Hi guys, I have an arc S from a few weeks, after several tests I found a rom that flies in quadrant, these are the results:
4030 pts without overclocking
4739 pts with overclocking @ 2000 (v15 doom-Kernel)
All the other roms, including Cyanogen v 7.2, have a maximum in 2200-2500 pts.
The rom is SE-tweaked.
How can this difference in performance?
i bet that the guy that made that rom included the quadrant hack, nothin special imo.
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
johnbarleycorn said:
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try antutu benchmark and nenamark 2.
antutu 3500-3600 pts
nenamark2 14.8.
The quandrant booster apk not change the results.
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@1.4 without Supercharger V6.
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got 3924 @ 1.6 GHz smartassV2 on my Arc S.
Nice, what ROM do you use?
Even if Benchmarks say nothing about real use, it's nice to compare
Yesterday I made one test @ 1.8GHz and scored 4285 points
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Look in the signature, same ROM you're using.
I'll try 1,8 GHz too, but 2 GHz not any more, seems like my CPU can't handle it.
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium
Nice, sorry. Tapatalk doesn't display signature so I can't see them.
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
arneh1992 said:
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's totally normal to have that score.
The guy just used the quadrant hack, if you run different benchmarks (e.g. AnTuTu, Vellamo, etc.) you'll notice that your device is nearly the same to other results.
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
arneh1992 said:
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is maximum?
Quadrant scores between 1800 and 2400 are normal imo.
I mean like, cause i use arconium, doomkernel and supercharger i thought it would be faster... But getting scores around the 2000 is the maximum for me, or can i get it higher( without overclocking more )? I wanna play a lot of games with minimum lag
Quadrant scores say nothing!
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Well i dont really know why but my Arc with doomkernel v15 @1.6GHz hit the score of 3982 at Antutu benchmark.. Maybe is the sd booster i use..
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App
My V6 custom ROM - NOT released V6 yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Related
Here, I prove that synthetic benchmarks fail.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My god.... How the heck did you do it?
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
I got 3147 quadrant with miui rc4 and oc to 1300MHz.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
progene81 said:
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so called lag fix for start, and some other tweaks including OC.
But lag fix itself gives a huge boost in quadrant.
I do agree synthetic benchmarks suck especially concerning phones since there are many chips, and many other optimizations for particular CPUs, and they're not equal in either implementation or HW is so much different that comparisons are pointless.
For instance snapdragon might lack with raw power, and our hummingbird is better, but when it comes to SIMD instruction ALUs snapdragon wins + quadrant's optimization for snapdragon et viola...
rschenck said:
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda like this?:
theduckking said:
Kinda like this?:
View attachment 565756
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
rschenck said:
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
theduckking said:
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there an App for that?
I made this score
Using GingerCriskelo V27 and CF-Root 3.0
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
My score:
+ The feeling of a pretty darn fast ROM
Of course the usage was pretty low over the weekend but still^^
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Tk-Glitch said:
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 - Use a RAMdisk for Quadrant storage;
2 - Use old graphics driver from NS;
3 - Overclock.
Overclocking the bus will lead to faster RAM, so faster I/O score from the RAMdisk.
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 1.2GHz. Sorry^^.
At 1GHz, ~4000.
And with 1.4GHz, 4800-4900.
1.5GHz here :
Now 1.4GHz only, but with a faster bus speed, resulting in a boost on I/O and memory scores :
EDIT : Added *lololz* screenshot.
EDIT2 : Replaced *lololz* screenshot by a 1.5GHz one for even more LULZ.
EDIT3 : Added faster bus speed to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
edited
10 chars
coldflid said:
Photoshop...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Tk-Glitch said:
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i didn't mean yours, i totally believe yours, i meant the one on the first post, and now that i look it more closely it doesn't seem fake.
Sorry
I don't know how I got this, I usually only get 4100 and 4200 max but some how I ended up getting 4451! This defiantly competes with the SGS2. Please post any score you have here!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
LOL, and our OC isn't even near as high! 1.1 vs 1.5 ghz!!
SICK! Wow I cant f**king wait!
Chubby_Skunk said:
SICK! Wow I cant f**king wait!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL if we break 1.1... that would be amazing. I wouldn't be surprised to see wayy over 5000!
Do yal not understand how out of date quadrant is? Its results are worthless on any dualcore phone period.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
jug6ernaut said:
Do yal not understand how out of date quadrant is? Its results are worthless on any dualcore phone period.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, yeah I'm pretty sure every one knows that. It's just fun being silly with it
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Why is that ?... post about a quadrant score , which is an app .
Is there any good benchmark for dual core ?
ofek said:
Why is that ?... post about a quadrant score , which is an app .
Is there any good benchmark for dual core ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's called real lief performance.
