Introduction:
This thread suggests several build.prop entries that supposedly increase your 3g speeds:
[mod]Boosting Signal Strength (hspa/gprs)
After doing nearly 100 benches with the speedtest app, I have come to a couple conclusions:
The server your connect to for speedtest has the greatest impact on your speeds (network congestion)
The majority of the values given dont even exist by default on the device
Your battery charge might have more influence over speeds then any tweaks
Device defaults:
Code:
ro.ril.hsxpa=2
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
ro.ril.hep=" "
ro.ril.enable.dtm=" "
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=" "
ro.ril.hsupa.category=" "
ro.ril.enable.a53=" "
where " " means that the value isnt defined.
ro.ril.hsxpa: Defines weither to use UMTS, HSPDA/UMTS, or HSDPA/HSPUA respectively.
ro.ril.gprsclass: Defines what class speeds to use with edge. (12 is maximum defined in standard?)
ro.ril.hep: unknown and undefined
ro.ril.enable.dtm: Dual transfer mode (only relevent for EDGE connections, likely always enabled for devices built after 2010)
ro.ril.hsdpa.category: class 8 matches the max download rate
ro.ril.hsupa.category: class 6 matches the max upload rate
ro.ril.enable.a53: supposedly related to GSM security, no actual info (may not even exist)
Anything not listed is completely irrelevent.
Test setup:
PC on wireless-n
Streak 5 on wireless-g
Streak 5 switched to HSPA
ROM: CM7.2-rc0
Kernel: Phoenix kernel for CM7.2
BB: 406-2 (407)
Testing methodology:
Test 5/10 times on control
Make change via terminal and setprop
Enter and exit airplane mode
Do run
Undo mod and do control
Repeat for all
Do again, but make change via build.prop edits
Restart 3 times
Do run
Do control tests
Controls:
PC over landline:
Code:
Ping Down Up
77 2.18 4.8
63 2.11 7.98
97 2.49 5.85
63 3.07 7.6
92 3.26 7.55
49 2.71 7.17
50 2.54 7.49
55 2.8 7.28
65 2.39 7
40 2.51 4.91
Phone over wifi over landline:
Code:
Ping Down Up
90 2.91 7.06
54 3.23 6.53
84 3.38 7.73
72 3.7 9.03
51 4.04 7.62
Phone over 3g while charging:
Code:
Ping Down Up
146 0.45 0.24
786 0.29 0.18
95 0.29 0.23
966 0.28 0.29
114 0.63 0.32
886 0.27 0.15
100 0.27 0.19
837 0.38 0.34
826 0.44 0.51
896 0.21 0.56
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8
Code:
96 1.58 1.24
106 1.56 1.56
911 1.55 1.35
101 1.96 1.82
916 1.63 1.41
Control after testing above:
Code:
125 0.48 1.01
914 0.27 0.61
110 0.69 0.9
146 0.17 0.18
108 1.1 0.73
ro.ril.hsupa.category=6
Code:
118 0.86 1.45
807 0.73 1.23
116 0.94 1.16
896 0.95 1.12
102 0.93 0.94
Control after testing above:
Code:
778 0.8 1.24
792 0.79 1.36
124 0.75 1.28
828 0.72 1.21
109 0.72 1.31
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8 and ro.ril.hsupa.category=6
Code:
97 1.16 1.42
932 0.81 1.42
98 0.86 1.41
876 0.88 1.33
829 0.8 1.21
Control after testing above:
Code:
778 0.8 1.24
792 0.79 1.36
124 0.75 1.28
828 0.72 1.21
109 0.72 1.31
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8 and ro.ril.hsupa.category=6 and ro.ril.hsxpa=5
Code:
126 1.16 1.41
824 0.87 1.08
795 1.08 1.06
127 0.98 1.05
116 0.73 1.18
Control after testing above:
Code:
1019 0.56 1.19
789 0.75 0.64
117 0.46 0.92
895 0.68 1.27
916 0.31 0.46
Conclusion:
A google search shows that ro.ril.enable.a53 may not even exist besides self references to it's own speed tweaks, it may very well not even exist.
