This discussion aims at getting our x10 the best ROM or kernel or any MOD of all TIME!!
Benchmarking is an easy way to test your phone performance.Either CPU,2D & 3D graphics or SD card and Data transfer.
you can do it simply by software like AnTuTu or Quadrant.
The Point in this discussion is to test your phone and write ur best score at all time.Then you tell us your phone status.and tell us what is -in your opinion is the cause of your high score,so that we can determine which are best ROMs,Kernels or CPU governors,etc.
Please notice that Benchmarking is A ROUGH indicator of your phone performance. it is not necessarily that your phone is slower if you have lower scores
PLEASE SHARE YOUR
1.Best score.
2.which software did u use? scores are very different.
3.ROM.
4.kernel.
5.CPU min/max.
6.CPU governor.
7.SD card info.
8.Opinions.
Thanks,
Omar.
---------- Post added at 01:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:37 AM ----------
MINE are:
1.1624
2.Quadrant.
3.WB 5.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.
5.192/1152 Mhz.
6.Performance.
7.8GB sandisk,class 6.
8. i think WB tweaks has increased my scores specially in v 5.0.
also overclocking and performance governor-CPU @ 1152 all the test-.
I was just about to ask this myself
1. 38.45 (Avg of 5 tests)
2. Linpack Pro
3. WB 5.0c ROM.
4. WB stock with OC tweak
5. 245/1152 Mhz.
6. interactive
7. 32GB Sandisk, class 4.
8. None.
It would be great if devs could post the performance stats of their Rom with their releases
1.- 2592
2.- AnTuTu Benchmark
3.- CM7 ZMOD
4.- DooMKernel v5 with overclock
5.- 128 - 1113 mhz
6.- smartassv2
7.- stock 16gb class 2
8.- I think you can get a better score with a tweaked rom, a better sd card and another cpu scaling
Score: 1795 Quadrant Advanced
ROM: MIUI 1.9.16 by 28Spawn with SWAP included- no data restored.
26fps stable on graphics- 2D leaf
class 2 stock 8gb card
Kernel: DooMKernel 05 for unlocked bootloader min 128 max 1075 smartass v2
8. SWAP files incrase my performance greatly. Tweaks do nothing but drain battery and cause lag. IMHO.
2352
Quadrant standard
Spaarc oxygenated gingerscape
Stock kernel
Locked bootloader
245-1113
Basic z oc
Zdzihu smartass
Memory card class 4
6.8 mB/s read
11.9 mB/s write
sent from my Android powered smart phone
1. 1.288
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. 1.152 / 128
6. Interactive
7. stock 8GB
8. None
KuSkUS_68 said:
1. 1.288
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. 1.152 / 128
6. Interactive
7. stock 8GB
8. None
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your benchmarking should have a higher score.is that the highest one?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Prodigy said:
Score: 1795 Quadrant Advanced
ROM: MIUI 1.9.16 by 28Spawn with SWAP included- no data restored.
26fps stable on graphics- 2D leaf
class 2 stock 8gb card
Kernel: DooMKernel 05 for unlocked bootloader min 128 max 1075 smartass v2
8. SWAP files incrase my performance greatly. Tweaks do nothing but drain battery and cause lag. IMHO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
spaarc said:
2352
Quadrant standard
Spaarc oxygenated gingerscape
Stock kernel
Locked bootloader
245-1113
Basic z oc
Zdzihu smartass
Memory card class 4
6.8 mB/s read
11.9 mB/s write
sent from my Android powered smart phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
romasalah said:
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm using x10 very well ...
Search for gingerscape in x10 development thread
sent from my Android powered smart phone
romasalah said:
I think your benchmarking should have a higher score.is that the highest one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually that's what I thought comparing yours.
I have been trying other governors and the best score till now is 1378 with smartassv2 (tried only interactivex, interactive and smartassv2)
I'll keep on trying with other settings...
