Hello everyone
I started this thread to see our lovely note 2 performance in benchmark apps, please mention if u running on Stock ROM or Custom Rom
here's mine, Stock Not Rooted 4.1.1:
AnTuTu:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quadrant:
Vellamo:
NenaMark2:
Hope to see ur results
Completely Stock 4.1.2
^^^^
I see an improvement in 4.1.2, browser and graphics, 1000 more points in Quadrant, about 80 in Vellamo
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
Mine.....
Android 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Devashish Lodh said:
Mine.....
Android 4.1.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why the low score !!!
I don't know why everyone is obsessed with benchmark results, benchmarks offer very rough results for the estimated performance of your device. If you run any benchmark twice in a row, under the same conditions, it would give 2 completely varrying results, which clearly shows that results are very unreliable and doesn't necessarily mirror to real world performance.
My old Motorola atrix 4g which is a dual core tegra 2 android device overclocked to 1.4GHz used to score an average of 6000 on quadrant, which is pretty much around what most people get on our quad core Notes, but if you compare both phones in terms of real world performance its not even a competition, the note 2 feels 3 generations ahead.
This is mine..
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Here's mine.
4.1.2 DLL4....XEF
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Samsung Galaxy Note 2 - Jelly Bean 4.1.1
Quadrant:
Note2Core Kernel
CPU: 1920Mhz, 1425mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
AnTuTu:
Perseus Kernel
CPU: 1800Mhz, 1250mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
Geekbench 2:
Note2Core Kernel
CPU: 1920Mhz, 1425mV
GPU: 533Mhz, 1050mV
nidhish91 said:
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disable Power saving
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
@ cyber.bg
Awesome scores
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
to be honest, i have no idea how i scored this high. stock rom unrooted, stock clocks. i was scoring 6000 on 4.1.1, but then 4.1.2 bumped my score higher by a notable amount. i'll just assume better drivers =)
nidhish91 said:
Dafuq, my quadrant score is just higher than OneX. You guys have it stretched till 6000..HOW?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Change your kernel or Overclock at your own risk.
top speed award goes to me.. (NO ITS NOT HACKED)
haldi15 said:
top speed award goes to me.. (NO ITS NOT HACKED)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Godlike!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Some of these scores are just too good to be true... :good:
Souai said:
to be honest, i have no idea how i scored this high. stock rom unrooted, stock clocks. i was scoring 6000 on 4.1.1, but then 4.1.2 bumped my score higher by a notable amount. i'll just assume better drivers =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well on antutu this new dll4 rom version raised my gpu scores a lot. So they must have done something right. Also on quadrant my fps went from 40 -> 60 with new drivers. With stock kernel and wicked rom.
Mashari_F said:
Disable Power saving
Sent fron my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow didnt know disabling power saver would boost my cell godlike!!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
wtf!
Inviato dal mio GT-N7100 con Tapatalk 2
Related
samsung galaxy s quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz custom rom ext 4 fps uncapped
Total 2014
Cpu. 1691
Mem 1780
I/o. 5359
2d. 359
3d. 1027
samsung galaxy s2 quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz stock rom
Total 3381
Cpu. 7046
Mem 3823
I/o. 3929
2d. 888
3d. 1199
Im getting it! Lol
7000 for CPU?!
screenshot or link would be nice
demo23019 said:
screenshot or link would be nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Yeah that's the link. Wait until the devs get a hold of this phone and tweak the I/o speed, uncap the gpu and of the cpu. Imagine the score then. Sanding as redeem themselves from the behold 2 and the gps issues of the original sgs. IT ALSO SCORED A 47 MFLOPS IN LINPACK IN 1.55s. BEASTING.
MikeyMike01 said:
7000 for CPU?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
KingKuba13 said:
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try comparing GLBenchmark scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
golf2vr6 said:
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rotating planets missing textures , there is not suppose to be pale planets and white background. Also reports of several high profile games not working...
I really wish Samsung used Nvidia tegra or PowerVR SGX , those two companys were in GPU business long time they can write proper GPU drivers , mali is peace of crap.
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
rovex said:
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its actually issue with Quadrant. Quadrant advanced and professional editions are stuck at version 1.1.6 which is known to have issues with phones running Gingerbread ROMs like SGS2.
