Hi everyone I am currently running the NXT LE rom v1.3. I have tried various other roms but I find that this is the best one so far. Can you guys compare various roms and see which is better for gaming and performance, Jelly Bean (with new adreno drivers) or Gingerbread. Thanks
Every one list:
Kernel
Rom
Take Antutu Benchmark of your rom
from my experience, gingerbread is still the best android version for the xperia play
NXT LE with gin2jb theme,
Latest doomlord gb kernel
At 1017 Mhz
Score: 4288
Thinks too that a modified gingerbread is still the best choice for my Play. I saw that some guys got a bit higher Benchmark score on JellyBean but that doesn't mean that it is better for gaming. I really wish that more devs would pay more attention to GB.
Doomkernel v.14
DiXperia2
Antutu B. 6161 @ 1.8 Ghz.
Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post
SICKNOSIS said:
Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already tried some ics/jb roms but the performance wasnt that what i was looking for, id stick with gb
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Antutu
--1Ghz
Total : 5005
2D : 522
3D : 1950
--1.8Ghz (to align with above post clock)
Total : 6330
2D : 538
3D : 1959
I have a locked bootloader so no fancy kernels or overclocking, but I'm sure it could serve as a base to compare performance.
Nenamark 2 [GB]
First run: 14.0 fps
Second run: 13.6 fps
Third run: 14.0 fps
Fourth run: 14.2 fps
Fifth run: 14.1 fps
ROM: Xperia NXT Light Edition by Kris Dee v.1.3
Newest Adreno drivers for ICS/JB makes a huge difference albeit the RAM consumption is higher.
jcarbox said:
Newest Adreno drivers for ICS/JB makes a huge difference albeit the RAM consumption is higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was actually reported lower many times.
sewer56lol said:
It was actually reported lower many times.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparation nenamark2 score between default and update adreno driver on xperia neo l ics rom on my play, on default driver about 26 fps but on update driver about 31 fps.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Kernel: DooMKerneL
Unlocked Bootloader
Running at 1ghz on performance governor
Running Supercharger script too
Here's mine.
[GB]
1st run : 13.2 fps
2nd run : 13.4 fps
3rd run : 13.0 fps
4th run : 13.3 fps
5th run : 13.2 fps
ROM: Xperia NXT Light Edition by Kris Dee v.1.3
jabberwocky_one said:
Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW!!!! Your scores are much higher than mine and "aitmanga"'s scores. So I guess JB is much better for gaming, right?
Now I'm quite skeptical about that methodology. x2 more fps? I don't think so.
Anyone have any other idea on test methods? Antutu and quadrant scores aren't really useful unless you state the graphics score breakdown.
Edit: updated previous post with antutu for what it's worth.
I installed the SlimBean rom and tried Gta 3, it is no where as smooth as the nxt light rom ive been using, but the benchmark is like 29!!! Which is more than double my score on nxt light, but in real life performance JB is not as good as GB!! Even though the benchmarks show that it is
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Well, some games are bottlenecked by the GPU and others by the CPU. There's no general rule like 'if one game doubles its framerate, every game should be the same' so GTA3 can be CPU limited.
Probably Nenamark is very GPU intensive and a optimized GPU driver can do wonders but each game has its own CPU-GPU balance.
jabberwocky_one said:
Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, scores are almost same as on my setup.
Kernel is turbo jb from cosmicdan
Rom - pac from wedgess
1ghz performance
31.4 fps
1,6 performance
33,4 fps
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
ROM : NXT 1.3 LE
Kernel : Doomkernel v14
Antutu benchmark : [email protected],2ghz
Not too bad..