If everything works with no lag = epic bench mark
If something lags = crappy software
xploited said:
Yeah, it's called real lief performance.
If everything works with no lag = epic bench mark
If something lags = crappy software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol +0+0+0+0+0+1= +1
Use Chain Fire (CF) Bench... much better for dual core
CaelanT said:
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well this is sort of where this kind of benchmark stuff has always been.
CaelanT said:
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is an App
1. How are you doing a quadrant benchmark? Mine errors out at "decoding video". (10/12)
2. I am working on a 1.2 ghz overclock kernel. So far a lot of bugs, maybe that's why quadrant failed... if I succeed, I will try 1.4... if I can even out the major bugs I will release it.
Also, just want to add that on said kernel I got a 6752 overall in Chainfire...
Kthxbai
Sent from my friend's Atrix
trvstw said:
1. How are you doing a quadrant benchmark? Mine errors out at "decoding video". (10/12)
2. I am working on a 1.2 ghz overclock kernel. So far a lot of bugs, maybe that's why quadrant failed... if I succeed, I will try 1.4... if I can even out the major bugs I will release it.
Also, just want to add that on said kernel I got a 6752 overall in Chainfire...
Kthxbai
Sent from my friend's Atrix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're likely getting an error at "decoding video" because you have used your camera. In order to get quadrant to work properly, you have to run a benchmark before you've opened the camera and caused it to force close.
thegregulator said:
You're likely getting an error at "decoding video" because you have used your camera. In order to get quadrant to work properly, you have to run a benchmark before you've opened the camera and caused it to force close.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
Sent from my friend's Atrix
Smartbench 2011
Awesome Benchmark...
does graphics tests
whats the point hight quadrant or any benchmark if the phone stills laggy and can't play 720p lose the fingerprint captabilities and webtop?!
if you want hight quadrant without webtop and fingerprint buy another phone xD lol
just saying.....please don't interpret me wrong
or, if you want all those features, don't install a pre-beta version of a ROM?
highest quadrant score i've gotten so far is 3400-3500, what are you guys doing with your settings to get so high?
Alcapone263 said:
or, if you want all those features, don't install a pre-beta version of a ROM?
highest quadrant score i've gotten so far is 3400-3500, what are you guys doing with your settings to get so high?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure how many times you've tried the test, but I did it about five times in a row and each time my score raised by about 150 until it steadied at 4200 or so. Make sure to free as much RAM and extra processor usage as possible using a task manager or similar. Also, are you at 1.1Ghz? That's what I'm at with the kernel that came with the CM7 pre-beta install. I believe it is faux's kernel.
vinay427 said:
I'm not sure how many times you've tried the test, but I did it about five times in a row and each time my score raised by about 150 until it steadied at 4200 or so. Make sure to free as much RAM and extra processor usage as possible using a task manager or similar. Also, are you at 1.1Ghz? That's what I'm at with the kernel that came with the CM7 pre-beta install. I believe it is faux's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, and unmount your storage (just plug it into the computer, mass storage)
Just wondering what other peoples epic can pull off in quadrant so I guess post a screenshot below and tell us what your running.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
me personally am running Legendary ROM 3.3 w/ IAP Rebirth kernel.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
dunno how to capture screen.. mine is 2516.
im on acs ics v4 ei22
no O/C
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Screenshot it worked for me and for overclock you use voltage control if you'd like to.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Score: 2665
SyndicateROM Frozen 1.2
Genocide Kernel 2.0
OC 1400 Mhz
I an quite happy with my score.
1.4 GHz.
My daily driver OC is 1.2 and that gets me a 3292.
ACS ICS EI22 V2.
Send from my SPH-D700 (Samsung Epic 4G)
Quadrant is pointless for measuring real world performance.. but here is my highest:
1.6ghz on ACS Bamboozle (EF02)
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
tbob18 said:
Quadrant is pointless for measuring real world performance.. but here is my highest:
1.6ghz on ACS Bamboozle (EF02)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Biggoron said:
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha, yeah. It can be fun, reminds me of my 3Dmark days.
Nothing special, the score is from a few months ago.. I froze most of the services and closed everything (about 130mb ram used in task manager)
I was using Tegrak to OC. Settings were 1600mhz, 1400mv core, and 1125mv internal.
Beware, running your phone at these kind of voltages is dangerous and could kill your phone. At 1.6ghz it was not completely stable and would freeze after about 10-15min.
Yeah I can imagine mine barerly handles 1.4 and likes to freeze just running this app every 30 mins or so. Any scripts or anything if not man could only imagine if you ran the v6 script mine runs at around 120mb of ram in task manager 70 in the running services.
tbob18 said:
Ha, yeah. It can be fun, reminds me of my 3Dmark days.
