Database Users

Quadrant Scores

I just wanted to add a place where people could post and brag about their blazing fast phones! Mine was 2304!! I'm currently running a Samsung Vibrant/rooted/one click lag fix. I also have an HTC HD2 running Hyperdroid v1.6 build (flawlessly)

Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.

Use search. There was a topic about this a couple a days ago.
Score:2259
Sent from my Samsung Vibrant using the xda-developers app.

sj_martin said:
Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THIS. Indeed.

Yea they aren't precise. Its just a way to show off for no reason. Its like wearing a lot of fake gold to show you have money.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Can someone explain why Quadrant is bs? I saw a thread talking about it really doesn't "work" the phone. If that's the cade I can understand that. But isn't it a way to compare android phones? An equal set of standards and each phone
is ranked how it meets these standards. Or Is it all made up?

sj_martin said:
Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^^^^^this
actually OP change it and make a rule ....no LAG fix

Thanks for the answer.

2650 but don't know what it means so it doesn't matter to me much
Willsnews

Quadrant scores are a reference
Quadrant scores are just a benchmarking tools and should only be used as a reference, just like a Photo snapshot. It is not an end all too prove you have a fast or fastest setup, but IT does provide a general view of how your phone is performing.
Remember....... the slowest thing in the hardware or software is what will govern performance. an example of this would be in a desktop computer.... you get a super fast I-7 chip or maybe a SUN chip with 64 cpus. Great !! but you have this 8 yr old hard drive and Win 98.........that chip is useless . This is why some of the developers strive to build a efficient bug free rom that performs the same in or with all things loaded into the phone. And the developers here do a super job of building a variety of excellent performing roms.

Agreed they really do !!!
Willsnews

ntellegence said:
Can someone explain why Quadrant is bs? I saw a thread talking about it really doesn't "work" the phone. If that's the cade I can understand that. But isn't it a way to compare android phones? An equal set of standards and each phone
is ranked how it meets these standards. Or Is it all made up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://briefmobile.com/cyanogen-demonstrates-quadrants-flaws

Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Dammit2Hell said:
Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 1,200.. But I have no clue what they are doing, nor do I care

Dammit2Hell said:
Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read the post above yours, it'll tell you.

By rooting and installing the lag fix alone gets you 2100+
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

my score with " Super speedy ye-pa ye-pa speedy Gonzales lagFix
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Stock Quadrant Score with 2.2?

Hello ladies and gents of the Vibrant forum. I'm a G2 user thinking about returning his G2 tomorrow for a Vibrant. What is the Vibrant stock Quadrant score with the OTA 2.2 update? Already tried search.

The OTA was not 2.2, it was an update to 2.1.

rembonjaski said:
The OTA was not 2.2, it was an update to 2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh.
Nevermind then.

Hmmm
There's no 2.2 update yet... sorry

Are you guys serious?! Eugene released a stable 2.2 ROM this morning!
With just a stock 2.2 flash youre looking @ 980 on quad & 14.xx @ 5.9 sec on linpack.
As always though... Benchmarks dont mean jack! From personal experience this phone is awesome! If I stopped flashing it so damn much I'd be able to get 20+ hours on the battery too!

I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

disturkis4u said:
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think what the OP wanted was a 2.2 vibrant score w/ JIT enabled... eugenes ROM has it.
Stable means usable & will not die or cause nuclear war. Perfect ROM? No... Only working 2.2 ROM working (minus GPS & a few other things not working) on the vibrant, yes.
exactly what does stability & usability have to with a mathematical bench mark test? are you referring to hacks & mods vs. hard code? Stability wise? # wise??

I just got 1903 after using the z4mod (ext2) on JI6:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quite happy with that - but more happy with a somewhat useable phone!
-bZj

All~G1 said:
Are you guys serious?! Eugene released a stable 2.2 ROM this morning!
With just a stock 2.2 flash youre looking @ 980 on quad & 14.xx @ 5.9 sec on linpack.
As always though... Benchmarks dont mean jack! From personal experience this phone is awesome! If I stopped flashing it so damn much I'd be able to get 20+ hours on the battery too!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, I don't like when people put benchmarks down. I happen to believe that some of the benchmarks, including Quadrant Professional are accurate and reflective of real performance. Then again everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

disturkis4u said:
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just flashed bionix final team whiskey ,oc n everything its really really fast but I just ran a 790! Why did our run so slow? I barely have any apps on here in the first place...?

i get 900-910 with JI6 everything stock.
edit
sorry OP wants Score with 2.2

down8 said:
I just got 1903 after using the z4mod (ext2) on JI6:
Quite happy with that - but more happy with a somewhat useable phone!
-bZj
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly what i was about to say. who cares about 2.2 when you can flash a bionix rom and hit up to 2600 on quadrant. not that quadrant really means anything more than a benchmark.

