Related
what kind of frames/sec. are you guys getting in nenamark from the market. just curious
di11igaf said:
what kind of frames/sec. are you guys getting in nenamark from the market. just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
32.4 FPS (Need more text to post)
32.7 for me
shibby80 said:
32.7 for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heh. galaxy s i got 49.5
but honestly. all games run fine on nexus. why are we getting extra GPU if no software is using it is beyond me.
just to brag on the net ?
ll_l_x_l_ll said:
heh. galaxy s i got 49.5
but honestly. all games run fine on nexus. why are we getting extra GPU if no software is using it is beyond me.
just to brag on the net ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
joebobjoe said:
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude
i am not dissin the phone.
i think both phones have great positives and negatives.
all i am just saying that these scores dont mean anything. because there is no game that use this extra power on the galaxy S gpu.
so for whats worth. u can get a 100 fps on either devices. but if all the games have a nexus 1 dev standard. then whats the point?
Just got a 35.0
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
joebobjoe said:
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMAO that is a funny azz post right there.
I just got 36.0 with it overclocked to 1.4ghz
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
39.9 FPS, G2 is overclocked at 1.2 GHz.
nenamark score
52.1 on Samsung Galaxy S running android 2.1 and lagfix.
39.7 fps with 1.4ghz overclock.
47.5fps
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fyeGhS624g
EDIT : Now getting 55.2 FPS. Pics coming
Some bastard got a 55.6 FPS score from Nexus S oc'd:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16615951/nexuss1200nm.png
G2 CyanogenMod 6.1.1 Stable (1.8 GHz Overclock)
Test #1 49.2
Test #2 50.2
47.4 fps
Tmo G2 OC'd @ 1.5GHz (Performance) using baconbits 0.3
Tops out at 47.8 in Nenamark with a 1.5GHz OC.
Im wondering when Gingerbread comes out are we gonna see some performance gains? The Nexus S is getting ridiculous scores at 1.2GHZ.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=10282290#post10282290
htc vision oc at 1.5 android 2.3 gingervillian rom
nena result at 45fps
47.6 FPS
SetCPU on performance while OC'd to 1.5ghz
I'm interested to find out what quadrant scores people have been getting.
I finally managed to get 2.2 running and I'm consistently scoring around 1275.
Kris
1379 on 2.2 1.3
digthemlows said:
1379 on 2.2 1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's alright. I have 1.3 of Steve's build too, have you trimmed down running services?
Ive lost about 100 points since I flashed 2.2 1.3. I can barely break 1100 now.
hahaha beat 606 on 1.6
1323...getting up now
Unkkut said:
1323...getting up now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did you do to improve your score?
Wow! I just installed SetCPU, thinking that it might improve my score. With SetCPU installed and the min/max set to 998 I got 1061. I uninstalled SetCPU and and tried again. Got my best score yet - 1322.
Weird, I would have thought that SetCPU would improve performance.
Just got an 1880
Unkkut said:
Just got an 1880
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running what ROM? How on Earth did you pull that kind of score off? That's 500 more than anyone I've seen.
I just registered 1700 using set cpu at full overclock.
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
dj steves 2.2 v1.4 with the OC kernel.
I have a screenshot on gadgetu.net.
Just did another and got 1884
Stock 1.6...got 683...no idea why.
rukcus said:
hahaha beat 606 on 1.6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yea, expect very low quadrant score with 1.6.
1542 on dj steves 1.1.1
894 on official 2.2
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
1902!! Man, im still rising.
thanks to the stock 2.2 lag fix from smokku, scores went from mid 800's to top of the charts at 1411, setcpu at 1100mhz
cool!
How are you guys getting these scores? I have a stock Froyo 2.2 Streak (offical update) and I'm lucky to get 800 :-(
new personal best 1603
thanks to smokku tweak
I was getting around 1000-1100 on Steve's 1.3... I just installed his 1.4.5 and overclocked as high as it would go. I didn't close any programs, had wi-fi on, just as I'd normally be using my phone. It ran a 1639. Not bad!
I noticed the animations ran a lot faster. Heck, that score is tripled what I was running on 2.1.
What rom has the highest quad score for the vibrant?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Depends on many factors, not just the rom. There's also the Kernel, OCing, UVing and even the launcher.
