Hello ladies and gents of the Vibrant forum. I'm a G2 user thinking about returning his G2 tomorrow for a Vibrant. What is the Vibrant stock Quadrant score with the OTA 2.2 update? Already tried search.
The OTA was not 2.2, it was an update to 2.1.
rembonjaski said:
The OTA was not 2.2, it was an update to 2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh.
Nevermind then.
Hmmm
There's no 2.2 update yet... sorry
Are you guys serious?! Eugene released a stable 2.2 ROM this morning!
With just a stock 2.2 flash youre looking @ 980 on quad & 14.xx @ 5.9 sec on linpack.
As always though... Benchmarks dont mean jack! From personal experience this phone is awesome! If I stopped flashing it so damn much I'd be able to get 20+ hours on the battery too!
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
disturkis4u said:
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think what the OP wanted was a 2.2 vibrant score w/ JIT enabled... eugenes ROM has it.
Stable means usable & will not die or cause nuclear war. Perfect ROM? No... Only working 2.2 ROM working (minus GPS & a few other things not working) on the vibrant, yes.
exactly what does stability & usability have to with a mathematical bench mark test? are you referring to hacks & mods vs. hard code? Stability wise? # wise??
I just got 1903 after using the z4mod (ext2) on JI6:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quite happy with that - but more happy with a somewhat useable phone!
-bZj
All~G1 said:
Are you guys serious?! Eugene released a stable 2.2 ROM this morning!
With just a stock 2.2 flash youre looking @ 980 on quad & 14.xx @ 5.9 sec on linpack.
As always though... Benchmarks dont mean jack! From personal experience this phone is awesome! If I stopped flashing it so damn much I'd be able to get 20+ hours on the battery too!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, I don't like when people put benchmarks down. I happen to believe that some of the benchmarks, including Quadrant Professional are accurate and reflective of real performance. Then again everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
disturkis4u said:
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just flashed bionix final team whiskey ,oc n everything its really really fast but I just ran a 790! Why did our run so slow? I barely have any apps on here in the first place...?
i get 900-910 with JI6 everything stock.
edit
sorry OP wants Score with 2.2
down8 said:
I just got 1903 after using the z4mod (ext2) on JI6:
Quite happy with that - but more happy with a somewhat useable phone!
-bZj
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly what i was about to say. who cares about 2.2 when you can flash a bionix rom and hit up to 2600 on quadrant. not that quadrant really means anything more than a benchmark.
I think OP is looking for a official froyo 2.2 rom...Sorry OP, no official froyo, but there is a ported version eugene has done.
Click here
Although this is a "froyo", no one is sure if this can be an accurate representation of how our vibrants will run when we get the official OTA, but if you want "froyo" now, by all means go ahead and flash it. Its still missing a few kinks and has bugs.
Related
I just got this on virtuous 3.1.0 with kings kernel BFS #5. This is the highest I've seen so I thought I should share.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
SR 3.3.2 KK #5
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
lol.
I was proud... Im now gonna try to get mine higher lol
Have y'all seen what the G2's doing overclocked? It's sick.
whats with the ads on screen shots??? your on rooted phones...ADFREE(market app)
jager420 said:
whats with the ads on screen shots??? your on rooted phones...ADFREE(market app)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually leave mine on most of the time to support the devs who hand out free apps.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Im not even getting 1200 on Redemptive 1.8. Is it purely the rom and kernel that are giving those scores? Im sure to kill any running apps via running services in the settings menu.
PonsAsinorem said:
I actually leave mine on most of the time to support the devs who hand out free apps.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha. I do that too. Even with flash and some websites.
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
RyanTX said:
Im not even getting 1200 on Redemptive 1.8. Is it purely the rom and kernel that are giving those scores? Im sure to kill any running apps via running services in the settings menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never kill apps. Which kernel are you using and what are your setcpu settings.
silverramsrt said:
I never kill apps. Which kernel are you using and what are your setcpu settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that's probably it... I have had the phone since release but have been afraid to do anything until a couple weeks ago.
