Database Users

Quadrant benchmarks

Can someone explain exactly what it really means?
I know the higher the number the better your phone is working but beyond that i have no clue
I consistently get 2080 to 2250 on cm7 nightly 30 running ondemand governor min 368 max 1.3ghz. Im assuming thats respectable?
I ran it once on performance governor at 1.5ghz and got about 2500 on benchmark.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2

This is the best score out of a series of three I ran right after flashing Cm6.1.1 and cranking setcpu up to max. I'm sure that this would run perfectly well at these speeds for day to day on his kernel, but I usually only run at around 1113mhz. The g2 is plenty fast on its stock 800mhz with fantastic battery life, don't get me wrong. But what the hell is the point of all this rooting and rom flashing wagoonery if I don't give myself a slight performance bump.
*Epenis waving*

At 1.5ghz max and 368 min (on-demand governor) with CM7 and Pershoot's latest kernel (I believe he incorporated the new GPU drivers), I get 2700-2800. Quadrant tests your CPU, memory, and GPU performance.
As for Quadrant I tend to find it unreliable, for benchmarks I use Smartbench 2011. Seems a bit more reasonable. Makes you realize how underpowered our GPU's is compared to the PowerVR SGX540.

And what is the gpu?
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2

tackleberry said:
And what is the gpu?
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPU = Graphical processor unit
its the chip in the phone that draws polygons and renders graphics so games and graphic related things run smoothly

Thanks for that info, that's what I was thinking but wasn't positive.
I tried it on smartbench 2011 and got about a 1500.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2

tackleberry said:
Thanks for that info, that's what I was thinking but wasn't positive.
I tried it on smartbench 2011 and got about a 1500.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got 1500 for what specifically?
Smartbench 2011 outputs 2 bars after the test. One for Productivity Index (CPU performance) and another for Gaming Index (GPU performance). Top bar is Productivity Index and bottom bar is Gaming Index.

from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.

sodvs said:
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so what kernel you're using???...
Now I just got a 2301pt at 1.5Gperformance in Quadrant Advanced

sodvs said:
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow the Smartbench 2011 results for Liquid Villain are impressive. Might have to give that rom a try.

I think it might I been a fluke lol the cloest I got that again 1600/2400ish.
On all the screen shoots I was using pershoots kernal
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App

If u want to go big use flippys turbo kernel. A phone as fast as u want, lol.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

I have used flippy's kernal and oc'ed to 1.9 and got 2997 on quandrant but smartbench score was 1900ish productivity/ 1700ish gaming...phone got a bit hot as well...with pershoots kernal I can get almost the same results and phone stays at normal temp.

I got 3158 on quadrant running CM7rc2 with pershoots .34 kernel. Oc'd to 1516 with performance governor.
Currently on CM7rc3 with pershoots .36 kernel I'm getting high 2900's.
All I know is ›3000 on quadrant is FAST!
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

How do I get pershoot's latest kernel?

just over 3200+ on quadrant running the latest CM7 nightly and setting [email protected]
for quadrant, i have noticed its important to run it several times before you get an accurate measurement... personally, i've had the best score around the 3rd or 4th run.... anything more after that just plateau the score or even dips a bit at times. and kill heavy background services (ie: f/b, lookout, juice defender, DSP manager)
FYI: if i set CPU back to stock, i'm still @ 2700ish

Quadrant hasn't been updated for a long time and it is not exactly reliable when it comes to evaluating a phone's performance. You're much better off with Antutu Benchmark.
And this is almost a year old of a post

crestofawave said:
Quadrant hasn't been updated for a long time and it is not exactly reliable when it comes to evaluating a phone's performance. You're much better off with Antutu Benchmark.
And this is almost a year old of a post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Post Your Galaxy Note Quadrant Score Here..!!

Here is Mine.... 4434 on Stock FW....
STOCK 2.3.6
XXKL3
PLEASE SHARE YOUR ROM AND KERNEL VERSIONS WITH QUADRANT STANDARD SCORE.
[14-02-2012] Edit : Quadrant standard now Updated to new version with dual core support.
Download from Market

That seems like a good stock score, I was getting anywhere between 3600-4400 on stock, but my highest score is around 5000 when overclocked. Quadrant may aswel just be a random number though, that's how useless it is.

