Database Users

Nexus One Benchmark results...

Sorry if there's a thread for it, but I haven't seen it. Let's see some benchmark's!
Nexus One:CM5.0.6, Pershoot 042310 OC/UV 1113.6 Kernel
BenchmarkPI - Best of 5
2519
Neocore - Best of 5
27.2
Benchmark - Average of three runs
Graphics:31.89
CPU: 781.35
Memory: 354.58
File System:84.1
Linpak : Search for "lostlocalhost.com" on this page for any of my runs
7.778
I had JIT running long enough and got an 18.992 (was #233 for all devices). Looking forward to when a stable JIT comes out.

Neocore - 1 Run
25.9
Benchmark - 1 Run
Graphics:28.53
CPU: 685
Memory: 341.24
File System:111.47
N1 w/ CyanMod 5.0.5.3.

GNja said:
Sorry if there's a thread for it, but I haven't seen it. Let's see some benchmark's!
Nexus One:CM5.0.6, Pershoot 042310 OC/UV 1113.6 Kernel
BenchmarkPI - Best of 5
2519
Neocore - Best of 5
27.2
Benchmark - Average of three runs
Graphics:31.89
CPU: 781.35
Memory: 354.58
File System:84.1
Linpak : Search for "lostlocalhost.com" on this page for any of my runs
7.778
I had JIT running long enough and got an 18.992 (was #233 for all devices). Looking forward to when a stable JIT comes out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn 2.2 is a hell of an improvement...
Tweaked a bunch of stuff and redid my benchmarks... I could probably squeeze a few more points out of these, but they;re still pretty damn high.
Quadrant:1636
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
BenchmarkPI:818
Linpack:42.963
NeoCore:29.3
Benchmark:
Graphics - 32.233852
CPU - 2743.6726
Memory - 336.75415
File Sys - 117.124115

Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?

RogerPodacter said:
Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus doesn't have the best graphic card, i think this will go to the droid.

Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a stress rendering test. On some pc benchmark tests even the best pc.s produce 1-10 FPS

Linpack: 40.398 (0.13 seconds)
Benchmark Pi : 954 milliseconds
Neocore : 29.0
Quadrant : 1630
Build: FRF50 stock
Kernel : Linux msm 2.6.32.2 android.git source; UV, +21MB RAM
Speed : Stock, 998.4 MHz
Hint: To get better result.
Using SetCPU, set min cpu speed to maximum, and set cpufreq governor to performance.
NOTE: No process or task being killed or harmed during the benchmarking
TQ

my neocore benchmark was 29.3 and the second test was 29.1
my buddies mt Slide had 29.7 and 29.3..yikes lol.
I have herd that the Slide had the best GPU of any android phone in the US as of now. Its so weird.

Best Quadrant Score?

Hey guys I was just wondering what's your best Quadrant score you've had on your HD2? I got what I think is a fairly high quadrant score today and I was fairly impressed.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

i think 2300 or 2700 somewhere in between

I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.

You beat my score!

johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not totally irrelevant, but sometimes close to it. Quadrant standard is useless, pro is a little better.
The problem with Quadrant is:
1) Disk IO test, if you try some of the builds with very high score you'll see it's coming from IO, you can just mount that one part that Quadrant use in RAM, get crazy high score, but that won't speed up any other apps/system as you still use your NAND/SD card
2) Video speed, as on early Darkstone builds video score was very low as that build had something turned off (because with it's ON there were other bugs), but all apps were using some other API for video, so only Quadrant was slow on it
3) Quadrant tests doesn't show real system performance, so higher score might have no increase in speed in other apps. For example you can put newest CPU on your PC, but having only 256mb RAM would make everything slow, no matter how fast your CPU is, but CPU score would be higher
This doesn't mean that Quadrant is bad, in my opinion if you're using pro version and you get some component score (for example CPU score) higher on one build then on other - that's good. If you get total score higher, build might be actually slower then other build with low score.

this is the old 1.32... at 1200mhz cedes sd build.
with the new 1.72... dhd base i get max 5000 cpu points and approx 5000 I/O points with data on ext4 partition. that makes 2400 overall quadrant points. at 998 mhz. but if i put all data to nand the I/O points are 1250, but the device feels faster and boots faster. for now i only put app folder on the ext4 partition, dalvik and data remain on internal memory. i am still testing whats the best combo, it takes lot of time

johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your right there.
I don't use Quadrant much but i got over 3000 before (using Darkstones SUPERAM)

Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Skellyyy said:
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?

