Database Users

[ROM]'~~~*boLTEd*~~~' v0.35 (04/03/11)

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Image by frostman89
First off I would like to thank everyone who tested and showed support to me, Derek and Brian, second of all the original thread for our ROM is HERE << this is where you will get the most support. Expect this in ROM Manager soon. More updates to come, I am still working with Drod to figure out the recent apps in the framework. Until then please enjoy this ROM and Kernels. They are all using the BFS and undervolted as low as possible without affecting waking. THEY DO NOT affect data. Please wipe before install. Thanks and more to come soon!
BROKEN:
Nothing
Wipe first!
**************************UPDATE (04/03/11)**************************
Same version, the only thing that was changed, was the wifi module was incorrect. Same download link.
The wifi module being incorrect broke wifi, and wireless tether.
This version now also defaults to 998 MHz. Just because the kernel allows you to overclock to 1.8 GHz, does not mean you should, remember that
**************************UPDATE (04/02/11)**************************
Script fixes/changes.
New Kernels (Updated BFS Patch)
Goodbye recent apps in notification bar.
**************************UPDATE (03/31/11)**************************
v0.3 uploaded, check changelog.
Introducing: boLTEd v0.3 by Drod2169 and B16
Based off of the most recent official build of the thunderbolt, base rom from Adrynalynes debloated rom.
FIRST OFF: THANKS TO @TEAMANDIRC AND FRIENDS FOR MAKING THIS POSSIBLE. THANKS ADRYNALYNE FOR PUTTIN' OUT GOOD SH*T. THEY ****ING ROCK!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Linear Theme by BGill55 and friends - HERE
Stock theme included
Features:
***************v0.3**************
Bye bye GPS icon (bgill55)
Bye bye AM/PM (bgill55)
Hello 1.8GHz Kernel (Pre loaded)
Few more tweaks to the guts!
***************v0.2**************
Since there are kernel issues with CWM, the kernel w/ ramdisk edits I made will be uploaded seperately as a PG05IMG.zip. Otherwise,
I virtually made it meaningless (for now)
Ads blocked by default (NOTE: This will cause issues with words w/ friends)
- To enable adds, run the script in terminal emulator (adblock -on or adblock -off enables/disables respectively)
Sense/AOSP Lockscreen option
- To switch back and forth, run the script "lockscreen" in terminal emulator (w/out quotes)
lockscreen -aosp enables aosp lockscreen (reboot to take effect) lockscreen -sense re-enables the sense lockscreen (reboot to take effect)
System Read/Write or Read/Only scripts
-To use this, run the script "sys" in terminal emulator (w/out quotes)
sys -rw mounts the system re-writeable, sys -ro mount the system read only.
VM tweaks moved to init.d due to kernel issue
Tweaked the pre-loaded sysctl.conf tweaks
ACTUALLY changed the wifi scan and vm heap size to 180/48 respectively (don't dev drunk)
***********************************
Sysctl.conf support
init.d support
Ondemand gov tweaks
VM tweaks
Fully optimized
Bash and nano added
Wifi scan interval upped to 180 for battery
VM heap size raised to 48
More I/O tweaks.
A lot more I can't think of in the current non sober state I am now.
DO NOT REPOST THIS IN ANOTHER FORUM!!!!
KANG AT WILL. IF YOU DON'T CREDIT, WE WILL TROLL YOU UNTIL YOU DIE.
POST ISSUES HERE NOT ON TWITTER. WE RESPECT OUR FOLLOWERS TIMELINES. KTHX.
If you want a screen shot look at your phone now.
Hosted by CrackFlashers.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
V 0.35 - DOWNLOAD - 194.16 MB
*******BFS UV Kernels******* ROM DEVS: If you want to include it in your ROM let me know, you can use it no problem.
1.0 GHz Kernel - HERE - (Stock speed)
1.1 GHz Kernel - HERE
1.2 GHz Kernel - HERE
1.5 GHz Kernel - HERE
1.8 GHz Kernel - HERE - (Comes pre loaded in the ROM)
******* NEW!!! BFS UV Kernels Version 2 *******[/B] Very stable, but would like to let them float in to everyday use, will be included next release.
1.2 GHz Kernel - HERE
1.8 GHz Kernel - HERE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Install with Clockwork Mod recovery
(Don't forget to wipe Data and Cache please)!!!
Keyboard fixed!
Credits:
Beesley for the homescreen redraw tweaks.
Adrynalyne for being an awesome dev and giving us a deodexed ROM to play with. Also for the SU tweaks.
Overall thoughts, this ROM is amazingly fast for an already amazingly fast phone, there is a lot more we want to add to it.
If you are a current dev and would like to help out hit either b16 or Drod up on twitter to jump in on the greatness
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
B16 Twitter
~~~~~~~
Drod2169 Twitter
~~~~~~~
BGill55 Twitter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Based off Adrynalyne's Debloated ROM.
Cooked ROM by Drod2169, B16, and soon to have other devs!
Donate to Drod2169, I am covering most of the Hotel for I/O, since he got raped for the price of the IO ticket,
I would appreciate it if you donated to him to help with the flight. I would just like a thanks button or a follow on twitter. Donate below for DRod2169.
DONATE

