which is good?
which is best battery performance?
try alegen http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2693138 with vanir dorimanx kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2494756
also feel free to try some STweaks settings to balance performance with battery
reas0n said:
try alegen http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2693138 with vanir dorimanx kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2494756
also feel free to try some STweaks settings to balance performance with battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What else would you recommend?
freeze or delete some apps u don't use, like Google Now, Gmail and so on. that's all i do
reas0n said:
freeze or delete some apps u don't use, like Google Now, Gmail and so on. that's all i do
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you but you didnt understand
Which would you recommend another ROM?
alegen dont seem popular
erm... why it has to be popular? It's more stable than other roms, I tested everything. Alegen is the best for now.
okey
ı will try it
does alegen have turkish language?
because parandroid android is some english some turkish. so ı dont like PA
thanks for all your post
For me the best are AICP, MAHDI, ALEGEN in that order.
For me the best kernels are dorimanx or Render.
Currently im using(and building) AICP+DORIMANX
ALEGEN : Battery wise the best is alegen by far, also pretty damn stable(dont like settings organization and for me its not as smooth as AICP)
MAHDI : been great since forever, stable and fast, standard battery life.
AICP : for me the fastest by far( using dorimanx and interactive is awesome), great organization, tons of features.didnt had the chance to full discharge the phone. Right now im 11hrs usage 4:27 SoT 45% left
On my old Nexus 4 Paranoid (on JB) used to have good features for using other DPI settings (eg the Paranoid Phablet mode).
The current Paranoid 4.4 for LG G2 is lacking this features still.
Is there any other ROM with a good implementation for this ?
If you don't mind spending an hour or more, try out all roms. That's what I always do.
Sent from my HTC One
maerin said:
On my old Nexus 4 Paranoid (on JB) used to have good features for using other DPI settings (eg the Paranoid Phablet mode).
The current Paranoid 4.4 for LG G2 is lacking this features still.
Is there any other ROM with a good implementation for this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phablet ui and all hybrid settings where killed in the implementation of kitkat. So no. If you wanna change dpi you can do it on any rom, just changing the build.prop , some roms like vanir or AICP have a dpi changer( the same thing than changing from the file )
Related
Hi you guys, I just got my nexus 4 a week ago and rooted it right away.
I have been looking through the list of roms and I honestly don't know which is right for me.
I'm looking for a STABLE rom that knows how to balance battery life and power.
I don't care too much for customization, just a little would be nice (Nothing too overbearing).
It would be if the rom just knew what it was doing, and doesn't need me to constantly tweak things.
SO in all, just the BEST reccomnded rom and kernal combo.
Thank you in advance.
EDIT: I am currently running the stock rom, and franco r53 kernel
Slimbean. Stable, no bugs. As for kernels, they all are good. I like trinity and matrix
You will get a lot of different feedback what is the best. In the end it's a matter of taste.
atm I like AOKP with faux123 kernel. I heard the Minco Rom which comes with franco kernel should be very stable and smooth. And this rom and kernel where developed and supposed to work together:
"Welcome to the cross collaboration between myself & Francisco Franco.
We're proud to announce the first and ONLY Franco supported ROM. This ROM has been built from AOSP Jelly Bean."
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2061573
I don't know if you already know this "index"
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1975842
try some of the AOSP ROMs and see what's best for you. Since there is no best combo for everyone.
Try EVERYTHING! Every phone is different as is every person.
I could just go on about how I now swear to Trinity and AOKP, but you'll never really know the answer to your own question unless you experiment. The experimenting is the best part :3
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
I use ParanoidAndroid with Harsh's kernel.
Of course this is subjective, but having tried all kernels (except Matrix and Trinity) Harsh's one is the fastest and smoothest one with good battery life. I think other kernels have better battery life as they disable mpdecision, but this comes at the loss of smoothness which I personally prioritise.
As for the ROM, I haven't tried any since I flashed PA first. I don't think I'm ever going to even consider switching ROM's - that's how awesome it is :good:
But as everybody else is saying, you have to try everything yourself, not like that's a burden since everybody on XDA loves flashing stuff. It's fun!
Notorious544d said:
I use ParanoidAndroid with Harsh's kernel.
