Database Users

Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored 4171! Beat stock I9100's Score!

Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171

The picture redirects to another picture. If you want to do sth, do it correctly... ffs What's the number? I've scored 4004 on stock i9100...

update already.. sorry for the mistake image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!

updated already.. sorry for the mistaked image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!

Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

MS. said:
Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...

well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.

rauschkugl said:
well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you saying stupid? then you how to measure the performance on one phone... you think u is god can measure yourself? Please be manner while using your word.. TQ

well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.

All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

donmarkon said:
All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your one already modded bro... see your battery icon also know... =.=

Can I be noob too?

rauschkugl said:
well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, i know that is different score on Quadrant... but let say why old Android phone like one year ago Xperia x10 always got lower score than samsung s2? tat y in fact samsung S2 is powerful than before phone... If you think this is Stupid thread, why not you just ignore and keep your mouth shut.. and please be manner while using word... what the religion you have? so rude are you!

TheSaw said:
Can I be noob too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you hiding a meaning behind?

i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?

rauschkugl said:
i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, please provide your Evidence brother thank you because be manner

these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.

rauschkugl said:
these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okok. Bro.. so, do you plan to move to Galaxy Note? or waiting New Galaxy S3?

serge327 said:
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope your happy with your dev community
Sent from my GT-I9100

serge327 said:
Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first of all, you are using a wrong benchmark to test. secondly, you are not comparing apple to apple. what i meant was your G version is most likely running on update3 source code. when i flash a kernel with update3 source code, my stock rom is able to hit more than 4300+

Low Stock Quadrant Scores

I'm getting pretty frustrated with my nexus 7 because I'm getting horribly low Quadrant scores. I tried messing around and putting custom kernels on it but when I compared the scores to the thread I was reading, I couldn't even get the stock scores mentioned in the thread with a overclocked custom kernel.
I'm getting a total of 3412 on my Nexus 7 on my stock kernel on the stock rooted/unlocked bootloader 4.2.1. I wiped the device, reinstalled the 4.2.1 stock backup, and then installed quadrant and ran it so there shouldn't be background processes problems. This pisses me off because on the Jay's Buttery Tweaks, he got 4875 on his stock kernel/stock ROM. Somethings wrong there. What would cause such a horrible score?

The first thing you need to know about quadrant scores is................they are decieving, and usually bloated. If your N7 preforms well during use, then your good. Also, if they were that important, all rom and kernel developers would post them with their releases. They dont for a reason.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

snowman4839 said:
I'm getting pretty frustrated with my nexus 7 because I'm getting horribly low Quadrant scores. I tried messing around and putting custom kernels on it but when I compared the scores to the thread I was reading, I couldn't even get the stock scores mentioned in the thread with a overclocked custom kernel.
I'm getting a total of 3412 on my Nexus 7 on my stock kernel on the stock rooted/unlocked bootloader 4.2.1. I wiped the device, reinstalled the 4.2.1 stock backup, and then installed quadrant and ran it so there shouldn't be background processes problems. This pisses me off because on the Jay's Buttery Tweaks, he got 4875 on his stock kernel/stock ROM. Somethings wrong there. What would cause such a horrible score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, who cares? Is your nexus laggy? Are you having trouble doing what you want to do? If not then screw it, you're fine. Why is everyone obsessed with idiotic scores and benchmarks? The girls won't sleep with you cuz your Quadrant was over 9000!

Quadrant has never given the Tegra3 Chip really good scores for some reason? Almost all other benchmarking apps like Antutu, CFBench, Vellemo, Smart-bench, and many others will give 3 phones that I have, that are very close in specs a much closer comparison. I don't know why it is but Quadrant has never benched any of my Tegra3 devices high.
And was stated above go by how it feels in real life usage, is it snappy and smooth don't go specifically by benchmarks all the time they can sometimes give you an idea, but they are not tell you real world usage. For example my moms Samsung Transform Ultra with Android 2.3 and a 1GHz single-core Snapdragon is still really snappy. Its hard to believe that it is almost as fast as some of my quad core newer devices.

