Database Users

[ROM]'~~~*boLTEd*~~~' v0.35 (04/03/11)

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Image by frostman89
First off I would like to thank everyone who tested and showed support to me, Derek and Brian, second of all the original thread for our ROM is HERE << this is where you will get the most support. Expect this in ROM Manager soon. More updates to come, I am still working with Drod to figure out the recent apps in the framework. Until then please enjoy this ROM and Kernels. They are all using the BFS and undervolted as low as possible without affecting waking. THEY DO NOT affect data. Please wipe before install. Thanks and more to come soon!
BROKEN:
Nothing
Wipe first!
**************************UPDATE (04/03/11)**************************
Same version, the only thing that was changed, was the wifi module was incorrect. Same download link.
The wifi module being incorrect broke wifi, and wireless tether.
This version now also defaults to 998 MHz. Just because the kernel allows you to overclock to 1.8 GHz, does not mean you should, remember that
**************************UPDATE (04/02/11)**************************
Script fixes/changes.
New Kernels (Updated BFS Patch)
Goodbye recent apps in notification bar.
**************************UPDATE (03/31/11)**************************
v0.3 uploaded, check changelog.
Introducing: boLTEd v0.3 by Drod2169 and B16
Based off of the most recent official build of the thunderbolt, base rom from Adrynalynes debloated rom.
FIRST OFF: THANKS TO @TEAMANDIRC AND FRIENDS FOR MAKING THIS POSSIBLE. THANKS ADRYNALYNE FOR PUTTIN' OUT GOOD SH*T. THEY ****ING ROCK!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Linear Theme by BGill55 and friends - HERE
Stock theme included
Features:
***************v0.3**************
Bye bye GPS icon (bgill55)
Bye bye AM/PM (bgill55)
Hello 1.8GHz Kernel (Pre loaded)
Few more tweaks to the guts!
***************v0.2**************
Since there are kernel issues with CWM, the kernel w/ ramdisk edits I made will be uploaded seperately as a PG05IMG.zip. Otherwise,
I virtually made it meaningless (for now)
Ads blocked by default (NOTE: This will cause issues with words w/ friends)
- To enable adds, run the script in terminal emulator (adblock -on or adblock -off enables/disables respectively)
Sense/AOSP Lockscreen option
- To switch back and forth, run the script "lockscreen" in terminal emulator (w/out quotes)
lockscreen -aosp enables aosp lockscreen (reboot to take effect) lockscreen -sense re-enables the sense lockscreen (reboot to take effect)
System Read/Write or Read/Only scripts
-To use this, run the script "sys" in terminal emulator (w/out quotes)
sys -rw mounts the system re-writeable, sys -ro mount the system read only.
VM tweaks moved to init.d due to kernel issue
Tweaked the pre-loaded sysctl.conf tweaks
ACTUALLY changed the wifi scan and vm heap size to 180/48 respectively (don't dev drunk)
***********************************
Sysctl.conf support
init.d support
Ondemand gov tweaks
VM tweaks
Fully optimized
Bash and nano added
Wifi scan interval upped to 180 for battery
VM heap size raised to 48
More I/O tweaks.
A lot more I can't think of in the current non sober state I am now.
DO NOT REPOST THIS IN ANOTHER FORUM!!!!
KANG AT WILL. IF YOU DON'T CREDIT, WE WILL TROLL YOU UNTIL YOU DIE.
POST ISSUES HERE NOT ON TWITTER. WE RESPECT OUR FOLLOWERS TIMELINES. KTHX.
If you want a screen shot look at your phone now.
Hosted by CrackFlashers.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
V 0.35 - DOWNLOAD - 194.16 MB
*******BFS UV Kernels******* ROM DEVS: If you want to include it in your ROM let me know, you can use it no problem.
1.0 GHz Kernel - HERE - (Stock speed)
1.1 GHz Kernel - HERE
1.2 GHz Kernel - HERE
1.5 GHz Kernel - HERE
1.8 GHz Kernel - HERE - (Comes pre loaded in the ROM)
******* NEW!!! BFS UV Kernels Version 2 *******[/B] Very stable, but would like to let them float in to everyday use, will be included next release.
1.2 GHz Kernel - HERE
1.8 GHz Kernel - HERE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Install with Clockwork Mod recovery
(Don't forget to wipe Data and Cache please)!!!
Keyboard fixed!
Credits:
Beesley for the homescreen redraw tweaks.
Adrynalyne for being an awesome dev and giving us a deodexed ROM to play with. Also for the SU tweaks.
Overall thoughts, this ROM is amazingly fast for an already amazingly fast phone, there is a lot more we want to add to it.
If you are a current dev and would like to help out hit either b16 or Drod up on twitter to jump in on the greatness
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
B16 Twitter
~~~~~~~
Drod2169 Twitter
~~~~~~~
BGill55 Twitter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Based off Adrynalyne's Debloated ROM.
Cooked ROM by Drod2169, B16, and soon to have other devs!
Donate to Drod2169, I am covering most of the Hotel for I/O, since he got raped for the price of the IO ticket,
I would appreciate it if you donated to him to help with the flight. I would just like a thanks button or a follow on twitter. Donate below for DRod2169.
DONATE

