Database Users

Camera quality

Hello everyone.
I've decided to open this post on JIRA : https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/BACON-4582
It happens that this is problably one of the last updates CM is going to offer for us. Which means newer blobs won't be developed after it. Camera from Cyanogen OS and also CyanogenMod have a very bad picture quality. Creates artifacts as also do not record properly.
We have very poor picture on low light, and a very poor performer on camera quality.
This is related to bad blobs, not only to say that they are almost 2 years old, but also we have this problem since 2014.
So if you do not agree with this Camera quality and want to show CM that you are not happy with this performance. Make a vote, and leave a comment in that link stating your unhappiness with camera.
I believe if we all do this together, we actually will change.
Thanks

jgcaap said:
Hello everyone.
I've decided to open this post on JIRA : https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/BACON-4582
It happens that this is problably one of the last updates CM is going to offer for us. Which means newer blobs won't be developed after it. Camera from Cyanogen OS and also CyanogenMod have a very bad picture quality. Creates artifacts as also do not record properly.
We have very poor picture on low light, and a very poor performer on camera quality.
This is related to bad blobs, not only to say that they are almost 2 years old, but also we have this problem since 2014.
So if you do not agree with this Camera quality and want to show CM that you are not happy with this performance. Make a vote, and leave a comment in that link stating your unhappiness with camera.
I believe if we all do this together, we actually will change.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is already a report of that. I think yours will be closed soon. Amd this bug is already exists for a very long time. Maybe you have more success with that. I hope with snapdragon camera many things will be changed and hopefully fixed.
Thats why is switched to sultans rom. He uses a camera hal without that bug.

DerRomtester said:
There is already a report of that. I think yours will be closed soon. Amd this bug is already exists for a very long time. Maybe you have more success with that. I hope with snapdragon camera many things will be changed and hopefully fixed.
Thats why is switched to sultans rom. He uses a camera hal without that bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK his hal doesnt fix this issues but oxygen blobs, which have other limitations.. Btw his hal perfectly uses all features available even if oxygen didnt implement these..
Wysłane z mojego A0001 przy użyciu Tapatalka

From what I observed while testing sultans rom, the auto white balance is broken.
Too much blue in daylight when shooting gras, too much red in lowlight situations.
I was annoyed constantly changing the white balance and went back to stock cm.

AcmE85 said:
From what I observed while testing sultans rom, the auto white balance is broken.
Too much blue in daylight when shooting gras, too much red in lowlight situations.
I was annoyed constantly changing the white balance and went back to stock cm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe a strange question but since I notice you have a knowledge of white balance etc have you ever tried ColorOS ?
I've used it for a long time and I found the camera, and image quality, a lot better than CM. Well it is extremely difficult to check if you can't really compare side to side.
They were able to make the ColorOS camera to work on CM but to be honest I don't think that the result were the same.

gerciolisz said:
AFAIK his hal doesnt fix this issues but oxygen blobs, which have other limitations.. Btw his hal perfectly uses all features available even if oxygen didnt implement these..
Wysłane z mojego A0001 przy użyciu Tapatalka
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I asked sultan and he replied that the problem is related to the camera hal. Have you already fixed that with different blobs ?

DerRomtester said:
I asked sultan and he replied that the problem is related to the camera hal. Have you already fixed that with different blobs ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ppl sayin that oos blobs works good.. If so we can use his HAL and his changes to repair it in hal with cm blobs..
Wysłane z mojego A0001 przy użyciu Tapatalka

Can anyone review Sultan's Camera (CAF Roms) vs CM13/COS13 camera blobs vs Color OS camera blobs?