I got 2883 on my bone stock while playing the walking dead...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Why do you care about benchmark scores? They really really don't matter. What matters is how it performs during usage. Nothing else. You can have awesome scores, yet have the device lag during normal use.
From a Nexus S bathing in Jelly Beans

Alright well that was with the motley kernel and I'm not sure what was up but it felt pretty smooth with the motley kernel but gave me those terrible scores. Performance in GTA3 was a decent amount better than stock.
Then I restored the stock rom and installed M kernel and trickster Mod and after that because the benchmarks were just pissing me off. Overclocked to 1.6Ghz and did some SD modifications and jesus christ everything is buttery smooth, fast loading, gta3 runs awesome, and I can get a like 6200 score in quadrant and 15397 on AnTuTu. Probably the fastest anrdoid device I've ever used.
I just confuses the crap out of me because I get pretty crappy graphics scores and changing the GPU clock and raising the GPU voltage doesn't change the GPU score on either benchmark.
Can someone tell me what the LP core is and why my GPU scores won't change?

I disagree, respectfully of course. Benchmarks like the Quadrant are useful standard tools to measure the performance of these devices. While they are not perfect, they point out potential weaknesses in our phones and tablets and whatnot.
Compared to stock Nexus 7, the iPad mini runs much more smoothly and yet is underpowered spec-wise. Still the mini puts up a better benchmark score than the superior N7.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

quadrant doesn't matter, but it can be useful for developers or just for the fun of it. first off, most people don't bench correctly. you want the CPU to be at the highest CPU speed at all times, quadrant doesn't put enough stress on the device to allow that, so the CPU will scale. if it scales, you don't know the actual CPU speed that its testing. you want to set the CPU speed at the highest speed, and you want to set the lowest CPU speed as the highest speed also. also, for higher scores, you'd need to disable fsync, and turn off tegra hot plug(and enable all four cores). sdcard tweaks wont help you, neither will jays buttery tweaks. also, overclocking the GPU wont help since we are limited in fps.
---------- Post added at 03:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:10 PM ----------
jamesc760 said:
I disagree, respectfully of course. Benchmarks like the Quadrant are useful standard tools to measure the performance of these devices. While they are not perfect, they point out potential weaknesses in our phones and tablets and whatnot.
Compared to stock Nexus 7, the iPad mini runs much more smoothly and yet is underpowered spec-wise. Still the mini puts up a better benchmark score than the superior N7.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where does the iPad mini show better benchmarks?

Well I've tried like 4 or 5 different kernels and m-kernel is the best. Only one that can score 15,000 on Antutu.
Can anyone riddle me why no matter what I change the gpu max frequency or voltages to, my 2d and 3d graphics are always the same?

snowman4839 said:
Well I've tried like 4 or 5 different kernels and m-kernel is the best. Only one that can score 15,000 on Antutu.
Can anyone riddle me why no matter what I change the gpu max frequency or voltages to, my 2d and 3d graphics are always the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
those benchmarks arent gpu benchmarks, especially quadrant. we are limited to 59/60 fps no matter what gpu you use. for gpu try basemark es2.0 taiji, gpu mark, or the windmill benchmark.
trinity kernel quadrant and antutu..

Jesus christ. Those are great results. What settings are you using? I installed trinity on a fresh restore of 4.2.1 and used Trickster Mod and System Tuner to set it to 1.7Ghz, performance, deadline, 1024 cache, zRAM enabled, fsync disabled, with stock voltages but I got barely over 5000.
I'm getting 6135 on the beefed up M-kernel. You get a decent amount higher in CPU, memory, and I/O, but your 2D score triples mine. 3D is the same.

snowman4839 said:
Jesus christ. Those are great results. What settings are you using? I installed trinity on a fresh restore of 4.2.1 and used Trickster Mod and System Tuner to set it to 1.7Ghz, performance, deadline, 1024 cache, zRAM enabled, fsync disabled, with stock voltages but I got barely over 5000.
I'm getting 6135 on the beefed up M-kernel. You get a decent amount higher in CPU, memory, and I/O, but your 2D score triples mine. 3D is the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bench at 1700mhz high/1700mhz low. turn off tegra hotplug and enable all 4 cores(i dont know if trickster has that option, trinity kernel toolbox does), turn off fsync. trinity doent include zram, so you couldnt of used it. zram has nothing to do for performance anyways and doesnt help you with anything else. zram gives a little more ram for devices that are low ram to begin with. the n7 isnt low ram. plus, with zram, itll get slower after a few hours after bootup. i use ondemand/deadline btw. and, go into the devices main settings, developer options, and enable force gpu rendering. that raise your 2d score. i also bet that you are getting caught in the thermal throttle, which lowers your cpu speed when your device gets hot.

