Related
I did some testing. Here are numbers for those of you curious about performance. All were tested on the same Nexus One, more to come soon!
Paulobrian 2.2 /w cyano 2.6.34 kern @ 1113 Mhz
Set CPU
Short - 206 ms
Long - 345 ms
CPU Benchmark
660 ms 1113 mhz
Benchmark
Graphics
Total Graphics Score - 30.36
Draw Opacity Bitmap - 10.80 Mpixels per sec
Draw Transparent bitmap - 7.77 Mpixels per sec
CPU
Total CPU Score - 2491.91
MWIPS DP - 166.94
MWIPS SP - 187.62
MFLOPS DP - 19.03
MFLOPS SP - 26.79
VAX MIPS DP - 142.033
VAX MIPS SP - 141.58
Memory
Total Memory Score - 317.97
Copy Memory - 288.93 Mb/sec
Filesystem
Total Filesystem Score - 104.72
Creating 1000 empty files - 4.502 sec
Deleting 1000 empy files - 3.252 sec
Write 1M into file - 2.351 M/sec
Read 1M into file - 203.333 M/sec
Paulobrian 2.2 @ 998 MHZ
Set CPU
Short - 243 ms
Long - 378 ms
CPU Benchmark
750 ms 998 mhz
Benchmark
Graphics
Total Graphics Score - 28.53
Draw Opacity Bitmap - 10.14 Mpixels per sec
Draw Transparent bitmap - 7.30 Mpixels per sec
CPU
Total CPU Score - 2415.09
MWIPS DP - 157.48
MWIPS SP - 182.48
MFLOPS DP - 28.37
MFLOPS SP - 26.79
VAX MIPS DP - 138.70
VAX MIPS SP - 137.20
Memory
Total Memory Score - 367.81
Copy Memory - 334.22 Mb/sec
Filesystem
Total Filesystem Score - 116.88
Creating 1000 empty files - 5.95 sec
Deleting 1000 empy files - 4.393 sec
Write 1M into file - 2.59 M/sec
Read 1M into file - 232.56 M/sec
CM 5.0.7 2.1 @ 1113 Mhz
Set CPU
Short - 248
Long - 848ms
CPU Benchmark
855ms 1113 mhz
Benchmark
Graphics
Total Graphics Score - 31.505909
Draw Opacity Bitmap - 11.191257 Mpixels per sec
Draw Transparent bitmap - 8.078896 Mpixels per sec
CPU
Total CPU Score - 794.6353
MWIPS DP - 60.86
MWIPS SP - 60.75
MFLOPS DP - 9.26
MFLOPS SP - 10.01
VAX MIPS DP - 40.39
VAX MIPS SP - 39.51
Memory
Total Memory Score - 335.01
Copy Memory - 304.41 Mb/sec
Filesystem
Total Filesystem Score - 114.35
Creating 1000 empty files - 5.30 sec
Deleting 1000 empy files - 3.99 sec
Write 1M into file - 2.79 M/sec
Read 1M into file - 227.27 M/sec
I'm not getting how the graphics are worse on 2.2 over CM.
halorin said:
I'm not getting how the graphics are worse on 2.2 over CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I found that kind of odd too...
Well, the 2.1 kernel is overclocked by about 10%, and the difference in total graphics score is about 11%, so this leads me to believe that graphics speeds would remain the same if these tests used the same clock speed.
Re: [Benchmarks] Paulobrian 2.2 vs CM 5.0.7 2.1
So basically 2.2 will have stock phones almost where we have all been for months with 2.1
deprecate said:
So basically 2.2 will have stock phones almost where we have all been for months with 2.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's funny you say that, but my coworker has a N1 unrooted and I will do something for him on his phone and you can definitely tell a difference. Mine is SOOO much smoother and faster...Once you go root, you never go back!
You should also consider that the 2.2 we have is not the full update and that Cy's is HEAVILY optimized and overclocked. This tells me that when we get the real 2.2 and optimize it, it will blow Cy's out of the water
Kind off a lousy comparison. Click 'em both to 998 min/max and then see what the differences are.
Mi|enko said:
Kind off a lousy comparison. Click 'em both to 998 min/max and then see what the differences are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to just show the performance of the best of each rom.
It's an acknowledgment of cyanogen's excellent work, to be sure.
But if you want flash and tethering, similar performance all with a stock OS and kernel, well Froyo is the cat's ass.
tengtou said:
I wanted to just show the performance of the best of each rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You actually showing the performance of the kernel not the rom, and no even mentioning the kernels.
