Here's a link to recent benchmarks for the Galaxy Note Edge:
http://www.androidheadlines.com/2014/11/samsung-galaxy-note-edge-perform-benchmarks.html
Couple of screen shots from my device's benchmark results.
It says it is 64bit but currently set to 32bit.☺
I had 49850 on my 915k after root cm and freezing a few apps
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app
dennis nai said:
I had 49850 on my 915k after root cm and freezing a few apps
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which apps?
knox,some google apps and some samsung apps
Antutu = 49771 (N915S)
This is from the stock before root. Now I am running SkyHigh rom. Will test again soon.
Please can some xda expert help us to bring this beast above the 55000 mark? I truly belive it can be done.
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app
Finally broke 50k!
SM-N915S
Antutu: 50480
SkyHigh Rom by UpInTheAir, Rooted, DVFS disabled
Can't wait until UpInTheAir has a working kernel for the 915S. Once I can properly overclock this beast I can easily see this device hitting 55k+
tospace2006 said:
Finally broke 50k!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
jafangie said:
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haven't tried Antutu 5.5 yet I'll try to top yours
jafangie said:
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe still running no overclock as well: 51874
Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous in terms of score.
UpInTheAir just finished his kernel for 915S so finally time to get overclocking
tospace2006 said:
Hehe still running no overclock as well: 51874
Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous in terms of score.
UpInTheAir just finished his kernel for 915S so finally time to get overclocking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I was annoyed few minutes... But yes you 're right : Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous.... in the morning!
On waking, it is still better!
Have a nice day!
Seriously, I think that 53000 should be the maximum without overclocking...
jafangie said:
Hi,
I was annoyed few minutes... But yes you 're right : Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous.... in the morning!
On waking, it is still better!
Have a nice day!
Seriously, I think that 53000 should be the maximum without overclocking...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
53000 would be quite a challenge I believe. Here is my one last attempt with stock.
Getting closer to 53000 but I think an extra 800 points without OC will be a bit of a stretch.
tospace2006 said:
53000 would be quite a challenge I believe. Here is my one last attempt with stock.
Getting closer to 53000 but I think an extra 800 points without OC will be a bit of a stretch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
jafangie said:
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am lucky if I can break 40,000! Nice scores.
jafangie said:
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been trying... can't beat that man good job. It's -10 so maybe I'll give it another go later. OC is being tricky and seems to be degrading performance than gaining atm...
CreekDirt said:
I am lucky if I can break 40,000! Nice scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
UpInTheAir said:
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my first Snapdragon phone from Samsung. All of my previous versions were the Exynos builds since as far back as the S2. Stock unrooted it was around 38,000. Stock rooted it is only marginally better.
UpInTheAir said:
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4. I am observing this quite a bit after consecutive benchmarks.
5. My god even after debloating and freezing all unwanted proccesses the phone still requires 2GB or ram to run at all times and at max I only have less than 1GB of free ram. I feel like this is taking a hit on the scores too. My G3 I had it down to 1.3GB used RAM so effectively had about 1.7GB free at max. What could be taking up so much RAM at all times.
CreekDirt said:
This is my first Snapdragon phone from Samsung. All of my previous versions were the Exynos builds since as far back as the S2. Stock unrooted it was around 38,000. Stock rooted it is only marginally better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the G3 Cat.6 with SD805 and noticed very disappointing scores stock. The G3 also had very aggressive thermal throttling and the SD805 was a very hot running chip.
Once I got everything debloated and thermal turned off it hit almost 48,000.
I know that the S5 prime had better scores than the Cat.6 due to much better thermals and would expect the same out of the Note.
Try rooting and debloating your phone if you want to experiment and disable DVFS for better scores.
I also place my phone by an open window as it's -10 degrees Celsius now and low temp gives great boosts to your scores.
tospace2006 said:
4. I am observing this quite a bit after consecutive benchmarks.
5. My god even after debloating and freezing all unwanted proccesses the phone still requires 2GB or ram to run at all times and at max I only have less than 1GB of free ram. I feel like this is taking a hit on the scores too. My G3 I had it down to 1.3GB used RAM so effectively had about 1.7GB free at max. What could be taking up so much RAM at all times.
I had the G3 Cat.6 with SD805 and noticed very disappointing scores stock. The G3 also had very aggressive thermal throttling and the SD805 was a very hot running chip.
