Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
This is kp's rom.
UPDATE: Now im getting around 4200 on cm7 prebeta 2 with the built in oc and it feels alot smoother!
No! My highest was 303x!
My highest is always ~2900
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
4700, and only running one core!
TechnoNeto said:
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
How is it you were getting 4000 or 4700 on quadrant standard?
BravoMotorola said:
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is in beta so we could still see much improvement also you were getting that on quadrant or antutu?
mramirezusa said:
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as me is it saying that you are oc to 1.2 as mine does?
J-man67 said:
No! My highest was 303x!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you have set cpu to 1.1 min and max
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You felt the need to express this why? This wasn't in the Q&A section as do benchmarks mean anything. It's a post about your scores not about people trying to prove their tech hierarchy.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
I got a 3600 "in-use" benchmark, with max and min set to 1.1. With max at 1.1 and min still at .2, I still got 3200, which is not bad.
You seriously got 4000+ while on the phone's original stock system and everything??
Mine feels so much faster and snappier now on GB with the faux kernel and everything..
Tao_Man said:
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true and in response to first post i get around 3330+ with most of my apps going but i have both min and max set to highest in set cpu
As does mine feel faster on gingerbread
Tao_Man said:
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the way I test also. I'm around 3000 with all the normal apps running that I leave running and min and max CPU speeds kept where I use them. It feels very smooth!
I have an atrix benchmark thread!
\/
i can't seem to pass 2800 running stock
Related
I was curious if one of the senior members could explain how people are able to achieve some of these crazy mflop and mhz when you go to the linpack site. I understand that the droid has a beefier processor so I get the 1300 mhz numbers - I just dont understand how you could hit 80 mflops.
Are these stable everyday devices or are they maxed out to hit the number and then dialed back for normal use.
Thanks.
The Linpack results are manipulable. If you know what you are doing you can get it to say pretty much what ever you'd like it to say.
I have no clue either, but I saw framework hit 8 mflops with evil Eris 3 Rom
korben dallas said:
I have no clue either, but I saw framework hit 8 mflops with evil Eris 3 Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.
pjsockett said:
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I did see it regardless if it was fake.
Thats cool - Thanks guys - seemed kind of unrealistic.
I and running XTR and hit about 2.6 - 3.1 @ 710mhz.
Anytime I exceed 710 I get boot looped.
pjsockett said:
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I can confirm, I hit this number with Tainted Vanilla 1.4, JIT, overclock to 806mhz, and Airplane Mode enabled.
LexusBrian400 said:
Yeah I can confirm, I hit this number with Tainted Vanilla 1.4, JIT, overclock to 806mhz, and Airplane Mode enabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seriously?
the highest i hit was 5.43 or something and that was white widow 3.2 767 overclocked and nothing running in the background... i should try airplane mode.
I faked them, linpack is worthless.
I put froyo on my wife's droid and it gets 9.8 consistently without messing with her everyday settings. It only has a 800mhz kernel too.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
zwade01 said:
I put froyo on my wife's droid and it gets 9.8 consistently without messing with her everyday settings. It only has a 800mhz kernel too.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and that is NOT Unbelievable. (Thats not sarcasm BTW)
Froyo is like:
Giving your phone extacy...
Its fasstttt
what kind of frames/sec. are you guys getting in nenamark from the market. just curious
di11igaf said:
what kind of frames/sec. are you guys getting in nenamark from the market. just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
32.4 FPS (Need more text to post)
32.7 for me
shibby80 said:
32.7 for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heh. galaxy s i got 49.5
but honestly. all games run fine on nexus. why are we getting extra GPU if no software is using it is beyond me.
just to brag on the net ?
ll_l_x_l_ll said:
heh. galaxy s i got 49.5
but honestly. all games run fine on nexus. why are we getting extra GPU if no software is using it is beyond me.
just to brag on the net ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
joebobjoe said:
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude
i am not dissin the phone.
i think both phones have great positives and negatives.
all i am just saying that these scores dont mean anything. because there is no game that use this extra power on the galaxy S gpu.
so for whats worth. u can get a 100 fps on either devices. but if all the games have a nexus 1 dev standard. then whats the point?
Just got a 35.0
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
joebobjoe said:
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMAO that is a funny azz post right there.
I just got 36.0 with it overclocked to 1.4ghz
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
39.9 FPS, G2 is overclocked at 1.2 GHz.
nenamark score
52.1 on Samsung Galaxy S running android 2.1 and lagfix.
39.7 fps with 1.4ghz overclock.
47.5fps
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fyeGhS624g
EDIT : Now getting 55.2 FPS. Pics coming
Some bastard got a 55.6 FPS score from Nexus S oc'd:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16615951/nexuss1200nm.png
G2 CyanogenMod 6.1.1 Stable (1.8 GHz Overclock)
Test #1 49.2
Test #2 50.2
47.4 fps
Tmo G2 OC'd @ 1.5GHz (Performance) using baconbits 0.3
Tops out at 47.8 in Nenamark with a 1.5GHz OC.
Im wondering when Gingerbread comes out are we gonna see some performance gains? The Nexus S is getting ridiculous scores at 1.2GHZ.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=10282290#post10282290
htc vision oc at 1.5 android 2.3 gingervillian rom
nena result at 45fps
47.6 FPS
SetCPU on performance while OC'd to 1.5ghz
I'm interested to find out what quadrant scores people have been getting.
I finally managed to get 2.2 running and I'm consistently scoring around 1275.
Kris
1379 on 2.2 1.3
digthemlows said:
1379 on 2.2 1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's alright. I have 1.3 of Steve's build too, have you trimmed down running services?