Wrong date Just saying

psufan5 said:
Wrong date Just saying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the 3/31/11 is because it was released on another forum yesterday, 3/31/11.

bp328i said:
I think the 3/31/11 is because it was released on another forum yesterday, 3/31/11.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, I've been using this ROM since yesterday with the built in 1.8 ghz kernel. This is an absolute phenomenal ROM! My highest quadrant was over 2800 right after booting up.

Cool!!! gonna give it a go..

Alright I'm in, will report back shortly.
BTW thanks for the rom. Tell Drod I live in St. Pete, if he gets down this way I would surely buy him a few bruskie's for his work.
P.S. Smith, what is a good economical max clock over 1k mhz if I just want to watch movies and get the best battery life?

I hope you guys enjoy. Let me know!

Hell yeah... Gonna give it a go before I go to work tonight.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Flashed this morning, love the Rom. Runs smooth and the battery life seems better imo.
If I could make a suggestion, I love the five row app drawer a couple of the other roms have. Maybe this could be added at a later update? That and maybe a transparent app drawer. Thanks for all the work that's been put into this!
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

Flashed this morning. The only thing I found not working was the speech to text.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Can u guys replace the htc messenger with cm? HTC messenger suck ass. Gets slow..
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

johndiblasi said:
Can we flash the kernel only on the stock Rom?
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All kernels in the OP work. I have not tried any others.

ajftl said:
Can u guys replace the htc messenger with cm? HTC messenger suck ass. Gets slow..
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have a list of updates in progress. Stay tuned.

b16a2smith said:
We have a list of updates in progress. Stay tuned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome bro. That would be great.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

Very impressed so far (quads 1637, 1714,v1677). Everything seems to be functioning, have to wrap it up for tonight, time to go downtown and get frosty. Will hit this forum up tomorrow. Nothing like going out and depending on your phone when you've just flash a new rom/kernel. But it looks good, I'm confident. Great work, thanks again.

I LOVE this rom! Great battery life, even tho I have it oc to 1.8

crackflashers FTW

jlevy73 said:
crackflashers FTW
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nuff said.

That 1.8 oc is crazy fast. 2863 on quadrant
sent from my lightning fast thunderbolt

Tlowery88 said:
That 1.8 oc is crazy fast. 2863 on quadrant
sent from my lightning fast thunderbolt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it is. 3105 on quadrant

[Q] Fastest Rom (I know another Rom question)

I want to know which is THE fastest rom available for the MT4G. I dont care about features or sense or whatever, all thats important to me is performance. Thederekjay can score 4200 with o/c, i can too. So please people, tell me what rom will help me achieve that uber score!

There are things even less meaningful than Quadrant scores, but there are only few of them.
Judging the speed of ROM by Quadrant score is about as meaningless as it gets.
You want speed? Overclock.
How much? As much as your phone allows, and as much as you're willing to go risking to burn your phone very soon.
What good will it do? Probably nothing.

tristan6100 said:
I want to know which is THE fastest rom available for the MT4G. I dont care about features or sense or whatever, all thats important to me is performance. Thederekjay can score 4200 with o/c, i can too. So please people, tell me what rom will help me achieve that uber score!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant means little to nothing in the real world. It's completely and udderly bogus numbers to make you think you are getting what you want to get.
And here is a perfect example why. I under clocked my phone [768Mhrz] and still hit 2k+ on the Quadrant.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How did i do that. Easily. the program is easily hackable VERY hackable.

