I want to hear from you too guys. What is best rom for you and what setting are you using like scripts, which kernel, tweaks etc.
including new roms like PrimeHD, FireDroid, GingerJHv etc.
It would be better if you could write like pros and cons including antutu score or similar otherwise its hard to understand anything just from one word or sentence without any explaining
dont make chaos here please
My favorite is Gdx
Pros:
-the smoothest scrolling ever
-perfect 2D
-nice 3D performance
-fast, stable and reliable(no FCs)
-everything is working
Cons:
-Huge battery drain!!!
I was on alfs v06 kernel running v6supercharger script oc @ 768mhz
Antutu: 1800+ (it has improved a lot for new roms especially 3D score)
goldenr said:
My favorite is Gdx
Pros:
-the smoothest scrolling ever
-perfect 2D
-nice 3D performance
-fast, stable and reliable(no FCs)
-everything is working
Cons:
-Huge battery drain!!!
I was on alfs v06 kernel running v6supercharger script oc @ 768mhz
Antutu: 1800+ (it has improved a lot for new roms especially 3D score)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Another cons for GDX is lack of updates. (I know doixanh its busy...)
Im using Firedroid v01 its super fast and usually gets over 700 3D score and a total of over 2000 in antutu with overclock 806 Mhz
Sent from my E15i using Tapatalk
Im using ginger dx with stock kernel
not overclocked and
-its fast
-great for gaming
-works almost evrithing
-no1 for me gingerdx v022 by doixanh
I am using S-rom V8 with nAa v09 kernel.
-Fast
-Quite smooth
-No bugs
-Good for normal gaming.
IM PROUD
well im proud to say that i have this score @600mhz..how much more if i OC it..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
yes, that's 1927..
>ROM: FroyoProv2.4
>Kernel: Stock
>tweaks: 99xtweaks by xtreme people
>odexed my phone
>ondemand governor
PROS
>very fast as you can see in my score
>using smartass governer has no lags even if you set the max cpu to 480mhz..its still fast..
>very good performace for gaming
>very good battery life
CONS
>its FROYO, but who cares, its much faster than others who have gingerbread or cm7 roms..
before i installed the rom i followed this guide
hit thanks if i helped you!
wow :0 u have outstanding 2D score comparing to CM7 roms
Thank you for sharing.
Yes indeed..
Sent from my XPERIA X8 using xda premium
baiclark said:
well im proud to say that i have this score @600mhz..how much more if i OC it..
View attachment 907377
yes, that's 1927..
>ROM: FroyoProv2.4
>Kernel: Stock
>tweaks: 99xtweaks by xtreme people
>odexed my phone
>ondemand governor
PROS
>very fast as you can see in my score
>using smartass governer has no lags even if you set the max cpu to 480mhz..its still fast..
>very good performace for gaming
>very good battery life
CONS
>its FROYO, but who cares, its much faster than others who have gingerbread or cm7 roms..
before i installed the rom i followed this guide
hit thanks if i helped you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that's what you usually get with FroyoPro, nothing special.
Sent from my XPERIA X8 using xda premium
heres my specs:
ROM: gingerdx v022 (gonna change soon, getting bored of no new updates)
KERNEL: ALF'S V06
anTuTu:
RAM: 112
CPU integar: 193
CPU flow point: 150
2d graphics: 417
3d graphics: 445
database IO: 130
SD card write: (3.5 MB/s) 35
SD card read (9.5 MB/s) 95
CPU frequency: 600 MHz
Total score 1577
BTW i could change CPU frequency if i wanted but if it is above 700 my phone will reboot
The fastest rom so far is FireDroid 1.0 with ALFS 7 ICS. No need for scores - trust me on this one.
altera.hr said:
The fastest rom so far is FireDroid 1.0 with ALFS 7 ICS. No need for scores - trust me on this one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but the whole point of the thread was to show your scores LOL
Sent from my X8 using XDA App
Well yes! dont be lazy! ;D but thats not the most important obviuosly, the most important is how stable and fast a ROM is!
