I did some testing. Here are numbers for those of you curious about performance. All were tested on the same Nexus One, more to come soon!
Paulobrian 2.2 /w cyano 2.6.34 kern @ 1113 Mhz
Set CPU
Short - 206 ms
Long - 345 ms
CPU Benchmark
660 ms 1113 mhz
Benchmark
Graphics
Total Graphics Score - 30.36
Draw Opacity Bitmap - 10.80 Mpixels per sec
Draw Transparent bitmap - 7.77 Mpixels per sec
CPU
Total CPU Score - 2491.91
MWIPS DP - 166.94
MWIPS SP - 187.62
MFLOPS DP - 19.03
MFLOPS SP - 26.79
VAX MIPS DP - 142.033
VAX MIPS SP - 141.58
Memory
Total Memory Score - 317.97
Copy Memory - 288.93 Mb/sec
Filesystem
Total Filesystem Score - 104.72
Creating 1000 empty files - 4.502 sec
Deleting 1000 empy files - 3.252 sec
Write 1M into file - 2.351 M/sec
Read 1M into file - 203.333 M/sec
Paulobrian 2.2 @ 998 MHZ
Set CPU
Short - 243 ms
Long - 378 ms
CPU Benchmark
750 ms 998 mhz
Benchmark
Graphics
Total Graphics Score - 28.53
Draw Opacity Bitmap - 10.14 Mpixels per sec
Draw Transparent bitmap - 7.30 Mpixels per sec
CPU
Total CPU Score - 2415.09
MWIPS DP - 157.48
MWIPS SP - 182.48
MFLOPS DP - 28.37
MFLOPS SP - 26.79
VAX MIPS DP - 138.70
VAX MIPS SP - 137.20
Memory
Total Memory Score - 367.81
Copy Memory - 334.22 Mb/sec
Filesystem
Total Filesystem Score - 116.88
Creating 1000 empty files - 5.95 sec
Deleting 1000 empy files - 4.393 sec
Write 1M into file - 2.59 M/sec
Read 1M into file - 232.56 M/sec
CM 5.0.7 2.1 @ 1113 Mhz
Set CPU
Short - 248
Long - 848ms
CPU Benchmark
855ms 1113 mhz
Benchmark
Graphics
Total Graphics Score - 31.505909
Draw Opacity Bitmap - 11.191257 Mpixels per sec
Draw Transparent bitmap - 8.078896 Mpixels per sec
CPU
Total CPU Score - 794.6353
MWIPS DP - 60.86
MWIPS SP - 60.75
MFLOPS DP - 9.26
MFLOPS SP - 10.01
VAX MIPS DP - 40.39
VAX MIPS SP - 39.51
Memory
Total Memory Score - 335.01
Copy Memory - 304.41 Mb/sec
Filesystem
Total Filesystem Score - 114.35
Creating 1000 empty files - 5.30 sec
Deleting 1000 empy files - 3.99 sec
Write 1M into file - 2.79 M/sec
Read 1M into file - 227.27 M/sec
I'm not getting how the graphics are worse on 2.2 over CM.
halorin said:
I'm not getting how the graphics are worse on 2.2 over CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I found that kind of odd too...
Well, the 2.1 kernel is overclocked by about 10%, and the difference in total graphics score is about 11%, so this leads me to believe that graphics speeds would remain the same if these tests used the same clock speed.
Re: [Benchmarks] Paulobrian 2.2 vs CM 5.0.7 2.1
So basically 2.2 will have stock phones almost where we have all been for months with 2.1
deprecate said:
So basically 2.2 will have stock phones almost where we have all been for months with 2.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's funny you say that, but my coworker has a N1 unrooted and I will do something for him on his phone and you can definitely tell a difference. Mine is SOOO much smoother and faster...Once you go root, you never go back!
You should also consider that the 2.2 we have is not the full update and that Cy's is HEAVILY optimized and overclocked. This tells me that when we get the real 2.2 and optimize it, it will blow Cy's out of the water
Kind off a lousy comparison. Click 'em both to 998 min/max and then see what the differences are.
Mi|enko said:
Kind off a lousy comparison. Click 'em both to 998 min/max and then see what the differences are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to just show the performance of the best of each rom.
It's an acknowledgment of cyanogen's excellent work, to be sure.
But if you want flash and tethering, similar performance all with a stock OS and kernel, well Froyo is the cat's ass.
tengtou said:
I wanted to just show the performance of the best of each rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You actually showing the performance of the kernel not the rom, and no even mentioning the kernels.