Give Faux123's Rom a shot. I can't quote quadrant scores at you because I don't use that, but I can tell you that it's one of the most stripped down, fastest Roms I've flashed onto my phone. And his latest kernel will let you overclock to over 2gig.

AlanB412 said:
Give Faux123's Rom a shot. I can't quote quadrant scores at you because I don't use that, but I can tell you that it's one of the most stripped down, fastest Roms I've flashed onto my phone. And his latest kernel will let you overclock to over 2gig.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would have to agree with you on this. The fastest rom is going to be the most stripped down rom capable of overclocking the highest. I tried this once and got pretty high quadrant scores. Prettty much any AOSP based rom is going to give you high scores though.

MIUI is my daily driver. I used CM and FAUX's Rom's but MIUI runs the best IMHO.
Also ran Unity and several others. Still, MIUI is the best for ME.

alright well thanks guys, im probably gunna try faux aosp rom and ill compare with my current cm7 nightly, ill also compare between thederekjays kernel and fauxs. thanks again

After using almost every single ROM, I can confidently say that when it comes solely to speed, FAUX's ROM is blazing fast.

eqjunkie829 said:
I would have to agree with you on this. The fastest rom is going to be the most stripped down rom capable of overclocking the highest. I tried this once and got pretty high quadrant scores. Prettty much any AOSP based rom is going to give you high scores though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me remind everyone that high freqs pretty much 1.7GHz+ aren't very stable, now 2GHz has a very high power draw and can cause the phone to lockup completely...MIUI/CM7/FAUX would be the top picks as the quickest ROMS, I use MIUI. It's very fast, the cpu governor/cpu speeds you use will also contribute to how quick a ROM will be...Use lower speeds and get more life, but less speed...Or more speed, and receive a shorter life span.

+1 for fauxs aosp rom and thederekjays miu rom w/ demon speed mod. I'd also recommend thederekjays port of preghostchili rom from g2 forums, it is way overthemed but stupid fast and full of built in tweaks and options enabled thru terminal. I myself use it as my daily and have hit 4129 on quadrant using tdj's kernel.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

d12unk13astard said:
+1 for fauxs aosp rom and thederekjays miu rom w/ demon speed mod. I'd also recommend thederekjays port of preghostchili rom from g2 forums, it is way overthemed but stupid fast and full of built in tweaks and options enabled thru terminal. I myself use it as my daily and have hit 4129 on quadrant using tdj's kernel.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow, now that sounds pretty nice, ill flash that once i get the time and ill post some results

Why you so concerned bout the quadrant score, trying to impress someone?
From my fist to your face, enjoy.

If you like Sense try Virtuous Unity Beta and to make it faster try the No-sense script in the Desire HD forum to remove Sense launcher and other Sense bloatness. You can get it here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=993475 and make sure you setup the lockscreen the way you want it before flashing the script because as of now the personalize menu doesnt work.

Mr.Highway said:
Why you so concerned bout the quadrant score, trying to impress someone?
From my fist to your face, enjoy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that's so...Sadly he feels High score=Speed/Perf, but it's really Speed=/=Quadrant score. It's possible to fake a score of 100000 if you hack quad, people have hacked it before. But quad doesn't actually tell you about actual real life performance, which I think matters more. If you really want more speed than just overclock, 1ghz is enough-but do 1.4+ and it's pretty much overkill. For the most speed use performance governor, 1 homescreen, and install no other apps at all and use no widgets. And make the wallpaper a sold color with no scrolling, and don't use any b/g accounts at all.

Why does everyone always get so upset when someone wants to focus on getting a high quadrant score?! He can do what he wants with his own phone and enjoy it how he wants. I used to be concerned about quadrant too until I realized I don't care that much about how fast a rom runs as much as how cool it looks.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium

I live in the real world and use my phone to do real world tasks. I care about 1 thing and 1 thing only. How my phone performs day to day.
If I'm taking credit card payments with Square and prepping an invoice using MobileBiz while also sending emails, making calls and sending texts to clients, or simply taking pictures and video of my 6 month old son, I want it to run smooth. No lag, no hang-ups. Just work. Plain and simple.
MIUI does that and gives me 1 day 22 hours of it. All while running 1017/122 Superbad.
If you people are concerned about how long you can play Angry Birds, go load up Quadrant and run your favorite fart apps while pulling 8000 in Quad and brag all you want.