SuperNAND got about 4000.
Proof:
Someone beat this . Quadrant scores are garbage, it proves nothing.

jonny68 said:
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm on my phone right now I can't get the link but its the DHD build by Andrew something. Should be on the first page in the NAND forum.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

[Q] Vellamo benchmarking ROM comparison on SGS2

With the release of Vellamo I thought it would be worth bench marking some of the SGS2 ROMS available. Post below for comparisons (use menu -> last numbers for detailed breakdown)
Search Vellamo on the marketplace. (unable to post links yet)
ROM: Stock I9100XWKF1 [2.3.3]
Total Score = 950
See The Sun Canvas base score = 86.27
Deep Sea Canvas base score = 123.35
Aquarium Canvas base score = 92.18
Pixel Blender base score = 94.16
Surf Wax Binder base score = 52.14
Sun Spider base score = 92.29
V8 Benchmark base score 84.75
Ocean Flinger Base score = 90.52
Image Flinger base score = 35.22
Text Flinger base score = 50.02
Network loader base score = 152.82

Mine. 941.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The Sensation people are pissed because they're only getting 7-800ish and its a Qualcomm benchmark. Check out the Atrix. Eww.

The first test I ran I got 940-ish.
Then I rebootes the device, overclocked to 1.4 GHz and...
Score: 1047! Even above the Galaxy Tab! SGS2 FTW

Mine was at stock clock. I really don't feel any need to overclock this device.

XDA mark said:
The first test I ran I got 940-ish.
Then I rebootes the device, overclocked to 1.4 GHz and...
Score: 1047! Even above the Galaxy Tab! SGS2 FTW
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you on?

I got a lowly 904 on mine...sniff sniff

I suppose the benchmark is not affected by the deodexed browser lag, because I got 920 on darky's KG1 (with browser fix which disables acceleration).

Done a reboot and ran again and got a better score of 933
Running stock UK KF3 firmware

1065 for me using Lite 2.2 tweaked to 1300.
But remember guys..... These are only numbers and usability depends on the user.
D
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App

BarryH_GEG said:
Mine. 941.
Y
The Sensation people are pissed because they're only getting 7-800ish and its a Qualcomm benchmark. Check out the Atrix. Eww.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah check out the Atrix, it has GB.....oh wait.
Shows the credibility of this benchmark.
This is probably one of the worst ones to come out in a long time.
Inaccurate and useless.

my score is : 913.

KingKuba13 said:
Yeah check out the Atrix, it has GB.....oh wait.
Shows the credibility of this benchmark.
This is probably one of the worst ones to come out in a long time.
Inaccurate and useless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://briefmobile.com/download-android-2-3-4-gingerbread-for-motorola-atrix-4g

Test
Using Lite`ning rom v2.2 kernel xxkg1, android 2.3.4
Total score: 914

awjunk said:
What ROM are you on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock.. I only rooted. I used Tegrak app to overclock to 1.4 GHz

i am on 1167, faster than the TAB.
I am on Cognition 1.31, ninphetamine 2.0.5+
using JD to OC up to 1.6 ondemand.
Quadrant score = 3850.
Abandond Lite'ning at 4.0 for Cognition 1.31 while waiting for stable CM7

Benchmarks results

Hi guys, I have an arc S from a few weeks, after several tests I found a rom that flies in quadrant, these are the results:
4030 pts without overclocking
4739 pts with overclocking @ 2000 (v15 doom-Kernel)
All the other roms, including Cyanogen v 7.2, have a maximum in 2200-2500 pts.
The rom is SE-tweaked.
How can this difference in performance?

i bet that the guy that made that rom included the quadrant hack, nothin special imo.

probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.

johnbarleycorn said:
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try antutu benchmark and nenamark 2.

antutu 3500-3600 pts
nenamark2 14.8.
The quandrant booster apk not change the results.

