Those of you who are running CM 10.1.3 stable or nightlys can you post scores of benchmarks such as antutu ver 3.3.2 - 3.5, quadrant, 3dmark, androbench?
Want to compare scores from CM 10.1.3 with stock version 2.1.1 to see if there is any major improvement or difference. Also is battery life better, the same or worse comparing CM 10.1.3 to stock?
Also with CM 10.1.3 can you hide navigation buttons to make everything full screen when playing a game or web browsing? can you put the status bar on bottom with navigation buttons so nothing is on top? just curious...
Thank you!
I'm interested to hear this as well.
I have 10.1.3 but have not installed it.
Still running 10.1 6/30 emmc build. no complaints, but if 10.1.3 is an improvement...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hopefully you can see this.
Default resolution
Hot plug, Deadline, purge assets, dithering set to default, 16bit transparency.
With stock Nook ROM 2.1.1 I think my best was around 2100.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk 4
CM 10.1.3
CM 10.1.3
Only preference changes where 16bit transparency and 'Allow purging of assets'.
These tests where run after the Nook was on for alitlte while and being used for a bit.
antutu
quadrant
felacio said:
Hopefully you can see this.
Default resolution
Hot plug, Deadline, purge assets, dithering set to default, 16bit transparency.
With stock Nook ROM 2.1.1 I think my best was around 2100.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got 3068 running stock.
sent by Nook HD+ using tapatalk
move_over said:
Got 3068 running stock.
sent by Nook HD+ using tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3038 vs 3068 is REALLY splitting hairs.
Did you turn on GPU Rendering to do that?
felacio said:
Did you turn on GPU Rendering to do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is and where is that ?
So far im pretty happy with how my Nook runs (but its the only tablet ive used and owned) but if there are ways to make it run smother, id like to give it a shot.
Settings > developer options > force GPU rendering.
It forces the gpu to render 2D objects as opposed to the cpu doing it. (I'm assuming)
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
to my knowledge you can't access those settings on stock nook but i would love to be able to. for me i got 2985 running 2.1.1
smatticus said:
to my knowledge you can't access those settings on stock nook but i would love to be able to. for me i got 2985 running 2.1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right, only with CM roms can you do that. Be nice to have more options like that on stock. But I'm pretty satisfied with stock so far, with root and 3rd party app install enabled.
sent by Nook HD+ using tapatalk
Thanks guys for the shots to compare stock 2.1.1 with!
I have to admit my new nook hd+ manufactured I assume not to long ago, has been pretty dam smooth and snappy and no lag what so ever!
In androbench I get some amazing scores since I have a new off the press Toshiba 16gb chip inside. Fast random reads and writes! This helps the nook hd tremendously. Also I use novo launcher, wifi set to sleep after stock 15 minute time frame although need an app to adjust that on stock, everything tweaked as far as I can do in stock and pretty dam good for a 9 inch 1920x1200 tablet with a 6000mah battery that so far after 3-4 full discharges and charges I got 7 hours and 30 minutes screen time using it off and on for 3 days and 17 hours (screen little less than half brightness). Must have a good battery inside as well.
Cannot beat the price for 149.00 dollars plus tax. Also it gets a better 3d score using the PowerVR SGX 544 gpu in quadrant at the native resolution than other tablets with high res screens. Also it beats a Nexus 7 1st generation and the Sero 7 in the 3dmark benchmark on extreme preset (at higher res). Not bad!
Is there a way to tell the manufacturer/details of the 16 GB internal memory? I have already purchased 2 refurb HD+'s and have a 3rd on order. My kids love 'em (and I do too)!
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
I'm running 10.1 6/30 build and got quadrant score of 2600
Download Vellamo benchmark from Google Play, you can side swipe the screens and menus in program, one of the screens shows your device in purple and system information and you click or touch that and scroll down the system info and you'll see brand name and revision code of your built in storage.
mgoblue62 said:
Is there a way to tell the manufacturer/details of the 16 GB internal memory? I have already purchased 2 refurb HD+'s and have a 3rd on order. My kids love 'em (and I do too)!
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
skyhawk21 said:
Download Vellamo benchmark from Google Play, you can side swipe the screens and menus in program, one of the screens shows your device in purple and system information and you click or touch that and scroll down the system info and you'll see brand name and revision code of your built in storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tip!. I see that I have the Samsung MAG2GA. Is there anything I need to be concerned about with running CM 10.1.3?
