Hello gUYS,
Which rom has the best camera app? and is it possible to Get oxygen OS camera'S beauty mode in Cm based roms?
Please Suggest:!!!!
Sultans ROM is probably the best with AOSPA coming in second
krishnak1 said:
Hello gUYS,
Which rom has the best camera app? and is it possible to Get oxygen OS camera'S beauty mode in Cm based roms?
Please Suggest:!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mokee
Color OS , No doubt
Why not install any rom you like and simply install sultans camera Hal in it.? Wouldn't be the same results in camera quality?
Omicron Technics
kethsawant said:
Color OS , No doubt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Colour OS as well as H2OS....
Dead Cookies leave no trails...
After using purity, sultans cm13, cm13, DU rom, AOSPA, roms, I have to say that the stock OOS camera is unmatched. Nothing comes close, not even with sultan hal installed, (even if stock OOS suffers from low fps in dark light). In terms of clarity, and image quality is by far the best. Combined with the best possible GSM reception and by far the fastest LTE speeds (in most cases not even close in rom vs OOS speeds tested in the very same spot) is a no brainer for me. At least for now, until some roms incorporate those two major assets. On the other hand every single one custom rom are by a far smoother than OOS, more memory distribution efficient, and of course by a far more customisable. That's my point of view after all those tests. Depending on priorities, each of as makes its choice.
Omicron Technics
sniper20 said:
After using purity, sultans cm13, cm13, DU rom, AOSPA, roms, I have to say that the stock OOS camera is unmatched.
Omicron Technics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you try the OOS camera ported on MM Roms, for example Sultan's CM13?
I only tired OSS abd Sultan CM13.
IMO, OSS.
Ive tried the OOS port into all of the above roms, but although it was a bit better than the roms integrated camera apps, was nowhere near the OOS clarity. I dont know what the stock OOS does with the camera quality, but it's significantly ahead (even fir someone that is no photographer or photo expert) of other roms. Something it's in the coding, or settings, I don't realy know, but the difference is easily noticeable.
Omicron Technics
CM13 with Google Camera and OOS Camera is pretty good
sniper20 said:
Ive tried the OOS port into all of the above roms, but although it was a bit better than the roms integrated camera apps, was nowhere near the OOS clarity. I dont know what the stock OOS does with the camera quality, but it's significantly ahead (even fir someone that is no photographer or photo expert) of other roms. Something it's in the coding, or settings, I don't realy know, but the difference is easily noticeable.
Omicron Technics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's placebo. The same exact HAL is used in custom ROMs. The only thing you could possibly be referring to is the camera app itself and whatever they call it... Clear something or other...
Pics are taken without clear mod or any other special setting. Maybe it's a placebo effect, but the difference was obvious from the first time I installed a custom rom. No matter how good was the rom (in most cases was much better than OOS in terms of smoothess), and still till now that installed the OOS back I have the same opinion. Maybe it's a placebo effect I don't know.
Omicron Technics
No plaCebo efffect....i have experienced twice after flashin cm13 by sultan..quality is very bad
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
sniper20 said:
After using purity, sultans cm13, cm13, DU rom, AOSPA, roms, I have to say that the stock OOS camera is unmatched. Nothing comes close, not even with sultan hal installed, (even if stock OOS suffers from low fps in dark light). In terms of clarity, and image quality is by far the best. Combined with the best possible GSM reception and by far the fastest LTE speeds (in most cases not even close in rom vs OOS speeds tested in the very same spot) is a no brainer for me. At least for now, until some roms incorporate those two major assets. On the other hand every single one custom rom are by a far smoother than OOS, more memory distribution efficient, and of course by a far more customisable. That's my point of view after all those tests. Depending on priorities, each of as makes its choice.
Omicron Technics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So Stock OOS has better cam quality vs Sultans Cam HAL OOS?
Yes ...stock camera is way bettr or u can say..Cm13 camera sucks
Sent from my ONE E1003 using XDA-Developers mobile app
It really depends...Stock camera app reduces a lot of noise, making the pics seem better. It actually removes detail in the process of removing noise. btw you can just flash OOS camera app on cm13 or other rom and it will be like stock (except clear image wont work, but clear image is really more of a marketing gimmick, it removes a lot of noise from pics, taking away lots of detail)
Do you know you can also remove noise on CM13 camera (snap)?