alright cool thanks for the info. I'll add in those settings minus the hotplug fix andsee what that does when I get.back. I know thermal throttling lowers scores. I've been doing tests recently on a bag of ice. the cpu stays plenty cool

snowman4839 said:
I'm getting pretty frustrated with my nexus 7 because I'm getting horribly low Quadrant scores. I tried messing around and putting custom kernels on it but when I compared the scores to the thread I was reading, I couldn't even get the stock scores mentioned in the thread with a overclocked custom kernel.
I'm getting a total of 3412 on my Nexus 7 on my stock kernel on the stock rooted/unlocked bootloader 4.2.1. I wiped the device, reinstalled the 4.2.1 stock backup, and then installed quadrant and ran it so there shouldn't be background processes problems. This pisses me off because on the Jay's Buttery Tweaks, he got 4875 on his stock kernel/stock ROM. Somethings wrong there. What would cause such a horrible score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW 3412 QS... Then if I show you this you will be pissed.
Full untouched Stock FL04 JB 4.1.2 SGSII E4GT. QS 4348
Quadrant Score are not important. If it performs well who cares about a QS.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Omar04 said:
WOW 3412 QS... Then if I show you this you will be pissed.
Full untouched Stock FL04 JB 4.1.2 SGSII E4GT. QS 4348
Quadrant Score are not important. If it performs well who cares about a QS.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edited to delete comment as I was an idiot and did not read the above post fully before I opened my trap.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

jamesc760 said:
I disagree, respectfully of course. Benchmarks like the Quadrant are useful standard tools to measure the performance of these devices. While they are not perfect, they point out potential weaknesses in our phones and tablets and whatnot.
Compared to stock Nexus 7, the iPad mini runs much more smoothly and yet is underpowered spec-wise. Still the mini puts up a better benchmark score than the superior N7.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree with that. Just by clearing up RAM and turning off Processes that were not being used just sitting in RAM, maybe 30 or 40MB, waiting to be used my score went up over 200 points. If the benchmark was accurate then that would not have actually made any difference as it would have cleared out any unused processes itself before running.
---------- Post added at 01:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:34 PM ----------
snowman4839 said:
Jesus christ. Those are great results. What settings are you using? I installed trinity on a fresh restore of 4.2.1 and used Trickster Mod and System Tuner to set it to 1.7Ghz, performance, deadline, 1024 cache, zRAM enabled, fsync disabled, with stock voltages but I got barely over 5000.
I'm getting 6135 on the beefed up M-kernel. You get a decent amount higher in CPU, memory, and I/O, but your 2D score triples mine. 3D is the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. Really? Ive gotten 5900 with just 1.4GHz, GPU 2d rendering and clearing out some RAM, fsync disabled running M-Kernel a23.

Note Edge Benchmarks

Here's a link to recent benchmarks for the Galaxy Note Edge:
http://www.androidheadlines.com/2014/11/samsung-galaxy-note-edge-perform-benchmarks.html

Couple of screen shots from my device's benchmark results.
It says it is 64bit but currently set to 32bit.☺

I had 49850 on my 915k after root cm and freezing a few apps
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app

dennis nai said:
I had 49850 on my 915k after root cm and freezing a few apps
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which apps?

knox,some google apps and some samsung apps

Antutu = 49771 (N915S)
This is from the stock before root. Now I am running SkyHigh rom. Will test again soon.

Please can some xda expert help us to bring this beast above the 55000 mark? I truly belive it can be done.
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app

Finally broke 50k!
SM-N915S
Antutu: 50480
SkyHigh Rom by UpInTheAir, Rooted, DVFS disabled
Can't wait until UpInTheAir has a working kernel for the 915S. Once I can properly overclock this beast I can easily see this device hitting 55k+

tospace2006 said:
Finally broke 50k!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine.... Don't have overclok!

jafangie said:
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haven't tried Antutu 5.5 yet I'll try to top yours

jafangie said:
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe still running no overclock as well: 51874
Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous in terms of score.
UpInTheAir just finished his kernel for 915S so finally time to get overclocking

tospace2006 said:
Hehe still running no overclock as well: 51874
Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous in terms of score.
UpInTheAir just finished his kernel for 915S so finally time to get overclocking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I was annoyed few minutes... But yes you 're right : Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous.... in the morning!
On waking, it is still better!
Have a nice day!
Seriously, I think that 53000 should be the maximum without overclocking...

jafangie said:
Hi,
I was annoyed few minutes... But yes you 're right : Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous.... in the morning!
On waking, it is still better!
Have a nice day!
Seriously, I think that 53000 should be the maximum without overclocking...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
53000 would be quite a challenge I believe. Here is my one last attempt with stock.
Getting closer to 53000 but I think an extra 800 points without OC will be a bit of a stretch.

tospace2006 said:
53000 would be quite a challenge I believe. Here is my one last attempt with stock.
Getting closer to 53000 but I think an extra 800 points without OC will be a bit of a stretch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!

jafangie said:
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am lucky if I can break 40,000! Nice scores.

jafangie said:
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been trying... can't beat that man good job. It's -10 so maybe I'll give it another go later. OC is being tricky and seems to be degrading performance than gaining atm...

