Database Users

[NEW BOUNTIES] Unlocked ATT Atrix project ideas

Most of us with ATT phones pretty thrilled by the recent turn of events. But the journey is just beginning, and there is a lot of work ahead. As much as I'm sure we all want to throw a few bucks to the ATT/Moto employee who leaked, it's probably better for their job security that we can't
It's my opinion that the amount of work that's been done so far pales compared to what's ahead. Many exciting things are possible, but most will take days, weeks or months of work. A few useful projects I can think of include:
Porting AOSP trees (CM7?) for Atrix
Debug kernels with USB or 3.5mm serial uart
Newer (.36? .38?) kernels with various tweaks
Overclock kernels or overclock modules that work safely
A rebased webtop: Ubuntu 10.10 or 11.04, or ... Gentoo?
An AOSP-based ROM that leaves all webtop functionality intact.
(I'm saving my donation money for the last one, +extra$ if the front camera is v4l accessible from webtop. PM Sogarth or myself, if interested in webtop-related dev)
Those are just a few off the top of my head... sky's the limit! Lots of nifty hacks with HDMI/Webtop/Lapdock are possible... Pick your pet project, start a thread, collect names and guaranteed minimum donations, keep a google spreadsheet, do what it takes. Or if you're a dev, float your ideas...
I'd really like to encourage collective development. In many cases projects are solo efforts, but they don't have to be. I don't do it for the money and collaboration is more fun for me than competition. It makes me sad when code is not public and other people can't extend or port a work. But competition for bounties can discourage this openness, and I think that's a pity. I feel best dev work comes from a love of creativity, pushing limits by making useful things that were never possible before ...not for money or celebrity.
So I think, if a project was a cooperative work, perhaps developers could agree and shoot a mail to the 'bounty' coordinator indicating who is doing what work, so that if it succeeds, such bounties could be shared between a team.
And last but not least... Unless a dev needs custom hardware or a phone...
I encourage you to ONLY donate once a project is complete!!
I've got to take 3 weeks off to take care of personal things, but am hopeful to see what the state of AT&T Atrix is like on XDA when I get back =)
PS. Let me clarify: I am not starting any bounties! Please do not PM with how much you would pay for x.y.z. Please do PM if you want to dig deep into webtop internals. As I am interested in working on Atrix still, there could be a conflict of interest if I organized anything. Please, if you believe in a project, find like-minded people and organize a bounty thread yourselves!

I think this is a great idea!

Great idea
but you forgot MiUI!!

Daniel_GB said:
Great idea
but you forgot MiUI!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for MIUI
actually the MIUI team states that they will support most of the devices CM support, if CM doesnt support a device the MIUI team wouldnt even touch that with a pole
it might be a better idea donating a few machines + a few bucks directly to CM and get the ball rolling there instead of "porting"

I think we need a bounty for someone who can unlock the bootloader for international versions
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

lsxrx7 said:
+1 for MIUI
actually the MIUI team states that they will support most of the devices CM support, if CM doesnt support a device the MIUI team wouldnt even touch that with a pole
it might be a better idea donating a few machines + a few bucks directly to CM and get the ball rolling there instead of "porting"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. I thought we were all already planning on sending them a service or two though?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App

IrshaadH said:
I think we need a bounty for someone who can unlock the bootloader for international versions
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The unsung hero is the unknown source who gave us a signed unlockable BL. Unless you can find a leak from a carrier or Moto connection, who has similarly signed unlockable BL for international versions, good luck. As far as I know no one has come close to unlocking the Atrix boot signature chain. It may be possible, but it probably isn't, and it hardly seems like anyone is trying. I'd really like to clarify we didn't do anything besides notice this was possible, and then package things up after we got a lucky leak. It was probably coming anyway, but someone out there wanted to help us early =)
That said, a bounty for kexec working on international Atrix is not a bad idea.

Would be great if everything will work fine expecially Ubuntu.
I never needed it but I think now it is about time!

anyone here a dev / got connection with any devs in CM ?
whats the donation process ? do we just ship them a phone a case of beers ?

I want to help with $$$ for all the work. I have a Telcel Atrix in Mexico and would like to help devs. I have Paypal.
Enviado desde mi Motorola Atrix™ usando Tapatalk

IrshaadH said:
I think we need a bounty for someone who can unlock the bootloader for international versions
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'd have to pay it to Motorola.