I just thought maybe this will help for someone who doesnt know which rom to choose!
And I want to know too, what others think!
I've been using MinCM7-2.1.x for the last week or so now, seems to be very stable so far with the latest nAa kernel. Has pinch-to-zoom functions, everything working (e.g. camera, radio) and has nightly builds. Great ROM, fast as hell, well worth a look at!
Update on MiniCM7-2.1.9 benchmark results (this benchmark is NOT on a clean install / has many apps installed which probably isn't the best way to benchamrk this ROM, I will update results with results from a "clean" install);
Update:
As a fresh / clean install the score is nearly identical @ 1642 SCORE.
want to see
Currently using MiniCM 2.1.9 with Naa kernel and extremely happy with it.
AtiCM v3 was extremely fast for me but was unable to install Whatsapp so switched to MiniCM.
OK.... I just benchmarked the FireDroid 1.0 ROM. - Clean ROM install with Alfs07-ICS kernel (AnTuTu, Screenshot it and TaskManager installed only!). First thoughts is this ROM is super-fast and will be amazing with some more work. Not tested too much but the first thing I noticed was no support for HPSA, only able to use 3G. Pinch-to-zoom works perfectly. Camera works, not tested radio functionality.
Benchmark results below. I noticed the SD Card Read performance was low-ish after first benchmark (benhmark app installed to phone memory in the first benchamrk, then moved it to the SD Card and re-run the test which seemed to slightly improve the data speed but decreased other functions, both outputs below):
If HSPA was working in this ROM I would happily keep using it, but I'm going back to MiniCM7 for now!
I use ROM: Achotjan Semc Debrand Engine | V1.0_Beta-2 | FreeXperia Project |
-it's nice,
- fast,
- new,
- it's look like original 2.1.C.0.0 but it's original copy of Xperia Mini.
Bugs for now:
- (wifi- for someone works),
- USSD codes problem= com.android.phone it's not resposonding
Everything work fine!
You just need unlock bootloader, nAa v11 and be happy.
Achotjan Semc Debrand Engine | V1.0_Beta-2 | FreeXperia Project
Related
Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
TylerD004 said:
Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
useless..scores can be faked easily
ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention, my highest quadrant scores (1600ish) come from the ROM that feels the least smooth overall for me. I'm using virt 2.6 right now and I get around 1400 on the first pass and it is the smoothest (scrolling, previews, in general not lagging when I try to do something) sense ROM I have used. God knows I've used them all at one point or another.
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, please don't fake scores so that our community can work together to find the fastest ROM.
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
bhazard451 said:
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I happen to agree. Its blazing fast. Still needs some things for me to be able to switch over to it, but I wouldn't mind going full time on a vanilla ROM.
The smoothest sense ROM Ive used is Virtuous, but the more feature packed roms like SR and CM have more stuff than I need.
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
larsrya8 said:
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
why is this under development?
TylerD004 said:
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Discuss the DEVELOPMENT of ROMs. This actually should go in Q&A. Your need for attention is trumped by the topic of the forum, IMO.
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freakin hilarious!
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's too easy to call BS on this one.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u2 godliest rom ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pentium II doesn't even score that high.
Sent from XDA App
Unrevoked Root and Sucked-off
2.0.5 Baseband
SkyRaider 3.0 Vanilla
#1 King Bad F*cking **** Kernel OC to 1.13
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
I'm running Ruby 1.1.1 and I get around 1350 which is about 150 less than what I was getting with stock froyo with KingKernel 1 overclocked to 1.15, but Ruby runs smoother and faster for me which will always matter more than a dumb benchmark number
Running virtuous 2.6 with KingxKernel BFS #4 gets me 1637 @ 1.19GHz, one of my friend gets 1693.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
shabubu said:
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This forum is inherently about tinkering. People who tinker like metrics. My 2400 winpoint on Homerun Baseball 3d is a pointless number too, but I still like making it higher
It's a fun stat that doesn't mean much, but it's still fun.
Did they move this thread I clicked General not development?