I just installed my first rom - Redemptive Revolution 1.8 (love it BTW) but it came with the newest HTC kernel, so that's what I am using. I dont even have SetCPU on my phone. You think the sub 1200 is about right for not having it?
RyanTX said:
Well that's probably it... I have had the phone since release but have been afraid to do anything until a couple weeks ago.
I just installed my first rom - Redemptive Revolution 1.8 (love it BTW) but it came with the newest HTC kernel, so that's what I am using. I dont even have SetCPU on my phone. You think the sub 1200 is about right for not having it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, since you're new to this don't get caught up on numbers. Take a look at what Lou's got to say (and fwiw, I completely agree).
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8734924&postcount=1875
What app are you guys using to benchmark?
my highest benchmark has been 1710 using skyraider vanilla 3.0 and kings kernal #5/#5
Wish i had a screenshot
setexascustoms said:
Have y'all seen what the G2's doing overclocked? It's sick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is pretty sick but. I wish it was possible to clock the Inc to 1.5 gHz and be stable. Also some overclocks lately have been fake but its awesome that this one is real XD.
makos101 said:
What app are you guys using to benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The app is called "Quadrant" and you can find it in the android market. XD Theirs also "Linpack" that you can use to test out Mega Flops.
got these scores had to redo test becuase drocap didnt capture screen like i wanted as you can see.. had to use shootme for second test and score droped a little. Im on ROM The new guy v5 with the blue theme v2. with king kernal bfs #5..love the ROM
**edit
BTW i was reading above about app killing(which i usally do) and both these test were done w/o killing apps and such went straight to testing..
Uber Rom Rules!
On Uber Desire Z, I got 1745 on my incredible!!!!!!!!!!!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=861285
I got 3985 on my HTC HD2 which isn't even a native android device. lol
This is 100% legit & I currently hold the highest score I've ever seen. The system im running is in my sig & has no set cpu or overclocking enabled. It has parts of the operating system stored in the RAM which has much faster I/O than NAND.
quadrant honestly doesn't mean much
just wanted to share my results with i9000 2.3 ROM on My Vibrant
here is what i got ....Note the CPU score !!
also note high I/O because i have voodoo lagfix
so should avr same as NS around 1700 stock
Nice CPU score
3D is low because quadrant has issues rendering 3D correctly with 2.3
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is very happy news. What is linpack saying?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Sorry I meant to post in general...please move
Gomjabar said:
This is very happy news. What is linpack saying?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as NS 14-15
Is the i9000 2.3 made from the nexus s or is it from an official release for i9000?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
jmatic said:
Is the i9000 2.3 made from the nexus s or is it from an official release for i9000?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
made from aosp 2.3 source code & possibly bits from nexus s dump
But how does the Scorpion score on 2.3?
This is excellent news, means the Dalvik Jit compiler is finally optimized to give the Hummingbird a performance boost.
But, what if this excitment is pre-mature? I want to see the nexus ONE(scorpion phone) running 2.3, what if 2.3 on a scorpion boosts their performance even more than it already did on 2.2!
Lets compare 2.3 vibrant to 2.3 scorpion, then we will know!
SamsungVibrant said:
This is excellent news, means the Dalvik Jit compiler is finally optimized to give the Hummingbird a performance boost.
But, what if this excitment is pre-mature? I want to see the nexus ONE(scorpion phone) running 2.3, what if 2.3 on a scorpion boosts their performance even more than it already did on 2.2!
Lets compare 2.3 vibrant to 2.3 scorpion, then we will know!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Scorpion is not on the nexus one
Also Quadrant doesn't test MFLOPS... linpack does
The purpose of my post to show the galaxy S phones take advantage of JIT just like the NS..even though we pretty much knew this
The scorpion CPU is nothing more than a snapdragon with updated adreno GPU will pretty much have same linpack score as N1 snapdragon
this is great, but now i want the official gingerbread, when will samsung end the misery of consumers?!?!?
Awesome, thanks for the pic.