Haiqal Johari said:
Can anyone review Sultan's Camera (CAF Roms) vs CM13/COS13 camera blobs vs Color OS camera blobs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've taken some photos mate but for my own use so its stupid things like a photo of my keyboard, and a photo of my face (selfy) the back camera doesnt change too much (for me) but the front camera has a big difference to say its the same camera, still not perfect but much better especially on snapchat. However on snapchat on sultans, the exposer doesnt change where as on cm it does. It removed those weird purple green lines too for when u take a video. :good:

Hey guys, can we make a quick comparison between OOS / CM (stock) / ColorOS HAL/Blobs?
OxygenOS blobs:
+ good image quality
+ best video performance (1080p 60fps with audio; QHD&FHD video on front camera, slow-motion, etc.)
+ manual focus works (with ColorOS app)
- no slow shutter >2sec.
- most ColorOS plugins don't work (e.g. clear image 50mp)
ColorOS blobs:
+ very good image quality
+ fully compatible with ColorOS camera
+ 50MP
+ long exposure up to 64sec.
+ good video performance
- no slow motion (120fps @720p)
- no 1080p 60fps with audio
- only 720p front camera
CM / Stock blobs:
+ long exposure up to 64sec.
+ 50MP clear image
+ slow motion up to 120fps @720p
- worst image quality
- no 1080p @60fps with audio
- only 720p front camera
- bad overall video performance (artefacts, lines, etc.)
Roms:
OOS blobs: cm13 by SultanXDA
ColorOS blobs: cm13 by jpcaap / Darkobas
Stock: Stock Rom / Exodus
If something is wrong or you want to add something, please feel free to comment

What camera blobs that Paranoid Android use?

Did not see this thread before, i would vote if i saw it.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

Haiqal Johari said:
What camera blobs that Paranoid Android use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is something I want to know too. I think its the cm one pal. If your on the rom, go to snapchat and check if exposure is working. If not then its caf, if it is then cm

Now I've been wondering about this for a while! Can't really do scientific comparison on my end, but since now Darkobas uses ColorOS blob, I'm def gonna try it out.
Either way, I wouldn't hope CM develops our camera further...and so far, best over-all camera experience is with Sultan's.

Jumped from Sultan's CM13 rom to CM13 Nightly because of battery issues on Sultan's. All I can say right now picture quality from stock CM13 nightly is decent enough when you turned off Zero Shutter Lag.

Haiqal Johari said:
Jumped from Sultan's CM13 rom to CM13 Nightly because of battery issues on Sultan's. All I can say right now picture quality from stock CM13 nightly is decent enough when you turned off Zero Shutter Lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't share your oppinion, I think that CM13 picture quality is really bad compared to what we had with KitKat.

nuno- said:
I don't share your oppinion, I think that CM13 picture quality is really bad compared to what we had with KitKat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I agree with you. Missed the old kitkat days.. Better battery life and camera. Now, I'm on Darkobas that has ColorOS camera hal. The front camera is grainy on Snapchat.. I try to live with that for now. Overall camera quality is decent.. Way better than CM13 camera hal. But still, Sultan's camera hal is the best for our device! I flashed Darkobas because of battery life issues that I faced on Sultan's rom.. If not, Sultan CM13 is the best

Haiqal Johari said:
Yes. I agree with you. Missed the old kitkat days.. Better battery life and camera. Now, I'm on Darkobas that has ColorOS camera hal. The front camera is grainy on Snapchat.. I try to live with that for now. Overall camera quality is decent.. Way better than CM13 camera hal. But still, Sultan's camera hal is the best for our device! I flashed Darkobas because of battery life issues that I faced on Sultan's rom.. If not, Sultan CM13 is the best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try CandySix anf INT3NESE's Darkobas. AOSP based with great battery life and Sultal's camera.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

anbinhv said:
Try CandySix anf INT3NESE's Darkobas. AOSP based with great battery life and Sultal's camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your recommendation. I have tried CandySix but I still facing battery issues and INT3NESE's Darkobas is too laggy for me I'm on H2OS now.

Rom With Best camera Output!!!

Hello gUYS,
Which rom has the best camera app? and is it possible to Get oxygen OS camera'S beauty mode in Cm based roms?
Please Suggest:!!!!

Sultans ROM is probably the best with AOSPA coming in second

krishnak1 said:
Hello gUYS,
Which rom has the best camera app? and is it possible to Get oxygen OS camera'S beauty mode in Cm based roms?
Please Suggest:!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mokee

Color OS , No doubt

Why not install any rom you like and simply install sultans camera Hal in it.? Wouldn't be the same results in camera quality?
Omicron Technics

kethsawant said:
Color OS , No doubt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Colour OS as well as H2OS....
Dead Cookies leave no trails...