I have tried OOS camera port in every other rom I have installed, and the result was nowhere near the OOS camera in OOS. I don't know what it's different, may there is something more, but im convinced that its not a placebo effect. I dont know. If you count also the fact that lte speed is wayyyyy faster ( in OOS ookla test maxed at 125 maps, instead of 40 in every other rom in the same spot and time of day. I also don't know what seams to be the problem in custom roms for now ) than every custom rom, for me is a no go for custom roms. At least for now. And I must say that I love their smoothness. But.....
Omicron Technics
In my experience picture quality depends heavily on the camera app used. Ie i get awful results with snap cam. Using fv-5 and camera zoom which produce nice quality (running aicp, stock hal)
Gesendet von meinem ONE E1003
Related
Hello everyone.
I've decided to open this post on JIRA : https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/BACON-4582
It happens that this is problably one of the last updates CM is going to offer for us. Which means newer blobs won't be developed after it. Camera from Cyanogen OS and also CyanogenMod have a very bad picture quality. Creates artifacts as also do not record properly.
We have very poor picture on low light, and a very poor performer on camera quality.
This is related to bad blobs, not only to say that they are almost 2 years old, but also we have this problem since 2014.
So if you do not agree with this Camera quality and want to show CM that you are not happy with this performance. Make a vote, and leave a comment in that link stating your unhappiness with camera.
I believe if we all do this together, we actually will change.
Thanks
jgcaap said:
Hello everyone.
I've decided to open this post on JIRA : https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/BACON-4582
It happens that this is problably one of the last updates CM is going to offer for us. Which means newer blobs won't be developed after it. Camera from Cyanogen OS and also CyanogenMod have a very bad picture quality. Creates artifacts as also do not record properly.
We have very poor picture on low light, and a very poor performer on camera quality.
This is related to bad blobs, not only to say that they are almost 2 years old, but also we have this problem since 2014.
So if you do not agree with this Camera quality and want to show CM that you are not happy with this performance. Make a vote, and leave a comment in that link stating your unhappiness with camera.
I believe if we all do this together, we actually will change.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is already a report of that. I think yours will be closed soon. Amd this bug is already exists for a very long time. Maybe you have more success with that. I hope with snapdragon camera many things will be changed and hopefully fixed.
Thats why is switched to sultans rom. He uses a camera hal without that bug.
DerRomtester said:
There is already a report of that. I think yours will be closed soon. Amd this bug is already exists for a very long time. Maybe you have more success with that. I hope with snapdragon camera many things will be changed and hopefully fixed.
Thats why is switched to sultans rom. He uses a camera hal without that bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK his hal doesnt fix this issues but oxygen blobs, which have other limitations.. Btw his hal perfectly uses all features available even if oxygen didnt implement these..
Wysłane z mojego A0001 przy użyciu Tapatalka
From what I observed while testing sultans rom, the auto white balance is broken.
Too much blue in daylight when shooting gras, too much red in lowlight situations.
I was annoyed constantly changing the white balance and went back to stock cm.
AcmE85 said:
From what I observed while testing sultans rom, the auto white balance is broken.
Too much blue in daylight when shooting gras, too much red in lowlight situations.
I was annoyed constantly changing the white balance and went back to stock cm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe a strange question but since I notice you have a knowledge of white balance etc have you ever tried ColorOS ?
I've used it for a long time and I found the camera, and image quality, a lot better than CM. Well it is extremely difficult to check if you can't really compare side to side.
They were able to make the ColorOS camera to work on CM but to be honest I don't think that the result were the same.
gerciolisz said:
AFAIK his hal doesnt fix this issues but oxygen blobs, which have other limitations.. Btw his hal perfectly uses all features available even if oxygen didnt implement these..
Wysłane z mojego A0001 przy użyciu Tapatalka
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I asked sultan and he replied that the problem is related to the camera hal. Have you already fixed that with different blobs ?
DerRomtester said:
I asked sultan and he replied that the problem is related to the camera hal. Have you already fixed that with different blobs ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ppl sayin that oos blobs works good.. If so we can use his HAL and his changes to repair it in hal with cm blobs..