Once I got everything debloated and thermal turned off it hit almost 48,000.
I know that the S5 prime had better scores than the Cat.6 due to much better thermals and would expect the same out of the Note.
Try rooting and debloating your phone if you want to experiment and disable DVFS for better scores.
I also place my phone by an open window as it's -10 degrees Celsius now and low temp gives great boosts to your scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been rooted for almost a month now, but haven't gotten around to debloating since there isn't a need to. My phone flies. The only hesitation I see is if I actually use the menu key to see the task manager. Since I have the manager on my Edge bar I rarely even do that.
Debloating might be in my future just to see if I can finally reach that 6 hour screen on time. This phone has very few wake locks which has surprised me.
Related
Ok so I've been tweaking my phone, doing everything in my knowledge to make it faster. I am using the stock rom with faux123 mako jb enhanced stock 422-r2. So my first benchmark on Antutu i got 18003. re-ran the same benchmark again with the same tweaks and got 14206 and thought it was anomaly so i ran it one more time and got 16142. I went back and re tweaked everything and my scores were every were, even in quadrant. the ranges were between 14200-16800. I haven't been able to get it back to 18003, maybe because i did it on a cold boob. but, the scores shouldn't be all over the place compared to benchmarking I've done on other phones. Any ideas on this and or fix it?
Your phone is throttling. Your first benchmark will normally be your fastest. I that's how it was for me anyways.
I've also had the same experience. It is certainly due to throttling.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Welcome to thermal throttling. I recommend a ROM with the Bionic patches (there is an otherwise 'stock' AOSP ROM with these in the dev section, I'm not a stock ROM user so I haven't any experience with it) and you should notice AnTuTu scores going up to 20k+ and a noticeable boost to actual usage. If your device will under volt well (most will do at least -100mV AFAIK) you may mitigate the throttling to some extent without compromising stability however I don't recommend disabling the thermal protection as is possible in some kernels due to the red light death issue. Throttling is only really noticeable when you benchmark back-to-back. It's not a massive issue in most real-world use. I suspect it will become more and more noticeable on newer devices as device manufacturers and SoC designers are forever scrambling to provide the best performance within the thermal constraints of a smartphone. As idle and low load consumption goes down with new processes, full load GPU and CPU thermals are forever increasing!
PA tweak improves benchmarks
I have to agree with you on this. The stock gave me an score of 17K (antutu). stability curve was all over the place in stock. switching to PA did not help much either, the scored went down to around 14K. yesterday i got an update from PA and flashing that gave me a boost of 18991. some good tweaks from PA i guess.
MrKickstand said:
Ok so I've been tweaking my phone, doing everything in my knowledge to make it faster. I am using the stock rom with faux123 mako jb enhanced stock 422-r2. So my first benchmark on Antutu i got 18003. re-ran the same benchmark again with the same tweaks and got 14206 and thought it was anomaly so i ran it one more time and got 16142. I went back and re tweaked everything and my scores were every were, even in quadrant. the ranges were between 14200-16800. I haven't been able to get it back to 18003, maybe because i did it on a cold boob. but, the scores shouldn't be all over the place compared to benchmarking I've done on other phones. Any ideas on this and or fix it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao cold boob!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
MrKickstand said:
Ok so I've been tweaking my phone, doing everything in my knowledge to make it faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are making faster a device which already is one of the FASTEST devices on this planet?
maybe because i did it on a cold boob
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL:laugh:
See if it's a governor problem, set it to performance and see if it levels out. GPU scores on antutu vary by @ 1000 marks, so take that into account too.
Hello there!
I've got an idea to make a post-poll to see what scores Antutu Benchmark is giving us in the Shield Tablet on any ROM, like CM11, Stock, etc.
Mine (WiFi-only model) got 53.844 points, with the latest stock firmware (1.2.1) and Antutu Benchmark 5.1.. Also, it was set to Max. Performance mode..
I also made a video, you can check it here:
What are your best scores with the Shield Tablet?