Ive lost about 100 points since I flashed 2.2 1.3. I can barely break 1100 now.
hahaha beat 606 on 1.6
1323...getting up now
Unkkut said:
1323...getting up now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did you do to improve your score?
Wow! I just installed SetCPU, thinking that it might improve my score. With SetCPU installed and the min/max set to 998 I got 1061. I uninstalled SetCPU and and tried again. Got my best score yet - 1322.
Weird, I would have thought that SetCPU would improve performance.
Just got an 1880
Unkkut said:
Just got an 1880
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running what ROM? How on Earth did you pull that kind of score off? That's 500 more than anyone I've seen.
I just registered 1700 using set cpu at full overclock.
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
dj steves 2.2 v1.4 with the OC kernel.
I have a screenshot on gadgetu.net.
Just did another and got 1884
Stock 1.6...got 683...no idea why.
rukcus said:
hahaha beat 606 on 1.6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yea, expect very low quadrant score with 1.6.
1542 on dj steves 1.1.1
894 on official 2.2
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
1902!! Man, im still rising.
thanks to the stock 2.2 lag fix from smokku, scores went from mid 800's to top of the charts at 1411, setcpu at 1100mhz
cool!
How are you guys getting these scores? I have a stock Froyo 2.2 Streak (offical update) and I'm lucky to get 800 :-(
new personal best 1603
thanks to smokku tweak
I was getting around 1000-1100 on Steve's 1.3... I just installed his 1.4.5 and overclocked as high as it would go. I didn't close any programs, had wi-fi on, just as I'd normally be using my phone. It ran a 1639. Not bad!
I noticed the animations ran a lot faster. Heck, that score is tripled what I was running on 2.1.
Just wanted to know the highest score anyones ever got. Im using myns rls5 underclocked to 806 with nets kernel. Im getting a score of 908 lmao, wtf?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Well the fact that the new version reads lower plus the fact that your underclocked that much, I'm surprised it was that high, unless you're still on 1.5.
The highest scores are from CM6 w/ the Snap Turbo Kernel and range from 2500 to ~3000. Highest I ever got was 2700. Miui also gets high scores of like 1700 to 2000ish for some people, although I usually go 1500s. For Sense ROMs, I think the highest I've gotten was 1500s or maybe low 16s with the old Quadrant and MikFroyo + Ziggy's BFS kernel.
I also used to get 1400s with EViO 2 1.7 underclocked to 921. That is a sweet ROM.
Its been a few month's since i ran one, but I think it was a little over 1200
Benchmarks
CM7 Nightly #11, Kernel 2.6.37.1
Quadrant / Linpack / Neocore
9000 my phones a BEAST !
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
CheesyNutz said:
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, if you're phone feels snappy thats all that matters.
CheesyNutz said:
9000 my phones a BEAST !
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG 9000? Is that a phone or pc bro? lmao
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
I get 600 at 384mhz. beat that
Finally we have a fair test for the dual cores. Just been running it and i have the top 5 scores!!
Is that 1608mhz , your phone must be on fire
Now have 150.595. It was a bit warm. I expect it to fall as the number one soon, i m sure there are guys on here with over 1.7ghz. I cant seem to get that to stay stable.
Finally! My highest (1.2) was 122 although that was an inconsistent result. My average high is around 100. Wonder what the Sensation and Tegra devices are hitting.....
Regards.
Best i can do so far.
I'm getting wildly inconsistent results. Managed to get 120 at 1200mhz with a accuracy of 2.2 after a dozen runs.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Yeah you just have to keep trying until you get a high score with a valid accuracy. It wont let you save unless its consistently accurate.
MaBlo said:
I'm getting wildly inconsistent results. Managed to get 120 at 1200mhz with a accuracy of 2.2 after a dozen runs.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you set both minimum speed and maximum speed to 1200?
152 is my new high, thats it for a while, battery flat, phone rather warm!
140 is my best stable score, running @1.425ghz using Tegrak
rovex said:
152 is my new high, thats it for a while, battery flat, phone rather warm!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the top 10 has only your results in it, lol
Its the Moto Zooms i worry about., Although the Tegra is slower the Zoom seems to be able to hit up to 2GHz. We need a 1.8Ghz SGS2 to keep them down..
I do wonder if the Atom powered tabs will beat us though.
ph00ny said:
did you set both minimum speed and maximum speed to 1200?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I did.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
I got 155.597 MFLOPS with my Galaxy S II overcloked to 1.56 GHz at 1.375v on Core voltage.
The rest is default.
I can probably break 160 MFLOPS if i take the CPU speed up to 1.65 GHz if i can get it to run stable there.
rovex said:
Its the Moto Zooms i worry about., Although the Tegra is slower the Zoom seems to be able to hit up to 2GHz. We need a 1.8Ghz SGS2 to keep them down..
I do wonder if the Atom powered tabs will beat us though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Pagnell said:
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, my thoughts exactly reading this entire thread...
Pagnell said:
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's not even talking about a phone, if I understood what he meant, he's talking about the Xoom tablet.
[Sarcasm] Yes im going to have sleepless nights for weeks about it..[/sarcasm]
I would have thought the context (competitive spirit) was obvious..
Anyway it seem the Sensation bunch have found the Linpack cheat. 200 on a 1.2ghz non overclocked Sensation.. Nah...
Ok, now i managed to get 170.027 MFLOPS in Linpack with the CPU at 1.58 GHz and the Core voltage on 1.375v .
So far the phone are 100% stable at this clock.
Tom-Helge said:
Ok, now i managed to get 170.027 MFLOPS in Linpack with the CPU at 1.58 GHz and the Core voltage on 1.375v .
[image]
So far the phone are 100% stable at this clock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precision: Inconsistent Result