I am on stock and consistently around 4,000.

Mine is a 4414 on a custom rom.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

4472 with stock KL7 @1,6 via tegrak

5885
Rocket ROM V12 with Abyss 2.6, 1.7GHz

I have gotten as high as over 4500 and as low as around 3300.My scores tend to vary quite substantially.
Most are around 3800.
In power saving mode,i only get around 2600.

Croak said:
5885
Rocket ROM V12 with Abyss 2.6, 1.7GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am gonna try ROM V12. Now I have Darkynote with a score of 3800.

Croak said:
5885
Rocket ROM V12 with Abyss 2.6, 1.7GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you run your note at that speed constantly, or just for benchmarking? I'm just wondering how safe and reliable a 300mhz overclock is.

I used Antutu because it compares my phone with other comparable phones and not just phone near extinct phones

i also used Antutu and my score is lower by hundreds than the original firmware when it was shipped which was KK1.

Here my score-
I love my note but i am very upset Note is having 800MB ram & S2 is having 1gb RAM
Firmware XXLA3 (STOCK)
KERNEL- 2.6.35.7-N7000XXLA3-CL880036
TWEAK- TEGRAK OVERCLOCK ULTIMATE

maniacscorpio said:
Here my score-
I love my note but i am very upset Note is having 800MB ram & S2 is having 1gb RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But, the Note does have 1GB of RAM. It probably just shows it as 800MB because of system processes or something.
Also, for those who posted scores, I think it would be helpful to post your firmware, ROM, kernel, and any overclocks/settings you may have applied.

k1ng617 said:
But, the Note does have 1GB of RAM. It probably just shows it as 800MB because of system processes or something.
Also, for those who posted scores, I think it would be helpful to post your firmware, ROM, kernel, and any overclocks/settings you may have applied.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then why S2 shows 0.98gb of ram instead of 800mb.......

my score 5638

maniacscorpio said:
then why S2 shows 0.98gb of ram instead of 800mb.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, i have no idea. But I'm sure the Note has 1gb of RAM

maniacscorpio said:
then why S2 shows 0.98gb of ram instead of 800mb.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 800mb is what is avail to you for handling your activities, while the remaining 200mb is probably hidden for the phone to handle essential functions (i think). Besides, Antutu shows 1gb of RAM during the testing
---------- Post added at 04:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:43 PM ----------
I also had the same problem so what I did was clear ram, restarted then ran the test

Ive only rooted, and this is what i got.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

FerretAD said:
View attachment 861697
Ive only rooted, and this is what i got.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try again and again you ll get score around 4000+

Please share your rom and kernel versions with quadrant standard score.

Low Stock Quadrant Scores

I'm getting pretty frustrated with my nexus 7 because I'm getting horribly low Quadrant scores. I tried messing around and putting custom kernels on it but when I compared the scores to the thread I was reading, I couldn't even get the stock scores mentioned in the thread with a overclocked custom kernel.
I'm getting a total of 3412 on my Nexus 7 on my stock kernel on the stock rooted/unlocked bootloader 4.2.1. I wiped the device, reinstalled the 4.2.1 stock backup, and then installed quadrant and ran it so there shouldn't be background processes problems. This pisses me off because on the Jay's Buttery Tweaks, he got 4875 on his stock kernel/stock ROM. Somethings wrong there. What would cause such a horrible score?

The first thing you need to know about quadrant scores is................they are decieving, and usually bloated. If your N7 preforms well during use, then your good. Also, if they were that important, all rom and kernel developers would post them with their releases. They dont for a reason.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

snowman4839 said:
I'm getting pretty frustrated with my nexus 7 because I'm getting horribly low Quadrant scores. I tried messing around and putting custom kernels on it but when I compared the scores to the thread I was reading, I couldn't even get the stock scores mentioned in the thread with a overclocked custom kernel.
I'm getting a total of 3412 on my Nexus 7 on my stock kernel on the stock rooted/unlocked bootloader 4.2.1. I wiped the device, reinstalled the 4.2.1 stock backup, and then installed quadrant and ran it so there shouldn't be background processes problems. This pisses me off because on the Jay's Buttery Tweaks, he got 4875 on his stock kernel/stock ROM. Somethings wrong there. What would cause such a horrible score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, who cares? Is your nexus laggy? Are you having trouble doing what you want to do? If not then screw it, you're fine. Why is everyone obsessed with idiotic scores and benchmarks? The girls won't sleep with you cuz your Quadrant was over 9000!