(And sorry for my bad english lol)
Of course, I didn't mentioned it, but It'd be nice to compare scores between roms, so, if you're using a different rom than stock, like CM11, please post it, so that we know which rom has best performance
56674
Settings > SHIELD Power Control > Processor Mode: Using Max Performance
Stock 2.2.1 update, no root.
hapihakr said:
Settings > SHIELD Power Control > Processor Mode: Using Max Performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In mine with 2.2.1 rooted I got the other days around 57 thousand and something, what a pity I didn't take any screenshot :silly:
(Also on max performance)
linuxct said:
Of course, I didn't mentioned it, but It'd be nice to compare scores between roms, so, if you're using a different rom than stock, like CM11, please post it, so that we know which rom has best performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROM that has the highest Antutu score, and the ROM that has the best performance could (most probably) be different. It's been proven time and time again that benchmarks mean little when it comes to real world performance.
stock and shaky kernel
Before 62000 couples times stock, shaky kernel, booster plus and battery saver,busyboox ,CPU tuner and shield in my power mode full
Right now 59326 with stock,shaky,booster plus,busybox,device control,CPU tuner,auto kill apk and shield in my power mode.
57,340
always one guy that just has to remind us that benchmarks don't necessarily mean your going to have a good experience across the board, yeah bud, we know, this is XDA, it's fun to benchmark, get over it. [rant off]
anywho, I'm stock, unlocked, and rooted with titanium to freeze apps and CWM for backups.
got a 56,593 & 57,340 Whoot!
Here's a recent one on mine. I want to hit 65k but that will likely require a GPU OC among other optimizations.
Pilz said:
Here's a recent one on mine. I want to hit 65k but that will likely require a GPU OC among other optimizations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How so much, custom kernel & overclock?????
cyraxx84 said:
How so much, custom kernel & overclock?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I OC'd my CPU to 2.5ghz and that's was about it. I'm running BitOsessions kernel on my stock Shield Tablet. I did another one a while ago that hit 63k but I can't find my screenshot so I'm working to get past that again.
Here's another one I did when I dropped the resolution from 1080 FHD to 720 HD.
Accidental double post... Delete
90009 on Stock Rooted MM ROM...
I got 84071 on mine
Edit: re-did the test after installing the latest update and got 84767
About 91500 on latest antutu 6.01. Stock 6.0 rooted and debloated.
Beat Y'all If you can
Screenshot Or it Didn't Happened
Nvidia Stock LP v5.1.1, rooted, no "performance related" modifications to speak of.
highest: 82517
average: 81842 (based on reboot then running Antutu v6.0.1 6 times in a row, scores increased on each run until the sixth)
FoxyDrew said:
The ROM that has the highest Antutu score, and the ROM that has the best performance could (most probably) be different. It's been proven time and time again that benchmarks mean little when it comes to real world performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely disagree with this without meaning to be rude because every person suffers from confirmation bias and "self benchmarking" is one area where it effects everybody greatly.
To the extent that people can have very different experiences on exactly the same hardware and software as a matter of routine - and no one can know that it has ocurred since it's automatic.
Benchmarks are the in fact the only way to measure objectively IME and opinion.
This is certainly not to say that anyone has a better or worse experience though as you point out, that i agree with.
Antutu Benchmark
No root/no debloat - MM 6.0.1
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
mujikhalid said:
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does your device perform slow?No?Why the **** do you care about useless benchmarks....your device got a lower score than the S5 so what?Numbers don't equal performance...try doing a ful wipe if you already didn't...
There are already threads about this and you don''t care to search the forum before posting the same thread?
Woah dude, chill , dont be so pissed if you got to see a same thread on the forum lol
mujikhalid said:
Woah dude, chill , dont be so pissed if you got to see a same thread on the forum lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah..I'm not pissed lol...sorry if I sounded like that it's just that those benchmarks are useless.Judge the device by the way you see how it performs in everyday use not by a number you got from a benchmark app...and also as I mentioned there are already threads about this so use the search function
Your note 4 shipped with 4.4. Its built for 4.4. Use 4.4
The rampant lust for updates, and the subsequent disappointment that follows is draining
dannstarr said:
Your note 4 shipped with 4.4. Its built for 4.4. Use 4.4
The rampant lust for updates, and the subsequent disappointment that follows is draining
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have any problem with the 5.0.1 in Note 4. I'm coming from Galaxy S5 and there is no way the Note 4 is performing worse than the S5. Its way faster.
I agree that benchmark points is useless and says little about the performance of the device.