LOL @ no signal, are you sure your not on a iphone?
xriderx66 said:
LOL @ no signal, are you sure your not on a iphone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It needs a sim card to get a signal
demo23019 said:
It needs a sim card to get a signal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh.. ha jokes on me.
Upload CWM or ODIN version of this rom so we can do this too ?
I am assuming that this rom has taken supercurio's development further along
demo23019 said:
Scorpion is not on the nexus one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, I meant snapdragon.
ozmulti said:
Upload CWM or ODIN version of this rom so we can do this too ?
I am assuming that this rom has taken supercurio's development further along
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this is supercurio's rom. He's simply showing the performance results of it. There is no fully functional Gingerbread rom for SGS phones yet. However, if supercurio continues at this pace, it may not be much longer
Thanks a lot for sharing this... although, you've just made the wait that much harder.
Wow if its true.I had similar cpu reading in quadrant while testing cm6 beta3 also.i even posted it here in excitement but later came to know that it excluded h264 test to get the inflated results...hope its not the same with gb port.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Ok noob question......how do I figure out my score....
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Is It the Demo or something?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is about as high a score as I get. I'm running the new EB01 ROM with CPU set to performance and 1ghz. Anyone else getting these scores?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Im only getting 1550ish with the new EB01 voodoo kernel. =/ That score you have is about what I get without voodoo on 2.2.
yeah im getting around 1500 with voodoo 2.2. I used to get over 2000 with 2.1 voodoo. Not sure what this is all about.
Quadrant standard is overrated unless you just like those pretty numbers.
ataranine said:
This is about as high a score as I get. I'm running the new EB01 ROM with CPU set to performance and 1ghz. Anyone else getting these scores?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering a actual voodoo kernel (not leak) has yet to be released, that is expected. 1Ghz is just the normal max speed for the fascinate, so nothing surprising there.
I got 966 on my first try
From my super clean dl30 fascinate
Not sure what they mean but thats what I got
From my super clean dl30 fascinate
I scores are 1051, 1089, 1092, 1042
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Kevin Gossett said:
Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
The phone runs fells like it's running faster and smoother to me than it did on 2.1 with a custom kernel. Quadrant score is lower though, so does that mean my phone is slower? No. Quadrant is just a test, its results mean absolutely nothing in terms of actual performance. If it did, that'd mean that Snapdragons are the superior CPU/GPU combo, when we all know that the Hummingbird is the most advanced chip in a phone outside of the Tegra 2.
Kevin Gossett said:
Why is everyone so concerned with quadrant scores? They really don't mean anything.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bragging rights..what else.
I dont care what they mean. I was just showing what I got.
From my super clean dl30 fascinate
Im getting about 1600 on eb01 on voodoo kernel without i get in the 900s but it may be because the voodoo kernel by jt is still in testing stage and he may not have it just right yet but knowing how good he is i am sure he will have it perfect soon.
I scored just over 1000 on EB01 non-voodoo but it really doesn't mean squat! I dunno why it doesn't score higher cause it fly's the way it is now... I mess with a friends Dinc all the time and I can see a huge difference in "Real World" use!
It means nothing.
Daswolven said:
It means nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha... Too funny
Benchmarking is good for 2 things, and ONLY 2 things:
1. Comparing a device to itself with different configurations to determine performance increases (like JIT vs non-JIT, voodoo vs non-voodo, etc).
2. Comparing one device to another with the same software configuration to determine build quality, find a hardware fault, etc (i.e. 2 identical SGS phones with identical software configuration, but one scores 1,500, and the other scores 600).
Other than that, benchmarks are nothing but pissing contests where one or both participants could be aiming into the wind at any given time (no matter the situation, someone ends up all wet).
Think I found an answer for you.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=11443973#post11443973
same problem on my evo.... summary = newest version of quadrant is to blame.
I was getting damn near 1600 on Jt's aosp 2.2 w/o voodoo but meh
yeah i get like 943. The quandrant scores don't lie: 2.2 has slowed our phones down immensely.
My current smart bench scores are
1067
2374
on 2.2
They were
1100
2700
on 2.1.