The same can be said about ro.ril.hep.
ro.ril.enable.dtm may be irrelevent as DTM allows you to use voice and data at the same time, and this technology only applies to edge.
This is likely implicitly always enabled for any device that supports it past 2010, as only the earliest 3g devices may not have had support for it.
ro.ril.hsxpa=2 and ro.ril.gprsclass=12 are likely already correctly definied for it (with it being a HSPA device)
Bar ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8 and ro.ril.hsupa.category=6, the rest of them are not valid to begin with.
I was able to achieve much higher speeds by switching servers, and all tests were intentionally done on the same server for consistancy.
Those values do canonically exist on other devices, but they're never defined on the S5.
Just as much my speeds varied wildly even from control to control, as much as doubling from the lowest common to highest common.
ro.ril.hsdpa.category and ro.ril.hsupa.category might potentially give an increase in speeds, but as they dont even have default values, they might not even be valid.
I cant even reproduce some of the results from enabling only ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8, as I restart the device after each change to be sure.
I may have inadvertantly connected to a faster server for that one instance.
tl;dr: you get as much speed increases from CHANGING THE THEME ICON TO DISPLAY 4G, you can also make stuff up and pretend it does something and let the placebo effect do all the work for you.
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=8 and ro.ril.hsupa.category=6, might do something, but they could very well be invalid.
thank you, great work
I'll get right on that! I'll make a sticker for my DS5 that says its 4G LTE+ ;P
Thankyou for the thorough testing, now what about vmheap?
Sent from my Dell Streak using Tapatalk 2
I dont intend on testing it, it's default size never changes for any device, regardless of ram size. I assume goog knows what they're doing in respect to that, as manus can and do add in their own optimizations into their roms, and they still leave those values alone more or less.
Related
Test your PIE speed here
http://www.dslreports.com/mspeed?jisok=1
and post your result, to include
1. Carrier
2. ROM/Cooked ROM Version
3. Radio Version
4. Average result (Minimum 3 test)
This will enable us to find out which radio works best on a particular ROM.
My ist test results using the 1MB test load.
1st run - 846 kbits
2nd run - 976 kbits
3rd run - 974 kbits
Average 932 kbits
ROM used 1.25.405.1 WWE
Radio 1.58.25.14
reyjabs said:
Test your PIE speed here
http://www.dslreports.com/mspeed?jisok=1
and post your result, to include
1. ROM Version
2. Radio Version
3. Average result (Minimum 3 test)
This will enable us to find out which radio works best on a particular ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here we go
1. 1.28.405.1 WWE
2. 1.58.25.14
3. 188kbit/sec
as the size file increases there is an increase in the speed. e.g. 100k 154kbit/sec, 1mb 194kbit/sec.
Jackster said:
here we go
1. 1.28.405.1 WWE
2. 1.58.25.14
3. 188kbit/sec
as the size file increases there is an increase in the speed. e.g. 100k 154kbit/sec, 1mb 194kbit/sec.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now that's weird! This is not an HSDPA speed. It should be between 384 to 1 m. Is your device displaying an "H" when you conducted the test?
With 3G, EDGE or WLAN-DSL? Or doesn't matter?
qwasdenn said:
With 3G, EDGE or WLAN-DSL? Or doesn't matter?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should be HSDPA/UMTS or 3G
reyjabs said:
Now that's weird! This is not an HSDPA speed. It should be between 384 to 1 m. Is your device displaying an "H" when you conducted the test?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's 3G. no HSDPA around here yet. i tested it a bit more and the speed decreased even more. I'll check with my network to see if there's any probs.
1. 1.28.405.1 WWE
2. 1.58.25.14
3. 732 kbit/sec
1mb size file with opera 9.33.
Such tests are also network dependant
TheOnly1 said:
Such tests are also network dependant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe he meant test to be conducted for those who has an H or 3G signal on their phone and does'nt necessarily mean network as the unit uses any available signal within the immediate vicinity but I could be wrong. On the other hand , it's best to use the Pocket Internet explorer because we already know that opera is faster than PIE.