Highest I have had without an overclock was 2456, and that was on Simply Galaxy v3 RC3 (Port from i9000) with all the tweaks engaged. It was very very fast. Faster than any other ROM I have used, even with overclock. Hell, if I could OC with that ROM I would bet that I could break 3000+ quads easy. But quads are worthless. You just have to try using the phone with the speed of that ROM. I didn't know the vibrant could be that fast.
Running Trigger right now. Get anywhere from 1400-1600. Runs ok. Was just wondering what some of the other Rome were capable of. How is the Simply Galaxy rom? I personally don't know anyone who has used it.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
2750 Quadrant.
Darky 9.5 Froyo 2.2.1 base rom, 1.48Ghz Bullet Kernel linked in my sig.
Phone is FLYIN. Gingerbread 2.3.3 builds can go higher (but have bugs).
I got a Quadrant of 3300.....!!
I was using my TI-83 calculator with a tic-tac stuck in the DC in slot!
2000 flat w/ bi winning V2 no OC w/ voodoo. VERY FAST though. Quadrant doesn't give it justice.
}{Alienz}{ said:
2750 Quadrant.
Darky 9.5 Froyo 2.2.1 base rom, 1.48Ghz Bullet Kernel linked in my sig.
Phone is FLYIN. Gingerbread 2.3.3 builds can go higher (but have bugs).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get the same on darkys rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Quads dont mean anything.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
I have a 3500 quadrant. On top of that, my battery increases 2% every hour as a result.
I'm running Android 3.3 on mine. 4700 quadrant score and when I plug my usb up to my laptop the phone charges it.
5000 with a V8 hemi under the hood!
With the battery in, I get around 16K but I only get 8K if I take the battery out.
I'm using the FBS ROM.
Speaking of Quadrant...It sucks
cashyftw said:
Speaking of Quadrant...It sucks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second this.
So useless of an app, it has nothing to do with the actually smoothness and snapyness in any phone. Sometimes I feel it's scores are the other way around, the lowest you get the better your phone is
I'm a total lurker, but after "bricking" my vibrant about 3 weeks after getting it home last Fall and discovering the fix here, I've been tweaking, wiping, flashing, odining, and having a helluva lot of fun with it. I'll probably betray myself as still being a noob, but I see everyone kind of poo-pooing Quadrant as meaningless (and other benchmarks, it seems). Is there any objective measurement that you guys consider worthwhile?
I thought I was all hot **** for breaking the 2K mark, but I guess none of that matters?
Trigger 3.2 with Bullet 1.42...just added bullet, so currently OC'd to 1.2 while I get a feel for what the phone can handle.
anthonys2r said:
I have a 3500 quadrant. On top of that, my battery increases 2% every hour as a result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you currently on and what kernel are you using?
test4vibrant said:
What are you currently on and what kernel are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He was obviously being sarcastic. Can't believe someone fell for the increasing battery **** LOL.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
On Biwinning with o.c. I am getting 2580 ....... but it does not perform ant better than leaving the clock @ 1000 so I leave unclocked ......... I get great battery life then...........
Quadrant is amusing...
but it's not always telling of how a rom actually performs. Back in the day when we were using the OCLF, quad scrores were in the 2k range and that was with 2.1
That being said, I felt compelled to post this anyway, mainly just to show the cpu score improvement that we get with gingerbread. My phone was running Cyanogenmod7 at stock speeds. Comparing quadrant scores between roms that are all based off of each other is pointless.
The 1815 score is from CM7
The 1755 score is from MIUI
MIUI performs great, but it's not as buttery smooth as CM7. But from the two scores you wouldn't see that. More importantly I think this also lends to what I said about comparing two scores between roms that are based off of each other.
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
This is kp's rom.
UPDATE: Now im getting around 4200 on cm7 prebeta 2 with the built in oc and it feels alot smoother!
No! My highest was 303x!
My highest is always ~2900
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
4700, and only running one core!
TechnoNeto said:
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
How is it you were getting 4000 or 4700 on quadrant standard?
BravoMotorola said:
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is in beta so we could still see much improvement also you were getting that on quadrant or antutu?
mramirezusa said:
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as me is it saying that you are oc to 1.2 as mine does?