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass
Skumtomten said:
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude it's the rom Not smartass
https://picasaweb.google.com/100227745563198630514/DropBox#5651119841938055298
romasalah said:
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
spaarc said:
Dude it's the rom Not smartass
https://picasaweb.google.com/100227745563198630514/DropBox#5651119841938055298
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back
scoobysnacks said:
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1376
That's the score after disabling the tweak
scoobysnacks said:
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does MIUI uses this hack?
I got 1804 with MIUI 1.9.16
@1152-smartass v2
romasalah said:
does MIUI uses this hack?
I got 1804 with MIUI 1.9.16
@1152-smartass v2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no idea. anything over 1500 or 1600 is generally pretty suspect though
Skumtomten said:
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah,thanks I know about smartass and i use it. But i always have a wrong belief that performance is the best governor for benchmarking.May be cause it's always operates the processor @ Max frequency
---------- Post added at 06:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:15 PM ----------
scoobysnacks said:
no idea. anything over 1500 or 1600 is generally pretty suspect though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i guess MIUI may be using it...with AnTuTu my benchmarking is normal -from 2500 to 2700- but with Quadrant my I/O has increased from 600 to 1600 after MIUI.
...more of a test...
1.
a) 2262 (3087)
b) 1274 (at the third times), (1440)
c) 37 MFLOPS (over 39)
d) 60 sec. (51 sec.)
e) 30 fps (31.2)
2.
a) Antutu benchmark.
b) Quadrant
c) Linpack
d) SQLite
e) Neocore
3.XperiaTW 6.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.b
5.128/1113 Mhz.
6.SmartassV2.
7.16GB,class 6 Kingstone.
8. I state that the test results, the present condition (full of applications, more than 100, then the X10 is under stress), are lower than those obtained in the past without so many applications installed. I have met with many peaks FROYO (TW custom ROM) and are shown alongside those of the scores in brackets .. I tried several tests in the past who now do not use hardly any, this thread I have "suggested" to review the scores to currently, although the comparison is not reasonable
Sorry for my English, I used google translate
1. 1.004
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. stock
6. Im a Noob so dont know Its all at standart^^
7. stock 8GB
8. None
Cecco1970 said:
1.
a) 2262 (3087)
b) 1274 (at the third times), (1440)
c) 37 MFLOPS (over 39)
d) 60 sec. (51 sec.)
e) 30 fps (31.2)
2.
a) Antutu benchmark.
b) Quadrant
c) Linpack
d) SQLite
e) Neocore
3.XperiaTW 6.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.b
5.128/1113 Mhz.
6.SmartassV2.
7.16GB,class 6 Kingstone.
8. I state that the test results, the present condition (full of applications, more than 100, then the X10 is under stress), are lower than those obtained in the past without so many applications installed. I have met with many peaks FROYO (TW custom ROM) and are shown alongside those of the scores in brackets .. I tried several tests in the past who now do not use hardly any, this thread I have "suggested" to review the scores to currently, although the comparison is not reasonable
Sorry for my English, I used google translate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for doing all these tests..
a large number of app affects memory testing and I/O..but i think not too much it doesn't have great range to play with.
Also i noticed high peaks with AnTuTu reaching above 3000 only with FROYO.
and noticed high graphics scores..may be double GB. but i don't know why .
Can't state that froyo has higher graphics than GB -although i heared alittle of that - Coz i didn't see high benchmarks with Quadrant in froyo.
Related
Here is Mine.... 4434 on Stock FW....
STOCK 2.3.6
XXKL3
PLEASE SHARE YOUR ROM AND KERNEL VERSIONS WITH QUADRANT STANDARD SCORE.
[14-02-2012] Edit : Quadrant standard now Updated to new version with dual core support.
Download from Market
That seems like a good stock score, I was getting anywhere between 3600-4400 on stock, but my highest score is around 5000 when overclocked. Quadrant may aswel just be a random number though, that's how useless it is.
I am on stock and consistently around 4,000.