Wysłane z mojego A0001 przy użyciu Tapatalka
Can anyone review Sultan's Camera (CAF Roms) vs CM13/COS13 camera blobs vs Color OS camera blobs?
Haiqal Johari said:
Can anyone review Sultan's Camera (CAF Roms) vs CM13/COS13 camera blobs vs Color OS camera blobs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've taken some photos mate but for my own use so its stupid things like a photo of my keyboard, and a photo of my face (selfy) the back camera doesnt change too much (for me) but the front camera has a big difference to say its the same camera, still not perfect but much better especially on snapchat. However on snapchat on sultans, the exposer doesnt change where as on cm it does. It removed those weird purple green lines too for when u take a video. :good:
Hey guys, can we make a quick comparison between OOS / CM (stock) / ColorOS HAL/Blobs?
OxygenOS blobs:
+ good image quality
+ best video performance (1080p 60fps with audio; QHD&FHD video on front camera, slow-motion, etc.)
+ manual focus works (with ColorOS app)
- no slow shutter >2sec.
- most ColorOS plugins don't work (e.g. clear image 50mp)
ColorOS blobs:
+ very good image quality
+ fully compatible with ColorOS camera
+ 50MP
+ long exposure up to 64sec.
+ good video performance
- no slow motion (120fps @720p)
- no 1080p 60fps with audio
- only 720p front camera
CM / Stock blobs:
+ long exposure up to 64sec.
+ 50MP clear image
+ slow motion up to 120fps @720p
- worst image quality
- no 1080p @60fps with audio
- only 720p front camera
- bad overall video performance (artefacts, lines, etc.)
Roms:
OOS blobs: cm13 by SultanXDA
ColorOS blobs: cm13 by jpcaap / Darkobas
Stock: Stock Rom / Exodus
If something is wrong or you want to add something, please feel free to comment
What camera blobs that Paranoid Android use?
Did not see this thread before, i would vote if i saw it.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Haiqal Johari said:
What camera blobs that Paranoid Android use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is something I want to know too. I think its the cm one pal. If your on the rom, go to snapchat and check if exposure is working. If not then its caf, if it is then cm
Now I've been wondering about this for a while! Can't really do scientific comparison on my end, but since now Darkobas uses ColorOS blob, I'm def gonna try it out.
Either way, I wouldn't hope CM develops our camera further...and so far, best over-all camera experience is with Sultan's.
Jumped from Sultan's CM13 rom to CM13 Nightly because of battery issues on Sultan's. All I can say right now picture quality from stock CM13 nightly is decent enough when you turned off Zero Shutter Lag.
Haiqal Johari said:
Jumped from Sultan's CM13 rom to CM13 Nightly because of battery issues on Sultan's. All I can say right now picture quality from stock CM13 nightly is decent enough when you turned off Zero Shutter Lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't share your oppinion, I think that CM13 picture quality is really bad compared to what we had with KitKat.
nuno- said:
I don't share your oppinion, I think that CM13 picture quality is really bad compared to what we had with KitKat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I agree with you. Missed the old kitkat days.. Better battery life and camera. Now, I'm on Darkobas that has ColorOS camera hal. The front camera is grainy on Snapchat.. I try to live with that for now. Overall camera quality is decent.. Way better than CM13 camera hal. But still, Sultan's camera hal is the best for our device! I flashed Darkobas because of battery life issues that I faced on Sultan's rom.. If not, Sultan CM13 is the best
Haiqal Johari said:
Yes. I agree with you. Missed the old kitkat days.. Better battery life and camera. Now, I'm on Darkobas that has ColorOS camera hal. The front camera is grainy on Snapchat.. I try to live with that for now. Overall camera quality is decent.. Way better than CM13 camera hal. But still, Sultan's camera hal is the best for our device! I flashed Darkobas because of battery life issues that I faced on Sultan's rom.. If not, Sultan CM13 is the best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try CandySix anf INT3NESE's Darkobas. AOSP based with great battery life and Sultal's camera.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
anbinhv said:
Try CandySix anf INT3NESE's Darkobas. AOSP based with great battery life and Sultal's camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your recommendation. I have tried CandySix but I still facing battery issues and INT3NESE's Darkobas is too laggy for me I'm on H2OS now.