After using purity, sultans cm13, cm13, DU rom, AOSPA, roms, I have to say that the stock OOS camera is unmatched. Nothing comes close, not even with sultan hal installed, (even if stock OOS suffers from low fps in dark light). In terms of clarity, and image quality is by far the best. Combined with the best possible GSM reception and by far the fastest LTE speeds (in most cases not even close in rom vs OOS speeds tested in the very same spot) is a no brainer for me. At least for now, until some roms incorporate those two major assets. On the other hand every single one custom rom are by a far smoother than OOS, more memory distribution efficient, and of course by a far more customisable. That's my point of view after all those tests. Depending on priorities, each of as makes its choice.
Omicron Technics

sniper20 said:
After using purity, sultans cm13, cm13, DU rom, AOSPA, roms, I have to say that the stock OOS camera is unmatched.
Omicron Technics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you try the OOS camera ported on MM Roms, for example Sultan's CM13?

I only tired OSS abd Sultan CM13.
IMO, OSS.

Ive tried the OOS port into all of the above roms, but although it was a bit better than the roms integrated camera apps, was nowhere near the OOS clarity. I dont know what the stock OOS does with the camera quality, but it's significantly ahead (even fir someone that is no photographer or photo expert) of other roms. Something it's in the coding, or settings, I don't realy know, but the difference is easily noticeable.
Omicron Technics

CM13 with Google Camera and OOS Camera is pretty good

sniper20 said:
Ive tried the OOS port into all of the above roms, but although it was a bit better than the roms integrated camera apps, was nowhere near the OOS clarity. I dont know what the stock OOS does with the camera quality, but it's significantly ahead (even fir someone that is no photographer or photo expert) of other roms. Something it's in the coding, or settings, I don't realy know, but the difference is easily noticeable.
Omicron Technics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's placebo. The same exact HAL is used in custom ROMs. The only thing you could possibly be referring to is the camera app itself and whatever they call it... Clear something or other...

Pics are taken without clear mod or any other special setting. Maybe it's a placebo effect, but the difference was obvious from the first time I installed a custom rom. No matter how good was the rom (in most cases was much better than OOS in terms of smoothess), and still till now that installed the OOS back I have the same opinion. Maybe it's a placebo effect I don't know.
Omicron Technics

No plaCebo efffect....i have experienced twice after flashin cm13 by sultan..quality is very bad
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app

sniper20 said:
After using purity, sultans cm13, cm13, DU rom, AOSPA, roms, I have to say that the stock OOS camera is unmatched. Nothing comes close, not even with sultan hal installed, (even if stock OOS suffers from low fps in dark light). In terms of clarity, and image quality is by far the best. Combined with the best possible GSM reception and by far the fastest LTE speeds (in most cases not even close in rom vs OOS speeds tested in the very same spot) is a no brainer for me. At least for now, until some roms incorporate those two major assets. On the other hand every single one custom rom are by a far smoother than OOS, more memory distribution efficient, and of course by a far more customisable. That's my point of view after all those tests. Depending on priorities, each of as makes its choice.
Omicron Technics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So Stock OOS has better cam quality vs Sultans Cam HAL OOS?

Yes ...stock camera is way bettr or u can say..Cm13 camera sucks
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app

It really depends...Stock camera app reduces a lot of noise, making the pics seem better. It actually removes detail in the process of removing noise. btw you can just flash OOS camera app on cm13 or other rom and it will be like stock (except clear image wont work, but clear image is really more of a marketing gimmick, it removes a lot of noise from pics, taking away lots of detail)

Do you know you can also remove noise on CM13 camera (snap)?

