[Quadrant Scores] Thread! - myTouch 3G Slide General

I dont think we have a quadrant score thread.
Lets start it up!!
Rules:
Post your Quadrant Pic (No pic, didnt happen )
and tell us what ROM and Kernel you are using.

I hear Quadrant isn't as accurate as it could be, but I'll go along.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This was one of the CM7 Nightlies and I believe, Miguel's kernel.

Idk about this man. Alot of people are skeptical at the accuracy of quadrant to include me
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

cm7, no OC, but using data2ext
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

This is why. The numerous random mis-benching.
It's always either underrated or overrated depending on how your set up is.
There are better tests out there.
CM6, smartass, dtapps.

Yeah a bit unreliable because I doubt my phone can outperform an Evo but, 1360 so...
With CM7 (Ungodly fast BTW) And Miguels Kernel OC'd at MAX 864 MIN 245 SETCPU
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

That's what I usually get with CM7 nightly + miguelthekernel Smartass 245-844Mhz + data2ext.

What the heck. My score is significantly less than everyone here. I only got 988 and I'm using CM7 nightly with miguelthe kernal and smartass 245-825. Any idea why it'd be so slow?
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

Try to free up some RAM with a task manager, you should get about 1200 with 825 oc, I used to get 1185 yet on CM 6.x. data2ext would significally increase your I/O score. Look at my screenshot above.

F0rgiven said:
What the heck. My score is significantly less than everyone here. I only got 988 and I'm using CM7 nightly with miguelthe kernal and smartass 245-825. Any idea why it'd be so slow?
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't actually make those scores anymore for a while I was hittin mid 900's then back up to 1000s... But never that high again D:

My results/stats are attached...too bad I didn't have a screenie program earlier, I got it up to 3328, and can't reproduce it again.

CaptainPointless said:
My results/stats are attached...too bad I didn't have a screenie program earlier, I got it up to 3328, and can't reproduce it again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This might be in the wrong forum. Glacier is the MT4G.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk

No pic but I average 1400-1500 with latest cm7 nightlies, smartass kernel , and data2ext

I keep seeing people post about smartass kernel and getting high scores. I keep getting scores in the 800d's, could somebody please point in the right direction in getting smartass kernel right now I have 2.6.32.17 cyanogenmod running CM7.
Thanks-

data2ext and being overclocked get you the high quadrant score not smartass. I get the same scores with the kernel included in cm7. Smartass just gets rid of the need for setcpu profiles

sbell7105 said:
data2ext and being overclocked get you the high quadrant score not smartass. I get the same scores with the kernel included in cm7. Smartass just gets rid of the need for setcpu profiles
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I'm not mistaken doesn't CM7 already come with data2ext installed, because I see that I can move apps to the sd card. Also how would one know what apps are ok to be moved?
Thanks-

cdsbj6508 said:
If I'm not mistaken doesn't CM7 already come with data2ext installed, because I see that I can move apps to the sd card. Also how would one know what apps are ok to be moved?
Thanks-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
apps2sd FAT, not EXT.

Data2ext is different than app2ext it completely frees up your internal storage search in the development section

feel so slow
These scores make me want to get a new SD card and do some apps2ext to see how much nicer it will make my phone (not bad btw).