Wrong date Just saying

psufan5 said:
Wrong date Just saying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the 3/31/11 is because it was released on another forum yesterday, 3/31/11.

bp328i said:
I think the 3/31/11 is because it was released on another forum yesterday, 3/31/11.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, I've been using this ROM since yesterday with the built in 1.8 ghz kernel. This is an absolute phenomenal ROM! My highest quadrant was over 2800 right after booting up.

Cool!!! gonna give it a go..

Alright I'm in, will report back shortly.
BTW thanks for the rom. Tell Drod I live in St. Pete, if he gets down this way I would surely buy him a few bruskie's for his work.
P.S. Smith, what is a good economical max clock over 1k mhz if I just want to watch movies and get the best battery life?

I hope you guys enjoy. Let me know!

Hell yeah... Gonna give it a go before I go to work tonight.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Flashed this morning, love the Rom. Runs smooth and the battery life seems better imo.
If I could make a suggestion, I love the five row app drawer a couple of the other roms have. Maybe this could be added at a later update? That and maybe a transparent app drawer. Thanks for all the work that's been put into this!
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

Flashed this morning. The only thing I found not working was the speech to text.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Can u guys replace the htc messenger with cm? HTC messenger suck ass. Gets slow..
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

johndiblasi said:
Can we flash the kernel only on the stock Rom?
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All kernels in the OP work. I have not tried any others.

ajftl said:
Can u guys replace the htc messenger with cm? HTC messenger suck ass. Gets slow..
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have a list of updates in progress. Stay tuned.

b16a2smith said:
We have a list of updates in progress. Stay tuned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome bro. That would be great.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

Very impressed so far (quads 1637, 1714,v1677). Everything seems to be functioning, have to wrap it up for tonight, time to go downtown and get frosty. Will hit this forum up tomorrow. Nothing like going out and depending on your phone when you've just flash a new rom/kernel. But it looks good, I'm confident. Great work, thanks again.

I LOVE this rom! Great battery life, even tho I have it oc to 1.8

crackflashers FTW

jlevy73 said:
crackflashers FTW
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nuff said.

That 1.8 oc is crazy fast. 2863 on quadrant
sent from my lightning fast thunderbolt

Tlowery88 said:
That 1.8 oc is crazy fast. 2863 on quadrant
sent from my lightning fast thunderbolt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it is. 3105 on quadrant

[OC][UV] EPIC 4G Overclocking Data Roundup

Hey overclockers!
We have pushed this hardware so far beyond what it was originally designed to do. All other ICS-capable phones seem to have either faster-clocked or dual-core CPU. Overclocking seems to be a critical factor in pushing the limits of this device even further, to run the OS versions of the future and still perform smoothly without lag. So....
How about we share some OC/UV settings? Things like the following:
Voltage required for stable overclock at a certain frequency
Max stable frequency
What OC and testing apps do people recommend?
Which CPU Governor and I/O scheduler give you the best results?
Benchmark & stability test results
Kernel
ROM
Yes, I know OC/UV performance varies on every specific piece of silicon out there. But it would still be interesting to be able to compare OC with others to see if you're even in the ballpark. For example -- I'm perfectly stable at up to 1300Mhz and 1350mV vCore. I get app FCs and spontaneous reboots at 1500MHz even at up to 1525mV vCore. Is that better or worse than others? Is it really the OC that is causing the issue? Seems to be, cause it stops happening when I disable 1500Mhz.
If you overclock, please post your data here. Whichever data you like. Just please include your Kernel and ROM also, so that we can compare apples to apples.
Note: I am not actually encouraging anyone to overclock. There is always some risk involved, and it does technically void your warranty and can break your phone (but so can a lot of things ).