Droid Incredible General
Discussion about the Verizon HTC Droid Incredible (tips & tricks, etc)
OK OK I got bored and we're back for now!
Features:
BLN works works works works works works works works works works works works works!
1.5GHz Overclock
Voodoo Sound v7
Undervolting via Xan's Voltage Control app
A cool boot logo
Voodoo Color
"Unlocked" FPS cap
Xcaliburinhand's Gingerbread Dock Fixes (still unmerged with teamhacksung)
Bugs:
SetCPU seems to be working better, but don't count on it
Download: http://goo.gl/JU9aE
Download:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Grab your nightly build here: http://goo.gl/lh6J3 (Usually done ~1:10 AM EST depending on the workload of the processor and bandwidth available at the given time)
Disclaimer: This will eat your babies
Actually, I'm not responsible for any damage this kernel might do to the space-time continuum (or your phone)
Don't forget to hit thanks or buy me a root beer! Of course you can also follow me on twitter or get me more dropbox space
I pride myself on opensourcing my work for people to build on: https://github.com/ytt3r/android_kernel_samsung has the stuff.
Follow Shaolin95's mini overclocking guide: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=10936691&postcount=1102
Credits
TheEscapist
Morfic
Netarchy
Codeworkx
Coola
Atinm
Kang or Kangsterizer or whatever he goes by it confuses me
Supercurio (Seriously, donuts to him! All of his hard work powers this.)
everyone's re-using my patchs & stuff for lagfix/color/sound
and even make pure clones of my kernel (i'm thinking about Dark something)
and as a result i get 0 contribution (open source way)
and 0 donation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changelog for build #10
Fixed BLN for reals
New recover that writes over bad blocks instead of skipping them
Rebased on 2.6.35.11 "bug-free"
Changelog for build #7
Fixed all the bugs build #5 introduced (I think)
Changelog for build #5
Voodoo Sound v7
Overclock up to 1500MHz
Voodoo Color (71 of you said we needed it, I guess majority rules... )
"Unlocked" FPS Cap
100% working BLN
Awesome flashing right now.
Does the UVing work with MIUI or is the same as with the Escapists kernel?
Works with MIUI, untested on cm7. Problem is with MIUI, the sliders aren't calibrated to the screen right so its tough to slide and get a good voltage.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
ytt3r said:
Works with MIUI, untested on cm7. Problem is with MIUI, the sliders aren't calibrated to the screen right so its tough to slide and get a good voltage.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya so same thing with the Escapists deal, Ill test, but happy to see this. Flash went successful.
EDIT: Voodoo Sound doesnt work, and it seems pretty choppy right now at 1.2 OC with MIUI
EDIT 2: OC'ed at 1.4 its flies. But 1.3 it was still choppy. Odd.
And just a request you think you could try Kanging voodoo color from the Escapist's kernel?
For some reason everything is choppy after a boot but before you turn the screen off and on. Also, voodoo sound is 100% there, have you run the app?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
ytt3r said:
For some reason everything is choppy after a boot but before you turn the screen off and on. Also, voodoo sound is 100% there, have you run the app?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it isnt choppy any more I just OC'ed to 1.4 which I have never done before but the phone is handeling it well and its going super fast.
And ya I have the Voodoo Control app up, I tried doing headphone ampliphier and it force closes
edit
Will give this a go tomorrow
MIUI
oooh. ill flash right now on cm7 and let you know
Sent from my SGH-I897
I am liking this kernel.
OC'd to 1.4ghz and ran linpack for the hell of it.
19.5 MFLOPS. Most I've ever seen on my phone. :|
CM7 + Trident ftw
lol I got mflops of 26.5 the other day on the last Trident build
Sent from my SGH-I897
26.5 how? That sounds unbelievable lol.
it was random. I was getting 20 steady. if you look on the top captivate scores it would have been the fourth or fifth highest lol
Sent from my SGH-I897
stuff said:
I am liking this kernel.
OC'd to 1.4ghz and ran linpack for the hell of it.