JCopernicus said:
You actually showing the performance of the kernel not the rom, and no even mentioning the kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not sure what kernals they are, just the roms itself, and whichever kernals came with it...
custom374 said:
You should also consider that the 2.2 we have is not the full update and that Cy's is HEAVILY optimized and overclocked. This tells me that when we get the real 2.2 and optimize it, it will blow Cy's out of the water
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or perhaps, once Cy gets his hands on 2.2 (when published to aosp), we will see just how amazing froyo can be when unrestricted.
deprecate said:
Or perhaps, once Cy gets his hands on 2.2 (when published to aosp), we will see just how amazing froyo can be when unrestricted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant wait!
Related
So,
Just compared most of the versions found here, before I start on my own work, I thought stuff it, do it. Here is the outcome:
XXJPM - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 994
OCLF - 1845
RAM - 114/304
XXJPK - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 1025
OCLF - 1917
RAM - N/A
Tayutama Edition v1.0.0 [I9000XXJPM] 14/10/2010
Lite
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 748
OCLF - Does not work
RAM - 139/304
Full
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 951
OCLF - 1830
RAM - 132/304
Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 875
OCLF - N/A
RAM - 113/304
Thanks for your work!
Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 875
A little lame, my voodoo'ed stock Eclair got sth. around 2000, gonna OCLF 2.2 now.
nitr8 said:
So,
Just compared most of the versions found here, before I start on my own work, I thought stuff it, do it. Here is the outcome:
XXJPM - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 994
OCLF - 1845
RAM - 114/304
XXJPK - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 1025
OCLF - 1917
RAM - N/A
Tayutama Edition v1.0.0 [I9000XXJPM] 14/10/2010
Lite
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 748
OCLF - Does not work
RAM - 139/304
Full
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 951
OCLF - 1830
RAM - 132/304
Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - N/A
OCLF - N/A
RAM - 113/304
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Put in Sztupy's experimental ROM too the one that says NO RFS, its pretty good. I got a linpack 20+ & Quadrant 2000+ pre-rooted, NO LAGFIX.
ragin said:
Put in Sztupy's experimental ROM too the one that says NO RFS, its pretty good. I got a linpack 20+ & Quadrant 2000+ pre-rooted, NO LAGFIX.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sztupy's has an experimental lagfix included. (The lagfix is the whole point of the rom)
Vanilla JPA - Quadrant - 999
RAM - 113MB
RyanZA said:
Sztupy's has an experimental lagfix included. (The lagfix is the whole point of the rom)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's strange that we call the replacement of a filesystem "lagfix"
This obsession with Quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate Quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. OCLF on top of Voodoo gives you 2500 Quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally I'm waiting for Voodoo b5.
I'm currently using Doc's Mod for JPM/JP6 and I got 1030 Quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the OP said it wouldn't run.
with the same rom, if you run the quadrant test several times, the score varies...
all froyos are scoring about 900 - 1050 without LagFix and 1800 - 2000 with lagfix
chambo622 said:
this obsession with quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. Oclf on top of voodoo gives you 2500 quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally i'm waiting for voodoo b5.
I'm currently using doc's mod for jpm/jp6 and i got 1030 quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the op said it wouldn't run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+10000000 :d
Imo none of these benchmarks are able to really rate the overall perfomance of the different firmwares...
Reminds me a bit of DirectX-Benchmarks, same show but different artists
chambo622 said:
This obsession with Quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate Quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. OCLF on top of Voodoo gives you 2500 Quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally I'm waiting for Voodoo b5.
I'm currently using Doc's Mod for JPM/JP6 and I got 1030 Quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the OP said it wouldn't run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it actually does give what it says and it's no quadrant error. It's just that probably no app other than a badly coded touch wiz launcher will ever need a faster memory.
Try noticing differences on your system with a 5600RPM HDD and a 7200HDD.
You won't feel any difference and only benchmarking software will be able to tell.
However if it's possible (because rfs is a crappy file system) why not replace it?
It's like going from FAT32 to NTFS, it's there, it's better so why not use it?
^^ welcome after, there's like three mods trying to accomplish right now..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
How about we start an official database for all benchmarking we can do on the Fascinate? Here is every free benching app I could find. My phone is stock 2.1 for now. After FroYo I plan on overclocking the piss outta this beast!