OC/UV Data
Max stable voltage/frequency - 1300Mhz @ 1350mV
OC app - Voltage Control Extreme
Stability testing app - LinPack
CPU governor - lagfree
I/O scheduler - noop
Kernel - SAMURAI.TANTO.CM9.MTD.02.15.02.35
ROM - CM9 Alpha 3

[*]Max stable voltage/frequency - 1400Mhz @ 1325mV
[*]OC app - Voltage Control, tegrak overlook ultimate
[*]Stability testing app - LinPack, smarkbench, quadrant standard
[*]CPU governor - conservative
[*]I/O scheduler - deadline
[*]Kernel - the newest Shadow Kernel MTD
[*]ROM - same setting on every ROM I use.
Edit:
I don't use 600Mhz, 900Mhz, 1100Mhz, or the 1300Mhz frequencies. And I undervolt everything. I also change the internal voltages to Rodderik's Genocide kernel defaults.
sent from my Evo Killer with Genocide

christophocles said:
Max stable voltage/frequency - 1300Mhz @ 1350mV
OC app - Voltage Control Extreme
Stability testing app - LinPack
CPU governor - lagfree
I/O scheduler - noop
Kernel - SAMURAI.TANTO.CM9.MTD.02.15.02.35
ROM - CM9 Alpha 3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Max stable voltage/frequency - 1500 @ 1425mV
Oc App - Voltage Control Extreme
Stability Testing - N64oid* takes a lot to run this sucker so this is my benchmark* especially with Zelda
CPU Gov - Interactive (the best one I've used fast when you need it and low when your idle)
I/O - VR
Kernel - Samurai Tanto
ROM CM9
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

I usually just OC to 1200 on whatever the stock voltage is set to. Sometimes I run it a little higher when playing N64oid.

[*]Max stable voltage/frequency - 1500mhz - 1500mv
[*]OC app - Voltage Control, Control Freak
[*]Stability testing app - LinPack, smarkbench, quadrant standard
[*]CPU governor - Lagfree
[*]I/O scheduler - VR
[*]Kernel - Samurai cm7 1.27.12
[*]ROM - CM7.2 #44
However my everyday overclock is 1200mhz at 1350mv. I run this normally because this is the freq our processors were built to be able to run max. Sammy underclocked us for battery life since competition was only at 1ghz at the time. Normally I run the performance gov but lately this has been getting the cpu stuck at 800mhz. I have the epic touch 1800mah battery so I don't really have to worry about battery life.
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic

My phone runs perfectly up to ~1.3Ghz. At ~1.4 freezing and crashing starts.
The voltage in my kernel for 1.3ghz is 1350. I don't mess with it.

I'm going start making my max frequency 1.2 now I can uv it to 1275mV sweet so far no freeze up broswer test time .
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

I don't believe your op. Mine runs fine on ics @ 1ghz
In Soviet Epic forum, clockworkmod root you!

marcusant said:
I don't believe your op. Mine runs fine on ics @ 1ghz
In Soviet Epic forum, clockworkmod root you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't either but it runs smoother on 1.2
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

Biggoron said:
I don't either but it runs smoother on 1.2
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look at these quads
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My epic is blazing

iSaint said:
Just look at these quads
My epic is blazing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol epic touch
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

marcusant said:
I don't believe your op. Mine runs fine on ics @ 1ghz
In Soviet Epic forum, clockworkmod root you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just keep telling yourself that. Lol
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic

xopher.hunter said:
Just keep telling yourself that. Lol
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with him. I've tried overclocking and my phone can easily run 1.5ghz stable. Definitely boosts performance but not in any way that's entirely necassary (other than showing off, benchmarks, killing your battery faster, and shortening the life of your hardware). My phone runs perfectly smooth on stock cm9.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

