Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
TylerD004 said:
Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
useless..scores can be faked easily
ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention, my highest quadrant scores (1600ish) come from the ROM that feels the least smooth overall for me. I'm using virt 2.6 right now and I get around 1400 on the first pass and it is the smoothest (scrolling, previews, in general not lagging when I try to do something) sense ROM I have used. God knows I've used them all at one point or another.
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, please don't fake scores so that our community can work together to find the fastest ROM.
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
bhazard451 said:
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I happen to agree. Its blazing fast. Still needs some things for me to be able to switch over to it, but I wouldn't mind going full time on a vanilla ROM.
The smoothest sense ROM Ive used is Virtuous, but the more feature packed roms like SR and CM have more stuff than I need.
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
larsrya8 said:
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
why is this under development?
TylerD004 said:
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Discuss the DEVELOPMENT of ROMs. This actually should go in Q&A. Your need for attention is trumped by the topic of the forum, IMO.
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freakin hilarious!
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's too easy to call BS on this one.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u2 godliest rom ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pentium II doesn't even score that high.
Sent from XDA App
Unrevoked Root and Sucked-off
2.0.5 Baseband
SkyRaider 3.0 Vanilla
#1 King Bad F*cking **** Kernel OC to 1.13
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
I'm running Ruby 1.1.1 and I get around 1350 which is about 150 less than what I was getting with stock froyo with KingKernel 1 overclocked to 1.15, but Ruby runs smoother and faster for me which will always matter more than a dumb benchmark number
Running virtuous 2.6 with KingxKernel BFS #4 gets me 1637 @ 1.19GHz, one of my friend gets 1693.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
shabubu said:
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This forum is inherently about tinkering. People who tinker like metrics. My 2400 winpoint on Homerun Baseball 3d is a pointless number too, but I still like making it higher
It's a fun stat that doesn't mean much, but it's still fun.
Did they move this thread I clicked General not development?
Droid Incredible General
Discussion about the Verizon HTC Droid Incredible (tips & tricks, etc)
Related
Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.
omg!
(yeah, that's about all I have to say)
I believe I read somewhere that they were gonna do a captivate specific ROM via bionix. Pretty sure it is for 2.1, linpack is @12 MFLOPS and open GL site shows it on 2.1.-impressive? Yes . Can't say that I wouldnt take it for a spin though. Hopefully 2.2 will soon follow
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
kennethpenn said:
Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, with the back panel on the Captivate being metal, you might burn your hand with this setup.
kennethpenn said:
Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its real...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
designgears said:
Its real...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I came buckets
Dg do you have your hand in this cookie jar as well? Can we expect an overclocked version of cog 10? Lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I'll pretty sure they're gonna make z4mod their base. They're also going to implement led button notifications (;
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Yup its real his name is morfic. I briefly saw him and unhelpful chatting about it. I cant believe this thing is stable... only bad side is that it only runs eclair till we get source for froyo kernel.
Man I've been wanting to push this badboy past 1.2 ghz
Stable and tentative... Could see 1800! I was just thinking today (with the droid oc and all) when another one would come our way. I guess it was just a matter of time. And boy did it ever come!! Great thing is there is already plans to bring it our way
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I wanna see the screen shot with them running "quadrant advanced" to see the cpu score!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This one is Cognition 8.1 with z4mod.
Damn!!! I just read it as well, cant wait to give it a spin some day
if you read the current setup required for that 3k+ quadrant score, he said he was running OCLF, so drop between 500-700 points just for that to get a more realistic voodoo score. it's impressive, don't get me wrong, but it isn't as astounding because a lot of that score is still from OCLF (hell you can get 2500 with 1.2GHz and OCLF)...
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.
Kaik541 said:
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my phone doesn't run well with a simple 1.2 GHz OC... so I'm skeptical of a stable 1.6 OC kernel.
Quadrant is just terrible. Any comparison scores should be taken using Advanced with the I/O test subtracted. But, even then, it only scores Qualcomm MSM processors "correctly."
Kaik541 said:
if you read the current setup required for that 3k+ quadrant score, he said he was running OCLF, so drop between 500-700 points just for that to get a more realistic voodoo score. it's impressive, don't get me wrong, but it isn't as astounding because a lot of that score is still from OCLF (hell you can get 2500 with 1.2GHz and OCLF)...