I have tried OOS camera port in every other rom I have installed, and the result was nowhere near the OOS camera in OOS. I don't know what it's different, may there is something more, but im convinced that its not a placebo effect. I dont know. If you count also the fact that lte speed is wayyyyy faster ( in OOS ookla test maxed at 125 maps, instead of 40 in every other rom in the same spot and time of day. I also don't know what seams to be the problem in custom roms for now ) than every custom rom, for me is a no go for custom roms. At least for now. And I must say that I love their smoothness. But.....
Omicron Technics

In my experience picture quality depends heavily on the camera app used. Ie i get awful results with snap cam. Using fv-5 and camera zoom which produce nice quality (running aicp, stock hal)
Gesendet von meinem ONE E1003

Camera Quality without Oxygen OS

Do we lose camera detail when installing other ROMs than Oxygen OS/Freedom OS?
Or we keep the same because OOS is AOSP?
thank you

up

Camera quality will be slightly worse until we get sultanxda and some others working on it. Oneplus is great with releasing kernel source, but they won't release camera blobs, so getting camera quality up takes some Dev work.

Goronok said:
Camera quality will be slightly worse until we get sultanxda and some others working on it. Oneplus is great with releasing kernel source, but they won't release camera blobs, so getting camera quality up takes some Dev work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!

Camera: OOS vs Paranoid vs sultan vs GCam port

Hi,
I'm opening this thread to discuss the several camera options there are available, so that all are informed by the options available.
There is OOS camera with HD and HDR.
There Paranoid camera which claims to be even better than stock OOS
Sultan camera, which sultanxda put a lot of effort improving the camera
GCam port that has HDR+
Share your experience with each, saying which camera you like best. If possible, detail the best camera that:
- provides the most accurate color
- provides the best motion/action picture
- provides the best low light condition
Share your photos indicating the camera app was used.

I personally use gcam to do most of my shooting. It provides the best dynamic range and image "crispness". I also enjoy how quick it shoots too.
The only time I'll switch from it is to shoot raw and manual on the Stock OOS camera.
When I'm shooting video (1080p 60fps) I usually use the OOS camera just because 60fps in gcam stutters for me on occasion.

rykanator said:
I personally use gcam to do most of my shooting. It provides the best dynamic range and image "crispness". I also enjoy how quick it shoots too.
The only time I'll switch from it is to shoot raw and manual on the Stock OOS camera.
When I'm shooting video (1080p 60fps) I usually use the OOS camera just because 60fps in gcam stutters for me on occasion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried paranoid yourself?

immi803 said:
Have you tried paranoid yourself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I have not, I ran PA 7.3 for a while, but never used the PA camera. Currently running OB17

immi803 said:
Have you tried paranoid yourself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm very curious about PA. Can you share some pics?

I have used paranoid android 7.3 and I have realised that OOS camera is the best in low lighting as PA camera also does well in good lighting condition.

Paranoid camera app is very good. 60 fps on 1080p works very good. It is snappy too. OOS camera on latest beta not that snappy.

klaymaniaf said:
Paranoid camera app is very good. 60 fps on 1080p works very good. It is snappy too. OOS camera on latest beta not that snappy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you think about low light photos in PA? And motion pictures? Can you share some pics?

I have used the OOS camers on OB17 / OB16 / OB15
I have also used the Google camera app.
In my opinion the OOS camera app is better at low-light shooting plus regular shooting is pretty good. I have not tried the latest ported version of the OP5 OOS camera app but I am curious, so will probably try at some point.
I have not used PA. The Sultanxda camera app has a boatload of options which in my opinion is overkill for a regular user like me.

dcop7 said:
I'm very curious about PA. Can you share some pics?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hasn't used paranoid ever, can't help in this regard, i myself curious about paranoid

Thats my usage:
Low light: Google cam with HDR+
Daylight in raw: OOS
Daylight jpg: Google cam with HDR+
Video: OOS

Personally I'm using Google Camera for quick shots at college, but at parties or something, I'm shooting RAWs with Snap Camera HDR - because it limits max ISO to 799, where OOS can go up to 3200 (and leave you with very much noise).
For videos I'm using OOS camera - recording 1080p60.

