Simple.
Im currently using GingerDx v23 still..the PrimeHD seems awesome.
Can someone tell their experiences with these roms?
Which is faster? More smoother.
On stock kernel without oc or with some oc like 614mhz or similar!
I really dont want any kernel results or big OC-ing.
We know that these methods improve our phone speed!
Dude..sorry for saying this but you must not compare one ROM with other ROM since different user might having different experiences..if you are so currious with their experience, why don't you read the thread where the user express their experience..and why don't you try the ROM you want to compare with so you know the differences..
No heart feeling dude..
Cheers..:beer:
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
A fine gentleman you must be.
Still your right.
But the feedback is positive mostly.
Ginger had some battery issues,but thats fixed.
Also Im thinkin that somebody tried them both,so he could just say what he thinks.
Also gonna run the benchmark later. Post pics here with Ginger Dx then try the PrimeHD and compare the results.
had run both of them personal statement "the most stable and fast rom primeHD"
Sent from my E15i using XDA
I endorse
Sent from my X8 using XDA
Medo2 said:
Simple.
Im currently using GingerDx v23 still..the PrimeHD seems awesome.
Can someone tell their experiences with these roms?
Which is faster? More smoother.
On stock kernel without oc or with some oc like 614mhz or similar!
I really dont want any kernel results or big OC-ing.
We know that these methods improve our phone speed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both the ROMs are awesome. For people who cannot unlock their bootloader GingerDX is good, and for others who can PrimeHD is awesome, light, fast and awesome battery back up.... I have used GIngerDX v24 with Alfs v8 ICS kernel and currently using PrimeHD with nAa 11 Kernel...my vote is for Prime HD.....Hope this helps.
gingerdx is very awesome, but battery drain fast, i suggest prime hd for better battery life
GingerDx V024 is awesome for my stock kernel with NO OC.
However, PrimeHD has no battery drain unlike GDx, as I experienced it.
Personally, i found PRIMEHD to be better in terms of battery and light weight. It has a few non-relevant bugs (doesn't matter since they are hardly used)
But again, GDx has none... So both are good in their spheres
For my stock kernel and no OC, I use Prime HD
However, I recommend you to try both ROMS.
Just recently flashed PrimeHD last week and i think this is an amazing ROM... very smooth and fast plus good battery life for stock kernel...
Test
I made some tests with antutu on fresh installed GDX and PHD (without sd card,no OC):
GDX
First run: 1432 / 90 / 193 / 150 / 400 / 469 / 130
Second run: 1460 / 95 / 196 / 145 / 410 / 474 / 140
Third run: 1472 / 95 / 194 / 150 / 407 / 471 / 155
PHD
First run: 1481 /114/ 201 / 150 / 404 / 482 / 130
Second run: 1495 /115/ 199 / 151 / 411 / 474 / 145
Third run: 1505 /114/ 201 / 151 / 408 / 476 / 155
I think primehd because its fast,smooth & best of all more free ram...
But gdx is recomended too for daily rom & as far as i remember,they will release also gdx with some ics(correct me if im wrong)...I dont know what it is but its cool...
GingerDX is in my point of view better than PrimeHD. It is much faster
Sent from my X8 using xda premium
I had Prime HD on stock kernel installed few apparently and it was very very slow and lag, now I use GingerDX v24 and it is much much better
Sent from my X8 using XDA
tonin_haggard said:
I had Prime HD on stock kernel installed few apparently and it was very very slow and lag, now I use GingerDX v24 and it is much much better
Sent from my X8 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used both of the roms for stock kernel and i have to say that both are great but I find primehd smoother and faster and also better for gaming . So my vote is for primehd!
Sent from my X8 using xda premium
lokibg said:
I made some tests with antutu on fresh installed GDX and PHD (without sd card,no OC):
GDX
First run: 1432 / 90 / 193 / 150 / 400 / 469 / 130
Second run: 1460 / 95 / 196 / 145 / 410 / 474 / 140
Third run: 1472 / 95 / 194 / 150 / 407 / 471 / 155
PHD
First run: 1481 /114/ 201 / 150 / 404 / 482 / 130
Second run: 1495 /115/ 199 / 151 / 411 / 474 / 145
Third run: 1505 /114/ 201 / 151 / 408 / 476 / 155
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And here you have the reason why you shouldn't take AnTuTu or any of the other synthetic benchmarks around overly serious. Looking at the first figure (CPU score) the result varies way too greatly with each run.
