Database Users

quadrant benchmark scores 5 runs atrix stock

2544
2744
2733
2528
2719
are these good scores

Those are ridiculous. The highest I've ever gotten on my rooted dinc is in the 1600s, and that's running at 1.22 ghz
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

Pretty good.
Though, my dell streak overclocked to 1.22ghz would do 2100 quadrant scores

Lol
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

I keep gettin around 2500 and up.. Im lovin this..

Thats funny cause my friend is right here with his quadtant 4 runs 1768 was its best stock my nexus s stock was 1678 and at 1. 4 ghz I'm at 2368
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

nucentury08 said:
Thats funny cause my friend is right here with his quadtant 4 runs 1768 was its best stock my nexus s stock was 1678 and at 1. 4 ghz I'm at 2368
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just got 2813 so... -Fly like a G6-.

Hmm you guys nose must be out the door #Smh
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

I just ran it and got 2481. Only thing I've done is root the phone.

Why am i not surprised that nucentury, who seems to have NO interest in getting the Atrix since it doesn't have a Gyroscope which will apparently be such an improvement for gaming that Crysis might actually run on a phone if it had one, is bragging about random crap again. Or maybe he's not bragging, seeing as my Archos 70 Internet Tablet with a 250GB hard drive running Froyo already got a score of 1,778 in Quadrant running at 1Ghz. Or maybe it's the idea that benchmarks are completely meaningless for the most part.
And if you have to overclock your device and still can't reach the scores of the Atrix.... which as far as i'm aware i don't believe Quadrant has support for multi-core chips yet.... then i don't see what you're bragging about, really.

nucentury08 said:
Thats funny cause my friend is right here with his quadtant 4 runs 1768 was its best stock my nexus s stock was 1678 and at 1. 4 ghz I'm at 2368
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why are you here again? go back to the galaxy S forum so you can all stroke each other's clearly better egos.
oh, and 2544, nothing done but root.

nucentury08 said:
Thats funny cause my friend is right here with his quadtant 4 runs 1768 was its best stock my nexus s stock was 1678 and at 1. 4 ghz I'm at 2368
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro you have been trolling legit every Atrix topic. Stop.

Quadrant Speeds
I have a Samsung Captivate. Just went through warranty exchange as I got one right after release and had been battling shutdown issues. After rooting and applying lag fix I now get between 2000 - 2200. I just ran it and got 2248, which is on the high end of what i usually get.
I wish I would have waited on the Atrix. Have fun with your new hardware dudes.

completely stock lowest was 2487 highest 2691

I personally think the more important question is......does the phone run smoothly?

sturgeon123456 said:
I personally think the more important question is......does the phone run smoothly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine surely does so far. I've run Quadrant a few times and got just under 2800. Hell, I got 2300 while playing music in the background.

sturgeon123456 said:
I personally think the more important question is......does the phone run smoothly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it does. With my old Captivate, when I went to add a shortcut to my homescreen, when I hit the applications button it would take like 10 seconds to load up the next screen with my apps list. And I had mine overclocked to 1.28ghz and all that jazz. This one opens it straight away. No waiting for anything to load.

What are the neocore benchmarks at? That's a pretty cool program to test the phones gaming ability. I'm not getting an atrix because I like my iPhone but I used to use android phones. Just curious about the phones performance.

ApplCobbler said:
Yes, it does. With my old Captivate, when I went to add a shortcut to my homescreen, when I hit the applications button it would take like 10 seconds to load up the next screen with my apps list. And I had mine overclocked to 1.28ghz and all that jazz. This one opens it straight away. No waiting for anything to load.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I am using a galaxy s captivate and I like it, I cant wait till I can get my paws on the atrix!

leadguy68 said:
Pretty good.
Though, my dell streak overclocked to 1.22ghz would do 2100 quadrant scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apples and oranges...
The Streak is 800x480, as are most high-end large sceen Android phones, and the Atrix is pushing 35% more pixels @ 960x540, and STILL getting higher scores...
Plus, add in what others have mentioned that Quadrant is not multi-core capable, and you start to realize how much power is under the hood of this thing!

Quadrant Benchmark results.