Of course this is subjective, but having tried all kernels (except Matrix and Trinity) Harsh's one is the fastest and smoothest one with good battery life. I think other kernels have better battery life as they disable mpdecision, but this comes at the loss of smoothness which I personally prioritise.
As for the ROM, I haven't tried any since I flashed PA first. I don't think I'm ever going to even consider switching ROM's - that's how awesome it is :good:
But as everybody else is saying, you have to try everything yourself, not like that's a burden since everybody on XDA loves flashing stuff. It's fun!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Want battery but worried about smooth? Install pimy my ROM and use a fee tweaks here and there ....
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
MINCO, really lite
Sorry i didn't make this clear earlier. But i care MUCH more about battery life than performance. I use my phone constantly, wether that means texting or reddit or games. I'm sure the nexus' hardware can more than keep up with these tasks but I'm getting relatively poor battery life.
I'm a gamer I use rasbeenjelly rom and motley b31 experimental. I get better battery life and performance than stock rom.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium HD app
I would try all the roms in the world. But i don't know a quick and effecitive way to back up all my apps. I used titanium backup ut many apps just weren't compatitible with the new custom rom. Tips?
newtoandroid30 said:
I would try all the roms in the world. But i don't know a quick and effecitive way to back up all my apps. I used titanium backup ut many apps just weren't compatitible with the new custom rom. Tips?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I've flashed dozens of ROMs between my Galaxy Nexus and N4, and have always used TiBu Pro without fail to quickly restore my apps. (then again, all my apps are from the Play store).
My favorite rom lately has been codefireXsr5
with Motley b31 kernel. Alternatively, Liquidsmooth 3.2 with Trinity 91g
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Factory stock rom and franco kernel.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Slimbean (stable, no bugs) and Harsh kernel (smoothest kernel I've tried so far and good battery life)
reaper000 said:
Really? I've flashed dozens of ROMs between my Galaxy Nexus and N4, and have always used TiBu Pro without fail to quickly restore my apps. (then again, all my apps are from the Play store).
My favorite rom lately has been codefireXsr5
with Motley b31 kernel. Alternatively, Liquidsmooth 3.2 with Trinity 91g
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have u tried SR7.2 with motley?
galaxys said:
Have u tried SR7.2 with motley?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I'm running right now! :good:
The reason I recc'd SR5 was because I found it faster than SR6. Heck, with Matr1x 5.5ocgpu487 (which itself is marginally faster than Matr1x6), I was scoring just over 20000 on AnTuTu with SR5.
I just benched SR7.2 with Motley b31oc1678, gave a pretty nice AnTuTu score of 20900, which is the same as what SR5 gave. So I'd give a thumbs up to this combo -- it also feels as good as SR5! (Running Trinity 91L at 1728 oc'd would undoubtedly bump that above 21000, but I couldn't tell the difference between running Trinity at 1728 and Motley at 1678 in daily use)
Do have to say that Rasbean Jelly and Trinity 91L was blinding fast, very noticeable in regular use; totally supports the >23000 AnTuTu score. (But I can't tell that big a difference between that combo and Liquidsmooth 3.2, which is unsupported by its 19000 benchmark. Yet another reason why I feel benchmarks are somewhat worthless when compared between entirely different ROMs)
It's all really subjective; objective tests like benchmarks are so confounded that only data mongers like me bother to use them :silly:
With Motleys I get 16000 at 1024
19500 at 1242 but then the increase is negligible. 22500 at 1642 for me.
I have been runing at 1024 and every game is perfect. Undervolted to 650 at 1024
Sent from my Mako using XDA Premium HD app
I just bought a G2 and I really love it. I want to know which features i lose if I flash CM11? Can i have stock LG camera? Can i have IR features, like quickremote? Does the knock-on works as in the stock rom?
Which kernel do you suggest for a better battery life?
Curtis7990 said:
I just bought a G2 and I really love it. I want to know which features i lose if I flash CM11? Can i have stock LG camera? Can i have IR features, like quickremote? Does the knock-on works as in the stock rom?