I installed CM12 stable on my K3 note and so far its been pretty good performance wise compared to VibeUI.
However, I feel the camera quality has gone down drastically
I tried installing snapit camera on CM rom which i think is doing little better, but still i feel quality has gone down.
Is it just me, or cam quality in CM/AOSP roms is not that great ? And more importantly any fixes ?
tried differents versions of the snapit camera? Ive read somewhere that the IQ of the picture can be different. Also Lspeed mod disable the compression of the photo that seems to be enabled in most roms.
Mafioso said:
I installed CM12 stable on my K3 note and so far its been pretty good performance wise compared to VibeUI.
However, I feel the camera quality has gone down drastically
I tried installing snapit camera on CM rom which i think is doing little better, but still i feel quality has gone down.
Is it just me, or cam quality in CM/AOSP roms is not that great ? And more importantly any fixes ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeaah same here dude...
use different apps for camera instead of inbuilt cam. apps
that will solve you problem
This thread is solely created to compare the same picture (same exposure setting, ISO, focus, shutter time, etc) captured by the camera of various ROMS. Comparing like this is very effective to assess the quality of the camera and help the developers improve it
Feel free to suggest your favourite roms and I'll be happy to compare them all side by side. (Yes ! I've got a tripod to take steady pictures ). You can also post pictures taken (Sticking to the purpose of the thread can be helpful), they being the same images taken in different ROMs. I will post pictures from every rom weekly or biweekly
Most of the pictures will be indoors, so that the lighting is equal for every rom camera shoot
THE FULL SIZED PICTURES CAN BE FOUND IN MY DRIVE
THE PICTURES PROVIDED ARE CHOSEN AMONG THE MANY PICTURES SHOT FOR BETTER COMPARISON. THIS THREAD ISN'T AIMED TO PROVE WHICH ROM IS BETTER ! EVERYONE HAS DIFFERENT TASTES AND CHOICES ! HENCE THE PURPOSE OF THIS THREAD IS TO HELP EACH PERSON TO CHOOSE HIS INTERESTED ROMS BASED ON CAMERA QUALITY !
For every picture taken, the following were the settings
Auto Exposure : Frame Average
Picture Quality : 100%
Zero Shutter Lag : Off
Rest else Auto and same settings
The following are the ROMs to be compared
1.) Cyanogen OS 13
2.) Cyanogen MOD 13 (Not sure if there is gonna be any notable difference between the two)
3.) H2Os 2.0
4.) Oxygen OS 2.1.4
5.) Sultan's CM 13 (8th August Build)
6.) Latest JgCaap's (Color OS Blobs - Darkobas builds also have the same blobs)
7.) Latest Exodus
8.) Latest CandySix
9.) Latest Orion OS
10.) Marsh (20th June Build)
11.) Latest TugaPower (Both MM and N)
I guess a comparison between blobs is going to be more practical than including roms with the same hal!!And afaik we have 3 hals
Sultan:used in candy/RR CAF//Sultan Cm13//
Coloros: Used in Jgcap
And Cm:used in most of cm based roms
You can check this post for the differences
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=67354980&postcount=10
I dunno about h2os though.
Luc.Nex said:
I guess a comparison between blobs is going to be more practical than including roms with the same hal!!And afaik we have 3 hals
Sultan:used in candy/RR CAF//Sultan Cm13//
Coloros: Used in Jgcap
And Cm:used in most of cm based roms
You can check this post for the differences
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=67354980&postcount=10
I dunno about h2os though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, I know. But even then Candy and Sultan's varied a little bit. So, Color OS, Sultan's and CM have been compared. I'll put some pictures of Oxygen and H2Os later
With sultan's camera is the picture quality setting at 95% or 100%? Also is Zero Shutter Lag turned on or off? (saw people saying quality is better with it off, dunno if true...)
