Database Users

[Quadrant Scores] Thread!

I dont think we have a quadrant score thread.
Lets start it up!!
Rules:
Post your Quadrant Pic (No pic, didnt happen )
and tell us what ROM and Kernel you are using.

I hear Quadrant isn't as accurate as it could be, but I'll go along.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This was one of the CM7 Nightlies and I believe, Miguel's kernel.

Idk about this man. Alot of people are skeptical at the accuracy of quadrant to include me
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

cm7, no OC, but using data2ext
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

This is why. The numerous random mis-benching.
It's always either underrated or overrated depending on how your set up is.
There are better tests out there.
CM6, smartass, dtapps.

Yeah a bit unreliable because I doubt my phone can outperform an Evo but, 1360 so...
With CM7 (Ungodly fast BTW) And Miguels Kernel OC'd at MAX 864 MIN 245 SETCPU
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

That's what I usually get with CM7 nightly + miguelthekernel Smartass 245-844Mhz + data2ext.

What the heck. My score is significantly less than everyone here. I only got 988 and I'm using CM7 nightly with miguelthe kernal and smartass 245-825. Any idea why it'd be so slow?
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

Try to free up some RAM with a task manager, you should get about 1200 with 825 oc, I used to get 1185 yet on CM 6.x. data2ext would significally increase your I/O score. Look at my screenshot above.

F0rgiven said:
What the heck. My score is significantly less than everyone here. I only got 988 and I'm using CM7 nightly with miguelthe kernal and smartass 245-825. Any idea why it'd be so slow?
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't actually make those scores anymore for a while I was hittin mid 900's then back up to 1000s... But never that high again D:

My results/stats are attached...too bad I didn't have a screenie program earlier, I got it up to 3328, and can't reproduce it again.

CaptainPointless said:
My results/stats are attached...too bad I didn't have a screenie program earlier, I got it up to 3328, and can't reproduce it again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This might be in the wrong forum. Glacier is the MT4G.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk

No pic but I average 1400-1500 with latest cm7 nightlies, smartass kernel , and data2ext

I keep seeing people post about smartass kernel and getting high scores. I keep getting scores in the 800d's, could somebody please point in the right direction in getting smartass kernel right now I have 2.6.32.17 cyanogenmod running CM7.
Thanks-

data2ext and being overclocked get you the high quadrant score not smartass. I get the same scores with the kernel included in cm7. Smartass just gets rid of the need for setcpu profiles

sbell7105 said:
data2ext and being overclocked get you the high quadrant score not smartass. I get the same scores with the kernel included in cm7. Smartass just gets rid of the need for setcpu profiles
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I'm not mistaken doesn't CM7 already come with data2ext installed, because I see that I can move apps to the sd card. Also how would one know what apps are ok to be moved?
Thanks-

cdsbj6508 said:
If I'm not mistaken doesn't CM7 already come with data2ext installed, because I see that I can move apps to the sd card. Also how would one know what apps are ok to be moved?
Thanks-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
apps2sd FAT, not EXT.

Data2ext is different than app2ext it completely frees up your internal storage search in the development section

feel so slow
These scores make me want to get a new SD card and do some apps2ext to see how much nicer it will make my phone (not bad btw).

[Q] Vellamo benchmarking ROM comparison on SGS2

With the release of Vellamo I thought it would be worth bench marking some of the SGS2 ROMS available. Post below for comparisons (use menu -> last numbers for detailed breakdown)
Search Vellamo on the marketplace. (unable to post links yet)
ROM: Stock I9100XWKF1 [2.3.3]
Total Score = 950
See The Sun Canvas base score = 86.27
Deep Sea Canvas base score = 123.35
Aquarium Canvas base score = 92.18
Pixel Blender base score = 94.16
Surf Wax Binder base score = 52.14
Sun Spider base score = 92.29
V8 Benchmark base score 84.75
Ocean Flinger Base score = 90.52
Image Flinger base score = 35.22
Text Flinger base score = 50.02
Network loader base score = 152.82

Mine. 941.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The Sensation people are pissed because they're only getting 7-800ish and its a Qualcomm benchmark. Check out the Atrix. Eww.

The first test I ran I got 940-ish.
Then I rebootes the device, overclocked to 1.4 GHz and...
Score: 1047! Even above the Galaxy Tab! SGS2 FTW

Mine was at stock clock. I really don't feel any need to overclock this device.

XDA mark said:
The first test I ran I got 940-ish.
Then I rebootes the device, overclocked to 1.4 GHz and...
Score: 1047! Even above the Galaxy Tab! SGS2 FTW
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you on?

I got a lowly 904 on mine...sniff sniff

I suppose the benchmark is not affected by the deodexed browser lag, because I got 920 on darky's KG1 (with browser fix which disables acceleration).

Done a reboot and ran again and got a better score of 933
Running stock UK KF3 firmware

1065 for me using Lite 2.2 tweaked to 1300.
But remember guys..... These are only numbers and usability depends on the user.
D
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App

BarryH_GEG said:
Mine. 941.
Y
The Sensation people are pissed because they're only getting 7-800ish and its a Qualcomm benchmark. Check out the Atrix. Eww.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah check out the Atrix, it has GB.....oh wait.
Shows the credibility of this benchmark.
This is probably one of the worst ones to come out in a long time.
Inaccurate and useless.

my score is : 913.