System info:
SGH-I500 Fascinate
non-root 2.1update1 Eclair
OS: 2.6.29
BogoMips: 997.7
Bone stock outta the box. Sorry no screengrabs since I haven't rooted the phone.
*An3DBench - 6581
*Quadrant - 878
*Neocore - 55.9fps
*Linnpack - MFLOPS 8.181 / Time 10.025 sec / Norm Res 5.68
*DroidBooster - 21.7218% increased performance
*CPU Benchmark - 799ms
*GPU Benchmark - Absolute - 34155 Relative - 31999
*NBench -
INTEGER INDEX : 13.977
FLOATING-POINT INDEX : 1.395
MEMORY INDEX : 2.915
INTEGER INDEX : 3.990
FLOATING-POINT INDEX : 0.774
*NENA - 50.4fps
*Caffeine Mark labs with DroidBooster - Raw 12777, 4.5 Stars, Rank - 9
*FPS2d - 1000 iterations. avg-55fps stdev-4.97fps
*CaffeineMark - 1805
*RLBenchmark
SQLite - SCH-I500 (SDK:7)
Benchmark Results:
1000 INSERTs - 63.337 sec
25000 INSERTs in a transaction - 3.852 sec
25000 INSERTs into an indexed table in a transaction - 4.612 sec
100 SELECTs without an index - 0.211 sec
100 SELECTs on a string comparison - 0.086 sec
Creating an index - 2.82 sec
5000 SELECTs with an index - 2.116 sec
1000 UPDATEs without an index - 9.648 sec
25000 UPDATEs with an index - 8.047 sec
INSERTs from a SELECT - 7.55 sec
DELETE without an index - 5.85 sec
DELETE with an index - 6.041 sec
DROP TABLE - 6.866 sec
Overall - 121.036 sec
*BenchmarkPI - 2702ms
*Speed PI - Calculated to 1,000,000 digits: 659ms act.
*SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark 0.9.1 - Best Score = 12300.1ms +/-2% (Best browser I benched was Dolphin HD, believe it or not. I benched it along with Skyfire Beta(close behind at 13983.5ms+/-6.6%), the newest FireFox Beta(way slower score over 26600ms), Opera Mobile(not too far off at 14050.0ms +/-4.6%), and NetFront Life(dismal at over 36000ms). And at least on my machine, today, with my Un-rooted stock 2.1, Dolphin HD has the fastest java based score among them all in SunSpider.)
*Eyes+Chrome - 22 Asterisk**
**Including thread title.
I fail to see the point of this thread. A forum thread is most certainly not a database for storing benchmark data, and that data itself is useless without any context. Unless you're comparing multiple ROMs, of the SF to other phones, the numbers are meaningless, and I see no comparisons being made here.
Now, if you file that data away, and present it again later in comparison with the numbers from the same tests on the official Froyo ROM (once it's released), then I will be somewhat interested. ;-)
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Haters...
Stock 2.1 Rooted with Voodoo lag fix
Quadrant: 1780
Instead of tearing down, why not contribute? Post up benchmarks of other ROMs.
Then we can compare.
I didn't say this thread was only for box stock SF devices.
My fascinates screen gave me a boner. That seems to be a common occurence. Slap that on there with benchmarks. BTW, not calling u a liar but I have NEVER seen neocore above 55.7. And I have a captivate as well,( well had). Odd. I'm all for it. I don't see why not, put up all the benchmarks from all the different ROMS.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
benchmarks mean very little on this phone. you can get huge quadrant scores from one of the old overclock voodoo kernels but they will not stand up to the newer non oc kernels in everyday use.
Very simple question,how overclock work on your X8
Answer like this in post:
Works: Super
It make worst: Nothing
Make better: Everything
From when did you see some better results with OC (example:flashing new rom) : From flashing latest kernel 2.1.1.C.0.0,got 18 fps in 2d
Max cpu rate: 748 mhz
Min cpu rate: 128 mhz
Worked: Good
It made worst: Destroyed my motherboard (I had to send it for repair)*
Made better: Phone was somehow faster
From when did you see better results with OC: When I flashed a version of Hackdroid by racht
Max cpu rate: 710 mhz
Min cpu rate: 128 mhz
*That's why I don't use OC anymore...