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It also gets 78fps in neocore versus ~55fps stock and it removes the fps cap. Issues with 1.2ghz seem to be due to undervolting rather than overclocking to 1.2ghz. In my experience it has worked fine at 1.2ghz without undervolt.
http://phandroid.com/2010/10/27/lat...-unlock-achieving-78-0-breaks-3k-on-quadrant/
WickedStyx said:
It also gets 78fps in neocore versus ~55fps stock and it removes the fps cap. Issues with 1.2ghz seem to be due to undervolting rather than overclocking to 1.2ghz. In my experience it has worked fine at 1.2ghz without undervolt.
http://phandroid.com/2010/10/27/lat...-unlock-achieving-78-0-breaks-3k-on-quadrant/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, but I never questioned the FPS cap, I have no idea what affects that so I can't question it. besides, it's not like our eyes can see much more than 30 FPS, so the difference between 60 FPS and 78 FPS means little to me (in day to day usage). also, I never said anything about undervolting either or made a comment about the 1.2 GHz overclock. Mine runs fine with a 1.2 GHz overclock and the hummingbird processor has already been theorized to be stable up to 1.6 GHz, so this isn't really news, just the first time someone is advertising it as fully implemented. and, what stable means, is it runs across all the devices without things like the "sleep of death" effect occuring (which still happened for SOME with the 1.2 GHz OC).
so until I can personally see 1.6 GHz on my phone without any ill effects on battery life (which should only be minimal if the CPU is being scaled dynamically) or sleep death effects, I won't make a judgment... which is what I already said
This is awesome though! Woot woot!
Who needs a Galaxy S 2 with this?
2GHZ OC here we come!
Will hopefully find out soon a dl link for the vibrant ROM is in new thread "Manhattan project." Viral black posted that they have a Captivate but will try to port to every sgs variant possible. Captivate will be 2nd I would suppose. Sombionix did say they were working on a 2.2 ROM, so hopefully this will meet froyo in the not so distant future. It seemed to be working well from the posts that I read. Then again it is still early.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Can be downloaded now:
"Manhattan Project"
http://www.teamwhiskey.com/home/downloads
I was running a nice 1650 on average now I can't even get passed 1300?! I'm overcloked at nearly 1500mhz on the desire energy Rom. Anyone know what could be up with this??
Sent from my Android Powered HD2 using XDA App
why does it matter? its just a pointless benchmark
If the build you are using is running smooth and stable, what is the point of worrying about useless quadrant scores.
Overclocking your phone to hell is only going to bring about its demise that much sooner.
Regards.
I aint run a quadrant score for months, coz there is no need to.
As long as it's running smooth and quick, who cares?
But i ran one to post up here for a laugh...lol
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
matt
matthew33 said:
I aint run a quadrant score for months, coz there is no need to.
As long as it's running smooth and quick, who cares?
But i ran one to post up here for a laugh...lol
matt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's a hell of a quadrant score! what rom are you using? are you overclocking?
The Desire HD based roms show an I/O score MUCH higher than everyone else, so it bumps up the overall quadrant score.
Quadrant does not reflect performance to any degree, I've had CM6 ROMs bench 1300 and run much much faster and smoother than any DHD roms, it's pretty worthless actually.
The only ROMs I've seen that have really high quadrant scores and perform super smooth/fast are MIUI roms.
orangekid said:
The Desire HD based roms show an I/O score MUCH higher than everyone else, so it bumps up the overall quadrant score.
Quadrant does not reflect performance to any degree, I've had CM6 ROMs bench 1300 and run much much faster and smoother than any DHD roms, it's pretty worthless actually.
The only ROMs I've seen that have really high quadrant scores and perform super smooth/fast are MIUI roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly....that was on overclocked desire HD rom...and i removed it coz it was SOOOO sluggish.
Now got standard desire rom...NOT overclocked and it's flying.
Quadrant scores = not very much...lol ;-)
matt
My score seems to go down over time the more I load the phone with apps and junk
we would call quadrant a PISS test for the phones like 3d mark is to pc
Linteam project..
Regards,
Bududroid
HD2 TMOUSA
rom : TyphoonCyanogenMod 7
radio: 2.15.50.14
LINTEAM LEADER(gpu dev)
bududroid said:
Linteam project..