Mine is a 4414 on a custom rom.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
4472 with stock KL7 @1,6 via tegrak
5885
Rocket ROM V12 with Abyss 2.6, 1.7GHz
I have gotten as high as over 4500 and as low as around 3300.My scores tend to vary quite substantially.
Most are around 3800.
In power saving mode,i only get around 2600.
Croak said:
5885
Rocket ROM V12 with Abyss 2.6, 1.7GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am gonna try ROM V12. Now I have Darkynote with a score of 3800.
Croak said:
5885
Rocket ROM V12 with Abyss 2.6, 1.7GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you run your note at that speed constantly, or just for benchmarking? I'm just wondering how safe and reliable a 300mhz overclock is.
I used Antutu because it compares my phone with other comparable phones and not just phone near extinct phones
i also used Antutu and my score is lower by hundreds than the original firmware when it was shipped which was KK1.
Here my score-
I love my note but i am very upset Note is having 800MB ram & S2 is having 1gb RAM
Firmware XXLA3 (STOCK)
KERNEL- 2.6.35.7-N7000XXLA3-CL880036
TWEAK- TEGRAK OVERCLOCK ULTIMATE
maniacscorpio said:
Here my score-
I love my note but i am very upset Note is having 800MB ram & S2 is having 1gb RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But, the Note does have 1GB of RAM. It probably just shows it as 800MB because of system processes or something.
Also, for those who posted scores, I think it would be helpful to post your firmware, ROM, kernel, and any overclocks/settings you may have applied.
k1ng617 said:
But, the Note does have 1GB of RAM. It probably just shows it as 800MB because of system processes or something.
Also, for those who posted scores, I think it would be helpful to post your firmware, ROM, kernel, and any overclocks/settings you may have applied.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then why S2 shows 0.98gb of ram instead of 800mb.......
my score 5638
maniacscorpio said:
then why S2 shows 0.98gb of ram instead of 800mb.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, i have no idea. But I'm sure the Note has 1gb of RAM
maniacscorpio said:
then why S2 shows 0.98gb of ram instead of 800mb.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 800mb is what is avail to you for handling your activities, while the remaining 200mb is probably hidden for the phone to handle essential functions (i think). Besides, Antutu shows 1gb of RAM during the testing
---------- Post added at 04:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:43 PM ----------
I also had the same problem so what I did was clear ram, restarted then ran the test
Ive only rooted, and this is what i got.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
FerretAD said:
View attachment 861697
Ive only rooted, and this is what i got.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try again and again you ll get score around 4000+
Please share your rom and kernel versions with quadrant standard score.
This thread is simply for people to display their benchmark scores instead of cluttering development threads,hopefully it'll be used for what its intended
Sent from my Xperia X10 using xda premium
Sent from my Xperia X10 using xda premium
FERALAB V21 - FeraKernel V3.6 GB Stock UB
UPDATE :
ROM and Kernel : Feralab V21 and Ferakernel V3.6 UB Stock GB.
CPU Freq : 998 MHz and 1190 MHz
FPS2D : 54 fps
Note :
Was posted on the original thread
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
FYI
Regards
my post moved from Developent
antutu score - 4329
fps2d - avg 44
kernel: FeraKernel 1.7 NV
ROM: scritch007 CMX10 v6
Clock: min: 245 max: 1190 performace deadline
transparency: 16bit
surface improvement: disable
sd card: standard 8GB - delivered with phone
XPERIA X10i Hardware
SDCard: SanDisk UHS-I 64GB (SanDisk Ultra Mobile Class6 4GB card used for benchmarks)
Battery: Mugen Power 1800mAh
DoomKernel v6 unlocked bootloader with GB v2.3.3 (My Daily)
Kernel: DoomKernel v6
ROM: X10S v9 GB 2.3.4 (95 system applications)
Add On: XPERIA S Apps
CPU: SetCPU 1113-1228MHz Governor: SmartAssv2/Performance i/o: sio
Optimisation: Link2SD with second partition.