Sent from my R800i
4.0.2.A.0.58 Enhanced V2
Kernel : Doomkernel v14
Antutu v3.0.3 benchmark : [email protected] performance (normally set [email protected] ondemand)
not too bad even playing zombiewood smoothly, as long as you got enough free ram & set VM Heap size to 96m-128m
Devastator004
SICKNOSIS said:
Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would have agreed wih u and up unill i came across jb slim I thought that nxt light was the best jb slim bean it the only rom which is really come near to perfection the only downfall is that u cannot record but u can use the camera to take pictures via app from play store for free. and all the other features work to perfection u can overclock to 1.6ghz to play certain games which are too slow to play 4 exmple modern combact 4. also u can download games from google play store for free which arent even supose to be working on xperia play like shadow gun dead zone and all this is not even he best part when u flash it normally u get atleast 550mb internall free well thats becasue how small the actual rom it self is also this is the least laggyiest rom plus if u like to listen to music then it has apollo music player bonus points so despite the loss of the recording feature it overall makes up in compare to every other feature. :good: if u are inerested i personally tested it on xperia play r800i alos thishas been tested on r800x the link to this is if u are intersed that is :laugh::fingers-crossed::highfive:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=35493383
for gaming i recomend - Jellyzeus (JB) or CM9.1 (ICS) - both can run GTA VC really smoth on low settings (25%distance / 50%textures, all other low or off) ...
if you buy xperia play for hard gaming, i recomend - NXT Light Ed. - its best...
but if you play games like wheres my water / angry birds, and want JB, its a good choice...
Related
I'm sure you're all familiar with this benchmark test:
http://distinctivegame.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/dd-tech-talk-1-nexus-versus-iphone-3gs/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYqZK25KU3U
Its not a fair fight because:
1)The stock Android 2.1 OS does not utilize the new NEON instruction set yet.
2) the iphone is running at 480x320 where as the N1 is at 800x480. (i.e. the Nexus one's resolution is 2.5 times that of the 3GS...meaning atleast 2.5x the amount of processing). He did try running the game at 480x320 but got similar results with more fighters
Can someone with a new Custom ROM (compiled with NEON included) like the latest Cyanogen ROM, run this test again and let us know what you find.
update: Since nobody knows which game this is, lets try the free app "NeoCore" from the market so we see what kind of a difference NEON makes.
NeoCore. Dec 30/2009 Nexus One. 26.7 FPS
http://www.slashgear.com/google-nexus-one-3d-neocore-benchmark-video-3067327//
This is a weapon iphone users keep using against us and we need to set the record straight! (like the screen colors fiasco)
ps: I Do not know which game this is.
update 3/12/10, NeoCore gives me 27.1 FPS at 800x480 with my CPU at 1113Mhz
I'll be happy to run some tests if you can supply the correct link. I saw nothing but a long review(?).
Your link points at an HD2 vs. N1 shootout from Phonedog. Is this the video you are talking about?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYqZK25KU3U
flarbear said:
Your link points at an HD2 vs. N1 shootout from Phonedog. Is this the video you are talking about?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYqZK25KU3U
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! thanks
I'd be happy to run it if someone can give me a link to the benchmark program used.
It is very odd that the app/tool they used is mentioned nowhere.
A little googling for iPhone benchmark apps showed me that "GLBenchmark" has no android version, same with "Mad Monkey Tech"
There is a "NeoCore" free utility on the market though. Maybe we can at-least get some Neon/NonNeon FPS values.
Dec/2009 Nexus One. 26.7 FPS
http://www.slashgear.com/google-nexus-one-3d-neocore-benchmark-video-3067327/
I would very much be interested in the results as well..
Well I just ran neocore on cm 5.0.4.1 and it gets the exact same score. I'm pretty sure the app has to be compiled with neon support.
I got 26.0 FPS, stock ROM.
skozsert said:
Well I just ran neocore on cm 5.0.4.1 and it gets the exact same score. I'm pretty sure the app has to be compiled with neon support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if the app needs to be compiled specially in order to explicitely use the hardware FP instructions, or if the OS uses it automatically when enabled
NeoCore: 26.5 fps with sound, CM 5.0.4.1 with matching .33 UV kernel.
Well in the review linked in the original post it sounds like you need a compiler that uses the neon instructions as well as os support in order to take advantage of them. Isn't that how floating point extensions usually work i.e. mmx sse etc?
NeoCore gives me 27.1 FPS at 800x480 with my CPU at 1113Mhz. (UV/OC .32 kernel from 3/10, with NEON)
I've tried to overclock, lagfix, change roms and kernels, but I didn't see any big difference.