Which kernel do you suggest for a better battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been on stock + xposed since day one and absolutely love it. But all the above you mentioned are lost if you flash CM, which is a big part of why I'd probably never flash an AOSP ROM on this phone. Now, I do believe there are zip files for quick remote and stock LG camera for AOSP. to restore those features. And Knock on/off depends on the kernel being used I believe. But the gain/loss of flashing AOSP over what stock+Xposed offers....just doesnt even begin to be worth it, for me at least.
Knock on works better on cm than stock but knock off doesent work its worth it to me but I love stock android and no bloatware just a matter of what you like
Sent from my LG-VS980 using Tapatalk
Curtis7990 said:
I just bought a G2 and I really love it. I want to know which features i lose if I flash CM11? Can i have stock LG camera? Can i have IR features, like quickremote? Does the knock-on works as in the stock rom?
Which kernel do you suggest for a better battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am currently running omni.
There is a qremote installer here...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2596104
Lg camera here...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2540030
Knock on works. Knock off status bar works and is in settings.
Paek 5.2 kernel is built in and is excellent. BT can cause a crash or freeze while turning on and off.
If you want knock off on the launcher use xblast or g2 setting exposed and nova launcher and you can set it as the double tap settings.
You can also have themes, navbar resize and changes dynamic status bar tiles, active display, immersive mode.
Battery lasts about 12 hours on hard use. Today was 3 hrs of BT and streaming music 15 phone calls. A couple ROM downloads and I was at 60% before I tried paek 5.3 kernel and burned down to 15% in an hour.
Easily a day and is comparable to stock.
Hope that helps
Sent from my OMNI supported VS980.
Mikkey81 said:
I am currently running omni.
There is a qremote installer here...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2596104
Lg camera here...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2540030
Knock on works. Knock off status bar works and is in settings.
Paek 5.2 kernel is built in and is excellent. BT can cause a crash or freeze while turning on and off.
If you want knock off on the launcher use xblast or g2 setting exposed and nova launcher and you can set it as the double tap settings.
You can also have themes, navbar resize and changes dynamic status bar tiles, active display, immersive mode.
Battery lasts about 12 hours on hard use. Today was 3 hrs of BT and streaming music 15 phone calls. A couple ROM downloads and I was at 60% before I tried paek 5.3 kernel and burned down to 15% in an hour.
Easily a day and is comparable to stock.
Hope that helps
Sent from my OMNI supported VS980.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much, this is what I was looking for!
So you suggest Omni over CM?
I thought that with a custom kernel, battery life would be better than stock, maybe with a bit of unvervolt
I suggest Paranoid Android, Omni, Nameless and Mahdi. Those are the most stable.. At least to me.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk
Unfortunately though, you won't be able to use certain games with cm11. Touch doesn't seem to be working well.
Sent from my g2 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Undervolt has been causing a lot of SOD's, so careful. I can't in good conscience tell you which ROM to use. I just switched over to gr33nd3vils cm for today. I'm trying to test out that PAEK 5.3 with no luck on battery life. OMNI has been pretty solid. Just bluetooth issues locking her down every now and then on my end.
So a good compromise is root+xposed+kernel. I'm just looking for a better battery life, so maybe a good kernel and greenify/titanium can help me
Curtis7990 said:
So a good compromise is root+xposed+kernel. I'm just looking for a better battery life, so maybe a good kernel and greenify/titanium can help me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give CloudyFlex a spin. I don't believe you will be disappointed.
Sent from my g2 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Curtis7990 said:
So a good compromise is root+xposed+kernel. I'm just looking for a better battery life, so maybe a good kernel and greenify/titanium can help me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd go with that.
Kernels have been interesting with stock.
Dorimax Kernel and Furnace I think our our only stock kernels but seriously the stock kernel is pretty clean. Good battery life. I usually run it on interactive but that's just my preference with a 2048 buffer size and noop.
I just installed stock cause I'm going out of town for work this week.
Found the most debloated thing I could and threw down bsleds g2 xposed from the market, xblast from xposed, and google launcher so everything is nice and smooth.
A little bit of everything here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2591077
I haven't seen that Cloudy whatmacalllit. <A post back]You can bet I'm gonna go try it.