Daytime: Stock OOS Cam
Nighttime: Google Cam HDR+ :good:

Is there a version of the updated PA camera from 7.3.1? for me PA Cam so far gave the best results regarding image detail, since it doesnt use noise reduction, or it can at least be setup so.

reawo said:
Is there a version of the updated PA camera from 7.3.1? for me PA Cam so far gave the best results regarding image detail, since it doesnt use noise reduction, or it can at least be setup so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even compared with OOS?

Some photos I took solely to note the differences in low light for noise and color reproduction:
17-06-22 - OnePlus 3T - ROM & Camera Image Processing Comparison - Paranoid, Sultan, Oxygen
https://goo.gl/photos/BUFDMEc4uThYXuoW6
I currently use the Google Camera port with HDR, though for long exposures I use the OxygenOS camera, and also like that one for full resolution bursts.

dcop7 said:
Even compared with OOS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just compare the file sizes of those two camera apps, the details in OOS cam get a disgusting watercolor effect.
the ones from PA cam look nice and are like 10mb bigger than OOS camera ones.

stevenswall said:
Some photos I took solely to note the differences in low light for noise and color reproduction:
17-06-22 - OnePlus 3T - ROM & Camera Image Processing Comparison - Paranoid, Sultan, Oxygen
https://goo.gl/photos/BUFDMEc4uThYXuoW6
I currently use the Google Camera port with HDR, though for long exposures I use the OxygenOS camera, and also like that one for full resolution bursts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new PA update should improve the camera app. It is possible to compare with that version? Specially in low light and motion/action shots? I like OOS camera, but in low light and motion/action shots... Could be better. I'm curious about PA in these scenarios

dcop7 said:
The new PA update should improve the camera app. It is possible to compare with that version? Specially in low light and motion/action shots? I like OOS camera, but in low light and motion/action shots... Could be better. I'm curious about PA in these scenarios
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, as this was all done months ago and I wouldn't be able to set up the exact same scene, and don't wish to re-flash all of the various roms, rename files, etc.
...Though I'd certainly pay for a good photographer to do this with the various ROMs in different conditions.

stevenswall said:
No, as this was all done months ago and I wouldn't be able to set up the exact same scene, and don't wish to re-flash all of the various roms, rename files, etc.
...Though I'd certainly pay for a good photographer to do this with the various ROMs in different conditions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I understand completely

Lenovo P2 kuntao main camera fix in HAL3 mode (Gcam HDR+ fix)

So, its known Lenovo P2 (kuntao) has camera bug when using HAL3 mode with RAW capture, it look like pink lines instead of preview and captured pictures. I fixed this ****, now all HAL3 apps working fine. Google camera mods working including HDR+ mode.
changelog:
v1
*Initial release - fixed raw photo
v2
* Fixed issue with video recording in Lineage Snap camera, less changed bytes
* Please test and write review if this version all fine to you, if its fine, will be included in next Lineage releases.
v3
* Only 2 bytes changed compared to stock lib, so have to be least negative impact on previous working apps as possible. Please report if it breaks something.
choose one of the attachments depending on what rom you using. If you have treble enabled rom please use kuntao_fix_main_cam_v2_8.1treble.zip (149.0 KB) and if you using 7.1.2 based or 8.1 with no treble use kuntao_fix_main_cam_v2_7.1.zip (149.2 KB)
Install it using recovery and test camera apps. I have tested Google camera mod MGC_5.1.018.177624777-41364271.apk (BSG, 2018-07-12) from https://www.celsoazevedo.com/files/android/google-camera/ . It has working HDR+ mode when choosing Nexus 6P model.
If it fixed camera for you, I will appreciate small donation https://www.paypal.me/VitaliyTomin

And second small fix is for those who want to use front cam in Gcam. Set black level 16 for front camera, or you will get green/yellow tint.

What about the dark video in both front and back from default camera

Sure i will donate 100rs
Don't you have paytm?

It works! I am on Arnova 7.9 official, the one with a red link on celsoazevedo link.

Anybody upload some sample photos and specify the (config) details if applicable.

Can I just flash this as a new user ? Do I have to flash anything else

@highwaystar_ru add portrait fix in topic too

Amazing job!
With official LineageOs 15.1 the pictures are a little pink-ish to me.