Anyway, while it's nice to see a few figures the greater sense of these comparison threads really escape me. Taking the drift rate of AnTuTu into consideration the averaged score is about the same and below any noticeable threshold (leaving the SD out of the equation as the difference between different X8's is simply too high due to the many classes of SDs).
As for ROMs that are actually DEVELOPED (and not some lousy apkedits by some wannabes) - I think everyone of us has a specific user-base, and having a selection of different ROMs is actually a good thing (keep in mind I still talk about ROMs that are actually developed and built from source).
HAKA does a excellent job and the same applies to nAa and his miniCM7|9 ROMs.
The question shouldn't be "<ROM> Vs. <ROM>" but rather "what do you like in the ROM you use most?"
Just my two cents.
just test
I was just curious and decided to make this experiment. In fact Im using GDX and I love it
Well you see these two roms are quite similar.
Both of them get updated and both of them got similar functions!
PrimeHD has all of GingerDx options..
pozdrav
i have used both of them and i get better antutu score with prime hd v6
it is kind`a smoother and i like it more for 2d and 3d performance,2d-410 3d-480
I get a much better battery life using PrimeHD than I ever did with GingerDX. Sometimes double... My record is over 3 days on one charge.
Although I have noticed something puzzling... I added 500MB of data to my phone 6 days ago and now I only have 150MB remaining and in that time I've only used it for SMS and a couple of calls, no internet usage. Is it possible that just syncing with my google account is using that much data?
I guess ginger dx is better. but in V024 i couldnt flash CWM zips ........... and i dunno why? Ginger dx wins Prime HD hands down .. I hav got lots of RAM issues with Prime HD as i run out of memory most of the time.... In my experience GDX wins I hope @B.Jay could give me a solution for the problem i have.......
Related
Plz report your benchmark results for comparasion...
score from my floyo v0.20 from racht:
using Quadrant 1150 with 748MHz
anyone know how to improve to get more? for me reboots if I set more than 748MHz :S
I once got 1323 with racht's floyo v20, 768MHz...
This has no place in DEV section ! Post in general.
I got 1026 in MiniCM with standard 600mMHz
I got 1113 with racht's floyo 0.20 without overclocking
anyone know how to improve ROM's to be stable for highter processor's frequency?
Crashes when set it more than 748MHz
Does anyone work at higher frequencies?
Max frequency depends on processor and every processor is different. One can run on higher frequencies without problems but other can't. For example: I can overclock max to 710 Mhz but you can overclock to 748 Mhz
quadrant 1132 floyo 0.20 [email protected]
floyo v0.20 from racht: 1081
Racht's floyo 0.20 - 600 MHz
About 1050
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App
MiniCM - 1430 (825 MHz)!
froyobread v004 no oc.
:1079
update: after switching to doixanh FroyoBread, I got 1114.
CPU Scores 3612.
Got floyo 0.20 , most system apps removed, max available ram 109 mb , no oc, max score 1100
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App
Nice scores
Is anyone try benchmark with new HACKDROID CM7 2.3.4 gaming rom realise?
1050...but i will try again with less apps
Total : 1175
CPU : 4038
Memory : 884
I/O : 347
2D : 265
3D : 383
Floyo 0.20
Overclock : 748mhz
some apps installed : advanced task killer , android booster , astro file manager , barcode reader , double twist , engadget , GPS speedo , just pictures , maverick , kreac Calculator , MultiTasking Pro , note Everything , opera Mini , Vplayer , SetCPU and smart keyboard
plus preinstalled apps in floyo
but before running quadrant i cleaned up memory with advanced task killer so i don't know if those apps was affecting the result or not
floyo .20 quadrant --> 1050
miniCM overclock 800+ --> quadrant bigger than moto droid x
but uselles because i dont like gameloft game, i more like strategy game like grave defense, majesty kingdom, etc.
FroyoBread with 825 Mhz - 1415 (first place!)
Why i don't get reboots on 825?