Related

I just got a new highest quadrant benchmark

I just got this on virtuous 3.1.0 with kings kernel BFS #5. This is the highest I've seen so I thought I should share.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
SR 3.3.2 KK #5
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
lol.
I was proud... Im now gonna try to get mine higher lol
Have y'all seen what the G2's doing overclocked? It's sick.
whats with the ads on screen shots??? your on rooted phones...ADFREE(market app)
jager420 said:
whats with the ads on screen shots??? your on rooted phones...ADFREE(market app)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually leave mine on most of the time to support the devs who hand out free apps.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Im not even getting 1200 on Redemptive 1.8. Is it purely the rom and kernel that are giving those scores? Im sure to kill any running apps via running services in the settings menu.
PonsAsinorem said:
I actually leave mine on most of the time to support the devs who hand out free apps.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha. I do that too. Even with flash and some websites.
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
RyanTX said:
Im not even getting 1200 on Redemptive 1.8. Is it purely the rom and kernel that are giving those scores? Im sure to kill any running apps via running services in the settings menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never kill apps. Which kernel are you using and what are your setcpu settings.
silverramsrt said:
I never kill apps. Which kernel are you using and what are your setcpu settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that's probably it... I have had the phone since release but have been afraid to do anything until a couple weeks ago.
I just installed my first rom - Redemptive Revolution 1.8 (love it BTW) but it came with the newest HTC kernel, so that's what I am using. I dont even have SetCPU on my phone. You think the sub 1200 is about right for not having it?
RyanTX said:
Well that's probably it... I have had the phone since release but have been afraid to do anything until a couple weeks ago.
I just installed my first rom - Redemptive Revolution 1.8 (love it BTW) but it came with the newest HTC kernel, so that's what I am using. I dont even have SetCPU on my phone. You think the sub 1200 is about right for not having it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, since you're new to this don't get caught up on numbers. Take a look at what Lou's got to say (and fwiw, I completely agree).
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8734924&postcount=1875
What app are you guys using to benchmark?
my highest benchmark has been 1710 using skyraider vanilla 3.0 and kings kernal #5/#5
Wish i had a screenshot
setexascustoms said:
Have y'all seen what the G2's doing overclocked? It's sick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is pretty sick but. I wish it was possible to clock the Inc to 1.5 gHz and be stable. Also some overclocks lately have been fake but its awesome that this one is real XD.
makos101 said:
What app are you guys using to benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The app is called "Quadrant" and you can find it in the android market. XD Theirs also "Linpack" that you can use to test out Mega Flops.
got these scores had to redo test becuase drocap didnt capture screen like i wanted as you can see.. had to use shootme for second test and score droped a little. Im on ROM The new guy v5 with the blue theme v2. with king kernal bfs #5..love the ROM
**edit
BTW i was reading above about app killing(which i usally do) and both these test were done w/o killing apps and such went straight to testing..
Uber Rom Rules!
On Uber Desire Z, I got 1745 on my incredible!!!!!!!!!!!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=861285
I got 3985 on my HTC HD2 which isn't even a native android device. lol
This is 100% legit & I currently hold the highest score I've ever seen. The system im running is in my sig & has no set cpu or overclocking enabled. It has parts of the operating system stored in the RAM which has much faster I/O than NAND.
quadrant honestly doesn't mean much

Quadrants, Benchmarks & Overclocking?? What's the difference??

Reading several different forums I keep seeing about quadrants & benchmarks. What are these used for?? I'm trying to get into overclocking and keep seeing about how there are several settings and adjustments needing to be made to find the "sweet spot" for my processor, does benchmark scores relate to overclocking?? Here is my benchmark:
Are these favorable results?? Would I need to overclock?? Would overclocking be beneficial??
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Quadrant is a benchmark tool. It tests how quickly your phone can calculate certain types of data etc.
Overclocking is what allows you to increaSe the max speed of your processor. This will usually result in a higher quadrant or benchmark tool score.
Take care with overclocking, as you can harm your device if not done correctly
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Quadrant for my X rated 1383?? Good, standard or needz improvement??
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
while we are on the topic of overclocking, can i use a fission overclock (from the fission rom manager) on my gummyjar rom on the dx?
DVS69 said:
Quadrant for my X rated 1383?? Good, standard or needz improvement??
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not too bad. Quadrant/benchmark scores aren't necessarily the best "measure" of how fast your phone is... Tweaks can be made to files to "hack" the results. In my opinion...benchmarking is more of just a bragging right for most people. If you are happy with how your phone runs, that is the important thing.
I noticed you have the framework for a Tron theme... Where did you grab that? Are you running Rubix or Apex?
(just curious...cuz I had made one, but I didn't finish the theme).
mattmartin77 said:
while we are on the topic of overclocking, can i use a fission overclock (from the fission rom manager) on my gummyjar rom on the dx?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure... I only know of jrummy's overclock... and... w.e. the other one is titled.. don't know. I would assume the one in fission is one of those two...
Someone plz correct me if I'm wrong.... (I haven't used fission).
Tron theme I grabbed from a friend who found an Apex port for DX over on droidforums. I found the Rubix link and was telling him about the theme and while looking into it he found the Apex port & using on D2 (keyboard didn't work on D2 but working fine on DX)
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Sooo, is that a yes or no on the fission overclock?
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
I use Droid Overclock off the market. Does the job well. I score 1557 @1.2Ghz on low voltage, I have not overclocked higher as 1.2ghz is not even noticable from 1 ghz. Your going purely for sythetic benchmark scores to satisfy your inner geek ocd LoL.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
nice ill try that. my phone is already wicked fast from gummyjar, but im obsessed with overclocked things
What are you using to overclock?? There's a fission one I can download from the ROM manager, I've seen in the market place one from JRummy, Unstable Apps, Milestone (free) & some joint from JPApps (QuickClock?).....which are you using & why?? Whose tried more than one overclock program & which had given you best results??
Working with Droid X
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
I use jrummys overclock on apex and have no problems with it
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Quick Clock Advanced is my overclocker of choice. It calibrates to the lowest possible vsel hour phone can handle and then you can start from there. My current settings on quick clock.
300mhz 15vsel
600mhz 30vsel
900mhz 45vsel
1200mhz 61vsel
I maxed out at 1480mhz at 80vsel which is the highest vsel the app will safely allow.
I use. JRummy Overclock also. Currently I'm overclock to 1.25ghz low voltage. Using GummyJAR2.5. My quadrant score ranges from low 1500's to high 1600's. Some times it hits as high as 1700. I actually use Quadrant Advance Edition which actually gives you a break down of different scores in different catagories. The reason why the Quadrant score goes up when you overclock is that it will boost your score in CPU catagory/section.

