Just wondering what other peoples epic can pull off in quadrant so I guess post a screenshot below and tell us what your running.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
me personally am running Legendary ROM 3.3 w/ IAP Rebirth kernel.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
dunno how to capture screen.. mine is 2516.
im on acs ics v4 ei22
no O/C
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Screenshot it worked for me and for overclock you use voltage control if you'd like to.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Score: 2665
SyndicateROM Frozen 1.2
Genocide Kernel 2.0
OC 1400 Mhz
I an quite happy with my score.
1.4 GHz.
My daily driver OC is 1.2 and that gets me a 3292.
ACS ICS EI22 V2.
Send from my SPH-D700 (Samsung Epic 4G)
Quadrant is pointless for measuring real world performance.. but here is my highest:
1.6ghz on ACS Bamboozle (EF02)
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
tbob18 said:
Quadrant is pointless for measuring real world performance.. but here is my highest:
1.6ghz on ACS Bamboozle (EF02)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Biggoron said:
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha, yeah. It can be fun, reminds me of my 3Dmark days.
Nothing special, the score is from a few months ago.. I froze most of the services and closed everything (about 130mb ram used in task manager)
I was using Tegrak to OC. Settings were 1600mhz, 1400mv core, and 1125mv internal.
Beware, running your phone at these kind of voltages is dangerous and could kill your phone. At 1.6ghz it was not completely stable and would freeze after about 10-15min.
Yeah I can imagine mine barerly handles 1.4 and likes to freeze just running this app every 30 mins or so. Any scripts or anything if not man could only imagine if you ran the v6 script mine runs at around 120mb of ram in task manager 70 in the running services.
tbob18 said:
Ha, yeah. It can be fun, reminds me of my 3Dmark days.
Nothing special, the score is from a few months ago.. I froze most of the services and closed everything (about 130mb ram used in task manager)
I was using Tegrak to OC. Settings were 1600mhz, 1400mv core, and 1125mv internal.
Beware, running your phone at these kind of voltages is dangerous and could kill your phone. At 1.6ghz it was not completely stable and would freeze after about 10-15min.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Nice scores with the overclocks, too bad they are boosted with quadrant scripts.
Get pro and see how inflated I/O performance is.
I wish devs would stop cheating.
Biggoron said:
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also its good for comparing e-pen1s' =D
From what other sections on XDA have told me, they've said quadrant scores mean nothing. I do believe the benchmark isn't quite accurate.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
MikeEx said:
Nice scores with the overclocks, too bad they are boosted with quadrant scripts.
Get pro and see how inflated I/O performance is.
I wish devs would stop cheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, that's how it goes. Smartbench seems to be more accurate, but it is still a synthetic benchmark.
Biggoron said:
Screenshot it worked for me and for overclock you use voltage control if you'd like to.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I tried O/C it now. I'll post the screenshot later when i get back home.
I got 3603 with a fresh install of StarskyROM 1.4, only tegrak (1.3 Ghz) and quadrant installed. It promptly froze up 2 minutes later. I generally get ~2500 with no O/C on that ROM.
A noobs score. Don't be too harsh!
My quadrant score using legendary rom beta 3.3 on the nubernal+ kernal (EI22) with ICS theme running Go Launcher Ex.
My score is far lower than everyone elses but give me time. I'm still a noob (god that puts a bad taste in my mouth) lol!
Hard to see I know. My screenshot app was working great until yesterday... just over 4000... 4083 I believe
Era legendary rom 4.0.1 overclocked to 1.44 ghz using samurai 1.4 kernel...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
My phone will only support 1.252 or below, but my highest was in the 3800's, with Legendary and IAP
New highest 4504 at 1.5 Ghz
Sent from my OG Epic
Related
Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
TylerD004 said:
Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
useless..scores can be faked easily
ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention, my highest quadrant scores (1600ish) come from the ROM that feels the least smooth overall for me. I'm using virt 2.6 right now and I get around 1400 on the first pass and it is the smoothest (scrolling, previews, in general not lagging when I try to do something) sense ROM I have used. God knows I've used them all at one point or another.
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, please don't fake scores so that our community can work together to find the fastest ROM.
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
bhazard451 said:
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I happen to agree. Its blazing fast. Still needs some things for me to be able to switch over to it, but I wouldn't mind going full time on a vanilla ROM.
The smoothest sense ROM Ive used is Virtuous, but the more feature packed roms like SR and CM have more stuff than I need.
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
larsrya8 said:
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
why is this under development?
TylerD004 said:
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Discuss the DEVELOPMENT of ROMs. This actually should go in Q&A. Your need for attention is trumped by the topic of the forum, IMO.
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freakin hilarious!
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's too easy to call BS on this one.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u2 godliest rom ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pentium II doesn't even score that high.