3DMark: n/a Not available for X10i
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 3109 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v3.1.1: 3242 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v3.2.2: 3317 @ 1190MHz
AnTuTu v4.0.4: 4130 @ 1228MHz
NenaMark2: 8.4fps
FPS2D: 54 avg
iPerf: 22Mbits/s write to NAS over 802.11g
Quadrant: 1019
GeekBench2: 542
Battery: 5days where phone is left to idle and only very light use..
Epic Citadel: 11.2fps @854x480 on performance
Yes, it wouldn't really be playable on an XPERIA X10i but the benchmark does have it's uses given the graphics environment
and besides, it looks pretty while benchmarking even with the major lag/freezes... .
I would post a screenshot, but I use aScreenshot.apk and it gets swapped out to run Epic Citadel .
SDcard benchmark for a range of cards
Amin Kernel with CM10 v8.1(Scritch007)
3DMark: n/a coming soon
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 4550 [clock:1190MHz][Governorerformance][i/o:sio]
NenaMark2: 11fps
FPS2D: 43 avg...No Adreno 200 2D HW acceleration
Quadrant: 1044
GeekBench2: 448 clock:1128MHz raw CPU grunt doesn't seem to better OC'd GB 2.3.3 ????
Epic Citadel: 11fps ...lower frame rate but appears to run smoother.
Achotjan JB 4.1.2 Somc Debrand Engine Project
3DMark: 537
AnTuTu v3.0.3: 5840 [clock:1228MHz][Governorerformance][i/o:deadline]
NenaMark2: 11.2fps
FPS2D: 50 avg...Adreno 200 2D HW acceleration
Quadrant: 1005
GeekBench2: 386 clock:1128MHz raw CPU grunt doesn't seem to better OC'd GB 2.3.3 ????
Epic Citadel: n/a
FeraLab GB V21 + Bares V2 Add-on
FINALLY!!!
I get 3382 for 998MHz and 3574 for 1113MHz.
The problem?? Haha.... That's weird....
Please use Antutu Benchmark v3.0.3 instead the latest one!!!
So for those who can't get the score, PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THE OP AND BARES'S POST!!!
DON'T FORGET THE ANTUTU BENCHMARK VERSION TOO!!
998MHz
1113MHz with RAM Manager [Balance (More Free RAM)]
This is my score after install everything into the phone
Last but not least, THANK YOU FERA AND BARES!!!
Απ: Benchmark Thread
V21 with Bares addon!
Στάλθηκε από το X10i μου
memory card score below average?
what type of sd card u all using? because mine is class 10 of 32gb but cant get score like u all get for sd card reading and writing only half of what u all get.
i only get 3049 antutu benchmark 3.0.3.
Scores don't really matter.i find youtube videos play better with 4.5 fera stock kernel.they dont lag or buffer.on 3.6 they do.that's om my phone.the 4.5 kernel does get a lower benchmark score but performs better watching videos and playing games
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
bodomfan said:
Scores don't really matter.i find youtube videos play better with 4.5 fera stock kernel.they dont lag or buffer.on 3.6 they do.that's om my phone.the 4.5 kernel does get a lower benchmark score but performs better watching videos and playing games
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I though this thread just for benchmark test result only (for all roms and kernels) , lol .
Also, i just read your post on Fera's thread, it seem. ....... ???
BTW, okay my friend, i will delete all those files, no problem I'm just try to share it.
also i dont want to messed the thread, and made confusing, sorry my bad .
@Antony & Prioxxx
Bro, above kernel and addon are Feravolt's work,
so. ... all credits goes to him.
I'm just re-pack it, so we can use Ferakernel V3.6 UB on Feralab V21 rom with the proper methode (at least for me).
Goodbye and, yeah have a nice day everybody
Best Regards
Keep 3.6 addon for ppl who prefer it
I just prefer 4.5 kernel
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
Hi!
It is normal to get 2769 in AnTuTu v3.0.3 with Feralab v21 UB without mods and 1.113 GHz?
The phone seems very fast and stable, but do not understand the result.
Thank you!
Greetings!
-=SrgiO=- said:
Hi!
