Database Users

Benchmark scores

Plz report your benchmark results for comparasion...
score from my floyo v0.20 from racht:
using Quadrant 1150 with 748MHz
anyone know how to improve to get more? for me reboots if I set more than 748MHz :S

I once got 1323 with racht's floyo v20, 768MHz...

This has no place in DEV section ! Post in general.

I got 1026 in MiniCM with standard 600mMHz

I got 1113 with racht's floyo 0.20 without overclocking

anyone know how to improve ROM's to be stable for highter processor's frequency?
Crashes when set it more than 748MHz
Does anyone work at higher frequencies?

Max frequency depends on processor and every processor is different. One can run on higher frequencies without problems but other can't. For example: I can overclock max to 710 Mhz but you can overclock to 748 Mhz

quadrant 1132 floyo 0.20 [email protected]

floyo v0.20 from racht: 1081

Racht's floyo 0.20 - 600 MHz
About 1050
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App

MiniCM - 1430 (825 MHz)!

froyobread v004 no oc.
:1079

update: after switching to doixanh FroyoBread, I got 1114.
CPU Scores 3612.

Got floyo 0.20 , most system apps removed, max available ram 109 mb , no oc, max score 1100
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App

Nice scores
Is anyone try benchmark with new HACKDROID CM7 2.3.4 gaming rom realise?

1050...but i will try again with less apps

Total : 1175
CPU : 4038
Memory : 884
I/O : 347
2D : 265
3D : 383
Floyo 0.20
Overclock : 748mhz
some apps installed : advanced task killer , android booster , astro file manager , barcode reader , double twist , engadget , GPS speedo , just pictures , maverick , kreac Calculator , MultiTasking Pro , note Everything , opera Mini , Vplayer , SetCPU and smart keyboard
plus preinstalled apps in floyo
but before running quadrant i cleaned up memory with advanced task killer so i don't know if those apps was affecting the result or not

floyo .20 quadrant --> 1050
miniCM overclock 800+ --> quadrant bigger than moto droid x
but uselles because i dont like gameloft game, i more like strategy game like grave defense, majesty kingdom, etc.

FroyoBread with 825 Mhz - 1415 (first place!)
Why i don't get reboots on 825?

I got 1067 points in Quadrant GingerFroyo v1.4.16 ROM with no overclocking.
Up to how many can I overclock my MHz X8 without problems?
Greetings from Brazil!

A New Benchmark App!

A new benchmark app is out that promises
results that cannot be faked like some other apps.
It also gives you more relevant information like browser performance etc.
It works on HC although it switches to portrait automatically.
Check it out, what do you think of it? Post your test results and rom version here on this thread.
The name on market is Vellamo.
Results included, overall result 1174 - rom info in signature at bottom... LOL my galaxy rom hammered the actual galaxy 10.1 although she is clocked at 1.4
Enjoy
MJ-12

Can you try without OC, just to be fair
954 with my stock 4.010.40, stock kernel, stock rom, rooted, some extra apps

1060 on 1.2 OC, galaxy virtuous
Wysłane z Acera A500 przy pomocy swype

1171 With Honneyvillain 1.04 + OC kernel @ 1.5 Ghz

1213
Virtuous Thrive @ 1.6GHz UNITY V8

m-deejay said:
1213
Virtuous Thrive @ 1.6GHz UNITY V8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your virtuous galaxy @ 1.6 1253
MJ-12

1094 With Honneyvillain 1.04 + thor`s villain OC kernel @ 1.5 GHz

1182
Clean wipe, HoneyVillain 1.04 + villain_iconia_kernel_1.1 @ 1.5 GHz

1213 with stock 3.1 + Thor 1.1b6. CPU @ 1.6ghz.

971 on rooted stock 3.1 (4.010.11).

cq842000 said:
1213 with stock 3.1 + Thor 1.1b6. CPU @ 1.6ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not too shabby with stock, but so far cant see anything better than virtuous galaxy...
MJ-12

My Iconia gets 986 with stock rom 4.010.22

the result does not really matter since some parameters have to be taken.
so let's compare like this
* from 100%, maximum light, maximum sound, wifi close (to avoid any kind of mail notification or else), during 30 minutes playing a game like let say "NFS and everybody's golf"
how much battery you left ?
then let say we can do some kind of math rules to be more FAIR
how compare score, with so difference in term of OC.
guys try to be fair, see the score between stocks, between roms, between oc, between kernel.
run also 3 or 5 test and make an average score
but do not forget the battery, nothing matter more than the lifespan hehehe

stock acer iconia 3.1 @ 1ghz = 950

Score: 1139
Cpu: 1408mhz
Stock plus custom kernel V1.3 20-05 Richard.
Cheers!

