Database Users

nenamark scores

what kind of frames/sec. are you guys getting in nenamark from the market. just curious

di11igaf said:
what kind of frames/sec. are you guys getting in nenamark from the market. just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
32.4 FPS (Need more text to post)

32.7 for me

shibby80 said:
32.7 for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heh. galaxy s i got 49.5
but honestly. all games run fine on nexus. why are we getting extra GPU if no software is using it is beyond me.
just to brag on the net ?

ll_l_x_l_ll said:
heh. galaxy s i got 49.5
but honestly. all games run fine on nexus. why are we getting extra GPU if no software is using it is beyond me.
just to brag on the net ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.

joebobjoe said:
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude
i am not dissin the phone.
i think both phones have great positives and negatives.
all i am just saying that these scores dont mean anything. because there is no game that use this extra power on the galaxy S gpu.
so for whats worth. u can get a 100 fps on either devices. but if all the games have a nexus 1 dev standard. then whats the point?

Just got a 35.0
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

joebobjoe said:
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMAO that is a funny azz post right there.

I just got 36.0 with it overclocked to 1.4ghz
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

39.9 FPS, G2 is overclocked at 1.2 GHz.

nenamark score
52.1 on Samsung Galaxy S running android 2.1 and lagfix.

39.7 fps with 1.4ghz overclock.

47.5fps
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fyeGhS624g
EDIT : Now getting 55.2 FPS. Pics coming
Some bastard got a 55.6 FPS score from Nexus S oc'd:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16615951/nexuss1200nm.png

G2 CyanogenMod 6.1.1 Stable (1.8 GHz Overclock)
Test #1 49.2
Test #2 50.2

47.4 fps
Tmo G2 OC'd @ 1.5GHz (Performance) using baconbits 0.3

Tops out at 47.8 in Nenamark with a 1.5GHz OC.
Im wondering when Gingerbread comes out are we gonna see some performance gains? The Nexus S is getting ridiculous scores at 1.2GHZ.

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=10282290#post10282290

htc vision oc at 1.5 android 2.3 gingervillian rom
nena result at 45fps

47.6 FPS
SetCPU on performance while OC'd to 1.5ghz

Nexus S is FAST!

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=894345
That thread shows proof of the attached pic below.
Perhaps this may give people a reason to switch to the Nexus S when it's released on Sprint.

We have pretty much all the same hardware. If I'm correct, hell the nexus one is still pretty damn fast. I believe that since GB calls upon the hardware to accelerate the ui that many graphical aspects are supercharged. I'm not saying our epics could hit that level stock but with Sprints bloat that would be almost impossible. Unless when we get CM7 fully we can match that. Just wishing lol.
Sent from The Epic Land Of The Lost.

Fyi that's on a oced kernel. Team whiskey got 1.4 stable on the nexus s. If we can get a 1.4ghz oc we would be just as fast. You notice from that screen its not showing the 2d or 3d results. Besides the cpu where right on target with memory and I/0.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

MysteryEmotionz said:
Fyi that's on a oced kernel. Team whiskey got 1.4 stable on the nexus s. If we can get a 1.4ghz oc we would be just as fast. You notice from that screen its not showing the 2d or 3d results. Besides the cpu where right on target with memory and I/0.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 its almost exact hardware only difference is
Keyboard/no keyboard and that is no where near a reason to want me to upgrade ill be waiting till most likely the Evo 3d comes out and i see the specs because Development behind that thing will also be huge

MysteryEmotionz said:
Fyi that's on a oced kernel. Team whiskey got 1.4 stable on the nexus s. If we can get a 1.4ghz oc we would be just as fast. You notice from that screen its not showing the 2d or 3d results. Besides the cpu where right on target with memory and I/0.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OP in the linked thread said - "Quadrant score w/trinity kernel running my modifications (2d/3d scores are 0 because quadrant does not currently support these tests for the Nexus S, its crashes)"
That's why the 2D/3D is 0. Still though, that's a beast score. LOL
I'm holding off for now (upgrade is available in April.) But these specs look promising.