It is normal to get 2769 in AnTuTu v3.0.3 with Feralab v21 UB without mods and 1.113 GHz?
The phone seems very fast and stable, but do not understand the result.
Thank you!
Greetings!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi bro, definitely this is normal.
But i have one question here :
Have you tried Ferakernel V3.6 UB before? , on any GB stock rom? such as Feralab V20?
Regards
CM7zmod3 DoomKernel v6 1113MHz ULBL
latest antutu
Sent from my X10 using xda app-developers app
Bares said:
Hi bro, definitely this is normal.
But i have one question here :
Have you tried Ferakernel V3.6 UB before? , on any GB stock rom? such as Feralab V20?
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello!
Then, I can breathe easy xD
Yes, I tried various combinations, both as DonutHD 2.3 UB and FeraLab v20 UB with Ferakernel 3.6. UB. Performance is excellent but a week of use, I began having reboots with FeraLab v20, did several wipes and factory resets but still the same. However are the best I've had (DonutHD and FLv20).
Now I'm testing the FeraLab v21 and now everything is very smooth and no reboots for now...
Thank you very much for your attention.
Greetings!
Rom : Feralab V21
Kernel : Ferakernel + Bares's Addon
AnTuTu v3.2.2
AnTuTu 3.2.2 is now available from Google Play store.
It appears to be adding a 'considerably' higher 3D and slightly higher 2D graphics score now. CPU Integer scores drop slightly.
Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10i benchmarks running DoomKernel v6 and GB 2.3.3
I have the same build for over 6 months with only minor build.prop 'tweaks' and the odd bit of memory freed after culling system apps down to 95, so I'm not thinking this is anything much different about my build, but I am seeing approx 208 points extra in the score since AnTuTu v3.0.3 and most of that is coming from 2D and 3D graphics scores.
Just to be all white coat, beard and thick rim glasses, I did re-install AnTuTu v3.0.3 again and re-test. The results are still consistent with old scores where we see higher CPU integer score and lower 2D and 3D graphics scores with AnTuTu v3.0.3
My old AnTuTu v3.0.3 score was 3109 and my current re-tested AnTuTu v3.0.3 score is 3101 - 3124 so any increase in AnTuTu scores is a reflection of AnTuTu's new version 3.2.2 and not any changes in your build.
So with the AnTuTu v3.2.2 scores we should all be seeing approx 200 points improvement on our AnTuTu v3.0.3 scores before we even consider any improvements attributed to developer changes.
Mind you if I was a ROM developer I'd be happy my ROM increased by 200 points in an AnTuTu benchmark over 3 months, even when I'd done nothing, but smiled and waved.
All a bit of a giggle, but it's nice to see the XPERIA X10i going up in AnTuTu scores with the same ROM/Kernel build rather than going down.
---------- Post added at 03:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 AM ----------
As a separate update with regards to benchmarking, I see Futuremark has listed 02-APR-2013 for Android.
Futuremark 3DMark for Android
[Update] I see that 3DMark is not supported on the XPERIA X10i, I tried side loading and just get an error.
Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang
whitefang3456 said:
Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry to side track a little bit, can you play candy crush on this rom? I tried, but no success in all mode.
whitefang3456 said:
Beast here
ROM: ***FeraLab*** v24 Voltage ~Phoenix~
Kernel: ferakernel v5.3GB
Frequency: not maxed, 1.14GHz
Mode: Ultra Gaming Mode in game booster
Governor: performance
Great flow~
Whitefang
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omg! How did you get that high 3D score?
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
anguslaw said:
sorry to side track a little bit, can you play candy crush on this rom? I tried, but no success in all mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did able to play..did u messed up somehow?
View attachment 1853701
Whitefang
jai554 said:
Omg! How did you get that high 3D score?
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha ya should ask senior FeraVolt, I have no idea in theory yet hehe. Sorry XP
Whitefang
I am using firekat ROM with the KT kernel, and I am stable at 2918 MHZ. I wanted to get a general representation of different speeds whether it be stock touchwiz or rooted and OC'd like mine. I really don't know what the best benchmarks are, so here's some numbers.