Vizzo said:
I agree with him. I've tried overclocking and my phone can easily run 1.5ghz stable. Definitely boosts performance but not in any way that's entirely necassary (other than showing off, benchmarks, killing your battery faster, and shortening the life of your hardware). My phone runs perfectly smooth on stock cm9.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must be biased because of my epic touch battery. I can go performance 100/1500 with screen brightness all the way up and get the same battery life as the stock battery @ stock freq's.
Hypothetically if you guys get the sprint galaxy nexus @ 1.5ghz would you underclock it to 1.0ghz just because it works "fine"?
You guys need to stop being a slave to "stock" cpu frequencies and your battery. The hummingbird was designed to do 1.2ghz @ 1350mv.
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic

xopher.hunter said:
I must be biased because of my epic touch battery. I can go performance 100/1500 with screen brightness all the way up and get the same battery life as the stock battery @ stock freq's.
Hypothetically if you guys get the sprint galaxy nexus @ 1.5ghz would you underclock it to 1.0ghz just because it works "fine"?
You guys need to stop being a slave to "stock" cpu frequencies and your battery. The hummingbird was designed to do 1.2ghz @ 1350mv.
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
I rather have it 1250mV though
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

marcusant said:
I don't believe your op. Mine runs fine on ics @ 1ghz
In Soviet Epic forum, clockworkmod root you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I admit it's just my opinion. ICS "runs fine" at 1ghz. It's "tolerable". But IMO there is noticeable lag so it's not what I would call "good performance". I posted the settings for my phone that I have found to give me acceptable performance for my setup. Stock CPU frequency did not perform acceptably to me, so that's why I said that overclocking is a critical feature.
The UI lag is affected greatly by the CPU clockspeed but that's definitely not the only factor involved. It depends how many widgets you have on your homescreen, how many apps are running in the background, whether those currently running apps are stored on the SD card or not, how fast your SD card is with random reads/writes, your I/O scheduler, and other factors. For example, I noticed a big improvement in responsiveness and loading times simply by switching to noop scheduler (UI felt much snappier than with VR or CFQ). I also store a lot of apps on the SD card so I bought a 32gb Class 4 Sandisk microSD card because benchmarks show it has better 4K random write performance than the stock Samsung 16gb card, and I think that made a big improvement also.
I think we are already pushing the limits of this device simply by running ICS with its greater amount of eye candy and swooshiness. That's before we even start to run backgrounded apps like trillian, twidroyd, juicedefender, batterymonitor, and pandora all simultaneously with gps navigation in the foreground. All of this is doable, even with this phone's single core processor and RAM, but it's much more pleasant to do with an overclocked CPU. I know, because it's what I do with my phone every day. Sure, it nukes the battery, but I don't care because I'll just swap another one in when it dies and I care more about using my phone's capabilities than keeping it alive for 24 hours without charging. When I am out in the woods away from a charger I turn all this off and go into low power mode.
YMMV, of course
xopher.hunter said:
I must be biased because of my epic touch battery. I can go performance 100/1500 with screen brightness all the way up and get the same battery life as the stock battery @ stock freq's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm confused here. Do you mean you put an Epic 4G Touch battery in an original Epic 4G and get increased life? Or you actually use a Touch?

christophocles said:
I'm confused here. Do you mean you put an Epic 4G Touch battery in an original Epic 4G and get increased life? Or you actually use a Touch?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The epic touch battery fits in the OG epic just fine just its a little snug. However there are three major reasons why I got it
1. It has 1800mah, 300 more than stock
2. It is made in japan vs china (better battery tech)
3. My year old stock battery is not in good health (remember EF02 that **** got hot
You can find it on amazon for 18$ shippped
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic

xopher.hunter said:
The epic touch battery fits in the OG epic just fine just its a little snug. However there are three major reasons why I got it
1. It has 1800mah, 300 more than stock
2. It is made in japan vs china (better battery tech)
3. My year old stock battery is not in good health (remember EF02 that **** got hot
You can find it on amazon for 18$ shippped
Sent from my CM7.2 OG Epic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rather have a 3500mah for 15$ but that's my thoughts...
6-7 hours display of heavy straight usage over 13 hours...love my hyperion ahem both of them
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

I use the Epic Touch battery. I'm not saying anything horrid against overclocking I'm just saying cm9 works for me smooth as butter and I've found no need for it. I don't even get lag playing games like GTA3 or MC3 so I don't have a need to stress the hardware or consume more battery. To each their own but my cm9 runs just fine as is.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

Show your Antutu Score!

Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged

gozzaa said:
Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run this test just because I was bored. But our phone is ''NOT'' in the list. Its a different phone called wildfire ''S''
But there are many ways that can improve your score on the app (Don't see the point tho as phone is so old and without gpu) try different gov's eg. Performance and you can get a faster sd card eg class 10 (as it collects points for sd reads and writes)

My Antutu score is 932
CM7 build 14 (I find it the most stable one out there)
CPU MAX 768
CPU MIN 748
PERFORMANCE Governor
Compcache 18%
JIT enabled
Surface dithering enabled
Purging of assists enabled
VM HEAP SIZE 32m
Sent from my CM7 powered HTC Wildfire.

Some Info
you can compare wildfires once you have benchmarked your own, under the ranking category, top at the mo seems to have a score of 6126 but that also has a CPU speed of 1200 MHz otherwise there are more realistic ones further down, but i mannaged 1087 score with my wildfire which is still on a stock ROM lol, but as stated SD card makes a difference, i have installed an 8Gb class 10 samsung and modified the cache. But none the less, i have a lot of apps and not much RAM free so i found my score supprising compared with other wildfires. And remember, benchmarks dont represent ability in day to day use or even heavy use, they just give a theoretical overview.
But if you do want to improve your wildfire with visible results and not just numbers, i would recommend some of the below
A Class 10 Memory Card
Increase the cashe size of the memory card (improves Read/Write) but not too far i have found problems at higher values apps like SD speed boost are nice
Task Killer, automatic ones are good and save you effort :L
Overclock and undervolt with a governor appropriate for your use, this gives massively improved performance on demand and save battery when that performance is not required
New ROM, athough i have not done this personaly there are many a report of speed improvements due to less bloatware on ROM's like cyanogenmod
Move apps to SD not so much a speed thing but if you have a fast card then it saves internal space with no loss in performance
Apps like Optimize toolbox, Set CPU and memory booster helped with these.
so i am sure if i flashed a new ROM i could get my score up to 1100 at least if not further and there are things i have not tried yet so i would not say a score of 1200 is out of reach and you could probably go further, but not 6126 as antutu seems to think :L
if there is anything i have missed please tell me and i will add to the list, hope this helps

Mine tested for fun as I don't give a monkeys about it.
HTC wildfire: LeWaOs

Too lazy to screenshot
Score: 856
ROM: KoolSense
CPU:352-710MHz interactive governor

Rempuzzle, 748-768 performance, however I normally use 176-768 conservative.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

My total score was 958 using cm7 rc3
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

Using Rempuzzle 2.71
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2

usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium

usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

nejc121 said:
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Scratch0805 said:
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
I think mine dropped after I installed many apps, during my "app rush" stage. That was when I was so crazy about apps since I had to limit myself on the Wildfire or I'd have to sacrifice one app to get another lol!
Maybe when I root this phone, after it gets Revolutionary S-OFF (Only option is HTCDev now which I don't trust) I can get TrickDroid or the unofficial CM9 Alpha10!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2

My score: 1067
Oxygen 2.3.2 with Juwe Ram script
768-176 performance
normal i use 729-518 SmartassV2
score: 1062

usaff22 said:
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:

nejc121 said:
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium

Justice™ said:
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually for the Novo7 Aurora, but the tablets are practically the same, save for the IPS display on the Aurora.
There's also a Ubuntu and ICS dualboot ROM, but that one does need a hardware keyboard atleast once (Just for the first login, you can get an onscreen one later)
Otherwise, the Elf II did come out recently, but that one doesn't have any ROMs yet :silly:

Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.

Scratch0805 said:
Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So was it underclocked at first or was it the stock clockspeed and you wanted to OC it?

It has a Mali 400 if I'm not mistaken, just downloaded ex tweaks to setup something else and noticed the Max gpu speed was 276 so it must have got underclocked somewhere along the way.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

[NOOK HD+] those with cm 10.1.3 post benchmarks?