Anyone else getting bad scores?
I can't search from my phone, so if there's another thread like this please lead me there.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
bump
10char
Those numbers don't exactly mean much... it's such a small variance that I wouldn't worry about it.
After going the ext4 kernel my scores are a little higher.
I think once we get cleaner roms scores will start to go up.
On stock EB13 I got:
1083
2438
That doesn't really seem that bad to me.
EB13 running Genocide 1.2oc kernel, rfs:
1236/2788
Smart Bench Scores RFS: OC 1.2 Kernel Genocide=
1258/2890
Any downfall to that kernel?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
no downfall i can see SB 1355/3037 ext4 geno kern
Scores on a phone!!!!!!! What's the point? Reminds me of the nerdy kid at school modifying his gaming laptop to brag about scores. A laptop I understand, a phone? Who cares.
I care.
shook187 said:
Scores on a phone!!!!!!! What's the point? Reminds me of the nerdy kid at school modifying his gaming laptop to brag about scores. A laptop I understand, a phone? Who cares.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phones ARE computers these days. Fast computers rock. Why do you make the comparison to a laptop and state that a "phone" is anything less. Phone is just a word to describe the original function of these micro-devices. They are 1% phone and 99% other-than-phone. Broaden your horizon(s).
Tirregius said:
Phones ARE computers these days. Fast computers rock. Why do you make the comparison to a laptop and state that a "phone" is anything less. Phone is just a word to describe the original function of these micro-devices. They are 1% phone and 99% other-than-phone. Broaden your horizon(s).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
These scores do have a meaning to the people who run the tests. I mean, that's like asking, "why do you race your car at the drag strip?" Easy! To see how my car ranks against others. I can see how my mods affects my car(or in this case, smartphone)'s performance. It doesn't matter if it's noticeable to the user.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
BWFBezerk said:
My current smart bench scores are
1067
2374
on 2.2
They were
1100
2700
on 2.1.
Anyone else getting bad scores?
I can't search from my phone, so if there's another thread like this please lead me there.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not surprising when you see the real world performance of 2.1 vs 2.2 on the Epic. 2.1 was smoother, faster and all around more stable. Don't believe me? One simple test, pull down the notification bar on 2.1 and 2.2. When compared, you see that on 2.2 it is super choppy in comparison to the perfect smoothness of 2.1. I hate to say this...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Eazail70x7 said:
Not surprising when you see the real world performance of 2.1 vs 2.2 on the Epic. 2.1 was smoother, faster and all around more stable. Don't believe me? One simple test, pull down the notification bar on 2.1 and 2.2. When compared, you see that on 2.2 it is super choppy in comparison to the perfect smoothness of 2.1. I hate to say this...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Either your on crack or something is messed up with your phone. I went back to eclair for a minute before I went to eb13 there is no difference in the pulldown. Maybe you have 15 apps running...........
Epic 4g
1396/3100
Genocide OC kernel @ 1200MHz running Midnight ROM 4.0
To the above poster, how did you get EB13 to 1300MHz?
hehehe Dorks!! My E-penis is bigger then your E-penis... hehehehahahahaa
I don't put much stock in benchmarks, and have yet to waste my time running them. I worry about how my phone performs when I am using it. Working pretty good I might Add, Nebula 1.07 with Genocide kernel.. Can't compare my E-Penis because as I said, I haven't measured it.
socos25 said:
hehehe Dorks!! My E-penis is bigger then your E-penis... hehehehahahahaa
I don't put much stock in benchmarks, and have yet to waste my time running them. I worry about how my phone performs when I am using it. Working pretty good I might Add, Nebula 1.07 with Genocide kernel.. Can't compare my E-Penis because as I said, I haven't measured it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seriously are you going through each forum and posting some bs like this. quit trolling
Smartbench 2010: 1337/3041 EB13 - Genocide v0.1a 1.2GHZ OC
Stock EB13 (was) 1035/2285
To the troll on this thread:
The reason we have great software and great devices that are fast and reliable is because of people like those that are here pushing it to the limit. Make no mistake - if you like tech you should just let the geeks do there thing and you just enjoy the fruits of their work.