JCopernicus said:
You actually showing the performance of the kernel not the rom, and no even mentioning the kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not sure what kernals they are, just the roms itself, and whichever kernals came with it...
custom374 said:
You should also consider that the 2.2 we have is not the full update and that Cy's is HEAVILY optimized and overclocked. This tells me that when we get the real 2.2 and optimize it, it will blow Cy's out of the water
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or perhaps, once Cy gets his hands on 2.2 (when published to aosp), we will see just how amazing froyo can be when unrestricted.
deprecate said:
Or perhaps, once Cy gets his hands on 2.2 (when published to aosp), we will see just how amazing froyo can be when unrestricted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant wait!
Let's post the scores here with detailed scores from Antutu, for quadrant you can also post the detailed one if you have the full version.
Please also post your mod and settings in the device to help others in increasing their Tabs performance also the devs to help them get the idea of their current mod states.
Antutu scores :
Memory : 496
C. int : 872
C. float : 203
2d : 193
3d : 553
IO : 20
SDC write : 107
SDC Read : 180
Total 2624
Quadrant score : 2381
Settings : Overcome 1.2, undervolt 200 200 100 100 100 100 100 100, set cpu on conservatif 100-1.4 Ghz
NB : You can get antutu and quadrant from the market. And this is synth test, not real world performance. Just to help us get the idea to bring the max out of our tab.
And if you could post the screenshot it would be great as i dont know how to yet.
Cheers
Settings posted. IO seems lacking on antutu isn't it?
Bump, no one interested in cross checking their tabs performance?
Come on guys do post!
I kept getting 0.0. I must be doing it wrong. Please help.
alphard_alshua said:
Bump, no one interested in cross checking their tabs performance?
Come on guys do post!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude, mine is very bad!! take a look. can I improve it?
why my current settings processor is only 400Mh?
thanks!
jaypm007 said:
I kept getting 0.0. I must be doing it wrong. Please help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try antutu first.
ovigt71 said:
dude, mine is very bad!! take a look. can I improve it?
why my current settings processor is only 400Mh?
thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try set it from set cpu, and range it 600-1400 while the screen on and make 100-600 screen off profile.
alphard_alshua said:
Try set it from set cpu, and range it 600-1400 while the screen on and make 100-600 screen off profile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you be a little more specific? do I have to install any additional app for that? thanks
I think, now it's better....
Sorry for the late reply. Yea that is more like it. You can download the set cpu by searching this forum.
I was wondering why is the IO so low on antutu, i guess it's the same for all. Max i could get is 20 on IO perf.
it's fine ! i got this. now i'm testing, and i'll come with a feedback after
and this is my Tab
how did you take SS from the tab?
alphard_alshua said:
how did you take SS from the tab?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Push front back button together with volume up in the same time.
Mine is Motorola Charm - MB502
Memory : 213
CPU Integer : 412
CPU Float : 99
2D Graphic : 94
3D Graphic : 215
Database IO : 205
SD Card Write : 87 (8.7MB/s)
SD Card Read : 97 (9.7MB/s)
Date : 2011-06-15 13:06
Total scores : 1422
seems I between the Motorola Milestone and Nexus One... hehehe...
i9100g antutu
my galaxy s2 (i9100g) @1200mhz scored 6008,android ver. 2.3.4
My tab running miui
linux150
benchmarks
here are benchmarks of my galaxy s2 (i9100g):
@1200mhz android 2.3.6,cranium kernel
Simple.
Im currently using GingerDx v23 still..the PrimeHD seems awesome.
Can someone tell their experiences with these roms?
Which is faster? More smoother.
On stock kernel without oc or with some oc like 614mhz or similar!
I really dont want any kernel results or big OC-ing.
We know that these methods improve our phone speed!
Dude..sorry for saying this but you must not compare one ROM with other ROM since different user might having different experiences..if you are so currious with their experience, why don't you read the thread where the user express their experience..and why don't you try the ROM you want to compare with so you know the differences..
No heart feeling dude..
Cheers..:beer:
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
A fine gentleman you must be.
Still your right.
But the feedback is positive mostly.
Ginger had some battery issues,but thats fixed.
Also Im thinkin that somebody tried them both,so he could just say what he thinks.
Also gonna run the benchmark later. Post pics here with Ginger Dx then try the PrimeHD and compare the results.
had run both of them personal statement "the most stable and fast rom primeHD"
Sent from my E15i using XDA
I endorse
Sent from my X8 using XDA
Medo2 said:
Simple.
Im currently using GingerDx v23 still..the PrimeHD seems awesome.
Can someone tell their experiences with these roms?
Which is faster? More smoother.
On stock kernel without oc or with some oc like 614mhz or similar!
I really dont want any kernel results or big OC-ing.
We know that these methods improve our phone speed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both the ROMs are awesome. For people who cannot unlock their bootloader GingerDX is good, and for others who can PrimeHD is awesome, light, fast and awesome battery back up.... I have used GIngerDX v24 with Alfs v8 ICS kernel and currently using PrimeHD with nAa 11 Kernel...my vote is for Prime HD.....Hope this helps.
gingerdx is very awesome, but battery drain fast, i suggest prime hd for better battery life
GingerDx V024 is awesome for my stock kernel with NO OC.