G2 benchmark... numbers sucked!

Just flashed enoms g2 rom and I cleared up what I can, tried making it efficient.I ran some benchmark tests on quadrant standard and was kinda disappointed in the numbers. My bests score was low 1100 after that it was 850,900, 835... very basic stuff any suggestions???
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
If you ran the benchmark on battery power, try plugging the phone in. Sometimes the CPU will underclock itself to save power. If that doesn't work, download SetCPU (google it) and make sure that the max speed is set above 800 MHz.
On the stock G2 ROM I was getting 1600-1800... maybe it's the ROM your using
omarsalmin said:
On the stock G2 ROM I was getting 1600-1800... maybe it's the ROM your using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah this is the typical range for a stock G2.
Those scores in the OP are so low, its almost like hes underclocking or something. Or possibly a running application using a ton of resources?
i got 2064. but i was running virtuous.
im running enom's rom and i had it underclocked at 768 and i was still able to get 1609
Stargazer418 said:
If you ran the benchmark on battery power, try plugging the phone in. Sometimes the CPU will underclock itself to save power. If that doesn't work, download SetCPU (google it) and make sure that the max speed is set above 800 MHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm... No... The CPU doesn't underclock to save power...
gravis86 said:
Umm... No... The CPU doesn't underclock to save power...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps the kernel has an undervolting profile built in and it's triggered by a < battery percentage?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
What should I have my phone clocked at with enoms rom?? I dnt have much running at all I dnt understand why its so slow, I was gunna flash the latest kernal and try that... clock settings please anyone
Edit: jus tweaked my clock on spareparts. I switched cpu governor from ondemand to performance and the clock setting. I put underclock at the lowest and overclock at the max highest... benchmark test put up a 2200... I feel as if this will drain battery like crazy only time will tell... what do u think, should I drop the overclock? Is it safe at that high number???
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
If I run with Flippy's kernel, CM 6.1.1 Stable and OC my phone to 1.8 GHz, I can get a Quadrant score of 3037 (screenshot below). With it OC'd to 1.4 GHz (my normal OC setting) I can get around 2500.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
If I'm averging 2500 I'm fine wit that my current settings are Enoms Rom
Using enoms cpu controls
Cpu governor: performance
Max frequency: 1,516,800
Min frequency 245,760
I dropped 3 percent in battery writing this message.... my main concern is battery and overworking the cpu.... I'm thinking about downloading set cpu and clocking the performance settings then set it for power save after a certain drop point........ does this sound logical?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
When you set your cpu to performance it means your cpu will stay at max all the time and it never goes down which is why you are getting bad battery life.
There is no need for that.
Yes you can do that with setcpu
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Maybe you tested your Samsung Galaxy s by mistake?..lol..just joking.
I score around 2500 on quadrant:
OC'd to 1.4 (normally run 1.2)
SetCpu On Demand
CyanogenMod 6.1
fablife said:
Maybe you tested your Samsung Galaxy s by mistake?..lol..just joking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey! Not funny! My vibrant gets 2035 in the quadrant! But I'm going to get myself a g2 because I miss the hardware keyboard
Got me 2813 with Virtous 0.9 <---- (sense rom btw) and eVil's latest Glacier based kernel @ 1.5ghz... life is good
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

Best Quadrant Score?

