Database Users

quadrant score

What scores do you guys an gals get?
My leo does around 1400 without any tweaks. Checked a tab in a store and it did not get over 1050.

Mine is just slightly above the Galaxy S (i-9000).

pkoper said:
What scores do you guys an gals get?
My leo does around 1400 without any tweaks. Checked a tab in a store and it did not get over 1050.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, with OLCF by Ryanz 1900 in my Tab.

994 w/o any tweaks

Daft one but what you sector tweek this piece of heaven?
Sent from my GT-P1000

Use even
Sent from my GT-P1000

Quadrant Scores
1007 with no tweaks, 2262 with RyanZA's OCLF filesystem tweak.
details

978 with the JK1 ROM on my Galaxy Tab. I should try with the filesystem mod, given how spectacular the IO improvements are !

For some reason i am unable to finish a run. Quadrant just stops at exactly the half-way mark and i have to kill it. Any ideas?

Post your 2.1 benchmark here

Please share it. Thank you
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk

539 Quadrant....

whats the point in benchmarking if its limited to 30fps?

neocore 27.7 fps

517 Quadrant

552
.

Quadrant - 547
Linpack - 6.973 MFLOP/s

james_2k said:
whats the point in benchmarking if its limited to 30fps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's lots of benchmarks you can do.. not just video recording... also a danger of this thread being a mess as everyone uses different tools.. It'll only be useful if people use the same benchmarking tools such as Quadrant and linpak.

i got 553 [Quadrant Advance]
little bit dissapointed, nexus 2.1, and motodroid 2.1 are better than ours,

quadrant :
517
sooo slow

quadrant - 560

quadrant 530

573.......

Quadrant: 517. Why is it so low? Ideas?
Linpack: 6,95 MFLOP/s

536 on mine

670 Quadrant
9.2 MFLOPS on Linpack

wtf, 670? sorry i'm gonna want some proof for that

http://db.tt/tlimV6b
http://db.tt/XXtlV8k

Quadrant: 1756
yeah, that's right it's not my X10, it's My Galaxy S
X10: 570

why is this varying between devices running on the same OS version??
Shouldn't our scores be the same? For the person who scored over 600 - are you running ADW launcher? I have a feeling ADW launcher is causing my score to be low by using too much of the CPU resources?!

quadrant scores using custom roms

alright here a thread to post your scores by using non-stock roms
first off i will start
rom used:
android revolution 2.0.14
set cpu:
1228 MHZ
max: 1228800
min: 122800
scaling: on demand
Quadrant:
4 runs scores here directly after booting:
1st run : 2578
2nd run : 2465
3rd run : 2424
4th run : 2526
in depth score from the 4th run:
total : 2526
cpu: 5807
mem: 1133
I/O : 4754
2d : 323
3d : 613

3704.
Coredroid 2.5 kamma 1.9bfs kernal at 1.5ghz

(sorry for my bad english)
Yesterday I root the phone, but I can only SetCPU with lower frequency (768 MHz or 384) and I can not find a program just to turn it up (overclock) ... is there a way?

Moderator, please lock this thread
Uff, not this again.. Quadrant does not give accurate results of ROM's performance. It just does not. Then there are kernels that can "fool" Q to give better results, I mean kernels with different schedulers like BFS (brain **** scheduler). Any comparison between ROMs is pretty much useless when you use Quadrant.

jkoljo said:
Uff, not this again.. Quadrant does not give accurate results of ROM's performance. It just does not. Then there are kernels that can "fool" Q to give better results, I mean kernels with different schedulers like BFS (brain **** scheduler). Any comparison between ROMs is pretty much useless when you use Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree
they can chnge it in their custom kernels

jkoljo said:
Uff, not this again.. Quadrant does not give accurate results of ROM's performance. It just does not. Then there are kernels that can "fool" Q to give better results, I mean kernels with different schedulers like BFS (brain **** scheduler). Any comparison between ROMs is pretty much useless when you use Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
'a user' posted some info on why CoreDroid gives such high benchmark results with OC kernels. Total placebo effects.
@OP You judge a rom by how smoothly it runs for you, lag and stuff. When on earth are you ever going to use your phone to do something with DNA or play a game where the light dims and brightens over and over again. I mean, its fine for just testing and tuning, but real world results are more accurate.