I would donate for a CM7 rom

HDMI mirroring port from Droid X 2 please!

andy2na said:
HDMI mirroring port from Droid X 2 please!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ditto 10char

ubuntu on webtop would be huge along with a fully functional aosp gingerbread release.

lsxrx7 said:
+1 for MIUI
actually the MIUI team states that they will support most of the devices CM support, if CM doesnt support a device the MIUI team wouldnt even touch that with a pole
it might be a better idea donating a few machines + a few bucks directly to CM and get the ball rolling there instead of "porting"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because MIUI is a rip of CM7 with crappy "customizations."
They don't touch non-CM7 phones because they can't; they don't have the skill to build the full ROM themselves.
lsxrx7 said:
anyone here a dev / got connection with any devs in CM ?
whats the donation process ? do we just ship them a phone a case of beers ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM7 port is being actively worked on by the FreeMyMoto team.

Ririal said:
CM7 port is being actively worked on by the FreeMyMoto team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I presume they're aware of the recent happenings with the bootloader? So they can get the correct kernel too?

NoNameAtAll said:
I presume they're aware of the recent happenings with the bootloader? So they can get the correct kernel too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...G0xwjdnvH24V7bytg&sig2=JUzud0fofwcjV1YTJuC6Mg

Do you need a source code to produce a custom kernel?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

IrshaadH said:
I think we need a bounty for someone who can unlock the bootloader for international versions
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Stop being so greedy, u Americans have an unlocked BL. Now its our turn. I really dislike this post eval. You act like the only Atrix that needs to be hacked is the att version....
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Playground ICS [New Era]

Bug Tracker
Playground ICS
I would like to take a moment and humbly thank AllDroid.org for supporting my campaign to keep Android development moving forward as a community. We are a single voice reminding everyone that as much as we are Android, Android is us.​

Yeah, still downloading...

Hey man. Every one I've downloaded the past couple of days gives me the same sideload error lol

Chyrux said:
Hey man. Every one I've downloaded the past couple of days gives me the same sideload error lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it helps, I don't think we will have quite as many of those issues anymore.

Gotcha good stuff. What causes the error?

Chyrux said:
Gotcha good stuff. What causes the error?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
40% not using proper neutral text editors on all the install scripts, 20% the mistake of trying to make the built universal, and another 20% bad file combinations.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

So when i install the base, I boot to the unlock screen and cannot get the screen to unlock due to screen inaccuracy. When I try to flash the port I receive an error and the installation aborts.

So, now that ICS has been released to AOSP, do you think these small bugs will be worked out?

fireshaper said:
So, now that ICS has been released to AOSP, do you think these small bugs will be worked out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please read post 1, paragraph 1.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

I guess I'm confused as well... AOSP was released and that is not the entire source?

htowngator said:
I guess I'm confused as well... AOSP was released and that is not the entire source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The nexus source was released. In Git terms, it is just one branch.
And apparently I am going to have disappearing ink...(meaning you all get to miss my witty responses to the random comments)
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

This is a development thread. We know about source. We know what was and wasn't released. This is not a place for general questions or chit-chat. If you have something to contribute, please post. If not, hit the thanks button, pull up a chair, and wait with the rest of us.

mrkite38 said:
This is a development thread. We know about source. We know what was and wasn't released. This is not a place for general questions or chit-chat. If you have something to contribute, please post. If not, hit the thanks button, pull up a chair, and wait with the rest of us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*smack* yeah, I am still trying to put together a frankenstein build process for the mecha. Right now it is a little ugly, but it is starting to make sense.
...and another case of dew gives its life to the cause...
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
kite edit: well, it wasn't aimed at you, obviously

Not sure if I know what I am doing, but when the poop hits the propeller, I have never had to build source that wasn't already at least somewhat modified for my device.
I got all the proprietary stuff, the countless extra common additions, and now it seems I have to go find all the hardware build parts missing because all we got was a nexus layout and dashed hopes of much more.
It may or may not be realistic to just merge in the missing parts, but at least it is a good start. Everything is configured to work, it just wants some stuff I am still downloading.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

I downloaded and built ICS today. However, it is based on a 3.0 kernel and HTC hasn't released the source for that yet. It would make things go a lot faster if they release it soon.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

chuckbeasley said:
I downloaded and built ICS today. However, it is based on a 3.0 kernel and HTC hasn't released the source for that yet. It would make things go a lot faster if they release it soon.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is your build functional
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

I am starting a fund to get a Nexus S and port directly from the device. After looking over this source, that seems to be more realistic than attempting to rewrite the entire thing.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

c2thej said:
Is your build functional
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever built android from source? Do you know what we have? Do you know what you're asking?
Development. I think if this guy had built something that ran he'd mention it.