I would like to stay with real FPS benchmarks like GLBenchmark or others not like quadrant.
I've seen many people using ext2 instead of ext4, other say rfs is better, so I'm getting very confused. And also many people around here.
Each one of us has got a personalized SGS. Let's run each one of us GLBenchmark OpenGl 2.0 test without FSAA (The one of egypt) and see the results of each one of us.
Dlownload glbenchmark here: http://www.glbenchmark.com/download.jsp
Please specify model, rom, kernel, launcher, running apps, free mem before doing the test... Like every bit of info you can give, so we could find the best settings!
Thanks to all ! I'll run the test and post in few minutes!
Ok, here is the template 1.0 to use ;P just copy and paste and modify!
OK, got:
2438 Frames (21.6 Fps) with no fsaa.
My settings:
MODEL: European, I9000 SGS 16gb Vodafone
SPEED (GHZ): 1.0
LAUNCHER: Go Launcher
KERNEL: Lastest speed mod.
ROM: Darky's 8.0
LAGFIXES: On, System converted, on fast mount.
PROGRAMS INSTALLED: Very few, just wiped it.
FREE RAM: I forgot!
OTHER INFO: Wifi on, and overclock @ 1.2 makes worse FPS.
Lagfix will have no effect on glbench
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Bench marks do not say how responsive or laggy the phone is and unless you are obsessive with numbers are a waste of time .
jje
yes, but games performance is equal to FPS, so more FPS=More optimized system.
Just because that reason i proposed to use glbenchmark, as it is an only graphical test.
is there a way how to speed up the gingerbread on 3d gaming like on froyo?
in froyo my NFS Shift is like 55 - 60 fps but in gingerbread its just around 30 - 40 fps..
same on Quadrant in 3d rendering the red and blue dna like rolling figure is 49 - 50 fps in FROYO but in gingerbread it wont pass 30 fps
any tweaks on how to boost 3d rendering speed?
First of all, wrong section
Froyo indeed had better hardware acceleration than gb, and the kernel was also a lot better, Samsung rushed gb and messed things, but does it really affect you, the human eye can see @ ~30fps max, so does it matter?
honestly im seeing the difference.. 30fps is like lagging/stuttering to my naked eye..
i dont know but maybe its because I'm used to a high FPS on my computer.. the lowest FPS i see on my PC game is 90 fps. that's why I can differenciate 30fps to 60fps
cdesai said:
First of all, wrong section
Froyo indeed had better hardware acceleration than gb, and the kernel was also a lot better, Samsung rushed gb and messed things, but does it really affect you, the human eye can see @ ~30fps max, so does it matter?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people can really tell the difference. Sadly, I'm one of them
But I started using the tab as more of a work device than gaming, so the newer features of Gingerbread far outweighed the gaming performance of Froyo for me.
Karry025 said:
honestly im seeing the difference.. 30fps is like lagging/stuttering to my naked eye..
i dont know but maybe its because I'm used to a high FPS on my computer.. the lowest FPS i see on my PC game is 90 fps. that's why I can differenciate 30fps to 60fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
codewisp said:
Some people can really tell the difference. Sadly, I'm one of them
But I started using the tab as more of a work device than gaming, so the newer features of Gingerbread far outweighed the gaming performance of Froyo for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL i'm also one of them, and this was one of the reasons HC needed froyo bootloader!
actually in terms of UI rendering and office apps specially on loading.. Gingerbread beats froyo over a mile ahead.. gingerbread is smoother only the 3d gaming is the problem.. but very well going to stick on gingerbread 2.3.6..
and btw.. Froyo also allows to underclock the CPU with higher value than gingerbread.. on froyo I can run 1.4ghz with -350mv stable but on gingerbread I cant get past -50mv stable on 1.4ghz..
any other tweak on how are the others getting a monstrous 3K score on quadrant?