Hey guys I was just wondering what's your best Quadrant score you've had on your HD2? I got what I think is a fairly high quadrant score today and I was fairly impressed.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
i think 2300 or 2700 somewhere in between
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
You beat my score!
johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not totally irrelevant, but sometimes close to it. Quadrant standard is useless, pro is a little better.
The problem with Quadrant is:
1) Disk IO test, if you try some of the builds with very high score you'll see it's coming from IO, you can just mount that one part that Quadrant use in RAM, get crazy high score, but that won't speed up any other apps/system as you still use your NAND/SD card
2) Video speed, as on early Darkstone builds video score was very low as that build had something turned off (because with it's ON there were other bugs), but all apps were using some other API for video, so only Quadrant was slow on it
3) Quadrant tests doesn't show real system performance, so higher score might have no increase in speed in other apps. For example you can put newest CPU on your PC, but having only 256mb RAM would make everything slow, no matter how fast your CPU is, but CPU score would be higher
This doesn't mean that Quadrant is bad, in my opinion if you're using pro version and you get some component score (for example CPU score) higher on one build then on other - that's good. If you get total score higher, build might be actually slower then other build with low score.
this is the old 1.32... at 1200mhz cedes sd build.
with the new 1.72... dhd base i get max 5000 cpu points and approx 5000 I/O points with data on ext4 partition. that makes 2400 overall quadrant points. at 998 mhz. but if i put all data to nand the I/O points are 1250, but the device feels faster and boots faster. for now i only put app folder on the ext4 partition, dalvik and data remain on internal memory. i am still testing whats the best combo, it takes lot of time
johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your right there.
I don't use Quadrant much but i got over 3000 before (using Darkstones SUPERAM)
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Skellyyy said:
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
SuperNAND got about 4000.
Proof:
Someone beat this . Quadrant scores are garbage, it proves nothing.
jonny68 said:
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm on my phone right now I can't get the link but its the DHD build by Andrew something. Should be on the first page in the NAND forum.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Anyone else getting very low quadrant scores??

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is about as high a score as I get. I'm running the new EB01 ROM with CPU set to performance and 1ghz. Anyone else getting these scores?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Im only getting 1550ish with the new EB01 voodoo kernel. =/ That score you have is about what I get without voodoo on 2.2.
yeah im getting around 1500 with voodoo 2.2. I used to get over 2000 with 2.1 voodoo. Not sure what this is all about.
Quadrant standard is overrated unless you just like those pretty numbers.
ataranine said:
This is about as high a score as I get. I'm running the new EB01 ROM with CPU set to performance and 1ghz. Anyone else getting these scores?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering a actual voodoo kernel (not leak) has yet to be released, that is expected. 1Ghz is just the normal max speed for the fascinate, so nothing surprising there.
I got 966 on my first try
From my super clean dl30 fascinate
Not sure what they mean but thats what I got
From my super clean dl30 fascinate
I scores are 1051, 1089, 1092, 1042
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Kevin Gossett said:
Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
The phone runs fells like it's running faster and smoother to me than it did on 2.1 with a custom kernel. Quadrant score is lower though, so does that mean my phone is slower? No. Quadrant is just a test, its results mean absolutely nothing in terms of actual performance. If it did, that'd mean that Snapdragons are the superior CPU/GPU combo, when we all know that the Hummingbird is the most advanced chip in a phone outside of the Tegra 2.
Kevin Gossett said:
Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bragging rights..what else.
I dont care what they mean. I was just showing what I got.
From my super clean dl30 fascinate
Im getting about 1600 on eb01 on voodoo kernel without i get in the 900s but it may be because the voodoo kernel by jt is still in testing stage and he may not have it just right yet but knowing how good he is i am sure he will have it perfect soon.
I scored just over 1000 on EB01 non-voodoo but it really doesn't mean squat! I dunno why it doesn't score higher cause it fly's the way it is now... I mess with a friends Dinc all the time and I can see a huge difference in "Real World" use!
It means nothing.
Daswolven said:
It means nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha... Too funny
Benchmarking is good for 2 things, and ONLY 2 things:
1. Comparing a device to itself with different configurations to determine performance increases (like JIT vs non-JIT, voodoo vs non-voodo, etc).
2. Comparing one device to another with the same software configuration to determine build quality, find a hardware fault, etc (i.e. 2 identical SGS phones with identical software configuration, but one scores 1,500, and the other scores 600).
Other than that, benchmarks are nothing but pissing contests where one or both participants could be aiming into the wind at any given time (no matter the situation, someone ends up all wet).
Think I found an answer for you.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=11443973#post11443973
same problem on my evo.... summary = newest version of quadrant is to blame.
I was getting damn near 1600 on Jt's aosp 2.2 w/o voodoo but meh
yeah i get like 943. The quandrant scores don't lie: 2.2 has slowed our phones down immensely.

Categories

Resources