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
Don't run lagfix or enable trim support because samsung emmc is not compatible and will hardlock the nook due to corruption!
mgoblue62 said:
Thanks for the tip!. I see that I have the Samsung MAG2GA. Is there anything I need to be concerned about with running CM 10.1.3?
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
skyhawk21 said:
Don't run lagfix or enable trim support because samsung emmc is not compatible and will hardlock the nook due to corruption!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmmm. I've already run lagfix a couple of times - hope it hasn't caused any damage.
It's a shame there isn't a manufacturer fix for this that can be applied, as is sometimes the case with SSDs.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
pdx1138 said:
I'm running 10.1 6/30 build and got quadrant score of 2600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ran it again with force gpu render on for 2D and score went just over 3000
Antutu with Samsung 13376
Antutu with Sandisk memory 13475
Not sure how much of the performance difference may be attributed to the memory type.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
Related
Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged
gozzaa said:
Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run this test just because I was bored. But our phone is ''NOT'' in the list. Its a different phone called wildfire ''S''
But there are many ways that can improve your score on the app (Don't see the point tho as phone is so old and without gpu) try different gov's eg. Performance and you can get a faster sd card eg class 10 (as it collects points for sd reads and writes)
My Antutu score is 932
CM7 build 14 (I find it the most stable one out there)
CPU MAX 768
CPU MIN 748
PERFORMANCE Governor
Compcache 18%
JIT enabled
Surface dithering enabled
Purging of assists enabled
VM HEAP SIZE 32m
Sent from my CM7 powered HTC Wildfire.
Some Info
you can compare wildfires once you have benchmarked your own, under the ranking category, top at the mo seems to have a score of 6126 but that also has a CPU speed of 1200 MHz otherwise there are more realistic ones further down, but i mannaged 1087 score with my wildfire which is still on a stock ROM lol, but as stated SD card makes a difference, i have installed an 8Gb class 10 samsung and modified the cache. But none the less, i have a lot of apps and not much RAM free so i found my score supprising compared with other wildfires. And remember, benchmarks dont represent ability in day to day use or even heavy use, they just give a theoretical overview.
But if you do want to improve your wildfire with visible results and not just numbers, i would recommend some of the below
A Class 10 Memory Card
Increase the cashe size of the memory card (improves Read/Write) but not too far i have found problems at higher values apps like SD speed boost are nice
Task Killer, automatic ones are good and save you effort :L
Overclock and undervolt with a governor appropriate for your use, this gives massively improved performance on demand and save battery when that performance is not required
New ROM, athough i have not done this personaly there are many a report of speed improvements due to less bloatware on ROM's like cyanogenmod
Move apps to SD not so much a speed thing but if you have a fast card then it saves internal space with no loss in performance
Apps like Optimize toolbox, Set CPU and memory booster helped with these.
so i am sure if i flashed a new ROM i could get my score up to 1100 at least if not further and there are things i have not tried yet so i would not say a score of 1200 is out of reach and you could probably go further, but not 6126 as antutu seems to think :L
if there is anything i have missed please tell me and i will add to the list, hope this helps
Mine tested for fun as I don't give a monkeys about it.
HTC wildfire: LeWaOs
Too lazy to screenshot
Score: 856
ROM: KoolSense
CPU:352-710MHz interactive governor
Rempuzzle, 748-768 performance, however I normally use 176-768 conservative.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
My total score was 958 using cm7 rc3
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Using Rempuzzle 2.71
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
nejc121 said:
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Scratch0805 said:
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
I think mine dropped after I installed many apps, during my "app rush" stage. That was when I was so crazy about apps since I had to limit myself on the Wildfire or I'd have to sacrifice one app to get another lol!
Maybe when I root this phone, after it gets Revolutionary S-OFF (Only option is HTCDev now which I don't trust) I can get TrickDroid or the unofficial CM9 Alpha10!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
My score: 1067
Oxygen 2.3.2 with Juwe Ram script
768-176 performance
normal i use 729-518 SmartassV2
score: 1062
usaff22 said:
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:
nejc121 said:
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium
Justice™ said:
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually for the Novo7 Aurora, but the tablets are practically the same, save for the IPS display on the Aurora.
There's also a Ubuntu and ICS dualboot ROM, but that one does need a hardware keyboard atleast once (Just for the first login, you can get an onscreen one later)
Otherwise, the Elf II did come out recently, but that one doesn't have any ROMs yet :silly:
Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.