Man i have the same problem here it seems that the phone is always in power saving mode and the gpu is limited to 350 mhz instead of 700 mhz. Also the cpu runs at 1.3 ghz instead of 1.9 for the big cores thats why it has low score in antutu hope somebody figures out a solution and also this is a bug in this update
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
meh
You guys are just being paranoid, I even noticed that it got faster after the lollipop update, I would never care for benchmark numbers as long as I am satisfied with the performance in real world, benchmarks can be influenced by many factors and I barely trust them (and ofc I am talking about Android benchmarks)
Edit: I just tried running a benchmark in Antutu and got 37940, ran it again and guess what? I got 44304, how can I trust this? LOL (I knew it would be way different from a benchmark to another, as it used to happen with me on my old HTC One X, since then I never trust these benchmarks). Just enjoy your phone and stop looking for non-existent problems.
mujikhalid said:
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many places in xda I read about this antutu score, i want to know what will i get if my phone get 100000 score?we can win any price?
Thanks
its a bug
enable power saving mode and turn off cpu limit then turn off power saving mode back
go to developer option and reduce the animation to .5 sec
redo your test
Yathani said:
its a bug
enable power saving mode and turn off cpu limit then turn off power saving mode back
go to developer option and reduce the animation to .5 sec
redo your test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried all above, but still get 37K score. most degradation is in 3D graphics. Also in UX and single thread CPU.
Still can not understand why it happens.
I did the same thing nothing changed
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
so what were you expecting? A 75k + score after you updated?
Sent from my VZW LG G2
mrao said:
so what were you expecting? A 75k + score after you updated?
Sent from my VZW LG G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course not, we expected the score to be at least the same !
Except the score you can notice that fps has dropped in games.
It also has some problems definitely, I have hangouts crashing several times a day.
UX runtime is much lower in my case also.
Benchmark scores are 100% useless.
zerojay said:
Benchmark scores are 100% useless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no they are not useless and I can see that on practice, performance has slowed down just like benchmark scores got lower.
Benchmark can precisely tell and measure the performance, that's it's purpose. In my case I can feel the difference not only in benchmark scores bat in practice also.
Same for me. Tried fresh wipe, re-odin, etc
Benchmarks are 100% useful and in the fact the performance has gotten worse on the beastly note 4 it feels same as note 3 is that even called update anymore. The frames per second for big games is just arownd 20 fps its very disapointinf
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
sirwanesmail said:
Benchmarks are 100% useful and in the fact the performance has gotten worse on the beastly note 4 it feels same as note 3 is that even called update anymore. The frames per second for big games is just arownd 20 fps its very disapointinf
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly what I was talking about !
Is anyone concerned about it and planning something or has samsung officials made any comment about this issue ?
Try this method & let me know about gpu bug.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3075440
Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
What i have done to the moto x style:
unlocked bootloader
Installed supersu and xposed.
Factory reset already done.
Performance seems not that bad actually.
But the scores tells me otherwise.
benchmark scores.
see my screenshots about this issue.
bartjeh1991 said:
Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
What i have done to the moto x style:
unlocked bootloader
Installed supersu and xposed.
Factory reset already done.
Performance seems not that bad actually.
But the scores tells me otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your performance feels good in real world use, why do you need some benchmark to tell you otherwise?
I am on aicp and put xclark kernel to perfromance and got 48k, before i had it on interactive and hotplug on eco performance. No difference felt how device performed.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
bartjeh1991 said:
Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running CM12.1
AnTuTu 51342
Watch this https://youtu.be/8iMRaIsaFX4?t=4m listen from 4:00-4:30. Hilarious
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
eyecon82 said:
Watch this https://youtu.be/8iMRaIsaFX4?t=4m listen from 4:00-4:30. Hilarious
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
JohnMcW said:
Running CM12.1
AnTuTu 51342
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
bradley26 said:
If your performance feels good in real world use, why do you need some benchmark to tell you otherwise?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are absolutely right. I was checking some governor settings. And seemed the governor on the little cores, was not at all optimized. Underclocked now because the speed is decent again
bartjeh1991 said:
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been using it as my daily,
Only one issue that has caused some concerns is that, if you lose the phone signal and you are on gsm,
it switches to cdma and then acts like you don't have a sim card...It can take reboots and hours for it to
return to gsm. However this hasn't happened to me for 5 days now with the newer builds.
