Database Users

Best Quadrant Score?

Hey guys I was just wondering what's your best Quadrant score you've had on your HD2? I got what I think is a fairly high quadrant score today and I was fairly impressed.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

i think 2300 or 2700 somewhere in between

I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.

You beat my score!

johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not totally irrelevant, but sometimes close to it. Quadrant standard is useless, pro is a little better.
The problem with Quadrant is:
1) Disk IO test, if you try some of the builds with very high score you'll see it's coming from IO, you can just mount that one part that Quadrant use in RAM, get crazy high score, but that won't speed up any other apps/system as you still use your NAND/SD card
2) Video speed, as on early Darkstone builds video score was very low as that build had something turned off (because with it's ON there were other bugs), but all apps were using some other API for video, so only Quadrant was slow on it
3) Quadrant tests doesn't show real system performance, so higher score might have no increase in speed in other apps. For example you can put newest CPU on your PC, but having only 256mb RAM would make everything slow, no matter how fast your CPU is, but CPU score would be higher
This doesn't mean that Quadrant is bad, in my opinion if you're using pro version and you get some component score (for example CPU score) higher on one build then on other - that's good. If you get total score higher, build might be actually slower then other build with low score.

this is the old 1.32... at 1200mhz cedes sd build.
with the new 1.72... dhd base i get max 5000 cpu points and approx 5000 I/O points with data on ext4 partition. that makes 2400 overall quadrant points. at 998 mhz. but if i put all data to nand the I/O points are 1250, but the device feels faster and boots faster. for now i only put app folder on the ext4 partition, dalvik and data remain on internal memory. i am still testing whats the best combo, it takes lot of time

johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your right there.
I don't use Quadrant much but i got over 3000 before (using Darkstones SUPERAM)

Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Skellyyy said:
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?

SuperNAND got about 4000.
Proof:
Someone beat this . Quadrant scores are garbage, it proves nothing.

jonny68 said:
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm on my phone right now I can't get the link but its the DHD build by Andrew something. Should be on the first page in the NAND forum.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

[Q] Vellamo benchmarking ROM comparison on SGS2

With the release of Vellamo I thought it would be worth bench marking some of the SGS2 ROMS available. Post below for comparisons (use menu -> last numbers for detailed breakdown)
Search Vellamo on the marketplace. (unable to post links yet)
ROM: Stock I9100XWKF1 [2.3.3]
Total Score = 950
See The Sun Canvas base score = 86.27
Deep Sea Canvas base score = 123.35
Aquarium Canvas base score = 92.18
Pixel Blender base score = 94.16
Surf Wax Binder base score = 52.14
Sun Spider base score = 92.29
V8 Benchmark base score 84.75
Ocean Flinger Base score = 90.52
Image Flinger base score = 35.22
Text Flinger base score = 50.02
Network loader base score = 152.82

Mine. 941.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The Sensation people are pissed because they're only getting 7-800ish and its a Qualcomm benchmark. Check out the Atrix. Eww.

The first test I ran I got 940-ish.
Then I rebootes the device, overclocked to 1.4 GHz and...
Score: 1047! Even above the Galaxy Tab! SGS2 FTW

Mine was at stock clock. I really don't feel any need to overclock this device.

XDA mark said:
The first test I ran I got 940-ish.
Then I rebootes the device, overclocked to 1.4 GHz and...
Score: 1047! Even above the Galaxy Tab! SGS2 FTW
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you on?

I got a lowly 904 on mine...sniff sniff

I suppose the benchmark is not affected by the deodexed browser lag, because I got 920 on darky's KG1 (with browser fix which disables acceleration).

Done a reboot and ran again and got a better score of 933
Running stock UK KF3 firmware

1065 for me using Lite 2.2 tweaked to 1300.
But remember guys..... These are only numbers and usability depends on the user.
D
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App

BarryH_GEG said:
Mine. 941.
Y
The Sensation people are pissed because they're only getting 7-800ish and its a Qualcomm benchmark. Check out the Atrix. Eww.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah check out the Atrix, it has GB.....oh wait.
Shows the credibility of this benchmark.
This is probably one of the worst ones to come out in a long time.
Inaccurate and useless.

my score is : 913.

KingKuba13 said:
Yeah check out the Atrix, it has GB.....oh wait.
Shows the credibility of this benchmark.
This is probably one of the worst ones to come out in a long time.
Inaccurate and useless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://briefmobile.com/download-android-2-3-4-gingerbread-for-motorola-atrix-4g

Test
Using Lite`ning rom v2.2 kernel xxkg1, android 2.3.4
Total score: 914

awjunk said:
What ROM are you on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock.. I only rooted. I used Tegrak app to overclock to 1.4 GHz

i am on 1167, faster than the TAB.
I am on Cognition 1.31, ninphetamine 2.0.5+
using JD to OC up to 1.6 ondemand.
Quadrant score = 3850.
Abandond Lite'ning at 4.0 for Cognition 1.31 while waiting for stable CM7

GB Quadrant Scores

Whats quadrant scores are you getting with your 2.3.3 rom?
Quadrant Score: 1030
Rom: WB-XPERIA TW Gingerbread Hotfix 3
That was with Quadrant Standard.
[Edit] Please state if you're using Quadrant Advanced or Quadrant Standard.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1228
(first run, didn't bother to run the tests twice)
Stock pre-rooted ROM, I haven't removed anything, no tweaks applied apart from fixed xRecovery and Bravia Engine by Z.
No lag, no bugs, awesome camera... Life is good again!
Xperia X10i via Tapatalk

here's mine all stock GB

Think my highest was 1330 or something like that.
That is on Doom's prerooted ROM, with a few apps removed, and Z's FPS uncap.