I got 1067 points in Quadrant GingerFroyo v1.4.16 ROM with no overclocking.
Up to how many can I overclock my MHz X8 without problems?
Greetings from Brazil!
Hi all. I just wanna share my research about two gingerbread firmwares: KPN and KPH. Everybody says KPN much more stable, no SODs, smooth, and etc. and KPH not stable enough, and have much SODs. but how about the benchmark result?
Sorry, I was forget to take a screenshot of the benchmark results.
First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Second: KPH (2.3.4)
Score: 1000 - 1500 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 1600 - 1900 (with CF-Root)
Wow, it's shocking. Even it has random SOD issue (stock or cf-root) but the performance is great. Angry birds, lags there are only small lags. On the benchmark reading & writing database it's really fast, graphic test fps almost same as KPN. And I think it has better battery, depends on the ussage.
Conclusion
In my opinion, KPN is stable enough but slow. And KPH is fair, the performance was great. About my ROM, fla.sh it's ready for packaging. But now, I will start over again and use KPH as base. How about you?
What was it about 2.3.4 showing up anomalous results on quadrant? Rumour or fact?
Edit: just ran quadrant on 2.3.3 kpn 1500+
Anyways kpn has a shorter wake time but slightly longer time for screen off.
consegregate said:
What was it about 2.3.4 showing up anomalous results on quadrant? Rumour or fact?
Edit: just ran quadrant on 2.3.3 kpn 1500+
Anyways kpn has a shorter wake time but slightly longer time for screen off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow.. CF-Root? MicroSD high class? I just flash KPN and ran bencmark with result 500 -600. KPH will show high result (and getting higher after you run benchmark again).
Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
chinoyray said:
Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? But how about performance? I think KPH is better.
fla.sh said:
Wow.. CF-Root? MicroSD high class? I just flash KPN and ran bencmark with result 500 -600. KPH will show high result (and getting higher after you run benchmark again).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On ext4 with both KPN/KPH gives me benchmarks of around 1500, no difference.
Playing games, no difference.
So it comes to stability plus bln support
chinoyray said:
Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree for this. Benchmark on KPH just to good to be true.
From my experience, KPN is better than KPH, KPN more smooth than KPH. But i don't try it on game. IMHO, the real benchmark is game.
First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use KPN, and the results of my benchmark 1600 + +, and has not happened SOD. ...
KPN play game more better than KPH
sorry my bad english. .
my KPN benchmark is 1734. with cfroot of course. when i installed gingerreal RC1 (KPN as base), my benchmark became 1819. everything is so smooth. except for the android keyboard which is btw still bugged with gingerreal. but it doesn't matter since gingerbread keyboardis so much better. so legit. )
Wow! Thoose values are greater than expected... Now I'm packaging my ROM
Waiting for fla.sh's package now....
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
fla.sh said:
Hi all. I just wanna share my research about two gingerbread firmwares: KPN and KPH. Everybody says KPN much more stable, no SODs, smooth, and etc. and KPH not stable enough, and have much SODs. but how about the benchmark result?
Sorry, I was forget to take a screenshot of the benchmark results.
First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey fla.sh,
my Quadrant standard benchmark results for stock KPN and only a few tweaks in build.prop are 1000-1200 everytime. And for me KPN looks better then KPH, althoug i didn't try KPH for a long time now.
What about CF-root for KPN and SOD's? Are you sure? You know whats the problem with it exactly? I'm testing this to and i must say that i didn't have SOD'S for a week now being on only stock KPN.
Cheers.
fla.sh said:
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never had SOD with cf-root and KPN. i don't know about the battery drain since even with KPH, my battery drains fast.
quadrant scores are clearly not reliable. i am better off with kpn as it does not have sod problem.
Scores
There is a great difference in the scores.
But I'm just happy using KPH.
1jesper1 said:
There is a great difference in the scores.
But I'm just happy using KPH.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't revive dead topics
Sent from my MSM7227 with Adreno 200 using XDA App
EmoBoiix3 said:
Please don't revive dead topics
Sent from my MSM7227 with Adreno 200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This tread just contains interesting information I had never seen before.
This goes about 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 firmware, so it's recent.
edit: Nevermind.. I wasn't aware that this is an old topic.