Just wanted to know the highest score anyones ever got. Im using myns rls5 underclocked to 806 with nets kernel. Im getting a score of 908 lmao, wtf?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

Well the fact that the new version reads lower plus the fact that your underclocked that much, I'm surprised it was that high, unless you're still on 1.5.
The highest scores are from CM6 w/ the Snap Turbo Kernel and range from 2500 to ~3000. Highest I ever got was 2700. Miui also gets high scores of like 1700 to 2000ish for some people, although I usually go 1500s. For Sense ROMs, I think the highest I've gotten was 1500s or maybe low 16s with the old Quadrant and MikFroyo + Ziggy's BFS kernel.
I also used to get 1400s with EViO 2 1.7 underclocked to 921. That is a sweet ROM.

Its been a few month's since i ran one, but I think it was a little over 1200

Benchmarks
CM7 Nightly #11, Kernel 2.6.37.1
Quadrant / Linpack / Neocore

9000 my phones a BEAST !
funny part is all the numbers mean squat

CheesyNutz said:
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, if you're phone feels snappy thats all that matters.

CheesyNutz said:
9000 my phones a BEAST !
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG 9000? Is that a phone or pc bro? lmao
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

I get 600 at 384mhz. beat that

Linpack goes multithread!!

Finally we have a fair test for the dual cores. Just been running it and i have the top 5 scores!!

Is that 1608mhz , your phone must be on fire

Now have 150.595. It was a bit warm. I expect it to fall as the number one soon, i m sure there are guys on here with over 1.7ghz. I cant seem to get that to stay stable.

Finally! My highest (1.2) was 122 although that was an inconsistent result. My average high is around 100. Wonder what the Sensation and Tegra devices are hitting.....
Regards.

Best i can do so far.

I'm getting wildly inconsistent results. Managed to get 120 at 1200mhz with a accuracy of 2.2 after a dozen runs.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App

Yeah you just have to keep trying until you get a high score with a valid accuracy. It wont let you save unless its consistently accurate.

MaBlo said:
I'm getting wildly inconsistent results. Managed to get 120 at 1200mhz with a accuracy of 2.2 after a dozen runs.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you set both minimum speed and maximum speed to 1200?

152 is my new high, thats it for a while, battery flat, phone rather warm!

140 is my best stable score, running @1.425ghz using Tegrak

rovex said:
152 is my new high, thats it for a while, battery flat, phone rather warm!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the top 10 has only your results in it, lol

Its the Moto Zooms i worry about., Although the Tegra is slower the Zoom seems to be able to hit up to 2GHz. We need a 1.8Ghz SGS2 to keep them down..
I do wonder if the Atom powered tabs will beat us though.

ph00ny said:
did you set both minimum speed and maximum speed to 1200?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I did.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App

I got 155.597 MFLOPS with my Galaxy S II overcloked to 1.56 GHz at 1.375v on Core voltage.
The rest is default.
I can probably break 160 MFLOPS if i take the CPU speed up to 1.65 GHz if i can get it to run stable there.

rovex said:
Its the Moto Zooms i worry about., Although the Tegra is slower the Zoom seems to be able to hit up to 2GHz. We need a 1.8Ghz SGS2 to keep them down..
I do wonder if the Atom powered tabs will beat us though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

Pagnell said:
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, my thoughts exactly reading this entire thread...

Pagnell said:
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's not even talking about a phone, if I understood what he meant, he's talking about the Xoom tablet.

[Sarcasm] Yes im going to have sleepless nights for weeks about it..[/sarcasm]
I would have thought the context (competitive spirit) was obvious..
Anyway it seem the Sensation bunch have found the Linpack cheat. 200 on a 1.2ghz non overclocked Sensation.. Nah...

Ok, now i managed to get 170.027 MFLOPS in Linpack with the CPU at 1.58 GHz and the Core voltage on 1.375v .
So far the phone are 100% stable at this clock.

Tom-Helge said:
Ok, now i managed to get 170.027 MFLOPS in Linpack with the CPU at 1.58 GHz and the Core voltage on 1.375v .
[image]
So far the phone are 100% stable at this clock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precision: Inconsistent Result

Quadrant standard scores! OC atrix!

Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
This is kp's rom.
UPDATE: Now im getting around 4200 on cm7 prebeta 2 with the built in oc and it feels alot smoother!

No! My highest was 303x!

My highest is always ~2900

3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

4700, and only running one core!

TechnoNeto said:
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?

How is it you were getting 4000 or 4700 on quadrant standard?

BravoMotorola said:
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is in beta so we could still see much improvement also you were getting that on quadrant or antutu?

mramirezusa said:
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as me is it saying that you are oc to 1.2 as mine does?