I think OP is looking for a official froyo 2.2 rom...Sorry OP, no official froyo, but there is a ported version eugene has done.
Click here
Although this is a "froyo", no one is sure if this can be an accurate representation of how our vibrants will run when we get the official OTA, but if you want "froyo" now, by all means go ahead and flash it. Its still missing a few kinks and has bugs.

Quadrant score on vibrant with 2.3

just wanted to share my results with i9000 2.3 ROM on My Vibrant
here is what i got ....Note the CPU score !!
also note high I/O because i have voodoo lagfix
so should avr same as NS around 1700 stock
Nice CPU score
3D is low because quadrant has issues rendering 3D correctly with 2.3
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

This is very happy news. What is linpack saying?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Sorry I meant to post in general...please move

Gomjabar said:
This is very happy news. What is linpack saying?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as NS 14-15

Is the i9000 2.3 made from the nexus s or is it from an official release for i9000?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk

jmatic said:
Is the i9000 2.3 made from the nexus s or is it from an official release for i9000?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
made from aosp 2.3 source code & possibly bits from nexus s dump

But how does the Scorpion score on 2.3?
This is excellent news, means the Dalvik Jit compiler is finally optimized to give the Hummingbird a performance boost.
But, what if this excitment is pre-mature? I want to see the nexus ONE(scorpion phone) running 2.3, what if 2.3 on a scorpion boosts their performance even more than it already did on 2.2!
Lets compare 2.3 vibrant to 2.3 scorpion, then we will know!

SamsungVibrant said:
This is excellent news, means the Dalvik Jit compiler is finally optimized to give the Hummingbird a performance boost.
But, what if this excitment is pre-mature? I want to see the nexus ONE(scorpion phone) running 2.3, what if 2.3 on a scorpion boosts their performance even more than it already did on 2.2!
Lets compare 2.3 vibrant to 2.3 scorpion, then we will know!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Scorpion is not on the nexus one
Also Quadrant doesn't test MFLOPS... linpack does
The purpose of my post to show the galaxy S phones take advantage of JIT just like the NS..even though we pretty much knew this
The scorpion CPU is nothing more than a snapdragon with updated adreno GPU will pretty much have same linpack score as N1 snapdragon

this is great, but now i want the official gingerbread, when will samsung end the misery of consumers?!?!?

Awesome, thanks for the pic.

LOL @ no signal, are you sure your not on a iphone?

xriderx66 said:
LOL @ no signal, are you sure your not on a iphone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It needs a sim card to get a signal

demo23019 said:
It needs a sim card to get a signal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh.. ha jokes on me.

Upload CWM or ODIN version of this rom so we can do this too ?
I am assuming that this rom has taken supercurio's development further along

demo23019 said:
Scorpion is not on the nexus one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, I meant snapdragon.

ozmulti said:
Upload CWM or ODIN version of this rom so we can do this too ?
I am assuming that this rom has taken supercurio's development further along
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this is supercurio's rom. He's simply showing the performance results of it. There is no fully functional Gingerbread rom for SGS phones yet. However, if supercurio continues at this pace, it may not be much longer

Thanks a lot for sharing this... although, you've just made the wait that much harder.

Wow if its true.I had similar cpu reading in quadrant while testing cm6 beta3 also.i even posted it here in excitement but later came to know that it excluded h264 test to get the inflated results...hope its not the same with gb port.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk

Ok noob question......how do I figure out my score....
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Is It the Demo or something?

Best Quadrant Score?

Hey guys I was just wondering what's your best Quadrant score you've had on your HD2? I got what I think is a fairly high quadrant score today and I was fairly impressed.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

i think 2300 or 2700 somewhere in between

I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.

You beat my score!

johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not totally irrelevant, but sometimes close to it. Quadrant standard is useless, pro is a little better.
The problem with Quadrant is:
1) Disk IO test, if you try some of the builds with very high score you'll see it's coming from IO, you can just mount that one part that Quadrant use in RAM, get crazy high score, but that won't speed up any other apps/system as you still use your NAND/SD card
2) Video speed, as on early Darkstone builds video score was very low as that build had something turned off (because with it's ON there were other bugs), but all apps were using some other API for video, so only Quadrant was slow on it
3) Quadrant tests doesn't show real system performance, so higher score might have no increase in speed in other apps. For example you can put newest CPU on your PC, but having only 256mb RAM would make everything slow, no matter how fast your CPU is, but CPU score would be higher
This doesn't mean that Quadrant is bad, in my opinion if you're using pro version and you get some component score (for example CPU score) higher on one build then on other - that's good. If you get total score higher, build might be actually slower then other build with low score.

this is the old 1.32... at 1200mhz cedes sd build.
with the new 1.72... dhd base i get max 5000 cpu points and approx 5000 I/O points with data on ext4 partition. that makes 2400 overall quadrant points. at 998 mhz. but if i put all data to nand the I/O points are 1250, but the device feels faster and boots faster. for now i only put app folder on the ext4 partition, dalvik and data remain on internal memory. i am still testing whats the best combo, it takes lot of time

johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your right there.
I don't use Quadrant much but i got over 3000 before (using Darkstones SUPERAM)

Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Skellyyy said:
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?