Those of you who are running CM 10.1.3 stable or nightlys can you post scores of benchmarks such as antutu ver 3.3.2 - 3.5, quadrant, 3dmark, androbench?
Want to compare scores from CM 10.1.3 with stock version 2.1.1 to see if there is any major improvement or difference. Also is battery life better, the same or worse comparing CM 10.1.3 to stock?
Also with CM 10.1.3 can you hide navigation buttons to make everything full screen when playing a game or web browsing? can you put the status bar on bottom with navigation buttons so nothing is on top? just curious...
Thank you!

I'm interested to hear this as well.
I have 10.1.3 but have not installed it.
Still running 10.1 6/30 emmc build. no complaints, but if 10.1.3 is an improvement...

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hopefully you can see this.
Default resolution
Hot plug, Deadline, purge assets, dithering set to default, 16bit transparency.
With stock Nook ROM 2.1.1 I think my best was around 2100.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk 4

CM 10.1.3
CM 10.1.3
Only preference changes where 16bit transparency and 'Allow purging of assets'.
These tests where run after the Nook was on for alitlte while and being used for a bit.
antutu
quadrant

felacio said:
Hopefully you can see this.
Default resolution
Hot plug, Deadline, purge assets, dithering set to default, 16bit transparency.
With stock Nook ROM 2.1.1 I think my best was around 2100.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got 3068 running stock.
sent by Nook HD+ using tapatalk

move_over said:
Got 3068 running stock.
sent by Nook HD+ using tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3038 vs 3068 is REALLY splitting hairs.
Did you turn on GPU Rendering to do that?

felacio said:
Did you turn on GPU Rendering to do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is and where is that ?
So far im pretty happy with how my Nook runs (but its the only tablet ive used and owned) but if there are ways to make it run smother, id like to give it a shot.

Settings > developer options > force GPU rendering.
It forces the gpu to render 2D objects as opposed to the cpu doing it. (I'm assuming)
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

to my knowledge you can't access those settings on stock nook but i would love to be able to. for me i got 2985 running 2.1.1

smatticus said:
to my knowledge you can't access those settings on stock nook but i would love to be able to. for me i got 2985 running 2.1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right, only with CM roms can you do that. Be nice to have more options like that on stock. But I'm pretty satisfied with stock so far, with root and 3rd party app install enabled.
sent by Nook HD+ using tapatalk

Thanks guys for the shots to compare stock 2.1.1 with!
I have to admit my new nook hd+ manufactured I assume not to long ago, has been pretty dam smooth and snappy and no lag what so ever!
In androbench I get some amazing scores since I have a new off the press Toshiba 16gb chip inside. Fast random reads and writes! This helps the nook hd tremendously. Also I use novo launcher, wifi set to sleep after stock 15 minute time frame although need an app to adjust that on stock, everything tweaked as far as I can do in stock and pretty dam good for a 9 inch 1920x1200 tablet with a 6000mah battery that so far after 3-4 full discharges and charges I got 7 hours and 30 minutes screen time using it off and on for 3 days and 17 hours (screen little less than half brightness). Must have a good battery inside as well.
Cannot beat the price for 149.00 dollars plus tax. Also it gets a better 3d score using the PowerVR SGX 544 gpu in quadrant at the native resolution than other tablets with high res screens. Also it beats a Nexus 7 1st generation and the Sero 7 in the 3dmark benchmark on extreme preset (at higher res). Not bad!

Is there a way to tell the manufacturer/details of the 16 GB internal memory? I have already purchased 2 refurb HD+'s and have a 3rd on order. My kids love 'em (and I do too)!
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app

I'm running 10.1 6/30 build and got quadrant score of 2600

Download Vellamo benchmark from Google Play, you can side swipe the screens and menus in program, one of the screens shows your device in purple and system information and you click or touch that and scroll down the system info and you'll see brand name and revision code of your built in storage.
mgoblue62 said:
Is there a way to tell the manufacturer/details of the 16 GB internal memory? I have already purchased 2 refurb HD+'s and have a 3rd on order. My kids love 'em (and I do too)!
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

skyhawk21 said:
Download Vellamo benchmark from Google Play, you can side swipe the screens and menus in program, one of the screens shows your device in purple and system information and you click or touch that and scroll down the system info and you'll see brand name and revision code of your built in storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tip!. I see that I have the Samsung MAG2GA. Is there anything I need to be concerned about with running CM 10.1.3?
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app