Sorry guys but why you use quadrant ? If you try other app like Antutu or SmarthBench i think that it willi be better. In my case the results on Smarthbench are:
498 / 982 tweak enabled; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
479 / 986 Tweak disabled; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
501 / 960 Tweak disabled; V6 supercharged enabled belaced 3; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
503 / 929 Tweak disabled; V6 supercharged enabled belaced 3; 97loopy_smoothness; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
On antutu bench i have: 1797
I know that they aren't stock firm but the base is the same....
I've owned an Xperia Arc for 6 months now and have made several modifications to it and on the whole I am very happy with phone.
Here is my spec:
Sony Xperia Arc
Arconium 6.1
Doom Kernel v18
Baseband .36 with libs
CPU Min/Max 134/1.4mhz
Governed: ondemandv2
Scheduler: bfq
This is an excellent setup and I recommend it highly
Well done to the very talented developers we are blessed to have.
Please share your Experience and any modifications you have undertaken.
Arconium 6.1, DooMKernel V18-FIX, Basebans .64, interactiveX, deadline, 134-1401Mhz
I like it
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
I am noticing a trend here.
I have tried both CM and Blend Miui, but I am finally happy on the following set up:
Arconium 6.1
DooMKernel v18
Baseband 36
CPU 134/1401
smartass v2
I/O bfq
In a word: superslick!
And, I think the reason so many people like stock is that SE make a pretty damn good rom that looks sweet with the bravia engine and is very functional with great widgets. As much as I love cyanogenmod, stock is just too good to switch...yet...let's wait and see for a stable cm9!
Arconium 6.1, Doomkernel v18.1, Smartass V2, apart from undervolted -100 haven't messed around with clocks and I/O. Oh yea V6 supercharged Sewell. Lag free + go launcher ex for some nice transitions and themes
Sent from my LT18i using Tapatalk
Ditto, arconium 6.1, doomkernel 17, .62 bb, o/c @ 1.6, brazilianwax & noop, linux swap, juwe11s ram manager without lock home, link2sd with a 16gb class 10. I'm very happy :-D
sinkster©
Stock ROM .42 - as my bootloader is locked :-(
But... Baseband 36 with Iridakis corrections
V6 script too
Sent from my LT15i using Tapatalk
Guys, is bfq the best I/O scheduler as you all use bfq?
In Antutu there's no difference between deadline and bfq.
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
Guys, is bfq the best I/O scheduler as you all use bfq?
In Antutu there's no difference between deadline and bfq.
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find BFQ the best although it is said that the more simpler NOOP is actually the better one. Its your personal preference
Global Generic
World-1-8_4.02. A.0.62
CyanogenMod 7.2.0-RC0 104
Baseband-56
Xperia Arc S
CM7-FXP105
Baseband .36 (incl. libs)
Governor: interactive
I/O scheduler: bfq
CPU: 122 MHz / 1401 MHz (no OC)
UV @ -75 mV
V6 Supercharger
Sick Speed tweaks
Link2SD 2GB (32GB Class 10)
Your all using class 10 sd cards with link2sd, does a lower class make a difference?
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App
samuel109 said:
Your all using class 10 sd cards with link2sd, does a lower class make a difference?
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use Link2SD with a class 2 SD card and never ever had any issues or lag.
iR¡[email protected]!* via Tapatalk
samuel109 said:
Your all using class 10 sd cards with link2sd, does a lower class make a difference?
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think so.
kaatisu84 said:
I am noticing a trend here.
I have tried both CM and Blend Miui, but I am finally happy on the following set up:
Arconium 6.1
DooMKernel v18
Baseband 36
CPU 134/1401
smartass v2
I/O bfq
In a word: superslick!
And, I think the reason so many people like stock is that SE make a pretty damn good rom that looks sweet with the bravia engine and is very functional with great widgets. As much as I love cyanogenmod, stock is just too good to switch...yet...let's wait and see for a stable cm9!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, the stock based roms are much better, without causing offence to any developers as they do an extraordinary job, but their work is done alongside regular jobs in most cases. Whereas SE pay people to do a job.
Hats off to all developers though who dedicate so much time an effort into these projects.
I love my arc, even more so that I'm able to install custom roms and kernels.
