I'm interested to find out what quadrant scores people have been getting.
I finally managed to get 2.2 running and I'm consistently scoring around 1275.
Kris
1379 on 2.2 1.3
digthemlows said:
1379 on 2.2 1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's alright. I have 1.3 of Steve's build too, have you trimmed down running services?
Ive lost about 100 points since I flashed 2.2 1.3. I can barely break 1100 now.
hahaha beat 606 on 1.6
1323...getting up now
Unkkut said:
1323...getting up now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did you do to improve your score?
Wow! I just installed SetCPU, thinking that it might improve my score. With SetCPU installed and the min/max set to 998 I got 1061. I uninstalled SetCPU and and tried again. Got my best score yet - 1322.
Weird, I would have thought that SetCPU would improve performance.
Just got an 1880
Unkkut said:
Just got an 1880
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running what ROM? How on Earth did you pull that kind of score off? That's 500 more than anyone I've seen.
I just registered 1700 using set cpu at full overclock.
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
dj steves 2.2 v1.4 with the OC kernel.
I have a screenshot on gadgetu.net.
Just did another and got 1884
Stock 1.6...got 683...no idea why.
rukcus said:
hahaha beat 606 on 1.6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yea, expect very low quadrant score with 1.6.
1542 on dj steves 1.1.1
894 on official 2.2
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
1902!! Man, im still rising.
thanks to the stock 2.2 lag fix from smokku, scores went from mid 800's to top of the charts at 1411, setcpu at 1100mhz
cool!
How are you guys getting these scores? I have a stock Froyo 2.2 Streak (offical update) and I'm lucky to get 800 :-(
new personal best 1603
thanks to smokku tweak
I was getting around 1000-1100 on Steve's 1.3... I just installed his 1.4.5 and overclocked as high as it would go. I didn't close any programs, had wi-fi on, just as I'd normally be using my phone. It ran a 1639. Not bad!
I noticed the animations ran a lot faster. Heck, that score is tripled what I was running on 2.1.
Related
I was curious if one of the senior members could explain how people are able to achieve some of these crazy mflop and mhz when you go to the linpack site. I understand that the droid has a beefier processor so I get the 1300 mhz numbers - I just dont understand how you could hit 80 mflops.
Are these stable everyday devices or are they maxed out to hit the number and then dialed back for normal use.
Thanks.
The Linpack results are manipulable. If you know what you are doing you can get it to say pretty much what ever you'd like it to say.
I have no clue either, but I saw framework hit 8 mflops with evil Eris 3 Rom
korben dallas said:
I have no clue either, but I saw framework hit 8 mflops with evil Eris 3 Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.
pjsockett said:
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I did see it regardless if it was fake.
Thats cool - Thanks guys - seemed kind of unrealistic.
I and running XTR and hit about 2.6 - 3.1 @ 710mhz.
Anytime I exceed 710 I get boot looped.
pjsockett said:
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I can confirm, I hit this number with Tainted Vanilla 1.4, JIT, overclock to 806mhz, and Airplane Mode enabled.
LexusBrian400 said:
Yeah I can confirm, I hit this number with Tainted Vanilla 1.4, JIT, overclock to 806mhz, and Airplane Mode enabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seriously?
the highest i hit was 5.43 or something and that was white widow 3.2 767 overclocked and nothing running in the background... i should try airplane mode.
I faked them, linpack is worthless.
I put froyo on my wife's droid and it gets 9.8 consistently without messing with her everyday settings. It only has a 800mhz kernel too.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
zwade01 said:
I put froyo on my wife's droid and it gets 9.8 consistently without messing with her everyday settings. It only has a 800mhz kernel too.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and that is NOT Unbelievable. (Thats not sarcasm BTW)
Froyo is like:
Giving your phone extacy...
Its fasstttt
What is a good mflop score? running buufed 2.0b oc to 768 mhz i get 5.05 mflops
That is a very good mflop score. I have never heard of anyone getting at or higher than 6.
In my experience;
Stock Hero (2.1) - 1.9-2.2 mflops
Aloysius OC'd to 710 - 3-3.2
Aloysius OC'd to 768, JIT enabled - 4.5-5.2
DarchDroid 2.7 OC'd to 710, JIT enabled - 4.5-4.8
Of course, YMMV depending on memory, apps running, etc
A_Guy71 said:
That is a very good mflop score. I have never heard of anyone getting at or higher than 6.