Scratch0805 said:
Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So was it underclocked at first or was it the stock clockspeed and you wanted to OC it?
It has a Mali 400 if I'm not mistaken, just downloaded ex tweaks to setup something else and noticed the Max gpu speed was 276 so it must have got underclocked somewhere along the way.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I've been testing supercharger for jellybean for about a day now and I have noticed a boost in performance so I'd thought I'd pass it on.
I'm on cm10 jellybro 8/17 with air kernel #201 non bigmem and noticed the difference immediately after the reboot. Apps seem to open quicker and the phone doesn't lock up as much when multitasking. Also, even though it says I'm only 50% supercharged and I have a weak launcher I still haven't gotten a launcher redraw since running the script but IMA test that more for sure.
I installed all the tweaks it asks if you want before you get the part where you pick the oom groupings :including the 3g speed hack and I chose the moderate 512 HP I think its option 6.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276/
Hope this helps: )
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Good to know...I tried a while ago and restored my backup since it said I was only 50%. I might have to give it another shot
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
jeremy112683 said:
Good to know...I tried a while ago and restored my backup since it said I was only 50%. I might have to give it another shot
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do some research... As supercharger doesn't really boost your Nexus. It's more for low end devices with little rom. If you haven't had bigmem then maybe you'd feel it yes, I'm running new rasbeanjelly with bedalus and it runs soo smooth with at least 160 mb free ram
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
kwibis said:
Do some research... As supercharger doesn't really boost your Nexus. It's more for low end devices with little rom. If you haven't had bigmem then maybe you'd feel it yes, I'm running new rasbeanjelly with bedalus and it runs soo smooth with at least 160 mb free ram
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hate to break it to you but by modern standard the NS is low end. ICS and JB were built mainly for a device with a GB or more of RAM so every last byte counts.
kwibis said:
Do some research... As supercharger doesn't really boost your Nexus. It's more for low end devices with little rom. If you haven't had bigmem then maybe you'd feel it yes, I'm running new rasbeanjelly with bedalus and it runs soo smooth with at least 160 mb free ram
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How low end? I heard the same thing when people were testing it on the epic touch which is understandable but for a phone with 512mb running a big os? Yes every little bit helps
Btw I did do my research thanks
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Its not going away any time soon.
Nexus 7 and SGSIII users complain of lag after awhile and supercharging fixes it... as usual.
I, too, can confirm that the Supercharger works good on JB. Running the latest Codename with Air Kernel, supercharger does make a difference I've found but only when multitasking. Disappointing though to still see the occasional launcher redraw, but it's not that big a deal.
Sent from my Nexus S
---------- Post added at 10:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:51 PM ----------
zeppelinrox said:
Its not going away any time soon.
Nexus 7 and SGSIII users complain of lag after awhile and supercharging fixes it... as usual.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You've just reminded me to root my N7, lol. Great work with supercharger btw
Sent from my Nexus S
You can easily afford to bulletproof the launcher if you have a redraw here or there
genaro12543 said:
I've been testing supercharger for jellybean for about a day now and I have noticed a boost in performance so I'd thought I'd pass it on.
I'm on cm10 jellybro 8/17 with air kernel #201 non bigmem and noticed the difference immediately after the reboot. Apps seem to open quicker and the phone doesn't lock up as much when multitasking. Also, even though it says I'm only 50% supercharged and I have a weak launcher I still haven't gotten a launcher redraw since running the script but IMA test that more for sure.
I installed all the tweaks it asks if you want before you get the part where you pick the oom groupings :including the 3g speed hack and I chose the moderate 512 HP I think its option 6.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276/
Hope this helps: )
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to use the Jellyscreampatcher to patch files to patch files to get 100%, use this thread to guide you
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1869663
let me know if this helps you
i will try this supercharger too :good:.
Anyone has tangible numbers to represent the improvement? Anything that could be proven as not placebo?
The supercharger makes me think of kids ricing their Civics or a bad commercial with erroneous/random capitalization, funny made up words and flashy colors.
SuperCharger! BulletProof! Die-Hard! Hard To Kill! SuperClean! Cust-OOM! 3G TurboCharger! Kick Ass Kernel Tweaks! MegaRAM!
Where's Vince from Shamwow when you need him eh?
Not saying it doesn't work, but this is the kind of talk clearly made to pickup sheeple rather than to expose facts. How information is presented doesn't really change the end result but changes the target population. Don't all get offended now.
