Database Users

Evo Quadrant Scores?

Hey guys, post your quadrant scores here please.
I have an Evo with hardware version 003 and my quadrant score is 1212 with the 3.70.651.1 update. (Android 2.2) I'm running stock btw.

Mine's about 1400 and I'm running CM6 with the built in kernel... But I was using Myn's and Fresh over the last week and I didn't get over 1100 with either one of them... But I really couldn't tell a difference in speed, just a different number
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

Just got 1502 using cm7 with savaged zen v005 cfs
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

http://twitpic.com/3v1yf3
not even using snap heh

stiffspliff said:
http://twitpic.com/3v1yf3
not even using snap heh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh miui, you slay me

I get about 1100-1200 depending if my clocks are stock or oced

Time for everyone to retake their tests. New quadrant = alot lower scores... :/
My old scores were:
miui: 1700
savage gb: 1500

i get max ~13xx by using ROm myn's warm twopointtwo RLS 5 and kernel netarchy 4.3.2

I get just over 1000. Check my sig for my rig!

stiffspliff said:
http://twitpic.com/3v1yf3
not even using snap heh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post a link to the ROM that you're using?

speedy0339 said:
Can you post a link to the ROM that you're using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would be happy to.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=915527
(he is one of the devs for miui)

Overclocking

Has any one been able to Overclock Gt-I9100 to more than 1.6Ghz?..
IF YES.. please can u tell me how to do it..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

I'd be interested to hear how this affects battery life.

Overclocking is kernel dependant so look at the limitations on the different custom kernels.
Max i have seen is 1696mhz on Siyah Kernel.

Bartapuce said:
Overclocking is kernel dependant so look at the limitations on the different custom kernels.
Max i have seen is 1696mhz on Siyah Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know that its kernel dependant.. and ..Yea i have seen dat too.. but i have Siyah Kernel and i only can OC upto 1600mhz.. So any thing i can do to Increase my processor performance..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

mehtaparth said:
. So any thing i can do to Increase my processor performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, buy a core i7 desktop and use it for processor intensive tasks. 1.2 ghz is already fast and 1.65 is simply blazing for a mobile.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

mehtaparth said:
I know that its kernel dependant.. and ..Yea i have seen dat too.. but i have Siyah Kernel and i only can OC upto 1600mhz.. So any thing i can do to Increase my processor performance..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You will be able to change the 1600mhz "Max Freq" in "freq_table" only by script.
For more info see Siyah thread (ie: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19206493&highlight=1696#post19206493 )
And as always in overclocking "at your own risk".
You can also ask for help in the Siyah Q&A thread :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1325831

Bartapuce said:
You will be able to change the 1600mhz "Max Freq" in "freq_table" only by script.
For more info see Siyah thread (ie: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19206493&highlight=1696#post19206493 )
And as always in overclocking "at your own risk".
You can also ask for help in the Siyah Q&A thread :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1325831
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohk.. thnks..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

[Q] Blade benchmark scores

Hi guys,
Anyone care to share what sort of quadrant and linpack scores they are getting from their blade?
I'm running CM7.1.0 installed via the gen1 to gen2 tpt method.
My quadrant score is 960 and linpack (single thread) is around 9 mflops.
Pretty good score on quadrant for a budget device imo, probably because the graphics are quite good, linpack score exposes the slower cpu though.
Anyone beat those scores?

Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.

1445 points in quadrant standard... see attached screenie-

n3tk0 said:
Yep, without any changes, 990
With some overclock 1100 points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you using?!I only get around 850 no OC in quadrant..

Quadrant Benchmark sucks, use ANTUTU, for a proper Benchmark score. And please mention what roms you are using and what frequency is your processor running at.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium

Even ANTUTU does not give accurate benchmark scores, no mobile benchmark really does. for example users have reported scoring around 200 points for 2D graphics on the galaxy nexus, whereas my ZTE blade scores about 300.

ANTUTU is still more accurate than quadrant.
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using xda premium

1770 on AnTuTu with newest CM7 Burtslam´s build

Sej last build + wbaw last kernel
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!

Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

karthiknr said:
Burstlam's KANG at 748Mhz.
View attachment 922142
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!

Gokh said:
At the same freq, you get better graphics Oo, you have burstlam kernel?
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. His build and kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

This is from today evening. Wbaw's KANG and Kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!