Overstew said:
The OP in the linked thread said - "Quadrant score w/trinity kernel running my modifications (2d/3d scores are 0 because quadrant does not currently support these tests for the Nexus S, its crashes)"
That's why the 2D/3D is 0. Still though, that's a beast score. LOL
I'm holding off for now (upgrade is available in April.) But these specs look promising.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There just scores and mean nothing in real world.
Fyi: team whiskey is known for putting out placebos. Look at what they did with there 1.6kernel and they have between caught mounting there data differently to cheat quadrant. I forget the exact cheat but if we do it to the epic we would get those save scores. Remember the nexus s and the epic is almost identical. The only reason I will make the switch is cause of google support. To me that's the only thing the nexus s had over they epic
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

Nexus s is faster because of gingerbread the enabled hardware acceleration...
Until epic gets gb were not reaching those scores even with the same oc.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

So with my old viper rom I had on dk28 there was a terminal hack that would allow you to change the hardware exceleraton on ad it seamed to make the phone faster but I can't seem to activate it again when I switched to bonsai 3.0.1 is there another way to turn this on.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

omg Im so going to jump for the same Hardware and no keyboard now! Or not.. Im sure were going to get every update that the Sprint Nexus S gets a few weeks later (thanks to our devs) bc they're going to be the exact same phone except for the keyboard and that stupid chip the Nexus S has...

Double post...

There's a point at which these numbers mean nothing.
I have no lag on my phone with a Quadrant of 1902. A score of 3500+ wouldn't be much different...if at all. It's just a **** contest.

Is it really going to be that easy to port it over to the Epic?
Sent From My Command Center... (aka basement)

flopez76 said:
Is it really going to be that easy to port it over to the Epic?
Sent From My Command Center... (aka basement)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea if it comes to sprint with 4g.
the only diff. would be the Keyboard and the NFS chip
so our devs will kill it
it'll be as easy as making a fat girl horny

iSaint said:
Yea if it comes to sprint with 4g.
the only diff. would be the Keyboard and the NFS chip
so our devs will kill it
it'll be as easy as making a fat girl horny
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good analogy
epic

I'm getting it as long is it is clean android none of that samsung crap.

akijikan said:
I'm getting it as long is it is clean android none of that samsung crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As soon as Cyanogemnod is finished (already 85% of the way there) you will have "clean android" on the Epic without spending the money on the "upgrade"

063_XOBX said:
As soon as Cyanogemnod is finished (already 85% of the way there) you will have "clean android" on the Epic without spending the money on the "upgrade"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True that
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App

Moar mFlops plz

So I was running Salvage and now I'm running cm7 nightly 18 and I'm wondering: what's up with my benchmarking being so low? Can't seem to break 41 on Linpack and my quadrant scores are sticking in the low-1000s (they were up around 1300 on a fresh install).
I've seen other people who have had this complaint, and I know benchmarks aren't that important since my phone is running really well, but I want to see some seriously awesome results and I'm wondering if it has something to do with my kernel (savaged-zen), too many widgets on my hoam screen, playing too much ninjump, etc.

tubazeppelin said:
So I was running Salvage and now I'm running cm7 nightly 18 and I'm wondering: what's up with my benchmarking being so low? Can't seem to break 41 on Linpack and my quadrant scores are sticking in the low-1000s (they were up around 1300 on a fresh install).
I've seen other people who have had this complaint, and I know benchmarks aren't that important since my phone is running really well, but I want to see some seriously awesome results and I'm wondering if it has something to do with my kernel (savaged-zen), too many widgets on my hoam screen, playing too much ninjump, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Highest I broke was about 45 running a toast/net kernel on a sense rom with about 1600 on quads. I break about 41 on cm7 with savagezen. Its really hard to takes scores on the evo serious though they don't mean ish. I also had to delete linpack and quadrant from my phone cause I kept worrying/stressing about scores etc lol. Now I don't download them at all and my life has been great ever since.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App

dirkyd3rk said:
Highest I broke was about 45 running a toast/net kernel on a sense rom with about 1600 on quads. I break about 41 on cm7 with savagezen. Its really hard to takes scores on the evo serious though they don't mean ish. I also had to delete linpack and quadrant from my phone cause I kept worrying/stressing about scores etc lol. Now I don't download them at all and my life has been great ever since.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm thinking it might start coming to that. I just don't want to be sacrificing performance thanks to having things set up wrong. I'm coming from a Hero where your paltry 4.5 mflops were a true sign that you had your phone organized correctly, and it was going to randomly restart in 8 minutes because you had JIT running.

tubazeppelin said:
Yeah I'm thinking it might start coming to that. I just don't want to be sacrificing performance thanks to having things set up wrong. I'm coming from a Hero where your paltry 4.5 mflops were a true sign that you had your phone organized correctly, and it was going to randomly restart in 8 minutes because you had JIT running.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 I came from the hero also with 4.5 running darchdroid/cm6 lol. It wasn't going to get any better than 4.5 ahh I remember those days man. With the evo I don't recommend taking stock in scores because its just not gonna get any better. My chicks g2 out the box stock(800mhz) is 1550 on quads and like 60 on linpack lol of course w/ help of their newer processors. Our evos are kind of maxed out I guess you could say. Jit doesn't help much its only keeping our apps warm and ready not really effecting scores much. I'd say what were getting now is about the best man. I still love my evo and hopefully it will last until my upgrade this September when newer phones are out.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App