Karry025 said:
actually in terms of UI rendering and office apps specially on loading.. Gingerbread beats froyo over a mile ahead.. gingerbread is smoother only the 3d gaming is the problem.. but very well going to stick on gingerbread 2.3.6..
and btw.. Froyo also allows to underclock the CPU with higher value than gingerbread.. on froyo I can run 1.4ghz with -350mv stable but on gingerbread I cant get past -50mv stable on 1.4ghz..
any other tweak on how are the others getting a monstrous 3K score on quadrant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GB is faster than froyo, it would more, but Samsung rushed out the update, and that ruined it partially.
UV is kernel issue, try with some other kernel first, and -350mv is insane!
3k in quadrant is nothing, its just a score, can be fooled, mostly its fooled in I/O part
-350mv running stable on 1.4ghz is true..
have you tried a FROYO with any kuxodaxi's kernel?
i suggest you try it and see for yourself
yeah Gingerbread is faster in froyo but not on samsung..
on tab froyo beats gingerbread in terms of 3d gaming
by the way what is the best I/O scheduler for you?
Karry025 said:
-350mv running stable on 1.4ghz is true..
have you tried a FROYO with any kuxodaxi's kernel?
i suggest you try it and see for yourself
yeah Gingerbread is faster in froyo but not on samsung..
on tab froyo beats gingerbread in terms of 3d gaming
by the way what is the best I/O scheduler for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, no
I got my tab from my dad sometime back, and i had already updated to gb via *cough* kies *cough*, so didnt get a chance to try it out more.
i hope someone can port the UI speed of Gingerbread to the Froyo XD
Please adopt a little common sense when creating new threads.
Unless you have developed something, ROM/MOD/etc.. then the Development section is off limits for threads. Post it in General or Q&A.
You do not want to anger the XDA God of Tidiness
why do you have a common sense to spare? lol just kiddin
This thread is simply for people to display their benchmark scores instead of cluttering development threads,hopefully it'll be used for what its intended
Sent from my Xperia X10 using xda premium
Sent from my Xperia X10 using xda premium
FERALAB V21 - FeraKernel V3.6 GB Stock UB
UPDATE :
ROM and Kernel : Feralab V21 and Ferakernel V3.6 UB Stock GB.
CPU Freq : 998 MHz and 1190 MHz
FPS2D : 54 fps
Note :
Was posted on the original thread
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
FYI
Regards
my post moved from Developent
antutu score - 4329
fps2d - avg 44
kernel: FeraKernel 1.7 NV
ROM: scritch007 CMX10 v6
Clock: min: 245 max: 1190 performace deadline
transparency: 16bit
surface improvement: disable
sd card: standard 8GB - delivered with phone
XPERIA X10i Hardware
SDCard: SanDisk UHS-I 64GB (SanDisk Ultra Mobile Class6 4GB card used for benchmarks)
Battery: Mugen Power 1800mAh
DoomKernel v6 unlocked bootloader with GB v2.3.3 (My Daily)
Kernel: DoomKernel v6
ROM: X10S v9 GB 2.3.4 (95 system applications)
Add On: XPERIA S Apps
CPU: SetCPU 1113-1228MHz Governor: SmartAssv2/Performance i/o: sio
Optimisation: Link2SD with second partition.
3DMark: n/a Not available for X10i
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 3109 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v3.1.1: 3242 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v3.2.2: 3317 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v4.0.4: 4130 @ 1228MHz
NenaMark2: 8.4fps
FPS2D: 54 avg
iPerf: 22Mbits/s write to NAS over 802.11g
Quadrant: 1019
GeekBench2: 542
Battery: 5days where phone is left to idle and only very light use..
Epic Citadel: 11.2fps @854x480 on performance
Yes, it wouldn't really be playable on an XPERIA X10i but the benchmark does have it's uses given the graphics environment
and besides, it looks pretty while benchmarking even with the major lag/freezes... .
I would post a screenshot, but I use aScreenshot.apk and it gets swapped out to run Epic Citadel .
SDcard benchmark for a range of cards
Amin Kernel with CM10 v8.1(Scritch007)
3DMark: n/a coming soon
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 4550 [clock:1190MHz][Governorerformance][i/o:sio]
NenaMark2: 11fps
FPS2D: 43 avg...No Adreno 200 2D HW acceleration
Quadrant: 1044
GeekBench2: 448 clock:1128MHz raw CPU grunt doesn't seem to better OC'd GB 2.3.3 ????