Of those that actually used it, if I remember the math (too lazy to do it now):
50% say it's the best mod ever... It jumbs to...
65% when you add those that say Big Performance Boost... It jumps to...
80% when you add those that say Noticeable Performance Boost.
Are those numbers ok, Frenchy?
zeppelinrox said:
Of those that actually used it, if I remember the math (too lazy to do it now):
50% say it's the best mod ever... It jumbs to...
65% when you add those that say Big Performance Boost... It jumps to...
80% when you add those that say Noticeable Performance Boost.
Are those numbers ok, Frenchy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boost™ with zOOM zOOM features?
That's a nice poll, but it's flawed in the sense people that will answer it are very likely users of the mod. Kinda like asking an Android user if he thinks Android is better than iOS. Wouldn't be surprised to see the majority answer YES there, and NO if asked on Apple boards.
Other than a poll, any other data to look at? Is the performance measurable in any kind of way?
And you fail to take into account that the majority of respondents have used other tweaks and mods.
This XDA...duh...
And yet, BEST MOD EVER was the most clicked response.
I see you just like to blow hot air and listen to yourself talk before actually knowing anything first hand.
Any more ignorant musings will only qualify as trolling and make you look stupider (I know it's not word but fits perfectly)
Can use supercharge v6 on NS4G? I
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
zeppelinrox said:
And you fail to take into account that the majority of respondents have used other tweaks and mods.
This XDA...duh...
And yet, BEST MOD EVER was the most clicked response.
I see you just like to blow hot air and listen to yourself talk before actually knowing anything first hand.
Any more ignorant musings will only qualify as trolling and make you look stupider (I know it's not word but fits perfectly)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shall I gather that you fell down to insults because you're unable to bring anything else than a zany poll? :good:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Somehow performance should be measured. However as this tweak is said to improve system smoothness and available ram I think it is difficult to measure it.
My own experience is that I don't feel the difference as my phone has enough ram available and never experience launcher redraw anyway.
But as the poll concludes, people say they feel the difference. Don't think all of these votes are fanboy votes so there must be improvements.
Sent from my Nexus S
polobunny said:
Shall I gather that you fell down to insults because you're unable to bring anything else than a zany poll? :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I stated a fact.
You've been trolling.
Nothing you have posted in this thread has benefited any single molecule in the entire universe.
I brought something.
You've brought NOTHING but BS.
You failed statistics in high school didn't you? We could go on and on, and I could troll all day, but so far only kwibis has tried to justify the use of supercharger through a coherent approach.
You're the biggest troll here, touting all sorts of improvements without being able to calmly back it up with anything else other than a ridiculously flawed poll. You step low enough to get insulting and try to nit pick on someone to discredit them rather than to work on a way to prove your claims. And yes, there's actually a way to test for UI smoothness just as there's a way to test for UI animations. You should try to improve your scientific approach a bit instead of getting your panties in a bunch and getting huffy at the first non believer. I swear it'll help you in life as a whole.
Hey guys
since i saw a lot of kernel for the beast N7100
and i think a lot of you may be asking which kernel to choose
i liked just to make a small comparison for those kernel via Antutu Benchmark
some of you care for the performance results, and some just want a balance Kernel
therefore i tested almost all kernel for the SAMMY based kernels and upload the pix for you
in this way you may get a better idea how might your phone look alike, But also you have to watch you Battery
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1600 MHz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1800 MHz
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 2000 MHz
Correction for 2 kernel name, Perseus 1.36, and Redpill 1.47
It migt be not so important for you,
but if you think i helped you
please do not hesitate to click the Thanks button
alright but now do some tests for battery life, i think thats no1 reason what people want in custom kernel
use every kernel for few days with "normal" usage and do screenshots every day of battery and screen on time when batttery goes critical. i planned to do that but kinda lazy
also it would be good to do some recording of wakelocks on every kernel.
trpi said:
alright but now do some tests for battery life, i think thats no1 reason what people want in custom kernel
use every kernel for few days with "normal" usage and do screenshots every day of battery and screen on time when batttery goes critical. i planned to do that but kinda lazy
also it would be good to do some recording of wakelocks on every kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats indeed better, but me also cant make the test for battery...since i daily or every 2 days change a rom....my phone is not stable on any rom lol
Were these benchmark runs only once?
McLaren__F1 said:
Were these benchmark runs only once?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u mean one test for kernel, then yes
good comparison.. which rom where u using while doing the testing??
also which baseband and build?