Acornium 6.1
Doomkernel 18 fix 1
Baseband -36
Lt81i
When I first got my arc after 3 weeks of waiting for it to get in I loved it. then it seemed a bit laggy times but still loved it. Now it's all pimped out and awesome.
Next phone - xperia s!
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium
Best setting so far:
LT18i
Arconium 6.1
Doomkernel v18
CPU 245/1601 Mhz
Undervolting -75mV
Gov. Ondemand
I/O deadline
~ 2% battery drain/hour on idle with data on..awesome
I really want an Arc or Arc S. Trying to trade my Atrix 4G for it. Phone is damn sexy and I've always loved Sony Ericsson (Sony) smartphone products.
I envy you guys atm =)
Sent via White Nexus S
Arc is so pretty that sometimes I can't even look at other peoples' phones!
My settings :
LT15i
Xperia-Mod 4.0
Doomkernel v18Fix1
CPU : 245/1200 Mhz
Governor : SmartassV2
I/O : Deadline
V6 Supercharger
Just Niice
Hi everyone I am currently running the NXT LE rom v1.3. I have tried various other roms but I find that this is the best one so far. Can you guys compare various roms and see which is better for gaming and performance, Jelly Bean (with new adreno drivers) or Gingerbread. Thanks
Every one list:
Kernel
Rom
Take Antutu Benchmark of your rom
from my experience, gingerbread is still the best android version for the xperia play
NXT LE with gin2jb theme,
Latest doomlord gb kernel
At 1017 Mhz
Score: 4288
Thinks too that a modified gingerbread is still the best choice for my Play. I saw that some guys got a bit higher Benchmark score on JellyBean but that doesn't mean that it is better for gaming. I really wish that more devs would pay more attention to GB.
Doomkernel v.14
DiXperia2
Antutu B. 6161 @ 1.8 Ghz.
Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post
SICKNOSIS said:
Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already tried some ics/jb roms but the performance wasnt that what i was looking for, id stick with gb
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Antutu
--1Ghz
Total : 5005
2D : 522
3D : 1950
--1.8Ghz (to align with above post clock)
Total : 6330
2D : 538
3D : 1959
I have a locked bootloader so no fancy kernels or overclocking, but I'm sure it could serve as a base to compare performance.
Nenamark 2 [GB]
First run: 14.0 fps
Second run: 13.6 fps
Third run: 14.0 fps
Fourth run: 14.2 fps
Fifth run: 14.1 fps
ROM: Xperia NXT Light Edition by Kris Dee v.1.3
Newest Adreno drivers for ICS/JB makes a huge difference albeit the RAM consumption is higher.
jcarbox said:
Newest Adreno drivers for ICS/JB makes a huge difference albeit the RAM consumption is higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was actually reported lower many times.
sewer56lol said:
It was actually reported lower many times.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparation nenamark2 score between default and update adreno driver on xperia neo l ics rom on my play, on default driver about 26 fps but on update driver about 31 fps.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Kernel: DooMKerneL
Unlocked Bootloader
Running at 1ghz on performance governor
Running Supercharger script too
Here's mine.
[GB]
1st run : 13.2 fps
2nd run : 13.4 fps
3rd run : 13.0 fps
4th run : 13.3 fps
5th run : 13.2 fps
ROM: Xperia NXT Light Edition by Kris Dee v.1.3
jabberwocky_one said:
Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW!!!! Your scores are much higher than mine and "aitmanga"'s scores. So I guess JB is much better for gaming, right?
Now I'm quite skeptical about that methodology. x2 more fps? I don't think so.
Anyone have any other idea on test methods? Antutu and quadrant scores aren't really useful unless you state the graphics score breakdown.
Edit: updated previous post with antutu for what it's worth.
I installed the SlimBean rom and tried Gta 3, it is no where as smooth as the nxt light rom ive been using, but the benchmark is like 29!!! Which is more than double my score on nxt light, but in real life performance JB is not as good as GB!! Even though the benchmarks show that it is
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Well, some games are bottlenecked by the GPU and others by the CPU. There's no general rule like 'if one game doubles its framerate, every game should be the same' so GTA3 can be CPU limited.