Epic Citadel: 11fps ...lower frame rate but appears to run smoother.
Achotjan JB 4.1.2 Somc Debrand Engine Project
3DMark: 537
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 5840 [clock:1228MHz][Governorerformance][i/o:deadline]
NenaMark2: 11.2fps
FPS2D: 50 avg...Adreno 200 2D HW acceleration
Quadrant: 1005
GeekBench2: 386 clock:1128MHz raw CPU grunt doesn't seem to better OC'd GB 2.3.3 ????
Epic Citadel: n/a
FeraLab GB V21 + Bares V2 Add-on
FINALLY!!!
I get 3382 for 998MHz and 3574 for 1113MHz.
The problem?? Haha.... That's weird....
Please use Antutu Benchmark v3.0.3 instead the latest one!!!
So for those who can't get the score, PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE OP AND BARES'S POST!!!
DON'T FORGET THE ANTUTU BENCHMARK VERSION TOO!!
998MHz
1113MHz with RAM Manager [Balance (More Free RAM)]
This is my score after install everything into the phone
Last but not least, THANK YOU FERA AND BARES!!!
Απ: Benchmark Thread
V21 with Bares addon!
Στάλθηκε από το X10i μου
memory card score below average?
what type of sd card u all using? because mine is class 10 of 32gb but cant get score like u all get for sd card reading and writing only half of what u all get.
i only get 3049 antutu benchmark 3.0.3.
Scores don't really matter.i find youtube videos play better with 4.5 fera stock kernel.they dont lag or buffer.on 3.6 they do.that's om my phone.the 4.5 kernel does get a lower benchmark score but performs better watching videos and playing games
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
bodomfan said:
Scores don't really matter.i find youtube videos play better with 4.5 fera stock kernel.they dont lag or buffer.on 3.6 they do.that's om my phone.the 4.5 kernel does get a lower benchmark score but performs better watching videos and playing games
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I though this thread just for benchmark test result only (for all roms and kernels) , lol .
Also, i just read your post on Fera's thread, it seem. ....... ???
BTW, okay my friend, i will delete all those files, no problem I'm just try to share it.
also i dont want to messed the thread, and made confusing, sorry my bad .
@Antony & Prioxxx
Bro, above kernel and addon are Feravolt's work,
so. ... all credits goes to him.
I'm just re-pack it, so we can use Ferakernel V3.6 UB on Feralab V21 rom with the proper methode (at least for me).
Goodbye and, yeah have a nice day everybody
Best Regards
Keep 3.6 addon for ppl who prefer it
I just prefer 4.5 kernel
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
Hi!
It is normal to get 2769 in AnTuTu v3.0.3 with Feralab v21 UB without mods and 1.113 GHz?
The phone seems very fast and stable, but do not understand the result.
Thank you!
Greetings!
-=SrgiO=- said:
Hi!
It is normal to get 2769 in AnTuTu v3.0.3 with Feralab v21 UB without mods and 1.113 GHz?
The phone seems very fast and stable, but do not understand the result.
Thank you!
Greetings!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi bro, definitely this is normal.
But i have one question here :
Have you tried Ferakernel V3.6 UB before? , on any GB stock rom? such as Feralab V20?
Regards
CM7zmod3 DoomKernel v6 1113MHz ULBL
latest antutu
Sent from my X10 using xda app-developers app
Bares said:
Hi bro, definitely this is normal.
But i have one question here :
Have you tried Ferakernel V3.6 UB before? , on any GB stock rom? such as Feralab V20?
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello!
Then, I can breathe easy xD
Yes, I tried various combinations, both as DonutHD 2.3 UB and FeraLab v20 UB with Ferakernel 3.6. UB. Performance is excellent but a week of use, I began having reboots with FeraLab v20, did several wipes and factory resets but still the same. However are the best I've had (DonutHD and FLv20).
Now I'm testing the FeraLab v21 and now everything is very smooth and no reboots for now...