That's weird. I did the test and 1 only got
1. 7 kbits
2. 12 kbits
3. 5 kbits
What's wrong with my TC?
looks like normal GPRS speeds rather then 3g or HSDPA
maybe your operator dont offer hsdpa or it's not enabled for your acount
kutonglupa said:
That's weird. I did the test and 1 only got
1. 7 kbits
2. 12 kbits
3. 5 kbits
What's wrong with my TC?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rudegear is right. BTW what's your connection icon? Is it G, 3G?
Hmmmm
o2 UK
ROM 1.25.405.1 WWE
RADIO 1.58.21.23
AVERAGE 123kbps
This is on my brand new 3G SIM activated today, and H is active. Lame.
Test conducted using Bepe's V0.54 Special Edition ROM.
Radio 158.25.14
Test 1. 1084
Test 2. 1112
Test 3. 1080
Average - 1092 kbits/sec
SIM used - Vodafone 3G
Test area - Tower Bridge
Speed fluctuation is quite impressive. The best so far to date.
1. T-Mobile NL PIT (normal version)
2. v0.53 Bepe UK
3. 1.58.25.14
4. 653 kbit/sec
Rom: 1.25.405.1
radio: 1.58.21.23
HSDPA 1.mega file
502 kbit/sec 0,742s latency
I'm interested to know how many o2 UK customers are getting decent rates...
dekonass said:
Rom: 1.25.405.1
radio: 1.58.21.23
HSDPA 1.mega file
502 kbit/sec 0,742s latency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What carrier SIM did you use?
reyjabs said:
Test conducted using Bepe's V0.54 Special Edition ROM.
Radio 158.25.14
Test 1. 1084
Test 2. 1112
Test 3. 1080
Average - 1092 kbits/sec
SIM used - Vodafone 3G
Test area - Tower Bridge
Speed fluctuation is quite impressive. The best so far to date.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How come mine's not getting this figure? I'm using the same ROM!
I want this speed please
I am sorry, but speed has nothing to do with wich rom you use. I dont know who is telling you this story. The radio version COULD help something in case of better connection.
...and now for a Bell I9000M issue which doesn't involve a corrupt SD card..
I'm running Doc's JK3.
I've noticed for the last month that when I tether with my laptop (and/or my wife's) via WiFi I get a number of web pages which don't load "correctly" (I'd say 30%). The content of the web pages load, but the formatting is all messed up and usually, it's all in a single column.
For example, if I browsed to Microsoft.com, all the links would be in the left-hand side and just in plain text like I was browsing with an old text-only web browser. The rest of the website is below and is all messed up.
Thoughts?
Thanks!!
Riley
Well, this is strange.. Don't think I've ever seen a trace like this..
Code:
C:\Users\Riley>tracert 208.67.222.222
Tracing route to resolver1.opendns.com [208.67.222.222]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 192.168.43.1
2 340 ms 448 ms 429 ms 10.251.34.17
3 420 ms 551 ms 424 ms resolver1.opendns.com [208.67.222.222]
4 571 ms 419 ms 468 ms 10.251.93.1
5 325 ms 408 ms 300 ms 142.165.29.131
6 496 ms 1082 ms 129 ms te-4-2.car4.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.71.156.101]
7 118 ms 107 ms 110 ms SPLICE-COMM.car4.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.71.156.130]
8 110 ms 109 ms 109 ms resolver1.opendns.com [208.67.222.222]
Trace complete.
Code:
C:\Users\Riley>tracert 8.8.8.8
Tracing route to google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 192.168.43.1
2 74 ms 40 ms 39 ms 10.251.34.25
3 44 ms 44 ms 43 ms google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
4 46 ms 46 ms 48 ms 10.251.93.1
5 374 ms 38 ms 39 ms 142.165.29.131
6 77 ms 75 ms 76 ms 74.125.48.249
7 75 ms 84 ms 75 ms 216.239.47.114
8 141 ms 94 ms 95 ms 216.239.46.170
9 460 ms 489 ms 459 ms 72.14.239.93
10 775 ms 665 ms 561 ms 72.14.236.200
11 112 ms 106 ms 107 ms 72.14.232.21
12 * 219 ms 115 ms google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
Trace complete.