Holy crap guys whats with all the hate?!?!? To me quadrant is a tool to define the speed of a rom. Whaf i meant is that the higher score u get the faster it is. So if Thederekjay got 4200 its cuz whatever hes running is fast and would.want the performance. I know that the rom isnt whay entirely defines the speed of the phonr but its a majot part of the combination (kernel, OC, governor, vm optimisations). I just wanted the fastest phone so that i would experience the less lag possible while on.my phone and playing games. I only refered to quadrant because it is tool for me to compare my phones performance while testing roms, tweaks, kernels etc. So no its not for bragging
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

YOU think it's not for bragging. YOU think the tool's results are valid info.
In fact, you're wrong, and the tool's results don't mean a thing, and the correlation between them and the actual ROM speed barely exists.
That's what most people tried to explain to you in this thread.

Jack_R1 said:
YOU think it's not for bragging. YOU think the tool's results are valid info.
In fact, you're wrong, and the tool's results don't mean a thing, and the correlation between them and the actual ROM speed barely exists.
That's what most people tried to explain to you in this thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well it sounded more like ppl wanted me to shut up because bragging about your phone is gay but thats not was i was trying to do.

No one complains when a dev posts a screenshot of a quadrant score in a ROM they put out....douchebags.

Show your Antutu Score!

Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged

gozzaa said:
Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run this test just because I was bored. But our phone is ''NOT'' in the list. Its a different phone called wildfire ''S''
But there are many ways that can improve your score on the app (Don't see the point tho as phone is so old and without gpu) try different gov's eg. Performance and you can get a faster sd card eg class 10 (as it collects points for sd reads and writes)

My Antutu score is 932
CM7 build 14 (I find it the most stable one out there)
CPU MAX 768
CPU MIN 748
PERFORMANCE Governor
Compcache 18%
JIT enabled
Surface dithering enabled
Purging of assists enabled
VM HEAP SIZE 32m
Sent from my CM7 powered HTC Wildfire.

Some Info
you can compare wildfires once you have benchmarked your own, under the ranking category, top at the mo seems to have a score of 6126 but that also has a CPU speed of 1200 MHz otherwise there are more realistic ones further down, but i mannaged 1087 score with my wildfire which is still on a stock ROM lol, but as stated SD card makes a difference, i have installed an 8Gb class 10 samsung and modified the cache. But none the less, i have a lot of apps and not much RAM free so i found my score supprising compared with other wildfires. And remember, benchmarks dont represent ability in day to day use or even heavy use, they just give a theoretical overview.
But if you do want to improve your wildfire with visible results and not just numbers, i would recommend some of the below
A Class 10 Memory Card
Increase the cashe size of the memory card (improves Read/Write) but not too far i have found problems at higher values apps like SD speed boost are nice
Task Killer, automatic ones are good and save you effort :L
Overclock and undervolt with a governor appropriate for your use, this gives massively improved performance on demand and save battery when that performance is not required
New ROM, athough i have not done this personaly there are many a report of speed improvements due to less bloatware on ROM's like cyanogenmod
Move apps to SD not so much a speed thing but if you have a fast card then it saves internal space with no loss in performance
Apps like Optimize toolbox, Set CPU and memory booster helped with these.
so i am sure if i flashed a new ROM i could get my score up to 1100 at least if not further and there are things i have not tried yet so i would not say a score of 1200 is out of reach and you could probably go further, but not 6126 as antutu seems to think :L
if there is anything i have missed please tell me and i will add to the list, hope this helps

Mine tested for fun as I don't give a monkeys about it.
HTC wildfire: LeWaOs

Too lazy to screenshot
Score: 856
ROM: KoolSense
CPU:352-710MHz interactive governor

Rempuzzle, 748-768 performance, however I normally use 176-768 conservative.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

My total score was 958 using cm7 rc3
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