So those scores are flawed.
Standard edition has been upgraded to version 1.1.7 which works without these issues with gingerbread. Ironically those who paid are left in ditch at the moment with lack of update
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
lol quadrant
Makes sense. Its probably why Advanced gives me consistently 5 to 10% lower scores. The textures do seem unstable, sometimes they work, sometimes not.
MaBlo said:
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
KingKuba13 said:
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wonder if samsung is going to cap the frame rate on the tegra 2 version of the phone?
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?
Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.
Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)
Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?
Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)
vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?
Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.
Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!
@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point
What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hi guys, I have an arc S from a few weeks, after several tests I found a rom that flies in quadrant, these are the results:
4030 pts without overclocking
4739 pts with overclocking @ 2000 (v15 doom-Kernel)
All the other roms, including Cyanogen v 7.2, have a maximum in 2200-2500 pts.
The rom is SE-tweaked.
How can this difference in performance?
i bet that the guy that made that rom included the quadrant hack, nothin special imo.
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
johnbarleycorn said:
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try antutu benchmark and nenamark 2.
antutu 3500-3600 pts
nenamark2 14.8.
The quandrant booster apk not change the results.
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@1.4 without Supercharger V6.
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got 3924 @ 1.6 GHz smartassV2 on my Arc S.
Nice, what ROM do you use?
Even if Benchmarks say nothing about real use, it's nice to compare
Yesterday I made one test @ 1.8GHz and scored 4285 points
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Look in the signature, same ROM you're using.
I'll try 1,8 GHz too, but 2 GHz not any more, seems like my CPU can't handle it.
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium
Nice, sorry. Tapatalk doesn't display signature so I can't see them.
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
arneh1992 said:
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's totally normal to have that score.
The guy just used the quadrant hack, if you run different benchmarks (e.g. AnTuTu, Vellamo, etc.) you'll notice that your device is nearly the same to other results.
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
arneh1992 said:
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is maximum?
Quadrant scores between 1800 and 2400 are normal imo.
I mean like, cause i use arconium, doomkernel and supercharger i thought it would be faster... But getting scores around the 2000 is the maximum for me, or can i get it higher( without overclocking more )? I wanna play a lot of games with minimum lag
Quadrant scores say nothing!
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Well i dont really know why but my Arc with doomkernel v15 @1.6GHz hit the score of 3982 at Antutu benchmark.. Maybe is the sd booster i use..
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App
My V6 custom ROM - NOT released V6 yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hi all
sorry if I have posted in the wrong forum.
basically I got my Samsung galaxy s4 i9505 on tract the other week and its amazing, now I have the flipboard app installed now I keep seeing things about Antutu, which upto today iv never used. but now I have.
Its given me a score of 24686
I just want to know if this is a good or bad score.
I understand each device will vary I suppose but if I can improve the score then why not without rooting etc
thank you hope somebody can help me,
arnie2012 said:
Hi all
sorry if I have posted in the wrong forum.
basically I got my Samsung galaxy s4 i9505 on tract the other week and its amazing, now I have the flipboard app installed now I keep seeing things about Antutu, which upto today iv never used. but now I have.
Its given me a score of 24686
I just want to know if this is a good or bad score.
I understand each device will vary I suppose but if I can improve the score then why not without rooting etc
thank you hope somebody can help me,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a decent score I get abt 28000 on my octa core i9500 version
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Yeah my 9505 usually lies between 24500 and 25500
Sounds about right, I got 25558 on my I-9505
27525 - i9500
If owning a smartphone would rely on synthetic benchmarks?
You'll never going to be happy with your purchase...everytime.
titus1 said:
If owning a smartphone would rely on synthetic benchmarks?
You'll never going to be happy with your purchase...everytime.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's nothing but feeling a bit happy and proud about your device
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
benchmarks are so "gingerbread"
get the "feel" of the phone man.
if benchmarks are to be believed, you should get exact ( or even similar) scores in benchmarks. benches are NOTHING. the octa core smokes Antutu, but even it has mild occasional lags.
