Database Users

Quadrant Scores

I just wanted to add a place where people could post and brag about their blazing fast phones! Mine was 2304!! I'm currently running a Samsung Vibrant/rooted/one click lag fix. I also have an HTC HD2 running Hyperdroid v1.6 build (flawlessly)

Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.

Use search. There was a topic about this a couple a days ago.
Score:2259
Sent from my Samsung Vibrant using the xda-developers app.

sj_martin said:
Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THIS. Indeed.

Yea they aren't precise. Its just a way to show off for no reason. Its like wearing a lot of fake gold to show you have money.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Can someone explain why Quadrant is bs? I saw a thread talking about it really doesn't "work" the phone. If that's the cade I can understand that. But isn't it a way to compare android phones? An equal set of standards and each phone
is ranked how it meets these standards. Or Is it all made up?

sj_martin said:
Quadrant scores are retarded. They mean nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^^^^^this
actually OP change it and make a rule ....no LAG fix

Thanks for the answer.

2650 but don't know what it means so it doesn't matter to me much
Willsnews

Quadrant scores are a reference
Quadrant scores are just a benchmarking tools and should only be used as a reference, just like a Photo snapshot. It is not an end all too prove you have a fast or fastest setup, but IT does provide a general view of how your phone is performing.
Remember....... the slowest thing in the hardware or software is what will govern performance. an example of this would be in a desktop computer.... you get a super fast I-7 chip or maybe a SUN chip with 64 cpus. Great !! but you have this 8 yr old hard drive and Win 98.........that chip is useless . This is why some of the developers strive to build a efficient bug free rom that performs the same in or with all things loaded into the phone. And the developers here do a super job of building a variety of excellent performing roms.

Agreed they really do !!!
Willsnews

ntellegence said:
Can someone explain why Quadrant is bs? I saw a thread talking about it really doesn't "work" the phone. If that's the cade I can understand that. But isn't it a way to compare android phones? An equal set of standards and each phone
is ranked how it meets these standards. Or Is it all made up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://briefmobile.com/cyanogen-demonstrates-quadrants-flaws

Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Dammit2Hell said:
Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get 1,200.. But I have no clue what they are doing, nor do I care

Dammit2Hell said:
Regardless of wether the scores are crap or not...how are you guys getting numbers in the 2000's? The highest I get is 885.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read the post above yours, it'll tell you.

By rooting and installing the lag fix alone gets you 2100+
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

my score with " Super speedy ye-pa ye-pa speedy Gonzales lagFix
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Stock Quadrant Score with 2.2?

Hello ladies and gents of the Vibrant forum. I'm a G2 user thinking about returning his G2 tomorrow for a Vibrant. What is the Vibrant stock Quadrant score with the OTA 2.2 update? Already tried search.

The OTA was not 2.2, it was an update to 2.1.

rembonjaski said:
The OTA was not 2.2, it was an update to 2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh.
Nevermind then.

Hmmm
There's no 2.2 update yet... sorry

Are you guys serious?! Eugene released a stable 2.2 ROM this morning!
With just a stock 2.2 flash youre looking @ 980 on quad & 14.xx @ 5.9 sec on linpack.
As always though... Benchmarks dont mean jack! From personal experience this phone is awesome! If I stopped flashing it so damn much I'd be able to get 20+ hours on the battery too!

I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

disturkis4u said:
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think what the OP wanted was a 2.2 vibrant score w/ JIT enabled... eugenes ROM has it.
Stable means usable & will not die or cause nuclear war. Perfect ROM? No... Only working 2.2 ROM working (minus GPS & a few other things not working) on the vibrant, yes.
exactly what does stability & usability have to with a mathematical bench mark test? are you referring to hacks & mods vs. hard code? Stability wise? # wise??

I just got 1903 after using the z4mod (ext2) on JI6:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quite happy with that - but more happy with a somewhat useable phone!
-bZj

All~G1 said:
Are you guys serious?! Eugene released a stable 2.2 ROM this morning!
With just a stock 2.2 flash youre looking @ 980 on quad & 14.xx @ 5.9 sec on linpack.
As always though... Benchmarks dont mean jack! From personal experience this phone is awesome! If I stopped flashing it so damn much I'd be able to get 20+ hours on the battery too!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, I don't like when people put benchmarks down. I happen to believe that some of the benchmarks, including Quadrant Professional are accurate and reflective of real performance. Then again everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

disturkis4u said:
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just flashed bionix final team whiskey ,oc n everything its really really fast but I just ran a 790! Why did our run so slow? I barely have any apps on here in the first place...?

i get 900-910 with JI6 everything stock.
edit
sorry OP wants Score with 2.2

down8 said:
I just got 1903 after using the z4mod (ext2) on JI6:
Quite happy with that - but more happy with a somewhat useable phone!
-bZj
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly what i was about to say. who cares about 2.2 when you can flash a bionix rom and hit up to 2600 on quadrant. not that quadrant really means anything more than a benchmark.