Gokh said:
It's interesting, the only value which change is the 2d/3d graphics
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

karthiknr said:
Yes. Wbaw has overclocked the GPU in his kernel.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.

wbaw said:
It doesn't seem to affect the Antutu scores for some reason, I don't know why. You can see it in the UI & 3D games though. Those graphics scores vary on every run anyway & they're worthless, Antutu thinks we have better 2D graphics than the Galaxy Nexus.
The database IO score was a bit higher in mine, I think thats because of the ondemand updates & io_is_busy setting.
My kernel is based on Burstlam's so it's not surprising the scores are similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. But still the scores seem to be pretty high. Maybe because of the overclock. And like you said there is lot of visual improvement in games which Antutu may not calculate accurately.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app

New Quadrant 2.0 Bench: Post your scores

I do know that benchmarks sometimes say something, sometimes not. But I also know that many of you are interested in scores, and because a new major version of the grandmother of benchmarks, quadrant, has just been released...
My score is based on stock LA6 and Abysnote 3.6 (lulzactive, max. 1,6GHz)!
So, have fun comparing...

3898 stock rom
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

4100 with checkrom v5 + cf kernel
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Darky 3.3
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

A woping 4018 on stock la4
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Hey this is my score abyssnote 3.7 with darkyrom LA6 stock 1.4GHZ
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

I m not one to put any trust in benchmarks but im bired so here goes
Cassie xtralite v8 with franco kernel
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

What on earth i can barely get above 3000. Fresh reboot on darky 3.3 franco kernel gives 2800!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

brickedphone said:
Haha. My Galaxy Mini got 6782. Superior to Note.
Sent from my superior Samsung Galaxy Mini using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please go away troll

Ignore or report him.

Got 3953 on stock Galaxy Note
I think i had over 4000 on the old Quadrant, but could be just variance between runs i guess.
I wonder what the Transformer Prime will get if it now supports quad core benchmarking and ICS It already had a pretty impressive score in ISC compared with 3.0 (waiting for mine to arrive hopefully tomorrow).

um
pre-update first time benchmarking on Darky 3.3 with franco kernel
5k+
post-update first time benchmarking on darky 3.3 with franco kernel
4691

3917 stock KJ4
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

4578 with rocket rom and Franco kernel

Quadrant kept crashing my phone so I ran antutu and got 7101. Don't know if that's good or not for that program as I've never ran it. I'm on rocket 22 with abyss 3.8
From the Beast : Galaxy Note

Running stock deodexed and Francos v2 kernal
Highest after running three straight but an average of 4700
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Where are the 6-7 k benchmarks this was rumored to be getting 4000 is weak i get that on my single core infuse ...
Sent from my INFUSE powered by ZEUS

5008
Darkrom 3.3 Franco kernel #2

Got it working. 4838
From the Beast : Galaxy Note

Ueihtam said:
5008
Darkrom 3.3 Franco kernel #2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not bad
Sent from my A500 ICS dream machine

My 4.2.2 Kernel/Rom Benchmark thread

Sup guys, going to be making a comparison between different kernels running on different roms. I know that some of you are going to go on about how benchmarks don't mean anything, if that's you then simply disregard this post.
All roms will be tested with nothing except Gapps (not signed in), Titanium Backup and AnTuTu installed, TB and everything else will be closed before the benchmark.
3 benchmarks will be done, and I will post the average total score.
PAC-ROM
First of is PAC-rom (v20.0.0), by the developer aways who has been making a huge impact on the i9000 rom scene with numerous different roms.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2170768
Stock Kernel (I believe this is stock CM10.1 kernel, with lower total ram than all the other kernels, BM is NOT enabled):
Average is 3837
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Fishears LVM 1/03/2013:
Average is 3902
Click here
Stay tuned... more kernels and roms coming soon.

which is best rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

Well that depends, what would be the use that you're planning for your smartphone?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

my tip
casileon said:
Well that depends, what would be the use that you're planning for your smartphone?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2075637 with 410MB RAM.
I am very satisfied. Follow the instructions and you will not regret it.

AW: My 4.2.2 Kernel/Rom Benchmark thread
I get higher score with nolvm fishears around 4400
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

CM 10.1 with Semaphore kernel, Bigmem not enabled, OC 110% and I got 5140.

My average score is 2200 on Antutu benchmark.
Galaxy S I9000
Slim_Bean 2.5
Semaphore_JB_2.9.15s
CPU: 1000 Mhz

k4mi1o0 said:
CM 10.1 with Semaphore kernel, Bigmem not enabled, OC 110% and I got 5140.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you get that? Mine only 4k++ with almost same setting with yours.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2

tiger bean good rom :good:

HellyBean 0323 based on CM10.1
Devil Kernel 4.2 0204
Live OC 120%
CPU 1440 MHz

chatlaxs said:
tiger bean good rom :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes im using it two days and very impressed its the fastest and lightest Rom ive used on a S1

Supernexus GT-I9000
WebMonster21 said:
Yes im using it two days and very impressed its the fastest and lightest Rom ive used on a S1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can I do it?