I just use benches to show off my phone a little.
you got one hell of phone. now uninstall the useless benchmark apps and enjoy.
jokin a bit, hope yaa don't mind.
regards,
Achyut.
my s4 gave 26505
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Got about the same score on my i9505 op.
Sent from my GT-I9505
GT-I93oo said:
my s4 gave 26505
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very bad!!!
Today:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9500 avec Tapatalk
i9505 32GB
Your going to see a lot of variations with your score depending on the temp of your cpu. Our devices run hot and usually throttle under extended heavy loads. The KT kernel throttles at 70c, not sure about the stock kernel. My phone got 24,500 stock and actually sometimes scored lower after I OCed the cpu and gpu. Turns out the problem was throttling. After cheating at cooling my cpu down to 20c in the fridge I got a score of 27,000 :silly: obviously I don't keep my phone in the fridge all the time. The only time I run into throttling issues is when I'm benchmarking, I get the full 2.05ghz under normal use.
I'm a little confused, I have the SHV-E300S(octacore) version and my scores are 23000 - 24000. I think that this scores are a little bit low.
How can improve the scores?
slawrumia said:
i9505 32GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which rom do you have?
And which kernel?
pls stop, it's just numbers. just feel the phone :cyclops:
Not bad but not as high as it should be.
It sound be around the 27000s ranges even for the Octa S4
Btw, here is my bone stock i9505 with 4.3 getting 29000s.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Strange I get around 28000 on my i9505 not overclocked at all.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
skeamznz said:
Strange I get around 28000 on my i9505 not overclocked at all.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clear everything in task manager and you will hit 29000s
I cleared everything with task manager and this was the results.
I repeat that the results are lower than media of the SHV-E300S.
Can anyone help me?
Out of the box benchmark very impressed!
gif upload
MRobbo80 said:
Out of the box benchmark very impressed!
gif upload
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get pretty much the same score with optimize in the power settings!
kossiewossie said:
I get pretty much the same score with optimize in the power settings!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a slightly higher score out of the box not by much but still an awesome tablet!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-hBmPylPQw
Just posted to compare. Taken from Mi Pad.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My its higher than yours
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using XDA Free mobile app
rene130313 said:
My its higher than yours
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when I played around I am hitting more the 43.5k
44k with dalvik, 42k with art.
Not sure whether nvidia messed up art or did a good job of optimising dalvik, but it's the first time I've seen it score higher.
Sent from my Xperia Z using Tapatalk
Just remembered when using xposed framework art does not work will have to uninstall and see the difference
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet
Stock Rom, Rooted
How have you got that high?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
fards said:
How have you got that high?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new Antutu v5 has higher scores for gpu.. so its about 10k points higher then antutu v4 benchmarks.
SoLdieR9312 said:
Stock Rom, Rooted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow
Anyone mind testing this app
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2563427
Just want to know how bad it leaves the other devices posted
Unjustified Dev said:
Anyone mind testing this app
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2563427
Just want to know how bad it leaves the other devices posted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance Results
Score:
12,765 points
Screen resolution normalized score:
27,059 points
lowest: 15.10 fps
highest: 183,32 fps
avg: 59,68 fps
btw, this app does not turn the navbar off, so it shows the navigation keys in the benchmark.
SoLdieR9312 said:
Performance Results
Score:
12,765 points
Screen resolution normalized score:
27,059 points
lowest: 15.10 fps
highest: 183,32 fps
avg: 59,68 fps
btw, this app does not turn the navbar off, so it shows the navigation keys in the benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Unjustified Dev said:
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not unlocked and i dont have cwm installed, only rooted via towel-root.
I want to keep the tablet stock.
Unjustified Dev said:
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks will have a look.
MRobbo80 said:
Thanks will have a look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi have tested kernel and works great! I get an extra 1.5k total of 44.5k, normally around 43k give or take this is not version 5. Please stick around we need some great devs!!
Is that kernel going to need an unlocked bootloader?
Can fastboot boot recovery images but I've but tried a kernel yet.
Tempted to start working on some kernels for this device, will see how my time pans out with new job
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
fards said:
Is that kernel going to need an unlocked bootloader?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, i flashed cwm via flashify, then rebooted into cwm and flashed the kernel.
EDIT: AnTuTu v5 56953 Points now, a little higher.