Regards,
Bududroid
HD2 TMOUSA
rom : TyphoonCyanogenMod 7
radio: 2.15.50.14
LINTEAM LEADER(gpu dev)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what is this? explain please.
greg17477 said:
what is this? explain please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The app is called "Quadrant Standard" which supposedly represents your cell phone's performance
Don_Esteban said:
The app is called "Quadrant Standard" which supposedly represents your cell phone's performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hehe, thx for your answer, but i actually meant what is this linteam project and how come this huge 2d performance
btw its not the standard, but advanced version of quadrant.
bududroid said:
Linteam project..
Regards,
Bududroid
HD2 TMOUSA
rom : TyphoonCyanogenMod 7
radio: 2.15.50.14
LINTEAM LEADER(gpu dev)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is your 2D that high?
Use smartbench 2011
If you guys want to know the answer to bududroid's score visit the thread below.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=971063
I know I could have just gave you the answer but ill make you read the 3 pages mauahahaaaaaaa. But you can hear him explain it so read it up.
bududroid said:
Linteam project..
Regards,
Bududroid
HD2 TMOUSA
rom : TyphoonCyanogenMod 7
radio: 2.15.50.14
LINTEAM LEADER(gpu dev)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is that overclocked?
aqblood said:
is that overclocked?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looking at the cpu score, its underclocked i would say. on overclocked devices you should get over 6000 cpu points.
I've tested about 20 roms/build now, and my expirence tells me: the higher the Quadrant score, the laggier the rom...
Well even I don't believe in these tests...they just for the paper.
Sent from my..Bla Bla
Here, I prove that synthetic benchmarks fail.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My god.... How the heck did you do it?
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
I got 3147 quadrant with miui rc4 and oc to 1300MHz.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
progene81 said:
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so called lag fix for start, and some other tweaks including OC.
But lag fix itself gives a huge boost in quadrant.
I do agree synthetic benchmarks suck especially concerning phones since there are many chips, and many other optimizations for particular CPUs, and they're not equal in either implementation or HW is so much different that comparisons are pointless.
For instance snapdragon might lack with raw power, and our hummingbird is better, but when it comes to SIMD instruction ALUs snapdragon wins + quadrant's optimization for snapdragon et viola...
rschenck said:
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda like this?:
theduckking said:
Kinda like this?:
View attachment 565756
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
rschenck said:
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
theduckking said:
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there an App for that?
I made this score
Using GingerCriskelo V27 and CF-Root 3.0
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
My score:
+ The feeling of a pretty darn fast ROM
Of course the usage was pretty low over the weekend but still^^
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Tk-Glitch said:
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 - Use a RAMdisk for Quadrant storage;
2 - Use old graphics driver from NS;
3 - Overclock.
Overclocking the bus will lead to faster RAM, so faster I/O score from the RAMdisk.
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 1.2GHz. Sorry^^.
At 1GHz, ~4000.
And with 1.4GHz, 4800-4900.
1.5GHz here :
Now 1.4GHz only, but with a faster bus speed, resulting in a boost on I/O and memory scores :
EDIT : Added *lololz* screenshot.
EDIT2 : Replaced *lololz* screenshot by a 1.5GHz one for even more LULZ.
EDIT3 : Added faster bus speed to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
edited
10 chars
coldflid said:
Photoshop...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Tk-Glitch said:
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i didn't mean yours, i totally believe yours, i meant the one on the first post, and now that i look it more closely it doesn't seem fake.
Sorry
I don't know how I got this, I usually only get 4100 and 4200 max but some how I ended up getting 4451! This defiantly competes with the SGS2. Please post any score you have here!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
LOL, and our OC isn't even near as high! 1.1 vs 1.5 ghz!!
SICK! Wow I cant f**king wait!
Chubby_Skunk said:
SICK! Wow I cant f**king wait!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL if we break 1.1... that would be amazing. I wouldn't be surprised to see wayy over 5000!
Do yal not understand how out of date quadrant is? Its results are worthless on any dualcore phone period.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
jug6ernaut said:
Do yal not understand how out of date quadrant is? Its results are worthless on any dualcore phone period.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, yeah I'm pretty sure every one knows that. It's just fun being silly with it
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Why is that ?... post about a quadrant score , which is an app .