This is so completely irrelevant to anyone but you. A single run of benchmarks is in no way indicitave of a kernels performance.
Anyone making the decision to flash a kernel based solely on a screenshot of some benchmarks should just stick to stock and save themselves the hassle.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
fake_japanese_guy said:
good comparison.. which rom where u using while doing the testing??
also which baseband and build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On alliance rom v3 dmc3 baseband xdkl7...when ur rom will be ready ?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
This is so completely irrelevant to anyone but you. A single run of benchmarks is in no way indicitave of a kernels performance.
Anyone making the decision to flash a kernel based solely on a screenshot of some benchmarks should just stick to stock and save themselves the hassle.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So where is ur point?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
mrlove6 said:
So where is ur point?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My point is that the information you have provided is useful only to you and even then it isn't particularly useful.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
conantroutman said:
My point is that the information you have provided is useful only to you and even then it isn't particularly useful.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe thats ur opinion..when benchmark and kernels are never important there was no need to invent the benchmark. ...anyway ill try to contact phonearena.com and gsmarena.com and tell them to stop testing phones on benchmark ( useless ) becuase u said so. Thanks for ur pass
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
it is interesting someone post a result with 3d score 863 for a note 2. do you know what that mean?
Means overclicking so much isnt good with this kernal...and as u see I think its the only one have low value
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
mrlove6 said:
Maybe thats ur opinion..when benchmark and kernels are never important there was no need to invent the benchmark. ...anyway ill try to contact phonearena.com and gsmarena.com and tell them to stop testing phones on benchmark ( useless ) becuase u said so. Thanks for ur pass
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They actually use repeatable tests. Or at least I hope they do. Not just you running the benchmark once...
If you want even a modicum of respect in the field of scientific testing, you'd have given the details of the ROM version in use, and also the process used to average the results over a number of executions.
Scientific tests are based across running one test multiple times without changing anything, as it increases the reliability of the results if they agree with each other.
Usually you can discount the lowest and highest result each time you repeat the same test, but then you need to average the remaining results. I'd expect that benchmarks should be normally distributed around the actual score.
mrlove6 said:
Hey guys
since i saw a lot of kernel for the beast N7100
and i think a lot of you may be asking which kernel to choose
i liked just to make a small comparison for those kernel via Antutu Benchmark
some of you care for the performance results, and some just want a balance Kernel
therefore i tested almost all kernel for the SAMMY based kernels and upload the pix for you
in this way you may get a better idea how might your phone look alike, But also you have to watch you Battery
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1600 MHz
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1800 MHz
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 2000 MHz
It migt be not so important for you,
but if you think i helped you
please do not hesitate to click the Thanks button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got (1600Mhz) 1800+ score in AnTuTu ...without any junks i got 18500+
NEAK kernel...
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Which rom u r using ?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Omega Rom v16+SaberKernel:good:
Wow your scores are pretty bad. I use to get 19,000+ with ARHD and Perseus kernel OC to 1.8Ghz and UV down to -50mv. However, I also realised that if you keep benchmarking repeatedly one after the other you will get lower scores due to built up of heat and other factors such as RAM usage. So the question is: How long did you wait between benchmarking a kernel and what were the precautions you took before initiating a benchmark run? And what was the average score of each kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
bushako said:
Wow your scores are pretty bad. I use to get 19,000+ with ARHD and Perseus kernel OC to 1.8Ghz and UV down to -50mv. However, I also realised that if you keep benchmarking repeatedly one after the other you will get lower scores due to built up of heat and other factors such as RAM usage. So the question is: How long did you wait between benchmarking a kernel and what were the precautions you took before initiating a benchmark run? And what was the average score of each kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u take a look on the screenshots, u will see exactly the time and the average compared to the 3 oc 1600 1800 and 2000
Maybe re-run the test? Clear Memory, Kill apps before running each test?
Take the average of lets say 3 runs?
CM9 Mods by MaceksMod (jacobmacek)
Nav Bar
Adds Navigation bar to bottom of screen
Download
Phablet UI
Enables Dual Pane, adds nav bar, allows lock screen rotation & allows all rotation (even 180).
Download
Allow Lock Screen rotation
Allows rotation of stock lock screen
Download
Allow all rotation
Allows all rotations, even 180 degrees (upside down)
Download
Pie Controls
Integrates LMT Launcher. Adds Button in settings named Pie Controls launching LMT. LMT icon is hidden from app drawer.