Hi, which rom is the best for performance on the Note 3?
moustafasadek11 said:
Hi, which rom is the best for performance on the Note 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on individual usage. Im currently inter-swtiching on Stock S5 port ROM by Jamal and g00h. The ROM is fast and stable.
moustafasadek11 said:
Hi, which rom is the best for performance on the Note 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you want TouchWiz based and have all Samsung features? Do you want AOSP based like CM etc?
If you want to game etc, then look at changing kernels and tweaking you can read about kernel tweaking HERE - No one can tell you which is the best for "performance" as no one has any idea what you use your device for..
radicalisto said:
Do you want TouchWiz based and have all Samsung features? Do you want AOSP based like CM etc?
If you want to game etc, then look at changing kernels and tweaking you can read about kernel tweaking HERE - No one can tell you which is the best for "performance" as no one has any idea what you use your device for..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I honestly really don't mind either having samsung stock or cm, just one that will give best performance, but yeah I have been through like 10 different custom roms and each one has their issues, like nfc issue, battery issue, etc.
Also how do people get 50,000+ on antutu with the same n9005 device?
S5 port by gooh and C-Rom are my personal preference.
Sent from my SM-G900S using XDA Free mobile app
moustafasadek11 said:
I honestly really don't mind either having samsung stock or cm, just one that will give best performance, but yeah I have been through like 10 different custom roms and each one has their issues, like nfc issue, battery issue, etc.
Also how do people get 50,000+ on antutu with the same n9005 device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu (version 5 is reporting incorrectly so people who think they are getting 50-60K actually are not.. lol) means nothing, don't even bother. - In regards to ROM battery isn't the ROM itself really, it'st the kernel. Use a custom kernel and have a look at how to tweak it for better battery performance.
radicalisto said:
Antutu (version 5 is reporting incorrectly so people who think they are getting 50-60K actually are not.. lol) means nothing, don't even bother. - In regards to ROM battery isn't the ROM itself really, it'st the kernel. Use a custom kernel and have a look at how to tweak it for better battery performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! Yeah I'm currently on Jamal's S5 port for Note 3 and I was on Lean Kernel and experienced a bit of battery drain, but on Ultimate Kernel V72 I get better performance and better battery life!
Lean Kernel Battery after 12hrs major usage: 35%
Ultimate Kernel V72 after 12hrs major usage: 60%
Amitds360 said:
S5 port by gooh and C-Rom are my personal preference.
Sent from my SM-G900S using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm currently on Jamal's S5 port! It is amazing. I'm not on C-rom cause it hasn't been updated in a while (meaning minor bugs and performance fixes are still present).
tweaked rom
i find the tweaked rom by gooh most interesting with performance and my second option is echoe rom
Hi, i had use some ROM in the past like Cyanogenmod(GearCM) and Paranoid Android, but Cyanogenmod have a really poor battery life, and Paranoid Android have some annoying bug, i'm looking suggestion for a stable rom with good battery life for daily use
Thanks
Every TW based rom.
zeulb said:
Hi, i had use some ROM in the past like Cyanogenmod(GearCM) and Paranoid Android, but Cyanogenmod have a really poor battery life, and Paranoid Android have some annoying bug, i'm looking suggestion for a stable rom with good battery life for daily use
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi ,
I like Omega Rom , fast , stable...good battery life ( depending in your settings)
You must be Kidding
So far by my BEST knowledge (Maybe I know a little or wrong),
there's NOTHING called as MOST STABLE ROM. It is your choice of flavors: PERFORMANCE VS FEATURES VS BATTERY LIFE etc.
WANAM, OMEGA, ECHOE, AOSB and a lot of stable ROMs are out there that you can use as a daily driver. Developers are working hard to give you a customized taste of your choice to the Android.
izephyr said:
So far by my BEST knowledge (Maybe I know a little or wrong),
there's NOTHING called as MOST STABLE ROM. It is your choice of flavors: PERFORMANCE VS FEATURES VS BATTERY LIFE etc.
WANAM, OMEGA, ECHOE, AOSB and a lot of stable ROMs are out there that you can use as a daily driver. Developers are working hard to give you a customized taste of your choice to the Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Post of the day :highfive:
To all the devs.