RonJeremyClarkson said:
With sultan's camera is the picture quality setting at 95% or 100%? Also is Zero Shutter Lag turned on or off? (saw people saying quality is better with it off, dunno if true...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes its better with it off
For every picture taken, the following were the settings
Auto Exposure : Frame Average
Picture Quality : 100%
Zero Shutter Lag : Off
Rest else Auto and same settings
guys, the HDR with cm13 is null, really there is no HDR like CM11s
MexiDroid said:
guys, the HDR with cm13 is null, really there is no HDR like CM11s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 11S s the boss of Roms ! for camera !! nothing can beat it !!
This also might help to decide.
CM vs ColorOS on jgcaap some time ago: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=66739583&postcount=14860
ZSL on vs ZSL off, and JPG vs DNG: http://imgur.com/a/fAmkp
Latest H2OS is the best
OOS 1.x.x vs OOS 3.x.x
Lineage OS Official (OOS 3.x.x blobs) and SlimNougat (OOS 1.x.x modded by Sultan)
Do a comparison of LineageOS 14.1, jgcaap CM13 (colorOS), sultanxda CM13 (OxygenOS blobs and his own camera HAL) and OxygenOS 3.1.4 port side-by-side. This would be very helpful!
Links-
https://forum.xda-developers.com/on.../official-lineageos-14-1-oneplus-one-t3543489
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-cm-12-builds-t3045053
https://forum.xda-developers.com/on...m-kernel-unofficial-cyanogenmod-13-0-t3242700
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-oxygenos-3-1-2-t3470907
Thanks!
Gawd said:
Do a comparison of LineageOS 14.1, jgcaap CM13 (colorOS), sultanxda CM13 (OxygenOS blobs and his own camera HAL) and OxygenOS 3.1.4 port side-by-side. This would be very helpful!
Links-
https://forum.xda-developers.com/on.../official-lineageos-14-1-oneplus-one-t3543489
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-cm-12-builds-t3045053
https://forum.xda-developers.com/on...m-kernel-unofficial-cyanogenmod-13-0-t3242700
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-oxygenos-3-1-2-t3470907
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM, Sultan HAL, Sultan OOS mod hal, colors os and OOS 3.x.x hal right ??
Prinz` said:
CM, Sultan HAL, Sultan OOS mod hal, colors os and OOS 3.x.x hal right ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM HAL, OOS 1.xx blobs+sultan's HAL (this combination is present in sultanxda's CM13), colorOS and OOS 3.xx
Compare all in auto (indoor+outdoor). Then compare them all in auto settings with HDR. Compare video as well if possible (you can upload it to YouTube).
Thanks.
Gawd said:
CM HAL, OOS 1.xx blobs+sultan's HAL (this combination is present in sultanxda's CM13), colorOS and OOS 3.xx
Compare all in auto (indoor+outdoor). Then compare them all in auto settings with HDR. Compare video as well if possible (you can upload it to YouTube).
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Auto settings may not be accurate to compare IMO. Having fixed parameters is better. Video is tough, but will give it a try. Kinda busy right now, so will upload them as soon as I get time
Which is better between oxygenos blobs and coloros?
Inviato dal mio A0001 utilizzando Tapatalk
Confucio1986 said:
Which is better between oxygenos blobs and coloros?
Inviato dal mio A0001 utilizzando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://forums.oneplus.net/threads/camera-quality-comparison-of-various-roms.464155/
Deleted.
It makes me sad that no one tried implementing the color os hal other than jgcaap from my own experience sultans hal is meh compared to color os hal, and OOS hal isn't much better than sultans (cm hal is horrible, tried it once and never again). Both Sultan and OOS are seriously lacking clarity and low-light performance. All my pictures are fuzzy unless there's a direct light source. Whereas with color os, I've taken pics of beachfires at night and there's little to no fuzzies, and colors are accurate. I even manage to capture the suns light rays. The other hals for whatever reason struggled with that.