1080
Virtuous Xoom v.1.1.2 @ 1.5 GHz

1232
HoneyVillain 1.04 + villain_iconia_kernel_1.1
SetCPU: scaling = Interactive @ 216000-1504000
Changed since previous benchmark:
CPU Master to SetCPU
On demand to Interactive
Min. clock freq. back to 216 MHz (was 312 MHz)

1242
LightSpeed 1.01 + villain_iconia_kernel_2.5
SetCPU: scaling = Ondemand @ 216000-1504000

ROM benchmarks

Can someone please make a benchmarks for most popular x8 roms! it would help for me and for others as well, i suppose!
anyone who can take this advantage

I can tell you mine.
Using XGin 5.3 with no overclock or undervolt, I get ~1000 in Quadrant and ~1500 in AnTuTu Benchmark

I'm using Floyo v1.0 with [email protected]
I get ~1100 in Quadrant(Advanced Version,I found Standard's score is lower than Advance's.)
Edit:Without OC,The score is ~1000

Using FroyoBread v020
No OC, No UV
Quadrant Advanced: 1100~1155
Neo Core: 44~48
Linpack: 4.1~4.3

I get 993 on my X8 with miniCM6 by ponanovn.
No OC, no UV, but I installed x8MDDI-lagfix.

Cool! and how about the 3D marks? just curious!
would be cool if someone could make a diagramm with x8 rom benchmarks
may go for it...but i guess im too busy for such fun!
nice, now i have to decide...was flasing a rom and my mum badly touched the phone it fell down battery out...
i cant decide between hackdroid floyo 1.0 and froyobread the newest!

having froyobread v021 now and got 726 points in quadrant... didn't ever get such low points..

i get around 820 to 860 on quadrant standard and Neo Core: 44~46
i have overlocked to 720mhz which pretty much stable and undervolt but don't know which app best for this can help me i am using foryobread 0.21v

[Q] CM9 performance i9001

Hi everyone,
I had installed CM9 RC2 by ivendors and it's graet
there is some lag using UI and it's very slow loading cantacts.
How can I increase performance? now i check only 16bit transparentcy.
thanks
Carlo

Use CastagnaIT's kernel and adreno jelly beam drivers from galaxy w.
Smooth UI, all games work well, 4400 antutu score @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2
Do not use app killers and manual kill only aps that you don't use often.
Good luck and Pm if you need links.
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app

Invendor RC3 Release, it is recommended

benchmark results
thank you everyone.
I try different setting to find best performance.
the results of my benchmark are shown below ( 16bit transparentcy checked ):
Invendor rc3.1
4028 antutu score
2446 Quadrant Standard score
Invendor rc3.1 + CastagnaIT Kernel v6.3 @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2
4175 antutu score
2538 Quadrant Standard score
Invendor rc3.1 + CastagnaIT Kernel v6.3 @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2 + JB Adreno libs
4127 antutu score
2651 Quadrant Standard score
bye

Frankly speaking i don't see any problem with low performance slow device etc...
Updated to RC3 yesterday and I'm glad to have it.
Typed with my I9001

Benchmark Thread

This thread is simply for people to display their benchmark scores instead of cluttering development threads,hopefully it'll be used for what its intended
Sent from my Xperia X10 using xda premium
Sent from my Xperia X10 using xda premium

FERALAB V21 - FeraKernel V3.6 GB Stock UB
UPDATE :
ROM and Kernel : Feralab V21 and Ferakernel V3.6 UB Stock GB.
CPU Freq : 998 MHz and 1190 MHz
FPS2D : 54 fps
Note :
Was posted on the original thread
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
FYI
Regards

my post moved from Developent
antutu score - 4329
fps2d - avg 44
kernel: FeraKernel 1.7 NV
ROM: scritch007 CMX10 v6
Clock: min: 245 max: 1190 performace deadline
transparency: 16bit
surface improvement: disable
sd card: standard 8GB - delivered with phone