First off, would like to compliment you on the great work you do, and putting in all the tme and effort for developing your roms.
I would please like to request, if you are interested, to develop a PURE AOSP ROM, either kitkat or lollipop, like you get on stock Nexus.
I think a lot of people would be interested in experiencing the stock Nexus look and feel.
I am adding a poll, so for all those interested please vote.
i can't see the point at all .......
you have CM11 (the last nightly is good ) ......and then CM12 .
Cyanogenmod is already "simple" and enought "pure" with lots of interestings things , really not difficult to understand why this rom work...........and very ergonomic !!!
CM is not like others customs with all theirs "frills" like Pie ,omniswitch ,exotics personalizations ......more or less useless for a standard use .
=> with that , i really don't think at all that a dev want to "spend energy" to make a "poor" AOSP pure ... and too many peoples are really not interrested by this sort of rom
Loulou-13 said:
i can't see the point at all .......
you have CM11 (the last nightly is good ) ......and then CM12 .
Cyanogenmod is already "simple" and enought "pure" with lots of interestings things , really not difficult to understand why this rom work...........and very ergonomic !!!
CM is not like others customs with all theirs "frills" like Pie ,omniswitch ,exotics personalizations ......more or less useless for a standard use .
=> with that , i really don't think at all that a dev want to "spend energy" to make a "poor" AOSP pure ... and too many peoples are really not interrested by this sort of rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont know why but has just always interested me. And Im too uneducated and dont have the resources to build myself. Pure aosp has just look interesting to me.
I second this , i would love to see a pure AOSP rom.
jnvdh06 said:
To all the devs.
First off, would like to compliment you on the great work you do, and putting in all the tme and effort for developing your roms.
I would please like to request, if you are interested, to develop a PURE AOSP ROM, either kitkat or lollipop, like you get on stock Nexus.
I think a lot of people would be interested in experiencing the stock Nexus look and feel.
I am adding a poll, so for all those interested please vote.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A pure AOSP is a pain in the ass ( u have to pick to many patch from caf), a CAF version will be easy or CAF based too like DU, SLIM
Miccia said:
A pure AOSP is a pain in the ass ( u have to pick to many patch from caf), a CAF version will be easy or CAF based too like DU, SLIM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
personally think it would be worth it though to truly use android at its purest (no bloat, slowdowns or crap). and people who do want some customisations on this rom the xposed framework is available to lollipop now.
To be honest I prefer TW to AOSP am I the only one?
You_KS said:
To be honest I prefer TW to AOSP am I the only one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO. I love twiz too, as it gives me best gaming performance and battery life.
sasank360 said:
NO. I love twiz too, as it gives me best gaming performance and battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought TouchWiz is a "heavy" ROM compared to CM. How does it give performance for gaming?
Sent from my GT-I9195 using XDA Free mobile app
TiTAN-O-One said:
I thought TouchWiz is a "heavy" ROM compared to CM. How does it give performance for gaming?
Sent from my GT-I9195 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that is the case atleast on my s4 mini. The thing is i do not always run my s4 mini @ full 1.7 ghz
While gaming on stock rom i set cpu @ 1.3 or 1.2 ghz and plays it just fine. I play subway surfers, dead trigger 2 and asphalt 8.
All run smoothly @ low graphix settings. But on custom roms like cm I have to set cpu @ 1.4-1.5 GHz for same fluidity and
obviously battery drains a little quicker.
sasank360 said:
Well, that is the case atleast on my s4 mini. The thing is i do not always run my s4 mini @ full 1.7 ghz
While gaming on stock rom i set cpu @ 1.3 or 1.2 ghz and plays it just fine. I play subway surfers, dead trigger 2 and asphalt 8.
All run smoothly @ low graphix settings. But on custom roms like cm I have to set cpu @ 1.4-1.5 GHz for same fluidity and
obviously battery drains a little quicker.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rly? I played Subway Surfers and Asphalt 8 (lowest graphix) @ 810mhz UV and its rly smooth as heck on RR Lollipop
On stock ROM I noticed battery drain and heating issues compared to cusroms
Sent from my GT-I9195 using XDA Free mobile app