Database Users

Xoom HRI66-from-HRI39 raises Quadrant benchmark 23%

Getting amazing improvement after applying the update. Yes, I repeated this twice to be sure: "No overclock"
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Very impressive. A lot of people have been mentioning snappiness from the update and this backs that up.

I wanna see what this update looks like with OC kernels.

my quadrant and best linpack
Kernal: coolbho3000 v2 1.5GHz
Governer: Interactive
Quadrant: 3072
Linpack: 64.191MFlops

arrtoodeetoo said:
I wanna see what this update looks like with OC kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the 3.0.1 update, have you or anyone else tried the OC (1.5) kernel that everyone's been missing with. I thought I had read over in that thread that there were issues with it now (FC's?). Not sure if I should even bother with flashing it at this point.

lasphyxial said:
my quadrant and best linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is this with the 1.5 ghz OC kernel?

I,m using the oc kernel with 3.0.1, no FCs at all.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

whitedragon33 said:
I,m using the oc kernel with 3.0.1, no FCs at all.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And there was no issue installing it using the exact same files/instructions from before the 3.0.1 update?

I used the apk that jrummy made to install the update for rooted users and it worked like a charm and I still have my overclocked kernel. I didn't have to reinstall the overclocked kernel after the update.
from my Xoom using XDA App

Well I'm not sure what is going on with this kernel. After updating to 3.0.1, then unlocking, then rooting, I went through the procedure for flashing this kernel just as I had done last week. I was able to successfully send the xoom_ocboot.img, then rebooted in fastboot, then remounted, then pushed the bcm4329.ko kernel (verified afterwards by looking with Root Explorer), then rebooted in adb, but the kernel didn't take. The kernel from the 3.0.1 update is still in effect.
What gives??!?!
Maybe I should try the tiamat kernel instead? Whats the difference?
EDIT: I ended up wiping everything and starting from scratch, and this time I modded the OC first, THEN I used the update installer app to update to 3.0.1, which worked perfectly.

despich said:
... and I still have my overclocked kernel. I didn't have to reinstall the overclocked kernel after the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHS; and no issues here.
FWIW, SetCPU shows I'm running 216-1504, but my best LinPack is only ~44.

My original quadrant scores were between 1800-1900. I got the update, and they are still in the same area, no jump to 2100+ like in your attached photo. Was kinda sad cuz I noticed some choppiness while playing Dungeon Defenders and probably could have used that boost to fix it up.
...Then, just to be sure, I restarted it. My scores now match yours. I mean, it already restarted when it updated, but whatever. So if anybody else wants the boost, be sure to do another restart. I rarely restart so it would be a shame for anyone to miss out on a performance boost.

MichaelWestin said:
... Then, just to be sure, I restarted it. My scores now match yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sumbitch. After a restart, my (1.5GHz OCed) device now gets 2454. Before that, it was less than yours.
OP, what do you use to make screenshots? Neither "Shoot Me" nor ... (uh, another one I tried) work. I'm rooted BTW.

kcrudup said:
OP, what do you use to make screenshots? Neither "Shoot Me" nor ... (uh, another one I tried) work. I'm rooted BTW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshots were with the Dalvik Debug Monitor in the SDK Tools.

I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.

Who cares about quadrant, should be using Smartbench 2011 anyway.

quadrant is a terrible benchmarking application.
scores are very inconsistent. if you rerun the application you will get a higher score.
btw, going from 3.0 to 3.01 did not give any improvement in terms of snappiness.

eloist said:
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same. Quadrant has always been this way, however - not everyone gets the same scores.

eloist said:
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must add that my experience is the same. My Xoom has been getting around 1820 regardless of update or reboots.

nubsors said:
Who cares about quadrant, should be using Smartbench 2011 anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just DL'd Smartbench 2011 and ran it. I must say I'm very pleased. All of the stock Xooms running 3.0.1 are getting between 2945-2963. Mine scored a 3329 and is running stock ROM & kernel on 3.0.1. Am quite happy now!

Quadrant Advanced scores!!!!

samsung galaxy s quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz custom rom ext 4 fps uncapped
Total 2014
Cpu. 1691
Mem 1780
I/o. 5359
2d. 359
3d. 1027
samsung galaxy s2 quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz stock rom
Total 3381
Cpu. 7046
Mem 3823
I/o. 3929
2d. 888
3d. 1199
Im getting it! Lol

7000 for CPU?!

screenshot or link would be nice

demo23019 said:
screenshot or link would be nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html

Yeah that's the link. Wait until the devs get a hold of this phone and tweak the I/o speed, uncap the gpu and of the cpu. Imagine the score then. Sanding as redeem themselves from the behold 2 and the gps issues of the original sgs. IT ALSO SCORED A 47 MFLOPS IN LINPACK IN 1.55s. BEASTING.

MikeyMike01 said:
7000 for CPU?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.

KingKuba13 said:
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try comparing GLBenchmark scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

golf2vr6 said:
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rotating planets missing textures , there is not suppose to be pale planets and white background. Also reports of several high profile games not working...
I really wish Samsung used Nvidia tegra or PowerVR SGX , those two companys were in GPU business long time they can write proper GPU drivers , mali is peace of crap.

Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.

Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

rovex said:
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its actually issue with Quadrant. Quadrant advanced and professional editions are stuck at version 1.1.6 which is known to have issues with phones running Gingerbread ROMs like SGS2.
So those scores are flawed.
Standard edition has been upgraded to version 1.1.7 which works without these issues with gingerbread. Ironically those who paid are left in ditch at the moment with lack of update

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
lol quadrant

Makes sense. Its probably why Advanced gives me consistently 5 to 10% lower scores. The textures do seem unstable, sometimes they work, sometimes not.

MaBlo said:
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.

KingKuba13 said:
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wonder if samsung is going to cap the frame rate on the tegra 2 version of the phone?

Incredible CM7 Benchmark Scores (Post here)

I don't know how I got this, I usually only get 4100 and 4200 max but some how I ended up getting 4451! This defiantly competes with the SGS2. Please post any score you have here!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
LOL, and our OC isn't even near as high! 1.1 vs 1.5 ghz!!

SICK! Wow I cant f**king wait!

Chubby_Skunk said:
SICK! Wow I cant f**king wait!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL if we break 1.1... that would be amazing. I wouldn't be surprised to see wayy over 5000!

Do yal not understand how out of date quadrant is? Its results are worthless on any dualcore phone period.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

jug6ernaut said:
Do yal not understand how out of date quadrant is? Its results are worthless on any dualcore phone period.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, yeah I'm pretty sure every one knows that. It's just fun being silly with it

This should be in general, not themes and apps.

Why is that ?... post about a quadrant score , which is an app .
Is there any good benchmark for dual core ?

ofek said:
Why is that ?... post about a quadrant score , which is an app .
Is there any good benchmark for dual core ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's called real lief performance.
If everything works with no lag = epic bench mark
If something lags = crappy software

xploited said:
Yeah, it's called real lief performance.
If everything works with no lag = epic bench mark
If something lags = crappy software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol +0+0+0+0+0+1= +1

Use Chain Fire (CF) Bench... much better for dual core

CaelanT said:
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well this is sort of where this kind of benchmark stuff has always been.

CaelanT said:
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is an App

1. How are you doing a quadrant benchmark? Mine errors out at "decoding video". (10/12)
2. I am working on a 1.2 ghz overclock kernel. So far a lot of bugs, maybe that's why quadrant failed... if I succeed, I will try 1.4... if I can even out the major bugs I will release it.
Also, just want to add that on said kernel I got a 6752 overall in Chainfire...
Kthxbai
Sent from my friend's Atrix

trvstw said:
1. How are you doing a quadrant benchmark? Mine errors out at "decoding video". (10/12)
2. I am working on a 1.2 ghz overclock kernel. So far a lot of bugs, maybe that's why quadrant failed... if I succeed, I will try 1.4... if I can even out the major bugs I will release it.
Also, just want to add that on said kernel I got a 6752 overall in Chainfire...
Kthxbai
Sent from my friend's Atrix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're likely getting an error at "decoding video" because you have used your camera. In order to get quadrant to work properly, you have to run a benchmark before you've opened the camera and caused it to force close.

thegregulator said:
You're likely getting an error at "decoding video" because you have used your camera. In order to get quadrant to work properly, you have to run a benchmark before you've opened the camera and caused it to force close.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
Sent from my friend's Atrix

Smartbench 2011
Awesome Benchmark...
does graphics tests

whats the point hight quadrant or any benchmark if the phone stills laggy and can't play 720p lose the fingerprint captabilities and webtop?!
if you want hight quadrant without webtop and fingerprint buy another phone xD lol
just saying.....please don't interpret me wrong

or, if you want all those features, don't install a pre-beta version of a ROM?
highest quadrant score i've gotten so far is 3400-3500, what are you guys doing with your settings to get so high?

Alcapone263 said:
or, if you want all those features, don't install a pre-beta version of a ROM?
highest quadrant score i've gotten so far is 3400-3500, what are you guys doing with your settings to get so high?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure how many times you've tried the test, but I did it about five times in a row and each time my score raised by about 150 until it steadied at 4200 or so. Make sure to free as much RAM and extra processor usage as possible using a task manager or similar. Also, are you at 1.1Ghz? That's what I'm at with the kernel that came with the CM7 pre-beta install. I believe it is faux's kernel.

vinay427 said:
I'm not sure how many times you've tried the test, but I did it about five times in a row and each time my score raised by about 150 until it steadied at 4200 or so. Make sure to free as much RAM and extra processor usage as possible using a task manager or similar. Also, are you at 1.1Ghz? That's what I'm at with the kernel that came with the CM7 pre-beta install. I believe it is faux's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, and unmount your storage (just plug it into the computer, mass storage)

120% performance increase with Linaro toolchain

I heard the Linaro changes are being pushed, I checked and it looks like it may take a little more time.
basically the Linaro builds use a toolchain that give android builds up to a 30%* performance increase
If any devs want to take a look at it, It's in gerrit (I think this is it)
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/17380/
EDIT: Galaxy Nexus version's reported benchmarks

I read it was only a 30# improvement. I hope it improves the lag on the recents list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

mikeymop said:
I read it was only a 30# improvement. I hope it improves the lag on the recents list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I calculated based on panda-board FPS average results, but you're probably right
EDIT: yep, it was 30, I'm bad at math

Ezekeel believed this was not true, check this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044

bedalus said:
Ezekeel believed this was not true, check this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A Galaxy Nexus ROM has this and they say the UI overall is faster.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/com...ld_optimizations_that_can_make_ics_30/c4y97ef
Could be placebo, who knows.

Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!

bedalus said:
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If this is real, I have a feeling it doesn't respond to benchmarks. As most know, benchmarks are not real world tests.
e.g. deleting an OpenGLes lib to make benchmarks show a different score.

bedalus said:
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already see one person that won't hesitate to benchmark this as soon as it will be available on Nexus S

Wow if this implemented on our phones we will not be needing another core
Sent from my Nexus S®

Oh wait, found this:
http://www.cnx-software.com/2012/06...k-android-to-shame-on-ti-pandaboard-omap4430/
...with the same video.
Looks promising!

Slim ics rom and kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Omg my score is higher than linaro optimized android on gnex!i wonder how much improvement we'll get if slim rom also optimized by linaro..
Sent from my Crespo using xda premium

What program is that your using ? Would love this to come to cm9 based nexus s roms
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

tchaari said:
I already see one person that won't hesitate to benchmark this as soon as it will be available on Nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right! Bedalus will have this sorted soon enough! I'm sure it will be added to the sticky soon after
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

according to Gerrit, CM is having some troubles with compatibility, and they are sorting that out right now.

italia0101 said:
What program is that your using ? Would love this to come to cm9 based nexus s roms
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
koax88 is using 0xbench

koax88 said:
Slim ics rom and kernel
View attachment 1119576
Omg my score is higher than linaro optimized android on gnex!i wonder how much improvement we'll get if slim rom also optimized by linaro..
Sent from my Crespo using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to compare it to a GNEX, not using Nexus S. GNEX has to push more pixels and so on to the 4.65" 720p screen comparing to Nexus S with 4.0" display. I believe that would put a strain on the CPU?

I have question. In which part of an android will this be implemented? The rom or the kernel?
Sent from my Nexus S®

The rom, good sir

mixtapes08 said:
I have question. In which part of an android will this be implemented? The rom or the kernel?
Sent from my Nexus S®
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question. We've already seen that there's no significant benefit from linaro 'optimized' kernel builds. Should be interesting.
....memoirs of a flash addict.

CM9 nightly implemented some Linaro code in the build you can see in change log I did 2 quadrant scores at 1.4ghz & got total score of 1800 I then flashed the Anidroid hardened kernel b.13 which was build using linaro tool chain & got a score of 2500 phone did seem a little quicker but nothing crazy
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

benchmark thread

Hey guys so there is no benchmark thread out there for the Sony xperia z3 compact. Let's post them up. You know antutu, quadrant standard, geekbench etc etc
Happy benchmarking

Here's mine AnTuTu results:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Here

Mine
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app

I noticed my scores were lower than other peoples, I ran them a few times and got around 41k in Antutu and 14k in Quadrant. The phone was not hot, during the first tests the phone was actually cool so it wasn't that and the scores were consistent.
I decided to try the only other thing I could think of and turned the phone off then on, and my scores jumped immediately to around 21k in Quadrant and nearly 45k in Antutu. I don't know why this happened but it is a little worrying performance seems to randomly degrade by a moderate amount after minor use just because it had been on for a while.
Also annoying is the non verified score.

NotOverHere said:
I decided to try the only other thing I could think of and turned the phone off then on, and my scores jumped immediately to around 21k in Quadrant and nearly 45k in Antutu. I don't know why this happened but it is a little worrying performance seems to randomly degrade by a moderate amount after minor use just because it had been on for a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found that my phone's performance degrades for every day i don't restart, the built in task killer just doesn't "kill" many apps properly and after my longest uptime (500+ hours) even phone calls started lagging, due to RAM being filled up with stuff.
But this isn't just for the Z3, i call android ****ty garbage collection much on this one.

Antutu
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

adios1234 said:
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
View attachment 3151374
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That 3D score! Whoa man You using custom rom/kernel?
Sent from my D5833 using XDA Free mobile app

Sadman Khan said:
That 3D score! Whoa man You using custom rom/kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is orginal sony OS, but a little slim.
I removed a lot of useless apps

Androplus and cm12

BeautyRazor said:
Androplus and cm12
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. It's awesome

BeautyRazor said:
Androplus and cm12
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! :good:
Your kernel is working in custom frequency (2,5GHz)?

adios1234 said:
Wow! :good:
Your kernel is working in custom frequency (2,5GHz)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Androplus - 2,95, cm - 2,45

And Geekbench. Only androplus (3,03 Ghz)

ok

Cool)

BeautyRazor said:
Cool)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM12 with cm kernel or custom kernel?
Sent from my D5833 using XDA Free mobile app

Here are my AnTuTu results. Running latest .77 firmware, rooted and unlocked bootloader with AndroPlusKernel. Phone is running in performance mode, through Trickster Mod, for benefit of the benchmark test.

Sadman Khan said:
CM12 with cm kernel or custom kernel?
Sent from my D5833 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm12 with Kernel12 Q1. Gpu oc to 657 only. I wait CPU OS for better results)

Rooted, running kitkat , xposed, using androplus kernel.