Worked: Not too good
It made worst: I had lower fps in tests and lags
Made better: On some of my trying ROMs fon was faster
From when did you see better results with OC: On floyo v0.20/v0.25/v0.30
Max cpu rate: 710 mhz
Min cpu rate: 128 mhz
I don't use OC now, because i useing FroyoBread v0.18
Returns to 600mhz
I can not use the overclock because when I reboot the phone it is on 691Mhz soon after he returns to 600mhz. I know that the CPU clock is dynamic, but he never returns to 691mhz. What did I do wrong? I used the XDA tutorial for overclocking.
don't work yet
I just try full wipe and did not work. I think it's some parameter or file permission...
If the SGX540 in P1000 can be overclocked to 370MHz, the performance of it can be highly improved like in Overcome Kernel.
(Can be showed in Quadrant Standard Edition. When it is in 370 MHz, the fps in the graphic animation of DNA can be promoted to 60fps. And got no lagging in anything. The speed(smoothness is nearly reached S2 which is official 2.3.6)
But however, it doesn't seem that any ICS supporting kernel can set the clock of GPU.
I am sorry that my English is not good enough to represent my idea, but I hope you can get what I am talking about.
And the most reason I want it to be real is that the potential of P1000 is quite big and in fact it is quite good!
PS Antutu SetCPU app can set GPU clock in Overcome Kernel.
Dang, I never knew that our GPU can be overclocked ^^
since this tab is getting old, maybe its time to overclock the gpu also?
Personally I'm agree with this
Probs a little off topic, (also to bump this up a bit)
But the Gnex which uses the same GPU can be overclocked to 512Mhz (Stock is 300 something I think), improvement seems noticeable in apps and in nenamark, you go from 27-28ish FPS to 31-32.
It would really help the tab, it seems to show age now (which makes me lust over a 7.7......)
What I knew is the potential of SGX540 in GNexus and GT are different.
GT one is 200MHz and GNexus one is 374MHz.
In Overcome Kernel w/ GT, the clock of SGX540 can be set to 370~38X Mhz w/ no crush but when it is 400MHz , the machine is seemed to be lagged.
The benchmark in Overcome 4.1 plus Overcome Kernel 4.0 can be promoted over the GT 7.7 (of course the mark doesn't represent the real using experience but let's just look at the 3D mark)
http: / / i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/ngtinching/SC20120401-173417.jpg
edwardplus said:
What I knew is the potential of SGX540 in GNexus and GT are different.
GT one is 200MHz and GNexus one is 374MHz.
In Overcome Kernel w/ GT, the clock of SGX540 can be set to 370~38X Mhz w/ no crush but when it is 400MHz , the machine is seemed to be lagged.
The benchmark in Overcome 4.1 plus Overcome Kernel 4.0 can be promoted over the GT 7.7 (of course the mark doesn't represent the real using experience but let's just look at the 3D mark)
http: / / i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww300/ngtinching/SC20120401-173417.jpg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, yea I know they have different potentials Just that I thought I'd let you guys know how much better overclocking the GPU would be.
I think its worth it, there is little impact on battery life, but the improvements in apps and usage are noticeable.
FC1032 said:
Haha, yea I know they have different potentials Just that I thought I'd let you guys know how much better overclocking the GPU would be.
I think its worth it, there is little impact on battery life, but the improvements in apps and usage are noticeable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the battery usage for extra cost of GPU is not as high as CPU.
It is being a great difference if we compared the overclocking for either CPU and GPU.
The consumption of GPU is low and it won't make the device hot as CPU overclocking.
And the temperature can keep around 35 to 36 degree Celsius under a room temperature 20 Degree Celsius.
The result screenshot I have posted is undergoing CPU overclocked (1.4GHz) plus GPU overclocked(370MHz) w/ overcome kernel and rom.
Success!!!
edwardplus said:
If the SGX540 in P1000 can be overclocked to 370MHz, the performance of it can be highly improved like in Overcome Kernel.
(Can be showed in Quadrant Standard Edition. When it is in 370 MHz, the fps in the graphic animation of DNA can be promoted to 60fps. And got no lagging in anything. The speed(smoothness is nearly reached S2 which is official 2.3.6)
But however, it doesn't seem that any ICS supporting kernel can set the clock of GPU.
I am sorry that my English is not good enough to represent my idea, but I hope you can get what I am talking about.
And the most reason I want it to be real is that the potential of P1000 is quite big and in fact it is quite good!