dirkyd3rk said:
+1 I came from the hero also with 4.5 running darchdroid/cm6 lol. It wasn't going to get any better than 4.5 ahh I remember those days man. With the evo I don't recommend taking stock in scores because its just not gonna get any better. My chicks g2 out the box stock(800mhz) is 1550 on quads and like 60 on linpack lol of course w/ help of their newer processors. Our evos are kind of maxed out I guess you could say. Jit doesn't help much its only keeping our apps warm and ready not really effecting scores much. I'd say what were getting now is about the best man. I still love my evo and hopefully it will last until my upgrade this September when newer phones are out.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man I was planning on upgrading in May but I got bit by the Sprint Premium downgrade, and all the sudden my upgrade turned into "use it or lose it" by April 1. I'd much rather be stuck with the EVO for 2 years than the Hero for another year. That poor little phone just doesn't cut it anymore. Right now I'm trying to figure out how I can get a full upgrade next year, or perhaps just get a new phone for Christmas, which is about the time I'll be sick of the EVO.
Still, for now I'm loving this thing. It's like going from an '88 Accord to a 2010 Cadillac.

Atrix quadrant scores

Hello everyone. What's a good quadrant score for a stock 860? I have been seeing 2600-2650 on average, is this fairly common for this model? Is there a good way to prepare to take the test by closing apps, features etc?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App

Ive been averaging consistent 2500 of four attempts in quadrant after the 4.1.57 update. I normally run it just after start up and I get those scores.

I achieved 2740 with 4.1.57

I've gotten around 2900 once, but it usually falls between 2650 and 2800. To be fair though Quadrant only tests a single core, if you compare it vs say an inspire on stock rom (Or probably even a custom) at stock clocks it will only get about 1900-2100. So really the Atrix gets 20%-30% better scores and it's only using 1 of 2 cores. Another thing you'd notice on the Atrix is it has nearly no slowdowns, even an Inspire running at a 1.8 OC (battery life is horrible) will bog when you install/update programs while doing something else because it's still a single core and needs to share cycles across programs where the Atrix can devote a core to all background activities and the other to what you're doing in the foreground. I didn't really notice how fast the Atrix was until I had to fix something on my girlfriends Captivate (Gave her mine when I upgraded) and she has like 25 apps and a custom rom with a 1.4 OC and OMG it felt so slow compared to my Atrix.

I got a 2774 with the gingerblur ROM. That's the best I've ever gotten and I've run it on stock, 1.52, the new update and gingerblur. Gingerblur has gotten me, by far the highest and most consistent scores of all. I usually run between 2600-2750 under normal usage, which is quite a bit.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

smartbench 2011 it said to support dual core. Have any of you run that app to see what kind of scores you get? On quadrant I get around 2400-2500.
With Smart bench I get around 2900 on productivity and around 2400 on game index

aszrael1266 said:
smartbench 2011 it said to support dual core. Have any of you run that app to see what kind of scores you get? On quadrant I get around 2400-2500.
With Smart bench I get around 2900 on productivity and around 2400 on game index
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about what I get, it's also funny (although not surprisingly) the single cores get obliterated except for a galaxy S because the GPU in those are amazing.

aszrael1266 said:
smartbench 2011 it said to support dual core. Have any of you run that app to see what kind of scores you get? On quadrant I get around 2400-2500.
With Smart bench I get around 2900 on productivity and around 2400 on game index
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe this will interest you:
smartphonebenchmarks.com/

Hianz said:
Maybe this will interest you:
smartphonebenchmarks.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw an Atrix running 2.3.3 in that listing. How is that possible? Faking the OS or something?

NoNameAtAll said:
I saw an Atrix running 2.3.3 in that listing. How is that possible? Faking the OS or something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you have to register in that listing. So Maybe he has registered false data. You only have to proof it with a screenshot when you are in the top 20.

i usually hit 2600-2800 on gingerblur but have hit 3000 before.

i got 2449 here

I average 2900 or so lately though I've been hitting 3000+ consistently. Im running rooted 4.1.57 pushing cpu to a constant 1ghz with setcpu. Hopefully once they get over clock we'll be on par with the xoom
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App