With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

Flo95 said:
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@1.4 without Supercharger V6.

Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

Flo95 said:
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got 3924 @ 1.6 GHz smartassV2 on my Arc S.

Nice, what ROM do you use?
Even if Benchmarks say nothing about real use, it's nice to compare
Yesterday I made one test @ 1.8GHz and scored 4285 points
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

Look in the signature, same ROM you're using.
I'll try 1,8 GHz too, but 2 GHz not any more, seems like my CPU can't handle it.
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium

Nice, sorry. Tapatalk doesn't display signature so I can't see them.
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?

arneh1992 said:
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's totally normal to have that score.
The guy just used the quadrant hack, if you run different benchmarks (e.g. AnTuTu, Vellamo, etc.) you'll notice that your device is nearly the same to other results.

Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...

arneh1992 said:
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is maximum?
Quadrant scores between 1800 and 2400 are normal imo.

I mean like, cause i use arconium, doomkernel and supercharger i thought it would be faster... But getting scores around the 2000 is the maximum for me, or can i get it higher( without overclocking more )? I wanna play a lot of games with minimum lag

Quadrant scores say nothing!
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk

Well i dont really know why but my Arc with doomkernel v15 @1.6GHz hit the score of 3982 at Antutu benchmark.. Maybe is the sd booster i use..
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App

My V6 custom ROM - NOT released V6 yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

FPS capped at 59 with every kernel or tweak

I have a problem,my nexus 7 (as the title suggests) will not pass 59 fps. I've tried various roms,kernels and tweaks.
I'm not New to android and my sensation gets 70+ fps benchmarking, anyone know of any reason for my woes?
Getting really annoying to be honest. My sensation is ranked #1 in its device section of antutu and I want to push the nexus just as far

bonesy said:
I have a problem,my nexus 7 (as the title suggests) will not pass 59 fps. I've tried various roms,kernels and tweaks.
I'm not New to android and my sensation gets 70+ fps benchmarking, anyone know of any reason for my woes?
Getting really annoying to be honest. My sensation is ranked #1 in its device section of antutu and I want to push the nexus just as far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats how it is, 59fps is the limit. kernel developers can raise the panel frequency, which can raise the fps to 109. but its not real, so they stopped doing that. what was your highest antutu, i bet i beat it with my n7. anyways, your 59fps on your n7 is is better than what you get on your sensation, you failed to take in account screen size, more pixels to push.

Thanks for the reply, i get 8229 with my sensation clocked at 1836mhz and with my N7 clocked at 1800mhz i get 9815 on antutu. Seems a bit naff to be quite frank, my dual core phone can nearly bench the same as the Tegra quad. I found some kernels with the fps limit disabled and i still only get 59 fps

bonesy said:
Thanks for the reply, i get 8229 with my sensation clocked at 1836mhz and with my N7 clocked at 1800mhz i get 9815 on antutu. Seems a bit naff to be quite frank, my dual core phone can nearly bench the same as the Tegra quad. I found some kernels with the fps limit disabled and i still only get 59 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 12000-16000 on antutu depending which kernel im using(and cpu speed), at 59fps. but its the screen size really that is the difference. and antutu isnt a good benchmark for graphic performance. its outdated and the test itself limits the scores.
here, nearly twice your sensation.. id say youre using the wrong rom/kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Thats more like what i expect the score to be like! Just to check without starting a thread.... Is the latest bootloader 3.34?
To be fair i am severely disappointed with this device, never had any problems with any if the HTC devices and within 3 days of owning this the micro usb cable has fallen apart, the screen has lifted in one corner and is displaying stress marks on the LCD trying to contact google or asus is becoming a stressful task.
What ROM is eveyone using? I'm guessing cyanogenmod??

I just run stock. It doesn't matter what rom/kernel I wind up running, it never seems to be as stable in the long term as the stock setup. Since I have bought my N7 I have flashed a ton of roms to it, when heading back to stock for a while out of boredom I found that I have an up time of well over a month now. I never got that lucky with custom roms after a week or two I always had to reboot it because of random issues including lagging and slow performance, to apps misbehaving.