I think OP is looking for a official froyo 2.2 rom...Sorry OP, no official froyo, but there is a ported version eugene has done.
Click here
Although this is a "froyo", no one is sure if this can be an accurate representation of how our vibrants will run when we get the official OTA, but if you want "froyo" now, by all means go ahead and flash it. Its still missing a few kinks and has bugs.

Anyone else getting very low quadrant scores??

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is about as high a score as I get. I'm running the new EB01 ROM with CPU set to performance and 1ghz. Anyone else getting these scores?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App

Im only getting 1550ish with the new EB01 voodoo kernel. =/ That score you have is about what I get without voodoo on 2.2.

yeah im getting around 1500 with voodoo 2.2. I used to get over 2000 with 2.1 voodoo. Not sure what this is all about.

Quadrant standard is overrated unless you just like those pretty numbers.

ataranine said:
This is about as high a score as I get. I'm running the new EB01 ROM with CPU set to performance and 1ghz. Anyone else getting these scores?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering a actual voodoo kernel (not leak) has yet to be released, that is expected. 1Ghz is just the normal max speed for the fascinate, so nothing surprising there.

I got 966 on my first try
From my super clean dl30 fascinate

Not sure what they mean but thats what I got
From my super clean dl30 fascinate

I scores are 1051, 1089, 1092, 1042
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App

Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App

Kevin Gossett said:
Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
The phone runs fells like it's running faster and smoother to me than it did on 2.1 with a custom kernel. Quadrant score is lower though, so does that mean my phone is slower? No. Quadrant is just a test, its results mean absolutely nothing in terms of actual performance. If it did, that'd mean that Snapdragons are the superior CPU/GPU combo, when we all know that the Hummingbird is the most advanced chip in a phone outside of the Tegra 2.

Kevin Gossett said:
Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bragging rights..what else.

I dont care what they mean. I was just showing what I got.
From my super clean dl30 fascinate

Im getting about 1600 on eb01 on voodoo kernel without i get in the 900s but it may be because the voodoo kernel by jt is still in testing stage and he may not have it just right yet but knowing how good he is i am sure he will have it perfect soon.

I scored just over 1000 on EB01 non-voodoo but it really doesn't mean squat! I dunno why it doesn't score higher cause it fly's the way it is now... I mess with a friends Dinc all the time and I can see a huge difference in "Real World" use!

It means nothing.

Daswolven said:
It means nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha... Too funny

Benchmarking is good for 2 things, and ONLY 2 things:
1. Comparing a device to itself with different configurations to determine performance increases (like JIT vs non-JIT, voodoo vs non-voodo, etc).
2. Comparing one device to another with the same software configuration to determine build quality, find a hardware fault, etc (i.e. 2 identical SGS phones with identical software configuration, but one scores 1,500, and the other scores 600).
Other than that, benchmarks are nothing but pissing contests where one or both participants could be aiming into the wind at any given time (no matter the situation, someone ends up all wet).

Think I found an answer for you.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=11443973#post11443973
same problem on my evo.... summary = newest version of quadrant is to blame.

I was getting damn near 1600 on Jt's aosp 2.2 w/o voodoo but meh

yeah i get like 943. The quandrant scores don't lie: 2.2 has slowed our phones down immensely.

Quadrant Advanced scores!!!!

samsung galaxy s quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz custom rom ext 4 fps uncapped
Total 2014
Cpu. 1691
Mem 1780
I/o. 5359
2d. 359
3d. 1027
samsung galaxy s2 quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz stock rom
Total 3381
Cpu. 7046
Mem 3823
I/o. 3929
2d. 888
3d. 1199
Im getting it! Lol

7000 for CPU?!

screenshot or link would be nice

demo23019 said:
screenshot or link would be nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html

Yeah that's the link. Wait until the devs get a hold of this phone and tweak the I/o speed, uncap the gpu and of the cpu. Imagine the score then. Sanding as redeem themselves from the behold 2 and the gps issues of the original sgs. IT ALSO SCORED A 47 MFLOPS IN LINPACK IN 1.55s. BEASTING.