Clienterror said:
I've gotten around 2900 once, but it usually falls between 2650 and 2800. To be fair though Quadrant only tests a single core, if you compare it vs say an inspire on stock rom (Or probably even a custom) at stock clocks it will only get about 1900-2100. So really the Atrix gets 20%-30% better scores and it's only using 1 of 2 cores. Another thing you'd notice on the Atrix is it has nearly no slowdowns, even an Inspire running at a 1.8 OC (battery life is horrible) will bog when you install/update programs while doing something else because it's still a single core and needs to share cycles across programs where the Atrix can devote a core to all background activities and the other to what you're doing in the foreground. I didn't really notice how fast the Atrix was until I had to fix something on my girlfriends Captivate (Gave her mine when I upgraded) and she has like 25 apps and a custom rom with a 1.4 OC and OMG it felt so slow compared to my Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1-what kernel were you using when this 'bog' down happened at 1.8 ghz when something was updating. cause my inspire at 1.8 ghz while downloading a file through web, and updating apps in the market will still be faster than the atrix. ive NEVER even had so much as a hiccup at 1.8 ghz on my kernel, and i just did exactly that, downloaded a file, while 4 apps were updating in the market, and at the same time opened app to qr, and the apps loaded instantly. the atrix takes a few seconds for it to load up, with nothing at all going on, with all bloat removed and only the factory default apps on it. the inspire has over 100. also, i posted this elsewhere also, testing my kernel yesterday running at 1804 mhz all day long, i got over 16 hours off a charge with 3.5 hours screen on time. screen brightness was at 100%. if it was at 50 it could have went much longer. not horrible if you ask me. the inspire with a single core doesnt lag when a live wallpaper is put on it, and i can actually type on the keyboard without having to correct errors every other word cause its lags so bad.
just another note, my inspire rom and kernel at default 1ghz (no overclock) hit 2700+ quadrant

I just got 4000 on CM7

4900 with cm7 + overclock to 1.3ghz ;P
the motoblur software and at&t crap really slows stuff down.

Linpack goes multithread!!

Finally we have a fair test for the dual cores. Just been running it and i have the top 5 scores!!

Is that 1608mhz , your phone must be on fire

Now have 150.595. It was a bit warm. I expect it to fall as the number one soon, i m sure there are guys on here with over 1.7ghz. I cant seem to get that to stay stable.

Finally! My highest (1.2) was 122 although that was an inconsistent result. My average high is around 100. Wonder what the Sensation and Tegra devices are hitting.....
Regards.

Best i can do so far.

I'm getting wildly inconsistent results. Managed to get 120 at 1200mhz with a accuracy of 2.2 after a dozen runs.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App

Yeah you just have to keep trying until you get a high score with a valid accuracy. It wont let you save unless its consistently accurate.

MaBlo said:
I'm getting wildly inconsistent results. Managed to get 120 at 1200mhz with a accuracy of 2.2 after a dozen runs.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you set both minimum speed and maximum speed to 1200?

152 is my new high, thats it for a while, battery flat, phone rather warm!

140 is my best stable score, running @1.425ghz using Tegrak

rovex said:
152 is my new high, thats it for a while, battery flat, phone rather warm!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the top 10 has only your results in it, lol

Its the Moto Zooms i worry about., Although the Tegra is slower the Zoom seems to be able to hit up to 2GHz. We need a 1.8Ghz SGS2 to keep them down..
I do wonder if the Atom powered tabs will beat us though.

ph00ny said:
did you set both minimum speed and maximum speed to 1200?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I did.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App

I got 155.597 MFLOPS with my Galaxy S II overcloked to 1.56 GHz at 1.375v on Core voltage.
The rest is default.
I can probably break 160 MFLOPS if i take the CPU speed up to 1.65 GHz if i can get it to run stable there.

rovex said:
Its the Moto Zooms i worry about., Although the Tegra is slower the Zoom seems to be able to hit up to 2GHz. We need a 1.8Ghz SGS2 to keep them down..
I do wonder if the Atom powered tabs will beat us though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

Pagnell said:
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, my thoughts exactly reading this entire thread...

Pagnell said:
Let me get this straight, you're 'worried' about another phone putting in a better score than your phone on a benchmark program?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's not even talking about a phone, if I understood what he meant, he's talking about the Xoom tablet.

[Sarcasm] Yes im going to have sleepless nights for weeks about it..[/sarcasm]
I would have thought the context (competitive spirit) was obvious..
Anyway it seem the Sensation bunch have found the Linpack cheat. 200 on a 1.2ghz non overclocked Sensation.. Nah...

Ok, now i managed to get 170.027 MFLOPS in Linpack with the CPU at 1.58 GHz and the Core voltage on 1.375v .
So far the phone are 100% stable at this clock.

Tom-Helge said:
Ok, now i managed to get 170.027 MFLOPS in Linpack with the CPU at 1.58 GHz and the Core voltage on 1.375v .
[image]
So far the phone are 100% stable at this clock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precision: Inconsistent Result