Thank you very much for your attention.
Greetings!
Rom : Feralab V21
Kernel : Ferakernel + Bares's Addon
AnTuTu v3.2.2
AnTuTu 3.2.2 is now available from Google Play store.
It appears to be adding a 'considerably' higher 3D and slightly higher 2D graphics score now. CPU Integer scores drop slightly.
Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10i benchmarks running DoomKernel v6 and GB 2.3.3
I have the same build for over 6 months with only minor build.prop 'tweaks' and the odd bit of memory freed after culling system apps down to 95, so I'm not thinking this is anything much different about my build, but I am seeing approx 208 points extra in the score since AnTuTu v3.0.3 and most of that is coming from 2D and 3D graphics scores.
Just to be all white coat, beard and thick rim glasses, I did re-install AnTuTu v3.0.3 again and re-test. The results are still consistent with old scores where we see higher CPU integer score and lower 2D and 3D graphics scores with AnTuTu v3.0.3
My old AnTuTu v3.0.3 score was 3109 and my current re-tested AnTuTu v3.0.3 score is 3101 - 3124 so any increase in AnTuTu scores is a reflection of AnTuTu's new version 3.2.2 and not any changes in your build.
So with the AnTuTu v3.2.2 scores we should all be seeing approx 200 points improvement on our AnTuTu v3.0.3 scores before we even consider any improvements attributed to developer changes.
Mind you if I was a ROM developer I'd be happy my ROM increased by 200 points in an AnTuTu benchmark over 3 months, even when I'd done nothing, but smiled and waved.
All a bit of a giggle, but it's nice to see the XPERIA X10i going up in AnTuTu scores with the same ROM/Kernel build rather than going down.
---------- Post added at 03:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 AM ----------
As a separate update with regards to benchmarking, I see Futuremark has listed 02-APR-2013 for Android.
Futuremark 3DMark for Android
[Update] I see that 3DMark is not supported on the XPERIA X10i, I tried side loading and just get an error.
Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang
whitefang3456 said:
Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry to side track a little bit, can you play candy crush on this rom? I tried, but no success in all mode.
whitefang3456 said:
Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omg! How did you get that high 3D score?
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
anguslaw said:
sorry to side track a little bit, can you play candy crush on this rom? I tried, but no success in all mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did able to play..did u messed up somehow?
View attachment 1853701
Whitefang
jai554 said:
Omg! How did you get that high 3D score?
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha ya should ask senior FeraVolt, I have no idea in theory yet hehe. Sorry XP
Whitefang
NEW TEST, benchmark+battery
Hi, its me again, i post new test, benchmark + battery. There is here no all kernels (i want test battery life time!) , but most popular. Tests are make on cyanogen ivendor 10, no clean system, with a lot of apps on background (like polish GG-messanger, skype, mail, pdoid patch for system etc).
Theoretical, on clean system, ivendor cyanogen 10, brood kernel OC, very clean system antutu benchmark shows 7092, but this is no normal use, i prefer benchmark and battery use on no-clean system, with all apps on background what i use normal (what i mentioned before).