ThunderThighs said:
It makes me sad that no one tried implementing the color os hal other than jgcaap from my own experience sultans hal is meh compared to color os hal, and OOS hal isn't much better than sultans (cm hal is horrible, tried it once and never again). Both Sultan and OOS are seriously lacking clarity and low-light performance. All my pictures are fuzzy unless there's a direct light source. Whereas with color os, I've taken pics of beachfires at night and there's little to no fuzzies, and colors are accurate. I even manage to capture the suns light rays. The other hals for whatever reason struggled with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omni has coloros but performance and battery life is so horrible. I really don't wanna come back to Android Marshmallow
Thanhtho96 said:
Omni has coloros but performance and battery life is so horrible. I really don't wanna come back to Android Marshmallow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can use the nougat build from the following link with color OS blobs, battery was the same as the other 14.1 roms, i didnt do any battery tests but it seemed the same.
http://dl.omnirom.org/find7op/
Hi, is it possible to extract the camera app that comes with the Xiaomi.eu ROM to install and run as an independent, standalone app without having to unlock the boot loader, root, magisk, etc.?!?
The xiaomi.eu ROM camera app comes with a lot of better features and in my opinion it produces better pictures than the camera app that comes with the official Xiaomi MIUI 10.2.26.0 PFAEUXM ROM.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Lars
Lars_TD2 said:
Hi, is it possible to extract the camera app that comes with the Xiaomi.eu ROM to install and run as an independent, standalone app without having to unlock the boot loader, root, magisk, etc.?!?
The xiaomi.eu ROM camera app comes with a lot of better features and in my opinion it produces better pictures than the camera app that comes with the official Xiaomi MIUI 10.2.26.0 PFAEUXM ROM.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Lars
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried using anx camera (google it and download. It is flashed by magisk and replaces the system camera, unless you disable or uninstall the module, at which case you revert back to the ststme camera. Better backup in twrp before just in case something goes wrong. I tried it in eu miui and it worked OK)
I'm just curious what features you like better
I prefer the stock camera app to that on the eu rom(though I'm running the dev build)
viper98 said:
I'm just curious what features you like better
I prefer the stock camera app to that on the eu rom(though I'm running the dev build)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't even know eu miui made any improvements to the camera in the first place...
viper98 said:
I'm just curious what features you like better
I prefer the stock camera app to that on the eu rom(though I'm running the dev build)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like the additional HDR modes (live and pro) as well as the dynamic pictures (aka live photos, I missed them since I had to forsake my Windows Mobile Lumia 950XL). Also, when comparing (pixel peeping) photos I prefer the ones coming out of the xiaomi.eu ROM's camera app. I think they just may have adjusted the JPG compression rate, but IMHO the xiaomi.eu ROM's camera produces pictures with more details, I've also compared them with pictures shot on a Mi 9 running the latest official global stable.
Lars_TD2 said:
I like the additional HDR modes (live and pro) as well as the dynamic pictures (aka live photos, I missed them since I had to forsake my Windows Mobile Lumia 950XL). Also, when comparing (pixel peeping) photos I prefer the ones coming out of the xiaomi.eu ROM's camera app. I think they just may have adjusted the JPG compression rate, but IMHO the xiaomi.eu ROM's camera produces pictures with more details, I've also compared them with pictures shot on a Mi 9 running the latest official global stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 :good:
I would love to get a non magisk camera for custom ROMs that can use all the lenses.
As far as I've seen, nothing on the play store can do it. There doesn't seem to be a standard even though practically all phones are adding multiple lenses.
So, from what I've understood is that the Samsung Camera app is "impossible" to use on an AOSP ROM, but I don't understand why. I've heard that there are some missing libraries, but they can't be ported over?
I really want to switch to an AOSP ROM like Lineage or HavocOS tbh, but the Open Camera and stock Camera app that comes with most ROMs just have unbearable quality. Low light isn't possible with them, you have to have brightly lit areas if you want to use it, HDR is a no-go, 240FPS or 960FPS is practically unheard of (from my experience). Is there no option alternative at all that has ok-ish quality or isn't trash?
PROGamer_199 said:
So, from what I've understood is that the Samsung Camera app is "impossible" to use on an AOSP ROM, but I don't understand why. I've heard that there are some missing libraries, but they can't be ported over?
I really want to switch to an AOSP ROM like Lineage or HavocOS tbh, but the Open Camera and stock Camera app that comes with most ROMs just have unbearable quality. Low light isn't possible with them, you have to have brightly lit areas if you want to use it, HDR is a no-go, 240FPS or 960FPS is practically unheard of (from my experience). Is there no option alternative at all that has ok-ish quality or isn't trash?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would require Samsung source code for the camera, which they will never release.