PS Antutu SetCPU app can set GPU clock in Overcome Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, i have been trying to implement LiveOC into humberos's kernel and it is a success
LiveOC
This allows us to modify the bus speed which increase both the cpu and gpu clock at the same time using an app called NStools
i have only been using this for a day now and it seems to be working very well
please report back any bugs thank you,
BTW i will post the settings i have used in NStools and this kernel is for the latest MTD build
Link: http://www.4shared.com/file/216rF_WJ/boot.html?
My settings:
Governor: smartassV2
min CPU freq: 200MHz (240MHz after applying OC Value)
Max CPU freq: 1000MHz (1200MHz after applying OC Value)
OC target low: 200MHz
OC target high: 1000MHz
OC Value: 120%
hello20 said:
Hello, i have been trying to implement LiveOC into humberos's kernel and it is a success
LiveOC
This allows us to modify the bus speed which increase both the cpu and gpu clock at the same time using an app called NStools
i have only been using this for a day now and it seems to be working very well
please report back any bugs thank you,
BTW i will post the settings i have used in NStools and this kernel is for the latest MTD build
Link: http://www.4shared.com/file/216rF_WJ/boot.html?
My settings:
Governor: smartassV2
min CPU freq: 200MHz (240MHz after applying OC Value)
Max CPU freq: 1000MHz (1200MHz after applying OC Value)
OC target low: 200MHz
OC target high: 1000MHz
OC Value: 120%
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll give that a try when I get home (or maybe a few days later). So which ICS rom did you try this on?
EDIT: In terms of quadrant (which I know can be a bit volatile... but a nice way/quick way to see differences), ICS gets a lower mem score :< 3d is slightly lower, 2d is about double (I suspect thats forcing 2d rendering). This is comparing the gtab score in quadrant, I haven't used GB on my tab for a longgg time...)
how can i implement the boot.img file into the system???
tidusdacapo said:
how can i implement the boot.img file into the system???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This kernel is one i did 2 months ago and since then it has been updated. the kernel is in my most recent ROM
henryedwardrose said:
This kernel is one i did 2 months ago and since then it has been updated. the kernel is in my most recent ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the information
as a newbie, i just thought another aokp by stimpz0r is identical
there is a strange point which is the fc of the camera while the shutter sound is closed, but it works while enabling the shutter sound
It is a great rom and thank you for your great work
gaming settings for snapdragon 615
i use Poison-Kernel v5.0 with AIM rom 7.1.2
thermal throttle tweak for better preformance : [Tweak][Performance Like crazy][Z00T/Z00L]Antutu 41k on mostly any ROM (use google)
Cpu gov: impulse (for both clusters) * if the game lags put big cores on preformance governor and little cores on impulse* (this way big cores will work on maximum speed ,and little cores will use only one core on 200mhz)
Cpu freq: Big cores min. 200 mhz/ max. 1651 mhz
Little cores min. 200 mhz/max .1113 mhz
Hotplugging : msm_hotplug
Gpu initial frequency: 220mhz
Gpu governor :msm-adreno-tz
I/O scheduler: cfq
tested psp games : Spider man 2(full speed) , Naruto Shippuden - Ultimate Ninja Heroes 3(full speed),Soulcalibur: Broken Destiny(30 fps),Godfather (mostly 30fps ,there are some dips but only for a second or two ),nfs most wanted (30 fps),little big planet(30fps),sid meier's pirates(max speed)
(i will put settings for ppsspp in a few days)
tested android games :
Free fire (30 fps)
PUBG (25-40 fps with PUBgfx+tool) ||there will be some dips in fps when loading new area||
* i will add screenshoot of settings soon*
FELL FREE TO UPDATE
Dzaky Spear said:
gaming settings for snapdragon 615
i use Poison-Kernel v5.0 with AIM rom 7.1.2
thermal throttle tweak for better preformance : [Tweak][Performance Like crazy][Z00T/Z00L]Antutu 41k on mostly any ROM (use google)
Cpu gov: impulse (for both clusters) * if the game lags put big cores on preformance governor and little cores on impulse* (this way big cores will work on maximum speed ,and little cores will use only one core on 200mhz)
Cpu freq: Big cores min. 200 mhz/ max. 1651 mhz
Little cores min. 200 mhz/max .1113 mhz
Hotplugging : msm_hotplug
Gpu initial frequency: 220mhz
Gpu governor :msm-adreno-tz
I/O scheduler: cfq