Getting amazing improvement after applying the update. Yes, I repeated this twice to be sure: "No overclock"
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Very impressive. A lot of people have been mentioning snappiness from the update and this backs that up.
I wanna see what this update looks like with OC kernels.
my quadrant and best linpack
Kernal: coolbho3000 v2 1.5GHz
Governer: Interactive
Quadrant: 3072
Linpack: 64.191MFlops
arrtoodeetoo said:
I wanna see what this update looks like with OC kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the 3.0.1 update, have you or anyone else tried the OC (1.5) kernel that everyone's been missing with. I thought I had read over in that thread that there were issues with it now (FC's?). Not sure if I should even bother with flashing it at this point.
lasphyxial said:
my quadrant and best linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is this with the 1.5 ghz OC kernel?
I,m using the oc kernel with 3.0.1, no FCs at all.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
whitedragon33 said:
I,m using the oc kernel with 3.0.1, no FCs at all.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And there was no issue installing it using the exact same files/instructions from before the 3.0.1 update?
I used the apk that jrummy made to install the update for rooted users and it worked like a charm and I still have my overclocked kernel. I didn't have to reinstall the overclocked kernel after the update.
from my Xoom using XDA App
Well I'm not sure what is going on with this kernel. After updating to 3.0.1, then unlocking, then rooting, I went through the procedure for flashing this kernel just as I had done last week. I was able to successfully send the xoom_ocboot.img, then rebooted in fastboot, then remounted, then pushed the bcm4329.ko kernel (verified afterwards by looking with Root Explorer), then rebooted in adb, but the kernel didn't take. The kernel from the 3.0.1 update is still in effect.
What gives??!?!
Maybe I should try the tiamat kernel instead? Whats the difference?
EDIT: I ended up wiping everything and starting from scratch, and this time I modded the OC first, THEN I used the update installer app to update to 3.0.1, which worked perfectly.
despich said:
... and I still have my overclocked kernel. I didn't have to reinstall the overclocked kernel after the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHS; and no issues here.
FWIW, SetCPU shows I'm running 216-1504, but my best LinPack is only ~44.
My original quadrant scores were between 1800-1900. I got the update, and they are still in the same area, no jump to 2100+ like in your attached photo. Was kinda sad cuz I noticed some choppiness while playing Dungeon Defenders and probably could have used that boost to fix it up.
...Then, just to be sure, I restarted it. My scores now match yours. I mean, it already restarted when it updated, but whatever. So if anybody else wants the boost, be sure to do another restart. I rarely restart so it would be a shame for anyone to miss out on a performance boost.
MichaelWestin said:
... Then, just to be sure, I restarted it. My scores now match yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sumbitch. After a restart, my (1.5GHz OCed) device now gets 2454. Before that, it was less than yours.
OP, what do you use to make screenshots? Neither "Shoot Me" nor ... (uh, another one I tried) work. I'm rooted BTW.
kcrudup said:
OP, what do you use to make screenshots? Neither "Shoot Me" nor ... (uh, another one I tried) work. I'm rooted BTW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshots were with the Dalvik Debug Monitor in the SDK Tools.
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Who cares about quadrant, should be using Smartbench 2011 anyway.
quadrant is a terrible benchmarking application.
scores are very inconsistent. if you rerun the application you will get a higher score.
btw, going from 3.0 to 3.01 did not give any improvement in terms of snappiness.
eloist said:
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same. Quadrant has always been this way, however - not everyone gets the same scores.
eloist said:
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must add that my experience is the same. My Xoom has been getting around 1820 regardless of update or reboots.
nubsors said:
Who cares about quadrant, should be using Smartbench 2011 anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just DL'd Smartbench 2011 and ran it. I must say I'm very pleased. All of the stock Xooms running 3.0.1 are getting between 2945-2963. Mine scored a 3329 and is running stock ROM & kernel on 3.0.1. Am quite happy now!