My phone hardly ever heats up much with cm12.1...and I DON"T use any processor tweaks.
bartjeh1991 said:
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
You are absolutely right. I was checking some governor settings. And seemed the governor on the little cores, was not at all optimized. Underclocked now because the speed is decent again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that video goes to exactly show you why benchmarks don't mean anything
I hate apple, but Apple definitely got it right by saying it is not always all about "hardware specs" and it's more of a coexisting relationship between the hardware and software that is more important.
Samsung definitely has the superior hardware, but their ****ty TouchWiz screws it all up
Hi I'm highly satisfied with my oneplus 5 and I like to show off my benchmark scores. Recently my benchmark has only been around a little over 150k when I use to score 185k sometimes 190k. Anyone know why this is? I do have xposed framework installed but I even switched my Rom and tested it and still got only 155k. I don't notice any drops in performance I would just like to know what the issue may be. Thanks guys
182k on No Limits 3.4 rom with Franco kernel v7.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
jamorimpt said:
182k on No Limits 3.4 rom with Franco kernel v7.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly what I'm running it's very frustrating
Hey,
Your processor scores significantly less than it should, usually it scores around 40000 on the oneplus 5.
Maybe it's underclocked?
Please upload a screenshot with more details, like this one:
Best regards,
Most probably the highest frequency of big.little is stuck at an lower frequency. Go to developer options in ROM and turn on overscale CPU usage, then run Antutu again and see what's the highest frequency(s) you got while running. If it doesnt go above 2457mhz (cluster 2) than it makes sense why your score is low. Also check your "i/o" scheduler and "read ahead buffer size" in your kernel tweak app. This can also affect your score.
Besides all this, don't run Antutu with low battery this affects the score for sure.
lekiaM said:
Most probably the highest frequency of big.little is stuck at an lower frequency. Go to developer options in ROM and turn on overscale CPU usage, then run Antutu again and see what's the highest frequency(s) you got while running. If it doesnt go above 2457mhz (cluster 2) than it makes sense why your score is low. Also check your "i/o" scheduler and "read ahead buffer size" in your kernel tweak app. This can also affect your score.
Besides all this, don't run Antutu with low battery this affects the score for sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the help I'm going to reflash my rom and see if it helps.
Benchmarks are what they are... Anyway I've tested with stock kernel and it's giving even more:
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
vegoja said:
Thanks for the help I'm going to reflash my rom and see if it helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
reflash, keep it clean, full charge, put it in the freezer pluged-in. andddd hit 188000 :good:
I wouldn't get too caught up in the whole benchmarks thing. They don't always translate to real world performance; I would rather show off my phone's snappy interface (i.e. quick app loading, navigating menus, etc.)
I personally think that's worth showing off more than just numbers that appear on an app!
Just my two cents though, you're free to disagree and do what makes you happy of course
rickysidhu_ said:
I wouldn't get too caught up in the whole benchmarks thing. They don't always translate to real world performance; I would rather show off my phone's snappy interface (i.e. quick app loading, navigating menus, etc.)
I personally think that's worth showing off more than just numbers that appear on an app!
Just my two cents though, you're free to disagree and do what makes you happy of course
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I don't notice any less performance so I'm not too worried about it. I do wonder how my big cluster got set to 1.9 ghz tho as I haven't messed with the tuning of my kernel seems to try to set it as default. But like I said I have xposed, a couple of audio mods, and gravity box. I'm bound to have some unwanted side effects from it.
vegoja said:
Yea I don't notice any less performance so I'm not too worried about it. I do wonder how my big cluster got set to 1.9 ghz tho as I haven't messed with the tuning of my kernel seems to try to set it as default. But like I said I have xposed, a couple of audio mods, and gravity box. I'm bound to have some unwanted side effects from it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair points! Kind of off-topic but I'm just curious as to how you went about installing Xposed? Are you using the Magisk module or did you flash via TWRP?
rickysidhu_ said:
Fair points! Kind of off-topic but I'm just curious as to how you went about installing Xposed? Are you using the Magisk module or did you flash via TWRP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is an option to flash with xXx Rom but Ive flash the purify xposed zip via TWRP. I've also used the systemless xposed from magisk but I believe it only works if you already have xposed installed.