Database Users

[POLL] Which ROM yeilds the highest Quadrant score?

Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!

TylerD004 said:
Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
useless..scores can be faked easily

ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention, my highest quadrant scores (1600ish) come from the ROM that feels the least smooth overall for me. I'm using virt 2.6 right now and I get around 1400 on the first pass and it is the smoothest (scrolling, previews, in general not lagging when I try to do something) sense ROM I have used. God knows I've used them all at one point or another.

i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.

ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, please don't fake scores so that our community can work together to find the fastest ROM.

Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.

bhazard451 said:
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I happen to agree. Its blazing fast. Still needs some things for me to be able to switch over to it, but I wouldn't mind going full time on a vanilla ROM.
The smoothest sense ROM Ive used is Virtuous, but the more feature packed roms like SR and CM have more stuff than I need.

Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.

larsrya8 said:
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.

why is this under development?

TylerD004 said:
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Discuss the DEVELOPMENT of ROMs. This actually should go in Q&A. Your need for attention is trumped by the topic of the forum, IMO.

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freakin hilarious!

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's too easy to call BS on this one.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u2 godliest rom ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pentium II doesn't even score that high.
Sent from XDA App
Unrevoked Root and Sucked-off
2.0.5 Baseband
SkyRaider 3.0 Vanilla
#1 King Bad F*cking **** Kernel OC to 1.13

Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.

I'm running Ruby 1.1.1 and I get around 1350 which is about 150 less than what I was getting with stock froyo with KingKernel 1 overclocked to 1.15, but Ruby runs smoother and faster for me which will always matter more than a dumb benchmark number

Running virtuous 2.6 with KingxKernel BFS #4 gets me 1637 @ 1.19GHz, one of my friend gets 1693.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

shabubu said:
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This forum is inherently about tinkering. People who tinker like metrics. My 2400 winpoint on Homerun Baseball 3d is a pointless number too, but I still like making it higher
It's a fun stat that doesn't mean much, but it's still fun.

Did they move this thread I clicked General not development?
Droid Incredible General
Discussion about the Verizon HTC Droid Incredible (tips & tricks, etc)

Highest Galaxy S benchmark ever.

Here, I prove that synthetic benchmarks fail.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

My god.... How the heck did you do it?

Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).

The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4

I got 3147 quadrant with miui rc4 and oc to 1300MHz.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

progene81 said:
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so called lag fix for start, and some other tweaks including OC.
But lag fix itself gives a huge boost in quadrant.
I do agree synthetic benchmarks suck especially concerning phones since there are many chips, and many other optimizations for particular CPUs, and they're not equal in either implementation or HW is so much different that comparisons are pointless.
For instance snapdragon might lack with raw power, and our hummingbird is better, but when it comes to SIMD instruction ALUs snapdragon wins + quadrant's optimization for snapdragon et viola...

rschenck said:
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda like this?:

theduckking said:
Kinda like this?:
View attachment 565756
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.

rschenck said:
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)

theduckking said:
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there an App for that?

I made this score

Using GingerCriskelo V27 and CF-Root 3.0
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

My score:
+ The feeling of a pretty darn fast ROM
Of course the usage was pretty low over the weekend but still^^

Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..

So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

Tk-Glitch said:
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

w7nt3rmut3 said:
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 - Use a RAMdisk for Quadrant storage;
2 - Use old graphics driver from NS;
3 - Overclock.
Overclocking the bus will lead to faster RAM, so faster I/O score from the RAMdisk.
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 1.2GHz. Sorry^^.
At 1GHz, ~4000.
And with 1.4GHz, 4800-4900.
1.5GHz here :
Now 1.4GHz only, but with a faster bus speed, resulting in a boost on I/O and memory scores :
EDIT : Added *lololz* screenshot.
EDIT2 : Replaced *lololz* screenshot by a 1.5GHz one for even more LULZ.
EDIT3 : Added faster bus speed to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

edited
10 chars

coldflid said:
Photoshop...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).

Tk-Glitch said:
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i didn't mean yours, i totally believe yours, i meant the one on the first post, and now that i look it more closely it doesn't seem fake.
Sorry

Quadrant Advanced scores!!!!

samsung galaxy s quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz custom rom ext 4 fps uncapped
Total 2014
Cpu. 1691
Mem 1780
I/o. 5359
2d. 359
3d. 1027
samsung galaxy s2 quadrant advanced scores 1.2 ghz stock rom
Total 3381
Cpu. 7046
Mem 3823
I/o. 3929
2d. 888
3d. 1199
Im getting it! Lol

7000 for CPU?!

screenshot or link would be nice

demo23019 said:
screenshot or link would be nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html

Yeah that's the link. Wait until the devs get a hold of this phone and tweak the I/o speed, uncap the gpu and of the cpu. Imagine the score then. Sanding as redeem themselves from the behold 2 and the gps issues of the original sgs. IT ALSO SCORED A 47 MFLOPS IN LINPACK IN 1.55s. BEASTING.

MikeyMike01 said:
7000 for CPU?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.

KingKuba13 said:
Yeah seems rather weak, get over 7500 on a stock tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try comparing GLBenchmark scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

golf2vr6 said:
I think it's this one:
Yep it is:
http://domarmstrong.blogspot.com/2011/04/samsung-galaxy-s-2-benchmark-tests.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rotating planets missing textures , there is not suppose to be pale planets and white background. Also reports of several high profile games not working...
I really wish Samsung used Nvidia tegra or PowerVR SGX , those two companys were in GPU business long time they can write proper GPU drivers , mali is peace of crap.

Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.

Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

rovex said:
Quadrant standard works ok, and Advanced worked for me after a few runs. Im sure these issues will be fixed in later firmware releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its actually issue with Quadrant. Quadrant advanced and professional editions are stuck at version 1.1.6 which is known to have issues with phones running Gingerbread ROMs like SGS2.
So those scores are flawed.
Standard edition has been upgraded to version 1.1.7 which works without these issues with gingerbread. Ironically those who paid are left in ditch at the moment with lack of update

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
lol quadrant

Makes sense. Its probably why Advanced gives me consistently 5 to 10% lower scores. The textures do seem unstable, sometimes they work, sometimes not.

MaBlo said:
Take a look at this if you think Mali is inferior to Tegra.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060416
Oh and in my experience Quadrant is flawed. Badly.
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.

KingKuba13 said:
Checkout Smartbench 2011 Gaming.....
All these benchmarks should be take with a grain of salt.
Anyone have a SG s2 with tegra 2 tested yet?
With 2.3 and less pixels to push should have interesting results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wonder if samsung is going to cap the frame rate on the tegra 2 version of the phone?

Incredible CM7 Benchmark Scores (Post here)

I don't know how I got this, I usually only get 4100 and 4200 max but some how I ended up getting 4451! This defiantly competes with the SGS2. Please post any score you have here!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
LOL, and our OC isn't even near as high! 1.1 vs 1.5 ghz!!

SICK! Wow I cant f**king wait!

Chubby_Skunk said:
SICK! Wow I cant f**king wait!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL if we break 1.1... that would be amazing. I wouldn't be surprised to see wayy over 5000!

Do yal not understand how out of date quadrant is? Its results are worthless on any dualcore phone period.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

jug6ernaut said:
Do yal not understand how out of date quadrant is? Its results are worthless on any dualcore phone period.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, yeah I'm pretty sure every one knows that. It's just fun being silly with it

This should be in general, not themes and apps.

Why is that ?... post about a quadrant score , which is an app .
Is there any good benchmark for dual core ?

ofek said:
Why is that ?... post about a quadrant score , which is an app .
Is there any good benchmark for dual core ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's called real lief performance.
If everything works with no lag = epic bench mark
If something lags = crappy software

xploited said:
Yeah, it's called real lief performance.
If everything works with no lag = epic bench mark
If something lags = crappy software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol +0+0+0+0+0+1= +1

Use Chain Fire (CF) Bench... much better for dual core

CaelanT said:
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well this is sort of where this kind of benchmark stuff has always been.

CaelanT said:
This should be in general, not themes and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is an App

1. How are you doing a quadrant benchmark? Mine errors out at "decoding video". (10/12)
2. I am working on a 1.2 ghz overclock kernel. So far a lot of bugs, maybe that's why quadrant failed... if I succeed, I will try 1.4... if I can even out the major bugs I will release it.
Also, just want to add that on said kernel I got a 6752 overall in Chainfire...
Kthxbai
Sent from my friend's Atrix

trvstw said:
1. How are you doing a quadrant benchmark? Mine errors out at "decoding video". (10/12)
2. I am working on a 1.2 ghz overclock kernel. So far a lot of bugs, maybe that's why quadrant failed... if I succeed, I will try 1.4... if I can even out the major bugs I will release it.
Also, just want to add that on said kernel I got a 6752 overall in Chainfire...
Kthxbai
Sent from my friend's Atrix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're likely getting an error at "decoding video" because you have used your camera. In order to get quadrant to work properly, you have to run a benchmark before you've opened the camera and caused it to force close.

thegregulator said:
You're likely getting an error at "decoding video" because you have used your camera. In order to get quadrant to work properly, you have to run a benchmark before you've opened the camera and caused it to force close.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
Sent from my friend's Atrix

Smartbench 2011
Awesome Benchmark...
does graphics tests

whats the point hight quadrant or any benchmark if the phone stills laggy and can't play 720p lose the fingerprint captabilities and webtop?!
if you want hight quadrant without webtop and fingerprint buy another phone xD lol
just saying.....please don't interpret me wrong

or, if you want all those features, don't install a pre-beta version of a ROM?
highest quadrant score i've gotten so far is 3400-3500, what are you guys doing with your settings to get so high?

Alcapone263 said:
or, if you want all those features, don't install a pre-beta version of a ROM?
highest quadrant score i've gotten so far is 3400-3500, what are you guys doing with your settings to get so high?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure how many times you've tried the test, but I did it about five times in a row and each time my score raised by about 150 until it steadied at 4200 or so. Make sure to free as much RAM and extra processor usage as possible using a task manager or similar. Also, are you at 1.1Ghz? That's what I'm at with the kernel that came with the CM7 pre-beta install. I believe it is faux's kernel.

vinay427 said:
I'm not sure how many times you've tried the test, but I did it about five times in a row and each time my score raised by about 150 until it steadied at 4200 or so. Make sure to free as much RAM and extra processor usage as possible using a task manager or similar. Also, are you at 1.1Ghz? That's what I'm at with the kernel that came with the CM7 pre-beta install. I believe it is faux's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, and unmount your storage (just plug it into the computer, mass storage)

Share your benchmark score! (any application test you want)

I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5

theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?

Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.

Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz

CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)

Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?

Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)

vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?

Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart

Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points

For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.

vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?

k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.

Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!

@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point

What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.

Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App