Don't run lagfix or enable trim support because samsung emmc is not compatible and will hardlock the nook due to corruption!
mgoblue62 said:
Thanks for the tip!. I see that I have the Samsung MAG2GA. Is there anything I need to be concerned about with running CM 10.1.3?
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

skyhawk21 said:
Don't run lagfix or enable trim support because samsung emmc is not compatible and will hardlock the nook due to corruption!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmmm. I've already run lagfix a couple of times - hope it hasn't caused any damage.
It's a shame there isn't a manufacturer fix for this that can be applied, as is sometimes the case with SSDs.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app

pdx1138 said:
I'm running 10.1 6/30 build and got quadrant score of 2600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ran it again with force gpu render on for 2D and score went just over 3000

Antutu with Samsung 13376
Antutu with Sandisk memory 13475
Not sure how much of the performance difference may be attributed to the memory type.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda app-developers app

Maximizing the X Play - GeekBrnch3

Hi all,
I've recently installed the overclocked kernel from squid and am having some trouble reaching the same benchmarks that he has hit. I am running stock MM with row 128 I/O and adreno-tz on the GPU. CPU is lionfish with min frequencies 800 on both clusters. I think squid is running CM13.
I consistently score between 680-740 single and 2680-2800 multi. Does this look about right for stock MM with the overlooked kernel?
Any help maximizing this would be greatly appreciated. I know these scores have (probably) very little to do with real-world use but if I can get more out of my device then why not.
Thank you for any insight!

XxMikeMasterxX said:
Hi all,
I've recently installed the overclocked kernel from squid and am having some trouble reaching the same benchmarks that he has hit. I am running stock MM with row 128 I/O and adreno-tz on the GPU. CPU is lionfish with min frequencies 800 on both clusters. I think squid is running CM13.
I consistently score between 680-740 single and 2680-2800 multi. Does this look about right for stock MM with the overlooked kernel?
Any help maximizing this would be greatly appreciated. I know these scores have (probably) very little to do with real-world use but if I can get more out of my device then why not.
Thank you for any insight!
EDIT: Moderator - could you please edit the title of the post and correct the typo? GeekBench, not Brnch. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try with simple on demand in gpu.
I will try this app today.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk

K.khiladi said:
Try with simple on demand in gpu.
I will try this app today.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey pal. Thanks for your feedback. Nice to see your response. I'll try it out as you suggest. I've been running a bunch of tests and it's looking like I hover around 740-50 single and 2700-50 multi. I've changed the configuration to default squid, so interactive governor and aggressive frequency settings. Needless to say the performance sure is snappy. Hahaha.
I'll likely revert to lionfish 800 on both clusters but this interactive snappiness is tempting...

Exactly 700 and 2700 with the oc kernel, stock brazil mm. Not even kidding. Although i sincerely doubt anything but a "native" extension can accurately measure a device performance, there is too much virtual machine and abstractions between hardware and software. Then again, this limitation applies to almost all apps, eg the normal usecase...

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My score
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk

K.khiladi said:
My score
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks to be about mine as well. What's your setup?
I got similar scores with lionfish, 800 both clusters. OCed kernel.

AtomicStryker said:
Exactly 700 and 2700 with the oc kernel, stock brazil mm. Not even kidding. Although i sincerely doubt anything but a "native" extension can accurately measure a device performance, there is too much virtual machine and abstractions between hardware and software. Then again, this limitation applies to almost all apps, eg the normal usecase...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your setup, Atomic?