Flashable zip coming soon, if you would like to code the mod yourself, look here
Remap search button to bring up recent apps
Changes functionality of search button, launches recent apps rather than search.
Coming Soon...
Add recent apps button to status bar
A button to launch recent apps is added to to of status bar next to settings icon.
Coming Soon...
Settings in PhabletUI
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
reserved
You are a hero to the thunderbolt community sir! Thanks.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Does the nav bar mod allow for more than the home/recent/back options? Thanks for putting these together.
Sent from my skz_tenderloin using xda premium
Can't wait to use this mod... great work 2all....
Sent from my ThunderBump using xda premium
rrrrrrredbelly said:
Does the nav bar mod allow for more than the home/recent/back options? Thanks for putting these together.
Sent from my skz_tenderloin using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, its just the stock navbar within the system ui, the search and menu soft buttons are inside of the system ui, just not linked to the navbar. so in theory, to add those 2 buttons, i would have to go to the xml files and copy the instance where the back button is but change all references to back/menu. I was going to focus most of my development time on these mods but the 3.0 kernel source was released yesterday so i am working on a custom kernel. This means fully working ics roms. I am adding overclocking to 1.9 ghz, and some governers, the usual stuff.
jacobmacek said:
no, its just the stock navbar within the system ui, the search and menu soft buttons are inside of the system ui, just not linked to the navbar. so in theory, to add those 2 buttons, i would have to go to the xml files and copy the instance where the back button is but change all references to back/menu. I was going to focus most of my development time on these mods but the 3.0 kernel source was released yesterday so i am working on a custom kernel. This means fully working ics roms. I am adding overclocking to 1.9 ghz, and some governers, the usual stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most bolts can't handle over 1.5 GHz.
Sent from my Infected Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Dark Jedi said:
Most bolts can't handle over 1.5 GHz.
Sent from my Infected Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not without frying it lol.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
Not without frying it lol.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the highest I have gotten it to go [while being ULV'ed] was 1.35Ghz
after being pushed any higher is would freeze and bootloop
really badly. This was when the Thunderbolt came
out and it still had Gingerbread with custom kernel.
I was able to get GB up to 1.6 by overvolting but like I said. You can fry it. Now if I go up that high it locks up instantly. Tbh oc up to 1.9 won't do you much good except drain the battery or screw the phone up permanently.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
I was able to get GB up to 1.6 by overvolting but like I said. You can fry it. Now if I go up that high it locks up instantly. Tbh oc up to 1.9 won't do you much good except drain the battery or screw the phone up permanently.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree.
I think the only reason you should have it that high is the "wow factor"
Now having it Under-Volted just a smidge is what I have always used..
You can't actually screw up your phone from oc'ing it, only ov'ing. Worst case scenario, it gets hot, freezes, and reboots... And you're right where you were before. I'm running mine at 1766 right now, all of our processors handle over clocking differently
Edit: running steady at 1920
Edit: aaaand it froze haha. Test your CPU's limits, mines 1766, what's yours?
Dark Jedi said:
Most bolts can't handle over 1.5 GHz.
Sent from my Infected Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyones processor has a different amount of wear and tear, the previous owner of my bolt never overclocked past 1.2 ghz so i can easilly run mine at 1.7 ghz stable, the option for 1.9 is there for those who can handle it
je2854 said:
the highest I have gotten it to go [while being ULV'ed] was 1.35Ghz
after being pushed any higher is would freeze and bootloop
really badly. This was when the Thunderbolt came
out and it still had Gingerbread with custom kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
must have been a cruddy kernel :/
jacobmacek said:
You can't actually screw up your phone from oc'ing it, only ov'ing. Worst case scenario, it gets hot, freezes, and reboots... And you're right where you were before. I'm running mine at 1766 right now, all of our processors handle over clocking differently
Edit: running steady at 1920
Edit: aaaand it froze haha. Test your CPU's limits, mines 1766, what's yours?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You indeed can ruin your processor running oc. It was intended to run at 1ghz and running oc at any level over what it was intended will shorten the life of if substantially. Lets not confuse people about that fact. It can be harmful for your processor.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
You indeed can ruin your processor running oc. It was intended to run at 1ghz and running oc at any level over what it was intended will shorten the life of if substantially. Lets not confuse people about that fact. It can be harmful for your processor.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that it can shorten the life of your processor and ware it but your statement made it sound like if you select anything over 1.5 will instantly kill your cpu. That can happen with computers but in android if its clocked too high for the cpu to handle, the kernel panic makes it reboot so your processor doesnt in fact "fry itself".
disconnecktie said:
You indeed can ruin your processor running oc. It was intended to run at 1ghz and running oc at any level over what it was intended will shorten the life of if substantially. Lets not confuse people about that fact. It can be harmful for your processor.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine runs at 1.2ghz stock, since the JB update. I believe that these cpus are actually meant to run at 1.2ghz, but were under-clocked when released. So running at 1.3 or 1.4 ghz is really not pushing it.
jacobmacek said:
must have been a cruddy kernel :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have always been an avid OC'er on any machine I have ever owned..