mrkite38 said:
Have you ever built android from source? Do you know what we have? Do you know what you're asking?
Development. I think if this guy had built something that ran he'd mention it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will post every detail I can, but I will admit a lot of it is currently mixed in with DHD and Dinc, as we have been working as one team instead of separate devices. I will make a point to link up what has been going on soon. That was overlooked on my part.
The builds in the first post are functional, but the version being built from source should not and will not be a [email protected]$$ rip -off of another device. That is costing time...
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

Ffej5647 said:
oh wow! look at you being a cool forum mod on the internet! You show your authority foo!
A lot of people say they did something and oh yeah i rooted the inc...oh yeah where is the method...ummmm tell you in a week or so just making sure i can release it...couple days later it was all fake. It mostly always is. If people make claims they should show proof but you believe everything everyone says you amazing mod you.
ps: if someone makes a dumb comment ignore it. bc your a mod doesnt mean you can shoot off dumb*** comments, not everyone is as smart as you im sorry to say it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I do not always agree with the Mods on this forum, I have been in contact with the one keeping a watch over this forum and he has a good understanding of what is and isnt relevant. He responded to make a valid point because a lot of the posts that have been removed are the direct result of not reading the first post. There have been MANY posts throughout the entire site pushing for releases only days after the initial release of a partial source. I think it is best you keep in mind, that nothing he said is directly rude unless you choose to read it that way.
To read up on a lot of the details of what is going on, a lot of the work is better documented http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1343361

[Q] Request Support d2 (US Variants)

Being one of the more widely used devices as well as my personal device (until note 3) OmniROM is EXACTLY what we need. If anyone can maintain for these devices it would be fantastic. Can't wait to try this out on my Manta.

I concur.

I've been trying but have been getting errors. The d2 community is big, we'll get it soon enough.
Just because one is anonymous doesn't mean that one has privacy.

jamcar said:
I've been trying but have been getting errors. The d2 community is , we'll get it soon enough.
Just because is anonymous doesn't mean that has privacy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a build compiled. Hopefully I can get my d2att to boot soon

Smasher816 said:
I got a build compiled. Hopefully I can get my d2att to boot soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers! Having it on the d2att model should be a (or couple) steps away from the d2tmo

Awesome. Now I just need someone for d2spr lol
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

jkgao said:
Cheers! Having it on the d2att model should be a (or couple) steps away from the d2tmo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahem indeed

Only if I knew how to port, I'd make a d2vzw build but I'd screw it up...

Cm 13 and M based ROM Discussion

I would like to just set up a thread for any word on CM13 and or any work on M based ROMs for the TMO N4. I did not see one so if there is I apologize and will take it down.
Cm13 is available unofficially for the international verison which I did flash and had bad things happen. I have heard no talk of when we are to expect it for TMO. So hopefully we can remain updated by more informed members of the XDA community.
Im dying to get a feel for it and heard the Cyanogen Team put some nice work into this as they always do.

mattdiehl83 said:
I would like to just set up a thread for any word on CM13 and or any work on M based ROMs for the TMO N4. I did not see one so if there is I apologize and will take it down.
Cm13 is available unofficially for the international verison which I did flash and had bad things happen. I have heard no talk of when we are to expect it for TMO. So hopefully we can remain updated by more informed members of the XDA community.
Im dying to get a feel for it and heard the Cyanogen Team put some nice work into this as they always do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unofficially, there is no talk about when it will be released is because it doesn't work on our device yet. There are developers working on it as we speak, but they don't like being asked an ETA. It'll be ready when it's ready. On the flip side, simply discussing what features we'd like to see in Android M could be a nice thread to have. Devs could look here for that if they do choose and see what cherry picks people want.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

You need a doctor not CM13

aaldiar said:
Unofficially, there is no talk about when it will be released is because it doesn't work on our device yet. There are developers working on it as we speak, but they don't like being asked an ETA. It'll be ready when it's ready. On the flip side, simply discussing what features we'd like to see in Android M could be a nice thread to have. Devs could look here for that if they do choose and see what cherry picks people want.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats a good idea. And i wasnt exactly asking a eta so much....we all know how they hate that...lol. But I did just see a M system dump as well as a few posts of a member on the international side who is currently working on a TMO version. I believe he has developed some working blobs but has a bit to go.
As for features, i really dont know why we dont have multi window support for CM yet. Ive asked but never got a real answer as to why they always leave it out. For the TMO version id love to see working s-pen. But i hear they did find a way to get wifi calling to work so thats great news if true.