CreekDirt said:
I am lucky if I can break 40,000! Nice scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM

UpInTheAir said:
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my first Snapdragon phone from Samsung. All of my previous versions were the Exynos builds since as far back as the S2. Stock unrooted it was around 38,000. Stock rooted it is only marginally better.

UpInTheAir said:
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4. I am observing this quite a bit after consecutive benchmarks.
5. My god even after debloating and freezing all unwanted proccesses the phone still requires 2GB or ram to run at all times and at max I only have less than 1GB of free ram. I feel like this is taking a hit on the scores too. My G3 I had it down to 1.3GB used RAM so effectively had about 1.7GB free at max. What could be taking up so much RAM at all times.
CreekDirt said:
This is my first Snapdragon phone from Samsung. All of my previous versions were the Exynos builds since as far back as the S2. Stock unrooted it was around 38,000. Stock rooted it is only marginally better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the G3 Cat.6 with SD805 and noticed very disappointing scores stock. The G3 also had very aggressive thermal throttling and the SD805 was a very hot running chip.
Once I got everything debloated and thermal turned off it hit almost 48,000.
I know that the S5 prime had better scores than the Cat.6 due to much better thermals and would expect the same out of the Note.
Try rooting and debloating your phone if you want to experiment and disable DVFS for better scores.
I also place my phone by an open window as it's -10 degrees Celsius now and low temp gives great boosts to your scores.

tospace2006 said:
4. I am observing this quite a bit after consecutive benchmarks.
5. My god even after debloating and freezing all unwanted proccesses the phone still requires 2GB or ram to run at all times and at max I only have less than 1GB of free ram. I feel like this is taking a hit on the scores too. My G3 I had it down to 1.3GB used RAM so effectively had about 1.7GB free at max. What could be taking up so much RAM at all times.
I had the G3 Cat.6 with SD805 and noticed very disappointing scores stock. The G3 also had very aggressive thermal throttling and the SD805 was a very hot running chip.
Once I got everything debloated and thermal turned off it hit almost 48,000.
I know that the S5 prime had better scores than the Cat.6 due to much better thermals and would expect the same out of the Note.
Try rooting and debloating your phone if you want to experiment and disable DVFS for better scores.
I also place my phone by an open window as it's -10 degrees Celsius now and low temp gives great boosts to your scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been rooted for almost a month now, but haven't gotten around to debloating since there isn't a need to. My phone flies. The only hesitation I see is if I actually use the menu key to see the task manager. Since I have the manager on my Edge bar I rarely even do that.
Debloating might be in my future just to see if I can finally reach that 6 hour screen on time. This phone has very few wake locks which has surprised me.

Benchmarks with your Note 4

I am using firekat ROM with the KT kernel, and I am stable at 2918 MHZ. I wanted to get a general representation of different speeds whether it be stock touchwiz or rooted and OC'd like mine. I really don't know what the best benchmarks are, so here's some numbers.
I achieved 1842 on Vellamo metal test.
1777 on Vellamo multicore test.
3480 on Chrome Vellamo browser test.
1104 on geekbench 3 single core.
3209 on geekbench 3 multicore
And more to come.
Sorry I am a noob on XDA and do not know how to attach screenshots.
Just to note (no pun intended), 2918 MHZ is the most stable OC I achieved. When I set to 3072 MHZ, my device overheats and reboots.
Sent from my SM-N910T

This phone is a beast. Why would you want to overclock it?
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Premium HD app

So here is a quick update, and my point is proven. I am running CM 12 builds now on my N4. CM can run toe to toe with Firekat, but firekat destroys CM in mulithreaded benchmarks.
CM does have bugs and broken things but, it is still faster than TW. To add to CM's defense, I'm running a base clock instead of OC'ed on firekat.
That being said, here are my benchmarks
Vellamo metal: 1856
Vellamo multicore: 1419
Vellamo browser ( Chrome ): 4051
And more to come.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app

i don't care about Benkmark

betrayed sansung
I've ditched Samsung this time for Huawei Ascend Mate 7
Just to tease.. default Rom: Chrome 3700 .. Multicore 1800 .. Metal only 1333.
Pretty good for a 6 inch screen, damn low price, hardware fingerprint scanner, metal frame phablet, slimmer than Note 4

Completely stock
Browser : 3683
Metal:1783
Multicore:1918

Not as high as I was expecting. I'm running FireKat with AEL kernel over clocked to 2.89Ghz, umbrella_core governor, I/O set to ROW, read ahead size is 1024, I left the voltages alone. My phone scored lower than a non modified Note 4!
Benchmarks are stupid and pointless anyways, but it's still interesting to run them. The real world performance with my phone is outstanding, so I'm happy.