Quadrant has never given the Tegra3 Chip really good scores for some reason? Almost all other benchmarking apps like Antutu, CFBench, Vellemo, Smart-bench, and many others will give 3 phones that I have, that are very close in specs a much closer comparison. I don't know why it is but Quadrant has never benched any of my Tegra3 devices high.
And was stated above go by how it feels in real life usage, is it snappy and smooth don't go specifically by benchmarks all the time they can sometimes give you an idea, but they are not tell you real world usage. For example my moms Samsung Transform Ultra with Android 2.3 and a 1GHz single-core Snapdragon is still really snappy. Its hard to believe that it is almost as fast as some of my quad core newer devices.

I got 2883 on my bone stock while playing the walking dead...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Why do you care about benchmark scores? They really really don't matter. What matters is how it performs during usage. Nothing else. You can have awesome scores, yet have the device lag during normal use.
From a Nexus S bathing in Jelly Beans

Alright well that was with the motley kernel and I'm not sure what was up but it felt pretty smooth with the motley kernel but gave me those terrible scores. Performance in GTA3 was a decent amount better than stock.
Then I restored the stock rom and installed M kernel and trickster Mod and after that because the benchmarks were just pissing me off. Overclocked to 1.6Ghz and did some SD modifications and jesus christ everything is buttery smooth, fast loading, gta3 runs awesome, and I can get a like 6200 score in quadrant and 15397 on AnTuTu. Probably the fastest anrdoid device I've ever used.
I just confuses the crap out of me because I get pretty crappy graphics scores and changing the GPU clock and raising the GPU voltage doesn't change the GPU score on either benchmark.
Can someone tell me what the LP core is and why my GPU scores won't change?

I disagree, respectfully of course. Benchmarks like the Quadrant are useful standard tools to measure the performance of these devices. While they are not perfect, they point out potential weaknesses in our phones and tablets and whatnot.
Compared to stock Nexus 7, the iPad mini runs much more smoothly and yet is underpowered spec-wise. Still the mini puts up a better benchmark score than the superior N7.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

quadrant doesn't matter, but it can be useful for developers or just for the fun of it. first off, most people don't bench correctly. you want the CPU to be at the highest CPU speed at all times, quadrant doesn't put enough stress on the device to allow that, so the CPU will scale. if it scales, you don't know the actual CPU speed that its testing. you want to set the CPU speed at the highest speed, and you want to set the lowest CPU speed as the highest speed also. also, for higher scores, you'd need to disable fsync, and turn off tegra hot plug(and enable all four cores). sdcard tweaks wont help you, neither will jays buttery tweaks. also, overclocking the GPU wont help since we are limited in fps.
---------- Post added at 03:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:10 PM ----------
jamesc760 said:
I disagree, respectfully of course. Benchmarks like the Quadrant are useful standard tools to measure the performance of these devices. While they are not perfect, they point out potential weaknesses in our phones and tablets and whatnot.
Compared to stock Nexus 7, the iPad mini runs much more smoothly and yet is underpowered spec-wise. Still the mini puts up a better benchmark score than the superior N7.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where does the iPad mini show better benchmarks?

Well I've tried like 4 or 5 different kernels and m-kernel is the best. Only one that can score 15,000 on Antutu.
Can anyone riddle me why no matter what I change the gpu max frequency or voltages to, my 2d and 3d graphics are always the same?

snowman4839 said:
Well I've tried like 4 or 5 different kernels and m-kernel is the best. Only one that can score 15,000 on Antutu.
Can anyone riddle me why no matter what I change the gpu max frequency or voltages to, my 2d and 3d graphics are always the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
those benchmarks arent gpu benchmarks, especially quadrant. we are limited to 59/60 fps no matter what gpu you use. for gpu try basemark es2.0 taiji, gpu mark, or the windmill benchmark.
trinity kernel quadrant and antutu..