J-man67 said:
No! My highest was 303x!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you have set cpu to 1.1 min and max
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You felt the need to express this why? This wasn't in the Q&A section as do benchmarks mean anything. It's a post about your scores not about people trying to prove their tech hierarchy.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
I got a 3600 "in-use" benchmark, with max and min set to 1.1. With max at 1.1 and min still at .2, I still got 3200, which is not bad.
You seriously got 4000+ while on the phone's original stock system and everything??
Mine feels so much faster and snappier now on GB with the faux kernel and everything..
Tao_Man said:
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true and in response to first post i get around 3330+ with most of my apps going but i have both min and max set to highest in set cpu
As does mine feel faster on gingerbread
Tao_Man said:
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the way I test also. I'm around 3000 with all the normal apps running that I leave running and min and max CPU speeds kept where I use them. It feels very smooth!
I have an atrix benchmark thread!
\/
i can't seem to pass 2800 running stock
Now that the Evo is rooted again lets see who can throw up the fastest benchmark numbers. Here's the rules.
1) Must have a screen shot of bench mark results
2) Include your rom and kernal
Let the games begin!
My evo is 9 inches long.
Benchmark scores are much like comparing penis sizes - if you do it on a forum, everyone is going to use someone else's photo or photoshop their own. Or just spout off some random large number, like the nine inches guy.
But, in contrast to penis sizes, benchmark scores don't matter. I personally have no clue what my scores would be, but my phone runs perfectly smooth so I'm not going to waste my time trying to make it faster just for bragging rights.
But I don't have a penis, so maybe I just don't get it.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
plainjane said:
But, in contrast to penis sizes, benchmark scores don't matter.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with everything you said, so youre saying size DOES matter?
I'm on my computer so no screenshot right now, but I consistently get 1000-1100 Quadrants with the following combination:
Synergy RLS1 non-GM
More Freedom 0.8.5 Universal
245-768 MHz, interactiveX, noop
You do know that quadrant scores can be changed by the user?
Art2Fly said:
I agree with everything you said, so youre saying size DOES matter?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We (and I'm speaking for most females here) will tell you otherwise, but size does matter to an extent. There's a little wiggle room, but yeah it makes a difference.
Girth is just as important, if not more important than length, and freakishly large penises are personally not much fun. But don't worry, it doesn't have to be as big as you think. I haven't slept with very many guys, but I have found that most of them thought that theirs was too small. Only one's was.
But no, benchmark scores don't matter. Not at all.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Yeah I can understand the girth part, I guess it's like being a musician, you never feel like youre good enough, even though god blesses you with.. talent.. anywho, i think its time to get it on.
I get 1300 with Miui.
We're talking about penis sizes? Hahahaha <3xda
Deck's + SZ + SuperCharger script + ViperMod script.
nice thats good
My quadrant score is 4.
Mflops is -12
Penis length is 7.1644" @ 75°F
Is that good?
Evo Deck 1.3b2, Tiamat 3.3.7, -75mV undervolt, 245/883mhz, smartass gov.
Running "[KingsROM][Alliance RLS-3] [ODEXED] [NETFLIX]SENSE 2.1+ 3.0 HybriD 3D " The BREED ", stock kernal. Might overclock, but I'm not THAT knowledgable on modding just yet.
LOL - Good to know size doesn't matter My Evo is hung like a hamster, but it's hell at 100 MPH. I try not to make him feel to bad by taking about his benchmarks and short comings. Fortunately for MY Evo he can fake how big he is in certain applications so it makes him feel better.
so.. whats the point of "size matters" if when I flashed Synergy+GM the score was way longer than regular synergy but way slower... makes no sense
Did I win?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
I'm a tripod.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Using cm7 savagezen kernal 245 min 1113 Max on demand. With v6 supercharger. I've gotten all the way into 1600s on past but I'm to lazy to reset phone and get it up to its Max tonight
I don't have screenshots, but I was running Synergy RLS1 + Godmode and I had a quadrant score of about 2000, but it didn't mean much considering how badly everything else performed.
I remember on stock OTA it was about 500. I'm on Synergy RLS1, and now I get about 1000.
did I win?
sent from a 3d fone
xrom odex
nertchy 1.0 kernel
1.72
notown775 said:
did I win?
sent from a 3d fone
xrom odex
nertchy 1.0 kernel
1.72
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...Something's not right here... >_>