It seems to be tracing twice? I don't know what to make of that..
Riley
Well, I think I may have solved my own issue (I hope!!)..
I came across one other post on another forum talking about the WiFi location causing issues. Apparently, if you have the phone updating your location using WiFi then it will cause issues around every 10 minutes when it tries to search for hotspots to update your location.
I think that since the phone has to disable WiFi to enable MobileAP the phone needs to switch it back on for the few seconds it checks your location. This causes all sorts of wired things to happen.
Since turning WiFi location off (in Settings->Location-> use WifFi Network) I have only had a small number of issues, probably since I'm in the edge of service. It's been markedly better.
Thanks!!
Riley
Well, I guess I'm not so lucky.. Problem remains..
Though, I'm thinking it's a carrier issue (Sasktel). I decided to update to Doc's JPY ROM with the Bell JK4 modem to see if that solved things. It did not.
For the most part, web paged load well, but I still have the problems from my first post and some web pages (mls.ca) don't load properly - ever. The interactive maps don't work.
So, I setup a VPN connection into my office. Lo and behold everything works perfectly then. Web pages load well and mls.ca starts working..
There is a thread over at Howard Forums with some other users having similar problems with other websites like Flikr. So, it appears Sasktel is mangling the traffic somehow. I'm going to give them a call tomorrow and see what I can find out.
Riley
I called Sasktel and I guess it's a known issue. Some of the problems I listed they said they've known about "since day one" when the launched the new 3G network in August..
I guess that means it's not much of a priority for them then if it's still broken 6 months later.....
Riley
There was recently a WP7 benchmarking app called WP BENCH released in the market and I am interested to see how the stock sd card is functioning compared to the user replaced sd cards. The benchmark consists of 3 main parts. These are CPU, DATA and GPU.
Stock 16GB SD Card (NoDo)
*non typical result
CPU
Sequential: 21558*-10875 ms
Parallel: 13058*-10312 ms
Data
memory: 13.07-9.8* MB/s
storage: 3.56-0.19* MB/s
GPU
Frames: 698-666*
avg: 23-22 FPS
Here are my results. DVP unlocked 8GB NoDo Tmo USA. Base on my 5 tests, the Storage speed on test #1 is .25MB/s and the others are ~3MB/s+.
Test #1 with reboot
Sequential 10888ms, Parallel 10470ms
Memory 13.07MB/s, Storage 0.25MB/s
694 frames, avg: 23FPS
Updates:
Test #2 no reboot
Sequential 10859ms, Parallel 10404ms
Memory 13.07MB/s, Storage 3.27MB/s
676 frames, avg: 22FPS
Test #3 no reboot
Sequential 10938ms, Parallel 10414ms
Memory 13.07MB/s, Storage 3.02MB/s
689 frames, avg: 23FPS
Test #4 with reboot and #5 without reboot
results were consistant with tests #2 and #3.
My storage on DVP 8GB no-do was 3MB/s
kartbart said:
My storage on DVP 8GB no-do was 3MB/s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here on my pre-nodo 8GB DVP.
FWIW I also tried on a stock Samsung Focus (no SD card, no updates) and got 2.6MB/s.
I have a 32GB Transcend card (upgraded 16GB model), no NoDo (OS version 7008).
CPU
Sequential : 10892
Parallel: 10552
Data:
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 1.56 MB/s
GPU:
640 frames, 21FPs
Replaced stock 16GB card with another class (6) SanDisk 16GB from RadShack
NoDo
CPU
time: 21292 ms
Sequential: 10856 ms
Parallel: 10436 ms
Data
time: 17442
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.02 MB/s
GPU
Frames: 692
avg: 23 FPS
Did 2 runs on my stock 16gb DVP w/ NoDo
CPU
sequential: 11014, 12584 ms
parallel: 10462, 11296 ms
DATA @ 0.8 MB
memory: 13.07, 13.07 MB/s
storage: 0.09, 0.35 MB/s <-- huge variability!
