I've read that a hardware update is announced for the Oppo Find 5. Now he has a Snapdragon CPU 600 and also a new Adreno 320 GPU with 96 ALU cores instead of 64 ALU cores. So my question is: When will it be released internationally?
never.
its only for a chinese provider.
or you have to ask Oppo when a product will be launched
Related
Just got my Find 5 (few months old with CM 10.1 installed) and according to "CPU Identifier" app, it has a Snapdragon 600 (8064T) processor, a quick Google reveals that Oppo released a Find 5TD in China a few months back with the 600 clocking @ 1.7 Ghz.
Antutu says my max clock speed is 1.512 Ghz though.
Maybe "CPU Indentifier" is telling lies or maybe CM 10 is holding back my processor speed cos it thinks its a Snapdragon S4.
If it was CPU z then it will say that. Same thing happened on my nexus 4.
But I am told some of the oppo find 5s where updated
Sent from that one guy with the cool phone
If I helped you hit that Thanks button!
Yes, this is possible, due the fact that OPPO has upgraded soms Find 5's. But I thought they where all set on 1.5Ghz, if you want to can install a custom kernel and clock it right to 1.7Ghz.
Just installed CPU Identifier and I've got also a Snapdragon 600! AWESOME!
where did you guys buy your oppo find 5's from? I read that they refreshed it with the snapdragon, but all the places that sell it still list the old specs
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Refr...m-Snapdragon-600-chip-and-Android-4.2_id44879
http://oppostyle.com/home/9-find-5-midnight.html
Actually the updated Find 5 has the same processor as the Nexus 7 (2013), it's an underclocked Snapdragon 600, but on paper it's a S4 Pro Krait 300.
really ? one more thread about it ..... no and no.
Oppo Find 5 is a APQ8064 SoC , which is a Snapdragon S4 Pro
Its not one of those :
APQ8064T
APQ8064AB
APQ8064M
Find5 SoC is the same as Sony Xperia Z. All about the S600 SoC in a find5 is just rumours and have never been proven that it was correct
anders3408 said:
really ? one more thread about it ..... no and no.
Oppo Find 5 is a APQ8064 SoC , which is a Snapdragon S4 Pro
Its not one of those :
APQ8064T
APQ8064AB
APQ8064M
Find5 SoC is the same as Sony Xperia Z. All about the S600 SoC in a find5 is just rumours and have never been proven that it was correct
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine has a Snapdragon S4 @ 1.51. I use cpu-z.
With some kernels you should go up to 1.9GHz... but IMHO OC on these devices is useless.
Hi guys,
I am going to buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 soon. However the variant which is available to me is the N900 with the Exynos 5420 processor.
The thing is that, I am a bit confused about the GP. It is running a Mali-T628 MP instead of the Adreno 330 on the N9005 models. Will I notice a visible difference in gaming? Is the Mali that bad against the latest Adreno.
Also, do you think that the HMP patch that Samsung hinted at, to unleash the true 8 cores might affect the GPU performance later on?
The processor is the only thing that is stopping me from getting this variant. Please guys, help me out on this.
anir1.618 said:
Hi guys,
I am going to buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 soon. However the variant which is available to me is the N900 with the Exynos 5420 processor.
The thing is that, I am a bit confused about the GP. It is running a Mali-T628 MP instead of the Adreno 330 on the N9005 models. Will I notice a visible difference in gaming? Is the Mali that bad against the latest Adreno.
Also, do you think that the HMP patch that Samsung hinted at, to unleash the true 8 cores might affect the GPU performance later on?
The processor is the only thing that is stopping me from getting this variant. Please guys, help me out on this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adreno 330 is so good but
Mali in note3 is Octa GPU and clocked higher than adreno 330 (u can find and compare by wikipedia)
both of them are so powerful however adreno shows more score in graphic benchmark but it s not that high but cpu in exynos is about 2000scores more than snapdragon (in antutu benchmark)
anyway u won't lose anything if buy snap or exynos both of them are awesome
:good:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Simple question, I purchased a Moto G GPE and its on its way but i have the curiosity about how the SOC Snapdragon 400 Cuad Core compares to something like the S4 Pro that was in the Nexus 4 which ran great. I know its a newer chip but i havent found any real evidence whether the architecture is superior or inferior to the S4 Pro since it was a flagship chip but the 400 is budget. Anyone has any insight on this? Thanks.
best way to compare the two.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)
mike21pr said:
Simple question, I purchased a Moto G GPE and its on its way but i have the curiosity about how the SOC Snapdragon 400 Cuad Core compares to something like the S4 Pro that was in the Nexus 4 which ran great. I know its a newer chip but i havent found any real evidence whether the architecture is superior or inferior to the S4 Pro since it was a flagship chip but the 400 is budget. Anyone has any insight on this? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon 400 is positioned more like S4 Plus, not Pro. As in marketing positioning.