J-man67 said:
No! My highest was 303x!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you have set cpu to 1.1 min and max

hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.

my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.

dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You felt the need to express this why? This wasn't in the Q&A section as do benchmarks mean anything. It's a post about your scores not about people trying to prove their tech hierarchy.

dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.

I got a 3600 "in-use" benchmark, with max and min set to 1.1. With max at 1.1 and min still at .2, I still got 3200, which is not bad.
You seriously got 4000+ while on the phone's original stock system and everything??
Mine feels so much faster and snappier now on GB with the faux kernel and everything..

Tao_Man said:
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true and in response to first post i get around 3330+ with most of my apps going but i have both min and max set to highest in set cpu

As does mine feel faster on gingerbread

Tao_Man said:
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the way I test also. I'm around 3000 with all the normal apps running that I leave running and min and max CPU speeds kept where I use them. It feels very smooth!

I have an atrix benchmark thread!
\/

i can't seem to pass 2800 running stock

Fastest Evo Competition

Now that the Evo is rooted again lets see who can throw up the fastest benchmark numbers. Here's the rules.
1) Must have a screen shot of bench mark results
2) Include your rom and kernal
Let the games begin!

My evo is 9 inches long.

Benchmark scores are much like comparing penis sizes - if you do it on a forum, everyone is going to use someone else's photo or photoshop their own. Or just spout off some random large number, like the nine inches guy.
But, in contrast to penis sizes, benchmark scores don't matter. I personally have no clue what my scores would be, but my phone runs perfectly smooth so I'm not going to waste my time trying to make it faster just for bragging rights.
But I don't have a penis, so maybe I just don't get it.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

plainjane said:
But, in contrast to penis sizes, benchmark scores don't matter.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with everything you said, so youre saying size DOES matter?

I'm on my computer so no screenshot right now, but I consistently get 1000-1100 Quadrants with the following combination:
Synergy RLS1 non-GM
More Freedom 0.8.5 Universal
245-768 MHz, interactiveX, noop

You do know that quadrant scores can be changed by the user?

Art2Fly said:
I agree with everything you said, so youre saying size DOES matter?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We (and I'm speaking for most females here) will tell you otherwise, but size does matter to an extent. There's a little wiggle room, but yeah it makes a difference.
Girth is just as important, if not more important than length, and freakishly large penises are personally not much fun. But don't worry, it doesn't have to be as big as you think. I haven't slept with very many guys, but I have found that most of them thought that theirs was too small. Only one's was.
But no, benchmark scores don't matter. Not at all.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Yeah I can understand the girth part, I guess it's like being a musician, you never feel like youre good enough, even though god blesses you with.. talent.. anywho, i think its time to get it on.
I get 1300 with Miui.

We're talking about penis sizes? Hahahaha <3xda
Deck's + SZ + SuperCharger script + ViperMod script.

nice thats good

My quadrant score is 4.
Mflops is -12
Penis length is 7.1644" @ 75°F
Is that good?
Evo Deck 1.3b2, Tiamat 3.3.7, -75mV undervolt, 245/883mhz, smartass gov.

Running "[KingsROM][Alliance RLS-3] [ODEXED] [NETFLIX]SENSE 2.1+ 3.0 HybriD 3D " The BREED ", stock kernal. Might overclock, but I'm not THAT knowledgable on modding just yet.

LOL - Good to know size doesn't matter My Evo is hung like a hamster, but it's hell at 100 MPH. I try not to make him feel to bad by taking about his benchmarks and short comings. Fortunately for MY Evo he can fake how big he is in certain applications so it makes him feel better.

so.. whats the point of "size matters" if when I flashed Synergy+GM the score was way longer than regular synergy but way slower... makes no sense

Did I win?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

I'm a tripod.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Using cm7 savagezen kernal 245 min 1113 Max on demand. With v6 supercharger. I've gotten all the way into 1600s on past but I'm to lazy to reset phone and get it up to its Max tonight

I don't have screenshots, but I was running Synergy RLS1 + Godmode and I had a quadrant score of about 2000, but it didn't mean much considering how badly everything else performed.
I remember on stock OTA it was about 500. I'm on Synergy RLS1, and now I get about 1000.

did I win?
sent from a 3d fone
xrom odex
nertchy 1.0 kernel
1.72

notown775 said:
did I win?
sent from a 3d fone
xrom odex
nertchy 1.0 kernel
1.72
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...Something's not right here... >_>