tested psp games : Spider man 2(full speed) , Naruto Shippuden - Ultimate Ninja Heroes 3(full speed),Soulcalibur: Broken Destiny(30 fps),Godfather (mostly 30fps ,there are some dips but only for a second or two ),nfs most wanted (30 fps),little big planet(30fps),sid meier's pirates(max speed)
(i will put settings for ppsspp in a few days)
tested android games : free fire (30 fps)
FELL FREE TO UPDATE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey... You've mentioned max clock speed for big cluster as 1651Mhz how's that possible... Is it a 1.7 GHz version ? I got z00ud 1.5ghz ... Or is it a feature from poison kernel... Just a clarity before I go for a dive
Levi21xD said:
Hey... You've mentioned max clock speed for big cluster as 1651Mhz how's that possible... Is it a 1.7 GHz version ? I got z00ud 1.5ghz ... Or is it a feature from poison kernel... Just a clarity before I go for a dive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey ,snapdragon 615 can go up to 1.7 ghz but on stock kernel it runs on 1.5ghz
stock kernel (stock rom): big cluster is locked down to 1.5ghz and when trying to play anything it goes down to 1.1ghz or 800mhz
poison kernel (any custom rom):big cluster goes to 1.7ghz (1651mhz) when playing it thermal throttles to 1.4or 1.3ghz
fire kernel (any custom rom): same as poison
||with thermal throttle tweak||
stock kernel (stock rom): not tested
poison kernel (any custom rom) : while playing games big cluster stayes at 1651mhz and Little cluster shuts down (or uses one core on 200 mhz) *using impulse/impulse for cpu governor*
fire kernel (any custom rom): not tested
Dzaky Spear said:
Hey ,snapdragon 615 can go up to 1.7 ghz but on stock kernel it runs on 1.5ghz
stock kernel (stock rom): big cluster is locked down to 1.5ghz and when trying to play anything it goes down to 1.1ghz or 800mhz
poison kernel (any custom rom):big cluster goes to 1.7ghz (1651mhz) when playing it thermal throttles to 1.4or 1.3ghz
fire kernel (any custom rom): same as poison
||with thermal throttle tweak||
stock kernel (stock rom): not tested
poison kernel (any custom rom) : while playing games big cluster stayes at 1651mhz and Little cluster shuts down (or uses one core on 200 mhz) *using impulse/impulse for cpu governor*
fire kernel (any custom rom): not tested
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never tried poison kernel but ... I used firekernel and it has only up to 1.5ghz I'm surprised poison let's you go an extra mile...that is not specified in the features list..... Well... I'll try it out and let you know here.... But I doubt why op would not reveal overclock ... So probably our device SoC is different... I've seen z00t with 1.7 but it's model number is different .. maybe ze661 or something.. mine is zd551kl
Levi21xD said:
I never tried poison kernel but ... I used firekernel and it has only up to 1.5ghz I'm surprised poison let's you go an extra mile...that is not specified in the features list..... Well... I'll try it out and let you know here.... But I doubt why op would not reveal overclock ... So probably our device SoC is different... I've seen z00t with 1.7 but it's model number is different .. maybe ze661 or something.. mine is zd551kl
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My device is ze600kl (z00md)
i have tried fire karnel and i did get 1651 mhz i flashed this edition ||FireKernel-r2.4f - (modified by op for 615)|| *it is very good for psp emulator*
if you read fire or poison threads you can find people that experienced overclock ........mostly 600kl models
Dzaky Spear said:
My device is ze600kl (z00md)
i have tried fire karnel and i did get 1651 mhz i flashed this edition ||FireKernel-r2.4f - (modified by op for 615)|| *it is very good for psp emulator*
if you read fire or poison threads you can find people that experienced overclock ........mostly 600kl models
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah... Now I understood.... It is SoC difference... Big oof...
Hello.
Do those kernels works on other Snapdragon 615 phones?
I have a Vodafone Smart Ultra 6, with TWRP 3.2.3-0 and Lineage 14.1 (no more updates from that version til now), and it throttles a.f. even @ room temps (like 20~24 °C) while the CPU seems to go up to 67~72 °C while working @ 100%, throttling to 800 MHz, and not keeping the 1467 MHz full speed on the big cores.
Maybe this phone doesn't have a great heat dissipation design (the SOC seems interfaced with a thermal pad to a thin shielding, then to the internal frame with a weird interfacing, at the center an adhesive part and on the sides a weird texture. Also the internal frame seems in plastic, covered with some aluminium powder or something alike.
Anyway thanks for every answer or suggestion.
Inviato dal mio Smart Ultra 6 utilizzando Tapatalk