Nothing special, the score is from a few months ago.. I froze most of the services and closed everything (about 130mb ram used in task manager)
I was using Tegrak to OC. Settings were 1600mhz, 1400mv core, and 1125mv internal.
Beware, running your phone at these kind of voltages is dangerous and could kill your phone. At 1.6ghz it was not completely stable and would freeze after about 10-15min.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Nice scores with the overclocks, too bad they are boosted with quadrant scripts.
Get pro and see how inflated I/O performance is.
I wish devs would stop cheating.
Biggoron said:
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also its good for comparing e-pen1s' =D
From what other sections on XDA have told me, they've said quadrant scores mean nothing. I do believe the benchmark isn't quite accurate.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
MikeEx said:
Nice scores with the overclocks, too bad they are boosted with quadrant scripts.
Get pro and see how inflated I/O performance is.
I wish devs would stop cheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, that's how it goes. Smartbench seems to be more accurate, but it is still a synthetic benchmark.
Biggoron said:
Screenshot it worked for me and for overclock you use voltage control if you'd like to.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I tried O/C it now. I'll post the screenshot later when i get back home.
I got 3603 with a fresh install of StarskyROM 1.4, only tegrak (1.3 Ghz) and quadrant installed. It promptly froze up 2 minutes later. I generally get ~2500 with no O/C on that ROM.
A noobs score. Don't be too harsh!
My quadrant score using legendary rom beta 3.3 on the nubernal+ kernal (EI22) with ICS theme running Go Launcher Ex.
My score is far lower than everyone elses but give me time. I'm still a noob (god that puts a bad taste in my mouth) lol!
Hard to see I know. My screenshot app was working great until yesterday... just over 4000... 4083 I believe
Era legendary rom 4.0.1 overclocked to 1.44 ghz using samurai 1.4 kernel...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
My phone will only support 1.252 or below, but my highest was in the 3800's, with Legendary and IAP
New highest 4504 at 1.5 Ghz
Sent from my OG Epic
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?
Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.
Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)
Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?
Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)
vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?
Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.
Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!
@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point
What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hello everyone
I started this thread to see our lovely note 2 performance in benchmark apps, please mention if u running on Stock ROM or Custom Rom
here's mine, Stock Not Rooted 4.1.1:
AnTuTu:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quadrant:
Vellamo:
NenaMark2:
Hope to see ur results
Completely Stock 4.1.2
^^^^
I see an improvement in 4.1.2, browser and graphics, 1000 more points in Quadrant, about 80 in Vellamo
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
Mine.....
Android 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Devashish Lodh said:
Mine.....
Android 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why the low score !!!
I don't know why everyone is obsessed with benchmark results, benchmarks offer very rough results for the estimated performance of your device. If you run any benchmark twice in a row, under the same conditions, it would give 2 completely varrying results, which clearly shows that results are very unreliable and doesn't necessarily mirror to real world performance.
My old Motorola atrix 4g which is a dual core tegra 2 android device overclocked to 1.4GHz used to score an average of 6000 on quadrant, which is pretty much around what most people get on our quad core Notes, but if you compare both phones in terms of real world performance its not even a competition, the note 2 feels 3 generations ahead.
This is mine..
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Here's mine.
4.1.2 DLL4....XEF
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Samsung Galaxy Note 2 - Jelly Bean 4.1.1
Quadrant:
Note2Core Kernel
CPU: 1920Mhz, 1425mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
AnTuTu:
Perseus Kernel
CPU: 1800Mhz, 1250mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
Geekbench 2:
Note2Core Kernel
CPU: 1920Mhz, 1425mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
nidhish91 said:
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disable Power saving
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
@ cyber.bg
Awesome scores
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
to be honest, i have no idea how i scored this high. stock rom unrooted, stock clocks. i was scoring 6000 on 4.1.1, but then 4.1.2 bumped my score higher by a notable amount. i'll just assume better drivers =)
nidhish91 said:
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Change your kernel or Overclock at your own risk.
top speed award goes to me.. (NO ITS NOT HACKED)
haldi15 said:
top speed award goes to me.. (NO ITS NOT HACKED)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Godlike!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Some of these scores are just too good to be true... :good:
Souai said:
to be honest, i have no idea how i scored this high. stock rom unrooted, stock clocks. i was scoring 6000 on 4.1.1, but then 4.1.2 bumped my score higher by a notable amount. i'll just assume better drivers =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well on antutu this new dll4 rom version raised my gpu scores a lot. So they must have done something right. Also on quadrant my fps went from 40 -> 60 with new drivers. With stock kernel and wicked rom.
Mashari_F said:
Disable Power saving
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow didnt know disabling power saver would boost my cell godlike!!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
wtf!
Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk 2