Using Rempuzzle 2.71
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2

usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium

usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

nejc121 said:
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Scratch0805 said:
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
I think mine dropped after I installed many apps, during my "app rush" stage. That was when I was so crazy about apps since I had to limit myself on the Wildfire or I'd have to sacrifice one app to get another lol!
Maybe when I root this phone, after it gets Revolutionary S-OFF (Only option is HTCDev now which I don't trust) I can get TrickDroid or the unofficial CM9 Alpha10!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2

My score: 1067
Oxygen 2.3.2 with Juwe Ram script
768-176 performance
normal i use 729-518 SmartassV2
score: 1062

usaff22 said:
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:

nejc121 said:
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium

Justice™ said:
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually for the Novo7 Aurora, but the tablets are practically the same, save for the IPS display on the Aurora.
There's also a Ubuntu and ICS dualboot ROM, but that one does need a hardware keyboard atleast once (Just for the first login, you can get an onscreen one later)
Otherwise, the Elf II did come out recently, but that one doesn't have any ROMs yet :silly:

Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.

Scratch0805 said:
Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So was it underclocked at first or was it the stock clockspeed and you wanted to OC it?

It has a Mali 400 if I'm not mistaken, just downloaded ex tweaks to setup something else and noticed the Max gpu speed was 276 so it must have got underclocked somewhere along the way.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Kernels Performance

Hey guys
since i saw a lot of kernel for the beast N7100
and i think a lot of you may be asking which kernel to choose
i liked just to make a small comparison for those kernel via Antutu Benchmark
some of you care for the performance results, and some just want a balance Kernel
therefore i tested almost all kernel for the SAMMY based kernels and upload the pix for you
in this way you may get a better idea how might your phone look alike, But also you have to watch you Battery​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1600 MHz​
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1800 MHz​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 2000 MHz​
Correction for 2 kernel name, Perseus 1.36, and Redpill 1.47​
It migt be not so important for you,
but if you think i helped you
please do not hesitate to click the Thanks button ​

alright but now do some tests for battery life, i think thats no1 reason what people want in custom kernel
use every kernel for few days with "normal" usage and do screenshots every day of battery and screen on time when batttery goes critical. i planned to do that but kinda lazy
also it would be good to do some recording of wakelocks on every kernel.

trpi said:
alright but now do some tests for battery life, i think thats no1 reason what people want in custom kernel
use every kernel for few days with "normal" usage and do screenshots every day of battery and screen on time when batttery goes critical. i planned to do that but kinda lazy
also it would be good to do some recording of wakelocks on every kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats indeed better, but me also cant make the test for battery...since i daily or every 2 days change a rom....my phone is not stable on any rom lol

Were these benchmark runs only once?

McLaren__F1 said:
Were these benchmark runs only once?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u mean one test for kernel, then yes

good comparison.. which rom where u using while doing the testing??
also which baseband and build?

This is so completely irrelevant to anyone but you. A single run of benchmarks is in no way indicitave of a kernels performance.
Anyone making the decision to flash a kernel based solely on a screenshot of some benchmarks should just stick to stock and save themselves the hassle.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium

fake_japanese_guy said:
good comparison.. which rom where u using while doing the testing??
also which baseband and build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On alliance rom v3 dmc3 baseband xdkl7...when ur rom will be ready ?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

This is so completely irrelevant to anyone but you. A single run of benchmarks is in no way indicitave of a kernels performance.
Anyone making the decision to flash a kernel based solely on a screenshot of some benchmarks should just stick to stock and save themselves the hassle.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So where is ur point?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

mrlove6 said:
So where is ur point?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My point is that the information you have provided is useful only to you and even then it isn't particularly useful.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium

conantroutman said:
My point is that the information you have provided is useful only to you and even then it isn't particularly useful.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe thats ur opinion..when benchmark and kernels are never important there was no need to invent the benchmark. ...anyway ill try to contact phonearena.com and gsmarena.com and tell them to stop testing phones on benchmark ( useless ) becuase u said so. Thanks for ur pass
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

it is interesting someone post a result with 3d score 863 for a note 2. do you know what that mean?