Damn it worked.
using latest beta version GCam_5.3.015-Pixel3Mod-Arnova8G2-v4Beta4.apk by Arnova8G2 and portrait mode is damn fine.
Everything is working except slow motion video.
Thanks @highwaystar_ru and @celoxocis
I was hoping that mike would do it didn't expected from you guys and after reading @celoxocis comment few days ago about some imx258 blob problem i thought this day will never come.
Official lineage oreo and now gcam. You guys rocks.

shabab malik said:
Damn it worked.
using latest beta version GCam_5.3.015-Pixel3Mod-Arnova8G2-v4Beta4.apk by Arnova8G2 and portrait mode is damn fine.
Everything is working except slow motion video.
Thanks @highwaystar_ru and @celoxocis
I was hoping that mike would do it didn't expected from you guys and after reading @celoxocis comment few days ago about some imx258 blob problem i thought this day will never come.
Official lineage oreo and now gcam. You guys rocks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@highwaystar_ru did all the hard work!
i was simply supporting him in trying to find possible proper alternative blobs and checking their content using hex values. while he spend days with IDA to make the original blobs work!
ne never gave up! the results speak for themselves!

Good work @highwaystar_ru , did you take library of p2 and you fixed it or did you ported from another device?

Photo quality is astounding ! Using latest camera mod from the provided link.
Many thanks !
When using treble and LOS 15.1 - will the mod survive system updates, being in the Vendor partition ?

on the latest beta. I noticed when it is to dark and you switch to front camera. it crashes the app. anyone know a possible fix for that? I remember reading something on a OnePlus subforum. but can't remember where.

matteo0026 said:
Good work @highwaystar_ru , did you take library of p2 and you fixed it or did you ported from another device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He ported from nubiam2

b50corei5 said:
He ported from nubiam2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what now gcam work fine who care for from where he port. Appreciate there work

celoxocis said:
on the latest beta. I noticed when it is to dark and you switch to front camera. it crashes the app. anyone know a possible fix for that? I remember reading something on a OnePlus subforum. but can't remember where.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried front camera on almost all lighting conditions just to tried what's working and not. I haven't encounter any crash on low lighting (i have tried even in complete dark too) but i have face 1 crash using front camera in outdoor lighting. It just freeze for 1 second and then crash. I have changed some setting in the app.
Look at the hdr+ photo it's just not look like it's from our camera

shabab malik said:
I have tried front camera on almost all lighting conditions just to tried what's working and not. I haven't encounter any crash on low lighting (i have tried even in complete dark too) but i have face 1 crash using front camera in outdoor lighting. It just freeze for 1 second and then crash. I have changed some setting in the app.
Look at the hdr+ photo it's just not look like it's from our camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went back to MGC_5.1.018.177624777-41364271.apk which is rock stable. in the beta the front camera (selfie camera) was crashing too much in my tests. especially when switching cameras. it's probably an issue with the beta.
now if we had a fix for video camera support for 30fps and 60fps. that would be great. all recordings now are in 24fps. which are smooth and without micro stuttering. even on Open Camera. but Snap Camera (default LineageOS Camera) refuses to take a video recording without 30fps at least.

celoxocis said:
I went back to MGC_5.1.018.177624777-41364271.apk which is rock stable. in the beta the front camera (selfie camera) was crashing too much in my tests. especially when switching cameras. it's probably an issue with the beta.
now if we had a fix for video camera support for 30fps and 60fps. that would be great. all recordings now are in 24fps. which are smooth and without micro stuttering. even on Open Camera. but Snap Camera (default LineageOS Camera) refuses to take a video recording without 30fps at least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it possible for our cam to capture at 60fps?

ASP02 said:
Is it possible for our cam to capture at 60fps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well in theory. yes. it should be able thanks to @highwaystar_ru
he added the profiles [email protected] 24 fps and [email protected] fps to the video profile to the back camera.
but the rom media profiles xml needs to be adjusted i think. for it to work with snap. for now snap and OpenCamera will record in [email protected] fps.
i haven't tested 4k yet.