Sent from XDA App
Unrevoked Root and Sucked-off
2.0.5 Baseband
SkyRaider 3.0 Vanilla
#1 King Bad F*cking **** Kernel OC to 1.13
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
I'm running Ruby 1.1.1 and I get around 1350 which is about 150 less than what I was getting with stock froyo with KingKernel 1 overclocked to 1.15, but Ruby runs smoother and faster for me which will always matter more than a dumb benchmark number
Running virtuous 2.6 with KingxKernel BFS #4 gets me 1637 @ 1.19GHz, one of my friend gets 1693.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
shabubu said:
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This forum is inherently about tinkering. People who tinker like metrics. My 2400 winpoint on Homerun Baseball 3d is a pointless number too, but I still like making it higher
It's a fun stat that doesn't mean much, but it's still fun.
Did they move this thread I clicked General not development?
Droid Incredible General
Discussion about the Verizon HTC Droid Incredible (tips & tricks, etc)
Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.
omg!
(yeah, that's about all I have to say)
I believe I read somewhere that they were gonna do a captivate specific ROM via bionix. Pretty sure it is for 2.1, linpack is @12 MFLOPS and open GL site shows it on 2.1.-impressive? Yes . Can't say that I wouldnt take it for a spin though. Hopefully 2.2 will soon follow
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
kennethpenn said:
Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, with the back panel on the Captivate being metal, you might burn your hand with this setup.
kennethpenn said:
Team Whiskey has been successful in overclocking the T-Mobile Vibrant to 1.6 GHz, according to this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8844947&postcount=41
Pretty incredible stuff. They're working on incorporating voodoo into this kernel right now, then they'll release it.
It sounds too good to be true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its real...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
designgears said:
Its real...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I came buckets
Dg do you have your hand in this cookie jar as well? Can we expect an overclocked version of cog 10? Lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I'll pretty sure they're gonna make z4mod their base. They're also going to implement led button notifications (;
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Yup its real his name is morfic. I briefly saw him and unhelpful chatting about it. I cant believe this thing is stable... only bad side is that it only runs eclair till we get source for froyo kernel.
Man I've been wanting to push this badboy past 1.2 ghz
Stable and tentative... Could see 1800! I was just thinking today (with the droid oc and all) when another one would come our way. I guess it was just a matter of time. And boy did it ever come!! Great thing is there is already plans to bring it our way
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I wanna see the screen shot with them running "quadrant advanced" to see the cpu score!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This one is Cognition 8.1 with z4mod.
Damn!!! I just read it as well, cant wait to give it a spin some day
if you read the current setup required for that 3k+ quadrant score, he said he was running OCLF, so drop between 500-700 points just for that to get a more realistic voodoo score. it's impressive, don't get me wrong, but it isn't as astounding because a lot of that score is still from OCLF (hell you can get 2500 with 1.2GHz and OCLF)...
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.
Kaik541 said:
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my phone doesn't run well with a simple 1.2 GHz OC... so I'm skeptical of a stable 1.6 OC kernel.
Quadrant is just terrible. Any comparison scores should be taken using Advanced with the I/O test subtracted. But, even then, it only scores Qualcomm MSM processors "correctly."
Kaik541 said:
if you read the current setup required for that 3k+ quadrant score, he said he was running OCLF, so drop between 500-700 points just for that to get a more realistic voodoo score. it's impressive, don't get me wrong, but it isn't as astounding because a lot of that score is still from OCLF (hell you can get 2500 with 1.2GHz and OCLF)...
as for a *STABLE* 1.6 GHz OC, I'll believe it when I see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It also gets 78fps in neocore versus ~55fps stock and it removes the fps cap. Issues with 1.2ghz seem to be due to undervolting rather than overclocking to 1.2ghz. In my experience it has worked fine at 1.2ghz without undervolt.
http://phandroid.com/2010/10/27/lat...-unlock-achieving-78-0-breaks-3k-on-quadrant/
WickedStyx said:
It also gets 78fps in neocore versus ~55fps stock and it removes the fps cap. Issues with 1.2ghz seem to be due to undervolting rather than overclocking to 1.2ghz. In my experience it has worked fine at 1.2ghz without undervolt.
http://phandroid.com/2010/10/27/lat...-unlock-achieving-78-0-breaks-3k-on-quadrant/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, but I never questioned the FPS cap, I have no idea what affects that so I can't question it. besides, it's not like our eyes can see much more than 30 FPS, so the difference between 60 FPS and 78 FPS means little to me (in day to day usage). also, I never said anything about undervolting either or made a comment about the 1.2 GHz overclock. Mine runs fine with a 1.2 GHz overclock and the hummingbird processor has already been theorized to be stable up to 1.6 GHz, so this isn't really news, just the first time someone is advertising it as fully implemented. and, what stable means, is it runs across all the devices without things like the "sleep of death" effect occuring (which still happened for SOME with the 1.2 GHz OC).
so until I can personally see 1.6 GHz on my phone without any ill effects on battery life (which should only be minimal if the CPU is being scaled dynamically) or sleep death effects, I won't make a judgment... which is what I already said
This is awesome though! Woot woot!