Means overclicking so much isnt good with this kernal...and as u see I think its the only one have low value
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

mrlove6 said:
Maybe thats ur opinion..when benchmark and kernels are never important there was no need to invent the benchmark. ...anyway ill try to contact phonearena.com and gsmarena.com and tell them to stop testing phones on benchmark ( useless ) becuase u said so. Thanks for ur pass
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They actually use repeatable tests. Or at least I hope they do. Not just you running the benchmark once...
If you want even a modicum of respect in the field of scientific testing, you'd have given the details of the ROM version in use, and also the process used to average the results over a number of executions.
Scientific tests are based across running one test multiple times without changing anything, as it increases the reliability of the results if they agree with each other.
Usually you can discount the lowest and highest result each time you repeat the same test, but then you need to average the remaining results. I'd expect that benchmarks should be normally distributed around the actual score.

mrlove6 said:
Hey guys
since i saw a lot of kernel for the beast N7100
and i think a lot of you may be asking which kernel to choose
i liked just to make a small comparison for those kernel via Antutu Benchmark
some of you care for the performance results, and some just want a balance Kernel
therefore i tested almost all kernel for the SAMMY based kernels and upload the pix for you
in this way you may get a better idea how might your phone look alike, But also you have to watch you Battery​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1600 MHz​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1800 MHz​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 2000 MHz​
It migt be not so important for you,
but if you think i helped you
please do not hesitate to click the Thanks button ​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got (1600Mhz) 1800+ score in AnTuTu ...without any junks i got 18500+
NEAK kernel...
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium

Which rom u r using ?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

Omega Rom v16+SaberKernel:good:

Wow your scores are pretty bad. I use to get 19,000+ with ARHD and Perseus kernel OC to 1.8Ghz and UV down to -50mv. However, I also realised that if you keep benchmarking repeatedly one after the other you will get lower scores due to built up of heat and other factors such as RAM usage. So the question is: How long did you wait between benchmarking a kernel and what were the precautions you took before initiating a benchmark run? And what was the average score of each kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

bushako said:
Wow your scores are pretty bad. I use to get 19,000+ with ARHD and Perseus kernel OC to 1.8Ghz and UV down to -50mv. However, I also realised that if you keep benchmarking repeatedly one after the other you will get lower scores due to built up of heat and other factors such as RAM usage. So the question is: How long did you wait between benchmarking a kernel and what were the precautions you took before initiating a benchmark run? And what was the average score of each kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u take a look on the screenshots, u will see exactly the time and the average compared to the 3 oc 1600 1800 and 2000

Maybe re-run the test? Clear Memory, Kill apps before running each test?
Take the average of lets say 3 runs?

[6045*][GUIDE]Battery-efficient Alcatel Idol 3

Hello everyone!
I was asked by several members to make a guide which has a goal of extending the battery life of our beloved phone.
If you seek a more detailed and more specific guide for battery life,check out the thread by nero curin
So,without further ado...
The apps I use are Ex Kernel Manager and L Speed,therefore the first thing to do is to,of course,get your hands on those two apps!
Here is the setup I use,shown on screenshots(who would want to bother reading tons of things,or even write them):
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Credits to the creators of L Speed and Ex Kernel Manager. .-----.​

The Marionette said:
Hello everyone!
I was asked by several members to make a guide which has a goal of extending the battery life of our beloved phone.
So,without further ado...
The apps I use are Ex Kernel Manager and L Speed,therefore the first thing to do is to,of course,get your hands on those two apps!
Here is the setup I use,shown on screenshots(who would want to bother reading tons of things,or even write them):
Credits to the creators of L Speed and Ex Kernel Manager. .-----.​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi marionette
thanks for your hardwork
but in the kernel CM 12.1 RANDOM REBOOT FIX when i set the settings and kill the app and restart the app the cpu is going to 1497 mhz ??

