sass86 said:
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your setup?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Cm7, fauxs 020 kernel 1.3ghz. I saw some guy actually was ahead of me by 20 points, clocked at 1ghz... that's impressive! How did he do that?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

Welcome to the world of benchmarking.
I voided my warranty and your mum.

Sass86 said:
Cm7, fauxs 020 kernel 1.3ghz. I saw some guy actually was ahead of me by 20 points, clocked at 1ghz... that's impressive! How did he do that?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He probably set his min and max to 1000Mhz, which is pointless.

Samsung galaxy s2 top 1 score
ITALY at TOP

Magggggruuuubbber

#1 if u ain't first ur last
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

just got 6710 with faux's 1.45GHz overclock on CM7.. didn't set my CPU to max max either.. how'd u get such fast SD card speeds though! they are what killed my score! D:

DarkRyoushii said:
just got 6710 with faux's 1.45GHz overclock on CM7.. didn't set my CPU to max max either.. how'd u get such fast SD card speeds though! they are what killed my score! D:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buy a good, speedy SDCard and not generic class 2-4 ones

Here is mine... Thanks to all the DEVS!!!
CM7.1 ¬B^¬N and Faux's latest 2.1 1.45ghz

Haven't tried any of the old tricks yet
Apparently if you put your device in airplane mode and do some other tweaks you can squeeze more out, but I have to say I was pleasantly surprised when I saw 6815. My SD card write is what is confusing me. Before the stop-gap CM7 I could have sworn it was ~100 or more, but now it is ~60 at best.

6813 on casual bench. Sorry can't post links yet.
CM7 with faux 1.3ghz kernel. Cache 4096, vm heap 32, databases converted to WAL (huge sd boost), sysctl mods (though doubt they help much on bench):
vm.vfs_cache_pressure = 10
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 70
vm.dirty_ratio = 90
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 1500
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 1500
vm.min_free_kbytes = 4096
vm.oom_kill_allocating_task = 0
About to flash fauxs 1.45 and stage a proper bench.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

turl1 said:
Buy a good, speedy SDCard and not generic class 2-4 ones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the read write speeds of the sdcard you get from antutu i believe are for the internal memory. i read in a few places this is the case plus to verify it i removed my external and received the same score. i also have a class 10 external sdcard.

gentledroid17 said:
the read write speeds of the sdcard you get from antutu i believe are for the internal memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya its internal. Also, SD read/write speeds can be increased by upwards of 100% by using Titanium Backup to convert all databases to WAL. Do a full backup prior.
Here's my benchmarks. Hit 6846 in antutu. If I read right its highest atrix bench on antutu?
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-dd75-5f56.jpg
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-dd9c-40c6.jpg
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-ddbf-e028.jpg
tapatalk.com/mu/62b1ab7e-ddd9-348e.jpg
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Sorry... not the highest...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1294749&page=8
I don't understand well the Sysctl settings, do you have a link about it ?

Cm7 cpu quadrant

How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app

=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.

HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he meant inferior CPU and superior i/o.

HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you underclocked?
i got double your cpu score on 1.45ghz

Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Managed to get 4.5k quadrant score at 1.45 on the older builds. 4K with 1.3ghz
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91

I guess I wasn't clear enough lol
My phone was at stock 1ghz. This was to compare objectively to the bar below the "your device" bar, which was entitled "atrix 4g" which had, yes, superior cpu and inferior i/o scores.
Of course you will get better scores overclocked to 1.45 ghz. Try to understand what I'm asking about. I'll ask more clearly.
Why does a custom rom appear to get a worse cpu score than stock at same clock rate? Shouldn't it be equal or greater?
squee666 said:
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that true? System panel gives independent readouts of the load on each core and they seem to both be working. But if they don't both work in quadrant that would explain it all =) (except why quadrant lol)
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app

Score I got at 1.3ghz faux kernel on am older version of cm9. Yea quadrant reads that there are 2 cores. Just does not use them properly.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91

Thanks guys. That does seem to be the issue. Here is a score @ 1gHz with mokee os. Looks pretty obvious that both cores are working here:
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app

Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91

squee666 said:
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at my blue (ie cpu) bar in this image compared to the image in my first post. I believe it is, in fact, quite obvious. Lol... At least that something is significantly improved cpu-wise...
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app

Fastest rom n kernel score if u bored

This is with justworks rom and dodge kernel 1.6 @ 1.9
4342 antutu
Whats your fastest? (if you're bored)

That's awesome for a Sense ROM.

UKE
UKE rom with dodge 1.6.
4530 at 1.9. Locked up right after the test though
4373 at 1.8

Mine locks up almost any time I go above 1.7 ghz, sometimes I can do 1.8 ghz

newSENSE @1.728 ghz

This is Supreme Sense XII.

Chad The Pathfinder said:
This is Supreme Sense XII.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice .

kushdeck's CM10 @1497

Wow!

junpei1337 said:
kushdeck's CM10 @1497
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very nice

SensuAOSP @ 1497
Sent from my [email protected]$$ EVO Shift

They must have changed the algorithm used to generate scores in antutu, I am getting extreme scores now compared to a while back...
Both screenies are from my cm10 rom using conservative/deadline
1st is @ 1.4gz
2nd is @ 1.7gz

that cm10 ROM is great but if I go over 1497 it crashes. As a side note supreme sense is still my go to rom

x2
prboy1969 said:
Nice .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
X2

sheeeet
junpei1337 said:
kushdeck's CM10 @1497
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dats fast!

[email protected] ghz

hmm
BigSplit said:
They must have changed the algorithm used to generate scores in antutu, I am getting extreme scores now compared to a while back...
Both screenies are from my cm10 rom using conservative/deadline
1st is @ 1.4gz
2nd is @ 1.7gz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i ran the same settings as u twice best i got was 3400, and 3598 on performance

trsix said:
i ran the same settings as u twice best i got was 3400, and 3598 on performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What class of sd card do u have... that could have a drastic effect in antutu scores.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda app-developers app

Something I am working on (JB). @1.6 ghz/ class 2 SD card

BigSplit said:
What class of sd card do u have... that could have a drastic effect in antutu scores.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See I never test the SD, because that's not performance of the phone, but on a side note I was reading that class 2 and 4 SanDisk are about the best to have because of random read/write speeds. The class 10 are of course faster in r/w BUT class 10 cards cut most of the random speeds out to achieve a higher class/speed.
The other day I transferred ubuntu_small.zip ( linux on android ) its 1.3 GB and it took about 3 minutes to transfer to my 32GB class 4
Sent from my myTouch_4G_Slide using Tapatalk 2