GPU
699 avg 23, 692 avg 23 FPS
Installed NoDo on my 8GB and now getting 3.25MB/s pretty reliably. Pre-NoDo was 3.0MB, so results didn't change much and are probably within the margin of error.
16GB Stock card....
First Run:
Memory : 13.07mb/s
Storage : 0.14mb/s
Second Run:
Memory : 12.9 mb/s
Storage : 0.19mb/s
Third Run:
Memory : 9.8 mb/s
Storage : 0.13 mb/s
So am I to believe that the 'Memory' test was for reading and the 'Storage' was for writing?
If this is the case, these damn cards are as defective as could be. I know 2 other guys with Venue Pro 16 GB and they both have the same problem.
How the hell do they get an entire warehouse of defective cards? Did they buy these things refurbished?
Here are my stats based on a 8GB stock Dell Venue Pro pre-nodo:
Test #1 - Power Off & Power On
CPU: Sequential 10866 / Parallel 10471 - 21337ms
DATA: Memory 13.07 / Storage 3.56 - 14810ms
GPU: Frames 694 / Average 23
Test #2 - after 15 minutes of browsing & calls
CPU: Sequential 10868 / Parallel 10470 - 21338ms
DATA: Memory 13.07 / Storage 0.53 - 77737ms
GPU: Frames 692 / Average 23
Test #3 - after 30 minutes of idle
CPU: Sequential 10884 / Parallel 10468 - 21352ms
DATA: Memory 13.07 / Storage 3.56 - 15007ms
GPU: Frames 681 / Average 23
manually replaced with Sandisk 32G Class 2 after NoDo (changed dehydrateonpause to 0):
Test 1 @ 0.8m:
Memory 13.07m
Storage 3.27m
Frame:668 average:22 FPS
Test 2 @ 0.8m：
Memory 13.07m
Storage 3.02m
Frame:660 average:22 FPS
So who's got the best 32gb sd card?
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820220452&cm_re=32gb-_-20-220-452-_-Product
And will a class 10 word, or does it have to be 2?
Updated my 16gb DVP w/ NoDo to 32gb Sandisk class 2
Did 2 test runs immediately after
1) installing 32gb micro sdhc
2) set up phone
3) set up all my accounts
4) installed 60 apps & games over wifi
5) synced with PC, copying pictures, videos, and songs totalling 11 GB
AND I HAVEN'T FROZEN OR HAD TO REBOOT ONCE!!!
CPU
sequential: 11049, 11068 ms
parallel: 10486, 10322 ms
DATA @ 0.8 MB
memory: 13.07, 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.27, 3.27 MB/s <-- MUCH IMPROVED!
GPU
23, 22 avg FPS
Also, the ##634# CIT sd card test now shows status 0 OK.
All in all, I'd say the sd card swap was a huge success.
I got a class 4 SanDisk from Amzn and the write speed dropped (from previous 8 GB SanDisk class 4) from 3 MB/s to 0.64 MB/s.
Update: Ok, just reinstalled and re-ran the WP Bench app - and data performance shows 13.07 MB/s for reads and 3.27 MB/s for write. I say the WP Bench app has issues
For those interested, I posted about my experience in upgrading to a 32gb card.
kartbart said:
I got a class 4 SanDisk from Amzn and the write speed dropped (from previous 8 GB SanDisk class 4) from 3 MB/s to 0.64 MB/s.
Update: Ok, just reinstalled and re-ran the WP Bench app - and data performance shows 13.07 MB/s for reads and 3.27 MB/s for write. I say the WP Bench app has issues
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You´re right. It happens to me as well. I have a Samsung Focus, NoDo installed (with Chevron.Updater), and a Sandisk 16Gb Class 4 loaded with 13Gb.