I am wondering why my scores are so low. Especially in the cpu and ram department. Could it be a faulty device?
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ----------
Just a side note this is completely stock. No root and no overclock. It this a corect score? Is antu comparing to other rooted devices.

jonahtriangle said:
I am wondering why my scores are so low. Especially in the cpu and ram department. Could it be a faulty device?
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ----------
Just a side note this is completely stock. No root and no overclock. It this a corect score? Is antu comparing to other rooted devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about what I got stock. As long as your device performs well in the real world then that's all that counts. Benchmarks don't mean squat.
On another note, here's my latest benchmark done in the freezer to avoid thermal throttling. My phone is so beastly that Antutu couldn't verify it.
When I removed it from my freezer the CPU temps were around 25° C, so there shouldn't have been any thermal throttling going on.

Benkmark is so fiction
not carre about it

Here's my latest

Firekat v11

projectvomit said:
Firekat v11
View attachment 3223827
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine was on FireKat v11 as well

New benchmark with Vision X Lollipop, KT kernel, performance governor, and tested outside to keep the phone cool (25°F right now).

Stock - AnTuTu - 49591

Here is mine completely stock. I am with GCI In Alaska. Left is encrypted and right is not. Nothing running or installed. Everything updated.
Hope this helps.
stomped the G3 before and after encryption.

Slie said:
Here is mine completely stock. I am with GCI In Alaska. Left is encrypted and right is not. Nothing running or installed. Everything updated.
Hope this helps.
stomped the G3 before and after encryption.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops looks like photo didn't attach.

Mine

Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app

Antutu benchmark

What is the Best antutu score for note 5
Here is my test score

That's really good; I got 65469
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Don't you have anything installed? I got 45k, all apps closed and bootmanager in action to prevent unwanted apps to startup on boot!

I don't have root just used clean master and greenify app
First run I got 70430

i got 74000+, but you should use PCMARK, as it test the more in more scenarios and kinda replicates your daily usage.
I got enormus score.

how s this? running darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.1 undervolted by -100mv and overclocked to 2.4 a57 cores and 852mhz gpu.

That's good I mean very good

Hi,
arter97 lastest beta kernel with Interactive governor tweaked a bit for better performance (enforced_mode set to 1, min_sample_time, go_hispeed_load and hispeed_freq tweaked) and some VM tweaks (dirty_ratio, dirty_background_ratio, dirty_expire_centisecs, dirty_writeback_centisecs and swapiness), no undervolt.
CPU temp at 25 °C at the beginning...

SkyHigh 2.7 kernel, some tweaks like above without overclock / underclock:
I use the previous Antutu version to compare with my other scores when I test some tweaks (as a baseline), it would be time to update Antutu now

My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.

m4gg0t said:
My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got this using darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.7

Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.

m4gg0t said:
Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as you can see..there are real benefits ) not to mention better battery life and all around usage speed, fluidity...but hey, everybody uses their phone as they want. i m a poweruser...

i have 84089
n920c

junior00027 said:
i have 84089
n920c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the usual score @ stock rom, kernel is anything from 80.000 to 85.000 so you re perfectly stock with the score

Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk

My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk

haree87 said:
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kickoff said:
View attachment 3582674
My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys i m sorry to ruin your parade...but any score in red is not a valid one...sorry. When you will get a green score, post that. I could never get above 100.000 green score (max was around 97-98.000 with skyhigh kernel)..the only kernel that gets me over 110.000 is arter kernel and that is known already to have a bug in the UX Section that causes that big score...

score

Every time I'm getting around 80k on stock, which is slightly low i think.
When comparing the stats to the Note 5 at the ranking table its all the same with exception of the 3d score (garden) with my device always getting around 8.3k compared to 12.112 from Note 5 result from the ranking table.
Why do you think my 3d score is low?
Also I don't know if it's related but I have some sort of lag when scrolling through Facebook, YouTube etc...