Database Users

[POLL] Which ROM yeilds the highest Quadrant score?

Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!

TylerD004 said:
Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
useless..scores can be faked easily

ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention, my highest quadrant scores (1600ish) come from the ROM that feels the least smooth overall for me. I'm using virt 2.6 right now and I get around 1400 on the first pass and it is the smoothest (scrolling, previews, in general not lagging when I try to do something) sense ROM I have used. God knows I've used them all at one point or another.

i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.

ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, please don't fake scores so that our community can work together to find the fastest ROM.

Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.

bhazard451 said:
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I happen to agree. Its blazing fast. Still needs some things for me to be able to switch over to it, but I wouldn't mind going full time on a vanilla ROM.
The smoothest sense ROM Ive used is Virtuous, but the more feature packed roms like SR and CM have more stuff than I need.

Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.

larsrya8 said:
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.

why is this under development?

TylerD004 said:
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Discuss the DEVELOPMENT of ROMs. This actually should go in Q&A. Your need for attention is trumped by the topic of the forum, IMO.

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freakin hilarious!

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's too easy to call BS on this one.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u2 godliest rom ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pentium II doesn't even score that high.
Sent from XDA App
Unrevoked Root and Sucked-off
2.0.5 Baseband
SkyRaider 3.0 Vanilla
#1 King Bad F*cking **** Kernel OC to 1.13

Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.

I'm running Ruby 1.1.1 and I get around 1350 which is about 150 less than what I was getting with stock froyo with KingKernel 1 overclocked to 1.15, but Ruby runs smoother and faster for me which will always matter more than a dumb benchmark number

Running virtuous 2.6 with KingxKernel BFS #4 gets me 1637 @ 1.19GHz, one of my friend gets 1693.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

shabubu said:
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This forum is inherently about tinkering. People who tinker like metrics. My 2400 winpoint on Homerun Baseball 3d is a pointless number too, but I still like making it higher
It's a fun stat that doesn't mean much, but it's still fun.

Did they move this thread I clicked General not development?
Droid Incredible General
Discussion about the Verizon HTC Droid Incredible (tips & tricks, etc)

Best Quadrant Score?

Hey guys I was just wondering what's your best Quadrant score you've had on your HD2? I got what I think is a fairly high quadrant score today and I was fairly impressed.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

i think 2300 or 2700 somewhere in between

I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.

You beat my score!

johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not totally irrelevant, but sometimes close to it. Quadrant standard is useless, pro is a little better.
The problem with Quadrant is:
1) Disk IO test, if you try some of the builds with very high score you'll see it's coming from IO, you can just mount that one part that Quadrant use in RAM, get crazy high score, but that won't speed up any other apps/system as you still use your NAND/SD card
2) Video speed, as on early Darkstone builds video score was very low as that build had something turned off (because with it's ON there were other bugs), but all apps were using some other API for video, so only Quadrant was slow on it
3) Quadrant tests doesn't show real system performance, so higher score might have no increase in speed in other apps. For example you can put newest CPU on your PC, but having only 256mb RAM would make everything slow, no matter how fast your CPU is, but CPU score would be higher
This doesn't mean that Quadrant is bad, in my opinion if you're using pro version and you get some component score (for example CPU score) higher on one build then on other - that's good. If you get total score higher, build might be actually slower then other build with low score.

this is the old 1.32... at 1200mhz cedes sd build.
with the new 1.72... dhd base i get max 5000 cpu points and approx 5000 I/O points with data on ext4 partition. that makes 2400 overall quadrant points. at 998 mhz. but if i put all data to nand the I/O points are 1250, but the device feels faster and boots faster. for now i only put app folder on the ext4 partition, dalvik and data remain on internal memory. i am still testing whats the best combo, it takes lot of time

johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your right there.
I don't use Quadrant much but i got over 3000 before (using Darkstones SUPERAM)

Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Skellyyy said:
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?

SuperNAND got about 4000.
Proof:
Someone beat this . Quadrant scores are garbage, it proves nothing.

jonny68 said:
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm on my phone right now I can't get the link but its the DHD build by Andrew something. Should be on the first page in the NAND forum.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Xoom HRI66-from-HRI39 raises Quadrant benchmark 23%

Getting amazing improvement after applying the update. Yes, I repeated this twice to be sure: "No overclock"
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Very impressive. A lot of people have been mentioning snappiness from the update and this backs that up.

I wanna see what this update looks like with OC kernels.

my quadrant and best linpack
Kernal: coolbho3000 v2 1.5GHz
Governer: Interactive
Quadrant: 3072
Linpack: 64.191MFlops

arrtoodeetoo said:
I wanna see what this update looks like with OC kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the 3.0.1 update, have you or anyone else tried the OC (1.5) kernel that everyone's been missing with. I thought I had read over in that thread that there were issues with it now (FC's?). Not sure if I should even bother with flashing it at this point.

lasphyxial said:
my quadrant and best linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is this with the 1.5 ghz OC kernel?