Speaking in technical terms however, those two SoCs have a completely differnet architecture. S4 Plus always has Krait cores, while our S400 has Cortex-A7 cores, which is generally somewhat slower than Krait, partially because Krait is an Out-of-Order architecture, while Cortex-A7 is In-Order.
In terms of cores S4 Plus always had two cores (up to 1,5 GHz), while our S400 has four cores @ 1,2 GHz.
Now go figure what´s faster. I´d personally prefer two Kraits
Note: Qualcom had really messed up the naming in S400 series as the chips can contain either two Krait cores or four Cortex-A7 cores. Don´t get me wrong, Cortex-A7 is a great architecture , mostly because its performance/power consumption ratio, but the SoCs containg those cores should have been labeled as Snapdragon 350 or something like that.
Hello, I am wanting to purchase this cool phone which features a octa core processor and has 13 MP camera rear and 5mp front facing camera.
It has also got a big touch screen and comes with Android 4.2 installed.
I have some questions regarding this phone before I buy it.
Questions:
- What is the GPU of the phone and how many CORES does it use?
- What is the clock speed of the gpu or each cores and what model is the video chip made from?
- How much video memory does the phone use in it's chip?
- On goo phone's website the price is $240.00 but im not sure if that is the same price in Australia. Is that phone $240 in AUD or is it a USA site instead or is it listed as cheap because it is in china and for Australian people they must use a currency changer?
I want to know what the DPI of the screen is and also I want to know if the phone is water and dust resistant or not.
I REALLY NEED THIS PHONE because it is a very cheap 8 CPU powered phone but I am unsure if $240 AUD is going to be the price for this phone. Has any one bought a model just like this one for the same price but less cpu's say a quad core model but a 8 core model would cost around $400???
Im not sure and that's why I ask here.
HOw about the android operating system? I Know it is 4.2 but is it kitkat or is it upgradable to kitkat?
Would I be able to execute playstation mobile on it? - you don't hve to answere this question but if you know any thing more please tell me
If you're in aus, I'd look at the much nicer Moto G, octa core isn't everything and you're likely to get better performance from the quad core in the G than any Chinese octa core phone.
Sent from my Xperia Z using XDA Premium HD app
Why is 8 core not better then a quad core cortex A7 cpu?
Do you know the video chip of the goophone s4 max? I have purchased it but im not sure what the price will come on my credit card as in AUD that's were worries me that I may be charged more then the amount said on the site's webpage.
If you know more about the goophone s4 max and what I have asked can you please put it here, I DO NOT want any other phone except for the 8 core one because that is definitely faster RIGHT since it has a faster 2.0GHz clock speed and 8 cores means it is faster
Hello,
i want a amoled screen for my next phone, with complete options, infrared, nfc, wirless charging (it optional but exist), 2 Gb og ram, removable battery, sd card slot, and for its accesoiry.. etc
i think that s4 answer to my needs.
But, i hesitate because of stocks updates, its 2013 models, and become old!
My question is if s4 is still worth this position on the 2015, and if there is equivalent new phone (full option) to him, for 300 euro budget
Thank for your answers and sorry for english
OTA_ said:
Hello,
i want a amoled screen for my next phone, with complete options, infrared, nfc, wirless charging (it optional but exist), 2 Gb og ram, removable battery, sd card slot, and for its accesoiry.. etc
i think that s4 answer to my needs.
But, i hesitate because of stocks updates, its 2013 models, and become old!
My question is if s4 is still worth this position on the 2015, and if there is equivalent new phone (full option) to him, for 300 euro budget
Thank for your answers and sorry for english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GT-I9515 (GALAXY S4 VE) in my opinion :highfive:.
Well, the S4 GT-I9506 seems to have hardware that can somewhat match the latest models
S4 GT-I9506 specs:
Chipset: Qualcomm MSM8974 Snapdragon 800
CPU : Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400
GPU : Adreno 330
Internal 16/32 GB, 2 GB RAM
And in comparison, the S5 specs:
Chipset Qualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801
CPU Quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400
GPU Adreno 330
Internal 16/32 GB, 2 GB RAM
As you can see, there is not a huge difference. The newer chipset model and 200Hz more processing power. But I don't think those 200Hz will make any big impact on performance. If it's going to be any performance differences then it's because of the newer chipset and maybe ram speeds.
Though the normal S4 GT-I9505 is still a good competitor today. Many people still use it as you can probably see by the activity on this forum.
It can still keep up with today's requirements. And it will for another 1-2 years at least.
If developers made apps only for the high-end smartphones then only those who can afford those kind of phones can use the app. And that's just not profitable for them, right?