BUT just because -I- could not over-clock it higher didn't mean it was
a crappy kernel.. ALL phones are made differently no matter if it is the
same hardware profile or not...
kristoff123 said:
Mine runs at 1.2ghz stock, since the JB update. I believe that these cpus are actually meant to run at 1.2ghz, but were under-clocked when released. So running at 1.3 or 1.4 ghz is really not pushing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who's jb rom are you running?
htc set a performance lock for the ics kernel
kristoff123 said:
Mine runs at 1.2ghz stock, since the JB update. I believe that these cpus are actually meant to run at 1.2ghz, but were under-clocked when released. So running at 1.3 or 1.4 ghz is really not pushing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had a Samsung Moment and found this information out
it was a stock stocked at 600Mhz SPRINT OC'ed it to 800Mhz and
it could be OC'ed to 1.12Ghz without it freezing or being unstable.
So I know exactly what you are talking about when you said this..
Hi all,
I've recently installed the overclocked kernel from squid and am having some trouble reaching the same benchmarks that he has hit. I am running stock MM with row 128 I/O and adreno-tz on the GPU. CPU is lionfish with min frequencies 800 on both clusters. I think squid is running CM13.
I consistently score between 680-740 single and 2680-2800 multi. Does this look about right for stock MM with the overlooked kernel?
Any help maximizing this would be greatly appreciated. I know these scores have (probably) very little to do with real-world use but if I can get more out of my device then why not.
Thank you for any insight!
XxMikeMasterxX said:
Hi all,
I've recently installed the overclocked kernel from squid and am having some trouble reaching the same benchmarks that he has hit. I am running stock MM with row 128 I/O and adreno-tz on the GPU. CPU is lionfish with min frequencies 800 on both clusters. I think squid is running CM13.
I consistently score between 680-740 single and 2680-2800 multi. Does this look about right for stock MM with the overlooked kernel?
Any help maximizing this would be greatly appreciated. I know these scores have (probably) very little to do with real-world use but if I can get more out of my device then why not.
Thank you for any insight!
EDIT: Moderator - could you please edit the title of the post and correct the typo? GeekBench, not Brnch. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try with simple on demand in gpu.
I will try this app today.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
K.khiladi said:
Try with simple on demand in gpu.
I will try this app today.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey pal. Thanks for your feedback. Nice to see your response. I'll try it out as you suggest. I've been running a bunch of tests and it's looking like I hover around 740-50 single and 2700-50 multi. I've changed the configuration to default squid, so interactive governor and aggressive frequency settings. Needless to say the performance sure is snappy. Hahaha.
I'll likely revert to lionfish 800 on both clusters but this interactive snappiness is tempting...
Exactly 700 and 2700 with the oc kernel, stock brazil mm. Not even kidding. Although i sincerely doubt anything but a "native" extension can accurately measure a device performance, there is too much virtual machine and abstractions between hardware and software. Then again, this limitation applies to almost all apps, eg the normal usecase...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My score
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
K.khiladi said:
My score
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks to be about mine as well. What's your setup?
I got similar scores with lionfish, 800 both clusters. OCed kernel.
AtomicStryker said:
Exactly 700 and 2700 with the oc kernel, stock brazil mm. Not even kidding. Although i sincerely doubt anything but a "native" extension can accurately measure a device performance, there is too much virtual machine and abstractions between hardware and software. Then again, this limitation applies to almost all apps, eg the normal usecase...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your setup, Atomic?
Running
Temasek's CM 4.1
OC Kernel with interactive and row 256kbps
XxMikeMasterxX said:
Looks to be about mine as well. What's your setup?
I got similar scores with lionfish, 800 both clusters. OCed kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interactive. Base frequencies on both clusters 200. Overcharged squid kernel.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 09:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:08 PM ----------
TxaEkis said:
Running
Temasek's CM 4.1
OC Kernel with interactive and row 256kbps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm seems to be set for higher benchmarks.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Yeah does it ever. Stock gives me max 770 single 2815 multi. I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle of ROM switching to get those extra points. Would I really see the performance difference?