KingKuba13 said:
Yeah check out the Atrix, it has GB.....oh wait.
Shows the credibility of this benchmark.
This is probably one of the worst ones to come out in a long time.
Inaccurate and useless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://briefmobile.com/download-android-2-3-4-gingerbread-for-motorola-atrix-4g

Test
Using Lite`ning rom v2.2 kernel xxkg1, android 2.3.4
Total score: 914

awjunk said:
What ROM are you on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock.. I only rooted. I used Tegrak app to overclock to 1.4 GHz

i am on 1167, faster than the TAB.
I am on Cognition 1.31, ninphetamine 2.0.5+
using JD to OC up to 1.6 ondemand.
Quadrant score = 3850.
Abandond Lite'ning at 4.0 for Cognition 1.31 while waiting for stable CM7

Share your benchmark score! (any application test you want)

I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5

theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?

Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.

Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz

CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)

Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?

Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)

vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?

Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart

Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points

For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.

vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?

k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.

Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!

@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point

What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.

Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Benchmarks results

Hi guys, I have an arc S from a few weeks, after several tests I found a rom that flies in quadrant, these are the results:
4030 pts without overclocking
4739 pts with overclocking @ 2000 (v15 doom-Kernel)
All the other roms, including Cyanogen v 7.2, have a maximum in 2200-2500 pts.
The rom is SE-tweaked.
How can this difference in performance?

i bet that the guy that made that rom included the quadrant hack, nothin special imo.

probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.

johnbarleycorn said:
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try antutu benchmark and nenamark 2.

antutu 3500-3600 pts
nenamark2 14.8.
The quandrant booster apk not change the results.

With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

Flo95 said:
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@1.4 without Supercharger V6.

Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

Flo95 said:
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got 3924 @ 1.6 GHz smartassV2 on my Arc S.

Nice, what ROM do you use?
Even if Benchmarks say nothing about real use, it's nice to compare
Yesterday I made one test @ 1.8GHz and scored 4285 points
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

Look in the signature, same ROM you're using.
I'll try 1,8 GHz too, but 2 GHz not any more, seems like my CPU can't handle it.
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium

Nice, sorry. Tapatalk doesn't display signature so I can't see them.
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?

arneh1992 said:
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's totally normal to have that score.
The guy just used the quadrant hack, if you run different benchmarks (e.g. AnTuTu, Vellamo, etc.) you'll notice that your device is nearly the same to other results.

Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...

arneh1992 said:
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is maximum?
Quadrant scores between 1800 and 2400 are normal imo.

I mean like, cause i use arconium, doomkernel and supercharger i thought it would be faster... But getting scores around the 2000 is the maximum for me, or can i get it higher( without overclocking more )? I wanna play a lot of games with minimum lag

Quadrant scores say nothing!
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

Well i dont really know why but my Arc with doomkernel v15 @1.6GHz hit the score of 3982 at Antutu benchmark.. Maybe is the sd booster i use..
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App

My V6 custom ROM - NOT released V6 yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Benchmark thread for Note II, Post screen shots

Hello everyone
I started this thread to see our lovely note 2 performance in benchmark apps, please mention if u running on Stock ROM or Custom Rom
here's mine, Stock Not Rooted 4.1.1:
AnTuTu:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quadrant:
Vellamo:
NenaMark2:
Hope to see ur results

Completely Stock 4.1.2

^^^^
I see an improvement in 4.1.2, browser and graphics, 1000 more points in Quadrant, about 80 in Vellamo
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2

Mine.....
Android 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

Devashish Lodh said:
Mine.....
Android 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why the low score !!!

I don't know why everyone is obsessed with benchmark results, benchmarks offer very rough results for the estimated performance of your device. If you run any benchmark twice in a row, under the same conditions, it would give 2 completely varrying results, which clearly shows that results are very unreliable and doesn't necessarily mirror to real world performance.
My old Motorola atrix 4g which is a dual core tegra 2 android device overclocked to 1.4GHz used to score an average of 6000 on quadrant, which is pretty much around what most people get on our quad core Notes, but if you compare both phones in terms of real world performance its not even a competition, the note 2 feels 3 generations ahead.

This is mine..
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

Here's mine.
4.1.2 DLL4....XEF

Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?

Samsung Galaxy Note 2 - Jelly Bean 4.1.1
Quadrant:
Note2Core Kernel
CPU: 1920Mhz, 1425mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
AnTuTu:
Perseus Kernel
CPU: 1800Mhz, 1250mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
Geekbench 2:
Note2Core Kernel
CPU: 1920Mhz, 1425mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV

nidhish91 said:
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disable Power saving
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2

@ cyber.bg
Awesome scores
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2

to be honest, i have no idea how i scored this high. stock rom unrooted, stock clocks. i was scoring 6000 on 4.1.1, but then 4.1.2 bumped my score higher by a notable amount. i'll just assume better drivers =)

nidhish91 said:
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Change your kernel or Overclock at your own risk.

top speed award goes to me.. (NO ITS NOT HACKED)

haldi15 said:
top speed award goes to me.. (NO ITS NOT HACKED)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Godlike!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

Some of these scores are just too good to be true... :good:

Souai said:
to be honest, i have no idea how i scored this high. stock rom unrooted, stock clocks. i was scoring 6000 on 4.1.1, but then 4.1.2 bumped my score higher by a notable amount. i'll just assume better drivers =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well on antutu this new dll4 rom version raised my gpu scores a lot. So they must have done something right. Also on quadrant my fps went from 40 -> 60 with new drivers. With stock kernel and wicked rom.

Mashari_F said:
Disable Power saving
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow didnt know disabling power saver would boost my cell godlike!!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

wtf!
Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk 2