However, PrimeHD has no battery drain unlike GDx, as I experienced it.
Personally, i found PRIMEHD to be better in terms of battery and light weight. It has a few non-relevant bugs (doesn't matter since they are hardly used)
But again, GDx has none... So both are good in their spheres
For my stock kernel and no OC, I use Prime HD
However, I recommend you to try both ROMS.
Just recently flashed PrimeHD last week and i think this is an amazing ROM... very smooth and fast plus good battery life for stock kernel...
Test
I made some tests with antutu on fresh installed GDX and PHD (without sd card,no OC):
GDX
First run: 1432 / 90 / 193 / 150 / 400 / 469 / 130
Second run: 1460 / 95 / 196 / 145 / 410 / 474 / 140
Third run: 1472 / 95 / 194 / 150 / 407 / 471 / 155
PHD
First run: 1481 /114/ 201 / 150 / 404 / 482 / 130
Second run: 1495 /115/ 199 / 151 / 411 / 474 / 145
Third run: 1505 /114/ 201 / 151 / 408 / 476 / 155
I think primehd because its fast,smooth & best of all more free ram...
But gdx is recomended too for daily rom & as far as i remember,they will release also gdx with some ics(correct me if im wrong)...I dont know what it is but its cool...
GingerDX is in my point of view better than PrimeHD. It is much faster
Sent from my X8 using xda premium
I had Prime HD on stock kernel installed few apparently and it was very very slow and lag, now I use GingerDX v24 and it is much much better
Sent from my X8 using XDA
tonin_haggard said:
I had Prime HD on stock kernel installed few apparently and it was very very slow and lag, now I use GingerDX v24 and it is much much better
Sent from my X8 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used both of the roms for stock kernel and i have to say that both are great but I find primehd smoother and faster and also better for gaming . So my vote is for primehd!
Sent from my X8 using xda premium
lokibg said:
I made some tests with antutu on fresh installed GDX and PHD (without sd card,no OC):
GDX
First run: 1432 / 90 / 193 / 150 / 400 / 469 / 130
Second run: 1460 / 95 / 196 / 145 / 410 / 474 / 140
Third run: 1472 / 95 / 194 / 150 / 407 / 471 / 155
PHD
First run: 1481 /114/ 201 / 150 / 404 / 482 / 130
Second run: 1495 /115/ 199 / 151 / 411 / 474 / 145
Third run: 1505 /114/ 201 / 151 / 408 / 476 / 155
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And here you have the reason why you shouldn't take AnTuTu or any of the other synthetic benchmarks around overly serious. Looking at the first figure (CPU score) the result varies way too greatly with each run.
Anyway, while it's nice to see a few figures the greater sense of these comparison threads really escape me. Taking the drift rate of AnTuTu into consideration the averaged score is about the same and below any noticeable threshold (leaving the SD out of the equation as the difference between different X8's is simply too high due to the many classes of SDs).
As for ROMs that are actually DEVELOPED (and not some lousy apkedits by some wannabes) - I think everyone of us has a specific user-base, and having a selection of different ROMs is actually a good thing (keep in mind I still talk about ROMs that are actually developed and built from source).
HAKA does a excellent job and the same applies to nAa and his miniCM7|9 ROMs.
The question shouldn't be "<ROM> Vs. <ROM>" but rather "what do you like in the ROM you use most?"
Just my two cents.
just test
I was just curious and decided to make this experiment. In fact Im using GDX and I love it
Well you see these two roms are quite similar.
Both of them get updated and both of them got similar functions!
PrimeHD has all of GingerDx options..
pozdrav
i have used both of them and i get better antutu score with prime hd v6
it is kind`a smoother and i like it more for 2d and 3d performance,2d-410 3d-480
I get a much better battery life using PrimeHD than I ever did with GingerDX. Sometimes double... My record is over 3 days on one charge.
Although I have noticed something puzzling... I added 500MB of data to my phone 6 days ago and now I only have 150MB remaining and in that time I've only used it for SMS and a couple of calls, no internet usage. Is it possible that just syncing with my google account is using that much data?
I guess ginger dx is better. but in V024 i couldnt flash CWM zips ........... and i dunno why? Ginger dx wins Prime HD hands down .. I hav got lots of RAM issues with Prime HD as i run out of memory most of the time.... In my experience GDX wins I hope @B.Jay could give me a solution for the problem i have.......
Hi, in this theard i wanna make list of top Neocore score. Please write in reply name rom, kernel and height of overclocking.
WARNING! ACHTUNG! PLEASE ADDING SCORE WITH SOUND! PLEASE ADDING SREENSCHOOT OR PHOTO SCORE!