I achieved 1842 on Vellamo metal test.
1777 on Vellamo multicore test.
3480 on Chrome Vellamo browser test.
1104 on geekbench 3 single core.
3209 on geekbench 3 multicore
And more to come.
Sorry I am a noob on XDA and do not know how to attach screenshots.
Just to note (no pun intended), 2918 MHZ is the most stable OC I achieved. When I set to 3072 MHZ, my device overheats and reboots.
Sent from my SM-N910T
This phone is a beast. Why would you want to overclock it?
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Premium HD app
So here is a quick update, and my point is proven. I am running CM 12 builds now on my N4. CM can run toe to toe with Firekat, but firekat destroys CM in mulithreaded benchmarks.
CM does have bugs and broken things but, it is still faster than TW. To add to CM's defense, I'm running a base clock instead of OC'ed on firekat.
That being said, here are my benchmarks
Vellamo metal: 1856
Vellamo multicore: 1419
Vellamo browser ( Chrome ): 4051
And more to come.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
i don't care about Benkmark
betrayed sansung
I've ditched Samsung this time for Huawei Ascend Mate 7
Just to tease.. default Rom: Chrome 3700 .. Multicore 1800 .. Metal only 1333.
Pretty good for a 6 inch screen, damn low price, hardware fingerprint scanner, metal frame phablet, slimmer than Note 4
Completely stock
Browser : 3683
Metal:1783
Multicore:1918
Not as high as I was expecting. I'm running FireKat with AEL kernel over clocked to 2.89Ghz, umbrella_core governor, I/O set to ROW, read ahead size is 1024, I left the voltages alone. My phone scored lower than a non modified Note 4!
Benchmarks are stupid and pointless anyways, but it's still interesting to run them. The real world performance with my phone is outstanding, so I'm happy.
I am wondering why my scores are so low. Especially in the cpu and ram department. Could it be a faulty device?
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ----------
Just a side note this is completely stock. No root and no overclock. It this a corect score? Is antu comparing to other rooted devices.
jonahtriangle said:
I am wondering why my scores are so low. Especially in the cpu and ram department. Could it be a faulty device?
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ----------
Just a side note this is completely stock. No root and no overclock. It this a corect score? Is antu comparing to other rooted devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about what I got stock. As long as your device performs well in the real world then that's all that counts. Benchmarks don't mean squat.
On another note, here's my latest benchmark done in the freezer to avoid thermal throttling. My phone is so beastly that Antutu couldn't verify it.
When I removed it from my freezer the CPU temps were around 25° C, so there shouldn't have been any thermal throttling going on.
Benkmark is so fiction
not carre about it
Here's my latest
Firekat v11
projectvomit said:
Firekat v11
View attachment 3223827
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine was on FireKat v11 as well
New benchmark with Vision X Lollipop, KT kernel, performance governor, and tested outside to keep the phone cool (25°F right now).
Stock - AnTuTu - 49591
Here is mine completely stock. I am with GCI In Alaska. Left is encrypted and right is not. Nothing running or installed. Everything updated.
Hope this helps.
stomped the G3 before and after encryption.
Slie said:
Here is mine completely stock. I am with GCI In Alaska. Left is encrypted and right is not. Nothing running or installed. Everything updated.
Hope this helps.
stomped the G3 before and after encryption.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops looks like photo didn't attach.
Mine
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
Hi all xda! I am using Gustavo_s kernel for a long time. And If you don't like stock kernel values then read this thread.
What you need:
1. A GT-I9100
2. Gustavo_s kernel,
3. Synapse (from play store)
4. Devil kernel manager (from play store)
5. A little courage
Gustavo_s kernel is a feature rich kernel but some says it is not stable [I was agree with them since chrome beta update (because chrome freezes phone only on this and all fuse bug fixed kernels)]. Here is my settings for best battery life and performance balaced! Leave unchanged I don't write any setting here.