Although I am tempted to try a new ROM. Would be fun...so long as I use Titanium Backup properly. Hahaha
XxMikeMasterxX said:
Yeah does it ever. Stock gives me max 770 single 2815 multi. I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle of ROM switching to get those extra points. Would I really see the performance difference?
Although I am tempted to try a new ROM. Would be fun...so long as I use Titanium Backup properly. Hahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are happy with stock don't bother as you won't even notice those extra points in the benchmark. I changed roms for the extra features and cm themes and i was getting random lag until i changed to interactive and row, now is very smooth and zero lag
TxaEkis said:
If you are happy with stock don't bother as you won't even notice those extra points in the benchmark. I changed roms for the extra features and cm themes and i was getting random lag until i changed to interactive and row, now is very smooth and zero lag
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interactive is a great governor yeah. Thanks for your response regarding the ROM. I hear that CM13 is still a little shaky on the X Play but maybe I'll try the next release just to compare. I'll try a full discharge from 100% with default squid's OC kernel values. If I can still get >7 hours SOT with that setup and snappy performance I'll be thrilled.
XxMikeMasterxX said:
Yeah does it ever. Stock gives me max 770 single 2815 multi. I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle of ROM switching to get those extra points. Would I really see the performance difference?
Although I am tempted to try a new ROM. Would be fun...so long as I use Titanium Backup properly. Hahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is miniscule difference. It doesn't create a great performance difference between stock and custom Roms. The benchmarks most of the time shows the raw power of the device but the optimisation of the software also is needed.
You can try custom Roms to get extra functionality but there are still bugs in them.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
K.khiladi said:
This is miniscule difference. It doesn't create a great performance difference between stock and custom Roms. The benchmarks most of the time shows the raw power of the device but the optimisation of the software also is needed.
You can try custom Roms to get extra functionality but there are still bugs in them.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nicely said. Performance and stability are key for me. Battery life too. Haha. I just love the X Play for that battery. 5 hours SOT and 21%. So lovely.
I had carefully tuned CM13 to get the best performance out of this device, so it and derivatives will give better performance than the defaults in stock. You can see some of my configuration here: https://github.com/moto8916/android_device_motorola_lux/blob/cm-13.0/rootdir/etc/init.target.rc Beyond that, some higher level parts of the ROM are better optimized on custom ROMs than stock, so that also improves performance.
For reference, here is my last score with the new (OC) kernel:
squid2 said:
I had carefully tuned CM13 to get the best performance out of this device, so it and derivatives will give better performance than the defaults in stock. You can see some of my configuration here: https://github.com/moto8916/android_device_motorola_lux/blob/cm-13.0/rootdir/etc/init.target.rc Beyond that, some higher level parts of the ROM are better optimized on custom ROMs than stock, so that also improves performance.
For reference, here is my last score with the new (OC) kernel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey squid,
Looks interesting. I think CM13 is definitely worth a look. I think I'll try the next release. Thanks for explaining the customizations/optimizations you've done.
Frankly, i couldn't care less about some number a synthetic benchmark spits out. The number 1 consideration is how long the battery lasts, then (a long way off) how quickly "heavy" apps such as firefox launch. Last i read CM13 isn't as good as stock at conserving power.
AtomicStryker said:
Frankly, i couldn't care less about some number a synthetic benchmark spits out. The number 1 consideration is how long the battery lasts, then (a long way off) how quickly "heavy" apps such as firefox launch. Last i read CM13 isn't as good as stock at conserving power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life is quintessential for me, too. I was hoping to strike a balance between performance and battery (hence the Optimal Setup thread) and am still trying to discern what the best setup is to meet my requirements.
I'd like to try a custom ROM at some point, but that's my curiosity more than anything.
Battery life on the X Play can't be beat! That's why I got it.
Moto x play is no slough, I just ran a test between my nexus 6 and MXP,
Most apps actually open faster on the moto x.
Scrolling through Web pages and g+ the nexus 6 is smoother
flashallthetime said:
Moto x play is no slough, I just ran a test between my nexus 6 and MXP,
Most apps actually open faster on the moto x.
Scrolling through Web pages and g+ the nexus 6 is smoother
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. I'd expect that. Still though - if properly customized this phone can really fly.