The storage speed varies from 0,18 to 4.9mb/s but the higher speeds (above 3mb/s) I only got during the first 3 or maybe 4 times running Wp Bench.
Nevertheless, the usage of my device has no lags at all, even when WP Bench shows a slow storage speed.
So, I think that this odd speed variation is due to a WP Bench´s issue or, even if it doesn´t has an issue, the way that WP7 manages the device´s memory is causing this odd behavior on WP Bench´s speed results.
What I do see - and I've seen others post about it as well is that when you download large apps (Fruit Ninja, Star Wars game, etc), the phone grinds to a halt. I didn't have to pull the battery, but I did have to do a power-off/on. I noticed that leaving the phone in the download screen helps - takes a looooong time to download but it does eventually finish.
Don't know if DVP firmware or Mango or something else is needed to address this.
I do have 14 of 32 filled.
kartbart said:
What I do see - and I've seen others post about it as well is that when you download large apps (Fruit Ninja, Star Wars game, etc), the phone grinds to a halt. I didn't have to pull the battery, but I did have to do a power-off/on. I noticed that leaving the phone in the download screen helps - takes a looooong time to download but it does eventually finish.
Don't know if DVP firmware or Mango or something else is needed to address this.
I do have 14 of 32 filled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems that you´re having a microsd card incompability with your device. Check this thread below where I have recommended a microsd card that doesn´t present any incompability issues like slowness, auto-resets and data loss.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=834144&page=103
Here's the test results for my custom 32gb DVP w/ FW 212 & Mango 7712
CPU
sequential: 8251 ms (improved from 11055)
parallel: 7792 ms (improved from 10400)
DATA @ 0.8 MB
memory: 13.07 MB/s (same)
storage: 13.07 MB/s (improved from 3.27?!)
GPU
23 avg FPS (same)
Looks like either the new mango or the new FW really boosted my cpu and data/storage scores... anybody else care to share results? I'm interested to see what improved with just the new FW, so if somebody can run the test on NoDo w/ and w/o the new FW that'd be great.
Hey guys!
Here's a quite subjective test I've just performed today.
I've tested the modems that you can find in the Omega files app, by taking 3 wifi and 3 network download tests using the Speedtest app.
I have ignored the network tests with very high latency(>600).
Also, the wifi test is very subjective, as it is a workplace network, so it massively relies on other user's usage.
I am on Vodafone UK, and the test was done in central London
Server: London Namesco - distance to server: 0.29km
The numbers are mbps
XXLF5: 2-3 bars
Wifi test
23; 8.82; 32.52
16; 14.17; 37.02
32; 14.50; 15.77
Network test
98; 6.57; 1.12
91; 7.24; 1.58
101; 6.98; 1.72
BVLE4: 2 bars
Wifi test
14; 15.25; 44.01
31; 21.15; 39.00
13; 36.08; 49.05
Network test
116; 4.43; 0.84
109; 4.96; 0.70
109; 4.79; 0.92
BWLE5: 2-3 bars
Wifi test
12; 16.97; 43.03
13; 19.41; 51.88
14; 27.40; 35.56
Network test
115; 6.42; 0.76
99; 7.52; 1.26
107; 8.98; 0.53
DDLE8: 2-3 bars
Wifi test
11; 23.83; 48.47
18; 16.07; 48.58
13; 21.32; 46.43
Network test
106; 4.17; 2.22
91; 5.01; 1.30
107; 4.38; 2.81
DDLE9: 2-3 bars
Wifi test
11; 18.73; 53.10
14; 29.88; 57.86
10; 27.57; 54.06
Network test
129; 8.24; 1.16
125; 8.71; 1.07
127; 8.19; 1.13
DULE6: 1-3 bars
Wifi test
8; 22.55; 53.16