I,m using the oc kernel with 3.0.1, no FCs at all.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

whitedragon33 said:
I,m using the oc kernel with 3.0.1, no FCs at all.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And there was no issue installing it using the exact same files/instructions from before the 3.0.1 update?

I used the apk that jrummy made to install the update for rooted users and it worked like a charm and I still have my overclocked kernel. I didn't have to reinstall the overclocked kernel after the update.
from my Xoom using XDA App

Well I'm not sure what is going on with this kernel. After updating to 3.0.1, then unlocking, then rooting, I went through the procedure for flashing this kernel just as I had done last week. I was able to successfully send the xoom_ocboot.img, then rebooted in fastboot, then remounted, then pushed the bcm4329.ko kernel (verified afterwards by looking with Root Explorer), then rebooted in adb, but the kernel didn't take. The kernel from the 3.0.1 update is still in effect.
What gives??!?!
Maybe I should try the tiamat kernel instead? Whats the difference?
EDIT: I ended up wiping everything and starting from scratch, and this time I modded the OC first, THEN I used the update installer app to update to 3.0.1, which worked perfectly.

despich said:
... and I still have my overclocked kernel. I didn't have to reinstall the overclocked kernel after the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHS; and no issues here.
FWIW, SetCPU shows I'm running 216-1504, but my best LinPack is only ~44.

My original quadrant scores were between 1800-1900. I got the update, and they are still in the same area, no jump to 2100+ like in your attached photo. Was kinda sad cuz I noticed some choppiness while playing Dungeon Defenders and probably could have used that boost to fix it up.
...Then, just to be sure, I restarted it. My scores now match yours. I mean, it already restarted when it updated, but whatever. So if anybody else wants the boost, be sure to do another restart. I rarely restart so it would be a shame for anyone to miss out on a performance boost.

MichaelWestin said:
... Then, just to be sure, I restarted it. My scores now match yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sumbitch. After a restart, my (1.5GHz OCed) device now gets 2454. Before that, it was less than yours.
OP, what do you use to make screenshots? Neither "Shoot Me" nor ... (uh, another one I tried) work. I'm rooted BTW.

kcrudup said:
OP, what do you use to make screenshots? Neither "Shoot Me" nor ... (uh, another one I tried) work. I'm rooted BTW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshots were with the Dalvik Debug Monitor in the SDK Tools.

I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.

Who cares about quadrant, should be using Smartbench 2011 anyway.

quadrant is a terrible benchmarking application.
scores are very inconsistent. if you rerun the application you will get a higher score.
btw, going from 3.0 to 3.01 did not give any improvement in terms of snappiness.

eloist said:
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same. Quadrant has always been this way, however - not everyone gets the same scores.

eloist said:
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must add that my experience is the same. My Xoom has been getting around 1820 regardless of update or reboots.

nubsors said:
Who cares about quadrant, should be using Smartbench 2011 anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just DL'd Smartbench 2011 and ran it. I must say I'm very pleased. All of the stock Xooms running 3.0.1 are getting between 2945-2963. Mine scored a 3329 and is running stock ROM & kernel on 3.0.1. Am quite happy now!

Quadrant Advanced scores!!!!

samsung galaxy s quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz custom rom ext 4 fps uncapped
Total 2014
Cpu. 1691
Mem 1780
I/o. 5359
2d. 359
3d. 1027
samsung galaxy s2 quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz stock rom
Total 3381
Cpu. 7046
Mem 3823
I/o. 3929
2d. 888
3d. 1199
Im getting it! Lol

7000 for CPU?!

screenshot or link would be nice

demo23019 said:
screenshot or link would be nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html

Yeah that's the link. Wait until the devs get a hold of this phone and tweak the I/o speed, uncap the gpu and of the cpu. Imagine the score then. Sanding as redeem themselves from the behold 2 and the gps issues of the original sgs. IT ALSO SCORED A 47 MFLOPS IN LINPACK IN 1.55s. BEASTING.

MikeyMike01 said:
7000 for CPU?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.

KingKuba13 said:
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try comparing GLBenchmark scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

golf2vr6 said:
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rotating planets missing textures , there is not suppose to be pale planets and white background. Also reports of several high profile games not working...
I really wish Samsung used Nvidia tegra or PowerVR SGX , those two companys were in GPU business long time they can write proper GPU drivers , mali is peace of crap.

Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.

Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

rovex said:
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its actually issue with Quadrant. Quadrant advanced and professional editions are stuck at version 1.1.6 which is known to have issues with phones running Gingerbread ROMs like SGS2.
So those scores are flawed.
Standard edition has been upgraded to version 1.1.7 which works without these issues with gingerbread. Ironically those who paid are left in ditch at the moment with lack of update

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
lol quadrant

Makes sense. Its probably why Advanced gives me consistently 5 to 10% lower scores. The textures do seem unstable, sometimes they work, sometimes not.

MaBlo said:
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.

KingKuba13 said:
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wonder if samsung is going to cap the frame rate on the tegra 2 version of the phone?

Challenge anyone!

Let's have some fun SHIFTERS! After months of headaches, tweaking, finding the right rom, the right kernel, I finally got my SHIFTY optimized!
I'll put my SHIFT up against any other SHIFT out there! Post a screenshot of your best benchmark, I dare u! WHAT!!!! Let's gooooooooo, keep it civil and be HONEST playas!!!

This has already been done. Lets see you get 4200+ in Antutu, ****in noob.
Also get me a hotel room in Hawaii or I'll have you banned.
jkjkjkjkjk

Let's do it again WTF!!! I wanna show off! Ill get u a room alright @ the volcano inn its paradise! LOL
Let Me Put My Shift In U

Hey, I'm sure some other noobs out there wouldn't mine playin' along old timer!!! LOL
Let Me Put My Shift In U

Ironically enough, since I got my newest replacement, I haven't ran a single linpack, antutu (which is biased because it brings the sdcard into play), or quadrant... 6 months ago it mattered to me... lmao! :beer:
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk

We need more noobs in here! I'm surrounded by old time, first generation shifters, LOL
Let Me Put My Shift In U

Kinda like drob said, benchmarks really don't mean much to me, it doesn't really translate to real world performance... But I'll play along
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk

Please post Antutu and linpack scores. NOT Quadrant.

VICODAN said:
Please post Antutu and linpack scores. NOT Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, sorry I didn't realize there were rules to this challenge. Honestly, I don't care about any of them as they mean absolutely nothing. I was just amusing the OP with a random benchmark. As you should know Antutu also scores on SD speed, which can cause lopsided scores and has very little to do with the day to day performance of my phone.

I know u old timers don't care, its just for fun for us noobs!!!
Let Me Put My Shift In U

I'm an overclocker at heart but for the phones....it doesn't really matter once it runs smooth. But I still do test out my benchmarks at times to see what each rom produces.

crump84 said:
Oh, sorry I didn't realize there were rules to this challenge. Honestly, I don't care about any of them as they mean absolutely nothing. I was just amusing the OP with a random benchmark. As you should know Antutu also scores on SD speed, which can cause lopsided scores and has very little to do with the day to day performance of my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
letmeputdatipin said:
I know u old timers don't care, its just for fun for us noobs!!!
Let Me Put My Shift In U
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
blakeatl said:
I'm an overclocker at heart but for the phones....it doesn't really matter once it runs smooth. But I still do test out my benchmarks at times to see what each rom produces.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1296614
---------- Post added at 12:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 PM ----------
beat this score and tell us how you did it:

This is why benchmarks mean absolutely nothing unless your a noob. http://www.droidxforums.com/forum/droid-x-hacks/25510-quadrant-benchmark-score-improvement.html
I'll find some more links in time
Benchmarks can also be manipulated I'll find some links to those to. And you know the higher scores you get the more the battery is going to drain...

You're lucky I dont have either of my first two shifts... Those things had boss cpu's... Ill flash an aosp rom and post... And antutu is biased bro, no matter which way you look at it, it is biased... Post linpacks and quadrant standard as they measure the phones performance and not the sd card...
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk

Read this info on setcpu...the higher frequency you cpu is running at the more your battery is going to drain. And when you think about it it's really hard on your phone to run at those higher frequencies, both on the cpu and the battery. So if you want to drain/overheat your battery look for the best benchmark in rom/kernel. It will be faster than crap but again it's a toss-up. If you want battery to last run a rom/kernel that will get lower benchmarkmark scores but still runs smooth. A lot of things play into benchmarks, performance and battery not just the kernel, but the rom and device as well. Just do some research you'll see what I mean.
http://www.setcpu.com/

blakeatl said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kernel and what ROM?

drob311 said:
You're lucky I dont have either of my first two shifts... Those things had boss cpu's... Ill flash an aosp rom and post... And antutu is biased bro, no matter which way you look at it, it is biased... Post linpacks and quadrant standard as they measure the phones performance and not the sd card...
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's setcpu

VICODAN said:
What kernel and what ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MIUI 2.1.20 with the kernel that it came with (thinking Tiamat).

Ive tried everything i can think of but i still cant get past 3822 benchmark so theres no need for me to post a pic.