19.5 MFLOPS. Most I've ever seen on my phone. :|
CM7 + Trident ftw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya I have never run my phone at 1.4 but thats the only thing that makes MIUI not really choppy.
But it really has payed off its 100% stable for me and the fastest my phones ever been. Getting about 19.5-20 in Linpack, and just overall the phone flies.
So heres my equation for success:
MIUI B6+Trident FTW
Dlev7 said:
ya I have never run my phone at 1.4 but thats the only thing that makes MIUI not really choppy.
But it really has payed off its 100% stable for me and the fastest my phones ever been. Getting about 19.5-20 in Linpack, and just overall the phone flies.
So heres my equation for success:
MIUI B6+Trident FTW
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am currently running miui at 800 and I do not find it choppy at all
MIUI
steady linpack of 19.5, slightly lower than my average on #30. get this, quadrant score of 2475 first run
Sent from my SGH-I897
oh and two questions for you, ytt3r. first, what's the kernel Hz values at? and what's the voltage for 100mhz, 850?
Sent from my SGH-I897
Did neldar finally port BLN to Gingerbread/Nexus S?
Not sure if it's just me..
but it appears this only lets my CPU scale down to 1ghz.
I cannot get it to change at all.
My phone freezes on quadrent standards lol
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
the CM CPU adjuster I've noticed does that.. I use SETCPU. and it works fine if you have the latest version and don't use set on boot
Sent from my SGH-I897
Just wondering what other peoples epic can pull off in quadrant so I guess post a screenshot below and tell us what your running.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
me personally am running Legendary ROM 3.3 w/ IAP Rebirth kernel.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
dunno how to capture screen.. mine is 2516.
im on acs ics v4 ei22
no O/C
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Screenshot it worked for me and for overclock you use voltage control if you'd like to.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Score: 2665
SyndicateROM Frozen 1.2
Genocide Kernel 2.0
OC 1400 Mhz
I an quite happy with my score.
1.4 GHz.
My daily driver OC is 1.2 and that gets me a 3292.
ACS ICS EI22 V2.
Send from my SPH-D700 (Samsung Epic 4G)
Quadrant is pointless for measuring real world performance.. but here is my highest:
1.6ghz on ACS Bamboozle (EF02)
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
tbob18 said:
Quadrant is pointless for measuring real world performance.. but here is my highest:
1.6ghz on ACS Bamboozle (EF02)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Biggoron said:
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha, yeah. It can be fun, reminds me of my 3Dmark days.
Nothing special, the score is from a few months ago.. I froze most of the services and closed everything (about 130mb ram used in task manager)
I was using Tegrak to OC. Settings were 1600mhz, 1400mv core, and 1125mv internal.
Beware, running your phone at these kind of voltages is dangerous and could kill your phone. At 1.6ghz it was not completely stable and would freeze after about 10-15min.
Yeah I can imagine mine barerly handles 1.4 and likes to freeze just running this app every 30 mins or so. Any scripts or anything if not man could only imagine if you ran the v6 script mine runs at around 120mb of ram in task manager 70 in the running services.
tbob18 said:
Ha, yeah. It can be fun, reminds me of my 3Dmark days.
Nothing special, the score is from a few months ago.. I froze most of the services and closed everything (about 130mb ram used in task manager)
I was using Tegrak to OC. Settings were 1600mhz, 1400mv core, and 1125mv internal.
Beware, running your phone at these kind of voltages is dangerous and could kill your phone. At 1.6ghz it was not completely stable and would freeze after about 10-15min.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Nice scores with the overclocks, too bad they are boosted with quadrant scripts.
Get pro and see how inflated I/O performance is.
I wish devs would stop cheating.
Biggoron said:
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also its good for comparing e-pen1s' =D
From what other sections on XDA have told me, they've said quadrant scores mean nothing. I do believe the benchmark isn't quite accurate.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
MikeEx said:
Nice scores with the overclocks, too bad they are boosted with quadrant scripts.
Get pro and see how inflated I/O performance is.