14; 30.32; 50.89
13; 14.96; 40.76
Network test
176; 2.91; 1.05
113; 3.96; 1.96
129; 6.14; 1.47
DXLE8: 1-2 bars
Wifi test
9; 24.03; 54.31
17; 13.15; 49.33
28; 12.39; 55.82
Network test
98; 2.44; 1.15
90; 2.53; 0.77
90; 2.73; 1.70
DXLEA: 1-2 bars
Wifi test
19; 15.77; 47.46
18; 11.50; 55.70
13; 25.63; 56.94
Network test
101; 4.41; 1.11
117; 4.76; 1.00
96; 4.87; 1.18
NELE4: 2-3 bars
Wifi test
17; 41.56; 53.10
18; 37.38; 51.74
10; 28.92; 56.44
Network test
112; 4.73; 1.04
98; 4.59; 1.01
109; 4.17; 1.17
XXLE8: 2-3 bars
Wifi test
8; 25.79; 44.91
7; 28.41p; 59.54;
7; 19.19; 50.05
Network test
82; 3.50; 1.83
93; 3.21; 2.58
96; 3.60; 1.97
XXLEF: 1-2bars
Wifi test
9; 33.27; 52.68
9; 24.31; 53.95
17; 26.03; 63.81
Network test
98; 2.77; 1.78
98; 2.61; 0.97
102; 1.57; 1.00
XXLF2: 0-2 bars
Wifi test
12; 17.45; 57.90
14; 23.30; 53.49
9; 25.00; 51.61
Network test
95; 2.14; 0.62
106; 2.27; 1.75
100; 3.79; 1.04
This may not be helpful for many, but I thought I'll just share the tests anyway.
I forgot what modem the original vodafone S3 comes with; could anyone tell me which one it is?
The indicators are not true indicators of actual performance .
jje
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
JJEgan said:
The indicators are not true indicators of actual performance .
jje
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess...I just wanted to test which modem is good for me, and while doing so, I thought to share the test results.
I just found out that the stock Vodafone UK modem is BULF1.
I am going to try this now and see how it performs.
b0gd4n said:
I guess...I just wanted to test which modem is good for me, and while doing so, I thought to share the test results.
I just found out that the stock Vodafone UK modem is BULF1.
I am going to try this now and see how it performs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My tests showed BULF1 and 6 best on O2 UK .
jje
Hey guys I currently have a Nokia Lumia 810 Prototype but cannot perform the OTA update. Is there a way to manually update the OS? The specs are identical to my other 810.
Phone
Model: NOKIA RM-878_nam_usa_100
Time: Saturday, March 23, 2013 ● 3:53:56 PM
Time zone: UTC-08
Turned on since: Saturday, March 23, 2013 ● 10:40:08 AM
Operating time: 5 hours, 13 minutes and 47 seconds
Screen resolution: 480 × 800 (scaled)
Display language: English (United States)
Region format: English (United States)
OS version: 8.0.9903.0
.NET CLR version: 4.0.50829.0
Firmware version: 1532.2105.1241.1001
Hardware version: 1.0.0.0
Device ID:
Live ID:
Storage
Total memory: 898.39 MB
Available storage: 4.51 GB
Songs: 0
Number of pictures: 13
Pictures size: 5.19 MB
Music
# Time %
Songs: 0 00:00:00 100.0
Never played: 0 00:00:00 0.0
Rated: 0 00:00:00 0.0
Protected: 0 00:00:00 0.0
Total play count: 0 00:00:00
Genres # Time %
Hardware
Main camera: 8 MP (3,264 × 2,448)
Front camera: 1.2 MP (1,280 × 960)
Compass: Yes
Accelerometer: Yes
Gyroscope: Yes
GPS (Disabled on device)
Location: -
Accuracy (h | v): -
Altitude: -
Speed & course: -
Network
Cellular operator: T-Mobile
Cellular data roaming: No
Data enabled: Yes
Connection interface: WiFi
SSID: INDREMA
Bandwidth capacity: 286.1 Mbps
Ext. IP address:
Local IP address:
If your prototype device has the same hardware as the retail device, you can flash it with the retail firmware.
Of cause there's always a chance of a brick since you are using prototype hardware.
By the way, if your device is not experiencing any crashes/freezes, you are not missing much without Portico.