Jesus christ. Those are great results. What settings are you using? I installed trinity on a fresh restore of 4.2.1 and used Trickster Mod and System Tuner to set it to 1.7Ghz, performance, deadline, 1024 cache, zRAM enabled, fsync disabled, with stock voltages but I got barely over 5000.
I'm getting 6135 on the beefed up M-kernel. You get a decent amount higher in CPU, memory, and I/O, but your 2D score triples mine. 3D is the same.

snowman4839 said:
Jesus christ. Those are great results. What settings are you using? I installed trinity on a fresh restore of 4.2.1 and used Trickster Mod and System Tuner to set it to 1.7Ghz, performance, deadline, 1024 cache, zRAM enabled, fsync disabled, with stock voltages but I got barely over 5000.
I'm getting 6135 on the beefed up M-kernel. You get a decent amount higher in CPU, memory, and I/O, but your 2D score triples mine. 3D is the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bench at 1700mhz high/1700mhz low. turn off tegra hotplug and enable all 4 cores(i dont know if trickster has that option, trinity kernel toolbox does), turn off fsync. trinity doent include zram, so you couldnt of used it. zram has nothing to do for performance anyways and doesnt help you with anything else. zram gives a little more ram for devices that are low ram to begin with. the n7 isnt low ram. plus, with zram, itll get slower after a few hours after bootup. i use ondemand/deadline btw. and, go into the devices main settings, developer options, and enable force gpu rendering. that raise your 2d score. i also bet that you are getting caught in the thermal throttle, which lowers your cpu speed when your device gets hot.

alright cool thanks for the info. I'll add in those settings minus the hotplug fix andsee what that does when I get.back. I know thermal throttling lowers scores. I've been doing tests recently on a bag of ice. the cpu stays plenty cool

snowman4839 said:
I'm getting pretty frustrated with my nexus 7 because I'm getting horribly low Quadrant scores. I tried messing around and putting custom kernels on it but when I compared the scores to the thread I was reading, I couldn't even get the stock scores mentioned in the thread with a overclocked custom kernel.
I'm getting a total of 3412 on my Nexus 7 on my stock kernel on the stock rooted/unlocked bootloader 4.2.1. I wiped the device, reinstalled the 4.2.1 stock backup, and then installed quadrant and ran it so there shouldn't be background processes problems. This pisses me off because on the Jay's Buttery Tweaks, he got 4875 on his stock kernel/stock ROM. Somethings wrong there. What would cause such a horrible score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW 3412 QS... Then if I show you this you will be pissed.
Full untouched Stock FL04 JB 4.1.2 SGSII E4GT. QS 4348
Quadrant Score are not important. If it performs well who cares about a QS.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Omar04 said:
WOW 3412 QS... Then if I show you this you will be pissed.
Full untouched Stock FL04 JB 4.1.2 SGSII E4GT. QS 4348
Quadrant Score are not important. If it performs well who cares about a QS.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edited to delete comment as I was an idiot and did not read the above post fully before I opened my trap.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

jamesc760 said:
I disagree, respectfully of course. Benchmarks like the Quadrant are useful standard tools to measure the performance of these devices. While they are not perfect, they point out potential weaknesses in our phones and tablets and whatnot.
Compared to stock Nexus 7, the iPad mini runs much more smoothly and yet is underpowered spec-wise. Still the mini puts up a better benchmark score than the superior N7.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree with that. Just by clearing up RAM and turning off Processes that were not being used just sitting in RAM, maybe 30 or 40MB, waiting to be used my score went up over 200 points. If the benchmark was accurate then that would not have actually made any difference as it would have cleared out any unused processes itself before running.
---------- Post added at 01:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:34 PM ----------
snowman4839 said:
Jesus christ. Those are great results. What settings are you using? I installed trinity on a fresh restore of 4.2.1 and used Trickster Mod and System Tuner to set it to 1.7Ghz, performance, deadline, 1024 cache, zRAM enabled, fsync disabled, with stock voltages but I got barely over 5000.
I'm getting 6135 on the beefed up M-kernel. You get a decent amount higher in CPU, memory, and I/O, but your 2D score triples mine. 3D is the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. Really? Ive gotten 5900 with just 1.4GHz, GPU 2d rendering and clearing out some RAM, fsync disabled running M-Kernel a23.