In my experience;
Stock Hero (2.1) - 1.9-2.2 mflops
Aloysius OC'd to 710 - 3-3.2
Aloysius OC'd to 768, JIT enabled - 4.5-5.2
DarchDroid 2.7 OC'd to 710, JIT enabled - 4.5-4.8
Of course, YMMV depending on memory, apps running, etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ohhh okay, what does a good mflop score mean, as in like, because my mflops are higher, my phone will run faster?
eagles16 said:
ohhh okay, what does a good mflop score mean, as in like, because my mflops are higher, my phone will run faster?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More or less.
You can look at the linpack scores on there website. The gsm hero and cdma share top 10 scores. I think me and someone else have top scores of 5.4 and 5.5mflops.
Sent from my Hero CDMA using the XDA mobile application powered by Tapatalk
the highest i ever got was on ic3rom with jit enabled: 5.22 mflops.
hey jus10o, did we ever find out if everyone's phones were freezing because of the typo (768 vs 787)? i saw it on darch's thread but never saw an answer
jeremysterling said:
the highest i ever got was on ic3rom with jit enabled: 5.22 mflops.
hey jus10o, did we ever find out if everyone's phones were freezing because of the typo (768 vs 787)? i saw it on darch's thread but never saw an answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it shouldnt of froze your phone.. But in 2.5 or 2.6 when darch said it was clockable to 787mhz, it wouldnt ever go higher then 768, even when manual set in OC app.
But yes thats why it wasnt working.. 99% sure. Ill try to catch toast while he is on and ask him bout it.
Maybe it's just me but doesn't less than 6 sound kind of low? Even for June 2010? I had/still have a Milestone, rooted, ROM'd and O/C'd and it runs at 1200mhz and MFLOPS are always in the high 10's.
R1PP3R said:
it runs at 1200mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock CPU speed for the Hero is 528mHz. Less than half of what you referenced.
Just wanted to know the highest score anyones ever got. Im using myns rls5 underclocked to 806 with nets kernel. Im getting a score of 908 lmao, wtf?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Well the fact that the new version reads lower plus the fact that your underclocked that much, I'm surprised it was that high, unless you're still on 1.5.
The highest scores are from CM6 w/ the Snap Turbo Kernel and range from 2500 to ~3000. Highest I ever got was 2700. Miui also gets high scores of like 1700 to 2000ish for some people, although I usually go 1500s. For Sense ROMs, I think the highest I've gotten was 1500s or maybe low 16s with the old Quadrant and MikFroyo + Ziggy's BFS kernel.
I also used to get 1400s with EViO 2 1.7 underclocked to 921. That is a sweet ROM.
Its been a few month's since i ran one, but I think it was a little over 1200
Benchmarks
CM7 Nightly #11, Kernel 2.6.37.1
Quadrant / Linpack / Neocore
9000 my phones a BEAST !
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
CheesyNutz said:
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, if you're phone feels snappy thats all that matters.
CheesyNutz said:
9000 my phones a BEAST !
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG 9000? Is that a phone or pc bro? lmao
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
I get 600 at 384mhz. beat that
What rom has the highest quad score for the vibrant?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Depends on many factors, not just the rom. There's also the Kernel, OCing, UVing and even the launcher.
Highest I have had without an overclock was 2456, and that was on Simply Galaxy v3 RC3 (Port from i9000) with all the tweaks engaged. It was very very fast. Faster than any other ROM I have used, even with overclock. Hell, if I could OC with that ROM I would bet that I could break 3000+ quads easy. But quads are worthless. You just have to try using the phone with the speed of that ROM. I didn't know the vibrant could be that fast.
Running Trigger right now. Get anywhere from 1400-1600. Runs ok. Was just wondering what some of the other Rome were capable of. How is the Simply Galaxy rom? I personally don't know anyone who has used it.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
2750 Quadrant.
Darky 9.5 Froyo 2.2.1 base rom, 1.48Ghz Bullet Kernel linked in my sig.
Phone is FLYIN. Gingerbread 2.3.3 builds can go higher (but have bugs).
I got a Quadrant of 3300.....!!