XPERIA X10i Hardware
SDCard: SanDisk UHS-I 64GB (SanDisk Ultra Mobile Class6 4GB card used for benchmarks)
Battery: Mugen Power 1800mAh
DoomKernel v6 unlocked bootloader with GB v2.3.3 (My Daily)
Kernel: DoomKernel v6
ROM: X10S v9 GB 2.3.4 (95 system applications)
Add On: XPERIA S Apps
CPU: SetCPU 1113-1228MHz Governor: SmartAssv2/Performance i/o: sio
Optimisation: Link2SD with second partition.
3DMark: n/a Not available for X10i
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 3109 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v3.1.1: 3242 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v3.2.2: 3317 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v4.0.4: 4130 @ 1228MHz
NenaMark2: 8.4fps
FPS2D: 54 avg
iPerf: 22Mbits/s write to NAS over 802.11g
Quadrant: 1019
GeekBench2: 542
Battery: 5days where phone is left to idle and only very light use..
Epic Citadel: 11.2fps @854x480 on performance
Yes, it wouldn't really be playable on an XPERIA X10i but the benchmark does have it's uses given the graphics environment
and besides, it looks pretty while benchmarking even with the major lag/freezes... .
I would post a screenshot, but I use aScreenshot.apk and it gets swapped out to run Epic Citadel .
SDcard benchmark for a range of cards
Amin Kernel with CM10 v8.1(Scritch007)
3DMark: n/a coming soon
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 4550 [clock:1190MHz][Governorerformance][i/o:sio]
NenaMark2: 11fps
FPS2D: 43 avg...No Adreno 200 2D HW acceleration
Quadrant: 1044
GeekBench2: 448 clock:1128MHz raw CPU grunt doesn't seem to better OC'd GB 2.3.3 ????
Epic Citadel: 11fps ...lower frame rate but appears to run smoother.
Achotjan JB 4.1.2 Somc Debrand Engine Project
3DMark: 537
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 5840 [clock:1228MHz][Governorerformance][i/o:deadline]
NenaMark2: 11.2fps
FPS2D: 50 avg...Adreno 200 2D HW acceleration
Quadrant: 1005
GeekBench2: 386 clock:1128MHz raw CPU grunt doesn't seem to better OC'd GB 2.3.3 ????
Epic Citadel: n/a

FeraLab GB V21 + Bares V2 Add-on
FINALLY!!!
I get 3382 for 998MHz and 3574 for 1113MHz.
The problem?? Haha.... That's weird....
Please use Antutu Benchmark v3.0.3 instead the latest one!!!
So for those who can't get the score, PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE OP AND BARES'S POST!!!
DON'T FORGET THE ANTUTU BENCHMARK VERSION TOO!!
998MHz
1113MHz with RAM Manager [Balance (More Free RAM)]
This is my score after install everything into the phone
Last but not least, THANK YOU FERA AND BARES!!!

Απ: Benchmark Thread
V21 with Bares addon!
Στάλθηκε από το X10i μου

memory card score below average?
what type of sd card u all using? because mine is class 10 of 32gb but cant get score like u all get for sd card reading and writing only half of what u all get.
i only get 3049 antutu benchmark 3.0.3.

Scores don't really matter.i find youtube videos play better with 4.5 fera stock kernel.they dont lag or buffer.on 3.6 they do.that's om my phone.the 4.5 kernel does get a lower benchmark score but performs better watching videos and playing games
Sent from my X10i using xda premium

bodomfan said:
Scores don't really matter.i find youtube videos play better with 4.5 fera stock kernel.they dont lag or buffer.on 3.6 they do.that's om my phone.the 4.5 kernel does get a lower benchmark score but performs better watching videos and playing games
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I though this thread just for benchmark test result only (for all roms and kernels) , lol .
Also, i just read your post on Fera's thread, it seem. ....... ???
BTW, okay my friend, i will delete all those files, no problem I'm just try to share it.
also i dont want to messed the thread, and made confusing, sorry my bad .
@Antony & Prioxxx
Bro, above kernel and addon are Feravolt's work,
so. ... all credits goes to him.
I'm just re-pack it, so we can use Ferakernel V3.6 UB on Feralab V21 rom with the proper methode (at least for me).
Goodbye and, yeah have a nice day everybody
Best Regards

Keep 3.6 addon for ppl who prefer it
I just prefer 4.5 kernel
Sent from my X10i using xda premium

Hi!
It is normal to get 2769 in AnTuTu v3.0.3 with Feralab v21 UB without mods and 1.113 GHz?
The phone seems very fast and stable, but do not understand the result.
Thank you!
Greetings!