ecrudragon said:
You need a doctor not CM13
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TRUTH!!!!

mattdiehl83 said:
Thats a good idea. And i wasnt exactly asking a eta so much....we all know how they hate that...lol. But I did just see a M system dump as well as a few posts of a member on the international side who is currently working on a TMO version. I believe he has developed some working blobs but has a bit to go.
As for features, i really dont know why we dont have multi window support for CM yet. Ive asked but never got a real answer as to why they always leave it out. For the TMO version id love to see working s-pen. But i hear they did find a way to get wifi calling to work so thats great news if true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm aware you aren't, but if it's not mentioned than all the sudden the thread will get spammed with it.
As far as multi-window? CM/Slim 12.1 has something of the sort. But true multi-window is a TW only feature add it is proprietary drivers and tough to get source code on.
As long as I have my battery bar, sliding on status bar for brightness, and CM theme support, I'll be a happy little clam. The rest is just gravy. Would be awesome to have fingerprint support on an AOSP based ROM.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Cm13 ROM has been booted for tmo, not s xx hybrid but there are issues with the baseband

Its coming guys. @ZION959 has a bootable cm13 with data and everything going for t-mobile. He posted in the snapdragon note 4 thread for cm13. hasn't posted it yet to my knowledge but its a matter of time.:good:
Sidenote: holy hell i need to change my signature. havent posted in forever haha

I did see that data is now a function on the INT version of CM13. I did read that finger print is actually proposed to make it. Unsure on the legitness of that one. Im super excited to see progress now. Im just surprised that with M sources released that we see no ROMs built. I have actually attempted sitting down and doing so building. Man is it time consuming. I just took frames from a open project and did some bsic things and was frustrated. Thanks to all the people who take their time to build these things. :good:

_INSPIREed said:
Its coming guys. @ZION959 has a bootable cm13 with data and everything going for t-mobile. He posted in the snapdragon note 4 thread for cm13. hasn't posted it yet to my knowledge but its a matter of time.:good:
Sidenote: holy hell i need to change my signature. havent posted in forever haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think my signature still says i get a woody over Roms or something....lol

So from what I think i am seeing over in the INTL side is that support for the N4 cm13 has no devs. Wondering if thats true. Anyone have any word on this?

mattdiehl83 said:
So from what I think i am seeing over in the INTL side is that support for the N4 cm13 has no devs. Wondering if thats true. Anyone have any word on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could be too early to tell. I would imagine devs don't want to be bothered with questions on ETA when things don't work. There's no real way of telling exactly when you make a breakthrough in coding.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

aaldiar said:
Could be too early to tell. I would imagine devs don't want to be bothered with questions on ETA when things don't work. There's no real way of telling exactly when you make a breakthrough in coding.
Seems we may have a breakthrough. Fingers crossed.
Also, can someone withone with understanding of the process of building roms from a source like Marshmallow tell me something? If there is a system dump, say from Nexus, for M how come it is so hard to turn that into a runnable version for samsung? I know the systems are totally different and we have the TW systems, but as a AOSP source I always believed that turning that around from the code was the reason the codes were released. I started to see that was very wrong back when L hit and the massive bs these devs went thru with that. So is there a easy way to explain the process and why it is so difficult to do for us?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

mattdiehl83 said:
aaldiar said:
Could be too early to tell. I would imagine devs don't want to be bothered with questions on ETA when things don't work. There's no real way of telling exactly when you make a breakthrough in coding.
Seems we may have a breakthrough. Fingers crossed.
Also, can someone withone with understanding of the process of building roms from a source like Marshmallow tell me something? If there is a system dump, say from Nexus, for M how come it is so hard to turn that into a runnable version for samsung? I know the systems are totally different and we have the TW systems, but as a AOSP source I always believed that turning that around from the code was the reason the codes were released. I started to see that was very wrong back when L hit and the massive bs these devs went thru with that. So is there a easy way to explain the process and why it is so difficult to do for us?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not a coder, but I have an understanding of how this works a little. The biggest reason is hardware differences and getting the coding right to match the software (drivers) to the hardware. With AOSP, the devs have to write coding from scratch for a 'port' from a system dump from another phone. Especially one that's a different brand entirely.
That is about the best I can think to explain it. If I am totally off bass there, a dev could come in and snack me around for spreading misinformation. [emoji19]
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Kernel

As many of you know, I had a kernel named Singularity. I chose to cease development. As users still want the kernel, I am looking for someone to take over. If you are interested PM and if I decide your serious Ill give you the source

I would love it if someone would take this over! I don't know Jack about coding but have been very happy with the kernel. Maybe one of the kernel devs could build it as a side project to their own or at least go through the code and give some feedback as to the viability of adopting it...
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app

apophis9283 said:
As many of you know, I had a kernel named Singularity. I chose to cease development. As users still want the kernel, I am looking for someone to take over. If you are interested PM and if I decide your serious Ill give you the source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not just release the source? I'm sure someone will take over or put the features into another kernel.