I wish devs would stop cheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, that's how it goes. Smartbench seems to be more accurate, but it is still a synthetic benchmark.
Biggoron said:
Screenshot it worked for me and for overclock you use voltage control if you'd like to.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I tried O/C it now. I'll post the screenshot later when i get back home.
I got 3603 with a fresh install of StarskyROM 1.4, only tegrak (1.3 Ghz) and quadrant installed. It promptly froze up 2 minutes later. I generally get ~2500 with no O/C on that ROM.
A noobs score. Don't be too harsh!
My quadrant score using legendary rom beta 3.3 on the nubernal+ kernal (EI22) with ICS theme running Go Launcher Ex.
My score is far lower than everyone elses but give me time. I'm still a noob (god that puts a bad taste in my mouth) lol!
Hard to see I know. My screenshot app was working great until yesterday... just over 4000... 4083 I believe
Era legendary rom 4.0.1 overclocked to 1.44 ghz using samurai 1.4 kernel...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
My phone will only support 1.252 or below, but my highest was in the 3800's, with Legendary and IAP
New highest 4504 at 1.5 Ghz
Sent from my OG Epic
Hi guys, I have an arc S from a few weeks, after several tests I found a rom that flies in quadrant, these are the results:
4030 pts without overclocking
4739 pts with overclocking @ 2000 (v15 doom-Kernel)
All the other roms, including Cyanogen v 7.2, have a maximum in 2200-2500 pts.
The rom is SE-tweaked.
How can this difference in performance?
i bet that the guy that made that rom included the quadrant hack, nothin special imo.
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
johnbarleycorn said:
probable, because the result is very high, there is a way to verify this?
However, the rom runs pretty fast and without lag, much better than the original.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try antutu benchmark and nenamark 2.
antutu 3500-3600 pts
nenamark2 14.8.
The quandrant booster apk not change the results.
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
With what clockspeed?
Ran Antutu with dtock rom and SuperCharger V6 @ 1.4GHz and got 3781 as highest score.
Didn't try it in arconium 5.6 yet
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@1.4 without Supercharger V6.
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Flo95 said:
Antutu is normal then, but good improvement compared to fully stock
Arconium 5.6 scored 3622 in first run and now my phone does some hevay background tasks and I only get ~3400
EDIT:
Now it are 3757 @ 1.4GHz smartassV2
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got 3924 @ 1.6 GHz smartassV2 on my Arc S.
Nice, what ROM do you use?
Even if Benchmarks say nothing about real use, it's nice to compare
Yesterday I made one test @ 1.8GHz and scored 4285 points
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Look in the signature, same ROM you're using.
I'll try 1,8 GHz too, but 2 GHz not any more, seems like my CPU can't handle it.
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium
Nice, sorry. Tapatalk doesn't display signature so I can't see them.
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
arneh1992 said:
When i do the Quadrant benchmark, my score is only like 2000...
I run Arconium 5.6, Supercharger v6, doomkernel v15 @ 1.4ghz?
Why is mine so damn low?
And can someone upload a screenshot of their benchmark with quadrant(A)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's totally normal to have that score.
The guy just used the quadrant hack, if you run different benchmarks (e.g. AnTuTu, Vellamo, etc.) you'll notice that your device is nearly the same to other results.
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
arneh1992 said:
Ok ok, i always thought it was still not as fast as it could be... So this is max?( i don't want to OC more)
Cause i use regina as launcher, and when i turn back to home it sometimes have to load it all again...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is maximum?
Quadrant scores between 1800 and 2400 are normal imo.
I mean like, cause i use arconium, doomkernel and supercharger i thought it would be faster... But getting scores around the 2000 is the maximum for me, or can i get it higher( without overclocking more )? I wanna play a lot of games with minimum lag
Quadrant scores say nothing!
Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk
Well i dont really know why but my Arc with doomkernel v15 @1.6GHz hit the score of 3982 at Antutu benchmark.. Maybe is the sd booster i use..