Alek Dev said:
hi marionette
thanks for your hardwork
but in the kernel CM 12.1 RANDOM REBOOT FIX when i set the settings and kill the app and restart the app the cpu is going to 1497 mhz ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isn't about the tweaks,that kernel has buggy frequencies which stay at max.
Sent from my 6045K using Tapatalk

The Marionette said:
It isn't about the tweaks,that kernel has buggy frequencies which stay at max.
Sent from my 6045K using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know the problem it's with the kernel not tweks,which kernel did you suggest to doesn't have reboots... and tweak work

Alek Dev said:
i know the problem it's with the kernel not tweks,which kernel did you suggest to doesn't have reboots... and tweak work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well...
The only kernel which is working properly is the newest one.
But you can try taking a kernel from older cm builds,one of the kernels has to work with your variant.
Sent from my 6045K using Tapatalk

The Marionette said:
Well...
The only kernel which is working properly is the newest one.
But you can try taking a kernel from older cm builds,one of the kernels has to work with your variant.
Sent from my 6045K using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its weird, I've installed the 4/3 build several different times, one time i only had to go back to stock because i screwed something up messing with permissions to get viper to work but on that particular flash i had working data and only one sim icon for a few days. Today when getting sick of stock and trying to go back to that 4/3 build all of a sudden i got 2 sim icons and wonky data. Ive tried to reflash a few times thinking it'd fix but nope. Wonder why its so random.
Sent from my 6045O using XDA-Developers mobile app

The Marionette said:
Hello everyone!
I was asked by several members to make a guide which has a goal of extending the battery life of our beloved phone.
So,without further ado...
The apps I use are Ex Kernel Manager and L Speed,therefore the first thing to do is to,of course,get your hands on those two apps!
Here is the setup I use,shown on screenshots(who would want to bother reading tons of things,or even write them):
Credits to the creators of L Speed and Ex Kernel Manager. .-----.​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this.....works great. 3 days in and no problems, and definite improvement. I am on fixed income, but have had ROM Toolbox Pro, and was able to use performance settings to make adjustments without buying another app. Very much appreciated! :good: (60450, stock rooted, Xposed, Adaway, removed Seeder in case of conflicts, PIA VPN)

dongarritas said:
Thanks for this.....works great. 3 days in and no problems, and definite improvement. I am on fixed income, but have had ROM Toolbox Pro, and was able to use performance settings to make adjustments without buying another app. Very much appreciated! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah,I discovered that Kernel Auditor can be used to shut down several CPUs.
Sent from my 6045K using Tapatalk

The Marionette said:
Yeah,I discovered that Kernel Auditor can be used to shut down several CPUs.
Sent from my 6045K using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've used Kernel Adiutor a few times, but I could never get the settings to stay put. The Big cpu always managed to change my min and max settings whenever it felt like it. I just went on ahead and bought ex kernel manager just so I wouldn't have to pull my hair out using the previous program.

kingoftheafro said:
I've used Kernel Adiutor a few times, but I could never get the settings to stay put. The Big cpu always managed to change my min and max settings whenever it felt like it. I just went on ahead and bought ex kernel manager just so I wouldn't have to pull my hair out using the previous program.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahhhhh.
You can use Kernel Auditor to shut down CPUs. With it,only 2 CPUs of each cluster are online(2 at max-1300 and min-800,other two at max-900 and min-800.

The Marionette said:
Ahhhhh.
You can use Kernel Auditor to shut down CPUs. With it,only 2 CPUs of each cluster are online(2 at max-1300 and min-800,other two at max-900 and min-800.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernal audiutor usually seems better then ex but I've had Adiutor change things back to stock, so I always save a profile.
I'm pretty happy with the way the darkness governor handles things for big cpu. (for mine)
Sent from my ALCATEL ONETOUCH 6045I using XDA Labs

The Marionette said:
Ahhhhh.
You can use Kernel Auditor to shut down CPUs. With it,only 2 CPUs of each cluster are online(2 at max-1300 and min-800,other two at max-900 and min-800.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I've done that a few times but the program itself I didn't really enjoy using in conjunction with lspeed also. I'd rather use whatever the devs and builders use to ensure I get the best out of each build.
Sent from my 6045O using XDA-Developers mobile app