1k 1st run
1.1k 2nd run

1467, second run.
Stock 2.3.3 with SPB Shell.

Around 1200 in first run and 1430 in 2nd !!

1st run 930, 2nd run 1109, 3rd run 1030.
How are you guys getting 1400+?
I'm using the prerooted ROM, but thats it.

Here's my best using Ewjet ginger rom.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=16136301&postcount=65

1st run 1300+ 2nd 1492
The GB update has tweak the I/O from 500-600 on 2.2roms to 700+ in GB

1st run 990
2nd run 1230
With basically everything I need installed.
Seems about right. I always got a bit lower scores than the rest of you whichever ROM I used. I'm guessing it's component imperfections

I always get higher score in Quadrant Advanced(1.1.6 and below) than in Quadrant Standard. I have got 1800+ in Quadrant Advanced using MIUI 1.7.22 with DooMLorD's kernel. Better use Quadrant from Market to report the scorers ?
In Wolf's 2.3:
Quadrant Advanced : 1450
Quadrant Standard : 1121

1020-1040 for 4 times of trying, never get below 1k but also never get above 1.1k.....using WB TW GB 2.3.3

1004 first run
1176 second run
Quadrant Standard

1450 first run.

Using WB 2.3, I got ~950 the first run. By the 4th run, I got 1304. Linpack is between 36-37.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

3rd run 1307 !! Didn't see that coming

Highest I got is 1377..
with some tweaks from Z, and 2.1 teaks (im pretty sure it doesnt work, but i added it anyways lol)

quadrant stnd - 1683 with some of my tweaks, but i go back to my miui, on this backstab lags like hell , after my tweaks , it doesnt , on my miui all games without lags. I tried asphalt 6 is so laggy on stock 2.3.3 after my tweaks not on mtt miui to. The stock 2.3.3 is good but after very good tuning, but customs will better than 4 ever, maybe, . On miui i have a lot of more points in quadrant, but for me these all quadrant score testers are one **** of falses. I use them only for checking how many fps i have on my kernel, nothing more.
Send from my own MIUI Final by Oskar.K X10

Always between 1430 and 1480 on 2nd run (WB 2.3.3). Quadrant advanced.

Share your benchmark score! (any application test you want)

I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5

theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?

Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.

Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz

CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)

Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?

Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)

vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?

Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart

Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points

For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.

vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?

k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.

Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!

@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point

What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.

Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

FPS capped at 59 with every kernel or tweak

I have a problem,my nexus 7 (as the title suggests) will not pass 59 fps. I've tried various roms,kernels and tweaks.
I'm not New to android and my sensation gets 70+ fps benchmarking, anyone know of any reason for my woes?
Getting really annoying to be honest. My sensation is ranked #1 in its device section of antutu and I want to push the nexus just as far

bonesy said:
I have a problem,my nexus 7 (as the title suggests) will not pass 59 fps. I've tried various roms,kernels and tweaks.
I'm not New to android and my sensation gets 70+ fps benchmarking, anyone know of any reason for my woes?
Getting really annoying to be honest. My sensation is ranked #1 in its device section of antutu and I want to push the nexus just as far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats how it is, 59fps is the limit. kernel developers can raise the panel frequency, which can raise the fps to 109. but its not real, so they stopped doing that. what was your highest antutu, i bet i beat it with my n7. anyways, your 59fps on your n7 is is better than what you get on your sensation, you failed to take in account screen size, more pixels to push.

Thanks for the reply, i get 8229 with my sensation clocked at 1836mhz and with my N7 clocked at 1800mhz i get 9815 on antutu. Seems a bit naff to be quite frank, my dual core phone can nearly bench the same as the Tegra quad. I found some kernels with the fps limit disabled and i still only get 59 fps

bonesy said:
Thanks for the reply, i get 8229 with my sensation clocked at 1836mhz and with my N7 clocked at 1800mhz i get 9815 on antutu. Seems a bit naff to be quite frank, my dual core phone can nearly bench the same as the Tegra quad. I found some kernels with the fps limit disabled and i still only get 59 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 12000-16000 on antutu depending which kernel im using(and cpu speed), at 59fps. but its the screen size really that is the difference. and antutu isnt a good benchmark for graphic performance. its outdated and the test itself limits the scores.
here, nearly twice your sensation.. id say youre using the wrong rom/kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Thats more like what i expect the score to be like! Just to check without starting a thread.... Is the latest bootloader 3.34?
To be fair i am severely disappointed with this device, never had any problems with any if the HTC devices and within 3 days of owning this the micro usb cable has fallen apart, the screen has lifted in one corner and is displaying stress marks on the LCD trying to contact google or asus is becoming a stressful task.
What ROM is eveyone using? I'm guessing cyanogenmod??

I just run stock. It doesn't matter what rom/kernel I wind up running, it never seems to be as stable in the long term as the stock setup. Since I have bought my N7 I have flashed a ton of roms to it, when heading back to stock for a while out of boredom I found that I have an up time of well over a month now. I never got that lucky with custom roms after a week or two I always had to reboot it because of random issues including lagging and slow performance, to apps misbehaving.