Sent from my LT15i using XDA App
My V6 custom ROM - NOT released V6 yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Used Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
This was done on 3-28-2012. Pretty much all the ROMs have had new releases since then. So these benchmarks do not accurately reflect the current performance of the ROMs.
Full wipe procedure done before each flash.
Coldboot done for each ROM before running Quadrant. Not doing coldboot resulted in lower I/O score in some cases.
Testing was done using the default settings and kernel of the ROM. No kernels were flashed separately.
Overclock was tested only if the ROM and its default kernel supported it, using the maximum frequency allowed in the ROM's settings + force GPU rendering set to enable in developer settings.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Android 4.0.4 ROM
What the hell is going on with the 2D scores? Why is stock so far ahead of the others?
I dont have any fancy diagrams or tables like you but...
I ran quadrant on eos build 12 and got a total of 3.5k (average, 3 runs).
Settings: CPU at 1.4Ghz, no forced gpu rendering.
Breakdown:
cpu: 6200
memory: 3200
I/O: 6000
2D: 110
3D: 1800
Interesting though that stock ICS performs that well compared to the other roms.
So in raw performance there isnt much difference between custom and stock rom, until you start tuning the cpu.
cspiby said:
What the hell is going on with the 2D scores? Why is stock so far ahead of the others?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Enabling "force GPU rendering" on other ROMs increases the 2d scores to around 400.
horndroid said:
Enabling "force GPU rendering" on other ROMs increases the 2d scores to around 400.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is that stock rom doing that by default or what?
cspiby said:
So is that stock rom doing that by default or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably.
I tested it again. Stock ROM is giving those scores without force gpu rendering
Funny thing, stock is way better with 2d rendering, EOS and CM9 are faster in I/O...
Yup, the reason EOS and CM9 have such high scores is because of the I/O. I wonder how perceivable the difference is to an average user.
Team EOS's has a tiny FPS lag when scrolling home screens despite its high score.
Just got a quadrant score of 4237 with CM9 lastest (28-03) and guevor test 4 kernel at 1640mhz.
Here's what I got. Pretty much same as yours.
horndroid said:
Here's what I got. Pretty much same as yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So there was a bump in performance indeed.
---------- Post added at 06:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:49 PM ----------
Now theres a build out with Android 4.0.4 (march 29) Maybe even more performance increases.
CM9 keeps getting better and better.
Looking forward to 4.0.4 benchmarks vs 4.0.3!
There wasn't really any performance increase in 4.0.4. The changes probably had to do with something else.
CM9 March 28 version + stock kernel
CM9 March 29 version(Android 4.0.4) + stock kernel
Looks like the forced GPU rendering didn't score as high this time though; do you know the explanation? Just curious, not particular adept at computer stuff so unnecessary to answer if you don't have time..
asdfuogh said:
Looks like the forced GPU rendering didn't score as high this time though; do you know the explanation? Just curious, not particular adept at computer stuff so unnecessary to answer if you don't have time..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you should give much thought to those minor differences.
The scores fluctuate way too much. Honestly, only 3 attempts don't give accurate averages.
asdfuogh said:
Looks like the forced GPU rendering didn't score as high this time though; do you know the explanation? Just curious, not particular adept at computer stuff so unnecessary to answer if you don't have time..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks to me like it scored 8 higher... or are you comparing to the score when overclocked to 1.64GHz?
Frozn. Full wipe and coldboot as usual.
include revolver
horndroid said:
Frozn. Full wipe and coldboot as usual.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was waiting to the Frozn release but comparing its benchamark with the CM9 ones I think that I am going to continue using CM9.
DammedKiller said:
I was waiting to the Frozn release but comparing its benchamark with the CM9 ones I think that I am going to continue using CM9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep. just checked on my cm9 with test8 kernel @ 1,7Ghz:
total: 4185, cpu: 8230, mem: 3274, io: 7466, 2d: 121, 3d: 1834
(2d is low, because 'force 2d' makes some apps flicker and also lowers all other stats in this bench )
so I think I'll stay on CM9