[1]
Castagnal 10.2 kernel, smartAssV2, 1209mhz
Battery: 6/6
Antutu Benchmark: 5831
Problems for normal use: XBMC, HD vids dont play fluency, never reboot
[2]
Castagnal 10.2 kernel, smartAssV2, 1802mhz
Battery: 4/6
Antutu Benchmark: 6425
[3]
Nexus Kernel V8.0, OC, exUV, smartAssV2, 1824mhz
Battery: 2/6
Antutu Benchmark: 6264
[4]
Nexus Kernel V8.0, OC, exUV, smartAssV2, 1209mhz
Battery: 5/6
Antutu Benchmark: 5488
Problems for normal use: XBMC, HD vids dont play fluency; caller id for incoming calls shows in 1/2 s, not immedietly
[5]
Brood Kernel 1.4 - OC
Kernel BRICK MY PHONE, always on new cynogen
[6]
PhenomKernel by Erik v1.2.4 , smartAssV2, 1824mhz
Battery: 4/6
Antutu Benchmark: 6566
IMO, best fluency on XBMC (HD stream movies plays very fluency) and whole system, sometimes reboot
[7]
PhenomKernel by Erik v1.2.4 , smartAssV2, 1204mhz
Battery: 6/6
Antutu Benchmark: 5591
Problems for normal use: XBMC, HD vids dont play fluency;
MAIN RESULT: the best kernel for normal use is PhonomKernel, or Castagnal kernel. 1,2-1,4 Mhz on procesor, smartassV2. The better performance is for PhonemonKernel, but sometimes very rarely it reebot system. Normally i use phonemonKernel, cause i has significantly higher performance on normal use, and i could fast with widget overclock processor when i like see television by the XBMC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OLD test:
Hi, i would like to present my big-) test of kernels,
I use:
android 4.1.2, cynanogmod ivendor alpha 6 and a lot of diffrend kernels and make test twice,and take average value. Normal, no-clean system, with some apps on background, i i use normally
Kernel vendor frequency Antutu benchmark result increase
cynogen stock 1401 5780 0,0%
broodKernel v1.4 smartassV2 1401 5733 -0,8%
broodKernel v1.4 performance 1804 6710 16,1%
CastagnalT v10 Luizactive 1401 6325 9,4%
CastagnalT v10 performance 1804 6898 19,3% BEST RESULT
DiabloKernel HP+ 3.0 BrazilianWax 1401 5351 -7,4%
DiabloKernel HP+ 3.0 performance 1824 6747 16,7%
Re: My big Kernel benchmark on i9001, 4.1.2, cynanogmod ivendor alpha 6
Nice test!
I would be interested in the battery drains as well. A fast phone is nice but if it couldn't last a day on battery it's not an option.
Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9001
I have battery some for some kernels..
brood kernel, 1800, smartass 2, battery work time is the same as stock cyanogen kernel, works good. brood kernel make sometimes phone reboot.
castagnal.kernel is very battery drain. and camera don't work good on my phone on it. vendor luizactive
Diablo kernel I don't test more than some hours... and can't say something serious about battery work time.
Re: My big Kernel benchmark on i9001, 4.1.2, cynanogmod ivendor alpha 6
Nice test out there!
However can you update your thread with new kernels like Diablo's kernel or Nexus?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium
AriSLaSH said:
Nice test out there!
However can you update your thread with new kernels like Diablo's kernel or Nexus?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i will make new test, battery time work, * benchmark, all kernels from xda, new ivendor rom, non+clean system with apps i use (pdroid, gg-messangfer etc)
if u want
+1 for the battery tests; for me if a kernel runs like the wind but drains my battery in hours, there is no much point.
New test, plz comment, not all kernels, because i want test battery performance very good
upgraded test
Hi
Currently I'm using Erikmod 3.0 kernel with 1824 MHz OC. I suggest this kernel for the benchmark.
Thank you*Thank you*Thank you....
KEEP THIS AWESOME WORK MAAAN!
THIS. IS. [email protected]#$ ING GREAT!!!!!
Device model:SGS+ (i9001)
Recovery:TWRP 2.4.1.0
baseband version:XXXPF
Current ROM:CM10 by ivendor beta 1
Best ROMs ever:
1.GB: GingerRevenge by hiej
2.ICS: CM9 by arco68 RC4
3.JB: ivendor CM10 beta 1
Thanks for this awesome Tests you've made.
I'm using EhndroixII with NexusV8 Kernel. Batterylife is great.
Thank you very much for fantastic benchmarks. I haven't actually tried PhenomKerne, but seems to be the best hands down. I wonder if it would work on my Japanese SC-02B...
speedwayfan75 said:
Thanks for this awesome Tests you've made.
I'm using EhndroixII with NexusV8 Kernel. Batterylife is great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try use PhonemKernel, it has better battery work time or castagnal 10.2
dromaczek said:
Try use PhonemKernel, it has better battery work time or castagnal 10.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you,i will try both kernels. Can i flash both in TWRP or do in need Odin?
no odin, i use recorwery mode, clockwork