SuperNAND got about 4000.
Proof:
Someone beat this . Quadrant scores are garbage, it proves nothing.

jonny68 said:
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm on my phone right now I can't get the link but its the DHD build by Andrew something. Should be on the first page in the NAND forum.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

SmartBench scores on FroYo EB13

My current smart bench scores are
1067
2374
on 2.2
They were
1100
2700
on 2.1.
Anyone else getting bad scores?
I can't search from my phone, so if there's another thread like this please lead me there.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

bump
10char

Those numbers don't exactly mean much... it's such a small variance that I wouldn't worry about it.

After going the ext4 kernel my scores are a little higher.
I think once we get cleaner roms scores will start to go up.

On stock EB13 I got:
1083
2438
That doesn't really seem that bad to me.

EB13 running Genocide 1.2oc kernel, rfs:
1236/2788

Smart Bench Scores RFS: OC 1.2 Kernel Genocide=
1258/2890

Any downfall to that kernel?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

no downfall i can see SB 1355/3037 ext4 geno kern

Scores on a phone!!!!!!! What's the point? Reminds me of the nerdy kid at school modifying his gaming laptop to brag about scores. A laptop I understand, a phone? Who cares.

I care.
shook187 said:
Scores on a phone!!!!!!! What's the point? Reminds me of the nerdy kid at school modifying his gaming laptop to brag about scores. A laptop I understand, a phone? Who cares.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phones ARE computers these days. Fast computers rock. Why do you make the comparison to a laptop and state that a "phone" is anything less. Phone is just a word to describe the original function of these micro-devices. They are 1% phone and 99% other-than-phone. Broaden your horizon(s).

Tirregius said:
Phones ARE computers these days. Fast computers rock. Why do you make the comparison to a laptop and state that a "phone" is anything less. Phone is just a word to describe the original function of these micro-devices. They are 1% phone and 99% other-than-phone. Broaden your horizon(s).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
These scores do have a meaning to the people who run the tests. I mean, that's like asking, "why do you race your car at the drag strip?" Easy! To see how my car ranks against others. I can see how my mods affects my car(or in this case, smartphone)'s performance. It doesn't matter if it's noticeable to the user.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

BWFBezerk said:
My current smart bench scores are
1067
2374
on 2.2
They were
1100
2700
on 2.1.
Anyone else getting bad scores?
I can't search from my phone, so if there's another thread like this please lead me there.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not surprising when you see the real world performance of 2.1 vs 2.2 on the Epic. 2.1 was smoother, faster and all around more stable. Don't believe me? One simple test, pull down the notification bar on 2.1 and 2.2. When compared, you see that on 2.2 it is super choppy in comparison to the perfect smoothness of 2.1. I hate to say this...

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Eazail70x7 said:
Not surprising when you see the real world performance of 2.1 vs 2.2 on the Epic. 2.1 was smoother, faster and all around more stable. Don't believe me? One simple test, pull down the notification bar on 2.1 and 2.2. When compared, you see that on 2.2 it is super choppy in comparison to the perfect smoothness of 2.1. I hate to say this...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Either your on crack or something is messed up with your phone. I went back to eclair for a minute before I went to eb13 there is no difference in the pulldown. Maybe you have 15 apps running...........
Epic 4g

1396/3100
Genocide OC kernel @ 1200MHz running Midnight ROM 4.0
To the above poster, how did you get EB13 to 1300MHz?

hehehe Dorks!! My E-penis is bigger then your E-penis... hehehehahahahaa
I don't put much stock in benchmarks, and have yet to waste my time running them. I worry about how my phone performs when I am using it. Working pretty good I might Add, Nebula 1.07 with Genocide kernel.. Can't compare my E-Penis because as I said, I haven't measured it.

socos25 said:
hehehe Dorks!! My E-penis is bigger then your E-penis... hehehehahahahaa
I don't put much stock in benchmarks, and have yet to waste my time running them. I worry about how my phone performs when I am using it. Working pretty good I might Add, Nebula 1.07 with Genocide kernel.. Can't compare my E-Penis because as I said, I haven't measured it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seriously are you going through each forum and posting some bs like this. quit trolling

Smartbench 2010: 1337/3041 EB13 - Genocide v0.1a 1.2GHZ OC
Stock EB13 (was) 1035/2285
To the troll on this thread:
The reason we have great software and great devices that are fast and reliable is because of people like those that are here pushing it to the limit. Make no mistake - if you like tech you should just let the geeks do there thing and you just enjoy the fruits of their work.