Probably Nenamark is very GPU intensive and a optimized GPU driver can do wonders but each game has its own CPU-GPU balance.
jabberwocky_one said:
Come now, let's not keep talking about 'I think that, I think this'.
Let's start showing from numbers from Nenamark 2, since it's purely gaming you guys want. When you're done, just delete/wtv.
Let us start with a few ground rules:
1.0GHz Performance governer ONLY.
I/O schedule = whatever since it shouldn't matter much.
State whether you're using GB/JB.
Here's mine.
[JB]
1st run : 30.7 fps
2nd run : 31.4 fps
3rd run : 31.4 fps
4th run : 31.8 fps
5th run : 31.5 fps
ROM: SlimBean by cj360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, scores are almost same as on my setup.
Kernel is turbo jb from cosmicdan
Rom - pac from wedgess
1ghz performance
31.4 fps
1,6 performance
33,4 fps
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
ROM : NXT 1.3 LE
Kernel : Doomkernel v14
Antutu benchmark : [email protected],2ghz
Not too bad..
Sent from my R800i
4.0.2.A.0.58 Enhanced V2
Kernel : Doomkernel v14
Antutu v3.0.3 benchmark : [email protected] performance (normally set [email protected] ondemand)
not too bad even playing zombiewood smoothly, as long as you got enough free ram & set VM Heap size to 96m-128m
Devastator004
SICKNOSIS said:
Um........good point. But people are saying that with the new Adreno drivers that ICS and JB for gaming are better than GB. I only use my xperia play for gaming, so I have been looking for a rom designed for gaming, so far the best is NXT Light in my opinion. If anyone finds other please post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would have agreed wih u and up unill i came across jb slim I thought that nxt light was the best jb slim bean it the only rom which is really come near to perfection the only downfall is that u cannot record but u can use the camera to take pictures via app from play store for free. and all the other features work to perfection u can overclock to 1.6ghz to play certain games which are too slow to play 4 exmple modern combact 4. also u can download games from google play store for free which arent even supose to be working on xperia play like shadow gun dead zone and all this is not even he best part when u flash it normally u get atleast 550mb internall free well thats becasue how small the actual rom it self is also this is the least laggyiest rom plus if u like to listen to music then it has apollo music player bonus points so despite the loss of the recording feature it overall makes up in compare to every other feature. :good: if u are inerested i personally tested it on xperia play r800i alos thishas been tested on r800x the link to this is if u are intersed that is :laugh::fingers-crossed::highfive:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=35493383
for gaming i recomend - Jellyzeus (JB) or CM9.1 (ICS) - both can run GTA VC really smoth on low settings (25%distance / 50%textures, all other low or off) ...
if you buy xperia play for hard gaming, i recomend - NXT Light Ed. - its best...
but if you play games like wheres my water / angry birds, and want JB, its a good choice...
NEW TEST, benchmark+battery
Hi, its me again, i post new test, benchmark + battery. There is here no all kernels (i want test battery life time!) , but most popular. Tests are make on cyanogen ivendor 10, no clean system, with a lot of apps on background (like polish GG-messanger, skype, mail, pdoid patch for system etc).
Theoretical, on clean system, ivendor cyanogen 10, brood kernel OC, very clean system antutu benchmark shows 7092, but this is no normal use, i prefer benchmark and battery use on no-clean system, with all apps on background what i use normal (what i mentioned before).