Well I've had the same issues on this build using the ex kernel manager and the exact settings you listed. The kernel decides to boost up to max whenever it feels like it and set on boot doesn't change anything. I'm getting annoyed with this phone. It's like I got a cursed one that just doesn't feel like being tweaked. I don't know what else to do at this point. I'm not getting any better battery life than before. Honestly I think it actually got worse. I think I'm just gonna go back to stock and not mess. With this thing anymore. I'm about to throw it out the second story window of my house.
Sent from my 6045O using XDA-Developers mobile app

kingoftheafro said:
Well I've had the same issues on this build using the ex kernel manager and the exact settings you listed. The kernel decides to boost up to max whenever it feels like it and set on boot doesn't change anything. I'm getting annoyed with this phone. It's like I got a cursed one that just doesn't feel like being tweaked. I don't know what else to do at this point. I'm not getting any better battery life than before. Honestly I think it actually got worse. I think I'm just gonna go back to stock and not mess. With this thing anymore. I'm about to throw it out the second story window of my house.
Sent from my 6045O using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea they boost what to max because of mpdecision (as I'm told) which is supposed to be like touch boost, but trust me I feel your pain because it's all the same problems for me to, I average 2 an ½ consistently no matter what I do. However, If you can get 3 hours + I don't think it's so bad, that's pretty average for most phones I've had. But big cores Always run the battery down for me, and if they don't, the little cores do because they stay high frequency all the time making up for the big ones. It's like it honestly does have a mind of its own.
The best battery life I got so far is just over 3 hours, and I always use the OC Kernel because most others reboot for me or run more erratically, so if you haven't tried the OC yet I'd say give it a shot before you ditch back to stock.
Tho news with marshmallow on the way it might be worth waiting for on stock...
Sent from my ALCATEL ONETOUCH 6045I using XDA Labs

tbkrazeey said:
Yea they boost what to max because of mpdecision (as I'm told) which is supposed to be like touch boost, but trust me I feel your pain because it's all the same problems for me to, I average 2 an ½ consistently no matter what I do. However, If you can get 3 hours + I don't think it's so bad, that's pretty average for most phones I've had. But big cores Always run the battery down for me, and if they don't, the little cores do because they stay high frequency all the time making up for the big ones. It's like it honestly does have a mind of its own.
The best battery life I got so far is just over 3 hours, and I always use the OC Kernel because most others reboot for me or run more erratically, so if you haven't tried the OC yet I'd say give it a shot before you ditch back to stock.
Tho news with marshmallow on the way it might be worth waiting for on stock...
Sent from my ALCATEL ONETOUCH 6045I using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeh the news about getting MM was awesome. I average about the same screen on time as you do, around 2.5 hours. The only rom I didn't have issues with battery wise was the i806 oc build from unjustified, but because it hasn't been updated I started having boot issues. I think I'm gonna see about going back to a previous 12.1 marionette build I was using that gave me around 4-5 hours screen on time or just revert to stock rom with underclock kernel.

kingoftheafro said:
Yeh the news about getting MM was awesome. I average about the same screen on time as you do, around 2.5 hours. The only rom I didn't have issues with battery wise was the i806 oc build from unjustified, but because it hasn't been updated I started having boot issues. I think I'm gonna see about going back to a previous 12.1 marionette build I was using that gave me around 4-5 hours screen on time or just revert to stock rom with underclock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to do stock with underclock for battery life specifically but underclock reboots for me :/ I know that has to be the best chance for battery life with it
Sent from my ALCATEL ONETOUCH 6045I using XDA Labs

tbkrazeey said:
I wanted to do stock with underclock for battery life specifically but underclock reboots for me :/ I know that has to be the best chance for battery life with it
Sent from my ALCATEL ONETOUCH 6045I using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just did that and had the same experience. Reboots for days. I guess when we finally get MM more debs will pop up and support for the phone will rise again. Right now it seems development has stopped and we are relying on build after build. If I was smart enough I'd give development a shot.
Sent from my 6045O using XDA-Developers mobile app

kingoftheafro said:
I just did that and had the same experience. Reboots for days. I guess when we finally get MM more debs will pop up and support for the phone will rise again. Right now it seems development has stopped and we are relying on build after build. If I was smart enough I'd give development a shot.
Sent from my 6045O using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your variant should be nearly the same as mine, just locked to a carrier and mine isn't, so more then likely they have the same likes and dislikes when it come to kernels. And yea hopefully mm will spin things up again.
I've been considering attempting to learn some stuff to help with development myself, I have a tiny bit of experience with stuff but not a lot, but everyone has to start someone, it's either you can learn it or you can't...
Sent from my ALCATEL ONETOUCH 6045I using XDA Labs