Who needs a Galaxy S 2 with this?
2GHZ OC here we come!
Will hopefully find out soon a dl link for the vibrant ROM is in new thread "Manhattan project." Viral black posted that they have a Captivate but will try to port to every sgs variant possible. Captivate will be 2nd I would suppose. Sombionix did say they were working on a 2.2 ROM, so hopefully this will meet froyo in the not so distant future. It seemed to be working well from the posts that I read. Then again it is still early.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Can be downloaded now:
"Manhattan Project"
http://www.teamwhiskey.com/home/downloads
Here, I prove that synthetic benchmarks fail.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My god.... How the heck did you do it?
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
I got 3147 quadrant with miui rc4 and oc to 1300MHz.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
progene81 said:
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so called lag fix for start, and some other tweaks including OC.
But lag fix itself gives a huge boost in quadrant.
I do agree synthetic benchmarks suck especially concerning phones since there are many chips, and many other optimizations for particular CPUs, and they're not equal in either implementation or HW is so much different that comparisons are pointless.
For instance snapdragon might lack with raw power, and our hummingbird is better, but when it comes to SIMD instruction ALUs snapdragon wins + quadrant's optimization for snapdragon et viola...
rschenck said:
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda like this?:
theduckking said:
Kinda like this?:
View attachment 565756
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
rschenck said:
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
theduckking said:
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there an App for that?
I made this score
Using GingerCriskelo V27 and CF-Root 3.0
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
My score:
+ The feeling of a pretty darn fast ROM
Of course the usage was pretty low over the weekend but still^^
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Tk-Glitch said:
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 - Use a RAMdisk for Quadrant storage;
2 - Use old graphics driver from NS;
3 - Overclock.
Overclocking the bus will lead to faster RAM, so faster I/O score from the RAMdisk.
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 1.2GHz. Sorry^^.
At 1GHz, ~4000.
And with 1.4GHz, 4800-4900.
1.5GHz here :
Now 1.4GHz only, but with a faster bus speed, resulting in a boost on I/O and memory scores :
EDIT : Added *lololz* screenshot.
EDIT2 : Replaced *lololz* screenshot by a 1.5GHz one for even more LULZ.
EDIT3 : Added faster bus speed to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
edited
10 chars
coldflid said:
Photoshop...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Tk-Glitch said:
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i didn't mean yours, i totally believe yours, i meant the one on the first post, and now that i look it more closely it doesn't seem fake.
Sorry
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?
Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.
Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)
Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?
Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)
vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?
Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.
Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!
@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point
What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hi guys, I have an arc S from a few weeks, after several tests I found a rom that flies in quadrant, these are the results:
4030 pts without overclocking
4739 pts with overclocking @ 2000 (v15 doom-Kernel)
All the other roms, including Cyanogen v 7.2, have a maximum in 2200-2500 pts.
The rom is SE-tweaked.
How can this difference in performance?
i bet that the guy that made that rom included the quadrant hack, nothin special imo.
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
johnbarleycorn said:
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try antutu benchmark and nenamark 2.
antutu 3500-3600 pts
nenamark2 14.8.
The quandrant booster apk not change the results.
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@1.4 without Supercharger V6.
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got 3924 @ 1.6 GHz smartassV2 on my Arc S.
Nice, what ROM do you use?
Even if Benchmarks say nothing about real use, it's nice to compare
Yesterday I made one test @ 1.8GHz and scored 4285 points
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Look in the signature, same ROM you're using.
I'll try 1,8 GHz too, but 2 GHz not any more, seems like my CPU can't handle it.
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium
Nice, sorry. Tapatalk doesn't display signature so I can't see them.
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
arneh1992 said:
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's totally normal to have that score.
The guy just used the quadrant hack, if you run different benchmarks (e.g. AnTuTu, Vellamo, etc.) you'll notice that your device is nearly the same to other results.
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
arneh1992 said:
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is maximum?
Quadrant scores between 1800 and 2400 are normal imo.
I mean like, cause i use arconium, doomkernel and supercharger i thought it would be faster... But getting scores around the 2000 is the maximum for me, or can i get it higher( without overclocking more )? I wanna play a lot of games with minimum lag
Quadrant scores say nothing!
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Well i dont really know why but my Arc with doomkernel v15 @1.6GHz hit the score of 3982 at Antutu benchmark.. Maybe is the sd booster i use..
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App
My V6 custom ROM - NOT released V6 yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}