Agree with the above posts.The only thing you can measure with Quadrant is your patience until you get what you expect!
But seriously,benchmarks like nenamark or linpack are far more accurate and represent real performance measurements.I personally run them once in a while to confirm that everything is running ok.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App

Leggenda said:
(sorry for my bad english)
Yesterday I root the phone, but I can only SetCPU with lower frequency (768 MHz or 384) and I can not find a program just to turn it up (overclock) ... is there a way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone can help me?

Leggenda said:
Anyone can help me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although you are completely off-topic...
Well,when in SetCpu tap menu,device selection and then autodetect speeds.It will ask for root,give it root rights and check the remember box in superuser's prompt.

ROM HIGHEST QUADRANT ? / galaxy 3 highest quadrant score ???

can anybody tell me how much highest quadrant score you got .. and in what rom/kernel .... plz if possible make a rom with highest quadrant score and 10point multitouch ( atleast 1100 points quadrant plz )

anxdateamcool said:
can anybody tell me how much highest quadrant score you got .. and in what rom/kernel .... plz if possible make a rom with highest quadrant score and 10point multitouch ( atleast 1100 points quadrant plz )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The samsung galaxy 3 is a very good basic smartphone that has evolved a lot since its release but I don't think you really understand what your asking here
As far as I know the highest multitouch points for this phone is 5 points so 10 is a little exaggerated
About the Quadrant score: a quadrant score doesn't reflect the full true capacity of your phone its based on a number of properties of the rom kernel etc. there are a bunch of tweaks to get a high quadrant score but a score of 1100+ is slightly overrated
A high quadrant score is of course fun to show off to your mates, but only the user experience can show the real capacity of your mobile phone
look my signature for my highest score on the G3

Blackyx007 said:
The samsung galaxy 3 is a very good basic smartphone that has evolved a lot since its release but I don't think you really understand what your asking here
As far as I know the highest multitouch points for this phone is 5 points so 10 is a little exaggerated
About the Quadrant score: a quadrant score doesn't reflect the full true capacity of your phone its based on a number of properties of the rom kernel etc. there are a bunch of tweaks to get a high quadrant score but a score of 1100+ is slightly overrated
A high quadrant score is of course fun to show off to your mates, but only the user experience can show the real capacity of your mobile phone
look my signature for my highest score on the G3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to that mate..
Sent from my hybrid g3
Kyorarom Infinity b2 powered by
g3mod 2.1 Final OC

Moderator Message
@OP
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!

Jelly bean vs gingerbread gaming and performance

Hi everyone I am currently running the NXT LE rom v1.3. I have tried various other roms but I find that this is the best one so far. Can you guys compare various roms and see which is better for gaming and performance, Jelly Bean (with new adreno drivers) or Gingerbread. Thanks
Every one list:
Kernel
Rom
Take Antutu Benchmark of your rom

from my experience, gingerbread is still the best android version for the xperia play
NXT LE with gin2jb theme,
Latest doomlord gb kernel
At 1017 Mhz
Score: 4288

Thinks too that a modified gingerbread is still the best choice for my Play. I saw that some guys got a bit higher Benchmark score on JellyBean but that doesn't mean that it is better for gaming. I really wish that more devs would pay more attention to GB.
Doomkernel v.14
DiXperia2
Antutu B. 6161 @ 1.8 Ghz.

Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post

SICKNOSIS said:
Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already tried some ics/jb roms but the performance wasnt that what i was looking for, id stick with gb
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app

Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Antutu
--1Ghz
Total : 5005
2D : 522
3D : 1950
--1.8Ghz (to align with above post clock)
Total : 6330
2D : 538
3D : 1959

I have a locked bootloader so no fancy kernels or overclocking, but I'm sure it could serve as a base to compare performance.
Nenamark 2 [GB]
First run: 14.0 fps
Second run: 13.6 fps
Third run: 14.0 fps
Fourth run: 14.2 fps
Fifth run: 14.1 fps
ROM: Xperia NXT Light Edition by Kris Dee v.1.3

Newest Adreno drivers for ICS/JB makes a huge difference albeit the RAM consumption is higher.

jcarbox said:
Newest Adreno drivers for ICS/JB makes a huge difference albeit the RAM consumption is higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was actually reported lower many times.

sewer56lol said:
It was actually reported lower many times.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparation nenamark2 score between default and update adreno driver on xperia neo l ics rom on my play, on default driver about 26 fps but on update driver about 31 fps.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app

Kernel: DooMKerneL
Unlocked Bootloader
Running at 1ghz on performance governor
Running Supercharger script too
Here's mine.
[GB]
1st run : 13.2 fps
2nd run : 13.4 fps
3rd run : 13.0 fps
4th run : 13.3 fps
5th run : 13.2 fps
ROM: Xperia NXT Light Edition by Kris Dee v.1.3

jabberwocky_one said:
Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW!!!! Your scores are much higher than mine and "aitmanga"'s scores. So I guess JB is much better for gaming, right?

Now I'm quite skeptical about that methodology. x2 more fps? I don't think so.
Anyone have any other idea on test methods? Antutu and quadrant scores aren't really useful unless you state the graphics score breakdown.
Edit: updated previous post with antutu for what it's worth.

I installed the SlimBean rom and tried Gta 3, it is no where as smooth as the nxt light rom ive been using, but the benchmark is like 29!!! Which is more than double my score on nxt light, but in real life performance JB is not as good as GB!! Even though the benchmarks show that it is
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app

Well, some games are bottlenecked by the GPU and others by the CPU. There's no general rule like 'if one game doubles its framerate, every game should be the same' so GTA3 can be CPU limited.
Probably Nenamark is very GPU intensive and a optimized GPU driver can do wonders but each game has its own CPU-GPU balance.

jabberwocky_one said:
Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, scores are almost same as on my setup.
Kernel is turbo jb from cosmicdan
Rom - pac from wedgess
1ghz performance
31.4 fps
1,6 performance
33,4 fps
Sent from my R800i using xda premium

ROM : NXT 1.3 LE
Kernel : Doomkernel v14
Antutu benchmark : [email protected],2ghz
Not too bad..
Sent from my R800i

4.0.2.A.0.58 Enhanced V2
Kernel : Doomkernel v14
Antutu v3.0.3 benchmark : [email protected] performance (normally set [email protected] ondemand)
not too bad even playing zombiewood smoothly, as long as you got enough free ram & set VM Heap size to 96m-128m

Devastator004
SICKNOSIS said:
Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would have agreed wih u and up unill i came across jb slim I thought that nxt light was the best jb slim bean it the only rom which is really come near to perfection the only downfall is that u cannot record but u can use the camera to take pictures via app from play store for free. and all the other features work to perfection u can overclock to 1.6ghz to play certain games which are too slow to play 4 exmple modern combact 4. also u can download games from google play store for free which arent even supose to be working on xperia play like shadow gun dead zone and all this is not even he best part when u flash it normally u get atleast 550mb internall free well thats becasue how small the actual rom it self is also this is the least laggyiest rom plus if u like to listen to music then it has apollo music player bonus points so despite the loss of the recording feature it overall makes up in compare to every other feature. :good: if u are inerested i personally tested it on xperia play r800i alos thishas been tested on r800x the link to this is if u are intersed that is :laugh::fingers-crossed::highfive:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=35493383

for gaming i recomend - Jellyzeus (JB) or CM9.1 (ICS) - both can run GTA VC really smoth on low settings (25%distance / 50%textures, all other low or off) ...
if you buy xperia play for hard gaming, i recomend - NXT Light Ed. - its best...
but if you play games like wheres my water / angry birds, and want JB, its a good choice...