Nexus benchmark

Hello.this is my antutu result.please share opinion and screenshots.i use cm10 stable with marmite kernel.
Whats your score?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?

Serris said:
My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep i used oc 1400.I just flashed jellyshot with mermite kernel with 1.32 OC and smartass and got this

First two screens are result for cm-10.1-20130408-NIGHTLY rom with cm kernel.
The 3rd and 4th screenshot were made after updating to 20130416-NIGHTLY and flashing mermite-v8.5cm kernel.

Carbon ROM, no over clock and stock
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

Over clocked 1300 Carbon ROM
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config

B33zal said:
Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On general (my experience) 3200-4000 is pretty normal without overclocking depending on rom/kernel/phone/battery level and temperature.. Two identical phones with the same set up will get different scores. Some mods/tweaks can increase this as well as having a good amount of free ram and no other programs running.
But these are just "fun" tests and not a true assessment of real performance..
With that said, Carbon rom is SOOOO much faster..

Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^

B33zal said:
Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed... And it is fun mopping the floor with slow ROMs (joking)...
This was set at only 800 mhz
Consider yourselves challenged..
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

burakgon said:
Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No matter what rom I've tried, I don't get much over 2k on 3d.. this test I was just a bit under, but still damn good for a Nexus S.. I saw you are trying to improve the graphics in your rom, I hope it works, but I really want a faster load time on apps and less lag in everything else. I have tried your rom, on this test as well, and you came up over 500 points below my score of 5300. I test all roms the same with multiple kernels (stock included as well) and different schedulers/ governors.. but as battery life goes you are towards the top..

Antutu benchmark

What is the Best antutu score for note 5
Here is my test score

That's really good; I got 65469
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Don't you have anything installed? I got 45k, all apps closed and bootmanager in action to prevent unwanted apps to startup on boot!

I don't have root just used clean master and greenify app
First run I got 70430

i got 74000+, but you should use PCMARK, as it test the more in more scenarios and kinda replicates your daily usage.
I got enormus score.

how s this? running darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.1 undervolted by -100mv and overclocked to 2.4 a57 cores and 852mhz gpu.

That's good I mean very good

Hi,
arter97 lastest beta kernel with Interactive governor tweaked a bit for better performance (enforced_mode set to 1, min_sample_time, go_hispeed_load and hispeed_freq tweaked) and some VM tweaks (dirty_ratio, dirty_background_ratio, dirty_expire_centisecs, dirty_writeback_centisecs and swapiness), no undervolt.
CPU temp at 25 °C at the beginning...

SkyHigh 2.7 kernel, some tweaks like above without overclock / underclock:
I use the previous Antutu version to compare with my other scores when I test some tweaks (as a baseline), it would be time to update Antutu now

My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.

m4gg0t said:
My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got this using darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.7

Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.

m4gg0t said:
Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as you can see..there are real benefits ) not to mention better battery life and all around usage speed, fluidity...but hey, everybody uses their phone as they want. i m a poweruser...

i have 84089
n920c

junior00027 said:
i have 84089
n920c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the usual score @ stock rom, kernel is anything from 80.000 to 85.000 so you re perfectly stock with the score

Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk

My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk

haree87 said:
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kickoff said:
View attachment 3582674
My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys i m sorry to ruin your parade...but any score in red is not a valid one...sorry. When you will get a green score, post that. I could never get above 100.000 green score (max was around 97-98.000 with skyhigh kernel)..the only kernel that gets me over 110.000 is arter kernel and that is known already to have a bug in the UX Section that causes that big score...

score

Every time I'm getting around 80k on stock, which is slightly low i think.
When comparing the stats to the Note 5 at the ranking table its all the same with exception of the 3d score (garden) with my device always getting around 8.3k compared to 12.112 from Note 5 result from the ranking table.
Why do you think my 3d score is low?
Also I don't know if it's related but I have some sort of lag when scrolling through Facebook, YouTube etc...