I was using my TI-83 calculator with a tic-tac stuck in the DC in slot!
2000 flat w/ bi winning V2 no OC w/ voodoo. VERY FAST though. Quadrant doesn't give it justice.
}{Alienz}{ said:
2750 Quadrant.
Darky 9.5 Froyo 2.2.1 base rom, 1.48Ghz Bullet Kernel linked in my sig.
Phone is FLYIN. Gingerbread 2.3.3 builds can go higher (but have bugs).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get the same on darkys rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Quads dont mean anything.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
I have a 3500 quadrant. On top of that, my battery increases 2% every hour as a result.
I'm running Android 3.3 on mine. 4700 quadrant score and when I plug my usb up to my laptop the phone charges it.
5000 with a V8 hemi under the hood!
With the battery in, I get around 16K but I only get 8K if I take the battery out.
I'm using the FBS ROM.
Speaking of Quadrant...It sucks
cashyftw said:
Speaking of Quadrant...It sucks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second this.
So useless of an app, it has nothing to do with the actually smoothness and snapyness in any phone. Sometimes I feel it's scores are the other way around, the lowest you get the better your phone is
I'm a total lurker, but after "bricking" my vibrant about 3 weeks after getting it home last Fall and discovering the fix here, I've been tweaking, wiping, flashing, odining, and having a helluva lot of fun with it. I'll probably betray myself as still being a noob, but I see everyone kind of poo-pooing Quadrant as meaningless (and other benchmarks, it seems). Is there any objective measurement that you guys consider worthwhile?
I thought I was all hot **** for breaking the 2K mark, but I guess none of that matters?
Trigger 3.2 with Bullet 1.42...just added bullet, so currently OC'd to 1.2 while I get a feel for what the phone can handle.
anthonys2r said:
I have a 3500 quadrant. On top of that, my battery increases 2% every hour as a result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you currently on and what kernel are you using?
test4vibrant said:
What are you currently on and what kernel are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He was obviously being sarcastic. Can't believe someone fell for the increasing battery **** LOL.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
On Biwinning with o.c. I am getting 2580 ....... but it does not perform ant better than leaving the clock @ 1000 so I leave unclocked ......... I get great battery life then...........
Quadrant is amusing...
but it's not always telling of how a rom actually performs. Back in the day when we were using the OCLF, quad scrores were in the 2k range and that was with 2.1
That being said, I felt compelled to post this anyway, mainly just to show the cpu score improvement that we get with gingerbread. My phone was running Cyanogenmod7 at stock speeds. Comparing quadrant scores between roms that are all based off of each other is pointless.
The 1815 score is from CM7
The 1755 score is from MIUI
MIUI performs great, but it's not as buttery smooth as CM7. But from the two scores you wouldn't see that. More importantly I think this also lends to what I said about comparing two scores between roms that are based off of each other.
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
This is kp's rom.
UPDATE: Now im getting around 4200 on cm7 prebeta 2 with the built in oc and it feels alot smoother!
No! My highest was 303x!
My highest is always ~2900
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
4700, and only running one core!
TechnoNeto said:
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
How is it you were getting 4000 or 4700 on quadrant standard?
BravoMotorola said:
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is in beta so we could still see much improvement also you were getting that on quadrant or antutu?
mramirezusa said:
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as me is it saying that you are oc to 1.2 as mine does?
J-man67 said:
No! My highest was 303x!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you have set cpu to 1.1 min and max
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You felt the need to express this why? This wasn't in the Q&A section as do benchmarks mean anything. It's a post about your scores not about people trying to prove their tech hierarchy.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
I got a 3600 "in-use" benchmark, with max and min set to 1.1. With max at 1.1 and min still at .2, I still got 3200, which is not bad.
You seriously got 4000+ while on the phone's original stock system and everything??
Mine feels so much faster and snappier now on GB with the faux kernel and everything..
Tao_Man said:
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true and in response to first post i get around 3330+ with most of my apps going but i have both min and max set to highest in set cpu
As does mine feel faster on gingerbread
Tao_Man said:
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the way I test also. I'm around 3000 with all the normal apps running that I leave running and min and max CPU speeds kept where I use them. It feels very smooth!
I have an atrix benchmark thread!
\/
i can't seem to pass 2800 running stock