A. Devil kernel manager settings:
CPU settings:
idle mode: idle+lpa
B. Synapse settings
1. Cpu settings
Cpu max: 1GHz
Voltage
1GHz: 1075mV
800MHz: 1000mV
500MHz: 950mV
200MHz: 850mV
2. Gpu settings
4x MSAA: CHECK
GPU 4th step freq: 400 MHz
Voltage
1st: 800mV
2nd: 850mV
3rd: 950mV
4th: 1150mV
3. Colors
If you are complaining about washed up colors or yellow tint display look at my other thread here
Yellow tint fix
4. Sound
i9100 Microphone is too silent. Boost it by 20dB
5. BLN
Force disable: CHECK
Led voltage: 2500mV
6. I/O
internal and external storage settings;
sio
1024kb
7. TWEAKS
All 650mA
8. MISC
Uncheck logcat if you don't use it.
If this settings are helpful for you please hit thanks button
Interesting thread. Good tweaks though. Please make sure to advise people that the voltages you applied will not work with all people's phones, but in most cases it should be fine.
gsstudios said:
Interesting thread. Good tweaks though. Please make sure to advise people that the voltages you applied will not work with all people's phones, but in most cases it should be fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I usally use -25mV more undervolted but this values are safe and smooth
Can I ask what ROM you are currently using?
RuffBuster said:
Can I ask what ROM you are currently using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm11 linaro sabermod
Thnx for awesome setting..:thumbup:
---------- Post added at 09:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 PM ----------
But gallery is not open when I check 4x MSAA..??
Did you ever got the phone freezed with these settings (apart from Chrome's bad behaviour)?
vickymbbs said:
Thnx for awesome setting..:thumbup:
---------- Post added at 09:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 PM ----------
But gallery is not open when I check 4x MSAA..??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When msaa x4 is enabled, the GPU would have to work harder to render the visuals whether it is an app or a game. Some apps are not compatible with this option is ticked and that's why it is disabled by default.
thks, I will try
nhmanas said:
Gustavo_s kernel is a feature rich kernel but some says it is not stable [I was agree with them since chrome beta update (because chrome freezes phone only on this and all fuse bug fixed kernels)].
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't understand. you say chrome beta freezes the complete phone on fpbug fixed kernels? and not on others? how does this happen? can you elaborate?
Lanchon said:
i don't understand. you say chrome beta freezes the complete phone on fpbug fixed kernels? and not on others? how does this happen? can you elaborate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was a long time ago mate. I wrote almost same thing on your fpbug fix thread too if you remember
-zalo said:
THANXS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't quote unnecessary long posts.. You can just mention me.
Hey everyone! To further help old/new users of these forums understand why and how their phones can perform better or worse than some, post your AVS groups which you can find in the Info section (avs summary sub section) of the Synapse app. Here s mine...
aldoblaga said:
Hey everyone! To further help old/new users of these forums understand why and how their phones can perform better or worse than some, post your AVS groups which you can find in the Info section (avs summary sub section) of the Synapse app. Here s mine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here's mine.... not sure what it all means
edwardob said:
here's mine.... not sure what it all means
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much for posting! Well it means some people (with higher AVS groups) can possibly overclock/undervolt better than others. For example i can apply a -75mv undervolt to all the frequencies and achieve perfect stability. Also i can overclock to the full 2.4ghz and it will reflect in everything from geekbench to antutu scores and all this while maintaining the same stock coolness of the phone and battery performance.
I m curious to see if there s anybody here with an AVS group of 10 or above and see how well they can overclock/undervolt and generally speaking perform as far as scores and battery life goes.
For example this is how far i could push with perfect stability this phone while undervolted @ -75mv - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=63589738
Also the battery performance i got with 2.4ghz a57 cores and 852mhz gpu clock - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=63750002
And with 1.3ghz a57 speed/420mhz gpu speed - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=63851201
Mine is 12 12 12 12 13 12
alexander1995 said:
Mine is 12 12 12 12 13 12
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG OMG! I WANT YOUR PHONE! ) will you exchange it for mine?