Is there any good benchmark for dual core ?
ofek said:
Why is that ?... post about a quadrant score , which is an app .
Is there any good benchmark for dual core ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's called real lief performance.
If everything works with no lag = epic bench mark
If something lags = crappy software
xploited said:
Yeah, it's called real lief performance.
If everything works with no lag = epic bench mark
If something lags = crappy software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol +0+0+0+0+0+1= +1
Use Chain Fire (CF) Bench... much better for dual core
CaelanT said:
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well this is sort of where this kind of benchmark stuff has always been.
CaelanT said:
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is an App
1. How are you doing a quadrant benchmark? Mine errors out at "decoding video". (10/12)
2. I am working on a 1.2 ghz overclock kernel. So far a lot of bugs, maybe that's why quadrant failed... if I succeed, I will try 1.4... if I can even out the major bugs I will release it.
Also, just want to add that on said kernel I got a 6752 overall in Chainfire...
Kthxbai
Sent from my friend's Atrix
trvstw said:
1. How are you doing a quadrant benchmark? Mine errors out at "decoding video". (10/12)
2. I am working on a 1.2 ghz overclock kernel. So far a lot of bugs, maybe that's why quadrant failed... if I succeed, I will try 1.4... if I can even out the major bugs I will release it.
Also, just want to add that on said kernel I got a 6752 overall in Chainfire...
Kthxbai
Sent from my friend's Atrix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're likely getting an error at "decoding video" because you have used your camera. In order to get quadrant to work properly, you have to run a benchmark before you've opened the camera and caused it to force close.
thegregulator said:
You're likely getting an error at "decoding video" because you have used your camera. In order to get quadrant to work properly, you have to run a benchmark before you've opened the camera and caused it to force close.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
Sent from my friend's Atrix
Smartbench 2011
Awesome Benchmark...
does graphics tests
whats the point hight quadrant or any benchmark if the phone stills laggy and can't play 720p lose the fingerprint captabilities and webtop?!
if you want hight quadrant without webtop and fingerprint buy another phone xD lol
just saying.....please don't interpret me wrong
or, if you want all those features, don't install a pre-beta version of a ROM?
highest quadrant score i've gotten so far is 3400-3500, what are you guys doing with your settings to get so high?
Alcapone263 said:
or, if you want all those features, don't install a pre-beta version of a ROM?
highest quadrant score i've gotten so far is 3400-3500, what are you guys doing with your settings to get so high?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure how many times you've tried the test, but I did it about five times in a row and each time my score raised by about 150 until it steadied at 4200 or so. Make sure to free as much RAM and extra processor usage as possible using a task manager or similar. Also, are you at 1.1Ghz? That's what I'm at with the kernel that came with the CM7 pre-beta install. I believe it is faux's kernel.
vinay427 said:
I'm not sure how many times you've tried the test, but I did it about five times in a row and each time my score raised by about 150 until it steadied at 4200 or so. Make sure to free as much RAM and extra processor usage as possible using a task manager or similar. Also, are you at 1.1Ghz? That's what I'm at with the kernel that came with the CM7 pre-beta install. I believe it is faux's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, and unmount your storage (just plug it into the computer, mass storage)
Evo Shift 4G benchmark CONTEST - lets get this "best kernel" debate out of the way
Who can beat my Antutu (benchmark program available in market) record?
CM7 nightly, min cpu 1900 mhz, max cpu 1900mhz, Toasty gov, hardware version 0004.
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Will post more detailed specs later.
If you're getting over 4000, you're doing it right.
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty (or performance gov depending on kernel) for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.
I actually just beat my record.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I haven't ran it yet with the new pershoot, i get better scores with scary. But I'm still a pershoot fan but for all who care I do (ill test the new pershoot later) get better scores with scary
Teleported from my Shifty Speedy using Tapatalk
we now bow to the master
leadfoot99 said:
we now bow to the master
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, you are limited to five thanks per day.
BTW you are running a really old version of Antutu. Latest version is 2.3.1
that was an old score
246 views, 2 replies. Sad.
I thought you all had more balls than that.
Well there is no real best kernel. Its preference and they also act different on different phones.
Sent from my Supreme Shift Minimally!
Just hearing excuses, no numbers.