MikeyMike01 said:
7000 for CPU?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.

KingKuba13 said:
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try comparing GLBenchmark scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

golf2vr6 said:
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rotating planets missing textures , there is not suppose to be pale planets and white background. Also reports of several high profile games not working...
I really wish Samsung used Nvidia tegra or PowerVR SGX , those two companys were in GPU business long time they can write proper GPU drivers , mali is peace of crap.

Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.

Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

rovex said:
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its actually issue with Quadrant. Quadrant advanced and professional editions are stuck at version 1.1.6 which is known to have issues with phones running Gingerbread ROMs like SGS2.
So those scores are flawed.
Standard edition has been upgraded to version 1.1.7 which works without these issues with gingerbread. Ironically those who paid are left in ditch at the moment with lack of update

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
lol quadrant

Makes sense. Its probably why Advanced gives me consistently 5 to 10% lower scores. The textures do seem unstable, sometimes they work, sometimes not.

MaBlo said:
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.

KingKuba13 said:
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wonder if samsung is going to cap the frame rate on the tegra 2 version of the phone?

120% performance increase with Linaro toolchain

I heard the Linaro changes are being pushed, I checked and it looks like it may take a little more time.
basically the Linaro builds use a toolchain that give android builds up to a 30%* performance increase
If any devs want to take a look at it, It's in gerrit (I think this is it)
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/17380/
EDIT: Galaxy Nexus version's reported benchmarks

I read it was only a 30# improvement. I hope it improves the lag on the recents list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

mikeymop said:
I read it was only a 30# improvement. I hope it improves the lag on the recents list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I calculated based on panda-board FPS average results, but you're probably right
EDIT: yep, it was 30, I'm bad at math

Ezekeel believed this was not true, check this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044

bedalus said:
Ezekeel believed this was not true, check this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A Galaxy Nexus ROM has this and they say the UI overall is faster.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/com...ld_optimizations_that_can_make_ics_30/c4y97ef
Could be placebo, who knows.

Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!

bedalus said:
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If this is real, I have a feeling it doesn't respond to benchmarks. As most know, benchmarks are not real world tests.
e.g. deleting an OpenGLes lib to make benchmarks show a different score.

bedalus said:
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already see one person that won't hesitate to benchmark this as soon as it will be available on Nexus S

Wow if this implemented on our phones we will not be needing another core
Sent from my Nexus S®

Oh wait, found this:
http://www.cnx-software.com/2012/06...k-android-to-shame-on-ti-pandaboard-omap4430/
...with the same video.
Looks promising!

Slim ics rom and kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Omg my score is higher than linaro optimized android on gnex!i wonder how much improvement we'll get if slim rom also optimized by linaro..
Sent from my Crespo using xda premium

What program is that your using ? Would love this to come to cm9 based nexus s roms
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

tchaari said:
I already see one person that won't hesitate to benchmark this as soon as it will be available on Nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right! Bedalus will have this sorted soon enough! I'm sure it will be added to the sticky soon after
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

according to Gerrit, CM is having some troubles with compatibility, and they are sorting that out right now.

italia0101 said:
What program is that your using ? Would love this to come to cm9 based nexus s roms
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
koax88 is using 0xbench

koax88 said:
Slim ics rom and kernel
View attachment 1119576
Omg my score is higher than linaro optimized android on gnex!i wonder how much improvement we'll get if slim rom also optimized by linaro..
Sent from my Crespo using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to compare it to a GNEX, not using Nexus S. GNEX has to push more pixels and so on to the 4.65" 720p screen comparing to Nexus S with 4.0" display. I believe that would put a strain on the CPU?

I have question. In which part of an android will this be implemented? The rom or the kernel?
Sent from my Nexus S®

The rom, good sir

mixtapes08 said:
I have question. In which part of an android will this be implemented? The rom or the kernel?
Sent from my Nexus S®
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question. We've already seen that there's no significant benefit from linaro 'optimized' kernel builds. Should be interesting.
....memoirs of a flash addict.

CM9 nightly implemented some Linaro code in the build you can see in change log I did 2 quadrant scores at 1.4ghz & got total score of 1800 I then flashed the Anidroid hardened kernel b.13 which was build using linaro tool chain & got a score of 2500 phone did seem a little quicker but nothing crazy
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium