Database Users

Nexus One Benchmark results...

Sorry if there's a thread for it, but I haven't seen it. Let's see some benchmark's!
Nexus One:CM5.0.6, Pershoot 042310 OC/UV 1113.6 Kernel
BenchmarkPI - Best of 5
2519
Neocore - Best of 5
27.2
Benchmark - Average of three runs
Graphics:31.89
CPU: 781.35
Memory: 354.58
File System:84.1
Linpak : Search for "lostlocalhost.com" on this page for any of my runs
7.778
I had JIT running long enough and got an 18.992 (was #233 for all devices). Looking forward to when a stable JIT comes out.

Neocore - 1 Run
25.9
Benchmark - 1 Run
Graphics:28.53
CPU: 685
Memory: 341.24
File System:111.47
N1 w/ CyanMod 5.0.5.3.

GNja said:
Sorry if there's a thread for it, but I haven't seen it. Let's see some benchmark's!
Nexus One:CM5.0.6, Pershoot 042310 OC/UV 1113.6 Kernel
BenchmarkPI - Best of 5
2519
Neocore - Best of 5
27.2
Benchmark - Average of three runs
Graphics:31.89
CPU: 781.35
Memory: 354.58
File System:84.1
Linpak : Search for "lostlocalhost.com" on this page for any of my runs
7.778
I had JIT running long enough and got an 18.992 (was #233 for all devices). Looking forward to when a stable JIT comes out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn 2.2 is a hell of an improvement...
Tweaked a bunch of stuff and redid my benchmarks... I could probably squeeze a few more points out of these, but they;re still pretty damn high.
Quadrant:1636
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
BenchmarkPI:818
Linpack:42.963
NeoCore:29.3
Benchmark:
Graphics - 32.233852
CPU - 2743.6726
Memory - 336.75415
File Sys - 117.124115

Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?

RogerPodacter said:
Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus doesn't have the best graphic card, i think this will go to the droid.

Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a stress rendering test. On some pc benchmark tests even the best pc.s produce 1-10 FPS

Linpack: 40.398 (0.13 seconds)
Benchmark Pi : 954 milliseconds
Neocore : 29.0
Quadrant : 1630
Build: FRF50 stock
Kernel : Linux msm 2.6.32.2 android.git source; UV, +21MB RAM
Speed : Stock, 998.4 MHz
Hint: To get better result.
Using SetCPU, set min cpu speed to maximum, and set cpufreq governor to performance.
NOTE: No process or task being killed or harmed during the benchmarking
TQ

my neocore benchmark was 29.3 and the second test was 29.1
my buddies mt Slide had 29.7 and 29.3..yikes lol.
I have herd that the Slide had the best GPU of any android phone in the US as of now. Its so weird.

Quadrant Advanced scores!!!!

samsung galaxy s quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz custom rom ext 4 fps uncapped
Total 2014
Cpu. 1691
Mem 1780
I/o. 5359
2d. 359
3d. 1027
samsung galaxy s2 quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz stock rom
Total 3381
Cpu. 7046
Mem 3823
I/o. 3929
2d. 888
3d. 1199
Im getting it! Lol

7000 for CPU?!

screenshot or link would be nice

demo23019 said:
screenshot or link would be nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html

Yeah that's the link. Wait until the devs get a hold of this phone and tweak the I/o speed, uncap the gpu and of the cpu. Imagine the score then. Sanding as redeem themselves from the behold 2 and the gps issues of the original sgs. IT ALSO SCORED A 47 MFLOPS IN LINPACK IN 1.55s. BEASTING.

MikeyMike01 said:
7000 for CPU?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.

KingKuba13 said:
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try comparing GLBenchmark scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

golf2vr6 said:
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rotating planets missing textures , there is not suppose to be pale planets and white background. Also reports of several high profile games not working...
I really wish Samsung used Nvidia tegra or PowerVR SGX , those two companys were in GPU business long time they can write proper GPU drivers , mali is peace of crap.

Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.

Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

rovex said:
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its actually issue with Quadrant. Quadrant advanced and professional editions are stuck at version 1.1.6 which is known to have issues with phones running Gingerbread ROMs like SGS2.
So those scores are flawed.
Standard edition has been upgraded to version 1.1.7 which works without these issues with gingerbread. Ironically those who paid are left in ditch at the moment with lack of update

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
lol quadrant

Makes sense. Its probably why Advanced gives me consistently 5 to 10% lower scores. The textures do seem unstable, sometimes they work, sometimes not.

MaBlo said:
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.

KingKuba13 said:
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wonder if samsung is going to cap the frame rate on the tegra 2 version of the phone?

GB Quadrant Scores

Whats quadrant scores are you getting with your 2.3.3 rom?
Quadrant Score: 1030
Rom: WB-XPERIA TW Gingerbread Hotfix 3
That was with Quadrant Standard.
[Edit] Please state if you're using Quadrant Advanced or Quadrant Standard.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1228
(first run, didn't bother to run the tests twice)
Stock pre-rooted ROM, I haven't removed anything, no tweaks applied apart from fixed xRecovery and Bravia Engine by Z.
No lag, no bugs, awesome camera... Life is good again!
Xperia X10i via Tapatalk

here's mine all stock GB

Think my highest was 1330 or something like that.
That is on Doom's prerooted ROM, with a few apps removed, and Z's FPS uncap.

1k 1st run
1.1k 2nd run

1467, second run.
Stock 2.3.3 with SPB Shell.

Around 1200 in first run and 1430 in 2nd !!

1st run 930, 2nd run 1109, 3rd run 1030.
How are you guys getting 1400+?
I'm using the prerooted ROM, but thats it.

Here's my best using Ewjet ginger rom.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=16136301&postcount=65

1st run 1300+ 2nd 1492
The GB update has tweak the I/O from 500-600 on 2.2roms to 700+ in GB

1st run 990
2nd run 1230
With basically everything I need installed.
Seems about right. I always got a bit lower scores than the rest of you whichever ROM I used. I'm guessing it's component imperfections

I always get higher score in Quadrant Advanced(1.1.6 and below) than in Quadrant Standard. I have got 1800+ in Quadrant Advanced using MIUI 1.7.22 with DooMLorD's kernel. Better use Quadrant from Market to report the scorers ?
In Wolf's 2.3:
Quadrant Advanced : 1450
Quadrant Standard : 1121

1020-1040 for 4 times of trying, never get below 1k but also never get above 1.1k.....using WB TW GB 2.3.3

1004 first run
1176 second run
Quadrant Standard

1450 first run.

Using WB 2.3, I got ~950 the first run. By the 4th run, I got 1304. Linpack is between 36-37.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

3rd run 1307 !! Didn't see that coming

Highest I got is 1377..
with some tweaks from Z, and 2.1 teaks (im pretty sure it doesnt work, but i added it anyways lol)

quadrant stnd - 1683 with some of my tweaks, but i go back to my miui, on this backstab lags like hell , after my tweaks , it doesnt , on my miui all games without lags. I tried asphalt 6 is so laggy on stock 2.3.3 after my tweaks not on mtt miui to. The stock 2.3.3 is good but after very good tuning, but customs will better than 4 ever, maybe, . On miui i have a lot of more points in quadrant, but for me these all quadrant score testers are one **** of falses. I use them only for checking how many fps i have on my kernel, nothing more.
Send from my own MIUI Final by Oskar.K X10

Always between 1430 and 1480 on 2nd run (WB 2.3.3). Quadrant advanced.

Share your benchmark score! (any application test you want)

I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5

theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?

Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.

Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz

CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)

Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?

Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)

vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?

Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart

Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points

For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.

vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?

k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.

Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!

@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point

What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.

Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Post your Quadrant scores...

Hey guys, now that HTC Desire has matured with so many ROMs and kernels blazing, I thought about why not share your HTC Desire Quadrant scores.. This will also be a comparison of ROMs and kernels. I would like to know the tweaks in your Deisre too with your quadrant scores... And please, don't post any other phone's score. That would be unfair. And use the full benchmark, not a custom one Give the screenshots, not the scores. Cheers!

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

HTC Desire benchmark
As far as I remember, this is benchmark for VJ's v5 something:
And this was made this morning with v6.1:

Doesn't look like Quadrant to me...

ntn_labs said:
As far as I remember, this is benchmark for VJ's v5 something:
And this was made this morning with v6.1:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please I said the Quadrant ones........

Ok, so here is mine.
SETUP:
ROM: CM7.2
KERNEL: Tiamat
SDCARD: Class 4, Kingston 16 GB, no ext partition

Cyanomod007 V10 (CM10.1, JellyBean 4.2.2):
CPU: Interactive, 1113MHz
Kernel: [email protected] #1
SD: emtec class 10, sdext:1.5GB
wiped cache/dalvik before test

nonline said:
Cyanomod007 V10 (CM10.1, JellyBean 4.2.2):
CPU: Interactive, 1113MHz
Kernel: [email protected] #1
SD: emtec class 10, sdext:1.5GB
wiped cache/dalvik before test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What I/O scheduler????

alicarbovader said:
What I/O scheduler????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

alicarbovader said:
Please I said the Quadrant ones........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, gonna do quadrant asap...

The Quadrant scores...
Okay, so VJ's v5 something:
And this should be VJ's 6.2:

noop scheduler @1075 ondemand but with class10 SD card
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app

Balino said:
noop scheduler @1075 ondemand but with class10 SD card
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to see an above 3000 score on the I/O. Would love to borrow your SD Card and benchmark mine

VJ CM 10.1 v.6.3 JB 4.2.2
CPU: 384-1075mHz ondemand
I/O: Deadline
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app

alicarbovader said:
Good to see an above 3000 score on the I/O. Would love to borrow your SD Card and benchmark mine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using a special Sony micro sd quite fast!!!
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app

On this rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2213033 v24 i've got 2100 points. SD Card Class 10 UHS-I

japkooo said:
On this rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2213033 v24 i've got 2100 points. SD Card Class 10 UHS-I
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, we believe you, but quadrant scores please...

SpazeDog-ICS-0.9.0U1

why that low score?
galaxy ace ~1569 (which is budget phone, teoritically with lower specs)
and htc desire got only ~1700 ?

Screen resolution makes big difference on 2d and especially 3d performance, desire has 480 x 800 screen against 320 x 480 in ace, that's more than twice as many pixels to power for the same gpu. 200 mhz and a bit more ram can not possibly compensate for that.
This is probably the highest possible result for the desire, without cheating and within safe overclock range.
Qiss me ics 4.0.4 ROM @ 1113mhz