Anyway, joke aside..can you try and see how far you can undervolt/overclock and maybe some benchmarks (antutu and geekbench should be fine) and then a battery life test ?
Thanks in advance man and congrats for an awesome device!
However, it doesn't make any difference except the lower temperature. The power drain of this N920I is similar to another Note5 Which is N9200 with 7 7 7 7 8 7 avs profile. And the score of N920I which can reach 67xxx-68xxx is just a little bit higher than the one of N9200 Which is within 65xxx-67xxx
---------- Post added at 07:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:25 AM ----------
I don't think it can undervolt too much. I use arter97 kernel and just undervolt 37.5mv. Haven't tried other volt
aldoblaga said:
Hey everyone! To further help old/new users of these forums understand why and how their phones can perform better or worse than some, post your AVS groups which you can find in the Info section (avs summary sub section) of the Synapse app. Here s mine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where do you find "Info" in Synapse? The only choices I have are: A57 Cluster, A53 Cluster, GPU, and Busses. I'm on Arter kernel...
First root ur device, then use an app call Root Explorer to check out /sys/kernel/debug/avs summary.
---------- Post added at 06:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:25 PM ----------
ElQuixote said:
Where do you find "Info" in Synapse? The only choices I have are: A57 Cluster, A53 Cluster, GPU, and Busses. I'm on Arter kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First root ur device, then use an app call Root Explorer to check out /sys/kernel/debug/avs summary.
alexander1995 said:
However, it doesn't make any difference except the lower temperature. The power drain of this N920I is similar to another Note5 Which is N9200 with 7 7 7 7 8 7 avs profile. And the score of N920I which can reach 67xxx-68xxx is just a little bit higher than the one of N9200 Which is within 65xxx-67xxx
---------- Post added at 07:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:25 AM ----------
I don't think it can undervolt too much. I use arter97 kernel and just undervolt 37.5mv. Haven't tried other volt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dunno man...i got.these.scores with a57 cores pumped at 2.4ghz both min and max... The battery score.is innacurate as i was already using the phone for an hour before starting the test..so it should have read like 10hrs and 41mins...
Avs 8 here?
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk
My asv_summary reads
big:10, LITTLE:10, INT:10, MIF:8, G3D:10, ISP:10
I've been having pretty decent success with overclocking (1.5 and 2.4 GHz) and significant undervolting (-50 mV). I could undervolt less, but I was getting some issues (freezes, rebooting) so I'm happy with where it's at now.
aldoblaga said:
I dunno man...i got.these.scores with a57 cores pumped at 2.4ghz both min and max... The battery score.is innacurate as i was already using the phone for an hour before starting the test..so it should have read like 10hrs and 41mins...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stock clock & fixed max freq
alexander1995 said:
stock clock & fixed max freq
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed max freq @ 2.1 or what value exactly? Good score anyway
alexander1995 said:
stock clock & fixed max freq
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What benchmark is taht?
aldoblaga said:
Fixed max freq @ 2.1 or what value exactly? Good score anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. I didn't oc but uv using arter97 kernel.
---------- Post added at 04:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:50 PM ----------
Willyman said:
What benchmark is taht?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PCMark. Developed by Futuremark.
I've only made small changes like I described, no fixed max frequencies for example. I get a Work score of 5700, so slightly higher than stock. I will say the Gundal Kernel makes the phone run notably smoother.
By the way, doesn't fixing the clock speed kill the battery life or make it run very hot? Surely you only do that for the benchmark right?
Willyman said:
By the way, doesn't fixing the clock speed kill the battery life or make it run very hot? Surely you only do that for the benchmark right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course
aldoblaga said:
Fixed max freq @ 2.1 or what value exactly? Good score anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clean up the background apps and I got this
alexander1995 said:
Clean up the background apps and I got this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome man! Try these other tests out and let s see how.they compare...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=63903775