Meowdib said:
Why not just release the source? I'm sure someone will take over or put the features into another kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if its on XDA, then sourse is released.

simms22 said:
if its on XDA, then sourse is released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its not on xda anymore and the source isn't either.
I wish i had the time and ingenuity to take it.
But I don't.
If I were to do it updates would be inconsistent and I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to keep it up nearly as well as apophis did.
But thank you @apophis9283 for the offer to allow someone to take over

klabit87 said:
its not on xda anymore and the source isn't either.
I wish i had the time and ingenuity to take it.
But I don't.
If I were to do it updates would be inconsistent and I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to keep it up nearly as well as apophis did.
But thank you @apophis9283 for the offer to allow someone to take over
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really wish I could keep the kernel alive. I put 4 years into XDA with various projects. Being burnt out doesnt even begin to describe how I feel. I promise if I change my mind down the road Ill let everyone know

apophis9283 said:
I really wish I could keep the kernel alive. I put 4 years into XDA with various projects. Being burnt out doesnt even begin to describe how I feel. I promise if I change my mind down the road Ill let everyone know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edited because I didn't fully read the main post.

deleted

I just added cpuquiet to my source. I am going to test it and just post source here for anyone who wants it. I dont need one person to carry on the kernel, everyone can have access and it will go on that way. Have fun.
EDIT: https://gitlab.com/apophis9283/Singularity

apophis9283 said:
I just added cpuquiet to my source. I am going to test it and just post source here for anyone who wants it. I dont need one person to carry on the kernel, everyone can have access and it will go on that way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will be so awesome and appreciated!
I know I will be building it myself every now and then when I have time.
Thanks again!

klabit87 said:
That will be so awesome and appreciated!
I know I will be building it myself every now and then when I have time.
Thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a problem. Didnt want to be an ass. I still add things every now and then. So everyone is welcome to check back now and then. I just felt that this wasnt just my work, its the work of many. Many should be able to enjoy it.

apophis9283 said:
Not a problem. Didnt want to be an ass. I still add things every now and then. So everyone is welcome to check back now and then. I just felt that this wasnt just my work, its the work of many. Many should be able to enjoy it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your work. You were one of the most involved, and concerned devs I've encountered in what I call the "neo-XDA" era. I'm sad to hear about this, but am glad you are putting yourself first. Enjoy your time away.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

mexiken said:
Thank you for your work. You were one of the most involved, and concerned devs I've encountered in what I call the "neo-XDA" era. I'm sad to hear about this, but am glad you are putting yourself first. Enjoy your time away.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume you are talking about iamtheonetheycallneo?

apophis9283 said:
I assume you are talking about iamtheonetheycallneo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sir. You and uh, I think it was Yoinx that ran the Singularity thread, right???? You guys worked really hard to get it up and running for us low binned guys.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

mexiken said:
No sir. You and uh, I think it was Yoinx that ran the Singularity thread, right???? You guys worked really hard to get it up and running for us low binned guys.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that was Yoinx. Hes a great guy, I actually didnt know that some phones had a lower bin. This was my first kernel. You said neo-era. I thought you were talking about neo the developer who is now a mod. He actually tought me about android. Neo has been an amazing friend for almost 4 years. I stand by Yoinx. Great guy and highly intelligent. He was the one who taught me about kernels.

I will be updated the kernel soon. This in no way means I want to do it for the masses. Just stuff I'm doing for myself but you have my source and you can compile it yourself.

apophis9283 said:
I will be updated the kernel soon. This in no way means I want to do it for the masses. Just stuff I'm doing for myself but you have my source and you can compile it yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sad to hear that you're burned out... But Glad that you're embracing what open source is about.

Yoinx said:
Sad to hear that you're burned out... But Glad that you're embracing what open source is about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Loving the app

Im trying to get the state helper stuff along with the new msm limiter stuff. Could be a minute

apophis9283 said:
Im trying to get the state helper stuff along with the new msm limiter stuff. Could be a minute
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My fork's already supporting it app-side, so that's done. I managed to knock out getting that uploaded during a port call.