Running
Temasek's CM 4.1
OC Kernel with interactive and row 256kbps

XxMikeMasterxX said:
Looks to be about mine as well. What's your setup?
I got similar scores with lionfish, 800 both clusters. OCed kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interactive. Base frequencies on both clusters 200. Overcharged squid kernel.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 09:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:08 PM ----------
TxaEkis said:
Running
Temasek's CM 4.1
OC Kernel with interactive and row 256kbps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm seems to be set for higher benchmarks.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk

Yeah does it ever. Stock gives me max 770 single 2815 multi. I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle of ROM switching to get those extra points. Would I really see the performance difference?
Although I am tempted to try a new ROM. Would be fun...so long as I use Titanium Backup properly. Hahaha

XxMikeMasterxX said:
Yeah does it ever. Stock gives me max 770 single 2815 multi. I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle of ROM switching to get those extra points. Would I really see the performance difference?
Although I am tempted to try a new ROM. Would be fun...so long as I use Titanium Backup properly. Hahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are happy with stock don't bother as you won't even notice those extra points in the benchmark. I changed roms for the extra features and cm themes and i was getting random lag until i changed to interactive and row, now is very smooth and zero lag

TxaEkis said:
If you are happy with stock don't bother as you won't even notice those extra points in the benchmark. I changed roms for the extra features and cm themes and i was getting random lag until i changed to interactive and row, now is very smooth and zero lag
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interactive is a great governor yeah. Thanks for your response regarding the ROM. I hear that CM13 is still a little shaky on the X Play but maybe I'll try the next release just to compare. I'll try a full discharge from 100% with default squid's OC kernel values. If I can still get >7 hours SOT with that setup and snappy performance I'll be thrilled.

XxMikeMasterxX said:
Yeah does it ever. Stock gives me max 770 single 2815 multi. I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle of ROM switching to get those extra points. Would I really see the performance difference?
Although I am tempted to try a new ROM. Would be fun...so long as I use Titanium Backup properly. Hahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is miniscule difference. It doesn't create a great performance difference between stock and custom Roms. The benchmarks most of the time shows the raw power of the device but the optimisation of the software also is needed.
You can try custom Roms to get extra functionality but there are still bugs in them.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk

K.khiladi said:
This is miniscule difference. It doesn't create a great performance difference between stock and custom Roms. The benchmarks most of the time shows the raw power of the device but the optimisation of the software also is needed.
You can try custom Roms to get extra functionality but there are still bugs in them.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nicely said. Performance and stability are key for me. Battery life too. Haha. I just love the X Play for that battery. 5 hours SOT and 21%. So lovely.

I had carefully tuned CM13 to get the best performance out of this device, so it and derivatives will give better performance than the defaults in stock. You can see some of my configuration here: https://github.com/moto8916/android_device_motorola_lux/blob/cm-13.0/rootdir/etc/init.target.rc Beyond that, some higher level parts of the ROM are better optimized on custom ROMs than stock, so that also improves performance.
For reference, here is my last score with the new (OC) kernel:

squid2 said:
I had carefully tuned CM13 to get the best performance out of this device, so it and derivatives will give better performance than the defaults in stock. You can see some of my configuration here: https://github.com/moto8916/android_device_motorola_lux/blob/cm-13.0/rootdir/etc/init.target.rc Beyond that, some higher level parts of the ROM are better optimized on custom ROMs than stock, so that also improves performance.
For reference, here is my last score with the new (OC) kernel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey squid,
Looks interesting. I think CM13 is definitely worth a look. I think I'll try the next release. Thanks for explaining the customizations/optimizations you've done.

Frankly, i couldn't care less about some number a synthetic benchmark spits out. The number 1 consideration is how long the battery lasts, then (a long way off) how quickly "heavy" apps such as firefox launch. Last i read CM13 isn't as good as stock at conserving power.

AtomicStryker said:
Frankly, i couldn't care less about some number a synthetic benchmark spits out. The number 1 consideration is how long the battery lasts, then (a long way off) how quickly "heavy" apps such as firefox launch. Last i read CM13 isn't as good as stock at conserving power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life is quintessential for me, too. I was hoping to strike a balance between performance and battery (hence the Optimal Setup thread) and am still trying to discern what the best setup is to meet my requirements.
I'd like to try a custom ROM at some point, but that's my curiosity more than anything.
Battery life on the X Play can't be beat! That's why I got it.

Moto x play is no slough, I just ran a test between my nexus 6 and MXP,
Most apps actually open faster on the moto x.
Scrolling through Web pages and g+ the nexus 6 is smoother

flashallthetime said:
Moto x play is no slough, I just ran a test between my nexus 6 and MXP,
Most apps actually open faster on the moto x.
Scrolling through Web pages and g+ the nexus 6 is smoother
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. I'd expect that. Still though - if properly customized this phone can really fly.