[1]
Castagnal 10.2 kernel, smartAssV2, 1209mhz
Battery: 6/6
Antutu Benchmark: 5831
Problems for normal use: XBMC, HD vids dont play fluency, never reboot
[2]
Castagnal 10.2 kernel, smartAssV2, 1802mhz
Battery: 4/6
Antutu Benchmark: 6425
[3]
Nexus Kernel V8.0, OC, exUV, smartAssV2, 1824mhz
Battery: 2/6
Antutu Benchmark: 6264
[4]
Nexus Kernel V8.0, OC, exUV, smartAssV2, 1209mhz
Battery: 5/6
Antutu Benchmark: 5488
Problems for normal use: XBMC, HD vids dont play fluency; caller id for incoming calls shows in 1/2 s, not immedietly
[5]
Brood Kernel 1.4 - OC
Kernel BRICK MY PHONE, always on new cynogen
[6]
PhenomKernel by Erik v1.2.4 , smartAssV2, 1824mhz
Battery: 4/6
Antutu Benchmark: 6566
IMO, best fluency on XBMC (HD stream movies plays very fluency) and whole system, sometimes reboot
[7]
PhenomKernel by Erik v1.2.4 , smartAssV2, 1204mhz
Battery: 6/6
Antutu Benchmark: 5591
Problems for normal use: XBMC, HD vids dont play fluency;
MAIN RESULT: the best kernel for normal use is PhonomKernel, or Castagnal kernel. 1,2-1,4 Mhz on procesor, smartassV2. The better performance is for PhonemonKernel, but sometimes very rarely it reebot system. Normally i use phonemonKernel, cause i has significantly higher performance on normal use, and i could fast with widget overclock processor when i like see television by the XBMC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OLD test:
Hi, i would like to present my big-) test of kernels,
I use:
android 4.1.2, cynanogmod ivendor alpha 6 and a lot of diffrend kernels and make test twice,and take average value. Normal, no-clean system, with some apps on background, i i use normally
Kernel vendor frequency Antutu benchmark result increase
cynogen stock 1401 5780 0,0%
broodKernel v1.4 smartassV2 1401 5733 -0,8%
broodKernel v1.4 performance 1804 6710 16,1%
CastagnalT v10 Luizactive 1401 6325 9,4%
CastagnalT v10 performance 1804 6898 19,3% BEST RESULT
DiabloKernel HP+ 3.0 BrazilianWax 1401 5351 -7,4%
DiabloKernel HP+ 3.0 performance 1824 6747 16,7%
Re: My big Kernel benchmark on i9001, 4.1.2, cynanogmod ivendor alpha 6
Nice test!
I would be interested in the battery drains as well. A fast phone is nice but if it couldn't last a day on battery it's not an option.
Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9001
I have battery some for some kernels..
brood kernel, 1800, smartass 2, battery work time is the same as stock cyanogen kernel, works good. brood kernel make sometimes phone reboot.
castagnal.kernel is very battery drain. and camera don't work good on my phone on it. vendor luizactive
Diablo kernel I don't test more than some hours... and can't say something serious about battery work time.
Re: My big Kernel benchmark on i9001, 4.1.2, cynanogmod ivendor alpha 6
Nice test out there!
However can you update your thread with new kernels like Diablo's kernel or Nexus?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium
AriSLaSH said:
Nice test out there!
However can you update your thread with new kernels like Diablo's kernel or Nexus?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i will make new test, battery time work, * benchmark, all kernels from xda, new ivendor rom, non+clean system with apps i use (pdroid, gg-messangfer etc)
if u want
+1 for the battery tests; for me if a kernel runs like the wind but drains my battery in hours, there is no much point.
New test, plz comment, not all kernels, because i want test battery performance very good
upgraded test
Hi
Currently I'm using Erikmod 3.0 kernel with 1824 MHz OC. I suggest this kernel for the benchmark.
Thank you*Thank you*Thank you....
KEEP THIS AWESOME WORK MAAAN!
THIS. IS. [email protected]#$ ING GREAT!!!!!
Device model:SGS+ (i9001)
Recovery:TWRP 2.4.1.0
baseband version:XXXPF
Current ROM:CM10 by ivendor beta 1
Best ROMs ever:
1.GB: GingerRevenge by hiej
2.ICS: CM9 by arco68 RC4
3.JB: ivendor CM10 beta 1
Thanks for this awesome Tests you've made.
I'm using EhndroixII with NexusV8 Kernel. Batterylife is great.
Thank you very much for fantastic benchmarks. I haven't actually tried PhenomKerne, but seems to be the best hands down. I wonder if it would work on my Japanese SC-02B...
speedwayfan75 said:
Thanks for this awesome Tests you've made.
I'm using EhndroixII with NexusV8 Kernel. Batterylife is great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try use PhonemKernel, it has better battery work time or castagnal 10.2
dromaczek said:
Try use PhonemKernel, it has better battery work time or castagnal 10.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you,i will try both kernels. Can i flash both in TWRP or do in need Odin?
no odin, i use recorwery mode, clockwork