1.74 FPS - PrimeHD - Alfs8 cm7 - 768mHz - Mentafagyi
2.70.2 - MiniCM 2.2.0 - Alfs8cm7 - 748 mHz - sidkota
3.69 FPS - X8droid 7.0 - Alfs 8 - 768 mHz - santiago1104
4.67.5 FPS - GingerDX 25 - Alfs v8b - 806 mHz - Spevky
5.61.5 FPS - MiniCM 2.1.8 - nAa 10 - 806 mHz - RoberGalarga
5.61.5 FPS - Xperience 7.0 rev3 -nAa 11 - 748 mHz - Norbasenkos
Score of MiniCM7 2.1.8 + nAa kernel 10 @806Mhz in the attachment
My Neocore
With X8droid V 7.0 my neocore is 75.9 fps with 768 mhz Kernel Alf 8, my antutuscore is 2133 all work perfect,rom by Lucas Diaz, link x8droid2012.blogspot.com
EDIT:
Sorry, but add score without sound,,, with sound, the score is 69.0 Fps, sorry for the mistake
My score!
70.2 fps
MinICM7 2.2.0
Alfs-v8a
748 mhz
Neocore: 76 Fps
Cpu: 768 mhz
Rom: PrimeHD 8.0
Kernel: alfs8-cm7
Tweaks: new adreno libs and audio libs
Antutu: 2133 Points
Quadrant Standard 942 Points
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
norbasenkos said:
Hi, in this theard i wanna make list of top Neocore score. Please write in reply name rom, kernel and height of overclocking.
WARNING! ACHTUNG! Please adding score with sound!
1.76 FPS - PrimeHD - Alfs8 cm7 - 768mHz - Mentafagyi
2.75.9 FPS - X8droid 7.0 - Alfs 8 - 768 mHz - santiago1104
3.70.2 - MiniCM 2.2.0 - Alfs8cm7 - 748 mHz - sidkota
4.61.5 FPS - MiniCM 2.1.8 - nAa 10 - 806 mHz - RoberGalarga
4.61.5 FPS - Xperience 7.0 rev3 -nAa 11 - 748 mHz - Norbasenkos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
screenshots must be added for fair results, i can write 80fps, but without screenshot, its worthless... I'm nt saying peoples scores are fake, just saying coz there are many who just want to show off...
I will make a screenshot
I did not do, cause i longpressed power, and the score picture had hone
(I tested it continually for about a hour, when i reached it )
So i'll post it
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
GingerDX v25 - Alfs v8b - Score 67.5 - overcloacek to 806 mHz
Hi guys!
Im sorry, but you (the thread author) have to edit my score to: 74 cause i installed some games and it went lower
So i cant produce that score anymore, just if i reinstall PrimeHD 8.0, but i don't want to do it
And thank you for the edit, im looking forward to you
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
74.6 fps... MiniCM7
768Mhz
Alfsv8a CM7
n my own customizations...
Antutu cm9
any antutu cm9 score?
The ROM is Ginger DX on Stock Kernel and locked bootloader(F**k you Sony!)
My overclock settings.
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
48.2 stok kernel with sound,no oc
I think my best score was 62 FPS.
Sent from my XPERIA using XDA Premium.
Like 70 Fps on my X8
Sent from my ST18i using xda premium
Tested Before On A X8 at 72.9 FPS
Alfs Kernel and PrimeHD
I'm new in android world, and only use froyobread, with max score in case of 50 without overclock.
Sent from my X8 using XDA
Hi,
Recently Google added my country (Romania) to publish paid apps so i can get some money. My question is how can i create a "PRO" ribbon for my icon so the users will make a difference between regular and pro version?
photoshop.... paint ?
gimp?
Sent from my Acer S500 CloudMobile
Highly depends on your taste, i personally find those simple 'pro' tags hanging around in one of the corners pretty boring. Rather make a version of the icon with a different colour theme or sth like that
---------------------------------
Phone : Nexus 4
OS:
Pure KitKat 4.4.2 stock, no root, no mods
---------------------------------
4d 61 73 72 65 70 75 73 20 66 74 77
Gesendet von Tapatalk
Never thought about this...I might create another icon that looks simpler than the paid version
Masrepus said:
Highly depends on your taste, i personally find those simple 'pro' tags hanging around in one of the corners pretty boring. Rather make a version of the icon with a different colour theme or sth like that
---------------------------------
Phone : Nexus 4
OS:
Pure KitKat 4.4.2 stock, no root, no mods
---------------------------------
4d 61 73 72 65 70 75 73 20 66 74 77
Gesendet von Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
---------------------------------
Phone : Nexus 4
OS:
Pure KitKat 4.4.2 stock, no root, no mods
---------------------------------
4d 61 73 72 65 70 75 73 20 66 74 77
Gesendet von Tapatalk