-=SrgiO=- said:
Hi!
It is normal to get 2769 in AnTuTu v3.0.3 with Feralab v21 UB without mods and 1.113 GHz?
The phone seems very fast and stable, but do not understand the result.
Thank you!
Greetings!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi bro, definitely this is normal.
But i have one question here :
Have you tried Ferakernel V3.6 UB before? , on any GB stock rom? such as Feralab V20?
Regards

CM7zmod3 DoomKernel v6 1113MHz ULBL
latest antutu
Sent from my X10 using xda app-developers app

Bares said:
Hi bro, definitely this is normal.
But i have one question here :
Have you tried Ferakernel V3.6 UB before? , on any GB stock rom? such as Feralab V20?
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello!
Then, I can breathe easy xD
Yes, I tried various combinations, both as DonutHD 2.3 UB and FeraLab v20 UB with Ferakernel 3.6. UB. Performance is excellent but a week of use, I began having reboots with FeraLab v20, did several wipes and factory resets but still the same. However are the best I've had (DonutHD and FLv20).
Now I'm testing the FeraLab v21 and now everything is very smooth and no reboots for now...
Thank you very much for your attention.
Greetings!

Rom : Feralab V21
Kernel : Ferakernel + Bares's Addon

AnTuTu v3.2.2
AnTuTu 3.2.2 is now available from Google Play store.
It appears to be adding a 'considerably' higher 3D and slightly higher 2D graphics score now. CPU Integer scores drop slightly.
Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10i benchmarks running DoomKernel v6 and GB 2.3.3
I have the same build for over 6 months with only minor build.prop 'tweaks' and the odd bit of memory freed after culling system apps down to 95, so I'm not thinking this is anything much different about my build, but I am seeing approx 208 points extra in the score since AnTuTu v3.0.3 and most of that is coming from 2D and 3D graphics scores.
Just to be all white coat, beard and thick rim glasses, I did re-install AnTuTu v3.0.3 again and re-test. The results are still consistent with old scores where we see higher CPU integer score and lower 2D and 3D graphics scores with AnTuTu v3.0.3
My old AnTuTu v3.0.3 score was 3109 and my current re-tested AnTuTu v3.0.3 score is 3101 - 3124 so any increase in AnTuTu scores is a reflection of AnTuTu's new version 3.2.2 and not any changes in your build.
So with the AnTuTu v3.2.2 scores we should all be seeing approx 200 points improvement on our AnTuTu v3.0.3 scores before we even consider any improvements attributed to developer changes.
Mind you if I was a ROM developer I'd be happy my ROM increased by 200 points in an AnTuTu benchmark over 3 months, even when I'd done nothing, but smiled and waved.
All a bit of a giggle, but it's nice to see the XPERIA X10i going up in AnTuTu scores with the same ROM/Kernel build rather than going down.
---------- Post added at 03:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 AM ----------
As a separate update with regards to benchmarking, I see Futuremark has listed 02-APR-2013 for Android.
Futuremark 3DMark for Android
[Update] I see that 3DMark is not supported on the XPERIA X10i, I tried side loading and just get an error.

Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang

whitefang3456 said:
Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry to side track a little bit, can you play candy crush on this rom? I tried, but no success in all mode.

whitefang3456 said:
Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omg! How did you get that high 3D score?
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app

anguslaw said:
sorry to side track a little bit, can you play candy crush on this rom? I tried, but no success in all mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did able to play..did u messed up somehow?
View attachment 1853701
Whitefang
jai554 said:
Omg! How did you get that high 3D score?
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha ya should ask senior FeraVolt, I have no idea in theory yet hehe. Sorry XP
Whitefang