You want numbers dude I'm hitting 2300+ on Supreme how's them for numbers while your running Round here bragging about barely hitting 4k overclocked to 1.9 on a stripped down aosp ROM I'm doing 2300 on Supreme with 27 widgets set @ STOCK SPEEDS of 806, if you haven't noticed all us big kids don't care about the numbers because their pointless, this isn't a (maybe I shouldn't have used that word) measuring contest
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
..........................double post
strapped365 said:
You want numbers dude I'm hitting 2300+ on Supreme how's them for numbers while your running Round here bragging about barely hitting 4k overclocked to 1.9 on a stripped down aosp ROM I'm doing 2300 on Supreme with 27 widgets set @ STOCK SPEEDS of 806, if you haven't noticed all us big kids don't care about the numbers because their pointless, this isn't a (maybe I shouldn't have used that word) measuring contest
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I care. And that's why I made the thread. Want to see how I can get the best performance out of my phone. Obviously, this cannot be done on a sense 3.0 rom until the kernel source gets released.
VICODAN said:
I care. And that's why I made the thread. Want to see how I can get the best performance out of my phone. Obviously, this cannot be done on a sense 3.0 rom until the kernel source gets released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What where trying to say is the title is misleading the purpose of the thread (or your being misleaded yourself) "the best kernel" is not based on how high the numbers can get on a benchmark score. I've had sense run as fast as AOSP and not get close to its points, For me I get the best performance (when using AOSP) using pershootv9 its very smooth, scary can give numbers in the 4,000's but with my phone its pershoot that responds the best.
High numbers, do NOT measure performance
Sent from my Supreme Shift through a minimal tunnel
notsointeresting said:
What where trying to say is the title is misleading the purpose of the thread (or your being misleaded yourself) "the best kernel" is not based on how high the numbers can get on a benchmark score. I've had sense run as fast as AOSP and not get close to its points, For me I get the best performance (when using AOSP) using pershootv9 its very smooth, scary can give numbers in the 4,000's but with my phone its pershoot that responds the best.
High numbers, do NOT measure performance
Sent from my Supreme Shift through a minimal tunnel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pershoot responds like crap on my phone. I realize there are different hardware versions. This is more of a benchmarker/tweaker thread. I want to see who can get the best benchmarks and with what kernel.
Linpack does a benchmark of raw megaflops. If you don't want to use antutu fine, linpack is good enough for me:
In computing, FLOPS (or flops or flop/s, for floating point operations per second) is a measure of a computer's performance, especially in fields of scientific calculations that make heavy use of floating point calculations, similar to the older, simpler, instructions per second. Since the final S stands for "second", conservative speakers consider "FLOPS" as both the singular and plural of the term, although the singular "FLOP" is frequently encountered. Alternatively, the singular FLOP (or flop) is used as an abbreviation for "FLoating-point OPeration", and a flop count is a count of these operations (e.g., required by a given algorithm or computer program). In this context, "flops" is simply the plural rather than a rate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stock
Stock rooted 2.2 @806 also. 2331
VICODAN said:
Pershoot responds like crap on my phone. I realize there are different hardware versions. This is more of a benchmarker/tweaker thread. I want to see who can get the best benchmarks and with what kernel.
Linpack does a benchmark of raw megaflops. If you don't want to use antutu fine, linpack is good enough for me:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok that's fine, if thats what your aiming for though the title of this thread is a little misleading.
and when I say each phone functions different its not just by hardware version, yes the shift has 2 (0005 for the newer ones) but theres many other factors that makes the phone respond differently. there not all built the same.
and just to share a linpack score for the hell of it- 42 on Supreme Sense
notsointeresting said:
Ok that's fine, if thats what your aiming for though the title of this thread is a little misleading.
and when I say each phone functions different its not just by hardware version, yes the shift has 2 (0005 for the newer ones) but theres many other factors that makes the phone respond differently. there not all built the same.
and just to share a linpack score for the hell of it- 42 on Supreme Sense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very good for Sense. Thanks for sharing. Was that multi or single threaded?
doublepost
VICODAN said:
Very good for Sense. Thanks for sharing. Was that multi or single threaded?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Single, since multi-thread is meant more for dual-core phones
notsointeresting said:
Single, since multi-thread is meant more for dual-core phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I thought the Shift had a multi threaded processor, dual core or not. Interesting. Thanks for your numbers.